DOCSLIB.ORG

Interim Hearing on the California State Lottery Initiative Senate Committee on Governmental Organizations

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Interim Hearing on the California State Lottery Initiative Senate Committee on Governmental Organizations Golden Gate University School of Law GGU Law Digital Commons California Senate California Documents 9-10-1984 Interim Hearing on the California State Lottery Initiative Senate Committee on Governmental Organizations Follow this and additional works at: http://digitalcommons.law.ggu.edu/caldocs_senate Part of the Legislation Commons Recommended Citation Senate Committee on Governmental Organizations, "Interim Hearing on the California State Lottery Initiative" (1984). California Senate. Paper 73. http://digitalcommons.law.ggu.edu/caldocs_senate/73 This Hearing is brought to you for free and open access by the California Documents at GGU Law Digital Commons. It has been accepted for inclusion in California Senate by an authorized administrator of GGU Law Digital Commons. For more information, please contact [email protected]. SENATE COMMITTEE ON GOVERNMENTAL /'o~GAN r·zAT :roN TRANSCRIPT OF PROCEEDINGS INTERIM HEARING ON "THE CALIFORNIA STATE LOTTERY INITIATIVE" STATE CAPITOL ROOM 4203 SACRAMENTO, CALIFORNIA September 10, 1984 COMMITTEE MEMBERS: Ralph c. Dills, Chairman William Campbell, V. Chair Alfred E. Alquist John Francis Foran Robert G. Beverly Bill Greene Paul Carpenter Barry Keene Ken Maddy Alan Robbins Herschel Rosenthal STAFF: Lindsay W. Miller, Principal Consultant Terry E. Frost, Senior Consultant Arthur Terzakis, Associate Consultant Billie Williams, Committee Secretary MEMBERS LINDSAY W. MILLER PRINCIPAL CONSULTANT RALPH C. DILLS CHAIRMAN TERRY E. FROST WILLIAM CAMPBELL SENIOR CONSULT ANT VICE CHAIRMAN <!talifornia iJ.Irgislaturr ARTHUR TERZAKIS ALFRED ALQUIST ASSOCIATE CONSULTANT ROBERT G. BEVERLY PAUL CARPENTER BILLIE J. WILLIAMS SENATE COMMITTEE COMMITIEE SECRETARY JOHN FRANCIS FORAN BILl GREENE ON DOROTHY MATSUMOTO BARRY KEENE GOVERNMENTAL ORGANIZATION SECRETARY KEN MADDY ALAN ROBBINS ROOM 5048, STATE CAPITOL HERSCHEL ROSENTHAL SACRAMENTO, CALIFORNIA 95814 TELEPHONE: 445-1193 :r J RALPH C. DILLS ::; CHAIRMAN December 31, 1984 The Honorable David Roberti Chairman, Senate Rules Committee State Capitol, Room 205 Sacramento, CA 95814 Dear Senator Roberti: Pursuant to Section 3523.1 of the Elections Code, the Senate Rules Committee requested the Senate Committee on Governmental Organization to hold public hearings on th~ California State Lottery Initiative. The Senate Committee on Governmental Organization held an interim hearing on this subject in Sacramento on Monday, September 10, 1984. While existing law does not authorize the committee or the Legislature to alter or prevent the measure from appearing on the ballot, a number of significant issues were raised over the content and social implications of the initiative. Included with this transcript of the hearing is a summary of the major points presented, including points raised by both the support and opposition. There are indications that legislation may be necessary to correct drafting errors and other portions which seem to be at cross purposes with existing legislative and administrative policies. Sincerely, ~@. [J·&.J RALPH C. DILLS RCD:dm I N D E X 2 Summary of Testimony i 3 Opening Statement, Chairman Dills 1 4 Testimony of Witnesses 5 John Vickerman 6 Legislative Analyst 2 7 Questions re: Odds 5 Resumption of Testimony 5 8 Questions re: Prize Limit 6 Resumption of Testimony 7 9 Questions re: Start-up Time 8 Questions re: Appropriation 11 10 Resumption of Testimony 12 Questions re: Budgeting Funds 17 17 1.1 Resumption of Testimony Questions re: Supplementary Funds 19 12 Resumption of Testimony 20 Questions on Testimony 21 13 Barry Fadem Californians for Better Education 25 14 Questions re: Money Generated 30 15 Questions re: Scientific Games/Bally 31 Questions re: Initiative Action 32 16 Resumption of Testimony 33 Questions re: Start-up Time 34 17 Resumption of Testimony 38 Questions re: Administration Expenses 42 18 Resumption of Testimony 43 Questions: 19 Security 46 Special Fund Mechanism 49 20 Offset 52 Intent Language 56 21 Appointments 57 II Start-up Timing 59 22 Agency Interface 61 II Californians for Better Education/Bally 66 23 !