DOCSLIB.ORG

British Rainfall 1967

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text

Load more

Met. 0. 853 METEOROLOGICAL OFFICE British Rainfall 1967 THE ONE HUNDRED AND SEVENTH ANNUAL VOLUME LONDON: HER MAJESTY'S STATIONERY OFFICE: 1973 U.D.C. 551.506.1 © Crown Copyright 1973 HER MAJESTY'S STATIONERY OFFICE Government Bookshops 49 High Holborn, London WC1V 6HB 13a Castle Street, Edinburgh EH2 3AR 109 St Mary Street, Cardiff CF1 1JW Brazennose Street, Manchester M60 8AS 50 Fairfax Street, Bristol BS1 3DE 258 Broad Street, Birmingham Bl 2HE 80 Chichester Street, Belfast BT1 4JY Government publications are also available through booksellers SBN 11 400250 9* Printed in England for Her Majesty's Stationery Office by Manor Farm Press, Alperton, Wembley, Middlesex Dd 507005 K7 5/73 Contents Page Introduction 1 Part I General table of rainfall Index to areal grouping of rainfall stations 5 General table of rainfall monthly and annual totals with amounts and dates of maximum daily falls 7 Part II Summary tables, maps and graphs with discussion 1 Main characteristics of the year 99 2 Monthly, annual and seasonal rainfall 101 3 Spells of rainfall deficiency and excess 123 4 Frequency distribution of daily amounts of rain 137 5 Heavy falls on rainfall days 152 6 Heavy falls in short periods 169 7 Evaporation and percolation 175 8 Potential evapotranspiration 180 Part III Special articles 1 Potential evapotranspiration data, 1967, by F. H. W. Green 184 2 Snow survey of Great Britain, season 1966-67, by R. E. Booth 191 3 Estimates and measurements of potential evaporation and evapotranspiration for operational hydrology, by B. G. Wales-Smith 203 111 LISTS OF MAPS AND GRAPHS PARTS I AND II Page Parti Areal grouping of rainfall stations 4 Part II Monthly rainfall, percentage of annual average, January to December (12 maps) 105 Seasonal rainfall, percentage of annual average, Winter half-year (October 1966-March 1967) 117 Summer half-year (April 1967-September 1967) 118 Seasonal year (October 1966-September 1967) 119 Rainfall 1967, percentage of annual average 120 Rainfall 1967, millimetres with inch equivalents 121 Percentage departures of cumulative rainfall: map showing distrib­ ution of stations included in Table 3A and graphs 125 Graphs illustrating spells of rainfall deficiency and excess (19 stations) 129 Number of rainfall days with 1-0 mm or more, 2-5 mm or more, and 10-0 mm or more, seasonal half-years and calendar year (9 maps) 143 Rainfall of 27 February: northern England, Wales to south-west England 160 24 March: central and western Scotland 161 3 May: Wales and south-west England 162 14 May: Midlands and northern England 163 24 June: Shropshire to Tees-side 164 13 July: north-west England, Wales to Oxfordshire 165 22 July: south-west and southern England 166 29 July: south Wales 166 16 October: England and Wales and Isle of Man 167 5 November: north-east England 168 LIST OF TABLES, PART II Table 1 Estimated areal rainfall, monthly, annual and seasonal, for parts of the United Kingdom A Averages 1916-50 in millimetres 100 B Values for 1967 in millimetres 100 C Values for 1967, percentage of annual average. 1916-50 100 2 Monthly, annual and seasonal rainfall for individual stations, percentage of ann ual average, 1916-50 101 3A Percentage departures of cumulative rainfall 126 3B The calendar year divided into 73 five-day groups, or pentads 128 4 Frequency distributions of daily amounts 138 5 Chronicle of heavy falls on rainfall days 153 6 A Frequency distributions of intense falls 170 6B Heavy falls in short periods 173 6C Heavy falls in short periods. Supplementary list 174 7A Evaporation from standard tanks 176 7B Rainfall, percolation and inferred evaporation 178 7C Rainfall, drainage observations and inferred evaporation 179 8 Calculated potential evapotranspiration 181 IV Introduction No important changes in the presentation of data over the areas draining down to the R.F.M. stations have been introduced with this volume of British are given. Rainfall. However, all data are published in metric units for the first time, including those in special In order to publish as much useful data as possible, articles in Part III, individual authors having kindly marginally incomplete records have been completed provided metric versions of their articles in place of by estimation of the missing data. Values estimated the versions prepared with British units some years for missing data for England and Wales are included earlier. in brackets. Because of certain complexities in the change from manual methods to computer methods As in all the volumes since the 1961 edition, the river of producing the General Table and other tabular flow measurement stations are included in their material, this practice of using brackets for estimated appropriate places in the General Table and are values was not thoroughly carried out for Scotland indicated by the abbreviation 'R.F.M.Sta.'