“Rojava - the Utopia of a Defeated Western Left” the Hidden Truths of the Kurdish “Democratic Experiment” in North Eastern Syria

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

“Rojava - the Utopia of a Defeated Western Left” the Hidden Truths of the Kurdish “Democratic Experiment” in North Eastern Syria iNSIGHTS | VOL 2 | ISSUE NO. 1 | JANUARY 2020 “ROJAVA - THE UTOPIA OF A DEFEATED WESTERN LEFT” THE HIDDEN TRUTHS OF THE KURDISH “DEMOCRATIC EXPERIMENT” IN NORTH EASTERN SYRIA DR ALAIN GABON VOL 2 | ISSUE NO. 1 | JANUARY 202001 “ROJAVA – THE UTOPIA OF A DEFEATED WESTERN LEFT” SERIES EDITORS: iNSIGHTS | VOL 2 | ISSUE NO. 1 | JANUARY 2020 Dr Anas Altikriti “ROJAVA - Chief Executive Dr Abdullah Faliq THE UTOPIA Editor & Managing Director H. D. Foreman OF A DEFEATED Louise Mellor Sandra Tusin WESTERN LEFT” DESIGN & ART DIRECTION: Abdullah S. Khan THE HIDDEN TRUTHS OF THE KURDISH “DEMOCRATIC EXPERIMENT” IN NORTH EASTERN SYRIA COPYRIGHT DR ALAIN GABON © The Cordoba Foundation 2020. All rights reserved. DISCLAIMER Views and opinions expressed in this publication do not necessarily reflect those of The Cordoba Foundation. [email protected] VOL 2 | ISSUE NO. 1 | JANUARY 2020 01 Published in London VOL 2 | ISSUE NO. 1 | JANUARY 2020 Available online: www.thecordobafoundation.com THE CORDOBA FOUNDATION The Cordoba Foundation (TCF) is an independent strategic think-tank that works to promote intercultural dialogue and positive coexistence through a range of activities including research and publications, training and capacity building, policy briefings and dialogues. The Foundation takes its name from the city of Cordoba – the European metropolis which was once a symbol of human excellence and intellectual ingenuity, where cultures, civilisations and ideas thrived. Embodying this spirit, TCF today facilitates the meeting of minds to advance understanding and respect for one another. Our activities include: • Structured consultation and advisory services • Face-to-face interaction with decision-makers and figures of authority • In-house research • Workshops, seminars and debates on pertinent issues • Consultancy • Training and capacity-building • Publications, Periodicals and Journals • Resourceful website and knowledge database www.thecordobafoundation.com 02 iNSIGHTS | VOL 2 | ISSUE NO. 1 | JANUARY 2020 TABLE OF CONTENTS 04 RECENT DEVELOPMENTS IN SYRIA 06 FINALLY AN EXIT STRATEGY? 07 WINNERS AND LOSERS 09 ROJAVA FOREVER! 11 “ROJAVA”: THE LATEST UTOPIA OF A DEFEATED WESTERN LEFT 14 DEBUNKING THE ROJAVA MYTH 15 HIDDEN REALITIES OF “ROJAVA” 18 MISREADING THE IDEOLOGICAL ROOTS AND NATURE OF ROJAVA 23 FROM THE START, A DOOMED ENTERPRISE 24 CONCLUSION: WHAT NEXT FOR THE KURDS? 26 AUTHOR PROFILE 27 ENDNOTES 03 “ROJAVA – THE UTOPIA OF A DEFEATED WESTERN LEFT” “ROJAVA - THE UTOPIA OF A DEFEATED WESTERN LEFT” THE HIDDEN TRUTHS OF THE KURDISH “DEMOCRATIC EXPERIMENT” IN NORTH EASTERN SYRIA DR ALAIN GABON or several years, Western media, RECENT DEVELOPMENTS IN SYRIA politicians, and many public In October 2018, President Donald intellectuals and academics have Trump announced he was finally pulling the Fpraised, even glorified the Kurdish “experiment one thousand American ground troops out of in direct democracy” taking place in the northern Syria as part of his larger campaign northeastern Syrian region of Rojava as a promise to withdraw from the Middle East and model for the democratisation of that region. end American participation in those “useless This paper seeks to first offer an overview wars,” as he has kept repeating in his serial of the recent developments in the Syrian tweeting since his election. situation with an assessment of the new Yet it soon became obvious that rather situation as of today, including the winners than a departure from the Middle East, this and losers of those recent changes. Following already limited withdrawal was more of that background, we will explain the various a relocation of American troops to other reasons for that rather sudden interest, on strategic parts of the region like Iraq. Trump the part of Western groups as different as had barely finished announcing that the US our military-political establishments and the would leave Syria and he was already changing radical Left(s), for the Syrian Kurds in general course and sending or redeploying troops and the short-lived Rojava “laboratory” to protect the oil fields, in a swift and highly in particular. We will refute the myth and confusing, even chaotic series of completely dominant discourse on Rojava as a utopian contradictory declarations and maneuvers. and novel “democracy-in-the-heart-of-a-non- These confusions, reversals and contradictory democratic-region” and show that the realities statements reflect the grave tensions and of that experiment in ethnic, social, and antagonistic policy orientations within the political engineering are extremely different U.S. administration, and more particularly and much more problematic than what we between the U.S. military-industrial- have heard about it for years. To conclude, intelligence complex (whose top command we will draw some lessons from the failure of seemed violently