Wood Tornado Shelter - Construction Guide November 2018

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Wood Tornado Shelter - Construction Guide November 2018 The Wood Tornado Shelter - Construction Guide November 2018 The Wood Tornado Shelter Prepared by Home Innovation Research Labs for the Forest Products Laboratory Table of Contents Introduction Introduction This 8 foot by 8 foot tornado shelter was developed Design Information by engineers at the US Department of Agriculture’s Siting Forest Products Laboratory to provide a design that Lumber Requirements is adaptable for existing construction and that is Safety easily constructed. Sequence of Construction Materials and Tools Design Information Section 1: Cutting the Lumber The tornado shelter presented here was laboratory Section 2: Constructing the Beams tested to meet impact and wind pressure Section 3: Building the Walls requirements. The following information may be Section 4: Constructing the Ceiling required with construction documents. Section 5: Attaching the Sheathing Section 6: Building and Hanging the Door • Type of shelter: Residential tornado Section 7: Providing Ventilation • The design meets the impact and wind Section 8: Anchoring the Shelter pressure requirements of ICC 500-2014: Standards for the Design and Construction of Storm Shelters. • Design Wind Speed: 250 mph Note to Reader • Wind Exposure Category: C Before ordering materials or starting construction: • Internal pressure coefficient, GCpi: +-0.55 • Read all instructions as construction • Topographic factor, Kzt: 1.0 options can affect quantity and size of • Directionality factor, Kd: 1.0 materials needed. Many steps are not • A statement must be provided that the reversible, so having a complete floor of the shelter has been constructed understanding of the construction process above the highest recorded flood elevation prior to starting will minimize costly if a flood hazard study has been conducted mistakes. for the area or the minimum elevation • Obtain approval of the plans and required by authority having jurisdiction. construction guide from your local • Extensive laboratory testing was performed building official to assure that this design to assure that this 8’x8’ tornado shelter is suitable for your jurisdiction. meets the impact and wind pressure requirements of Chapters 3 and 8 of ICC Page 1 The Wood Tornado Shelter - Construction Guide November 2018 500-2014: Standards for the Design and OR No. 4 bars, at a maximum • Concrete Foundation. If the foundation does Construction of Storm Shelters. Design spacing of 18 in. on center in two not meet the requirements stated earlier, FEMA assumptions and test results can be found perpendicular directions. P-320 provides foundation construction details: in the following two documents: d. Minimum 5’ slab extension on https://www.fema.gov/media-library- www.fpl.fs.fed.us/documnts/fplgtr/fpl_gtr2 each side of shelter to prevent data/1418837502817- 53.pdf foundation sliding and overturning. 920f09bb8187ee15436712a3e82ce709/FEMA_P www.fpl.fs.fed.us/documnts/fplgtr/fpl_gtr2 -320_2014-ConstructionPlans_508.pdf 54.pdf Design Limitations • Detachment from Host Building. Do not attach Other shelter sizes have not been tested. This shelter design meets the missile impact and any portion of the shelter to an adjoining wall or wind load requirements of national standards for to the floor or roof framing of the enclosing Wind speed/wind pressure calculations tornado shelters. As part of your planning process it structure (or vice versa). is important to contact your local building can be found in the following department to determine if there are other Costs document: requirements for tornado shelters in your area. For The designers of this tornado shelter estimate a https://www.fpl.fs.fed.us/documnts/fplrp/f example, some jurisdictions have requirements on material cost of between $3500 - $4000 (2016 pl_rp688.pdf door swing direction, which may affect the suitability dollars). See the Appendix of the following of this design to your location. document for a material list and costs: • The door shown in this construction guide Because the door design presented here is self-built, www.fpl.fs.fed.us/documnts/fplgtr/fpl_gtr253.pdf was laboratory tested for debris impact for it may not meet the door labeling requirements a 3’-0” width. (Section 108.2) of the ICC-500 standard. However, • Location of the tornado shelter within a extensive laboratory testing confirms that the door Lumber and Plywood Requirements host building and a drawing of the entire meets the impact and wind pressure requirements • #2 grade stamped softwood lumber with building. of the standard: engineering properties at least equivalent to the • A shelter section or elevation indicating the https://www.fpl.fs.fed.us/documnts/fplrp/fpl_rp686 Spruce Pine Fir (SPF) species group. height of the shelter relative to the finished .pdf • 22/32 softwood plywood sheathing. grade, finished floor and the host building, where applicable. Siting • Hold down design capacity: 