Pepsi: Can a Soda Really Make the World a Better Place?

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Pepsi: Can a Soda Really Make the World a Better Place? Short Case Pepsi: Can a Soda Really Make The World a Better Place? This year, PepsiCo did something that shocked the advertising world. After 23 straight years of running ads for its flagship brand on the Super Bowl, it announced that the number-two soft drink maker would be absent from the Big Game. But in the weeks leading up to Super Bowl XLIV, Pepsi was still the second-most discussed advertiser associated with the event. It wasn’t so much what Pepsi wasn’t doing that created such a stir as much as what it was doing. Rather than continuing with the same old messages of the past, focusing on the youthful nature of the Pepsi Generation, and using the same old mass-media channels, Pepsi is taking a major gamble by breaking new ground with its advertising program. Its latest campaign, called Pepsi Refresh, represents a major departure from its old promotion efforts in two ways: (1) The message centers on a theme of social responsibility, and (2) the message is being delivered with a fat dose of social media. At the center of the campaign is the Pepsi Refresh Project. PepsiCo has committed to award $20 million in grants ranging from $5,000 to $250,000 to organizations and individuals with ideas that will make the world a better place. The refresheverything.com Web site greets visitors with the headline, “What do you care about?” PepsiCo accepts up to 1,000 proposals each month in each of six different areas: health, arts and culture, food and shelter, the planet, neighborhoods, and education. Then crowdsourcing takes over, as consumers vote for their favorites. Pepsi awards the grants each month. One- third of the way through its one-year run, the company had funded more than 100 projects, giving approximately $5 million back to local communities. The company stated that the project was right on target to award the full $20 million by the end of the yearlong effort. INTEGRATING DIGITAL THROUGHOUT THE PROMOTIONAL MIX The Pepsi Refresh campaign has been a groundbreaking effort, in part because of its heavy use of social media. PepsiCo is capitalizing on a growing trend in a way that no other major brand has done so far. The company is quick to point out that Pepsi Refresh is not a social media add-on like almost others, where an ad simply directs people to a Web site for reasons that may or may not be relevant to the message. Nor is it a social media campaign as such, where the entire campaign takes place through social media. Rather, social media are the glue that holds together a truly integrated marketing communications effort. “It’s not about digital as its own channel anymore,” says Bonin Bough, director of digital and social media for PepsiCo. “It’s how do we infuse digital across all of our marketing programs?” For starters, although PepsiCo bypassed the Super Bowl, it is not ditching broadcast media. To the contrary, Pepsi is running spot ads on the main networks as well as 30 different cable channels. The ads initially informed people about the Pepsi Refresh campaign, directing them to the refresheverything.com site. But shortly after the first grants were awarded, ads began highlighting projects that had been funded. Traditional media efforts extend to 10 print publications as well. And PR plays a role through agreements such as the one with NBC Universal for paid pitches on the “Today” show. But this campaign underscores a shift in how PepsiCo is spending its advertising dollars. According to CEO Indra Nooyi, the world’s number two soft drink seller is shifting as much as one-third of its marketing budget to interactive and social media. This move involves not only the Pepsi brand but also Mountain Dew, Doritos, Sobe, and PepsiCo’s other brands. Certainly, PepsiCo is not alone in the trend toward digital and social media marketing. But analysts point out that its approach, moving away from high-profile spots in favor of heavy spending on a digitally focused social responsibility campaign, is both compelling and risky. “I applaud Pepsi for embracing social media and technology,” said Marc Lucas, an advertising executive. “On the flip side, I think it’s very bold to not be in a place where you know you’re going to have an audience.” The refresheverything.com Web site is just one component of the brand’s online efforts. PepsiCo is spreading the message through the big networks, such as Facebook and Twitter, and even partnering with them for advertising opportunities. For example, Pepsi Refresh held the lead ad position on Facebook during the Super Bowl. Pepsi has also partnered with Hulu to sponsor its first original series, the reality show If I Can