DOCSLIB.ORG

Schools in Australia Are No Longer Child-Friendly Places. the Removal

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Schools in Australia Are No Longer Child-Friendly Places. the Removal To : Senate Committee of Inquiry. The effectiveness of the National Assessment Program – Literacy & Numeracy. This submission recommends that NAPLAN testing be banished forthwith; that any ruinous substitute never ever be inflicted on the school children of this country again; and that the focus of public discussion be directed to LEARNING IN THE CLASSROOM and the impact that outside influences have on classroom activities. It has not paid its way. It is impairing educational progress. Schools in Australia are no longer child-friendly places. The removal of play and creativity and love of learning and of the exciting personalised challenge of learning has led to disenchantment with the teaching profession, mistrust of school programs, a fixation with cold testing and a startling increase in bullying. The ideals of compulsory schooling through commitment to the pupilling processes and its healthy teaching/learning contract have been removed, replaced by politically coercive tactics. Worst of all, it removes a child’s natural love of learning and the fun that can provide them with fair-dinkum, intrinsic motivation to achieve as much as possible. LEARNING in context is difficult to comprehend in its entirety, especially when applied to classroom activities. Productive learning as a classroom activity can be mystifying. Observers know that productive learning is going on, but the processes often defy description. A magic classroom is almost impossible to describe. There are so many different learning- focussed exchanges. Since 2008, the prevailing political control of measurement in Australian schools has dominated classroom outcomes to the detriment of useful learning progress. A halt to Standardised Blanket Testing needs to be called as soon as possible. Parents and an interested pubic need to talk about ‘Learning’ in a positive, healthy, politically-free manner. Immediately below is a table of differences between a Joel Klein/NAPLAN testing system, now controlling Australian education, and that of a future system that emphasises learning. This submission suggests that a blue-ribbon, superior education system is possible once the public is given the opportunity to talk about the way we treat our children when they go to school; especially to talk openly about the impact that politically controlled Standardised Blanket Testing can have on classroom routines. Q & A Here is a short Q & A concerning critical issues of present-day schooling. [Questions, on the ABC Monday’s show ‘Q&A’, about NAPLAN are barred, by the way, without explanation. See below.] Q. WHY is it that countries, like Finland, represented on the right-hand side of this table, lead the PISA test results of 70 countries, even though its tested cohort has up to four years less at school by 15 years of age than do those countries, like Australia....and Finnish educators do not approve of Standardised Blanket Testing regimes? Finland concentrates on how to learn about learning; Australia about testing. A. SEE the table above. The answer is SO obvious. When pupils are treated with respect - as ‘pupils’ [rather than as over-testucated frightened ‘students’] with total recognition of their individual differences, their personal attitudes to learning, their natural desire to take their developed learnings to the dizziest of heights - there are no limits to their learnacy [learning HOW to learn] outcomes. NAPLAN and other forms of national testing ruthlessly applied by political appointees, ‘whose knowledge of learning in the classroom can be written on a used postage stamp in large font ‘ according to a former principal [JH], merely standardise learning and teaching; and curb development of each child, each system, each country. Our elected servants have become our masters and there are too many of them who seem to take delight in disrespecting the efforts of our beautiful children and devaluing the tasks of our teaching profession, who love our kids and just want to be able to do the best that they can by them.They have a lot to answer for if NAPLAN persists. Democratic principles have been suppressed by corporate saboteurs in the quest for the mighty dollar. NAPLAN has to be totally destroyed , without modification or substitution. It