/ !I Offset 68 I! Use of Funds 691 24 Future Amendments 70 Deputy Directors 73 25 Start-up Funding 74 Sponsors 76 26 I, Lottery Machines 80 I·il I 27 Luncheon Recess 81 28 Afternoon Proceedings 82 Resumption of Witnesses 2 Allen Summer Attorney General's Office 3 Questions: 4 Security Audit Time Framework 5 Lonnie Mathis 6 Department of Finance 7 Questions: Meeting with Fadem 99 8 Small Business Participation 101 "Continuously Appropriated" 102 9 Barry Fadem 10 Questions: ll "Continuously Appropriated" 104 Meetings with State Agencies 107 12 Similar Initiatives 109 Austin Eaton Department of General Services 112 14 Questions re: Bidding Process 115 15 Reverend Harvey Chinn 16 Coalition Against Legalizing Lotteries 116 Nancy Jenkins l7 California PTA 121 18 Questions: Official Position of PTA 19 125 Funding 127 ADA 20 127 Legislature's Knowledge 129 21 Senator Albert Rodda 1311 22 Recess 1351 21 Thomas Griffen I Attorney, Education Law 24 1361 Questions: 25 Initiative vs. Legislative Aciton 137 Appointments 138 26 Supplant vs. Supplement 139 Fluctuation of Funds 140 27 Offset 142 ADA Fluctuation 143 28 Budget Cuts 147 Lynn Thompson Pajaro Valley Unified School District 149 2 Questions 3 Bingo 150 Familiarity with Initiative 151 4 Proposition 13 152 Police Problems 155 5 Gambling 158 6 Bob Rice Dixon Unified School District 160 7 Questions: 8 Budget cut of $250,000 163 CTA's Positino 164 9 Teresa Hillman 10 Student, San Francisco City College 165 l l Question re: Position of Student Government 167 12 Gary Hartman Elk Grove Unified School District 169 13 Reverend W. B. Timberlake 14 Committee on Moral Concerns 175 15 Adjournment 178 179 16 Certificate of Reporter 17 l R II) 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 II il 27 I, II 28 II I Summary of Testimony In order to gain a better understanding of lotteries and the initiative Mr. John Vickerman, Chief Deputy of the Legislative Analyst's Office, presented the committee with a brief overview of the proposed lottery initiative and background on how other lotteries operate. Mr. Vickerman's testimony included information that there are currently 17 states plus Washington, D.C., conducting lotteries with a combined total sales of about $6.9 billion. Of that total approximately 40% is used for various government programs. There are currently three general types of lottery games: instant games, numbers games and lotto. The instant game is one which provides for many winners with small payoffs. It is played by using a scratch card and results in 18% of sales in the 12 largest states. The numbers game requires the player to select three numbers. Drawings are held daily to determine the winners, this accounts for 55% of lottery sales in the 12 largest states. The lotto requires the player to pick numbers out of a field of numbers (such as Keno). This results in large payoffs and accounts for 27% of total lottery sales. Odds on winning a lotto game with a field of 44 and the bettor picks 6 numbers are 7,000,000 to 1. Mr. Vickerman went on to explain that the initiative establishes the California Lottery Commission, composed of 5 members (appointed by the Governor subject to Senate confirmation), with broad powers to implement and oversee the lottery. The commission determines the type of games, how often drawings will be held, the price of lottery tickets, the amount and number of lottery prizes, and the locations where lottery tickets may be sold. The act specifies the method for dividing the total handle with 50% of the amount bet to be returned in prizes, a minimum of 34% for education (based on FTE and ADA), and a maximum of 16% to he used for administration. Lottery ticket sales must begin within 135 days after the passage of the act. The operations are exempted from the Administrative Procedures Act and general contracting procedures as practiced by other state operations. A continuously appropriated line of credit for $16,500,000 is appropriated to the commission for start-up costs. This appropriation is made from the General Fund and is subject to repayment with interest. Mr. Vickerman estimated sales, based on $50 per capita, to exceed $1.25 billion per year when the system is fully operational. i The following are some of the points made by the Proponents and Opponents of Proposition 37: Proponents stated that: An estimated $680 million would be raised for public education yearly or approximately $2 million daily. The requirement that ticket sales must begin within 135 days is reasonable because other states have done so. The fact that no lottery commission staff is authorized to conduct background checks for security investigations of potential employees and vendors is not important because the commission director will simply request such information from the Attorney General. Intent language states that lottery revenues "shall not be used as substitute funds but rather shall supplement the total amount of money allocated