Dream. “It amplifies an advertising campaign by making it something people talk about, more of a social conversation,” said Jean-Paul Colaco, senior vice president for advertising at Hulu. PepsiCo even partnered with Spin magazine, music festival South by Southwest, and two Indie bands in a Web-based contest where music lovers could vote for their favorite. Metric beat out Broken Social Scene for a $100,000 grant that it gave to the Women’s Funding Network. As another component of the integrated campaign, the company has not shied away from using celebrity endorsers. Through clever network spot ads that place celebrities inside a life-sized, three-dimensional laptop made of tagboard, Kevin Bacon appeals to people to vote for his cause, SixDegrees.org. He is quick to point out that this has nothing to do with the cult trivia game, Six Degrees of Kevin Bacon. Rather, he proposes using a $250,000 grant to hand out “good cards” that people can use to donate to any of more than a million different charities. But Bacon goes on to explain that the power of SixDegrees comes from the social networks of good card recipients. They buy more good cards and pass them on to others, and as social networking works its magic, that $250,000 grows into millions. Among various other celebrities, Pepsi has also recruited Demi Moore; NFL players Mark Sanchez, DeMarcus Ware, and Drew Brees; and NASCAR veterans Jeff Gordon, Dale Earnhardt Jr., and Jimmie Johnson to apply for grants and act as spokespersons for the project. These celebrities are vying for votes to award grants to such organizations as the Girls Education and Mentoring Service, the American Cancer Society, and the Brain Aneurysm Foundation. PepsiCo is also getting its message out to consumers at the point of purchase. Cans, bottles, and multipacks feature updated graphics that minimize an all lowercase Pepsi logo written vertically and highlights a new Pepsi brand mark: a large circle with swaths of red, white, and blue. That symbol replaces any “o” in Pepsi’s packaging and promotional materials. Thus, both “Do Some Good” and “Doing Good 101” each carry four of the new Pepsi circles. To draw people into retailer outlets to see the pointof- purchase (POP) materials and hopefully buy its soft drinks, Pepsi has partnered with Foursquare, the social network that connects people through GPS in real time. Foursquare members are directed to Pepsi retailers and given offers as an incentive for them to visit. DOING WELL BY DOING GOOD Despite the growth of cause-related marketing, PepsiCo’s effort is perhaps the first example of a major brand making social responsibility the main theme of its campaign, rather than an add-on. This does not downplay the efforts of companies like Target, which has given $273 million to local schools since 1997 through its RedCard program. But PepsiCo’s effort is built around a theme that drives the concept of “doing good” as much as it drives the brand. CocaCola’s response to Pepsi Refresh, donating a dollar to Boys and Girls Clubs of America each time a visitor to Coke’s Facebook page shares a virtual Coke gift, illustrates how most advertiser’s cause-related marketing efforts are peripheral to other advertising activities. Nooyi brings the centrality of Pepsi’s socially responsible message into perspective. The Pepsi Refresh Project is a platform, but at the end of the day, what we are doing is awarding the grants, we are enabling connections. It’s having a catalytic effect on people who are actually embracing these organizations. So, we’re not only benefiting the person who received the grant, we’re benefiting the people who are the recipients of the outcome of that idea. With schools, for instance, it’s not just one classroom that’s benefited. It’s all the kids who will be able to go to that classroom. And there have been people who have worked so hard to get this money that others have stepped in and matched the money they receive. Projects funded thus far are too numerous to list. But they include more than high-profile efforts like the celebrity campaigns. Many awards are being given to everyday people just trying to improve their own little corners of the world. Calvin Cannon received $5,000 for Clothe the N.A.K.E.D. Prom Date, his venture to sponsor low-income, upstanding dudes in Shelbyville, Tennessee, by paying for their tuxedo rentals for the prom. Jeanne Acutanza from Kirkland, Washington, got $5,000 for her children’s school so that it could manage a sustainable garden and give the harvest to local food banks. And the Associates of Redlands Bowl received $25,000 to support performing arts in the community of Redlands, California. “I’m proud of every idea we’re supporting, but it’s the simplicity of [these ideas that is] so innovative,” says Nooyi.
