DOCSLIB.ORG

Hastings Comprehensive Plan

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Hastings Comprehensive Plan Village of Hastings-on-Hudson Draft Comprehensive Plan VILLAGE OF HASTINGS-ON-HUDSON DRAFT COMPREHENSIVE PLAN VILLAGE OF HASTINGS-ON-HUDSON, WESTCHESTER COUNTY, NEW YORK Prepared for The Village of Hastings-on-Hudson, NY Prepared by Hastings-on-Hudson Comprehensive Plan Committee with Phillips Preiss Shapiro Associates, Inc. 33-41 Newark Street Third Floor, Suite D Hoboken, NJ 07030 ACKNOWLEDGMENTS Village of Hastings-on-Hudson Board of Trustees Mayor Peter Swiderski Nicola Armacost Bruce Jennings Jeremiah Quinlan Meg Walker Francis A. Frobel, Village Manager Susan Maggiotto, Village Clerk Hastings-on-Hudson Comprehensive Plan Committee Kathy Sullivan, Chair Richard Bass Stephen Corrigan Ellen Hendrickx Betsy Imershein Robert Mayer Lynda Merchant Jim Metzger Rebecca Strutton Carolyn Summers Harry Thomas Fred Wertz Village of Hastings-on-Hudson Draft Comprehensive Plan 2 for Review 1/25/11 Table of Contents Contents Table of Contents ............................................................................................................................ 3 Chapter 1 INTRODUCTION ...................................................................................................... 4 Process ..................................................................................................................................... 5 Goals and Objectives of Comprehensive Plan......................................................................... 8 Document Organization ............................................................................................................ 9 Chapter 2. VILLAGE OVERVIEW ............................................................................................ 13 Chapter 3 THE DOWNTOWN ................................................................................................. 25 Chapter 4 LARGE TRACTS .................................................................................................... 43 Recommendations .................................................................................................................. 48 The Waterfront ........................................................................................................................ 63 Chapter 5 CIRCULATION ........................................................................................................ 73 Chapter 6 ENVIRONMENTAL SUSTAINABILITY .................................................................. 90 Chapter 7 SUSTAINABLE INFRASTRUCTURE ................................................................... 100 Chapter 8 QUALITY OF LIFE ................................................................................................ 109 Chapter 9 IMPLEMENTATION MATRIX .............................................................................. 125 APPENDIX 1 ............................................................................................................................... 126 APPENDIX 2 ............................................................................................................................... 127 Existing Zoning Definitions ................................................................................................... 127 APPENDIX 3 ............................................................................................................................... 128 Financial Analysis ................................................................................................................. 128 Village of Hastings-on-Hudson Draft Comprehensive Plan 3 for Review 1/25/11 Chapter 1 INTRODUCTION Introduction The Village of Hastings-on-Hudson (―the Village‖) is located on the eastern bank of the Hudson River about 20 miles north of midtown Manhattan. Panoramic views of the Hudson River and Palisades are offered throughout this compact community, which is two square miles in area. Because of its setting, the Village has long attracted artists and writers who strive to capture and share its beauty. At the same time, however access to the Hudson River has also made the Village a desirable place for industry, which historically, attracted a diverse workforce. The main goal of the Comprehensive Plan is to protect those assets which make the Village such a desirable community to live in while planning for and responding to potential impacts to its community character. It provides a positive vision for a sustainable community that balances financial realities, potential development, quality of life issues and much more. It captures our aspirations for what we can be while holding on to what we treasure. The Village’s assets include: location, population diversity, historic architecture, natural resources and tree-lined corridors and small town feel. Potential impacts include the anticipated redevelopment of the contaminated Waterfront area, the potential development of long-held large tracts of land whose landscape defines the Village’s corridors, rising housing prices, and the continued