. Where and Northern Ireland in the present volume nor in the available, the 1916-50 average annual areal rainfalls volume for 1966. BRITISH RAINFALL 1967 Part I General table of rainfall AREAL GROUPING OF RAINFALL STATIONS based on drainage areas See page opposite for index KILOMETRES 0 20 40 80 80 100 120 140 160 L MM 0 *»1«/t«i/l44|4Llllll 4 INDEX TO AREAL GROUPING OF RAINFALL STATIONS Hydro- Hydro- metric metric Area area Page Area area Page England and Wales Scotland River authority area River purification board area Northumbrian 22-25 7 Solway 77-81 70 Yorkshire Ouse and Hull 26,27 9 Ayrshire 82,83 71 Trent 28 15 Clyde 84-87 72 Lincolnshire 29, 30 20 Welland and Nene 31,32 21 Hydrometric area grouping Great Ouse 33 23 Kin tyre and south-western islands 104 75 East Suffolk and Norfolk 34,35 25 Add, Awe and Etive 88, 89 75 Essex 36, 37 27 Lochy and Linnhe 90, 91 76 Shiel, Alsh and Maree 92-94 77 Inner and Outer Hebrides 77 Conservancy area or London 105, 106 area Laxford 95 78 Lee 38 29 78 London, left Naver and Thurso 96, 97 bank 39 30 Orkney and Shetland Islands 107, 108 78 Thames 39 31 79 London, right bank Wick Water to Conon 1-4 39 35 Beauly and Ness 5, 6 80 River authority area River purification board area Kent 40 36 Banff, Moray and Nairn 7-9 81 Sussex 41 39 Dee and Don 10-12 82 Hampshire 42 41 North and South Esk 13 83 Isle of Wight 101 42 Tay 14-16 83 Avon and Dorset 43,44 42 Forth 17, 18 85 Devon, south 45,46 43 Lothians 19,20 87 Cornwall 47-49 45 Tweed 21 88 Devon, north 50, 51D 47 Northern Ireland Somerset 51S, 52 48 Bristol Avon 53 49 Drainage area grouping Severn 54 50 Foyle and north-western streams 91 Wye 55 54 Lough Foyle, east 91 Usk 56 56 Bann and Lough Neagh 92 Glamorgan 57,58 57 Bush and north-eastern streams 93 South West Wales 59-63 58 Lagan and eastern streams 93 Gwynedd 64-66G, 102 59 Newry and south-eastern streams 94 Dee and Clwyd 66D, 67 60 Erne and western streams 94 Mersey and Weaver 68,69 62 Channel Islands Lancashire 70-74L 65 Alderney 95 Cumberland 74C-76 67 Guernsey 95 Sark 95 Isle of Man 103 69 Jersey 95 Notes: Part of hydrometric area 21 (Tweed) and part of hydro- burn, Etal R.F.M. station and Berwick-on-Tweed under area metric area 77 (Esk) are in England but stations within these 21 (Tweed), and Ashycroft and Longtown under area 77 (Esk). parts are listed with appropriate stations in Scotland so as to be The National Grid reference system is used for locating rainfall grouped within the natural drainage areas to which they belong. stations in Great Britain, the Irish Grid for stations in Northern These stations are Linhope, Lilburn Tower, Chillingham Barns, Ireland, and the Universal Transverse Mercator (Zone 30U) for Middleton Hall, Mindrum, Goldscleugh, Hethpool, Pallins- stations in the Channel Islands. GENERAL TABLE, ENGLAND AND WALES Av. Highest recorded Grid Alti­ 1916- Rainfall in millimetres fall in a day Station reference tude 1950 m mm Jan Feb Mar ( Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec Year mm date England and Wales NORTHUMBRIAN RIVER AUTHORITY AREA, 9211 SQUARE KILOMETRES HYDROMETRIC AREAS 22(including Till) TO 25 Coastal Newlands ... ... ... NU46 116324 58 657 28 57 26 24 131 40 64 54 55 77 131 47 733 50 5 Nov Seahouses... ... ... NU46 197341 11 35 57 37 25 134 37 70 55 44 74 111 40 718 52 5 Nov Newton House NU 46 235253 23 690 36 57 33 20 124 37 77 52 47 74 117 38 713 56 5 Nov Stamford ... ... ... NU46 223193 53 706 35 65 30 22 129 45 77 61 47 76 129 46 762 52 5 Nov HowickHall ... ... NU 46 246177 34 751 38 56 35 19 129 48 84 65 57 80 119 43 772 43 5 Nov Aln Callaly Castle ... ... NU46 051099 104 812 53 73 38 37 144 56 75 74 69 101 125 56 901 44 5 Nov Whittingham ... ... NU 46 0691 17 76 762 43 62 34 33 136 56 59 61 61 103 123 49 817 43 5 Nov Coquet Blindburn ... ... ... NT 36 829109 307 1002 75 102 61 68 144 54 93 72 77 159 166 62 1132 72 5 Nov Bygate R.F.M. Sta. Area 59.6 km1 ... NT 36 870083 213 1053 I/sway (Coquet) Shillmoor R.F.M. Sta. Area 21.4 km1 ... NT 36 886077 207 1103 Coquet Rothbury ... ... ... NU46 055013 91 877 52 68 42 38 110 46 80 79 75 115 123 51 878 58 16 Oct Amble ..
Recommended publications
  • Infrastructure Report 2

