Network Devices Configuration Guide

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Network Devices Configuration Guide PacketFence v11.0.0 Version 11.0.0 - September 2021 Table of Contents 1. About this Guide . 2 1.1. Other sources of information . 2 2. Note on Inline enforcement support. 3 3. Note on RADIUS accounting . 4 4. List of supported Network Devices. 5 5. Switch configuration . 6 5.1. Assumptions . 6 5.2. 3COM . 6 5.3. Alcatel . 12 5.4. AlliedTelesis . 16 5.5. Amer . 21 5.6. Aruba. 22 5.7. Avaya. 24 5.8. Brocade. 25 5.9. Cisco . 28 5.10. Cisco Small Business (SMB) . 61 5.11. D-Link. 63 5.12. Dell . 65 5.13. Edge core . 70 5.14. Enterasys . 71 5.15. Extreme Networks. 74 5.16. Foundry . 78 5.17. H3C . 80 5.18. HP . 83 5.19. HP ProCurve . 84 5.20. Huawei . 94 5.21. IBM . 97 5.22. Intel. 98 5.23. Juniper . 98 5.24. LG-Ericsson . 104 5.25. Linksys . 105 5.26. Netgear . 106 5.27. Nortel . 108 5.28. Pica8. 110 5.29. SMC . 111 5.30. Ubiquiti. 112 6. Wireless Controllers and Access Point Configuration . 116 6.1. Assumptions. 116 6.2. Unsupported Equipment . 116 6.3. Aerohive Networks . 117 6.4. Anyfi Networks . 135 6.5. Avaya . 138 6.6. Aruba . 138 6.7. Belair Networks (now Ericsson) . 158 6.8. Bluesocket . 158 6.9. Brocade . 159 6.10. Cambium . 159 6.11. Cisco. 163 6.12. CoovaChilli. 204 6.13. D-Link. 206 6.14. Extricom . 206 6.15. Fortinet FortiGate . 207 6.16. Hostapd . 208 6.17. Huawei . ..

287

Copy Link

Recommended publications

A Letter to the FCC [PDF]
Before the FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Washington, DC 20554 In the Matter of ) ) Amendment of Part 0, 1, 2, 15 and 18 of the ) ET Docket No. 15170 Commission’s Rules regarding Authorization ) Of Radio frequency Equipment ) ) Request for the Allowance of Optional ) RM11673 Electronic Labeling for Wireless Devices ) Summary The rules laid out in ET Docket No. 15170 should not go into effect as written. They would cause more harm than good and risk a significant overreach of the Commission’s authority. Specifically, the rules would limit the ability to upgrade or replace firmware in commercial, offtheshelf home or smallbusiness routers. This would damage the compliance, security, reliability and functionality of home and business networks. It would also restrict innovation and research into new networking technologies. We present an alternate proposal that better meets the goals of the FCC, not only ensuring the desired operation of the RF portion of a WiFi router within the mandated parameters, but also assisting in the FCC’s broader goals of increasing consumer choice, fostering competition, protecting infrastructure, and increasing resiliency to communication disruptions. If the Commission does not intend to prohibit the upgrade or replacement of firmware in WiFi devices, the undersigned would welcome a clear statement of that intent. Introduction We recommend the FCC pursue an alternative path to ensuring Radio Frequency (RF) compliance from WiFi equipment. We understand there are significant concerns regarding existing users of the WiFi spectrum, and a desire to avoid uncontrolled change. However, we most strenuously advise against prohibiting changes to firmware of devices containing radio components, and furthermore advise against allowing nonupdatable devices into the field.
[Show full text]
Extreme Networks EXOS V12.3.6.2 EAL3+ ST
Extreme Networks, Inc. ExtremeXOS Network Operating System v12.3.6.2 Security Target Evaluation Assurance Level: EAL3+ Document Version: 0.9 Prepared for: Prepared by: Extreme Networks, Inc. Corsec Security, Inc. 3585 Monroe Street 13135 Lee Jackson Memorial Hwy., Suite 220 Santa Clara, CA 95051 Fairfax, VA 22033 Phone: +1 408 579 2800 Phone: +1 703 267 6050 http://www.extremenetworks.com http://www.corsec.c om Security Target , Version 0.9 March 12, 2012 Table of Contents 1 INTRODUCTION ................................................................................................................... 4 1.1 PURPOSE ................................................................................................................................................................ 4 1.2 SECURITY TARGET AND TOE REFERENCES ...................................................................................................... 4 1.3 TOE OVERVIEW ................................................................................................................................................... 5 1.3.1 TOE Environment ................................................................................................................................................... 5 1.4 TOE DESCRIPTION .............................................................................................................................................. 6 1.4.1 Architecture .............................................................................................................................................................