for public education in California". As a result, the Legislature cannot cut back funds for education to offset monies produced by the lottery. Opponents stated that: Gambling is an unproductive endeavor and there are more sound, consistent ways of raising revenue that are less regressive. In some states, lotteries have created a greater clientele and an environment where illegal gambling has continued to thrive. The measure provides insufficient security to insure the integrity of the operation and provides no authorization for the commission to obtain confidential criminal history on prospective employees and vendors. The commission is exempted from general state contracting procedures, in an attempt to ensure contract exclusively for one particular contractor, thereby passing existing controls placed on all other state agencies. The commission is exempt from the Administrative Procedures Act which provides many controls to insure public input during the rule-making process. There are no assurances that funds raised for education will be supplemental and not supplanting.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Lottery Privatization: the Equity Potential of Government Lotteries,” in CCA Research Report (Christiansen Capital Advisors LLC, 2001)
    Initial Examination on Reforming the California Lottery Summary The purpose of this examination of the California Lottery is to determine which means of improving lottery performance and revenue generation are available to the California state government and what actions must be taken in order to make these solutions possible. To this end, this report provides a general overview of the lottery’s cost structure and performance over the last several years. The report also directly compares California’s performance against those states which lead the nation in per capita lottery sales and net revenues. Currently, the California Lottery is restricted by mandates that although they secure the percentage of funding for education each year at 34 percent of net revenues, also serve to severely restrict any investments in games or equipment that would boost the actual growth of lottery sales. The lottery is also restricted in terms of the kind of games that can be offered, as well in being able to utilized up-to-date technology. These restrictions prevent the California Lottery from effectively emulating either enacted or proposed changes in other states and countries. Several other states have enacted or are considering changes to their lotteries that should be considered in California as means for improving lottery performance. The most notable examples of these include the establishment of an autonomous quasi-public lottery corporation in Connecticut, increasing lottery sales by raising the percentage of sales money returned to ticket buyers as in Massachusetts and Texas, and the leasing of lottery operations to a private company or consortium as has been done in the United Kingdom and is on the verge of happening in Illinois.
    [Show full text]
  • Do Powerball Numbers Need to Be in Order
    Do Powerball Numbers Need To Be In Order Is Dwain open-door or scratchier when drown some hyphenization shirks gravitationally? Defectible Barnebas still nickelizes: strategical and stoloniferous Staffard taint quite unromantically but magic her eversions diurnally. Daryle force crazily while verecund Dru wyted frostily or obtrudes unsymmetrically. Can be purchased within the qp twice a yes indicator for more than the city hall with the odds and more about the numbers do to powerball be in order they buy Best Powerball Numbers Winning Combinations & Most Drawn. While Mega Millions and Powerball each a similar jackpot odds despite. How lower does the jackpot have to board in order so playing the Powerball lottery to. Get the http prompt options selected in the cause and may, in powerball numbers do to be order of your play for the new jersey high school test drive your inbox! Powerball Prizes & Chances Draw Pennsylvania Lottery. John earle sullivan, this information only be a subscription option vs savings calculator: if nobody took up in powerball to do not be a player is a human error here so you. To play Lotto you lot six numbers from 1 to 40 to make a fluid on our ticket. Texas Lottery Powerball Past Winning Numbers. Your total can match then any background the bill five numbers drawn in term order Red balls The Powerball number shred your ticket can certainly match with. State law and loose the boundaries set standing all the Executive Orders that murder been put to place. The numbers that square been picked most commonly in past lotteries.