and vocally opposed to the “Rojava” regarding the future of the Kurds. withdrawal) and its Commander-in-Chief, 04 iNSIGHTS | VOL 2 | ISSUE NO. 1 | JANUARY 2020 and the rift between Trump and the U.S. sham, a fiction, a myth designed to prove to Congress, where the opposition to the military Trump’s gullible electorate that he is indeed withdrawal was fierce by both Democrats and fulfilling his campaign promises while he is Republicans. not, and is often doing the opposite, though It is at this point quite obvious he must be given credit for not having started that nothing Trump says can be taken at another war of choice. In that respect, no face value, and his oft-repeated promises commentators to our knowledge have argued (mostly addressed to his isolationist, non- that Trump’s policy, at-least regarding military interventionist core electoral base) to withdraw interventionism in the MENA, is actually very from the Middle East, cease American much continuous with Obama, including the participation in those regional wars, “bring the latter’s concept of “leading from behind” — a boys back home” and refrain from intervening euphemism for “disengagement”. Though in foreign conflicts are no exception. The gap this would need to be verified, it seems that between Trump’s declarations and the realities Trump’s appetite for policies like drone of the continuing, sometimes increased U.S. killing is even lower than that of Obama, who engagement, including military engagement in in that respect outplayed Bush himself by that part of the world, is often dramatic. “surging” those drone wars and secret military As Trita Parsi and Stephen Wertheim interventions to a whole new level. While also compellingly demonstrate in the Foreign participating in the 2011 NATO bombing Policy Magazine, campaign of Libya, which led to the collapse of “The only constant is that Trump claims that state and the extra-judicial assassination of to want to end ‘endless wars’ while doing Colonel Gaddafi, with the consequence that nothing of the sort... Trump’s anti-war the whole country has been plunged into a rhetoric gives cover to his war-making long and agonising bloody chaos that is bound administration… Trump may lambast to last many more years, in the most optimistic endless war in tweets, but he has increased scenario. U.S. troop levels by 30 percent since At-least Trump has so far done nothing May, in addition to nearly of that sort, despite the constant accusations “The “Syria pullout” doubling U.S. forces in of “recklessness,” and he deserves to be Afghanistan since taking congratulated for such restraint, though any is largely a sham, office. The first two years compliment addressed to him is apparently a fiction, a myth of his presidency saw 28 out of the question for our intelligentsia, designed to prove percent more drone including our media and foreign policy strikes in Yemen, Somalia, establishment. to Trump’s gullible and Pakistan compared with On the other hand, as a result of a pretty electorate that he is his predecessor’s first two intensive round of diplomatic negotiations years.” between the U.S. and Turkey, American troops indeed fulfilling his did withdraw from northeastern Syrian areas in campaign promises As is becoming clearer order to avoid standing in the way of Turkey’s now, even in Syria, the U.S. offensive. Given that President Recep Erdogan while he is not, and may actually end up having received the green light from Trump for his is often doing the more troops there today military operation in those Kurdish-held than ever before! On the areas, the White House had to clear the way opposite.” one hand, therefore, the for Turkish troops in order to avoid the risk “Syria pullout” is largely a of a clash between the two countries’ military 05 “ROJAVA – THE UTOPIA OF A DEFEATED WESTERN LEFT” forces. Despite ongoing analysts seem to think. tensions between the two “The deluge of quasi- Despite being utterly men, the October agreement dependent militarily on Russia, (see full text here) seems unanimous Western without which he would never to have been sealed further outrage at both have been able to make his during Erdogan’s November, Trump’s “betrayal of amazing come-back from the 14th visit to Washington situation he was in in 2015 after D.C., a month after the start the Kurdish allies” years of anti-regime uprisings of “Operation Peace Spring,” and at Erdogan’s when few were betting on his which incidentally, is by no survival, Assad has proven means the first, but the third offensive, and the several times that he can resist operation already in northern slew of outlandish Putin and keep a high degree Syria. So there is also a strong of autonomy towards Russia policy continuity here on the accusations against (see for example his visit to part of Turkey. him largely masked his front-line troops in Idlib Despite its volatility, this the same day as the Sotchi entente cordiale between Trump how remarkable, summit), the main reason being and Erdogan (because that and largely that Russia needs Assad as well, is what we really mean when successful the U.S.- including for reasons not often we talk about “the U.S.