[Show full text]
Network Devices Configuration Guide for Packetfence Version 6.5.0 Network Devices Configuration Guide by Inverse Inc
Network Devices Configuration Guide for PacketFence version 6.5.0 Network Devices Configuration Guide by Inverse Inc. Version 6.5.0 - Jan 2017 Copyright © 2017 Inverse inc. Permission is granted to copy, distribute and/or modify this document under the terms of the GNU Free Documentation License, Version 1.2 or any later version published by the Free Software Foundation; with no Invariant Sections, no Front-Cover Texts, and no Back-Cover Texts. A copy of the license is included in the section entitled "GNU Free Documentation License". The fonts used in this guide are licensed under the SIL Open Font License, Version 1.1. This license is available with a FAQ at: http:// scripts.sil.org/OFL Copyright © Łukasz Dziedzic, http://www.latofonts.com, with Reserved Font Name: "Lato". Copyright © Raph Levien, http://levien.com/, with Reserved Font Name: "Inconsolata". Table of Contents About this Guide ............................................................................................................... 1 Other sources of information ..................................................................................... 1 Note on Inline enforcement support ................................................................................... 2 List of supported Network Devices ..................................................................................... 3 Switch configuration .......................................................................................................... 4 Assumptions ............................................................................................................
[Show full text]
Glossaire Des Protocoles Réseau
Glossaire des protocoles réseau - EDITION LIVRES POUR TOUS - http://www.livrespourtous.com/ Mai 2009 A ALOHAnet ALOHAnet, également connu sous le nom ALOHA, est le premier réseau de transmission de données faisant appel à un média unique. Il a été développé par l'université d'Hawaii. Il a été mis en service en 1970 pour permettre les transmissions de données par radio entre les îles. Bien que ce réseau ne soit plus utilisé, ses concepts ont été repris par l'Ethernet. Histoire C'est Norman Abramson qui est à l'origine du projet. L'un des buts était de créer un réseau à faible coût d'exploitation pour permettre la réservation des chambres d'hôtels dispersés dans l'archipel d'Hawaï. Pour pallier l'absence de lignes de transmissions, l'idée fut d'utiliser les ondes radiofréquences. Au lieu d'attribuer une fréquence à chaque transmission comme on le faisait avec les technologies de l'époque, tout le monde utiliserait la même fréquence. Un seul support (l'éther) et une seule fréquence allaient donner des collisions entre paquets de données. Le but était de mettre au point des protocoles permettant de résoudre les collisions qui se comportent comme des perturbations analogues à des parasites. Les techniques de réémission permettent ainsi d'obtenir un réseau fiable sur un support qui ne l'est pas. APIPA APIPA (Automatic Private Internet Protocol Addressing) ou IPv4LL est un processus qui permet à un système d'exploitation de s'attribuer automatiquement une adresse IP, lorsque le serveur DHCP est hors service. APIPA utilise la plage d'adresses IP 169.254.0.0/16 (qu'on peut également noter 169.254.0.0/255.255.0.0), c'est-à-dire la plage dont les adresses vont de 169.254.0.0 à 169.254.255.255.