is a national threat. The interlocked connection between the administrative operations of NAPLAN testing and mega-business should be enough to call a halt and examine the connection. Q. WHY is Australia regarded as the most GERM ridden country, so crazed about testing? A. Excessive federal political control of each state’s education systems, linked to unseemly threats and totalitarian tactics as well as a curious attachment to the mega-rich testing tycoons’ greed for more money have a lot to do with it. Who is to know how the extensive lobby-groups employed by Klein’s ‘Amplify’ and by the UK’s Pearson group of companies perform their duties? [“Why would someone with any conscience think it is okay to degrade the art of teaching in exchange for profit, while denying the love of learning for an entire generation. Sounds like science fiction, doesn’t it? “ BHM] Q. Isn’t NAPLAN useful as a diagnostic tool? A. About as useful as ‘lips on a chicken’. How in the world can results, provided five months after the tests, when the learners are in circumstances far different from the circumstances at the time of testing, be of any help? Fair go! Can it be better that DIY tests on the spot? Can it be better than face-to-face evaluation of effort? Try the other leg. If testucators need assistance to see how well they are going and have to rely on external assistance, there are plenty of sources. A.C.E.R. is a one-stop shop. There’s ‘Google’ to find other providers. There’s books. [As a test-fixated principal, my copy of Sir Fred Schonell’s “Diagnostic and Attainment Testing” became dog-eared and tattered and fell apart from over-use. If only I’d thought about what I was doing. I could have sold it to another foolish testucator in pristine condition.] NAPLAN is a useless, dangerous, frighteningly dark weapon that seriously threatens our country’s future in intellectual, creative, health and fiscal terms. Financially, it represents an enormous waste of tax-payers’ money that can be better used. The danger MUST be totally removed from the schooling landscape before May, 2014. Let’s rescue the unfortunate children presently in Years 2, 4, 6, 8 from assaults on their learning capacity. Let our kids LEARN, for heaven’s sake. More questions are asked on the following clip demonstrating the concern of NY parents enduring the same conditions as Aussie parents. I realise that the clip may not be reproduced on the senate report, but it is essential viewing for anyone who is concerned about their children and able to view it: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=HCfXYwaZBYw&feature=player_embedded o0o0o0o0o0o0o0o0o0o0o0o0o0o0o0o0o0o0o0o0o0o0o0o0o0o0o00o0o0o0o0o0o0o0o0o0o0o0o0o0o0o0o0o0o0o0o0o0o0o0o Paradigms of social behaviour, such as Maslow’s Hierarchy of Needs [1954] and French & Ravens’ Bases of Social Power [1959] are worthy additions to empirical knowledge, that summarise what has been obvious to man for thousands of years: 1. ‘Man’ hates to be pushed around. He/she likes to feel appreciated for each and every ‘public’ effort. ‘Man’ much prefers to be valued for his/her own worth and prefers to be self-actualised. [Maslow] 2. The use of coercion and reward power by super-ordinates on subordinates brings resistance. Their use stifles enthusiasm and initiatives. [French & Raven] Why is the Australian system of schooling in the hands of measurement-crazed dinosaurs who believe that fear motivates children to learn? Why are our legislative representatives too timid to stand up for kids? Why do they need this complicated, costly, time-wasting senate inquiry indeed, [sorry Penny] in the knowledge that mostly testucating sycophantic compliers have the time to respond adequately; and our real educating experts are too busy in the classroom and too frightened? It will require a few million anti-NAPLAN voters to convince the present hard-nosed, measurement-biased regime to cease its NAPLAN antics. Our teachers are too scared or too busy. While the intentions of Senator Penny Wright are most honourable, praiseworthy and laudable [I just love the lady for her honest good intentions], the call for such a ‘snap’ inquiry could have a ‘diminishing effect’ [P. Darwin 21-05-13]. The warm, well-intentioned belief - that those who are most concerned about the effects of SBTs [Standardised Blanket Tests] on teaching and learning in classrooms will have enough to say to persuade those in power to change their