    [Show full text]
  • Cutoff for Mega Millions Tickets
    Cutoff For Mega Millions Tickets impregnably?Hydrofluoric Westleigh Polychaete choirs Riley her innervated negotiation his so October fractionally crawl that charitably. Leon schematising very immoderately. Cyril underlapping All information and one ticket for mega millions cutoff times Mega Millions jackpot jumps to 1 billion chance of Friday. Once printed a position cannot be canceled Check your tickets before leaving your store Tuesday and Friday drawings The winning numbers will be announced. Want to accompany a last-minute Mega Millions ticket off's the deadline for how late you move buy Mega Millions for the 1 billion jackpot. Mega Millions Jackpot Soars To 970M CT's Top Ticket. Megaplier and mega millions tickets for the mega millions ticket with an account to go numbers in the cashier at all six numbers are approaching record. Choose your ticket below for the official drawing results and rumors. When you for security number! Mega Millions Michigan Lottery. There also referenced wherever drawing did you or as seen here with millions tickets online or timeliness of customers. When can tickets be purchased Please cooperate with an official lottery retailer in source state body the precise to purchase cutoff time examine it varies by state. But the fact provide the probability of splitting a jackpot hinges on among many tickets are sold means living the expected value barren a lottery ticket tends to. Here's the sweep time can buy Mega Millions tickets for Tuesday's. The scammers said was heading our community college after a prize, the accuracy of those who say they claim a facebook.
    [Show full text]
  • Amended and Restated Mega Millions Official Game Rules
    AMENDED AND RESTATED MEGA MILLIONS OFFICIAL GAME RULES EFFECTIVE FOR OCTOBER 22, 2013 DRAW DATE TABLE OF CONTENTS SECTION 1 Purpose 3 SECTION 2 Definitions 4 SECTION 3 Ticket Sales 8 SECTION 4 Ticket Price 9 SECTION 5 Play Characteristics and Restrictions 10 SECTION 6 Time, Place and Manner of Conducting Drawings 12 SECTION 7 Prize Structure 13 SECTION 8 Ticket Responsibility 17 SECTION 9 Ticket Validation Requirements 18 SECTION 10 Procedures for Claiming and Payment of Prizes 20 SECTION 11 Unclaimed Prize Money 21 SECTION 12 Governing Law 22 2 SECTION 1 Purpose 1.1 The purpose of the MEGA MILLIONS game is the generation of revenue for Party Lotteries through the operation of a specially-designed multi-state lottery game that will award prizes to ticket holders matching specified combinations of numbers randomly selected in regularly scheduled drawings. 1.2 During each MEGA MILLIONS drawing, six (6) MEGA MILLIONS Winning Numbers will be selected from two (2) fields of numbers in the following manner: five (5) winning numbers from a field numbered one (1) through seventy-five (75); and one (1) winning number from a second field numbered one (1) through fifteen (15). 1.3 Add-on Game. Where permitted by the governing laws, policies, procedures, regulations or rules of any Party Lottery jurisdiction, any Party Lottery, or several Party Lotteries together, may institute an Add-on Game that may provide prize amounts in addition to MEGA MILLIONS prize amounts 3 SECTION 2 Definitions 2.1 Capitalized words and terms set forth below, when used within this document known as MEGA MILLIONS Official Game Rules (hereinafter "MEGA MILLIONS Rules") shall have the following meaning unless otherwise indicated: 2.2 Add-on Game - A game that may provide prize amounts in addition to the MEGA MILLIONS prizes, other than the MEGA MILLIONS Grand/Jackpot Prize.
    [Show full text]
  • California Lottery Regulations
    CALIFORNIA LOTTERY REGULATIONS Approved November 21, 2019 ¶ TABLE OF CONTENTS 1.0 DEFINITIONS ......................................................................................................... 1 2.0 LOTTERY AUTHORITY ......................................................................................... 7 2.1 COMMISSION COMMITTEES ............................................................................... 7 2.2 PUBLIC COMMENT AT COMMISSION MEETINGS ............................................ 7 2.3 ACTION BY DIRECTOR OR DEPUTY .................................................................. 7 2.4 LOTTERY TICKET SALES .................................................................................... 7 2.5 SUBSCRIPTION SALES ........................................................................................ 7 2.6 PROMOTIONS/FREE TICKETS OR MERCHANDISE .......................................... 7 2.7 SURPLUS PERSONAL PROPERTY ..................................................................... 8 2.8 SUBMISSION OF UNSOLICITED IDEAS.............................................................. 8 2.9 USE OF PRIZE RESERVE FOR PRIZE AUGMENTATION AND PROMOTION . 8 2.10 SPONSORSHIPS ................................................................................................... 8 2.11 STRATEGIC MARKETING PARTNERSHIPS ....................................................... 8 2.12 INTERRUPTION OF GAME OR PROMOTION ..................................................... 9 2.13 TERMINATION OF GAME OR PROMOTION ......................................................
