New Madrid Earthquake

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

New Madrid Earthquake DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR UNITED STATES GEOLOGICAL SURVEY GEOEGE OTIS SMITH, DIBECTOB BULLETIN 494 THE NEW MADRID EARTHQUAKE BY MYRON L. FULLER WASHINGTON GOVERNMENT PRINTING OFFICE 1912 CONTENTS. Page. Introduction.............................................................. 7 General statement...................................................... 7 Field work and acknowledgments...................................... 7 The story of the earthquake................................................. 9 Sources of information.................................................. 9 Summary of the disaster............................................... 10 Previous earthquakes in the Mississippi Valley.............................. 11 Recorded shocks....................................................... 11 Indian traditions...................................................... 12 Geologic evidence..................................................... 12 Record of the shocks....................................................... 13 Atmospheric conditions preceding first shock............................ 13 Time of the shocks..................................................... 13 Center of disturbance................................................... 14 Earlier shock...................................................... 14 Subsequent shocks................................................. 15 Area affected.......................................................... 16 General destructiveness of the shocks.................................... 17 Number and distribution of the shocks.................................. 17 Effects of the shocks outside of the New Madrid area..................... 21 Mississippi Valley.................................................. 21 Ohio Valley........................................................ 22 Louisville..................................................... 22 Cincinnati..................................................... 26 Other localities................................................. 27 Great Lakes region................................................. 28 Atlantic Coastal and Piedmont plains................................ 29 Nature of the vibrations............................................... 31 Classification of intensities............................................. 33 Periods of activity....................................................... 33 Relation of distribution of shocks to time of day.......................... 35 Relation of distribution of shocks to diurnal variations of barometric pres­ sure. ................................................................ 36 Relation of distribution of shocks to phases of moon...................... 37 Relation of the earthquake and the weather............................. 39 Direction of vibrations................................................. 40 Effect of the earthquake on life......................................... 40 Government relief...................................................... 43 Phenomena of the earthquake............................................... 44 Atmospheric phenomena................................................. 44 Darkness......................................................... 44 Odors and vapors.................................................... 45 "Light flashes" and "glows"....................................... 46 3 4 CONTENTS. Phenomena of the earthquake Continued. Page. Geologic phenomena..........................:......... ..,............. 47 Fissures.......................................................... 47 Record of assuring............................................. 47 Character of the fissures........................................ 48 Types.................................................... 48 Form...................................................... 48 Arrangement.............................................. 49 Intervals................................................. 49 Direction.................................................. 49 Length................................................... 51 Depth.................................................... 51 Fillings (sand dikes)....................................... 51 Objects swallowed by fissures.............................. 52 Distribution of the fissures..................................... 52 Situation.................................................. 52 Localities.................................................. 53 Cause of fissuring............................................... 56 Bluff fissures............................................'... 56 Fissures of the sand-blow regions............................ 57 Fissures of the sand sloughs....................... ........ 57 Compound fissures........................................ 57 Faults............................................................ 58 Location....................................................... 58 Cause......................................................... 59 Landslides......................................................... 59 Chickasaw Bluffs............................................... 59 Location and character.................................... 59 Cause..................................................... 61 Warping.......................................................... 62 Uplifts and doming............................................ 62 The records............................................... 62 Tiptonville dome......................................... 63 Blytheville dome.......................................... 63 Little River dome.......................................... 64 Other domes............................................... 64 Cause of uplifts and doming................................. 64 Depression "sunk lands"...................................... 64 Types.................................................... 65 Form and trend............................................ 66 Amount of subsidence..................................... 67 Distribution.............................................. 68 Cause of sinking........................................... 74 Extrusion............................................................ 76 Records.......................................................... 76 Character of ejected material....................................... 76 Temperature of ejected water...................................... 77 Escape of gas and water after the earthquake........................ 78 Resulting features................................................. 79 Sand blows.................................................... 