minds - is admirable. It’s a long bow to draw to believe that some of the 1,030,00 parents of kids whose private learning behaviour was assaulted on 14,15,16 May and the parents of other victims might comment. If the responses are not up to expectations, the testucators will claim that their notions of schooling have been supported. LEARNING REFORM should become an all-encompassing public discussion by talking about what actually happens INSIDE the classroom. The classroom is where our future is. Let’s talk it. There is plethora of reliable information that clearly demonstrates that GERM-based Standardised Blanket Testing is a major threat to productive learning. Thank God for ‘google’ that can provide a guide to productive thinking at the click of a button. Try : Sir Ken Robinson, Prof. Robin Alexander, Diane Ravitch, Yong Zhau, Kelvin Smythe, Marion Brady, Bruce Hammonds, Allan Alach...an endless list. The evidence is so overwhelming and the literature so profuse. Why isn’t any notice taken? There is certainly no reliable or valid evidence that current measurement techniques create intellectual products of worth. None! Try ‘google’ to find any.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Managing by the Numbers
    Managing by the Numbers Empowerment and Accountability in New York City’s Schools by CLARA HEMPHILL AND KIM NAUER WITH HELEN ZELON, THOMAS JACOBS, ALESSANDRA RAIMONDI, SHARON McCLOSKEY AND RAJEEV YERNENI Center for New York City Affairs Milano the new school for Management and Urban Policy June 2010 Contents 1 Executive Summary 7 Recommendations From the Field The Center for New York City Affairs is dedicated to 10 Principal Power Deconstructed: A History of Reform advancing innovative public policies that strengthen neighborhoods, support families and reduce urban 16 Measuring Progress in the South Bronx poverty. Our tools include rigorous analysis; journalistic 27 Alternate Possibilities: Competing Visions of School Improvement research; candid public dialogue with stakeholders; and 35 A Tale of Two High Schools: Curriculum Matters strategic planning with government officials, nonprofit 40 Local Voices: Where Can Communities Turn? practitioners and community residents. 42 What Makes an “A” School? Grading the Progress Reports 47 Building a Better Yardstick: Making Measures More Consistent Andrew White, Director 48 Beyond Numbers: Where is the Quality in Qualitative Carin Mirowitz, Deputy Director Measurement? Kim Nauer, Education Project Director Clara Hemphill, Senior Editor 49 What’s Wrong With Using State Tests to Measure Progress? Paul Tainsh, Senior Research Associate 50 The Level 4 Paradox: Why Are Fewer Children Scoring at the Top? Kendra Hurley, Associate Editor 51 Principals Without Supervisors: Networks Replace Oversight Anna
    [Show full text]
  • Teacher Attrition and Retention
    THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF NEW YORK HON. GIFFORD MILLER SPEAKER A staff report of the New York City Council Investigation Division on Teacher Attrition and Retention to Members of the Committee on Oversight and Investigations Hon. Eric Gioia, Chair Hon. Tracy Boyland Hon. Miguel Martinez Hon. John C. Liu Hon. Peter Vallone, Jr. New York City Council Investigation Division EXECUTIVE SUMMARY New York City faces a “brain drain” in our City’s schools; a staffing crisis looms on the horizon as New York City public school teachers retire or leave the system at alarming rates. A report by the New York City Council Investigation Division (CID) shows that over 70% of the most experienced NYC public school teachers are likely to retire within the next two years, while more than 25% of mid-career teachers and nearly 30% of newer teachers say it is likely that they will leave the system within the next three years—potentially creating as many as 30,000 vacancies in the City’s classrooms in that time. There are currently over 80,000 teachers in New York City’s public school system.i In NYC, the two-year attrition rate for teachers is 25%, with 18% of teachers leaving in the first year—while the national rate is only ten percent.ii To find out how many teachers are thinking of leaving the school system and possible reasons why, CID investigators, with the assistance of UFT staff members, conducted a telephone survey of 2,781 teachers currently employed by the DOE. Respondents, who were randomly selected, were called during the weeks of April 26 and May 3, 2004.