escalation of property taxes due in part to the loss of tax ratable Waterfront industry. Although the Village has periodically updated its zoning code over the years, a formal comprehensive plan for its development has never been prepared. The Village government and its associated committees have, however, over the years prepared a number of planning documents and assessments that have provided guidance to the Village government. Some of the more important documents are listed below. The However, the Comprehensive Plan builds upon these earlier planning efforts, often logically expanding on these earlier documents: including: The Planning Principles (1988) Planning Review (1996) The Community Vision Plan (1998) A Redevelopment Plan for Hastings-on-Hudson Waterfront (2001) Walkable Communities Workshop Report (2003) Waterfront Implementation Strategy (2004) Assessment of Park and Recreation Facilities and Fees in Lieu of Parkland (2005) Transportation Plan and Pedestrian Enhancements (2007) The Draft Local Waterfront Revitalization Program Plan (2004, updated 2007) Village of Hastings-on-Hudson Draft Comprehensive Plan 4 for Review 1/25/11 Large Tracts draft documentation (2006?) The Village has been moving toward adopting a comprehensive plan for several years. In July 2007, the Village Board of Trustees (―the Trustees‖) passed a resolution to initiate the development and consideration of a comprehensive plan for the Village. Later that year, the Comprehensive Plan Committee (―CPC‖) was empanelled. The CPC wasis made up of 11 resident volunteers from a variety of neighborhoods within the community and who have diverse backgrounds and experiences. Process From the start, the CPC’s goal was to create a Comprehensive Plan that would grow out of the Village’s strong sense of community involvement and activism. Starting in October 2007, the CPC met twice a month at the Community Center. By early 2010, the CPC had met more than 50 times. All but one meeting were open to the public and recorded by WHOH-TV. In addition, an e-mail address was made available to the public for the CPC to answer questions and receive feedback. Each month, a different member of the CPC responded to the e-mail. The Village set up a webpage for the Comprehensive Plan, which became a repository for all information related to CPC activities and reports. The CPC began by gathering data. CPC members divided into subcommittees that were focused on land use and zoning; transportation and infrastructure; economics; community background, and history and planning history; demographics; regional and local setting and intergovernmental and municipal structure; community facilities and cultural resources; community services and scenic, historic, recreational and natural resources; and sustainability. As part of a studio project during the spring 2008 semester, 11 graduate students from the Urban Planning Department of Hunter College, lead by CPC member Richard Bass, began to study the Village. The students interviewed most of the elected leaders in the Village and conducted two extensive surveys to reach the broader community. A community survey was distributed to the Village's email list. The survey was sent to almost 1,100 email recipients and 388 usable responses were received. While not a controlled scientific study or strictly limited to just Village residents, the survey did start to identify community concerns. Almost 75% of respondents were over the age of 45. While this number was slightly disproportionate to the total population, the distribution was useful in the CPC’s later focus on the Village’s aging population and its needs. Economic development and Waterfront redevelopment were the most important issues to respondents. The survey also revealed that pedestrian safety and sidewalks were a greater concern than traffic and congestion. Two-thirds of respondents indicated they Village of Hastings-on-Hudson Draft Comprehensive Plan 5 for Review 1/25/11 would like to retire in Hastings, with the majority hoping to reside in their current residence. Finally, the majority of respondents indicated they would participate in and support regional and historic tourism. The following are key findings: 40.6% of respondents indicated that their 'vision' for the future of Hastings is as a regional destination. 84.8% of respondents either agreed or strongly agreed that there is a need for waterfront redevelopment as soon as possible. 91.8% of respondents either agreed or strongly agreed that the Village needs
Load more

Recommended publications
  • 2019-Bond-Offering-Series-A-B and C