    Infrastructure Report 2

    Infrastructure is the basic physical and organisational facilities needed for a community to function and grow.. The capacity, quality and accessibility of services and facilities are all critical factors in ensuring that people can enjoy living, working and visiting our town. Infrastructure Requirements to Enable Growth Liskeard Neighbourhood Plan Liskeard Neighbourhood Plan Steering Group Liskeard Neighbourhood Plan Infrastructure to Enable Growth Infrastructure is the basic physical and organisational facilities needed for a community to function and grow. When planning for the long-term growth of Liskeard, it is vital that new development is supported by the necessary infrastructure, and that existing inadequacies are resolved. The capacity, quality and accessibility of services and facilities are all critical factors in ensuring that people can enjoy living, working and visiting our town. This report notes the infrastructure needs estimated to meet the requirements of the Cornwall Local Plan (as at July 2016) i.e. the needs of the new population generated by 1400 additional dwellings and the traffic/drainage requirements of up to 17.55 ha of employment land. It also notes where infrastructure is already inadequate and proposes improvements where possible. In assessing the infrastructure need, reference has been made to: Cornwall Infrastructure Needs Assessment – Liskeard & Looe Schedule Cornwall Community Infrastructure Levy webpages Planning Future Cornwall – Infrastructure Planning: Town Framework Evidence Base 2012 Cornwall Local Plan Open Space Strategy for Larger Towns 2014 Education Primary – There are currently 2 primary schools within the Liskeard Neighbourhood Plan Area (Liskeard Hillfort Primary and St Martin’s CE Primary) which can cater for approximately 735 pupils, but which had only 653 on-roll in January 2016, a surplus of 82 places.
  • Environment Agency South West Region