Recommended publications
  • Cultural Imperialism and Globalization in Pepsi Marketing
    Cultural Imperialism and Globalization in Pepsi Marketing The increased speed and flow of information brought about by technology has influenced a massive global culture shift. Two consequences of this increased information exchange are cultural imperialism and globalization. Cultural imperialism is a heavily debated concept that “refers to how an ideology, a politics, or a way of life is exported into other territories through the export of cultural products” (Struken and Cartwright 397). The related concept of globalization “describes the progression of forces that have accelerated the interdependence of peoples to the point at which we can speak of a true world community” (Struken and Cartwright 405). A driving force of both cultural imperialism and globalization are major corporations, many of which are based in the United States. Brands like Pepsi are now known worldwide and not simply confined to one particular country or the western sphere. These global brands can be viewed “as homogenizing forces, selling the same tastes and styles throughout diverse cultures” (Stuken and Cartwright 402). Conversely, viewers in other countries are free to “appropriate what they see to make new meanings, meanings that may be not just different from but even oppositional to the ideologies” of these global advertising campaigns. By analyzing three recent aspects of Pepsi’s “Live for Now” global campaign, I will examine their relationship to cultural imperialism and globalization, as well as show how the use of an interactive website accounts for a multitude of factors to become the most effective aspect of the campaign. The Global Branding of Pepsi Advertising Pepsi cola was created in United States in the 1890s and originally sold as medicine (The Soda Museum).
    [Show full text]
  • Consumerism, Art, and Identity in American Culture
    ABSTRACT OKAY, MAYBE YOU ARE YOUR KHAKIS: CONSUMERISM, ART, AND IDENTITY IN AMERICAN CULTURE by Meghan Triplett Bickerstaff This thesis explores the evolving relationship between the cultural realms of art and the marketplace. The practice of “coolhunting,” or finding original fashions and ideas to co-opt and market to a mainstream audience, is increasingly being used in corporate America. The Toyota Scion and its advertising campaign are examples of such commodification, and they are considered within the context of Roland Marchand and Thomas Frank’s histories and theories of advertising. The novels Pattern Recognition by William Gibson and The Savage Girl by Alex Shakar both feature main characters who are coolhunters, and both approach the problem of the imposition of capital into the realm of art but formulate responses to the problem very differently. This literature offers insight into the important relationship between consumption and identity in American culture in the early twenty-first century. Okay, Maybe You Are Your Khakis: Consumerism, Art, and Identity in American Culture A Thesis Submitted to the Faculty of Miami University in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the Degree of Master of the Arts Department of English by Meghan Triplett Bickerstaff Miami University Oxford, Ohio 2004 _________________________ Advisor: C. Barry Chabot _________________________ Reader: Timothy D. Melley _________________________ Reader: Whitney A. Womack Table of Contents Chapter 1: They’re Selling Us Aspirin for Our Broken Hearts 1 Chapter 2: Time, Space, and Critical Distance in Pattern Recognition 13 Chapter 3: The Savage Girl as an Oppositional Text 22 Chapter 4: Attention Shoppers: Authenticity is Dead, But Please Don’t 37 Stop Looking for It Works Cited 47 ii Acknowledgements I am lucky to have had a warm and positive environment in which to work, and I would like to extend my gratitude toward several people who made this possible.
    [Show full text]
  • Even Better Than the Real Thing
    Providence College DigitalCommons@Providence History & Classics Student Scholarship History & Classics 4-30-2016 Even Better than the Real Thing Nicholas Moran Providence College Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.providence.edu/history_papers_proj Part of the Cultural History Commons Moran, Nicholas, "Even Better than the Real Thing" (2016). History & Classics Student Scholarship. 1. https://digitalcommons.providence.edu/history_papers_proj/1 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the History & Classics at DigitalCommons@Providence. It has been accepted for inclusion in History & Classics Student Scholarship by an authorized administrator of DigitalCommons@Providence. For more information, please contact [email protected]. Nicholas Moran 4/30/16 Even Better than the Real Thing In the summer of 1984, teens watching MTV for hours on end were in for a surprise during the commercial break. Instead of having to sit through a dull lawyer’s tired sales pitch to call if injured or a horrific low-budget car dealership commercial, the beat to Michael Jackson’s Billie Jean began to blare from the speakers. On the screen teens flooded the street dancing to the beat, all of them led by a teen dressed just like the King of Pop himself. Suddenly the lyrics kicked in, as the actual Michael Jackson sang that these teens were a “whole new generation… the Pepsi generation.”1 It was current, upbeat, hip, endorsed by one of the biggest stars in America, and most importantly it was entirely targeted to “twelve to twenty-four” year olds.2 Coupled with “Pepsi Challenge” taste tests showing that Americans preferred the sweeter taste of Pepsi to the tarter Coke, the bright lights of the ultra- modern Pepsi campaign began to draw away young consumers from the old and traditional Coca Cola.