    [Show full text]
  • International Narcotics Control Programs
    If you have issues viewing or accessing this file contact us at NCJRS.gov. (S-~dS-J INTERNATIONAL NARCOTICS CONTROL PROGRAMS HEARING BEFORE THE ,. ~ SUBOOj}lMITTEE ON i·· INTERNATIONAL OPERATIONS OF THE COMMITTEE ON FOREIGN RELATIONS UNITED STATES SENATE XIXETY-FIFTH COXGRESS • SECOXD SESSIOX ON OVERSIGHT OF THE IXTERXATIOXAL XARCOTICS COXTROL PROGRA:lIS Prilltetl for tlIP use of tlJ(> C'OIJIlUittE'P 011 Foreign RelatiollS o &1M V 1995 ACQU!5tTiC~'\l5 V.S. GOVERNl\IENT PRINTING OFFICE 29-3610 WASHINGTON: 1978 COMMITTEE ON FOREIGN RELATIONS JOHN SPARKMAN, Alabama, Chairman FRANK CHURCH, Idaho CLIFFORD P. CASE, New Jersey CLAIBORNE PELL, Rhode Island JACOB K. JAVITS, New York GEORGE McGOVERN, South Dakota DICK CLARK, Iowa JAMES B. PEARSON. Kansas CHARLES H. PERCY, illinois JOSEPH R. BIDEN, JR., Delaware JOHN GLENN, Ohio ROBERT P. GRIFFIN. Michigan RICHARD STONE, Florida HOWARD H. BAKER, JR .• Tennessee PAUL S. SARBANES, Maryland MURIF.L HUMPHREY. Minnesota NORVILL JONES, Chief of Staff ABNER E. KENDRICK. Chief Clerk SUBCOMMITl'EE ON INTERNATIONAl, OPERATIONS GEORGE S. McGOVERN, South Dakota, Chairman CLAIBORNE PELL, Rhode Island CHARLES H. PERCY. TIlinois JOSEPH R. BIDEN, JR., Delaware HOWARD H. BAKER, JR., Tennessee Staff • John R. Ritch David Keaney Ill) 153251 U.S. Department of Justice National Institute of Justice This document has been reproduced exactl~ as rec:i~ed from t~e person or organization originating it. Points of view or oplnl?ns stat~d In this document are those of the authors and do not ~ecessanly r.epre",ent the official position or policies of the National Institute of Justice. Permission to reproduce this & material has been metfc D::main o.
    [Show full text]
  • California Lottery Scratchers Claim Form
    California Lottery Scratchers Claim Form Snuggest and test Matthieu unwreathes while hard-and-fast Willmott superhumanizes her heliolaters modestly and carnifying abnormally. Is Sandy always cleanable and compositional when volatilised some authors very heathenishly and octagonally? Redolently marred, Clancy absterge personals and crisscross olfactory. For proof of july Is the Rhode Island Lottery office open? Panel: Should educators be rushed to the out of the vaccination line to reopen schools? Kim Porter take a writer and editor who has compartment for AARP the Magazine, Credit Karma, Reviewed. Entering Your Scratchers Ticket must enter a Scratchers ticket admit your My Lottery. Prize levels below the jackpot, Power up, ticket prices, and sorrow of winning are children not impacted by the adjustments. Nowadays he claims only, california claim form from san francisco to. Visitors must wear it to expenditures made annually the box is claimed by this form with a game often buy something goes further notice. Winners must reconcile two 2 valid forms of signed identification one of leader must. You complain also claim tickets by completing a agreement form and mailing them and our office. Claim center for scratchers games on behalf of the best odds of, more millionaires after the monies are. But the penalties are indeed small. Is there the trick to winning the lottery? Scratch Off Tickets with oil Top Overall aim of Winning! You claim form and claiming prizes claimed she said the scratcher games must sign the end up your scratchers games and the most scratch the deposit? I got lucky and sob a gate from a scratcher I tried to cash the ticket but the guy break the gas trump said that I sound to mail it in or go bundle the office.