    Environment Agency South West Region

    ENVIRONMENT AGENCY SOUTH WEST REGION 1997 ANNUAL HYDROMETRIC REPORT Environment Agency Manley House, Kestrel Way Sowton Industrial Estate Exeter EX2 7LQ Tel 01392 444000 Fax 01392 444238 GTN 7-24-X 1000 Foreword The 1997 Hydrometric Report is the third document of its kind to be produced since the formation of the Environment Agency (South West Region) from the National Rivers Authority, Her Majesty Inspectorate of Pollution and Waste Regulation Authorities. The document is the fourth in a series of reports produced on an annua! basis when all available data for the year has been archived. The principal purpose of the report is to increase the awareness of the hydrometry within the South West Region through listing the current and historic hydrometric networks, key hydrometric staff contacts, what data is available and the reporting options available to users. If you have any comments regarding the content or format of this report then please direct these to the Regional Hydrometric Section at Exeter. A questionnaire is attached to collate your views on the annual hydrometric report. Your time in filling in the questionnaire is appreciated. ENVIRONMENT AGENCY Contents Page number 1.1 Introduction.............................. .................................................... ........-................1 1.2 Hydrometric staff contacts.................................................................................. 2 1.3 South West Region hydrometric network overview......................................3 2.1 Hydrological summary: overview
  • Reconstructing Palaeoenvironments of the White Peak Region of Derbyshire, Northern England

    Reconstructing Palaeoenvironments of the White Peak Region of Derbyshire, Northern England

    THE UNIVERSITY OF HULL Reconstructing Palaeoenvironments of the White Peak Region of Derbyshire, Northern England being a Thesis submitted for the Degree of Doctor of Philosophy in the University of Hull by Simon John Kitcher MPhysGeog May 2014 Declaration I hereby declare that the work presented in this thesis is my own, except where otherwise stated, and that it has not been previously submitted in application for any other degree at any other educational institution in the United Kingdom or overseas. ii Abstract Sub-fossil pollen from Holocene tufa pool sediments is used to investigate middle – late Holocene environmental conditions in the White Peak region of the Derbyshire Peak District in northern England. The overall aim is to use pollen analysis to resolve the relative influence of climate and anthropogenic landscape disturbance on the cessation of tufa production at Lathkill Dale and Monsal Dale in the White Peak region of the Peak District using past vegetation cover as a proxy. Modern White Peak pollen – vegetation relationships are examined to aid semi- quantitative interpretation of sub-fossil pollen assemblages. Moss-polsters and vegetation surveys incorporating novel methodologies are used to produce new Relative Pollen Productivity Estimates (RPPE) for 6 tree taxa, and new association indices for 16 herb taxa. RPPE’s of Alnus, Fraxinus and Pinus were similar to those produced at other European sites; Betula values displaying similarity with other UK sites only. RPPE’s for Fagus and Corylus were significantly lower than at other European sites. Pollen taphonomy in woodland floor mosses in Derbyshire and East Yorkshire is investigated.
  • COMBINED QUALITY and VALUE ASSESSMENT 2015 Avenue