    [Show full text]
  • A Study on Pepsi
    Research Article, ISSN 2304-2613 (Print); ISSN 2305-8730 (Online); Prefix 10.18034 Rethinking Brand Identity to Become an Iconic Brand - A Study on Pepsi Reaz Hafiz* Lecturer, School of Business Studies, Southeast University, Dhaka, BANGLADESH *E-mail for correspondence: [email protected] Cell Phone: +8801614336620 Received: Jul 14, 2015; Accepted: Aug 03, 2015 ABSTRACT One of the leading brands, Pepsi has battled time to time for getting success in the Cola industry by developing different slogans, ideas, celebrity endorsement, campaigns and other marketing efforts. These never ending quests for growth and market share are not always ended with positive notes because of miss fire of strategies. The focus of the paper is to identify current position and rebranding issues regarding Pepsi along with the ways to make it an iconic brand. In the first part of this paper, Holt’s concept has been used to analyze Pepsi Cola’s history and current position to establish whether and if yes to which extent this brand has managed to become iconic. The second part is dedicated towards developing and suggesting a future course of action for the company that would enable it once again becoming an iconic brand. Keywords: Pepsi, Brand Identity, Rebranding, Myth JEL Classification Code: M31 INTRODUCTION covers three brand building blocks of national ideology, populist worlds and cultural contradictions. Another In order to stay relevant, and connect with (post)modern objective is to find out a new populist world for Pepsi to consumers and other stakeholders, brands must be embody a new brand myth to become an iconic brand.
    [Show full text]
  • The Pepsi Paradox
    The Pepsi Paradox Master Thesis by Steffen Berg Jensen Investigating the rivalry between Coca-Cola and Pepsi during the 1950s-80s through comparative analysis while incorporating semiotics and emotional branding theory Aalborg University, June 2014 Supervised by David Stevens 1 Abstract The following Master thesis involves the investigation of the following problem: “Why was Coca-Cola’s marketing during “The Golden Age of Advertising” more effective than Pepsi’s and how was Coca-Cola able to sustain its market position despite loosing the taste tests to Pepsi during the 70’s?” The research is based upon the interpretive research tradition and an empirical-inductive scientific approach. The scope of the thesis is Coca-Cola and Pepsi’s advertising from the 1950s-1980s, which is put into the context of American society in that same period of time. The theoretical framework consists of semiotics and emotional branding theory which are utilized in an analysis of selected empirical data, which consists of Coca-Cola and Pepsi advertisements from the 1950s-1980s as well as other secondary data including cultural perspectives and other significant marketing campaigns by the two companies in the same time period. To assist and to create structure in the findings relating to the problem statement, two research question are presented: “Which semiotic differences are there between Coca-Cola and Pepsi’s eight selected advertisements?” “Why has emotional branding been so important to Coca-Cola and in which ways is it contributing to the company’s success in the scope of the 1950s-1980s?” The findings for the first research question are as follows.