[Show full text]
Debian \ Amber \ Arco-Debian \ Arc-Live \ Aslinux \ Beatrix
Debian \ Amber \ Arco-Debian \ Arc-Live \ ASLinux \ BeatriX \ BlackRhino \ BlankON \ Bluewall \ BOSS \ Canaima \ Clonezilla Live \ Conducit \ Corel \ Xandros \ DeadCD \ Olive \ DeMuDi \ \ 64Studio (64 Studio) \ DoudouLinux \ DRBL \ Elive \ Epidemic \ Estrella Roja \ Euronode \ GALPon MiniNo \ Gibraltar \ GNUGuitarINUX \ gnuLiNex \ \ Lihuen \ grml \ Guadalinex \ Impi \ Inquisitor \ Linux Mint Debian \ LliureX \ K-DEMar \ kademar \ Knoppix \ \ B2D \ \ Bioknoppix \ \ Damn Small Linux \ \ \ Hikarunix \ \ \ DSL-N \ \ \ Damn Vulnerable Linux \ \ Danix \ \ Feather \ \ INSERT \ \ Joatha \ \ Kaella \ \ Kanotix \ \ \ Auditor Security Linux \ \ \ Backtrack \ \ \ Parsix \ \ Kurumin \ \ \ Dizinha \ \ \ \ NeoDizinha \ \ \ \ Patinho Faminto \ \ \ Kalango \ \ \ Poseidon \ \ MAX \ \ Medialinux \ \ Mediainlinux \ \ ArtistX \ \ Morphix \ \ \ Aquamorph \ \ \ Dreamlinux \ \ \ Hiwix \ \ \ Hiweed \ \ \ \ Deepin \ \ \ ZoneCD \ \ Musix \ \ ParallelKnoppix \ \ Quantian \ \ Shabdix \ \ Symphony OS \ \ Whoppix \ \ WHAX \ LEAF \ Libranet \ Librassoc \ Lindows \ Linspire \ \ Freespire \ Liquid Lemur \ Matriux \ MEPIS \ SimplyMEPIS \ \ antiX \ \ \ Swift \ Metamorphose \ miniwoody \ Bonzai \ MoLinux \ \ Tirwal \ NepaLinux \ Nova \ Omoikane (Arma) \ OpenMediaVault \ OS2005 \ Maemo \ Meego Harmattan \ PelicanHPC \ Progeny \ Progress \ Proxmox \ PureOS \ Red Ribbon \ Resulinux \ Rxart \ SalineOS \ Semplice \ sidux \ aptosid \ \ siduction \ Skolelinux \ Snowlinux \ srvRX live \ Storm \ Tails \ ThinClientOS \ Trisquel \ Tuquito \ Ubuntu \ \ A/V \ \ AV \ \ Airinux \ \ Arabian
[Show full text]
Comparing Embedded Linux Build Systems and Distros
Comparing embedded Linux build systems and distros Drew Moseley Solutions Architect Mender.io Session overview ● Review of embedded Linux development challenges. ● Define build system and criteria. ● Discuss a few popular options. ● Give me an opportunity to learn about some of the other tools. Goal: Help new embedded Linux developers get started About me Drew Moseley Mender.io ○ 10 years in Embedded Linux/Yocto development. ○ Over-the-air updater for Embedded Linux ○ Longer than that in general Embedded Software. ○ Open source (Apache License, v2) ○ Project Lead and Solutions Architect. ○ Dual A/B rootfs layout (client) [email protected] ○ Remote deployment management (server) https://twitter.com/drewmoseley https://www.linkedin.com/in/drewmoseley/ ○ Under active development https://twitter.com/mender_io Challenges for Embedded Linux Developers Hardware variety Storage Media Software may be maintained in forks Cross development Initial device provisioning Simple Makefiles don't cut it (anymore) Facts: ● These systems are huge ● Dependency Hell is a thing ● Builds take a long time ● Builds take a lot of resources ● Embedded applications require significant customization ● Developers need to modify from defaults Build System Defined _Is_ _Is Not_ ● Mechanism to specify and build ● An IDE ○ Define hardware/BSP ● A Distribution components ● A deployment and provisioning ○ Integrate user-space tool applications; including custom ● An out-of-the-box solution code ● Need reproducibility ● Must support multiple developers ● Allow for parallel
[Show full text]
Sintesi Catalogo Competenze 2