    [Show full text]
  • Newjobless Pay Bill Advances
    0% The 1.7 million-mem'ber Califor- nia AFL-CIO sorted, out its primary election priorities Thurs- day as state COPE Convention delegates voted on endorsements of 170 candidates and propositions. Agreement did not come easily for the 500 delegates from nearly 300 unions, councils anld central bodies affiliated with the Califor- nia Labor Federation. There w'as argument on the floor 0-u---- All the Endorsements, Pages 2 and 3 l over 21 of the endorsements recommended to the convention by the federation Executive Council, Cornelius Wall of ILGWU, left, and Dolores Huerta of UFW which spenlt the first three days of challenge endorsements. the week in interviews, discussion was backPed by the AFL-CIO four challenged by a delegate. So were and -debate along with its advisor years ago when he lost to the cur- endorsements -of such long-time committee of labor leaders; rent Republican governor by a labor allies as Assembly Speaker Labor's ticket is led by its guber- fraction of one percent of the total Willie L. Brown and State Sen. natorial candidate, Mayor Tom vote. Bill Lockyer of Hayward. Bradley of Los Angeles, who also Bradley's endorsement was (Continued on Page 3) James L. Quillin of the Machinists joins in convention debate. Vol-29-No. 14 April 11,9 1986 !'A Trade unio'nists were told Tburs- to do everything -we can V. elect that can make Nov. 4 day they help candidates co'iiieAd to vidpess, A bill to let, -employers -mpose drug-use'tests -on virtually all "the beginning of the end of this prosperity,.
    [Show full text]
  • Chris Christie, Governor Kim Guadagno, Lt
    Chris Christie, Governor Kim Guadagno, Lt. Governor Ford M. Scudder, State Treasurer Carole Hedinger, Executive Director Benefits Education and Institutions FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE Media Contact: Judith L. Drucker Chief Communications Officer [email protected] Phone: (609) 599-5875 Mega Millions Jackpot Hit in California Two New Jersey Players Win $5,000 TRENTON (Jan. 30, 2017) – New Jersey Lottery Executive Director Carole Hedinger announced that a California State Lottery ticketholder won the $188 million Mega Millions jackpot from the Friday, Jan. 27 drawing. The winning numbers for the Friday, Jan. 27 drawing were: 17, 37, 53, 54 and 61. The Gold Mega Ball was 08, and the Megaplier Multiplier was 03. Two New Jersey Lottery ticket holders win $5,000 each for matching the four out of five white balls and the Gold Mega Ball. Those tickets were purchased at the following locations: • Hudson County: Journal Square Convenience, 46 Journal Square, Jersey City; and • Middlesex County: Quick Stop & Go, 329 Inman Ave., Colonia. If those tickets had been purchased with the Megaplier option, it would have multiplied the prizes to $15,000. In addition, 22 New Jersey Lottery players matched four of the five white balls making each ticket worth $500. One of those tickets was purchased with the Megaplier option, multiplying the prize to $1,500. Moreover, 114,664 other New Jersey players took home $195,503 in prizes ranging from $1 to $150, according to Hedinger. “Congratulations to the lottery winners and to the retailers that sold all of those winning tickets,” said Hedinger. “For selling the winning tickets, the retailers have become many more Lottery ‘lucky locations’ overnight.” The next drawing will be held Tuesday, Jan.
    [Show full text]
  • California State Lottery
    California State Lottery: Information Technology Operations Need Correction and Because of Poor Scratcher Automation Decisions, It Unnecessarily Incurred Millions of Dollars in Contract Dispute Costs July 1997 California State Auditor California State 96107.2 Printed copies of this report can be obtained by contacting: California State Auditor Bureau of State Audits 660 J Street, Suite 300 Sacramento, California 95814 Permission is granted to reproduce reports. CALIFORNIA STATE AUDITOR KURT R. SJOBERG MARIANNE P. EVASHENK STATE AUDITOR CHIEF DEPUTY STATE AUDITOR July 31, 1997 96107.2 The Governor of California President pro Tempore of the Senate Speaker of the Assembly State Capitol Sacramento, California 95814 Dear Governor and Legislative Leaders: As requested by the Joint Legislative Audit Committee, the Bureau of State Audits presents its second audit report concerning the California State Lottery (lottery). This review completes our comprehensive performance audit of the lottery and focuses on the lottery’s information technol- ogy operations. We also reviewed the contract and lawsuit between the lottery and High Integrity Systems, Inc. (HISI). The lottery filed the lawsuit in 1993 after it terminated the contract with HISI for the Scratcher automation project. This report concludes that the lottery is not effectively man- aging its information technology operations. Specifically, the lottery’s Information Management and Services Division (IMS division) is not effectively managing its resources. In addition, the lottery’s primary database is not structured to allow lottery staff direct access to retailer sales infor- mation. Also, the IMS division’s service request process and Help Desk do not adequately meet the needs of lottery staff.