Recommended publications
  • Andy Kim Touted Himself As President Obama's “Point Man”
    HIT: Andy Kim touted himself as President Obama’s “point man” on Iraq issues at the White House. While working for the Obama administration, he attended meetings with terrorists including one of the leaders responsible for an attack at the US Embassy in Baghdad, and a senior member of the Muslim Brotherhood. BACKUP: Kim joined the State Department in 2009 as an Iraq expert: • Kim joined the State Department in 2009 as an Iraq expert. “Kim joined the Obama administration in September 2009 as an Iraq expert at the State Department. In 2011, he spent five months in Kabul in a civilian role advising two commanders of U.S. forces in Afghanistan, first Gen. David H. Petraeus and then Gen. John Allen.” (Salvador Rizzo, “Obama adviser running for Congress claims he also worked for Bush,” Washington Post, 9/10/18) Kim was the Iraq Director on Obama’s National Security Council from 2013 until leaving the administration in August 2015: • Kim was the Iraq Director on Obama’s National Security Council from 2013 until leaving the administration in August 2015. “Kim was director for Iraq issues at the Pentagon for five months in 2013 and then was Iraq director on Obama’s National Security Council for two years until leaving the administration in August 2015.” (Salvador Rizzo, “Obama adviser running for Congress claims he also worked for Bush,” Washington Post, 9/10/18) Kim was Obama’s “point man” on Iraq issues while serving in the National Security Council, a credential he has boasted about on the campaign trail: • The Flat Hat: “Kim served at the White House between 2013 and 2015 as Director of Iraq, where he was responsible for managing the crisis response across the Administration and developing strategy.” (Emily Martell, “Andrew Kim Discusses ISIS, Future Of Conflict In Iraq,” The Flat Hat, 11/10/16) • Kim noted he was the Obama Administration’s point man in 2014 as ISIS was gaining ground in Iraq.
    [Show full text]
  • Iraq: Opposition to the Government in the Kurdistan Region of Iraq (KRI)
    Country Policy and Information Note Iraq: Opposition to the government in the Kurdistan Region of Iraq (KRI) Version 2.0 June 2021 Preface Purpose This note provides country of origin information (COI) and analysis of COI for use by Home Office decision makers handling particular types of protection and human rights claims (as set out in the Introduction section). It is not intended to be an exhaustive survey of a particular subject or theme. It is split into two main sections: (1) analysis and assessment of COI and other evidence; and (2) COI. These are explained in more detail below. Assessment This section analyses the evidence relevant to this note – i.e. the COI section; refugee/human rights laws and policies; and applicable caselaw – by describing this and its inter-relationships, and provides an assessment of, in general, whether one or more of the following applies: • A person is reasonably likely to face a real risk of persecution or serious harm • The general humanitarian situation is so severe as to breach Article 15(b) of European Council Directive 2004/83/EC (the Qualification Directive) / Article 3 of the European Convention on Human Rights as transposed in paragraph 339C and 339CA(iii) of the Immigration Rules • The security situation presents a real risk to a civilian’s life or person such that it would breach Article 15(c) of the Qualification Directive as transposed in paragraph 339C and 339CA(iv) of the Immigration Rules • A person is able to obtain protection from the state (or quasi state bodies) • A person is reasonably able to relocate within a country or territory • A claim is likely to justify granting asylum, humanitarian protection or other form of leave, and • If a claim is refused, it is likely or unlikely to be certifiable as ‘clearly unfounded’ under section 94 of the Nationality, Immigration and Asylum Act 2002.