79 Nature................................................... 79 Situation............'...................................... 80 Distribution.............................................. 80 CONTENTS. 5 Phenomena of the earthquake Continued. Extrusion Continued. Resulting features Continued. Page. Sand sloughs.................................................... 83 Nature................................................... 83 Situation.................................................. 83 Distribution.............................................. 84 Sand scatters................................................. 85 Cause of extrusion.................................................. 85 Undermining......................................................... 87 Fault trenches..................................................... 87 Sand sloughs....................................................... 87 Sinks............................................................. 87 Hydrologic phenomena................................................ 89 Agitation of water surfaces......................................... 89 Effect on navigation................................................ 92 Caving of banks............................................... 92 Disappearance of islands....................................... 93 Snags and sawyers. ........................-..-.. --- ----- - - 94 Floating wreckage............................................. 94 Changes in springs.................................................. 95 Action of the earthquake on forests..................................... 95 Splitting of trees................................................... 95 Destruction of forests by waves and caving banks..................... 96 Overthrow of forests by landslides.................................. 96 General prostration of forests by vibrations........................... 97 Dead trees.............................................. ......... 98 Uplifted trees..................................................... 98 Submerged forests................................................. 98 Area of destruction................................................. 98 Effect on artificial structures............................................ 99 New Madrid region................................................. 99 Distant localities......................:............................ 100 Other physical phenomena............................................. 1.01 Noises................................. 1.......................... 101 Origin and cause of the New Madrid earthquakes............................. 102 Popular beliefs......................................................... 102 Evidence of origin...................................................... 103 Location of centrum................................................... 104 Ultimate cause......................................................... 105 Significance
Recommended publications
  • 2021 Oregon Seismic Hazard Database: Purpose and Methods
    State of Oregon Oregon Department of Geology and Mineral Industries Brad Avy, State Geologist DIGITAL DATA SERIES 2021 OREGON SEISMIC HAZARD DATABASE: PURPOSE AND METHODS By Ian P. Madin1, Jon J. Francyzk1, John M. Bauer2, and Carlie J.M. Azzopardi1 2021 1Oregon Department of Geology and Mineral Industries, 800 NE Oregon Street, Suite 965, Portland, OR 97232 2Principal, Bauer GIS Solutions, Portland, OR 97229 2021 Oregon Seismic Hazard Database: Purpose and Methods DISCLAIMER This product is for informational purposes and may not have been prepared for or be suitable for legal, engineering, or surveying purposes. Users of this information should review or consult the primary data and information sources to ascertain the usability of the information. This publication cannot substitute for site-specific investigations by qualified practitioners. Site-specific data may give results that differ from the results shown in the publication. WHAT’S IN THIS PUBLICATION? The Oregon Seismic Hazard Database, release 1 (OSHD-1.0), is the first comprehensive collection of seismic hazard data for Oregon. This publication consists of a geodatabase containing coseismic geohazard maps and quantitative ground shaking and ground deformation maps; a report describing the methods used to prepare the geodatabase, and map plates showing 1) the highest level of shaking (peak ground velocity) expected to occur with a 2% chance in the next 50 years, equivalent to the most severe shaking likely to occur once in 2,475 years; 2) median shaking levels expected from a suite of 30 magnitude 9 Cascadia subduction zone earthquake simulations; and 3) the probability of experiencing shaking of Modified Mercalli Intensity VII, which is the nominal threshold for structural damage to buildings.
    [Show full text]
  • Bray 2011 Pseudostatic Slope Stability Procedure Paper
    Paper No. Theme Lecture 1 PSEUDOSTATIC SLOPE STABILITY PROCEDURE Jonathan D. BRAY 1 and Thaleia TRAVASAROU2 ABSTRACT Pseudostatic slope stability procedures can be employed in a straightforward manner, and thus, their use in engineering practice is appealing. The magnitude of the seismic coefficient that is applied to the potential sliding mass to represent the destabilizing effect of the earthquake shaking is a critical component of the procedure. It is often selected based on precedence, regulatory design guidance, and engineering judgment. However, the selection of the design value of the seismic coefficient employed in pseudostatic slope stability analysis should be based on the seismic hazard and the amount of seismic displacement that constitutes satisfactory performance for the project. The seismic coefficient should have a rational basis that depends on the seismic hazard and the allowable amount of calculated seismically induced permanent displacement. The recommended pseudostatic slope stability procedure requires that the engineer develops the project-specific allowable level of seismic displacement. The site- dependent seismic demand is characterized by the 5% damped elastic design spectral acceleration at the degraded period of the potential sliding mass as well as other key parameters. The level of uncertainty in the estimates of the seismic demand and displacement can be handled through the use of different percentile estimates of these values. Thus, the engineer can properly incorporate the amount of seismic displacement judged to be allowable and the seismic hazard at the site in the selection of the seismic coefficient. Keywords: Dam; Earthquake; Permanent Displacements; Reliability; Seismic Slope Stability INTRODUCTION Pseudostatic slope stability procedures are often used in engineering practice to evaluate the seismic performance of earth structures and natural slopes.