    COMBINED QUALITY and VALUE ASSESSMENT 2015 Avenue

    COMBINED QUALITY AND VALUE ASSESSMENT 2015 Park Name Area Ward Hectarage Quality Value High/ Low Childs Hill Park Golders Green & Finchley Childs Hill 3.02 GOOD Good High/High Edgwarebury Park Hendon Edgware 15.95 GOOD Good High/High Golders Hill Park Golders Green & Finchley Childs Hill 14.50 EXCELLENT Good High/High Hendon Park Hendon West Hendon 11.87 GOOD Excellent High/High Heybourne Park Hendon Colindale 6.24 GOOD Good High/High Lyttelton Playing Field Golders Green & Finchley Garden Suburb 9.59 GOOD Fair High/High Malcolm Park Hendon West Hendon 1.90 GOOD Good High/High Mill Hill Park Hendon Mill Hill 18.66 GOOD Good High/High Oak Hill Park Chipping Barnet East Barnet 33.48 GOOD Good High/High Old Court House Recreation Ground Chipping Barnet Underhill 3.08 GOOD Good High/High Victoria Park Golders Green & Finchley West Finchley 7.53 GOOD Good High/High Avenue House Golders Green & Finchley Finchley Church End 4.32 GOOD Poor High/Low Cricklewood Playground Golders Green & Finchley Childs Hill 0.28 GOOD Fair High/Low Hampstead Heath extension Golders Green & Finchley Garden Suburb 30.27 GOOD Fair High/Low Arrandene Open Space Hendon Mill Hill 23.43 FAIR Good Low/High Ashbourne Grove OS Hendon Hale 0.16 FAIR Fair Low/High Barnet Gate Wood Chipping Barnet Underhill 7.89 FAIR Fair Low/High Barnet Hill Open Space Chipping Barnet Underhill 1.63 FAIR Fair Low/High Barnet Playing Field Chipping Barnet Underhill 12.37 FAIR Good Low/High Brent Green Open Space Hendon Hendon 0.29 FAIR Fair Low/High Brent Park Hendon Hendon 3.44 FAIR Good Low/High
  • Archaeological Desk Based Assessment

    Archaeological Desk Based Assessment

    Archaeological Desk Based Assessment __________ Brockley Hill, Stanmore - New Banqueting Facility, Brockley Hill, London Borough of Harrow Brockley Hill DBA Update | 1 June 2020 | Project Ref 6129A Project Number: 06129A File Origin: P:\HC\Projects\Projects 6001-6500\6101 - 6200\06129 - Former Stanmore and Edgware Golf Club, Brockley Hill\AC\Reports\2020.08.25 - Brockley Hill DBAv3.docx Author with date Reviewer code, with date AJ, 25.02.2020 RD-0023, 25.02.2020 JM-0057,13.08.202019 JM, 25.08.2020 HGH Consulting, 15.08.2020 Brockley Hill DBA Update | 2 Contents Non-Technical Summary 1. Introduction ........................................................................................ 6 2. Methodology ...................................................................................... 13 3. Relevant Policy Framework ............................................................... 16 4. Archaeological Background ............................................................... 21 5. Proposed Development, Assessment of Significance and Potential Effects ............................................................................................... 37 6. Conclusions ....................................................................................... 41 7. Sources Consulted ............................................................................. 43 8. Figures .............................................................................................. 46 Appendices Appendix 1: Greater London Historic Environment Record Data Figures
  • Environmental Protection Final Draft Report

    Environmental Protection Final Draft Report

    Environmental Protection Final Draft Report ANNUAL CLASSIFICATION OF RIVER WATER QUALITY 1992: NUMBERS OF SAMPLES EXCEEDING THE QUALITY STANDARD June 1993 FWS/93/012 Author: R J Broome Freshwater Scientist NRA C.V.M. Davies National Rivers Authority Environmental Protection Manager South West R egion ANNUAL CLASSIFICATION OF RIVER WATER QUALITY 1992: NUMBERS OF SAMPLES EXCEEDING TOE QUALITY STANDARD - FWS/93/012 This report shows the number of samples taken and the frequency with which individual determinand values failed to comply with National Water Council river classification standards, at routinely monitored river sites during the 1992 classification period. Compliance was assessed at all sites against the quality criterion for each determinand relevant to the River Water Quality Objective (RQO) of that site. The criterion are shown in Table 1. A dashed line in the schedule indicates no samples failed to comply. This report should be read in conjunction with Water Quality Technical note FWS/93/005, entitled: River Water Quality 1991, Classification by Determinand? where for each site the classification for each individual determinand is given, together with relevant statistics. The results are grouped in catchments for easy reference, commencing with the most south easterly catchments in the region and progressing sequentially around the coast to the most north easterly catchment. ENVIRONMENT AGENCY 110221i i i H i m NATIONAL RIVERS AUTHORITY - 80UTH WEST REGION 1992 RIVER WATER QUALITY CLASSIFICATION NUMBER OF SAMPLES (N) AND NUMBER
  • Brent Valley & Barnet Plateau Area Framework All London Green Grid