Internet of Things Competenze Campi di applicazione • Progettazione e sviluppo di firmware su micro • Monitoraggio ambientale meteorologico di para- controllori a basso e bassissimo consumo quali ad metri climatici e parametri della qualità dell’aria, esempio Arduino, Microchip, NXP, Texas Instru- anche in mobilità ments e Freescale • Monitoraggio ambientale distribuito per l’agricol- • Sviluppo su PC embedded basati su processori tura di precisione ARM e sistema operativo Linux quali ad esempio • Monitoraggio della qualità dell’acqua e dei parame- Portux, Odroid, RaspberryPI ed Nvidia Jetson tri di rischio ambientale (alluvioni, frane, ecc.) • Progettazione e sviluppo di Wired e Wireless Sen- • Monitoraggio di ambienti indoor (scuole, bibliote- sor Networks basate su standard quali ZigBee, che, uffici pubblici, ecc) SimpliciTI, 6LoWPAN, 802.15.4 e Modbus • Smart building: efficienza energetica, comfort am- • Progettazione e sviluppo di sistemi ad alimentazio- bientale e sicurezza ne autonoma e soluzioni di Energy harvesting • Utilizzo di piattaforme microUAV per misure distri- • Ottimizzazione di software e protocolli wireless buite, per applicazioni di fotogrammetria, teleme- per l’uso efficiente dell’energia all’interno di nodi tria e cartografia, per sistemi di navigazione auto- ad alimentazione autonoma matica basata su sensoristica e image processing, • Design e prototipazione (con strumenti CAD, pianificazione e gestione delle missioni stampante 3D, ecc) di circuiti elettronici per l’inte- • Smart Grid locale per l’ottimizzazione
[Show full text]
Presentación De Openwrt Por Jorge Vargas En
OPENWRT POR JORGE VARGAS OPENWRT Distribución de linux para dispositivos embebidos Proviene de Linksys WRT54G Empezo en el 2004 OPENWRT Los nombres de las versiones son bebidas alcoholicas: White Russian Kamikaze Backre Attitude Adjustment Barrier Breaker Chaos Calmer Designated Driver OPENWRT El espacio de usuario es ash, uClibc o musl, y busybox con muchos scripts en lua Manejador de paquetes opkg Unied Conguration Interface (UCI) Conguras todo en un solo lugar - /etc/cong Puedes usar un editor de texto, CLI o GUI Sencillo hacer backups de tu conguracion PROYECTOS SIMILARES DD-WRT Tomato LibreCMC DebianWRT CONTRAS DD-WRT: Es muy dicil realizar contribuciones. Tomato: La licencia de la interfaz de usuario es restrictiva. LibreCMC: OpenWrt sin blobs binarios. DebianWRT: Es Debian. PROFUNDIZANDO Bootloader Arquitecturas Memoria Flash BOOTLOADER En dispositivos embebidos, un "bootloader" inicializa el hardware y luego carga el kernel. Bootloader -> Kernel. Comparado con una PC, que es BIOS -> Grub -> Kernel Das U-Boot (GPL) es el bootloader mas comun BOOTLOADER Los fabricantes tienden a modicar el bootloader Limites de tamano de kernel arbitrarios Valores magicos necesitan estar presentes en el kernel Requieren un formato de rmware especial No soportan ELF Ver http://wiki.openwrt.org/doc/techref/bootloader ARQUITECTURAS La mayoria de los routers son de arquitectura MIPS Tienen una buena relacion rendimiento/costo/poder Tambien soporta ARM, PowerPC y x86 Ver https://dev.openwrt.org/wiki/platforms MEMORIA FLASH Maneja dos formatos principalmente: SquashFS JFFS2 SQUASHFS SquashFS es un sistema de archivos de solo lectura comprimido con LZMA En este tipo de imagen, OpenWrt guarda todo el sistema en una partion de SquashFS, y usa una particion JFFS2 para sobreponer cambios JFFS2 JFFS2 es de lectura/escritura y tambien esta comprimido con LZMA, pero SquashFS es 20-30% mas pequeno SQUASHFS En mi opinion, usar la imagen de SquashFS es la mejor opcion ya que utiliza ambos sistemas de archivos, lo que te permite hacer un "factory reset" COMO EMPEZAR 1.