    [Show full text]
  • Living on Shaky Ground: How to Survive Earthquakes and Tsunamis
    HOW TO SURVIVE EARTHQUAKES AND TSUNAMIS IN OREGON DAMAGE IN doWNTOWN KLAMATH FALLS FRom A MAGNITUde 6.0 EARTHQUAke IN 1993 TSUNAMI DAMAGE IN SEASIde FRom THE 1964GR EAT ALASKAN EARTHQUAke 1 Oregon Emergency Management Copyright 2009, Humboldt Earthquake Education Center at Humboldt State University. Adapted and reproduced with permission by Oregon Emergency You Can Prepare for the Management with help from the Oregon Department of Geology and Mineral Industries. Reproduction by permission only. Next Quake or Tsunami Disclaimer This document is intended to promote earthquake and tsunami readiness. It is based on the best SOME PEOplE THINK it is not worth preparing for an earthquake or a tsunami currently available scientific, engineering, and sociological because whether you survive or not is up to chance. NOT SO! Most Oregon research. Following its suggestions, however, does not guarantee the safety of an individual or of a structure. buildings will survive even a large earthquake, and so will you, especially if you follow the simple guidelines in this handbook and start preparing today. Prepared by the Humboldt Earthquake Education Center and the Redwood Coast Tsunami Work Group (RCTWG), If you know how to recognize the warning signs of a tsunami and understand in cooperation with the California Earthquake Authority what to do, you will survive that too—but you need to know what to do ahead (CEA), California Emergency Management Agency (Cal EMA), Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA), of time! California Geological Survey (CGS), Department of This handbook will help you prepare for earthquakes and tsunamis in Oregon. Interior United States Geological Survey (USGS), the National Oceanographic and Atmospheric Administration It explains how you can prepare for, survive, and recover from them.
    [Show full text]
  • Beyond the Angle of Repose: a Review and Synthesis of Landslide Processes in Response to Rapid Uplift, Eel River, Northern Eel River, Northern California
    Portland State University PDXScholar Geology Faculty Publications and Presentations Geology 2-23-2015 Beyond the Angle of Repose: A Review and Synthesis of Landslide Processes in Response to Rapid Uplift, Eel River, Northern Eel River, Northern California Joshua J. Roering University of Oregon Benjamin H. Mackey University of Canterbury Alexander L. Handwerger University of Oregon Adam M. Booth Portland State University, [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: https://pdxscholar.library.pdx.edu/geology_fac David A. Schmidt Univ Persityart of of the W Geologyashington Commons , Geomorphology Commons, and the Geophysics and Seismology Commons Let us know how access to this document benefits ou.y See next page for additional authors Citation Details Roering, Joshua J., Mackey, Benjamin H., Handwerger, Alexander L., Booth, Adam M., Schmidt, David A., Bennett, Georgina L., Cerovski-Darriau, Corina, Beyond the angle of repose: A review and synthesis of landslide pro-cesses in response to rapid uplift, Eel River, Northern California, Geomorphology (2015), doi: 10.1016/j.geomorph.2015.02.013 This Post-Print is brought to you for free and open access. It has been accepted for inclusion in Geology Faculty Publications and Presentations by an authorized administrator of PDXScholar. Please contact us if we can make this document more accessible: [email protected]. Authors Joshua J. Roering, Benjamin H. Mackey, Alexander L. Handwerger, Adam M. Booth, David A. Schmidt, Georgina L. Bennett, and Corina Cerovski-Darriau This post-print is available at PDXScholar: https://pdxscholar.library.pdx.edu/geology_fac/75 ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT Beyond the angle of repose: A review and synthesis of landslide processes in response to rapid uplift, Eel River, Northern California Joshua J.