    Brent Valley & Barnet Plateau Area Framework All London Green Grid

    All Brent Valley & Barnet Plateau London Area Framework Green Grid 11 DRAFT Contents 1 Foreword and Introduction 2 All London Green Grid Vision and Methodology 3 ALGG Framework Plan 4 ALGG Area Frameworks 5 ALGG Governance 6 Area Strategy 9 Area Description 10 Strategic Context 11 Vision 14 Objectives 16 Opportunities 20 Project Identification 22 Clusters 24 Projects Map 28 Rolling Projects List 34 Phase One Early Delivery 36 Project Details 48 Forward Strategy 50 Gap Analysis 51 Recommendations 52 Appendices 54 Baseline Description 56 ALGG SPG Chapter 5 GGA11 Links 58 Group Membership Note: This area framework should be read in tandem with All London Green Grid SPG Chapter 5 for GGA11 which contains statements in respect of Area Description, Strategic Corridors, Links and Opportunities. The ALGG SPG document is guidance that is supplementary to London Plan policies. While it does not have the same formal development plan status as these policies, it has been formally adopted by the Mayor as supplementary guidance under his powers under the Greater London Authority Act 1999 (as amended). Adoption followed a period of public consultation, and a summary of the comments received and the responses of the Mayor to those comments is available on the Greater London Authority website. It will therefore be a material consideration in drawing up development plan documents and in taking planning decisions. The All London Green Grid SPG was developed in parallel with the area frameworks it can be found at the following link: http://www.london.gov.uk/publication/all-london- green-grid-spg . Cover Image: View across Silver Jubilee Park to the Brent Reservoir Foreword 1 Introduction – All London Green Grid Vision and Methodology Introduction Area Frameworks Partnership - Working The various and unique landscapes of London are Area Frameworks help to support the delivery of Strong and open working relationships with many recognised as an asset that can reinforce character, the All London Green Grid objectives.
  • LBR 2007 Front Matter V5.1

    LBR 2007 Front Matter V5.1

    1 London Bird Report No.72 for the year 2007 Accounts of birds recorded within a 20-mile radius of St Paul's Cathedral A London Natural History Society Publication Published April 2011 2 LONDON BIRD REPORT NO. 72 FOR 2007 3 London Bird Report for 2007 produced by the LBR Editorial Board Contents Introduction and Acknowledgements – Pete Lambert 5 Rarities Committee, Recorders and LBR Editors 7 Recording Arrangements 8 Map of the Area and Gazetteer of Sites 9 Review of the Year 2007 – Pete Lambert 16 Contributors to the Systematic List 22 Birds of the London Area 2007 30 Swans to Shelduck – Des McKenzie Dabbling Ducks – David Callahan Diving Ducks – Roy Beddard Gamebirds – Richard Arnold and Rebecca Harmsworth Divers to Shag – Ian Woodward Herons – Gareth Richards Raptors – Andrew Moon Rails – Richard Arnold and Rebecca Harmsworth Waders – Roy Woodward and Tim Harris Skuas to Gulls – Andrew Gardener Terns to Cuckoo – Surender Sharma Owls to Woodpeckers – Mark Pearson Larks to Waxwing – Sean Huggins Wren to Thrushes – Martin Shepherd Warblers – Alan Lewis Crests to Treecreeper – Jonathan Lethbridge Penduline Tit to Sparrows – Jan Hewlett Finches – Angela Linnell Buntings – Bob Watts Appendix I & II: Escapes & Hybrids – Martin Grounds Appendix III: Non-proven and Non-submitted Records First and Last Dates of Regular Migrants, 2007 170 Ringing Report for 2007 – Roger Taylor 171 Breeding Bird Survey in London, 2007 – Ian Woodward 181 Cannon Hill Common Update – Ron Kettle 183 The establishment of breeding Common Buzzards – Peter Oliver 199
  • Newsletter Jan 2016