4000 lb Before beginning construction of the shelter, ensure • Assumed friction coefficient for concrete that the installation site meets the following cast on soil, f: 0.50 requirements: • Occupant Load: 9 people • Proximity. If not located in the home, the • Usable floor area: 49 sf shelter must be located a maximum distance of • Venting area: 18.8 in2 150 ft. from the home. • Concrete foundation minimum • Protection from Rain and Snow. This shelter is requirements: not designed to be water-resistant and must be a. 4” thick concrete slab built inside the home, in a garage, or other b. 4000 psi minimum strength structure that protects the shelter from the c. 6x6 – W1.4xW1.4 welded wire elements. reinforcement over the entire area Page 2 The Wood Tornado Shelter - Construction Guide November 2018 General Safety Circular Saw Safety Follow these general safety instructions: • Never look away from your work • Keep a first aid kit nearby • Keep hands away from the cutting area • The work area should be clean and behind the blade organized • Stand to the side of the blade when cutting • Ensure the construction area is well • Do not use a dull saw blade ventilated • Secure metal materials with clamps before • Never leave an active power tool sawing unattended • Make sure the cutting material is not • Do not use a power tool with a frayed or touching the blade before starting the saw damaged power cord • Wear protective eyewear to protect against → Follow all tool manufacturer safety airborne particles instructions. → Additional guidance available from the • Ladders should be set on level surfaces, and locked in the open position Occupational Safety and Health Administration. DISCLAIMER • Tools used in damp conditions should be connected to a ground fault circuit The attached design and construction interrupter (GFCI) information is provided ”as is”, without • Nail gun: never aim a nail gun towards warranty of any kind, express or implied, anyone; do not press the trigger unless the including but not limited to the warranties of nose is pressed firmly against the nailing merchantability, fitness for a particular surface; do not use a nail gun that is not purpose, noninfringement, and any warranty functioning as specified by manufacturer; that this information is free from defects. In no remove air supply before clearing jams event shall USDA be liable for any claim, loss, • Power drill: change drill bit only after damages or other liability, whether in an action disconnecting power supply; tighten chuck of contract, tort or otherwise, arising from, out securely and remove chuck key before of or in connection with this information. The starting the drill; apply proper pressure to design has been tested according to industry drill specific standards as described in this • Hammer drill: never operate with one hand, document. USDA does not support and has no firmly grasp the trigger handle and auxiliary connection to any results obtained by using this handle for maximum control; wear design outside of the specific conditions cushioned gloves to reduce vibration described in this document. Page 3 The Wood Tornado Shelter - Construction Guide November 2018 Sequence of Construction 5. Attaching the sheathing. The 23/32 plywood The construction of this shelter design can be broken sheathing is cut to size and attached with nails down into the following 8 phases: and construction adhesive to the interior and 1. Cutting the lumber. The lumber is cut to exterior faces of all four walls and the interior length. Some pieces will also be rip cut to the of the ceiling (as well as the top of the ceiling correct width. The installer must keep careful if it is accessible). track of which pieces have been cut to which 6. Building and hanging the door. The door is length. made up of three sheets of 22/32 plywood 2. Constructing the beams. The triple beams sandwiched between two sheets of 18 gauge that make up the walls and ceiling of the cold-rolled steel, a material that must be shelter are made from three same-length sourced locally. The door is hung on bolt 2x8s. The middle 2x8 is offset by 1-1/2” to hooks installed on the exterior of the shelter give each beam a tongue-and-groove cross wall, and has latches on its interior surface for section. The 2x8s are joined with construction locking the shelter when occupied. Sheet adhesive and nails to form a laminated beam. metal angles are used to reinforce the door 3. Building the walls. The walls are constructed opening. These need custom fabrication and by laying one course of horizontal beams at a are sourced locally. Most cities have a steel time for the entire perimeter of the shelter. fabricator that can supply, cut, punch, and The next course’s tongue will fit into the bend sheet metal to custom sizes. lower course’s groove and is joined using 7. Ventilation. Ventilation holes are drilled construction adhesive. The beams are laid up through the wall at specified locations to such that the walls lock together in a log cabin provide fresh air to the interior of the shelter.