    [Show full text]
  • Earthquake/Landslide Death Scene Investigation Supplement
    Death Scene Investigation Supplement EARTHQUAKE/LANDSLIDE 1 DECEDENT PERSONAL DETAILS Last Name: First Name: Sex: Law Enforcement Case Number (if available): Male Female ME/C Case Number (if available): Law Enforcement Agency (if applicable): Date of Birth: Date of Death: Estimated Found Known MM DD YYYY MM DD YYYY Location of Injury (physical address, including ZIP code): 2 LOCATION OF THE DECEDENT Was the decedent found INDOORS? Yes No Complete 2A: OUTDOORS In what part of residence or building was the decedent found? Did the incident destroy the location? Yes No Unknown Did the incident collapse the walls or ceiling of the location? Yes No Unknown 2A OUTDOORS Was the decedent found OUTDOORS? Yes No Go to Section 3: Information about Circumstances of Death Any evidence the person was previously in a... Structure? Yes No Unknown Vehicle? Yes No Unknown 3 INFORMATION ABOUT CIRCUMSTANCES OF DEATH Does the cause of death appear to be due to any of the following? Select all potential causes of death. Complete all corresponding sections, THEN go to Section 7. Injury – Struck by (e.g., falling object)/Blunt force/Burns Complete Section 4: Injury Questions Motor Vehicle Crash Complete Section 5: Motor Vehicle Crash Questions Other (e.g., exacerbation of chronic diseases) Complete Section 6: Other Non-Injury Causes Questions 1 4 INJURY QUESTIONS How did the injury occur? Check all that apply: Hit by or struck against (Describe) Crushed (Describe) Asphyxia (Describe) Cut/laceration/impaled (Describe) Electric current or burn (Describe) Burn and/or
    [Show full text]
  • Kaae, Leonard Kuuleinamoku, July 19, 2012 Leonard Kuuleinamoku Kaae, 84, of Honolulu, a Retired Hawaiian Tug & Barge Seaman and an Army Veteran, Died
    Kaae, Leonard Kuuleinamoku, July 19, 2012 Leonard Kuuleinamoku Kaae, 84, of Honolulu, a retired Hawaiian Tug & Barge seaman and an Army veteran, died. He was born in Honolulu. He is survived by wife Ruth H. and sisters Ethel Hardley and Rose Giltner. Private services. [Honolulu Star-Advertiser 11 August 2012] Kaahanui, Agnes Lily Kahihiulaokalani, 77, of Honolulu, Hawaii, passed away June 14, 2012 at Kuakini Medical Center. Born July 10, 1934 in Honolulu, Hawaii. She was retired Maintenance Housekeeping Personel at Iolani Palace. She is survived by sons, Clifford Kalani (Marylyn) Kaahanui, Clyde Haumea Kaahanui, Cyrus Kamea Aloha Kaahanui, Hiromi (Jeanette) Fukuzawa; daughters, Katherine Ku’ulei Kaahanui, Kathleen Kuuipo (Arthur) Sing, Karen Kehaulani Kaahanui; 14 grandchildren; 10 great-grandchildren; sister, Rebecca Leimomi Naha. Visitation 10:00 a.m. Thursday (7/19) at Mililani Downtown Mortuary, Funeral Service 11:00 a.m., Burial 2:00 p.m. at Hawaiian Memorial Park Cemetery. Casual Attire. Flowers Welcome. [Honolulu Star-Advertiser 17 July 2012] Kaahanui, Agnes Lily Kahihiulaokalani, June 14, 2012 Agnes Lily Kahihiulaokalani Kaahanui, 77, of Honolulu, a retired Iolani Palace maintenance housekeeping worker, died in Kuakini Medical Center. She was born in Honolulu. She is survived by sons Clifford K., Clyde H. and Cyrus K. Kaahanui, and Hiromi Fukuzawa; daughters Katherine K. and Karen K. Kaahanui, and Kathleen K. Sing; sister Rebecca L. Naha; 14 grandchildren; and 10 great- grandchildren. Visitation: 10 a.m. Thursday at Mililani Downtown Mortuary. Services: 11 a.m. Burial: 2 p.m. at Hawaiian Memorial Park. Casual attire. Flowers welcome. [Honolulu Star- Advertiser 17 July 2012] Kaahanui, Carolyn Luana, July 21, 2012 Carolyn Luana Kaahanui, 59, of Kahului, a Makena Surf housekeeping department employee, died in Maui Memorial Medical Center.