    NEW ISSUES – BOOK ENTRY ONLY Moody’s: Aaa ® Fitch: AAA (See “Ratings” herein) $222,845,000 BATTERY PARK CITY AUTHORITY Senior Revenue Bonds $72,765,000 $146,510,000 $3,570,000 Senior Revenue Bonds Senior Revenue Bonds Senior Revenue Bonds Series 2019A Series 2019B Series 2019C (Federally Taxable) (Sustainability Bonds) (Sustainability Bonds) Dated: Date of Delivery Due: As set forth on the inside cover Purpose The proceeds of the above captioned bonds (the “Series 2019 Senior Bonds”), together with other moneys of the Battery Park City Authority, doing business as Hugh L. Carey Battery Park City Authority (the “Authority”), will be used: (1) to provide for ongoing infrastructure and other capital improvements in Battery Park City; (2) to refund certain outstanding indebtedness of the Authority; and (3) to pay costs of issuance of the Series 2019 Senior Bonds. Designation as The Authority has designated the Series 2019A Senior Bonds and the Series 2019C Senior Bonds as “Sustainability Sustainability Bonds Bonds.” See “PLAN OF FINANCE – BPCA Sustainability Bond Framework; Designation of the Series 2019A and Series 2019C Senior Bonds as Sustainability Bonds” herein, Tax Exemption In the opinion of Hawkins Delafield & Wood LLP, Bond Counsel to the Authority, under existing statutes and court decisions and assuming continuing compliance with certain tax covenants described herein, (i) interest on the Series 2019A Senior Bonds and the Series 2019B Senior Bonds is excluded from gross income for Federal income tax purposes pursuant to Section 103 of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended (the “Code”), and (ii) interest on the Series 2019A Senior Bonds and the Series 2019B Senior Bonds is not treated as a preference item in calculating the alternative minimum tax under the Code.
    [Show full text]
  • Chapter 3: Construction Methods and Activities
    Chapter 3: Construction Methods and Activities 3.1 INTRODUCTION This chapter describes the construction methods and activities for the Hudson Tunnel Project’s Preferred Alternative. The Preferred Alternative has two overarching components: (1) the construction of a new trans-Hudson tunnel (the Hudson River Tunnel) and associated surface and rail system improvements; and (2) the rehabilitation of the existing North River Tunnel. To ensure that the passenger rail system continues to operate at existing service levels during construction, the new tunnel would be constructed and put into operation before the rehabilitation of the North River Tunnel occurs. The Project Sponsor that will advance the Project through final design and construction, including compliance with mitigation measures, has not yet been identified. The Project Sponsor may include one or more of the Port Authority of New York & New Jersey (PANYNJ), the National Railroad Passenger Corporation (Amtrak), New Jersey Transit Corporation (NJ TRANSIT), and/or another entity that has not yet been determined. This chapter provides an overview of the likely construction methods that would be used for the Preferred Alternative, a discussion of locations where construction would occur, and a description of the potential sequencing and schedule for construction. For the new Hudson River Tunnel, this includes construction of surface tracks in New Jersey from Secaucus to the new tunnel portal in North Bergen; a new tunnel consisting of two tracks in two separate tubes beneath the Palisades, the Hudson River, and the waterfront area in Manhattan; and track modifications near Penn Station New York (PSNY) in Manhattan; and construction of ventilation shafts and fan plants in both Hoboken and Manhattan.1 The rehabilitation of the North River Tunnel includes conventional demolition and construction methods to replace tunnel elements and rail systems.
    [Show full text]
  • Executive Summary
    Executive Summary A. INTRODUCTION The New York State Department of Transportation (NYSDOT), in cooperation with the Federal Highway Administration (FHWA), proposes to reconstruct a portion of Route 9A between Chambers and West Thames Streets in Lower Manhattan. This area is being considered for reconstruction as a result of the terrorist attacks of September 11, 2001, that destroyed the World Trade Center (WTC) and severely damaged or destroyed additional nearby structures and transportation infrastructure including portions of Route 9A. The proposed project, which is being reviewed under the National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA) as a supplement to the 1994 Route 9A Reconstruction Project Final Environmental Impact Statement (FEIS), is one of several federally funded Lower Manhattan recovery projects proposed in response to the devastation of September 11, 2001. As a transportation cornerstone in this recovery effort, the project is intended to provide a safe and efficient transportation facility that meets the goals and objectives established for Route 9A, prior to and since September 11, 2001. The proposed project takes into consideration the redevelopment efforts in Lower Manhattan; specifically, those at the WTC Site. These other initiatives have resulted in a new set of existing and future conditions, such as the WTC Memorial, which could not be foreseen in the 1994 FEIS. Therefore, while the project’s goals and objectives from the 1994 FEIS still apply, they have been updated and expanded to reflect this new set of conditions. B. PROJECT IDENTIFICATION / LOCATION Located near the Hudson River between Battery Place and 59th Street in Manhattan (see Figure S-1), Route 9A (also known as West Street) is a six- to eight-lane principal urban arterial with a continuous bikeway and walkway.