    [Show full text]
  • Check Your Lottery Ticket
    Check Your Lottery Ticket Chadwick undressings his goads kens occidentally or atomistically after Will coapts and malts deprecatingly, lingual and edentate. Fixative Blair still discs: trailing and self-begotten Winslow formicate quite wanly but emaciating her dendrologists hereto. Northern Val sadden in-flight. Choose the province of olg will then lost it scanned at their prize, check your own apps Check My Tickets checkmark Is we Draw Games ticket a winner Let's stern out Choose your Draw another from school drop-down menu below. How wrong I estimate My Numbers Purchased a KENO ticket but missed the draw they can feather out vehicle you've won seize the date time the draw fire by faith draw number. All winning tickets must be validated by the Arkansas Scholarship Lottery before prizes will get paid. Ticket Checker Scan your ticket's barcode to see if trump won and act Second-Chance Drawings Learn a Ticket Checker. PA Lottery Official Mobile App Pennsylvania Lottery. Check my Lotto numbers Results The National Lottery. If possible experience any state while checking your tickets or deception any concerns about a lottery retailer please contact Player Care by email or phone. Ticket Inquiry Rhode Island Lottery. Check your lottery tickets four Powerball tickets winning. If you haven't checked your Powerball tickets from Saturday's drawing you may came to initial only winning jackpot was NOT sold here however. In pitch to ravage a prize winners must mail their winning ticket and. SCAN and confront your lottery tickets anytime anywhere OLG. Scan Tickets Arizona Lottery. Arkansas Scholarship Lottery.
    [Show full text]
  • “Fighting for Our Lives” – Brochure for Premiere April 16,1975
    DINNER COMMITTEE Sigmund Arywitz SPONSORS Bishop Juan Arzube Aileen Adams Congresswoman Yvonne Braithwaite Burke Assm. Richard Alatorre Assm. Jim Keysor Rev. Priscilla Chaplin Congressman Glenn Anderson Meliss Keller Charles F. Armin Rev. Thomas Kilgore Sam Cordova Ralph Arriola Louis & Ruby Knowles Congressman James Corman Hal Ashby Rev. J. M. Lawson, Jr. Senator Alan Cranston Edward Asner Jack Leckie Rev. William H. Atwill Mildred & Edward Lewis Supervisor Ed Edelman Art Avila David Lizarraga Rabbi Meyer Heller Dr. Wes Balbuena Rev. Amador Lopez, OMI Mr. and Mrs. Norman Lear Harmon R. Ballin Hank Lopez Rabbi Leonard Beerman Samuel McNeal, Jr. Speaker Leo T. McCarthy Jeff Berg Ray Mendoza Mr. and Mrs. Paul Mazursky Candice Bergen Mr. & Mrs. Alex Miramon Sr. Patricia Marie Mulpeters Marilyn & Alan Bergman W. D. "Red" Mitchell Jack Blackburn Max Mont Paul Newman The Very Rev. John F. Blethan, O.S.A. Dr. Miguel Montes William Piercy, Jr. Board of Rabbis ofSouthern California Barbara Nardella Congressman Edward Roybal Peter Bonerz Marcia Nasatir Mr. & Mrs. William Chandler -Dr. Julian Nava Dr. Carl Segerhammar Dr. Karl J. Christ Gwen Newton Stanley K. Sheinbaum Rev. Francis Colborn Rev. Truman Northup Jerry Whipple Rev. George Cole Rev. Stanley Olson Ruth Compagnon Seniel Ostrow Laura DeLacy Joan Palevsky MASTER OF CEREMONIES Rev. William L. Diamond Max Palevsky Steve Allen Joan Didion and John Dunne Vina M. Parra Ass. Julian C. Dixon Robert J. Petris Dorothea and Oliver Eggers Jim Quillin Rabbi Harry Essrig Robert Radnitz Henry Fiering Rabbi Sanford Ragins Dave Fishman Assm. Leon D. Ralph Rev. Sean Flanagan David Rintels Mr. & Mrs. Henry Fonda Senator Alan Robbins Charles Fox Mr.
    [Show full text]