Recommended publications
  • Basic Technical Rules the Nubian Vault (Nv)
    PRODUCTION CENTRE INTERNATIONAL PROGRAMME BASIC TECHNICAL RULES v3 BASIC TECHNICAL RULES THE NUBIAN VAULT (NV) TECHNICAL CONCEPT THE NUBIAN VAULT ASSOCIATION (AVN) ADVICE TO MSA CLIENTS Version 3.0 SEASON 2013-2014 COUNTRY INTERNATIONAL Association « la Voûte Nubienne » - 7 rue Jean Jaurès – 34190 Ganges - France February 2015 www.lavoutenubienne.org / [email protected] / +33 (0)4 67 81 21 05 1/14 PRODUCTION CENTRE INTERNATIONAL PROGRAMME BASIC TECHNICAL RULES v3 CONTENTS CONTENTS.............................................................................................................2 1.AN ANCIENT TECHNIQUE, SIMPLIFIED, STANDARDISED & ADAPTED.........................3 2.MAIN FEATURES OF THE NV TECHNIQUE........................................................................4 3.THE MAIN STAGES OF NV CONSTRUCTION.....................................................................5 3.1.EXTRACTION, FABRICATION & TRANSPORT OF MATERIAL....................................5 3.2.CHOOSING THE SITE....................................................................................................5 3.3.MAIN STRUCTURAL WORKS........................................................................................6 3.3.1.Foundations........................................................................................................................................ 6 3.3.2.Load-bearing walls.............................................................................................................................. 7 3.3.3.Arches in load-bearing
    [Show full text]
  • FEMA P-361, Safe Rooms for Tornadoes And
    Safe Rooms for Tornadoes and Hurricanes Guidance for Community and Residential Safe Rooms FEMA P-361, Third Edition / March 2015 All illustrations in this document were created by FEMA or a FEMA contractor unless otherwise noted. All photographs in this document are public domain or taken by FEMA or a FEMA contractor, unless otherwise noted. Portions of this publication reproduce excerpts from the 2014 ICC/NSSA Standard for the Design and Construction of Storm Shelters (ICC 500), International Code Council, Inc., Washington, D.C. Reproduced with permission. All rights reserved. www.iccsafe.org Any opinions, findings, conclusions, or recommendations expressed in this publication do not necessarily reflect the views of FEMA. Additionally, neither FEMA nor any of its employees makes any warrantee, expressed or implied, or assumes any legal liability or responsibility for the accuracy, completeness, or usefulness of any information, product, or process included in this publication. Users of information contained in this publication assume all liability arising from such use. Safe Rooms for Tornadoes and Hurricanes Guidance for Community and Residential Safe Rooms FEMA P-361, Third Edition / March 2015 Preface ederal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) publications presenting design and construction guidance for both residential and community safe rooms have been available since 1998. Since that time, thousands Fof safe rooms have been built, and a growing number of these safe rooms have already saved lives in actual events. There has not been a single reported failure of a safe room constructed to FEMA criteria. Nevertheless, FEMA has modified its Recommended Criteria as a result of post-disaster investigations into the performance of safe rooms and storm shelters after tornadoes and hurricanes.