    [Show full text]
  • Presentation Slides from the November 14, 2019 Community
    WELCOME DOUG JACKSON VIRGINIA DEPARTMENT OF HOUSING & COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT TODAY WE’LL Explore how NRV Community Health Assessment findings relate to your work. Learn how other communities are making strategic investments to address identified needs Contribute ideas, experiences, and energy to improve health and well being in the NRV. WELCOME + INTRODUCTION BILL FLATTERY CARILION CLINIC WELCOME + INTRODUCTION STEPHEN CHANDLER LEWIS GALE COMMUNITY HEALTH ASSESSMENT ASHLEY HASH CARILION NEW RIVER VALLEY MEDICAL CENTER COMMUNITY HEALTH ASSESSMENT MICHELLE BRAUNS COMMUNITY HEALTH CENTER OF THE NEW RIVER VALLEY SYSTEMS AT WORK DOUG JACKSON VA DHCD SYSTEMS AT WORK TAKEAWAYS SYSTEMS AT WORK JESSICA WIRGAU COMMUNITY FOUNDATION OF THE NEW RIVER VALLEY SYSTEMS AT WORK DOUG JACKSON VA DHCD SYSTEMS AT WORK TAKEAWAYS WEIGHING IN BY MOVING ABOUT WEIGHING IN BY MOVING ABOUT 1 Which of the CHA priorities do you perceive to be the greatest barrier for your clients/citizens? GREATEST BARRIER A. Access to Care B. Affordable, Safe Housing C. Child Abuse / Domestic Violence D. Culture: Healthy behaviors not a priority E. Lack of knowledge of resources F. Poverty / low avg. household income G. Substance Use H. Transportation WEIGHING IN BY MOVING ABOUT 2 If we could address one priority area, which one do you think would have the greatest impact on our region? GREATEST IMPACT A. Access to Care B. Affordable, Safe Housing C. Child Abuse / Domestic Violence D. Culture: Healthy behaviors not a priority E. Lack of knowledge of resources F. Poverty / low avg. household income G. Substance Use H. Transportation WEIGHING IN BY MOVING ABOUT 3 Which priority do you think there is the greatest energy to work on? GREATEST ENERGY A.
    [Show full text]
  • Coke Vs. Pepsi: the Cola Wars in South Africa During the Anti- Apartheid Era
    Georgia State University ScholarWorks @ Georgia State University History Theses Department of History 7-8-2009 Coke vs. Pepsi: The Cola Wars in South Africa during The Anti- Apartheid Era John Kirby Spivey Follow this and additional works at: https://scholarworks.gsu.edu/history_theses Part of the History Commons Recommended Citation Spivey, John Kirby, "Coke vs. Pepsi: The Cola Wars in South Africa during The Anti-Apartheid Era." Thesis, Georgia State University, 2009. https://scholarworks.gsu.edu/history_theses/35 This Thesis is brought to you for free and open access by the Department of History at ScholarWorks @ Georgia State University. It has been accepted for inclusion in History Theses by an authorized administrator of ScholarWorks @ Georgia State University. For more information, please contact [email protected]. COKE VS. PEPSI: THE COLA WARS IN SOUTH AFRICA DURING THE ANTI- APARTHEID ERA by J. KIRBY SPIVEY Under the Direction of Dr. Jared Poley ABSTRACT This thesis looks at the actions of Coca-Cola and Pepsi in South Africa during both the anti- apartheid movement and the post-apartheid era. The processes which led to those actions, both corporations’ removal of their presence in South Africa, the effects this had on South Africa, and their reemergence in a post-apartheid state are examined. It will be shown that, despite the public relations campaigns of both Coke and Pepsi, far more importance was placed on their products’ profitability than the well-being of the black Africans who produced, delivered, or consumed the soft drinks. However, both companies found their actions during the 1980s to affect their success after the fall of apartheid.