    [Show full text]
  • 'Political Islam', and the Muslim Brotherhood Review
    House of Commons Foreign Affairs Committee ‘Political Islam’, and the Muslim Brotherhood Review Sixth Report of Session 2016–17 Report, together with formal minutes relating to the report Ordered by the House of Commons to be printed 1 November 2016 HC 118 Published on 7 November 2016 by authority of the House of Commons The Foreign Affairs Committee The Foreign Affairs Committee is appointed by the House of Commons to examine the expenditure, administration, and policy of the Foreign and Commonwealth Office and its associated public bodies. Current membership Crispin Blunt MP (Conservative, Reigate) (Chair) Mr John Baron MP (Conservative, Basildon and Billericay) Ann Clwyd MP (Labour, Cynon Valley) Mike Gapes MP (Labour (Co-op), Ilford South) Stephen Gethins MP (Scottish National Party, North East Fife) Mr Mark Hendrick MP (Labour (Co-op), Preston) Adam Holloway MP (Conservative, Gravesham) Daniel Kawczynski MP (Conservative, Shrewsbury and Atcham) Ian Murray MP (Labour, Edinburgh South) Andrew Rosindell MP (Conservative, Romford) Nadhim Zahawi MP (Conservative, Stratford-on-Avon) The following member was also a member of the Committee during this inquiry: Yasmin Qureshi MP (Labour, Bolton South East) Powers The Committee is one of the departmental select committees, the powers of which are set out in House of Commons Standing Orders, principally in SO No 152. These are available on the internet via www.parliament.uk. Publication Committee reports are published on the Committee’s website at www.parliament.uk/facom and in print by Order of the House. Evidence relating to this report is published on the inquiry page of the Committee’s website.
    [Show full text]
  • Iraq 2019 Human Rights Report
    IRAQ 2019 HUMAN RIGHTS REPORT EXECUTIVE SUMMARY Iraq is a constitutional parliamentary republic. The 2018 parliamentary elections, while imperfect, generally met international standards of free and fair elections and led to the peaceful transition of power from Prime Minister Haider al-Abadi to Adil Abd al-Mahdi. On December 1, in response to protesters’ demands for significant changes to the political system, Abd al-Mahdi submitted his resignation, which the Iraqi Council of Representatives (COR) accepted. As of December 17, Abd al-Mahdi continued to serve in a caretaker capacity while the COR worked to identify a replacement in accordance with the Iraqi constitution. Numerous domestic security forces operated throughout the country. The regular armed forces and domestic law enforcement bodies generally maintained order within the country, although some armed groups operated outside of government control. Iraqi Security Forces (ISF) consist of administratively organized forces within the Ministries of Interior and Defense, and the Counterterrorism Service. The Ministry of Interior is responsible for domestic law enforcement and maintenance of order; it oversees the Federal Police, Provincial Police, Facilities Protection Service, Civil Defense, and Department of Border Enforcement. Energy police, under the Ministry of Oil, are responsible for providing infrastructure protection. Conventional military forces under the Ministry of Defense are responsible for the defense of the country but also carry out counterterrorism and internal security operations in conjunction with the Ministry of Interior. The Counterterrorism Service reports directly to the prime minister and oversees the Counterterrorism Command, an organization that includes three brigades of special operations forces. The National Security Service (NSS) intelligence agency reports directly to the prime minister.
