The Dissidents
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Load more
Recommended publications
-
Unconscionable and Unconstitutional: Bill C-8'S Attempt to Dictate Choices Concerning Sexuality and Gender
Unconscionable and Unconstitutional Bill C-8’s Attempt to Dictate Choices Concerning Sexuality and Gender May 12, 2020 Marty Moore, JD, and Jocelyn Gerke, BComm, MPP, JD (Student-at-Law) Mail: #253, 7620 Elbow Drive SW, Calgary, AB • T2V 1K2 Web: www.jccf.ca • Email: [email protected] • Phone: (403) 475-3622 CRA registered charity number 81717 4865 RR0001 CONTENTS Executive Summary ...................................................................................................................... 1 I. Bill C-8: An Act to Amend the Criminal Code (conversion therapy) .................................. 2 A. An overly broad definition of “conversion therapy” .............................................................. 2 B. Bill C-8 restricts children’s and adults’ access to care.......................................................... 3 C. Bill C-8 imposes an ideological view of sexuality and gender ............................................... 5 II. Bill C-8 Restricts Health Professionals’ Ability to Treat Children’s Gender Distress without Transition and Medicalization ....................................................................................... 7 A. Bill C-8’s imposition of a single treatment path for children ................................................. 7 B. Violation of practitioners’ and patients’ freedom of thought, opinion, belief and expression 9 C. Political interference with medical and scientific debate limits healthcare options .............. 9 III. Bill C-8’s Violation of the Charter Rights of Children and Parents -
Transgender Health at the Crossroads: Legal Norms, Insurance Markets, and the Threat of Healthcare Reform
Yale Journal of Health Policy, Law, and Ethics Volume 11 Issue 2 Yale Journal of Health Policy, Law, and Article 4 Ethics 2011 Transgender Health at the Crossroads: Legal Norms, Insurance Markets, and the Threat of Healthcare Reform Liza Khan Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.law.yale.edu/yjhple Part of the Health Law and Policy Commons, and the Legal Ethics and Professional Responsibility Commons Recommended Citation Liza Khan, Transgender Health at the Crossroads: Legal Norms, Insurance Markets, and the Threat of Healthcare Reform, 11 YALE J. HEALTH POL'Y L. & ETHICS (2011). Available at: https://digitalcommons.law.yale.edu/yjhple/vol11/iss2/4 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by Yale Law School Legal Scholarship Repository. It has been accepted for inclusion in Yale Journal of Health Policy, Law, and Ethics by an authorized editor of Yale Law School Legal Scholarship Repository. For more information, please contact [email protected]. Khan: Transgender Health at the Crossroads NOTE Transgender Health at the Crossroads: Legal Norms, Insurance Markets, and the Threat of Healthcare Reform Liza Khan INTRODUCTION ........................................................................................... 376 I. MEDICALIZED IDENTITY ...................................................................... 379 A. TRANSGENDER HEALTHCARE ..................................... 380 B. TRANSGENDER LAW AND MEDICINE: INTERSECTION OR DISCONNECT?.. 382 C. NEGOTIATING THE MEDICAL CONSTRUCTION OF GENDER: -
The Paradox of Authenticity: the Depoliticization of Trans Identity
The Paradox of Authenticity: The Depoliticization of Trans Identity THESIS Presented in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree Master of Arts in the Graduate School of The Ohio State University By Meredith Cecilia Lee Graduate Program in Women's Studies The Ohio State University 2012 Master's Examination Committee: Professor Shannon Winnubst, Advisor Professor Mary Thomas Professor Jian Chen Copyright by Meredith Cecilia Lee 2012 Abstract The language of authenticity that valorizes the mind over the body is embedded in Cartesian dualism, which thereby inspires an entirely personal understanding of self- fulfillment. Within the trans community, this language depoliticizes trans issues by framing nonnormative gender presentation as a personal issue. This paper examines the relationship of Cartesian dualism to the paradoxes of authenticity in trans medico- scientific discourse. For example, to express authenticity and gain social recognition within