    [Show full text]
  • Transportation
    OSSINING COMPREHENSIVE PLAN Chapter 6: Transportation Goal Improve traffic conditions and roadway safety throughout the Village, increase pedestrian and bicycle opportunities, and support cost effective transit improvements. 6.1 Commutation Patterns As discussed in Chapter 5, Ossining is predominantly a bedroom community for residents who commute to New York City and other employment centers in the region. Demographic data helps to further depict general commutation patterns and trends in the Village. Census data detailed in Table 1 show that the overall number of workers who commute to the Village as of 2017 decreased by 16% since 2002, whereas the number of residents who commute outside of the Village for work has increased. 1 As of 2017, 91% of residents commute to locations outside of the Village for work. Table 1: Village of Ossining Commutation Patterns, 2002 ‐ 2017 2002 2010 2017 Workforce Employed in the Village Count Share Count Share Count Share Employed in the Village 6,531 100% 5,738 100% 5,384 100% Employed in the Village but Living Outside 5,311 81% 4,873 85% 4,463 83% Employed and Living in the Village 1,220 19% 865 15% 921 17% Workforce Living In the Village (Residents) Living in the Village 10,138 100% 9,659 100% 10,370 100% Living in the Village but Employed Outside 8,918 88% 8,794 91% 9,449 91% Living and Employed in the Village 1,220 12% 865 9% 921 9% Source: U.S. Census Bureau, Center for Economic Studies: 2002‐2017 LEHD Origin Destination Employment Statistics (LODES). While the number of residents who work in the Village has overall decreased since the early 2000s, there have been gains since 2010 (Table 1).
    [Show full text]
  • Project Purpose and Need
    Chapter 1: Project Purpose and Need A. INTRODUCTION The New York State Department of Transportation (NYSDOT), in cooperation with the Federal Highway Administration (FHWA), proposes to reconstruct a portion of Route 9A between Chambers and West Thames Streets in Lower Manhattan. This area is being considered for reconstruction as a result of the terrorist attacks of September 11, 2001, that destroyed the World Trade Center (WTC) and severely damaged or destroyed additional nearby structures and transportation infrastructure including portions of Route 9A. The proposed project, which is being reviewed under the National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA) as a supplement to the 1994 Route 9A Reconstruction Project Final Environmental Impact Statement (FEIS), is one of several federally funded Lower Manhattan recovery projects proposed in response to the devastation of September 11, 2001. As a transportation cornerstone in this recovery effort, the project is intended to provide a safe and efficient transportation facility that meets the goals and objectives established for Route 9A, prior to and since September 11, 2001. B. PROJECT IDENTIFICATION / LOCATION Located near the Hudson River between Battery Place and 59th Street in Manhattan (see Figure 1-1), Route 9A (also known as West Street) is a six- to eight-lane principal urban arterial with a continuous bikeway and walkway. Route 9A, which is part of the National Highway System, is a multi-modal facility used by cars, trucks, buses, bicycles, and pedestrians. As discussed above, the proposed project would affect only a portion of Route 9A. This section lies at the southern end of New York State Route 9A, which begins at Battery Place and extends northward for approximately 47.5 miles, until it merges with U.S.