    [Show full text]
  • Types of Foundations
    Lecture Note COSC 421 1 (M.E. Haque) TYPES OF FOUNDATIONS Foundation Systems Shallow Foundation Deep Foundation Pile Foundation Pier (Caisson) Foundation Isolated spread Wall footings Combined Cantilever or footings footings strap footings Raft or Mat foundation Lecture Note COSC 421 2 (M.E. Haque) Shallow Foundations – are usually located no more than 6 ft below the lowest finished floor. A shallow foundation system generally used when (1) the soil close the ground surface has sufficient bearing capacity, and (2) underlying weaker strata do not result in undue settlement. The shallow foundations are commonly used most economical foundation systems. Footings are structural elements, which transfer loads to the soil from columns, walls or lateral loads from earth retaining structures. In order to transfer these loads properly to the soil, footings must be design to • Prevent excessive settlement • Minimize differential settlement, and • Provide adequate safety against overturning and sliding. Types of Footings Column Footing Isolated spread footings under individual columns. These can be square, rectangular, or circular. Lecture Note COSC 421 3 (M.E. Haque) Wall Footing Wall footing is a continuous slab strip along the length of wall. Lecture Note COSC 421 4 (M.E. Haque) Columns Footing Combined Footing Property line Combined footings support two or more columns. These can be rectangular or trapezoidal plan. Lecture Note COSC 421 5 (M.E. Haque) Property line Cantilever or strap footings: These are similar to combined footings, except that the footings under columns are built independently, and are joined by strap beam. Lecture Note COSC 421 6 (M.E. Haque) Columns Footing Mat or Raft Raft or Mat foundation: This is a large continuous footing supporting all the columns of the structure.
    [Show full text]
  • SOHO Design in the Near Future
    Rochester Institute of Technology RIT Scholar Works Theses 12-2005 SOHO design in the near future SooJung Lee Follow this and additional works at: https://scholarworks.rit.edu/theses Recommended Citation Lee, SooJung, "SOHO design in the near future" (2005). Thesis. Rochester Institute of Technology. Accessed from This Thesis is brought to you for free and open access by RIT Scholar Works. It has been accepted for inclusion in Theses by an authorized administrator of RIT Scholar Works. For more information, please contact [email protected]. Rochester Institute of Technology A thesis Submitted to the Faculty of The College of Imaging Arts and Sciences In Candidacy for the Degree of Master of Fine Arts SOHO Design in the near future By SooJung Lee Dec. 2005 Approvals Chief Advisor: David Morgan David Morgan Date Associate Advisor: Nancy Chwiecko Nancy Chwiecko Date S z/ -tJ.b Associate Advisor: Stan Rickel Stan Rickel School Chairperson: Patti Lachance Patti Lachance Date 3 -..,2,2' Ob I, SooJung Lee, hereby grant permission to the Wallace Memorial Library of RIT to reproduce my thesis in whole or in part. Any reproduction will not be for commercial use or profit. Signature SooJung Lee Date __3....:....V_6-'-/_o_6 ____ _ Special thanks to Prof. David Morgan, Prof. Stan Rickel and Prof. Nancy Chwiecko - my amazing professors who always trust and encourage me sincerity but sometimes make me confused or surprised for leading me into better way for three years. Prof. Chan hong Min and Prof. Kwanbae Kim - who introduced me about the attractive
    [Show full text]
  • Marina Bay Sands Hotel Arch 631 Kayla Brittany Maria Michelle Overall Information
    Marina Bay Sands Hotel Arch 631 Kayla Brittany Maria Michelle Overall Information Location: Singapore Date of Completion: 2010 Cost: $5.7 billion Architect: Moshe Safdie Executive Architect: Aedas, Pte Ltd. Structural Engineer: Arup Landscape Architects: Peter Walker and Partners Landscape Architects Height: 57 Stories (197 m, 640 ft) Design Concept • General parameters of the design were • EXPLORE (new living and lifestyle options) • EXCHANGE (new business ideas) • ENTERTAIN (rich cultural experiences) • 55 Stories of hotel • Garden on top of 1 hectare • 150 m (492 ft) infinity pool • Primary driving element of design was the need for a continuous atrium running along all three towers • Tapering of the building was then conceived Foundation Design • Built on reclaimed