the medical model of trans identity, an individual must articulate her/his desire within the normative language of the medical establishment; therefore, the quest for authenticity is already foreclosed through the structures of normalization. This paper argues that, while medical procedures typically normalize one’s body to “pass” as the other sex, these procedures are also necessary for many trans individuals to gain social recognition and live a bearable life. The notion that trans individuals are “trapped” in the wrong body has been the dominant paradigm since at least the 1950s. This paper argues that centering gender in the body constructs gender as ahistorical and thereby erases the political, economic, and cultural significance of trans oppression and struggle. This paper concludes that the systematic pathologization of nonnormative sex/gender identification has historically constituted the notion that gender trouble is indeed a personal problem that should be cured through medical science. -
Debating DSM 5 Zowie Davy Phd, Senior Lecturer in C
Commentary on the construction of Gender Dysphoria at Classifying Sex: Debating DSM 5 Zowie Davy PhD, Senior Lecturer in Community Care, University of Lincoln, UK. Context to the commentary On the American Psychiatric Association’s (APA) website the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, Fifth Edition (DSM‐5), is promoted as the “most comprehensive, current, and critical resource for clinical practice available to today's mental health clinicians and researchers of all orientations” (American Psychiatric Association, 2012a). The manual is ‘comprehensive,’ indeed; it has grown in size since its first edition to over 900 pages in its current DSM 5 incarnation. We could argue as Farley, the former president of the American Psychological Association, does that the DSM authors are contributing to an increase in “the relentless production of disorders and pathologizing of normal extremes” (Gornall, 2013: no page no.) and the facilitating of mental illnesses. In response to the publication of the DSM‐5, a two‐day conference at the University of Cambridge took place: Classifying Sex: Debating DSM‐5, at which discussants debated the potential impact of the manual’s criteria for pathological, paraphilic and by default ‘normal’ sexualities, gender identities, and psychiatric practice. The delegates considered amongst many other topics the role of power and evidence, at least that is how I understood many of the contributions to the debate. The panel that I was invited to contribute to featured Kenneth Zucker (Chair of the Sexual and Gender Identity Disorders workgroup of DSM‐5) to whom I was to critically respond. In this reflective commentary I would like to focus on power and evidence because Zucker has previously described the DSM’s international influence as spreading from clinical care, clinical training to clinical research (Zucker, 2010b). -
Agenda Regular Meeting # 2021-02 Kingston Frontenac Public Library Board Wednesday, February 17, 2021 – 4:30 PM Virtual Meeting - Webex
Agenda Regular Meeting # 2021-02 Kingston Frontenac Public Library Board Wednesday, February 17, 2021 – 4:30 PM Virtual Meeting - WebEx She:kon, Aanii, Boozhoo, Waychaya, Kwey Kwey, Tawnshi. Let us bring our good minds and hearts together, to honour and celebrate these traditional lands as a gathering place of the Original Peoples and their Ancestors who were entrusted to care for Mother Earth since time immemorial. It is with deep humility, that we acknowledge and offer our gratitude for their contributions to this community, having respect for all as we share this space now and walk side-by-side into the future. 1. Call to Order / Regrets 2. Adoption of the Agenda (motion) 3. Disclosure of Conflict of Interest 4. Presentation: Friends of the Kingston Frontenac Public Library (FOL) to provide an update on their highlights and accomplishments over the past year 5. Delegation: Calvin Neufeld to address the Board in regards to KFPL’s decision to retain Irreversible Damage in the collection. (correspondence 7.1.1. and 7.1.2., agenda item 12.1.1.) Consent Agenda 6. Adoption of Minutes 6.1. Regular KFPL Board Meeting #2021-01 of January 20, 2021 (attached) 6.2. Committee of the Whole Meeting #2021-01 of February 3, 2021 (attached) 7. Information Items 7.1. Correspondence/Information Received and Sent 7.1.1. From Franceen Neufeld, an email dated January 28, 2021 requesting an appeal of the decision to retain Irreversible Damage in the Library’s collection. 7.1.2. From Franceen Neufeld, an email dated February 2, 2021, regarding correspondence item 7.1.1. -