    [Show full text]
  • Chapter 24: Final Section 4(F) Evaluation
    Chapter 24: Final Section 4(f) Evaluation 24.1 INTRODUCTION This Final Section 4(f) Evaluation evaluates and documents the Hudson Tunnel Project (the Project) in terms of its compliance with the requirements of Section 4(f) as codified at 23 USC 138 and 49 USC 303.1 Section 4(f) governs the use of land from publicly owned parks, recreation areas, and wildlife and waterfowl refuges and publicly or privately owned significant historic sites (collectively, Section 4(f) properties) that may be affected by projects approved or funded by the U.S. Department of Transportation (USDOT). The requirements of Section 4(f) apply to the operating administrations of USDOT, including the Federal Railroad Administration (FRA), the Federal Transit Administration (FTA), and the Federal Highway Administration (FHWA). FRA has made revisions to this Section 4(f) Evaluation since completion of the Draft Section 4(f) Evaluation for the Hudson Tunnel Project in 2017: • FRA updated the information on parks in proximity to the Preferred Alternative to include one additional park in New Jersey. • FRA added new information to reflect a new construction option in the discussion of proposed construction activities for the Preferred Alternative in Hudson River Park in New York. • For Hudson River Park in New York, the Draft Section 4(f) Evaluation described that FRA anticipated that the proposed construction activities for the Preferred Alternative would qualify as an exception from Section 4(f) as a temporary occupancy of land that would be so minimal as not to constitute a Section 4(f) use. Based on continuing analyses of proposed construction activities in Hudson River Park and consultation with the official with jurisdiction for that park, the Hudson River Park Trust (HRPT), FRA has concluded that the proposed construction activities would result in a use of that Section 4(f) property.
    [Show full text]
  • 3.7.3 New York Upland Routes Evaluated the Submarine
    Exhibit 3 - Alternative Analysis January 2008 (Revised March 2009) The cable will travel south along (or near) the CSX railroad ROW to the intersection of the CSX railroad ROW and the NYS&W railroad ROW. The cable will then travel east along the NYS&W railroad ROW to the west portal entrance of the abandoned 92nd Street tunnel and then travel through the tunnel under the Palisade Sill. From the east portal of the tunnel, the cable will cross under New River Road in Edgewater, NJ to the landfall location adjacent to the Hudson River. The cable route to the River will be under the parking lot at the southern end of the Edgewater Commons shopping center. 3.7.3 New York Upland Routes Evaluated Since it was determined that the most feasible landfall location in NY was to make landfall between Piers 92 and 94, with HDD operations and a transition point within W 52nd Street, the selection of the upland route to the W 49th Street Substation is driven by the maximum bending radius of the land-based cable. HTP's cable contractor has determined that the cable is capable of making a "hairpin" bend from the transition and splicing location on W 52nd Street back over to 12th Avenue and then south to the Substation. This configuration minimizes construction impacts to City streets. Without the ability to make the bend on W. 52nd Street, the alternative route would be for the cable to continue east on W 52nd street, south on 11th Avenue, west on W 51st Street, and then south on 12th Avenue to the entrance of the ConEd W 49th Street Substation.
    [Show full text]
  • MTA 2020-2024 Capital Program
    DRAFT MTA Capital Program Rebuilding New York’s Transportation 2020-2024 System CAPITAL PROGRAM As Proposed to the MTA Board September 25, 2019 new.mta.info/2020CapitalProgram As Proposed to the CPRB October 1, 2019 MTA Capital Program Rebuilding New York’s Transportation 2020-2024 System CAPITAL As Proposed to the MTA Board September 25, 2019 PROGRAM As Proposed to the CPRB October 1, 2019 new.mta.info/2020CapitalProgram 1 It’s Time to Re-invest in New York’s Transportation System. Hello New York, As the new Chairman and Delivering a transportation system worthy of the 21st CEO of the MTA, and – more century and beyond will require more than an ambitious importantly – a lifelong rider Capital Plan. Our transit revitalization efforts will be and daily customer of our bolstered by major initiatives to transform the MTA into system, I am pleased to present a world-class organization that provides its customers the proposed 2020-2024 MTA with the service they deserve. The MTA’s Transformation Capital Program. This historic and transformational Plan, approved by the Board in July 2019, outlines plan is the largest ever, outlining unprecedented levels a path to bring truly innovative and meaningful reform of investment across all of the MTA’s assets, from to the agency. Transformation priorities include subways, buses and railroads to bridges and tunnels. improving overall service through business efficiencies, This program represents a bold vision for what it will driving clearer lines of accountability, ending cost take to deliver the world-class transit system New York overruns and project delays, and reducing waste deserves.