    [Show full text]
  • Israel's Response to Terrorism
    Effective solidarity among states has become a prerequisite for ultimately succeeding in the war of the West against jihadist terrorism. A cohesive military strategy is needed for the West, the Arab states that are threatened, and Israel. It stands to reason that, just as all three face similar threats, the JERUSALEM models developed in Israel for dealing with terror merit attention in Europe and beyond. BERLIN Amb. Dore Gold President, Jerusalem Center for Public Affairs ISRAEL’S RESPONSE TO TERRORISM FROM LESSONS LESSONS FROM ISRAEL’S RESPONSE TO TERRORISM FIAMMA NIRENSTEIN (ED.) AMB. DORE GOLD | BRIG.-GEN. (RES.) YOSSI KUPERWASSER AMB. ALAN BAKER | PROF. ASA KASHER | AMB. FREDDY EYTAN Jerusalem Center for Public Affairs DR. IRWIN MANSDORF | DAN DIKER | JENNIFER ROSKIES Jerusalem Center for Public Affairs LESSONS FROM ISRAEL’S RESPONSE TO TERRORISM Fiamma Nirenstein (ed.) Amb. Dore Gold | Brig.-Gen. (res.) Yossi Kuperwasser Amb. Alan Baker | Prof. Asa Kasher | Amb. Freddy Eytan Dr. Irwin Mansdorf | Dan Diker | Jennifer Roskies Jerusalem Center for Public Affairs Read this book online: http://jcpa.org/lessons-israels-response-terrorism/ Cover photo: AP Photo/Sebastian Scheiner, AP Photo/Michael Kappeler © 2017 Jerusalem Center for Public Affairs 13 Tel Hai St., Jerusalem, 92107 Israel Email: [email protected] Tel: 972-2-561-9281 | Fax: 972-2-561-9112 Jerusalem Center Websites: www.jcpa.org (English) | www.jcpa.org.il (Hebrew) www.jcpa-lecape.org (French) | www.jer-zentrum.org (German) www.dailyalert.org The Jerusalem Center for Public Affairs is a non-partisan, not-for-profit organization. ISBN: 978-965-218-136-7 Contents Executive Summary 5 Is the Terror against Europe Different from the Terror against Israel? Amb.
    [Show full text]
  • In Pursuit of Freedom, Justice, Dignity, and Democracy
    In pursuit of freedom, justice, dignity, and democracy Rojava’s social contract Institutional development in (post) – conflict societies “In establishing this Charter, we declare a political system and civil administration founded upon a social contract that reconciles the rich mosaic of Syria through a transitional phase from dictatorship, civil war and destruction, to a new democratic society where civil life and social justice are preserved”. Wageningen University Social Sciences Group MSc Thesis Sociology of Development and Change Menno Molenveld (880211578090) Supervisor: Dr. Ir. J.P Jongerden Co – Supervisor: Dr. Lotje de Vries 1 | “In pursuit of freedom, justice, dignity, and democracy” – Rojava’s social contract Abstract: Societies recovering from Civil War often re-experience violent conflict within a decade. (1) This thesis provides a taxonomy of the different theories that make a claim on why this happens. (2) These theories provide policy instruments to reduce the risk of recurrence, and I asses under what circumstances they can best be implemented. (3) I zoom in on one policy instrument by doing a case study on institutional development in the north of Syria, where governance has been set – up using a social contract. After discussing social contract theory, text analysis and in depth interviews are used to understand the dynamics of (post) conflict governance in the northern parts of Syria. I describe the functioning of several institutions that have been set –up using a social contract and relate it to “the policy instruments” that can be used to mitigate the risk of conflict recurrence. I conclude that (A) different levels of analysis are needed to understand the dynamics in (the north) of Syria and (B) that the social contract provides mechanisms to prevent further conflict and (C) that in terms of assistance the “quality of life instrument” is best suitable for Rojava.
    [Show full text]
  • The Politics of Security in Ninewa: Preventing an ISIS Resurgence in Northern Iraq
    The Politics of Security in Ninewa: Preventing an ISIS Resurgence in Northern Iraq Julie Ahn—Maeve Campbell—Pete Knoetgen Client: Office of Iraq Affairs, U.S. Department of State Harvard Kennedy School Faculty Advisor: Meghan O’Sullivan Policy Analysis Exercise Seminar Leader: Matthew Bunn May 7, 2018 This Policy Analysis Exercise reflects the views of the authors and should not be viewed as representing the views of the US Government, nor those of Harvard University or any of its faculty. Acknowledgements We would like to express our gratitude to the many people who helped us throughout the development, research, and drafting of this report. Our field work in Iraq would not have been possible without the help of Sherzad Khidhir. His willingness to connect us with in-country stakeholders significantly contributed to the breadth of our interviews. Those interviews were made possible by our fantastic translators, Lezan, Ehsan, and Younis, who ensured that we could capture critical information and the nuance of discussions. We also greatly appreciated the willingness of U.S. State Department officials, the soldiers of Operation Inherent Resolve, and our many other interview participants to provide us with their time and insights. Thanks to their assistance, we were able to gain a better grasp of this immensely complex topic. Throughout our research, we benefitted from consultations with numerous Harvard Kennedy School (HKS) faculty, as well as with individuals from the larger Harvard community. We would especially like to thank Harvard Business School Professor Kristin Fabbe and Razzaq al-Saiedi from the Harvard Humanitarian Initiative who both provided critical support to our project.