    [Show full text]
  • Remarks by Rupert Murdoch Accepting the Media Institute's
    Remarks by Rupert Murdoch Accepting The Media Institute’s American Horizon Award October 6, 2010 Thank you for those gracious words, Joel. Many of you know Joel from his days in Washington. Some of you are even reporters. Let me tell you: There are many stories to be written about the miracles Joel has been performing for the New York City school system. This is a man who works day and night for one goal: that every child who enters a New York City public school will leave with a solid education – and a fair shot at the American Dream. So I ask you, please join me in toasting a man for all seasons … Joel Klein. I also want to congratulate Kyle McSlarrow. In his work for National Freedom of Speech Week, Kyle reminds us that the Founders made freedom of the press first for a reason. In his work for cable television, he reminds us why property rights are vital for keeping the press free and independent. So again, let’s give a good man a big thank you. Finally I’d like to acknowledge Meredith Attwell Baker. Commissioner Baker is one of the brightest people to sit on the FCC – and tonight we can see why. It’s refreshing to have in government someone who recognizes that the first protection for a free press is limited government. Meredith, thank you for your wise words – and thank you for your good work. I also want to thank The Media Institute. Every day, you advance three principles essential for a healthy media – freedom … competition … and excellence.
    [Show full text]
  • Pbs Quarterly Program Topic Report
    July 2005 PBS QUARTERLY PROGRAM TOPIC REPORT ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- QPTR Category: Abortion ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- NOLA Code: NOWD 000130C1 Series Title: NOW Distributor: PBS Release Date: 7/29/2005 7:30:00 PM Length: 30 Format: Interview/Discussion/Review; Magazine; News In a controversial reading of the state's statutory rape law, Kansas Attorney General Phill Kline has pushed to mandate reporting of any sexual activity of people under the age of 16 and subpoenaed medical records of abortion patients. Kline maintains he just wants to enforce the law and protect children, but critics charge that he's attacking a woman's right to an abortion and putting more kids at risk. NOW examines Kline's policies, which have made Kansas ground-zero for the reproductive rights debate in America. The report looks at both sides of the issue and at the implications for the nation. ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- QPTR Category: Agriculture ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- NOLA Code: MLNH 008314C1 Series Title: The NewsHour with Jim Lehrer Distributor: PBS Release Date: 7/20/2005 6:00:00 PM Length: 60 Segment: 00:08:55 Format: Interview/Discussion/Review; News Cultivating Controversy: Betty Ann Bowser provides a report on Minnesota farmers' differing opinions on the Central American Free Trade Agreement. -------------------------------------------------------------------------------
    [Show full text]
  • Albert Shanker Institute in Cooperation with the Cte Technical Assistance Center of New York
    UNITED FEDERATION OF TEACHERS & THE ALBERT SHANKER INSTITUTE IN COOPERATION WITH THE CTE TECHNICAL ASSISTANCE CENTER OF NEW YORK Fulfilling The Promise Of a Quality Education for All: st 21 Century Career and Technical Education October 10-11, 2013 New York, NY BIOS OF SPEAKERS Vanda Belusic-Vollor Vanda Belusic-Vollor is Executive Director of the Office of Postsecondary Readiness (OPSR), which leads efforts that ensure all New York City students graduate high school prepared for postsecondary success. These efforts include the Expanded Success Initiative, an educational component of the Office of the Mayor’s Young Men’s Initiative and a pioneering effort to close the achievement gap by significantly increasing the percentage of Black and Latino young men who complete high school prepared to succeed in college and careers. Ms. Belusic-Vollor also leads OPSR’s work to drive rigorous Career and Technical Education school and program pathways aligned to current labor market demands. Previously, she served as Executive Director of the Office of Multiple Pathways to Graduation (OMPG), where she supported the expansion of school and program models to meet the needs of differentiated segments of the over-age, under-credited population. Prior to joining OMPG, Ms. Belusic-Vollor served as the principal of South Brooklyn Community High School, a successful New York City transfer school, which served as the model for transfer schools opened under the leadership of New York City Schools’ Chancellor, Joel Klein. James E. (Gene) Bottoms Gene Bottoms has served as Director of the Southern Regional Education Board's High Schools That Work initiative since 1987.