    [Show full text]
  • CR- SEPTEMBER 9-20-13.Qxd
    SUPPLEMENT TO THE CITY RECORD THE CITY COUNCIL-STATED MEETING OF MONDAY, SEPTEMBER 24, 2012 52 PAGES THE CITY RECORD THE CITY RECORD U.S.P.S.0114-660 Official Journal of The City of New York Printed on paper containing 40% post-consumer material VOLUME CXL NUMBER 183 FRIDAY, SEPTEMBER 20, 2013 PRICE $4.00 PROPERTY DISPOSITION Comptroller . .2709 Triborough Bridge and Tunnel TABLE OF CONTENTS Citywide Administrative Services . .2708 Information Systems . .2709 Authority . .2709 PUBLIC HEARINGS & MEETINGS Design and Construction . .2709 Procurement . .2709 Citywide Purchasing . .2708 Community Boards . .2705 Environmental Protection . .2709 SPECIAL MATERIALS Police . .2708 Employees' Retirement System . .2705 Health and Hospitals Corporation . .2709 Citywide Administrative Services . .2709 Housing Authority . .2705 PROCUREMENT Housing Authority . .2709 Comptroller . .2710 Landmarks Preservation Commission . .2705 Citywide Administrative Services . .2708 Purchasing . .2709 Cultural Affairs . .2710 Office of The Mayor . .2707 Parks and Recreation . .2707 Citywide Purchasing . .2708 Law . .2709 Parks and Recreation . .2710 Board of Standards and Appeals . .2707 Municipal Supply Services . .2708 Small Business Services . .2709 Changes in Personnel . .2711 Transportation . .2707 Vendor Lists . .2708 Procurement Unit . .2709 READER'S GUIDE . .2712 190 Fordham Street-Public School 102 (later Public School 17 THE CITY RECORD MICHAEL R. BLOOMBERG, Mayor - The City Island School)-Individual Landmark A Georgian Revival style building designed by C.B.J. Snyder EDNA WELLS HANDY, Commissioner, Department of Citywide Administrative Services. and built in 1897-1898 and later expanded in 1929-30. ELI BLACHMAN, Editor of The City Record. Application is to alter the entrance stairs and areaway. Community District 10. Published Monday through Friday, except legal holidays by the Department of Citywide Administrative Services of the City of New York under Authority of Section 1066 of the New York City Charter.
    [Show full text]
  • MTA 2020-2024 Capital Program
    DRAFT MTA Capital Program Rebuilding New York’s Transportation 2020-2024 System CAPITAL PROGRAM As Proposed to the MTA Board September 25, 2019 new.mta.info/2020CapitalProgram As Proposed to the CPRB October 1, 2019 MTA Capital Program Rebuilding New York’s Transportation 2020-2024 System CAPITAL As Proposed to the MTA Board September 25, 2019 PROGRAM As Proposed to the CPRB October 1, 2019 new.mta.info/2020CapitalProgram 1 It’s Time to Re-invest in New York’s Transportation System. Hello New York, As the new Chairman and Delivering a transportation system worthy of the 21st CEO of the MTA, and – more century and beyond will require more than an ambitious importantly – a lifelong rider Capital Plan. Our transit revitalization efforts will be and daily customer of our bolstered by major initiatives to transform the MTA into system, I am pleased to present a world-class organization that provides its customers the proposed 2020-2024 MTA with the service they deserve. The MTA’s Transformation Capital Program. This historic and transformational Plan, approved by the Board in July 2019, outlines plan is the largest ever, outlining unprecedented levels a path to bring truly innovative and meaningful reform of investment across all of the MTA’s assets, from to the agency. Transformation priorities include subways, buses and railroads to bridges and tunnels. improving overall service through business efficiencies, This program represents a bold vision for what it will driving clearer lines of accountability, ending cost take to deliver the world-class transit system New York overruns and project delays, and reducing waste deserves.