    [Show full text]
  • Re-Purposing Commercial Entertainment Software for Military Use
    Calhoun: The NPS Institutional Archive Theses and Dissertations Thesis Collection 2000-09 Re-purposing commercial entertainment software for military use DeBrine, Jeffrey D. Monterey, California. Naval Postgraduate School http://hdl.handle.net/10945/26726 HOOL NAV CA 9394o- .01 NAVAL POSTGRADUATE SCHOOL Monterey, California THESIS RE-PURPOSING COMMERCIAL ENTERTAINMENT SOFTWARE FOR MILITARY USE By Jeffrey D. DeBrine Donald E. Morrow September 2000 Thesis Advisor: Michael Capps Co-Advisor: Michael Zyda Approved for public release; distribution is unlimited REPORT DOCUMENTATION PAGE Form Approved OMB No. 0704-0188 Public reporting burden for this collection of information is estimated to average 1 hour per response, including the time for reviewing instruction, searching existing data sources, gathering and maintaining the data needed, and completing and reviewing the collection of information. Send comments regarding this burden estimate or any other aspect of this collection of information, including suggestions for reducing this burden, to Washington headquarters Services, Directorate for Information Operations and Reports, 1215 Jefferson Davis Highway, Suite 1204, Arlington, VA 22202-4302, and to the Office of Management and Budget, Paperwork Reduction Project (0704-0188) Washington DC 20503. 1 . AGENCY USE ONLY (Leave blank) 2. REPORT DATE REPORT TYPE AND DATES COVERED September 2000 Master's Thesis 4. TITLE AND SUBTITLE 5. FUNDING NUMBERS Re-Purposing Commercial Entertainment Software for Military Use 6. AUTHOR(S) MIPROEMANPGS00 DeBrine, Jeffrey D. and Morrow, Donald E. 8. PERFORMING 7. PERFORMING ORGANIZATION NAME(S) AND ADDRESS(ES) ORGANIZATION REPORT Naval Postgraduate School NUMBER Monterey, CA 93943-5000 9. SPONSORING / MONITORING AGENCY NAME(S) AND ADDRESS(ES) 10. SPONSORING/ Office of Economic & Manpower Analysis MONITORING AGENCY REPORT 607 Cullum Rd, Floor IB, Rm B109, West Point, NY 10996-1798 NUMBER 11.
    [Show full text]
  • Quake Manual
    The Story QUAKE Background: You get the phone call at 4 a.m. By 5:30 you're in the secret installation. The commander explains tersely, "It's about the Slipgate device. Once we perfect these, we'll be able to use them to transport people and cargo from one place to another instantly. "An enemy codenamed Quake, is using his own slipgates to insert death squads inside our bases to kill, steal, and kidnap. "The hell of it is we have no idea where he's from. Our top scientists think Quake's not from Earth, but another dimension. They say Quake's preparing to unleash his real army, whatever that is. "You're our best man. This is Operation Counterstrike and you're in charge. Find Quake, and stop him ... or it ... You have full authority to requisition anything you need. If the eggheads are right, all our lives are expendable." Prelude to Destruction: While scouting the neighborhood, you hear shots back at the base. Damn, that Quake bastard works fast! He heard about Operation Counterstrike, and hit first. Racing back, you see the place is overrun. You are almost certainly the only survivor. Operation Counterstrike is over. Except for you. You know that the heart of the installation holds a slipgate. Since Quake's killers came through, it is still set to his dimension. You can use it to get loose in his hometown. Maybe you can get to the asshole personally. You pump a round into your shotgun, and get moving. System Requirements General Quake System Requirements IBM PC and Compatible Computers Pentium 75 MHz processor or better (absolutely must have a Math Co-Processor!) VGA Compatible Display or better Windows 95 Operation: 16MB RAM minimum, 24MB+ recommended CD-ROM drive required Hard Drive Space Needed: 80 MB Specialized Requirements For WinQuake (WINQUAKE.EXE): Windows 95/98/ME/NT/2000 For GLQuake (GLQUAKE.EXE): Windows 95/98/ME/NT/2000 Open GL Compatible Video Card GLQUAKE supports most 100% fully OpenGL compliant 3D accelerator cards.