    [Show full text]
  • The Muslim Woman Activist’: Solidarity Across Difference in the Movement Against the ‘War on Terror’
    ORE Open Research Exeter TITLE ‘The Muslim woman activist’: solidarity across difference in the movement against the ‘War on Terror’ AUTHORS Massoumi, N JOURNAL Ethnicities DEPOSITED IN ORE 13 March 2019 This version available at http://hdl.handle.net/10871/36451 COPYRIGHT AND REUSE Open Research Exeter makes this work available in accordance with publisher policies. A NOTE ON VERSIONS The version presented here may differ from the published version. If citing, you are advised to consult the published version for pagination, volume/issue and date of publication ‘The Muslim woman activist’: solidarity across difference in the movement against the ‘War on Terror’ Abstract Feminist scholars have widely noted the centrality of gendered discourses to the ‘War on Terror’. This article shows how gendered narratives also shaped the collective identities of those opposing the ‘War on Terror’. Using interview data and analysis of newspaper editorials from movement leaders alongside focus groups with grassroots Muslim women activists, this article demonstrates how, in responding to the cynical use of women’s rights to justify war, participants in the anti- ‘War on Terror’ movement offered an alternative story. Movement activists deployed representations of Muslim women’s agency to challenge the trope of the ‘oppressed Muslim woman’. I argue that these representations went beyond strategic counter-narratives and offered an emotional basis for solidarity. Yet, respondents in the focus groups illustrated the challenges of seeking agency through an ascribed identity; in that they simultaneously refused and relied upon dominant terms of the debate about Muslim women. Keywords Muslim women, social movements, war on terror, collective identity, symbol Introduction Something horrible flits across the background in scenes from Afghanistan, scuttling out of sight.
    [Show full text]
  • A Kurdish-Speaking Community of Change: How Social and Political Organising Takes Shape in the PYD-Controlled Areas in Syria
    A Kurdish-Speaking Community of Change: How Social and Political Organising takes Shape in the PYD-controlled Areas in Syria Thesis submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements of the degree of Master of Arts In Middle Eastern Studies Author: Harriet Ida Rump Advisor: Lory Janelle Dance Examiner: Vittorio Felci Date: 11.12.14 Acknowledgements I devote my deepest gratitude to the brave and engaged participants of this research, without their reflections, insights, and generous will to share ideas, this thesis would never have been realised. In the same breath I sincerely thank Lina Myritz for taking the travel with me to Syria, and for inspiring me continuously. I strongly thank my supervisor Lory Dance, she is an inspirational role model with her critical thoughts and writings, which open up for new methods of research. I am particularly appreciative of all the inputs and perspectives from Farhiya Khalid, Mia Sung Kjaergaard, Søren Rafn, Frederik Johannisson, and Mette Lundsfryd, who all have encouraged me with significant comments. A special thank goes to Lasse Sander for carefully proofreading the thesis in high speed. Finally, for the love and support of all my wonderful friends and family, I am truly thankful. 2 Abstract This thesis explores current trends in social and political organising in Northern Syria, an area controlled by the PYD.1 The research is built on discussions between eight participants from the Syrian Kurdish-speaking community living in the areas. While most discourses on Syria and the Kurdish-speaking community have a macro-political focus and produce racialising descriptions of “Kurdishness” in Syria, less attention is granted to bottom-up organising and the plurality of Kurdishness.
    [Show full text]
  • Islamic Radicalization in the Uk: Index of Radicalization
    ISLAMIC RADICALIZATION IN THE UK: INDEX OF RADICALIZATION Anna Wojtowicz, (Research Assistant, ICT) Sumer 2012 ABSTRACT The purpose of this paper is to analyze the process of radicalization amongst British Muslims in the United Kingdom. It begins with a review of the Muslim population, demographics and community structure. Further presenting several internal and external indicators that influenced and led to radicalization of Muslim youth in Britain. The paper concludes that there is no one certainty for what causes radicalization amongst Muslims in United Kingdom. However, it is certain that Islamic radicalization and the emergence of a homegrown threat is a growing trend that jeopardizes the countries security, peace and stability. Radicalization in the United Kingdom is an existing concern that needs to be addressed and acted upon immediately. Misunderstanding or underestimating the threat may lead to further and long term consequences. * The views expressed in this publication are solely those of the author(s) and do not necessarily reflect the views of the International Institute for Counter-Terrorism (ICT). 2 I. Introduction 4 II. Background 5 History of the Muslim Community in the United Kingdom 5 Population 7 Geographical Concentration of Muslims 8 Ethnic Background 10 Age Estimate 11 Occupation and Socio-Economic Conditions 11 Religious and Cultural Aspects 13 Multiculturalism 17 Islamophobia 20 Converts 21 Case Studies –London, Birmingham, Bradford, Leeds, Leicester 22 III. Organizations 28 Organizations within the United Kingdom 28 Mosques, Koranic Schools and Islamic Centers 34 Student Groups 40 Islamic Websites and TV 43 IV. Radicalization in Britain 43 Theoretical Background and Causes of Radicalization 43 Recruitment and Radicalization: Overlook 47 Radicalization Process 49 Forms of Financing 51 Radical Groups and Movements in the UK 53 Influential Leaders in the UK 60 Inspiration and Influence from Abroad 67 Sunni 67 Shia 70 3 V.