The Transgender Tipping Point: It Is Not the Transperson Who Is Disordered but the Society in Which S/He Lives1 by Joelle Ruby Ryan, Ph.D
The Transgender Tipping Point: It is Not the Transperson Who is Disordered but the Society in which S/he Lives1 By Joelle Ruby Ryan, Ph.D. Candidate, Bowling Green State University Presented at the International Foundation for Gender Education Conference (IFGE-2009): Alexandria, Virginia: February 6, 2009 [This paper is in preparation for publication. V: 2-20-09 I am seeking peer commentary prior to publication. Kindly email feedback to [email protected] ] In sociology, a tipping point, or angle of repose, is when a previously rare phenomenon becomes speedily, considerably and vividly more common. In this paper, it is my assertion that the previously rare phenomenon which has materialized into extensive and exciting commonality is the emergence of multiple forms of transgender advocacy: grass-roots activism, political lobbying, emancipatory internet and print publishing, and speaking truth to power. In his influential 2000 book The Tipping Point: How Little Things Can Make a Big Difference,2 Malcolm Gladwell describes the tipping point as the moment of critical mass, the threshold, the boiling point. 3 Gladwell also writes: The possibility of sudden change is at the center of the idea of the Tipping Point and might well be the hardest of all to accept. 4 Since the early to mid 1990s, there has been a formidable and unstoppable wave of committed, militant and subversive transgender activism. Here in 2009, I truly believe we are rapidly approaching a revolutionary threshold from which no malevolent entity can force us backwards. However, in order to reach a veritable tipping point, it will require continued vigilance, action, perseverance and existential courage. -
Gender and Sexuality, 8(3), 269-302
Annual Review of THE GOVERNANCE OF GENDER Critical Psychology 11, 2014 NON-CONFORMING CHILDREN: A DANGEROUS ENCLOSURE Gender Jake Pyne Jake Pyne and McMasterMcMaster SchoolSchool ofof Social Social Work, Work, HamiltonToronto, ,Canada Canada Sexuality Abstract Since the 1960’s, children who fail to conform to expected gender roles (gender non-conforming children) have been the recipients of trou- ! bling psychological treatments designed to bring their gender expres- sion in line with social norms. Proponents of these programs deem them necessary to alleviate children’s “distress” and “discomfort” while critics charge clinicians with doing harm to children through a repre- hensible practice. In this paper, I apply Foucauldian theories of power to the work of two clinicians (George Rekers and Kenneth Zucker) to explore how families with gender non-conforming children are gov- erned in corrective treatment programs. While it is frequently noted that gender non-conforming children face rejection and exclusion, I argue for consideration of corrective treatment programs as a calcu- lated and dangerous form of inclusion – an ensemble of disciplinary techniques drawing these children and their families into an enclosure of dangerous power relations. I propose that these treatments are re- fective of the historical shift in the exercise of power in modern liberal democracies whereby populations are increasingly governed through expert knowledge, the administration of shame and the exploitation of the desire for success and normality. I outline a politic of response based on Butler’s concept of intelligibility and the goal of doing justice to someone. Keywords: gender non-conforming; transgender; children; gen- der identity disorder; psychiatry. -
Contemporary Institutional and Popular Frameworks for Gender Variance