    Newsletter Jan 2016

    Derbyshire Archaeological Society Newsletter # 81 (Jan 2015) 1 DERBYSHIRE ARCHAEOLOGICAL SOCIETY NEWSLETTER Issue 81 January 2016 2 Derbyshire Archaeological Society Newsletter # 81 (Jan 2016) DERBYSHIRE ARCHAEOLOGICAL SOCIETY 2015 - 2016 PRESIDENT The Duke of Devonshire KCVO CBE VICE PRESIDENTS MR. J. R. MARJORAM, DR. P. STRANGE, MR. M.A.B. MALLENDER, MRS J. STEER, DR. D.V. FOWKES Chairman Mrs P. Tinkler, 53 Park Lane, Weston on Trent, of Council Derby, DE72 2BR Tel 01332 706716 Email; [email protected] Hon. Treasurer Mr P. Billson, 150 Blenheim Drive, Allestree, Derby, DE22 2GN Tel 01332 550725 e-mail; [email protected] Hon. Secretary Mrs B. A. Foster, 2, The Watermeadows, Swarkestone, Derbyshire, DE73 7FX Tel 01332 704148 e-mail; [email protected] Programme Sec. Mrs M. McGuire, 18 Fairfield Park, Haltwhistle, &Publicity Officer Northumberland. NE49 9HE Tel 01434 322906 e-mail; [email protected] Membership Mr K.A. Reedman, 107, Curzon St, Long Eaton, Secretary Derbyshire, NG10 4FH Tel 0115 9732150 e-mail; [email protected] Hon. Editors Dr. D.V. Fowkes, 11 Sidings Way, Westhouses, (Journal) Alfreton, Derby DE55 5AS Tel 01773 546626 e-mail; [email protected] Miss P. Beswick, 4, Chapel Row, Froggatt, Calver, Hope Valley, S32 3ZA Tel 01433 631256 e-mail; [email protected] Newsletter Editor Mrs B. A. Foster, 2, The Watermeadows, Swarkestone, Derbyshire, DE73 7FX Tel 01332 704148 e-mail; [email protected] Hon Assistant Mr. J.R. Marjoram, Southfield House, Portway, Librarian Coxbench,
  • Institute of 1K Hydrology • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • •

    Institute of 1K Hydrology • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • •

    • Instituteof 1k Hydrology • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • Natural Environment Research Council • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • DERIVATION OF THEORETICAL FLOWS FOR THE COLLIFORD RESERVOIR MODEL (A report of contract work to South West Water Services Ltd under IH project T05056V1) J.R. BLACKIE, C HUGHES and T.KM. SIMPSON Institute of Hydrology • Maclean Building Crowmarsh Gifford Wallingford Oxon OXIO 8138 UK Tel: 0491 38800 Telex: 849365 Hydro! G May 1991 Fax: 0491 32256 CONTENTS Page PROJECT AIMS 1 DATA COLLEC'TION 3 DATA MANAGEMENT 6 COMPUTER MODELLING 7 DERIVATION OF NATURALISED FLOWS 8 5.1 Methods 5.2 Summary of naturalised procedures for each site ASSESSMENT OF MODEL PREDICTIONS 13 CONCLUSIONS 17 FUTURE WORK 19 ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS 20 REFERENCES 21 APPENDIX 1. Notations uscd in the report APPENDIX 2. Notes on modelling and record extension of individual sites • 1. PROJECT AIMS The Colliford Model is a computer model which will represent the Colliford Reservoir System managed by South West Water Services Limited. Theoretical flows will be a major input into this computer model and the Institute of Hydrology was required to generate a record of synthetic natural daily mean flows at specified locations in the Colliford operational rcgion. Data were to be generated for up to fifty years where possible and in units of cumecs. Notes on how the data were derived were to accompany the generated data; a statistical comparison of the synthetic and historical flows is presented in this final report of the project. Synthetic
  • River Water Quality 1992 Classification by Determinand