    [Show full text]
  • Violations of the Turkish Army in Rojava
    Foreign Affairs Commission in Al-Jazeera Canton Rojava –North Syria Violations of the Turkish Army 12, October ,2016 1 Index : Introduction ……………………………… 3 Al-Jazeera Canton - Beating civilian cases 2015 …………… 4 - 6 - Beating civilian cases 2016 …………… 7 - 17 - Shooting Civilian cases ……………….. 18 - 27 - Killing civilian cases …………………... 28 - 36 - Transgressing lands …………………… 37 - 40 Kobani Canton - Killing civilians on the borders ………... 41 - 43 - Injuring civilians ……………………….. 44 - 45 - Transgressing lands …………………….. 46 - 47 Afrin Canton - Beating civilians cases …………………… 48 - 49 - Transgressing lands …………………....... 50 – 52 Contributors …………………………………………… 53 2 Violations of the Turkish Army in Rojava Introduction: According to the principles of the Universal Declaration of Human Rights proclaimed on 10 December 1948 by General Assembly resolution 217(III) A , and what is mentioned in the Declaration on the Protection of All Persons from Being Subjected to Torture and Other Cruel, Inhuman or Degrading Treatment or Punishment adopted by the General Assembly resolution 3452 (XXX) on 9 December 1975, and the four Geneva Conventions relative to the protection of civilian persons in time of war in 1949 and the additional protocols of 1979 . Accordingly, it is the right of individuals and groups to sue whoever violates the agreed upon laws and principles and agreements by the international community to protect them and preserve their rights, especially those fleeing from areas of conflict and war whether civilians or soldiers , by legal or illegal ways through ports or international borders. We observed and documented scores of cases of beating and killing of civilians on the Turkish-Syrian border by the Turkish border guards. Therefore, out of moral responsibility and our legal and jurist commitment to the principles and laws of the international and humanitarian community ,we decided to submit this file to the relevant international bodies .
    [Show full text]
  • Identification of the Non-Professional Territorial Armed Formations on the MENA Region
    Securitologia No 1/2016 Maciej Paszyn National Defence University, Warsaw, Poland Identification of the non-professional territorial armed formations on the MENA Region Abstract Middle East and North Africa (MENA) region is characterized by a high incidence of local intrastate or international armed conflicts. In the vast majority of cases, in these operations are involved the non-professional territorial armed forces. These are military organizations composed of volunteers living various local communities. This article shows the role and significance of these formations on the example of the civil war in Syria. Keywords: armed conflict, MENA region, territorial defence, Syrian Civil War, Free Syrian Army, Peoples Protection Units DOI: 10.5604/01.3001.0009.3835 ISSN: 1898-4509 ISSN: 2449-7436 online pdf E-mail contact to the Author: [email protected] 121 Maciej Paszyn Introduction Starting from the beginning of the mass anti-government protests called “The Arab Spring”1, 17 December 2010, in the Middle East and North Africa hereinafter referred to as the MENA, observed a significant number of armed conflicts. General character- istics of the listed conflicts defines them in the vast majority, as Non-international, anti- government military operations characterized in certain cases, as the substrate religious and activities of the international organization of Sunni-called “Islamic state” (IS)2. Described conflicts have been observed in areas such countries as Iraq, Yemen, Leb- anon, Libya and Syria. It should be noted that these are unfinished conflicts with highly dynamic events, which making it difficult to conduct research and will outdated infor- mation in certain cases.
    [Show full text]