    [Show full text]
  • Good Chemistry James J
    Columbia College Fall 2012 TODAY Good Chemistry James J. Valentini Transitions from Longtime Professor to Dean of the College your Contents columbia connection. COVER STORY FEATURES The perfect midtown location: 40 The Home • Network with Columbia alumni Front • Attend exciting events and programs Ai-jen Poo ’96 gives domes- • Dine with a client tic workers a voice. • Conduct business meetings BY NATHALIE ALONSO ’08 • Take advantage of overnight rooms and so much more. 28 Stand and Deliver Joel Klein ’67’s extraordi- nary career as an attorney, educator and reformer. BY CHRIS BURRELL 18 Good Chemistry James J. Valentini transitions from longtime professor of chemistry to Dean of the College. Meet him in this Q&A with CCT Editor Alex Sachare ’71. 34 The Open Mind of Richard Heffner ’46 APPLY FOR The venerable PBS host MEMBERSHIP TODAY! provides a forum for guests 15 WEST 43 STREET to examine, question and NEW YORK, NY 10036 disagree. TEL: 212.719.0380 BY THOMAS VIncIGUERRA ’85, in residence at The Princeton Club ’86J, ’90 GSAS of New York www.columbiaclub.org COVER: LESLIE JEAN-BART ’76, ’77J; BACK COVER: COLIN SULLIVAN ’11 WITHIN THE FAMILY DEPARTMENTS ALUMNI NEWS Déjà Vu All Over Again or 49 Message from the CCAA President The Start of Something New? Kyra Tirana Barry ’87 on the successful inaugural summer of alumni- ete Mangurian is the 10th head football coach since there, the methods to achieve that goal. The goal will happen if sponsored internships. I came to Columbia as a freshman in 1967. (Yes, we you do the other things along the way.” were “freshmen” then, not “first-years,” and we even Still, there’s no substitute for the goal, what Mangurian calls 50 Bookshelf wore beanies during Orientation — but that’s a story the “W word.” for another time.) Since then, Columbia has compiled “The bottom line is winning,” he said.
    [Show full text]
  • US Education Reform and National Security
    U.S. Education Reform and National Security and National U.S. Education Reform CFR-sponsored Independent Task Force reports offer analysis and policy prescriptions for major foreign policy issues facing the United States, developed through nonpartisan deliberations that aim to reach consensus. Task Force Members Carole Artigiani Joel I. Klein Global Kids, Inc. News Corporation Craig R. Barrett Wendy Kopp Intel Corporation Teach For America Richard Barth Jeffrey T. Leeds KIPP Foundation Leeds Equity Partners, LLC Edith L. Bartley Julia Levy UNCF Culture Craver Gaston Caperton Michael L. Lomax The College Board UNCF Linda Darling-Hammond Eduardo J. Padrón Stanford University Miami Dade College Jonah M. Edelman Matthew F. Pottinger Stand for Children China Six LLC Roland Fryer Jr. Laurene Powell Jobs Harvard University Emerson Collective Ann M. Fudge Condoleezza Rice Ellen V. Futter Hoover Institution Independent Task Force Report No. 68 American Museum of Natural History Benno C. Schmidt Preston M. Geren Avenues: The World School Sid W. Richardson Foundation Stanley S. Shuman Joel I. Klein and Condoleezza Rice, Chairs Allen & Company LLC Louis V. Gerstner Jr. Julia Levy, Project Director Allan E. Goodman Leigh Morris Sloane Institute of International Education Association of Professional Schools of International Affairs Frederick M. Hess No. 68 Report Force Task Independent American Enterprise Institute for Margaret Spellings Public Policy Research Margaret Spellings and Company Shirley Ann Jackson Stephen M. Walt U.S. Education Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute Harvard Kennedy School Kay King Randi Weingarten King Strategies American Federation of Teachers Reform and www.cfr.org National Security U.S. Education Reform and National Security Independent Task Force Report No.