[Show full text]
Μvirt: Virtualization on Openwrt
μVirt: Virtualization on OpenWrt Mathew McBride <[email protected]> @mcbridematt Why virtualize? ● “Universal CPE” concept ○ Telco point of view: Standardized (“whitebox”) CPE, (Truck)roll once, deploy many ○ Often as a method of extending private cloud to customer “edge” https://www.sdxcentral.com/articles/contributed/understanding-use-universal-cpe/2017/07/ Image from article (ADVA Optical Networking / SDxcentral) Goals ● Demonstrator for small virtualization on ARM64 ● Particular emphasis on “Universal CPE” use case ○ Customer sites with “appliance” spec boxes (typical 4-16GB RAM, <=256GB SSD) ○ Typical setup: Firewall, VoIP, IDS/IPS, SD-WAN VM’s ● Easy to use - works standalone ○ vs OpenStack, Industry (MANO) or commercial NFV stacks. ● Playground for end-to-end solutions ○ Working towards a demonstrator involving central management, SD-WAN/VPN, remote IPMI and full life cycle provisioning via LTE ● Would like to make advanced acceleration techniques available while still integrating with existing OpenWrt config structures Other use cases ● Deploying value add applications to existing fleet ○ E.g Home automation / Smart Home, media servers for residential CPE ○ Some carriers’ residential CPE are in the “micro” uCPE class already ● Multi-tenant virtualized router for MDUs ● Home router and server in a box ○ e.g OpenWrt + NextCloud ● Run software too complex for OpenWrt ● Isolation via VMs Why on OpenWrt? ● Small footprint ○ Fitting inside unmanaged flash (NOR/NAND) provides BOM savings ■ 128MB,1G,64GB,> 128GB price/technology barriers
[Show full text]
Virtual Router Performance
SOFTWARE DEFINED NETWORKING: VIRTUAL ROUTER PERFORMANCE Bachelor Degree Project in Network and System Administration Level ECTS Spring term 2016 Björn Svantesson Supervisor: Jianguo Ding Examiner: Manfred Jeusfeld Table of Contents 1Introduction..........................................................................................................................................1 2Background...........................................................................................................................................2 2.1Virtualization................................................................................................................................2 2.2Hypervisors...................................................................................................................................2 2.3VMware ESXi................................................................................................................................2 2.4Software defined networking.......................................................................................................3 2.5The split of the data and control plane........................................................................................3 2.6Centralization of network control................................................................................................4 2.7Network virtualization..................................................................................................................4 2.8Software routers..........................................................................................................................6
[Show full text]
Red Hat Openstack Platform 12 Networking Guide
Red Hat OpenStack Platform 12 Networking Guide An Advanced Guide to OpenStack Networking Last Updated: 2019-12-04 Red Hat OpenStack Platform 12 Networking Guide An Advanced Guide to OpenStack Networking OpenStack Team [email protected] Legal Notice Copyright © 2019 Red Hat, Inc. The text of and illustrations in this document are licensed by Red Hat under a Creative Commons Attribution–Share Alike 3.0 Unported license ("CC-BY-SA"). An explanation of CC-BY-SA is available at http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/ . In accordance with CC-BY-SA, if you distribute this document or an adaptation of it, you must provide the URL for the original version. Red Hat, as the licensor of this document, waives the right to enforce, and agrees not to assert, Section 4d of CC-BY-SA to the fullest extent permitted by applicable law. Red Hat, Red Hat Enterprise Linux, the Shadowman logo, the Red Hat logo, JBoss, OpenShift, Fedora, the Infinity logo, and RHCE are trademarks of Red Hat, Inc., registered in the United States and other countries. Linux ® is the registered trademark of Linus Torvalds in the United States and other countries. Java ® is a registered trademark of Oracle and/or its affiliates. XFS ® is a trademark of Silicon Graphics International Corp. or its subsidiaries in the United States and/or other countries. MySQL ® is a registered trademark of MySQL AB in the United States, the European Union and other countries. Node.js ® is an official trademark of Joyent. Red Hat is not formally related to or endorsed by the official Joyent Node.js open source or commercial project.
[Show full text]
Openwrt Docs Documentation Release
Openwrt docs Documentation Release People on the internet Nov 12, 2017 Contents 1 Why use LEDE? 3 2 Download LEDE 5 3 LEDE wants you! 7 4 Contents 9 4.1 LEDE Project Information........................................9 4.2 LEDE Documentation.......................................... 14 5 Endorsements 31 i ii Openwrt docs Documentation, Release The LEDE Project (“Linux Embedded Development Environment”) is a Linux operating system based on OpenWrt. It is a complete replacement for the vendor-supplied firmware of a wide range of wireless routers and non-network devices. See the Table of Hardware for supported devices. For more information about LEDE Project organization, see the About LEDE page. Contents 1 Openwrt docs Documentation, Release 2 Contents CHAPTER 1 Why use LEDE? People install LEDE because they believe it works better than the stock firmware from their vendor. They find it is more stable, offers more features, is more secure and has better support. • Extensibility: LEDE provides many capabilities found only in high-end devices. Its 3000+ application packages are standardized, so you can easily replicate the same setup on any supported device, including two (or even five) year old routers. More about extensibility... • Security: LEDE’s standard installation is secure by default, with Wi-Fi disabled, no poor passwords or back- doors. LEDE’s software components are kept up-to-date, so vulnerabilities get closed shortly after they are discovered. More about security... • Performance and Stability: LEDE firmware is made of standardized modules used in all supported devices. This means each module will likely receive more testing and bug fixing than stock firmware which can be tweaked for each product line and never touched again.
[Show full text]