land • http://vimeo.com/18140 564 • Layers • Deepest layer is stiff-to-hard Old Alluvium (OA) • Middle layer (5m- 35m thick) is Kallang Formation made of deep soft clay marine deposits with some firm clay and medium dense sand of fluvial origin mixed in • Top layer (12m-15m thick) is sand infill Old Alluvium (OA) Layer • Used a forest of barrettes and 1m-3m diameter bored piles • Average excavation depth was 20m • 2.8 cubed Mm of fill and marine clay taken from site Cofferdams • Diaphragm walls used for minimum strutting • 5 reinforced concrete cofferdams – Circular • 2-120m diameter • 1-103 diameter – Peanut shaped (twin-celled) • 75m diameter – Semi-circular • 65m radius • Each was a dry enclosure – Construction carried out without need for conventional temporary support
    [Show full text]
  • In the Greeting That Arch Klumph Made to the Rotarians at the 1917 Rotary International Convention in Atlanta, He Said
    VISIT DISTRICT 6630's FOUNDATION CENTENNIAL WEBSITE AT TRF100.ORG In the greeting that Arch Klumph made to the Rotarians at the 1917 Rotary International Convention in Atlanta, he said “We are gathered here today, a band of loyal, tired, and true members of the most worthy organization, Consecrated to the doctrine of service in all that the word implies.” Arch C. Klumph believed that Rotary would Brighten all eternity when he proclaimed in December 1928 “The Rotary Foundation is not to build monuments of brick and stone. If we work upon marble, it will perish; if we work on brass, time will efface it; if we raise temples they will crumble into dust; but if we work upon immortal minds…we are engraving on those tablets something that will brighten all eternity. Rotary is built by men made of good stuff; the ideal of service is developing into practice. As a consequence, the organization will never stand still.” — The Father of The Rotary Foundation was A Rotarian with a dream. A dream that he followed for 30 years, telling Rotarians what an endowment fund could do for Rotary and the communities of the world. Arch C. Klumph was a charter member and past president of the Rotary Club of Cleveland. He was Rotary International’s sixth president, creator of the district system for Rotary Clubs and the Father of The Rotary Foundation of Rotary International. This is the Arch Klumph that you all know. I would like to introduce you to the real Arch Klumph: He was born in Conneautville, Pennsylvania on the 6th of June 1869, and he is a direct descendent on the maternal side of James Fenimore Cooper, the American novelist.
    [Show full text]
  • Types of Deep Foundations -Timber Piles - Reinforced Concrete Piles - Pifs - Steel Piles - Composite Piles - Augercast Shafts - Drilled Shafts
    Foundation Engineering Lecture #14 Types of Deep Foundations -Timber piles - Reinforced Concrete piles - PIFs - Steel piles - Composite piles - Augercast shafts - Drilled shafts L. Prieto-Portar 2009 Surface soils with poor bearing may force engineers to carry their structural loads to deeper strata, where the soil and rock strengths are capable of carrying the new loads. These structural elements are called “deep foundations”. The oldest known deep foundation was a “pile”. Originally, piles were simply tree trunks stripped of their branches, and pounded into the soil with a large stone, much like a carpenter hammers a nail into a wooden board. Pile driving machines have been found in Egyptian excavations, consisting of a simple "A" frame, a heavy stone and a rope. Roman military bridge builders used a similar technique. Both were early examples of “driven” piles. In 1740 Christopher Phloem invented pile driving equipment using a steam machine which resembles today’s pile driving mechanisms. This method evolved by using steam to raise the weights (in lieu of human power) during the late 1800’s, and then diesel hammers were developed in Germany during WWII. The most recent advance in pile placing is the hydraulic hammer. Steel piles have been used since 1800’s and concrete piles since about 1900. In contrast, shafts or placed deep foundations are screwed (“augered”) into the soil, much like a carpenter places a screw into a wooden board. Similarly to the contrast between nailing versus screwing, the shafts are usually a quiet operation that tends to improve the soil and rock texture to carry the load.