    [Show full text]
  • Gabelli & Company
    One Corporate Center July 18, 2013 Rye, NY 10580-1422 Tel (914) 921-5015 www.gabelli.com Gabelli & Company News Corp. (NWSA/NWS - $15.89/$16.02 - NASDAQ) Print For “Free” - Buy FYE: 6/30 EBITDA EV/EBITDA PMV 2015P $935 m. 3.9x $29 Dividend: None Current Return: Nil 2014P 875 4.2 27 Shares O/S: 379 mil. Cl. A non voting 2013E 855 4.2 25 200 “ “ B voting 2012A 1,124 --- --- 52-Week Range: $16.37 - $14.39 COMPANY OVERVIEW New York-based News Corp. operates in five segments: 1) News and information services – U.S., U.K. and Australian publishing businesses, including The Wall Street Journal, the Times of London and the New York Post, along with News America Marketing Corp., a leading provider of free-standing inserts (FSIs, or cents-off coupons); 2) Cable network programming – Fox Sports Australia; 3) Digital real estate services – a 62% interest in publicly traded REA Group Ltd. (Australia); 4) Book publishing – HarperCollins, one of the largest English language publishers in the world with imprints such as Avon, Harper, William Morrow and Christian publishers Zondervan and Thomas Nelson; and 5) Other – primarily the company’s nascent K-12 education business, Amplify. On June 28, 2013, “old News” Corp. (now 21st Century Fox) spun off most of its non-entertainment assets (“new News”) to holders on a one-for-four basis, i.e. investors received one share of “new” News Corp. for each four shares of “old” News. On a pro forma basis, News generated an estimated $855 million of pro forma EBITDA on roughly $9.0 billion of revenues for the year ended June 30, 2013.
    [Show full text]
  • Antitrust in Attention Markets
    ANTITRUST IN ATTENTION MARKETS John M. Newman* ABSTRACT Despite its vital role in the modern marketplace, attention has largely escaped the notice of antitrust institutions and stakeholders. The scattered commentary that does exist is rife with misconceptions and misleading conjecture. One telling example is the widely held—but mistaken—notion that attention- seeking firms like Google, Facebook, Twitter, and the like are “two-sided platforms.” Upon closer inspection, these firms are instead revealed to be distributors in a familiar vertical supply-chain structure. As a result, antitrust can avoid the unnecessary confusion and risk of error that would be entailed by two- sided analysis in these markets. This Article describes the fundamentals of competition in markets for attention. It explains how best to define relevant markets, drawing lessons from the growing literature on labor-market concentration levels. It also debunks the popular misconceptions that currently permeate antitrust discourse and have begun to infect antitrust doctrine. Along with the “two-sided market” myth, these also include the mistaken conflation of increased choice with consumer welfare, the unwarranted legal immunity granted to suppliers of zero-price products, and an overemphasis on concerns about “Big Data.” The Article also explores the dark side of markets for attention, which are prone to failure, and suggests granting leniency for certain restraints on advertising levels as a partial policy response. It concludes with a call to action: the antitrust enterprise must begin paying more attention to markets for attention. * Associate Professor, University of Miami School of Law. I am grateful to participants at the UC Irvine School of Law’s Fall 2020 CALIF Roundtable for their incredibly helpful and insightful comments on an early draft of this Article.
    [Show full text]
  • Larry Berger Checks on a Scrum Board Where a Multitude of Sticky Notes Assist the Teams at Amplify in Tracking the Progress of Their Projects
    Larry Berger checks on a scrum board where a multitude of sticky notes assist the teams at Amplify in tracking the progress of their projects. PHOTO / KEN GABRIELSEN / AP IMAGES AP / GABRIELSEN KEN / PHOTO 8 EDUCATION NEXT / SPRING 2014 educationnext.org feature For Education Entrepreneurs, Innovation Yields High Returns Entrepreneurs are having a heyday. Mark Zuckerberg of Facebook graced the cover of Time magazine as Person of the Year, Ashton Kutcher played Steve Jobs of Apple in a recent biopic, and Amazon’s Jeff Bezos even bought the venerable Washington Post. Our culture is enamored with the idea that a visionary individual can create a brand-new business that not only makes it big, but also makes a big difference in the way we live and work. Meanwhile, few sectors are more desperate for new ideas than the $600 billion system of K–12 public education. Many intrepid entrepreneurs have waded into the waters, hoping to improve outcomes for students. And many have failed or fal- tered in attempting to address an institution that “alienates creative problem solvers while erecting bureaucratic barriers against those who would devise new solutions,” as Frederick Hess and Chester Finn wrote in these pages a few years back (“What Innovators Can, and Cannot, Do,” forum, Spring 2007). Education entrepreneurs create either a for-profit or nonprofit enterprise, based on their fundraising needs, the revenue model that will suit their product or service, and Learning from Larry Berger, Jonathan Harber, and Ron Packard the employees they hope to entice. Those who take the for-profit route face mistrust on the part of policymakers and many parents, and for-profit ventures have conse- quently been prevented from participating in federal grant programs like Investing in Innovation (i3) and barred from operating charter schools in some states.