    [Show full text]
  • China's Strategic Modernization: Implications for the United States
    CHINA’S STRATEGIC MODERNIZATION: IMPLICATIONS FOR THE UNITED STATES Mark A. Stokes September 1999 ***** The views expressed in this report are those of the author and do not necessarily reflect the official policy or position of the Department of the Army, the Department of the Air Force, the Department of Defense, or the U.S. Government. This report is cleared for public release; distribution is unlimited. ***** Comments pertaining to this report are invited and should be forwarded to: Director, Strategic Studies Institute, U.S. Army War College, 122 Forbes Ave., Carlisle, PA 17013-5244. Copies of this report may be obtained from the Publications and Production Office by calling commercial (717) 245-4133, FAX (717) 245-3820, or via the Internet at [email protected] ***** Selected 1993, 1994, and all later Strategic Studies Institute (SSI) monographs are available on the SSI Homepage for electronic dissemination. SSI’s Homepage address is: http://carlisle-www.army. mil/usassi/welcome.htm ***** The Strategic Studies Institute publishes a monthly e-mail newsletter to update the national security community on the research of our analysts, recent and forthcoming publications, and upcoming conferences sponsored by the Institute. Each newsletter also provides a strategic commentary by one of our research analysts. If you are interested in receiving this newsletter, please let us know by e-mail at [email protected] or by calling (717) 245-3133. ISBN 1-58487-004-4 ii CONTENTS Foreword .......................................v 1. Introduction ...................................1 2. Foundations of Strategic Modernization ............5 3. China’s Quest for Information Dominance ......... 25 4.
    [Show full text]
  • The Curtis L. Ivey Science Center DEDICATED SEPTEMBER 17, 2004
    NON-PROFIT Office of Advancement ORGANIZATION ALUMNI MAGAZINE COLBY-SAWYER Colby-Sawyer College U.S. POSTAGE 541 Main Street PAID New London, NH 03257 LEWISTON, ME PERMIT 82 C LBY-SAWYER CHANGE SERVICE REQUESTED ALUMNI MAGAZINE I NSIDE: FALL/WINTER 2004 The Curtis L. Ivey Science Center DEDICATED SEPTEMBER 17, 2004 F ALL/WINTER 2004 Annual Report Issue EDITOR BOARD OF TRUSTEES David R. Morcom Anne Winton Black ’73, ’75 CLASS NOTES EDITORS Chair Tracey Austin Ye ar of Gaye LaCasce Philip H. Jordan Jr. Vice-Chair CONTRIBUTING WRITERS Tracey Austin Robin L. Mead ’72 the Arts Jeremiah Chila ’04 Executive Secretary Cathy DeShano Ye ar of Nicole Eaton ’06 William S. Berger Donald A. Hasseltine Pamela Stanley Bright ’61 Adam S. Kamras Alice W. Brown Gaye LaCasce Lo-Yi Chan his month marks the launch of the Year of the Arts, a David R. Morcom Timothy C. Coughlin P’00 Tmultifaceted initiative that will bring arts faculty members to meet Kimberly Swick Slover Peter D. Danforth P’83, ’84, GP’02 the Arts Leslie Wright Dow ’57 with groups of alumni and friends around the country. We will host VICE PRESIDENT FOR ADVANCEMENT Stephen W. Ensign gatherings in art museums and galleries in a variety of cities, and Donald A. Hasseltine Eleanor Morrison Goldthwait ’51 are looking forward to engaging hundreds of alumni and friends in Suzanne Simons Hammond ’66 conversations about art, which will be led by our faculty experts. DIRECTOR OF DEVELOPMENT Patricia Driggs Kelsey We also look forward to sharing information about Colby-Sawyer’s Beth Cahill Joyce Juskalian Kolligian ’55 robust arts curriculum.