Georgia State University ScholarWorks @ Georgia State University Anthropology Theses Department of Anthropology 4-21-2010 "They Need Labels": Contemporary Institutional and Popular Frameworks for Gender Variance Ophelia Bradley Georgia State University Follow this and additional works at: https://scholarworks.gsu.edu/anthro_theses Recommended Citation Bradley, Ophelia, ""They Need Labels": Contemporary Institutional and Popular Frameworks for Gender Variance." Thesis, Georgia State University, 2010. https://scholarworks.gsu.edu/anthro_theses/35 This Thesis is brought to you for free and open access by the Department of Anthropology at ScholarWorks @ Georgia State University. It has been accepted for inclusion in Anthropology Theses by an authorized administrator of ScholarWorks @ Georgia State University. For more information, please contact [email protected]. “THEY NEED LABELS”: CONTEMPORARY INSTITUTIONAL AND POPULAR FRAMEWORKS FOR GENDER VARIANCE by OPHELIA D. BRADLEY Under the Direction of Dr. Jennifer Patico ABSTRACT This study addresses the complex issues of etiology and conceptualization of gender variance in the modern West. By analyzing medical, psychological, and popular approaches to gender variance, I demonstrate the highly political nature of each of these paradigms and how gender variant individuals engage with these discourses in the elaboration of their own gender identities. I focus on the role of institutional authority in shaping popular ideas about gender variance and the relationship of gender variant individuals who seek medical intervention towards the systems that regulate their care. Also relevant are the tensions between those who view gender variance as an expression of an essential cross-sex gender (as in traditional transsexual narrative) and those who believe that gender is socially constructed and non-binary. -
The Tavistock's Experiment with Puberty Blockers* Michael Biggs
The Tavistock’s Experiment with Puberty Blockers* Michael Biggs Department of Sociology and St Cross College, University of Oxford (version 1.0.1, 29 July 2019) In 1994 a 16-year-old girl who wished to be a boy, known to us as B, entered the Amsterdam Gender Clinic. She was unique for having her sexual development halted at the age of 13, after an adventurous paediatric endocrinologist gave her a Gonadotropin-Releasing Hormone agonist (GnRHa). Originally developed to treat prostate cancer, these drugs are also used to delay puberty when it develops abnormally early: in girls younger than 8, and boys younger than 9. The endocrinologist’s innovation was to use the drug to stop normal puberty altogether, in order to prevent the development of unwanted secondary sexual characteristics—with the aim of administering cross-sex hormones in later adolescence. Dutch clinicians used B’s case to create a new protocol for transgendering children, which enabled physical intervention at an age far below the normal age of consent (Cohen-Kettenis and Goozen 1998). The Dutch protocol promised to create a more passable simulacrum of the opposite sex than could be achieved by physical intervention in adulthood. It was therefore embraced by trans-identified children and their parents, by older transgender activists, and by some clinicians specializing in gender dysphoria. The Gender Identity Development Service (GIDS), part of the Tavistock and Portman NHS Foundation Trust, treats children with gender dysphoria from England, Wales, and Northern Ireland. It launched an experimental study of “puberty blockers”—the more friendly term for GnRHa when administered to children with gender dysphoria—in 2011. -
External Review of the Gender Identity Clinic of the Child, Youth and Family Services in the Underserved Populations Program At
TransAdvocate.com External Review of the Gender Identity Clinic of the Child, Youth and Family Services in the Underserved Populations Program at the Centre for Addiction and Mental Health November 26, 2015 Certain redactions were made to protect the privacy of individuals, and legal advice provided as part of the process (Appendix 10) #DiscoSexology TransAdvocate.com EXTERNAL REVIEW OF THE GENDER IDENTITY CLINIC OF THE CHILD, YOUTH & FAMILY SERVICES IN THE UNDERSERVED POPULATIONS PROGRAM AT THE CENTRE FOR ADDICTION & MENTAL HEALTH November 26, 2015 I) OVERVIEW The Gender Identity Clinic (GIC) of the Child Youth and Family Services (CYF) in the Underserved Population Program (UPP) at CAMH has been longstanding, for approximately 30 years. Engaging in clinical, academic and research activities, the GIC is recognized as one of the few clinics of its kind in Canada and internationally. Given its unique nature, it has not previously been reviewed. In 2014, a well-established community based group, the Rainbow Health Alliance, presented to CAMH a review of the literature and practices in this field with a particular focus on children and youth. Concerns were raised that the GIC may not reflect emerging and accepted practices, particularly for younger children presenting with gender dysphoria