    [Show full text]
  • Setting up Shop Ways to Manage Your Family Foundation
    Managing in Support of the Charitable Mission ..........................117 CONTENTS Assessing What Work Must Be Done ..........................................117 Deciding How the Work Can Be Done ........................................118 Recruiting Family Volunteer Staff ........................................119 Deciding to Hire Paid Staff..................................................121 Should the Foundation Pay Compensation or Reimbursement?................................................................122 What the Law Says ............................................................122 What the Law Means ..........................................................123 Questions for the Board........................................................123 Family Participation ............................................................124 Developing a Compensation and Reimbursement Policy ....124 Finding an Alternative to Compensation ............................125 On the Outside Looking In ................................................126 Sharing Staff ........................................................................126 Using Consultants................................................................128 Moving to a Full-Time Paid Executive Director ................129 Determining Where the Work Will Be Done ................................129 Using a Home Office ..........................................................129 Using the Family Office ......................................................130 Relying on the
    [Show full text]
  • The Influence of the Arch
    The Influence of the Arch The Influence of the Arch by ReadWorks The lasting influence of ancient Rome is apparent in many areas of our contemporary society. Sophisticated elements of law, engineering, literature, philosophy, architecture, and art can all be traced back to the Roman Empire. But perhaps one of the most lasting contributions from Roman civilization is something we see nearly every day: the Roman arch. An arch is a curved structure designed to support or strengthen a building. Arches are traditionally made of stone, brick, or concrete; some modern arches are made of steel or laminated wood. The wedge-shaped blocks that form the sides of an arch are called voussoirs, and the top center stone, called the keystone, is the last block to be inserted. During construction, the arch is supported from below before the keystone is put in. The curve of an arch may take different shapes, but it is often a rounded or pointed semicircle. Although the Romans revolutionized the arch, the structure has been around since before them. The Assyrians used arches to construct vaulted chambers or underground drains. However, these early arches were only suitable for small structures. The designs weren't sophisticated enough to support larger edifices, like palaces or government buildings. The Romans, however, improved the arch and made it strong enough for large-scale, widespread use. By developing an arch capable of supporting huge amounts of weight, they laid the groundwork for some of the most important advancements in architectural history. The arch became a vital feature of bridges, gates, sewers, and aqueducts, which in turn were integral to the modernization of cities.
    [Show full text]
  • Raised Wood Floor Design & Construction Options
    Raised Wood Floor Design & Construction Options Presented by: Bruce Cordova Innovative Design Alternative NAHB Consumer Preference Study . 42% of consumers prefer wood framed first floors . 25% prefer concrete slabs Photos show Habitat for Humanity homes in Gulfport, MS. Raised Floor Benefits Champion Homes “They choose the raised one…” – Billy Ward Champion Builders, Port Allen, LA President, Baton Rouge HBA Tilson Homes “Our focus study revealed that homebuyers in Texas believe a RWF is a custom upgrade…a slab house gives a production builder feel.” – Robert Kennedy, Tilson Homes, Houston, TX Raised Wood Floor Benefits . Curb Appeal . Comfortable Walking Surface . Classic Style . Traditional Neighborhood Streetscapes . Decks & Porches Extend Living Space . Simplified Future Repairs and Renovations . Increased Resale Values “A home should have a top, middle, and a base.” – Kevin Harris, Architect Numerous Advantages Simple inspections Easy maintenance Less & improvements expensive to repair than slab Builders RWF Cost Assumptions “I like raised wood floors, but they’re $10,000 – $15,000 more than slab-on-grade.” – Mike Feigin Design Tech Homes, Houston, TX “We only offer raised wood floors because they are more cost effective than slab-on-grade. It’s the lowest cost method we can build.” – Lowell Pinnock, United-Bilt Homes, Houston, TX B.C. Daniels Incorporated Mobile, AL APA and CAWS launched a cost study to be conducted by NAHB – Research Center: .3 Raised Wood Floors .3 Slab-On-Grade .3 Elevated Slabs The 99K House Houston, TX www.the99khouse.com Jimmy & Rosalynn Carter Build Cows choose Raised Wood Floors Top 3 Federal Flood Disasters Before Katrina/Rita Storm Date Payout Claims TS Allison 6/2001 $1.1 billion 30,274 H.