    [Show full text]
  • Nikolina Šimetin Šegvić COKE VS. PEPSI: IZAZOV PODUZETNIČKOJ
    Nikolina Šimetin Šegvić povijest COKE VS. PEPSI: IZAZOV PODUZETNIČKOJ POVIJESTI Autorica istražuje poduzetničku povijesti dviju najpoznatijih i najuspješnijih tvrtki koje proizvode gazirane napitke, Ključne riječi: tzv. cole. Počevši od samog osnutka tih firma u 19. stoljeću, autorica detaljno analizira pojedina razdoblja, pogotovo poduzetnička s obzirom na marketinške strategije koje su uvelike utjecale na popularnosti i prodaju Coca-Cole i Pepsi Cole. povijest, Dajući poduzetničkim i marketinškim strategijama određeni povijesno-politički i kulturno-historijiski kontekst, marketing, pregled paralelnih kronika konkurentskih poduzeća zalazi i u posljednje desetljeće novog stoljeća. Pritom gazirana pića, nije samo obrađena poslovna statistika i građa u literaturi koja postoji na tu temu, već su i neki ključni trenuci Coca-Cola, poduzetničke povijesti Coca-Cole i Pepsi Cole popraćeni u američkim medijima, kao što je Time. Pepsi Cola, zarada, uprava, prodaja Povijest poduzetništva ili razvoj poslovnog upravljanja prema N. S. B. Grasu može se proučavati kroz povijest kreiranja poslovne politike ili kroz povijest upravljanja poslovnim resursima.1 Za potrebe ovog rada, detaljniji će osvrt biti u okvirima uprav- ljanja poslovnim resursima. Gras dalje navodi kako se upravljanje poslovnim resursima sastoji od povijesti proizvodnje, marketinga i privatnih financija, a metoda kojom se dolazi do toga je studija pojedinačnih fenomena (eng. case study), preko koje je moguće formuliranje općih ideja.2 Case study ovog rada je razdoblje tzv. Cola Wars, fenomena prvenstveno u marketingu između Coca-Cola Company i PepsiCo, koji je svoj vrhunac doživio u osamdesetim godinama 20. stoljeća. Analizom marketinških kampanja ovih dviju kompanija od sredine 20. stoljeća do sredine 1980-ih godina nastojat će se prikazati jedan segment njihove tržišne politike, koji se prvenstveno temeljio na plasiranju Coca-Cole i Pepsi-Cole, dakle dvaju brandova (marki) navedenih kompanija.
    [Show full text]
  • Information to Users
    INFORMATION TO USERS While the most advanced technology has been used to photograph and reproduce this manuscript, the quality of the reproduction is heavily dependent upon the quality of the material submitted. For example: • Manuscript pages may have indistinct print. In such cases, the best available copy has been filmed. • Manuscripts may not always be complete. In such cases, a note will indicate that it is not possible to obtain missing pages. • Copyrighted material may have been removed from the manuscript. In such cases, a note will indicate the deletion. Oversize materials (e.g., maps, drawings, and charts) are photographed by sectioning the original, beginning at the upper left-hand comer and continuing from left to right in equal sections with small overlaps. Each oversize page is also filmed as one exposure and is available, for an additional charge, as a standard 35mm slide or as a 17”x 23” black and white photographic print. Most photographs reproduce acceptably on positive microfilm or microfiche but lack the clarity on xerographic copies made from the microfilm. For an additional charge, 35mm slides ofG”x 9” black and white photographic prints are available for any photographs or illustrations that cannot be reproduced satisfactorily by xerography. 8710054 Stegman, John Davis A RHETORICAL INVESTIGATION OF SELECTED 1982 CORPORATE ANNUAL REPORTS The Ohio State University Ph.D. 1987 University >■ Microfilms International300 N. Zeeb Road, Ann Arbor, Ml 48106 PLEASE NOTE: In all cases this material has been filmed in the best possible way from the available copy. Problems encountered with this docum ent have been identified here with a check mark V .
    [Show full text]
  • Trademarks As Language in the Pepsi Generation Rochelle Cooper Dreyfuss
    Notre Dame Law Review Volume 65 | Issue 3 Article 1 May 2014 Expressive Genericity: Trademarks as Language in the Pepsi Generation Rochelle Cooper Dreyfuss Follow this and additional works at: http://scholarship.law.nd.edu/ndlr Part of the Law Commons Recommended Citation Rochelle C. Dreyfuss, Expressive Genericity: Trademarks as Language in the Pepsi Generation, 65 Notre Dame L. Rev. 397 (1990). Available at: http://scholarship.law.nd.edu/ndlr/vol65/iss3/1 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by NDLScholarship. It has been accepted for inclusion in Notre Dame Law Review by an authorized administrator of NDLScholarship. For more information, please contact [email protected]. Expressive Genericity: Trademarks as Language In the Pepsi Generation Rochelle Cooper Dreyfuss* The Mets are one offour major league baseball teams that boast their own cloth- ing store. - Gerald Eskenazi, noting that the Angels, Red Sox and Pi- rates are about to join the Mets, Padres, Brewers and A's in running such enterprises' When I campaign alone I'm approachable. Women talk to me, complain, but when I'm with Ted I'm a Barbie doll. - Marcia Chellis,2 quotingJoan Ken- nedy's account of her life with Edward Kennedy. What does all this consolidatingmean for publishing? The birth of McBooks. Sheldon Himelfarb, reporting the effect of "McEficiency" and "McMarket research" on the publishing business3 after Random House purchased the Crown Publishing Group. 'Star War' Funds4 Cut in the Senate -Headline, New York Times, Septem- ber 27, 1989. Their concern was how to pretend they had never left home.