and related issues. This community group also raised concerns that the model of the clinic may not conform to emerging human rights legislation, specifically with respect to children and youth who present with gender variance. In the context of these concerns, and recognizing that reviews assist us in ensuring practice reflects the current evidence base, the leadership of UPP agreed that it was now prudent to: 1) Assemble an independent review of the clinical pathways associated with the clinic, 2) Review the literature on best practices and clinical guidelines with this population 3) Assess the extent to which the workings of the GIC were in accordance with those guidelines as well as national and international practice. -
Transgender “Transition” Procedures Performed on Minors Answers to Questions and Information for Joint Interim Committee
TRANSGENDER “TRANSITION” PROCEDURES PERFORMED ON MINORS ANSWERS TO QUESTIONS AND INFORMATION FOR JOINT INTERIM COMMITTEE Submitted by Rep. Rex P. Shipp June 10, 2021 Part I - Evaluating the scope of the challenge 1. What is biological sex dysphoria? Biological sex dysphoria is the feeling of discomfort or distress that might occur in people whose gender identity differs from their biological sex or sex-related physical characteristics. “The medical diagnosis is gender dysphoria. A biological male feeling and believing himself to be a girl and the distress that accompanies these feelings and beliefs is an example of gender dysphoria (previously known as gender identity disorder). There are billions of neurons that make the brain. Neurons are very specialized cells that transmit and store information. The control center, if you will, of every cell in the body is the nucleus, which contains DNA. The DNA is wound up into specialized units called chromosomes. There are 46 chromosomes in every human cell. Two of these are specialized chromosomes called sex chromosomes. Assuming normal development, females have two X chromosomes, and males have one X and one Y chromosome. These sex chromosomes are present in every cell in the body. They remain in the cells from conception until death and do not change.” Michael K. Laidlaw, M.D. Historically, biological sex dysphoria primarily affected a very small percentage of biologically male children who were first diagnosed at a very young age (generally, under the age of five). More recently, however, a growing number of pre-teen and early teen females (primarily) are experiencing what has come to be called Rapid Onset Gender Dysphoria (ROGD). -
Bodies and Bureaucracy: Legal Sex Classification and Marriage-Based Immigration for Trans* People
05-Tomchin (Do Not Delete) 6/5/2013 11:41 PM Bodies and Bureaucracy: Legal Sex Classification and Marriage-Based Immigration for Trans* People Olga Tomchin† In most jurisdictions in the United States, a birth certificate’s sex marker, as decided by the appearance of the infant’s genitals, creates a rebuttable presumption of legal sex requiring specified (but widely varying) evidence to overcome. These requirements for recognition are generally illogical, inconsistent, and unattainable for most trans* people. As a result, the majority of trans* people end up with conflicting sex markers on their identity documents. This regime of a legal sex designated at birth directly harms the most vulnerable and unfairly distributes life chances. The current U.S. rules governing marriage-based immigration for trans* people provide a valuable case study of the inadequacy of the predominant approach to sex classification in the United States. This is particularly true when viewing the many other harms that trans* people (and queer cisgender people) experience partly as a result of legal sex categorization and regulation. The major shortcomings of the U.S. rules governing marriage-based immigration for trans* people demonstrate that the only solution is the total elimination of “sex” as a legal category. Copyright © 2013 California Law Review, Inc. California Law Review, Inc. (CLR) is a California nonprofit corporation. CLR and the authors are solely responsible for the content of their publications. † Soros Justice Fellow at Transgender Law Center; J.D., University of California, Berkeley, School of Law, 2013. Thank you to Professor Kate Jastram, Professor Anne Tamar-Mattis, Matt Wood, my Global Migration Issues Writing Seminar classmates, and the California Law Review editors for editing and encouragement.