    [Show full text]
  • The Rise of Aggressive Policing and Zero Tolerance Discipline in New York City Public Schools
    NYLS Law Review Vols. 22-63 (1976-2019) Volume 56 Issue 4 Juvenile Justice Reform in New York Article 5 January 2012 Criminalizing the Classroom: The Rise of Aggressive Policing and Zero Tolerance Discipline in New York City Public Schools Udi Ofer New York Law School Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.nyls.edu/nyls_law_review Part of the Criminal Law Commons, and the Law Enforcement and Corrections Commons Recommended Citation Udi Ofer, Criminalizing the Classroom: The Rise of Aggressive Policing and Zero Tolerance Discipline in New York City Public Schools, 56 N.Y.L. SCH. L. REV. 1374 (2011-2012). This Article is brought to you for free and open access by DigitalCommons@NYLS. It has been accepted for inclusion in NYLS Law Review by an authorized editor of DigitalCommons@NYLS. VOLUME 56 | 2011/12 UDI OFER Criminalizing the Classroom: The Rise of Aggressive Policing and Zero Tolerance Discipline in New York City Public Schools ABOUT THE AUTHOR: Advocacy Director of the New York Civil Liberties Union (NYCLU), and adjunct professor at New York Law School. I would like to thank Donna Lieberman, Art Eisenberg, Johanna Miller, Angela Jones, Dennis Parker, Jennifer Carnig, Adriana Pinon, Alexis Karteron, and Catherine Kim for all of their work to protect students’ rights in New York City. I would also like to thank all of the young people who have stood up for their rights in schools, particularly the thousands of students who have worked with the Urban Youth Collaborative in New York City. Their passion is inspiring. Finally, the idea for the title of this article came from a 2007 report that I worked on along with my colleagues at the NYCLU and American Civil Liberties Union (ACLU).
    [Show full text]
  • News Corp. Buys Education Technology Company 23 November 2010
    News Corp. buys education technology company 23 November 2010 progress and deliver individualized instruction. Wireless Generation, which has 400 employees, will become a News Corp. subsidiary and will be managed by its founder and chief executive, Larry Berger, News Corp. said. Berger, Wireless Generation president and chief operating officer Josh Reibel, and its executive vice president and chief product officer Laurence Holt will collectively retain a 10 percent interest in the company, it said. The News Corporation offices in New York. News Corp. The purchase of Wireless Generation comes less said that it had agreed to acquire 90 percent of than two weeks after Joel Klein resigned as education technology company Wireless Generation for chancellor of the New York City school system to 360 million dollars in cash. join News Corp. as an executive vice president. (c) 2010 AFP News Corp. said that it had agreed to acquire 90 percent of education technology company Wireless Generation for 360 million dollars in cash. "Wireless Generation is at the forefront of individualized, technology-based learning that is poised to revolutionize public education for a new generation of students," News Corp. chairman and chief executive Rupert Murdoch said. Education of children aged five through 18 is a "500-billion-dollar sector in the US alone that is waiting desperately to be transformed by big breakthroughs that extend the reach of great teaching," he said in a statement. Established in 2000, Wireless Generation is a privately-held New York-based company serving more than 200,000 teachers and three million students across all 50 US states.
    [Show full text]