    [Show full text]
  • Pepsi Controversial Kendall Jenner Advertisement Turns to Racism
    The Impact of Crisis Situation and Communication Strategies: Pepsi Controversial Kendall Jenner Advertisement Turns to Racism Arnez Dikayani Saqina1, Kadek Maretta Putri Ambarini2 1President University, Jababeka Education Park, Indonesia 17550 2President University, Jababeka Education Park, Indonesia 17550 E-mail: [email protected] , [email protected] Abstract This research study examined how Pepsi advertisement affects public perspective toward racism issues and what kind of strategies that Pepsi implement to overcome the crisis. Crises, in almost all circumstances, immediately trigger a deluge of questions from an organization's many different publics. Crisis can have a negative effect on brand image. Crisis communication experts are employed to save an organization's reputation against various threats and unwanted challenges. Crisis communication is an initiative which aims at protecting the reputation of the organization and maintaining its public image. Benoit's (1995, 1997) image repair strategies serve as the model for the foundational research study that analyzed Pepsi's image repair strategies following the controversial advertisement featuring Kendall Jenner that considered as discrimination and racism issue in 2017. In this journal, the researchers gather the data by using library research and case studies method. Based on image restoration theory, we conclude that the crisis response provided by Pepsi was using the mortification strategy, which is they admit their mistake and beg forgiveness by conveying apologies through social media, and delete the advertisement immediately. Keywords: crisis communication, advertising, racism Abstrak Penelitian ini dibuat dengan tujuan untuk menguji bagaimana iklan Pepsi dapat mempengaruhi perspektif publik terhadap masalah rasisme dan juga strategi apa yang diterapkan Pepsi dalam mengatasi krisis.
    [Show full text]
  • The New Collaborative Cinema: Fan Labor in Contemporary Film Franchises
    The New Collaborative Cinema: Fan Labor in Contemporary Film Franchises A thesis presented to the faculty of the College of Fine Arts of Ohio University In partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree Master of Arts Natallia Yeloshyna April 2021 © 2021 Natallia Yeloshyna. All Rights Reserved. 2 This thesis titled The New Collaborative Cinema: Fan Labor in Contemporary Film Franchises by NATALLIA YELOSHYNA has been approved for the Film Division and the College of Fine Arts by Ofer Eliaz Associate Professor of Film Matthew R. Shaftel Dean, College of Fine Arts 3 Abstract YELOSHYNA, NATALLIA, M.A., April 2021, Film Studies The New Collaborative Cinema: Fan Labor in Contemporary Film Franchises Director of Thesis: Ofer Eliaz This paper reviews recent attempts of contemporary media franchises to include fan labor in the development of commercial entertainment cinema. By examining Star Wars, Lord of the Rings, Fifty Shades and the Wizarding World franchises, I argue that socially and historically unique characteristics of contemporary Western culture allow contemporary franchises to encourage and reinforce audience involvement into franchise development. In particular, the Fantastic Beasts film series resets hierarchical relationships between the creators of J.K. Rowling’s franchise and the imput of its fans. This makes the film Fantastic Beasts: The Crimes of Grindelwald the most progressive example of a producer-consumer relationship in contemporary cinema. This paper provides an overview of strategies of producer-consumer communication in fantasy film franchises that can help film theorists to better understand the specifics of the contemporary media environment and filmmakers to avoid mistakes in communications with their fans.
    [Show full text]