    [Show full text]
  • Engineering a Successful Mission: Lessons from the Lunar Reconnaissance Orbiter
    Engineering a Successful Mission: Lessons from the Lunar Reconnaissance Orbiter Presentation at the Supply Chain 2011 Conference October 19, 2011 David Everett, NASA GSFC Abstract • Engineering a Successful Mission: Lessons from the Lunar Reconnaissance Orbiter • Abstract—Schedule pressure is common in the commercial world, where late delivery of a product means delayed income and loss of profit. Research spacecraft developed by NASA, on the other hand, tend to be driven by the high cost of launch vehicles and the public scrutiny of failure--the primary driver is ensuring proper operation in space for a system that cannot be retrieved for repair. The Lunar Reconnaissance Orbiter (LRO) development faced both schedule pressure and high visibility. The team had to balance the strong push to meet a launch date against the need to ensure that this first mission for Exploration succeeded. This presentation will provide an overview of the mission from concept through its first year of operation and explore some of the challenges the systems engineering team faced taking a mission from preliminary design review to pre-ship review in 3 years. 2 10/19/11, Supply Chain 2011, LRO, D. Everett, NASA GSFC Topics • LRO Objectives • LRO Results to Date • Programmatic Environment During Development • Challenges and Approaches • I&T Overview • Observations and Lessons Learned 3 10/19/11, Supply Chain 2011, LRO, D. Everett, NASA GSFC LRO Beginning • January 2004, the President announced the “Vision for Space Exploration”, sending a “series of robotic missions” to the moon “beginning no later than 2008”. • Announcement of Opportunity for LRO instruments released in June 2004; target launch October 2008.
    [Show full text]
  • Level Design Histories and Futures”
    Level Design in a Day: “Level Design Histories and Futures” Robert Yang @radiatoryang About this talk ● Concepts and language to help you be critical about “level design” ● Not about “how to do level design” ● Heavy bias toward 3D character-based games (like everyone else) (The PERFECT level designer?) (one can dream...) Four (4) possible dimensions of contemporary level design ● as a material, as data ● as industrial process ● as architectural space ● as community politics 1:1: LevelLevel designdesign asas MATERIALS,MATERIALS, CONSTRUCTION,CONSTRUCTION, andand DATADATA “LEVEL” = a bunch of data (asset) that references a bunch of other data (other assets) “LEVEL EDITOR” = software that enables human visualization and modification of this data LEVEL EDITOR HISTORY: text editor as level editor LEVEL EDITOR HISTORY: studying tool interfaces / workflow LEVEL EDITOR HISTORY: one 2D floorplan pane AutoCAD (1982) DoomEd (~1992?) LEVEL EDITOR HISTORY: the asset browser Hammer (2004) Hammer (2006?) LEVEL EDITOR HISTORY: 3 pane, 3D preview + floorplan + elevation QuakeEd (1996) (great ancestor of “Radiant” level editors) LEVEL EDITOR HISTORY: mouse-look / WASD more emphasis on 3D camera view, more emphasis on “wandering” as workflow LEVEL EDITOR HISTORY: 4 pane, 3D preview + 2D ortho views 3D Studio (1990) Worldcraft (Hammer) (1996-2012?) Unreal Dev Kit (UE3, 2009) LEVEL EDITOR HISTORY: (from left to right:) - Unity one big interactive 3D view - Unreal 4 - SketchUp to rule them all and in the darkness bind them - Trenchbroom (Quake 1) - CryEngine3
    [Show full text]