    River Water Quality 1992 Classification by Determinand

    N f\A - S oo-Ha (jO$*\z'3'Z2 Environmental Protection Final Draft Report RIVER WATER QUALITY 1992 CLASSIFICATION BY DETERMINAND May 1993 Water Quality Technical Note FWS/93/005 Author: R J Broome Freshwater Scientist NRA CV.M. Davies National Rivers A h ority Environmental Protection Manager South West Region RIVER WATER QUALITY 1992 CLASSIFICATION BY DETERMINAND 1. INTRODUCTION River water quality is monitored in 34 catchments in the region. Samples are collected at a minimum frequency of once a month from 422 watercourses at 890 locations within the Regional Monitoring Network. Each sample is analysed for a range of chemical and physical determinands. These sample results are stored in the Water Quality Archive. A computerised system assigns a quality class to each monitoring location and associated upstream river reach. This report contains the results of the 1992 river water quality classifications for each determinand used in the classification process. 2. RIVER WATER QUALITY ASSESSMENT The assessment of river water quality is by comparison of current water quality against River Quality Objectives (RQO's) which have been set for many river lengths in the region. Individual determinands have been classified in accordance with the requirements of the National Water Council (NWC) river classification system which identifies river water quality as being one of five classes as shown in Table 1 below: TABLE 1 NATIONAL WATER COUNCIL - CLASSIFICATION SYSTEM CLASS DESCRIPTION 1A Good quality IB Lesser good quality 2 Fair quality 3 Poor quality 4 Bad quality The classification criteria used for attributing a quality class to each criteria are shown in Appendix 1.
  • Q.1 How Often Do You Visit a Park Or Open Space in Barnet?

    Q.1 How Often Do You Visit a Park Or Open Space in Barnet?

    A1744 BarnetBarnet OSSOSS CitizensCitizens Pannel Panel SummarySummary Report Q.1 How often do you visit a park or open space in Barnet? Every day Never visit 0% 5% Most days Once a year 21% 2% Two or three times a year 14% Once a month 17% Once or twice a week 28% Once every two weeks 13% No % of total Never visit 37 5.2 Once a year 15 2.1 Two or three times a year 98 13.9 Once a month 122 17.3 Once every two weeks 91 12.9 Once or twice a week 198 28.1 Most days 144 20.4 Every day 0 0.0 A1744A1744 Barnet Barnet OSS OSS Citizens Citizens Panel Pannel Summary Summary Report Report Q.2 Could you please tell us why you don’t visit parks and open spaces in the borough, could you please tell us why. 35 29.7% 30 27.0% 27.0% 27.0% 25 20 15 10.8% 10.8% 10 8.1% 8.1% 5.4% 5.4% 5 0 I do not have I am not I do not feel Barnet’s parks Barnet’s parks Barnet’s parks My health is too There is no I prefer to visit Other time interested in safe visiting and open and open and open poor suitable public parks and open them them spaces do not spaces are not spaces are not transport to get spaces outside offer facilities I easy to get to well maintained to them the borough want No % of total I do not have time 11 29.7 I am not interested in them 3 8.1 I do not feel safe visiting them 10 27.0 Barnetʼs parks and open spaces do not offer faci 4 10.8 Barnetʼs parks and open spaces are not easy to 3 8.1 Barnetʼs parks and open spaces are not well ma 2 5.4 My health is too poor 10 27.0 There is no suitable public transport to get to the 2 5.4 I prefer to visit parks and open spaces outside th 4 10.8 Other 10 27.0 Total responses (as per Q1) 37 Other: I feel uncomfortable visiting parks and open spaces alone not that I don't have a dog.