    [Show full text]
  • Foundation Decision Tree Options for Improving Basements and Crawlspaces
    FOUNDATION ENERGY SAVING RECIPE Foundation Decision Tree Options for Improving Basements and Crawlspaces Basement and Crawlspace Definitions Unconditioned – The The Thermal Envelope location is not mechanically Determine where the best location for the thermal conditioned. Any ducts in the envelope exists in your home with a basement space must be insulated. and/or crawlspace by assessing the objectives for Conditioned – The location the space. Do you want to safely store objects in a is mechanically conditioned. space with low humidity and temperature swings? Ductwork in the space is If so, then consider sealing and insulating the wall usually insulated but it is not system - making the space indirectly-conditioned. required to be. If the space dictates a ventilated approach then seal and insulate the floor to mitigate water and Indirectly Conditioned – humidity issues. The location is not directly mechanically conditioned but is indirectly conditioned due to thermal connectivity with directly conditioned spaces. Uninsulated ductwork in the Basements and crawlspaces represent two of the three main foundation choices for homes; the third option being space may cause it to be slab on grade foundations. indirectly conditioned. Framed floor assemblies over basements and crawlspaces date back to a time before concrete slab foundations were Finished Space – Full common and are still employed today. The fundamental details usually consist of a wood framed joist assembly with height locations that are subfloor material (e.g., diagonal 1x or plywood/OSB) and finished flooring material which serves as the main floor of livable. Finished spaces are the building. usually directly mechanically conditioned. Basements conditioned or indirectly conditioned.
    [Show full text]
  • 780 Cmr 60.00 Chimneys, Fireplaces and Solid Fuel-Burning Appliances
    780 CMR 60.00 CHIMNEYS, FIREPLACES AND SOLID FUEL-BURNING APPLIANCES 780 CMR 6001 MASONRY CHIMNEYS least two feet (610 mm) higher than any portion of a 6001.1 General. Masonry chimneys shall be building within 10 feet (3048 mm), but shall not be constructed, anchored, supported and reinforced as less than three feet (914 mm) above the highest point required in 780 CMR 60.00 and the applicable where the chimney passes through the roof. provisions of 780 CMR 53.00, 54.00 and 56.00. 6001.6.1 Spark Arrestors. Where a spark Chimneys shall be structurally sound, durable, arrestor is installed on a masonry chimney, the smoke tight and capable of conveying flue gases to spark arrestor shall meet all of the following the exterior safely. requirements: 6001.1.1 Support. Masonry chimneys shall be 1. The net free area of the arrestor shall not be supported on foundations of solid masonry or less than four times the net free area of the concrete at least 12 inches (305 mm) thick and at outlet of the chimney flue it serves. least six inches (152 mm) beyond each side of the 2. The arrestor screen shall have heat and exterior dimensions of the chimney. Footings corrosion resistance equivalent to 19-gage shall be founded on natural, undisturbed earth galvanized steel or 24-gage stainless steel. below the frostline. In areas not subject to 3. Openings shall not permit the passage of freezing, footings shall be located a minimum of spheres having a diameter greater than ½ inch 12 inches (305 mm) below finished grade.
    [Show full text]