    [Show full text]
  • City Planning Commission
    CITY PLANNING COMMISSION March 6, 2013 / Calendar No. 7 C 130101 ZSM IN THE MATTER OF an application submitted by Hudson River Park Trust and Hudson Eagle LLC pursuant to Sections 197-c and 201 of the New York City Charter for the grant of a special permit pursuant to Section 62-834 of the Zoning Resolution to modify the use regulations of Section 62-241 (Uses on existing piers and platforms), the waterfront yard requirements of Section 62-332 (Rear yards and waterfront yards), the height and setback requirements of Section 62-342 (Developments on piers), the waterfront public access requirements of Section 62-57 (Requirements for Supplemental Public Access Areas), and the visual corridor requirements of Section 62-513 (Permitted obstructions in visual corridors), in connection with a proposed commercial development on property located at Pier 57, on the westerly side of 11th Avenue side between West 14th Street and West 16th Street (Block 662, Lot 3, and p/o Marginal Street, Wharf or Place), in an M1-5 District, Borough of Manhattan, Community District 4. This application for a special permit pursuant to Section 62-834 to modify the use regulations, the waterfront yard requirements, the height and setback requirements, the waterfront public access requirements, and the visual corridor requirements was filed by Hudson River Park Trust (“HRPT”) and Hudson Eagle LLC (a subsidiary of Young Woo & Associates) on October 23, 2012; a revised application was received on November 7, 2012 to clarify the location of and access to loading facilities. The special permit, along with its related actions, would facilitate redevelopment of Pier 57, an existing structure located in the Hudson River between West 15th Street and West 16th Street at 25 Eleventh Avenue (Block 662, Lot 3 part of Marginal Street Wharf or Place) in the Borough of Manhattan, Community District 4.
    [Show full text]
  • Vision Zero Year 6 Report
    VISION ZERO YEAR SIX REPORT | 1 6 YEAR 6 REPORT JUNE 2020 2 | VISION ZERO YEAR SIX REPORT VISION ZERO YEAR SIX REPORT | 3 % 975 LPIs 36% decline (Leading Pedestrian in pedestrian deaths at priority Intervals) installed. locations compared to before Vision Zero began 21.4 miles 158 SIPs of protected bike lanes installed (Street Improvement Projects) ! completed, including 107 in Vision Zero Priority Locations 2.3+ million 465 school zones Notices of Liability protected by speed cameras issued by speed cameras 79 locations 120.3 miles receiving left-turn of signals retimed, including calming treatment 72.4 miles of Priority Corridors BY THE NUMBERS 544 presentations 2019 81,609 to schools on safety summonses issued to drivers for Failure to Yield violations 4 | VISION ZERO YEAR SIX REPORT VISION ZERO YEAR SIX REPORT | 5 We will never stop working towards our goal of Vision Zero and saving lives across the city. Table of Contents Vision Zero Year Six Using our data-driven approach, we have identified hotspots 2 Vision Zero By the Numbers around the city that are driving the 7 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY majority of traffic fatalities, and are 12 NYC SNAPSHOT implementing targeted plans there 14 STATISTICS AND METRICS and across the city that will make A Year in Review our streets safer for all. 22 DATA-DRIVEN SOLUTIONS Mayor Bill de Blasio Expanding Public Knowledge 29 SPEED MANAGEMENT 32 TRUCKS & FREIGHT Challenges and Opportunities 36 ENGINEERING Proven Solutions Plus Innovative Ideas 44 ENFORCEMENT A Data-Driven Approach 54 FLEETS Leadership in Professional Driving 67 ENGAGEMENT Meeting New Yorkers Where They Live Vision Zero Year Seven 76 Vision Zero Year Seven Initiatives Appendix 78 Scorecard Years 1-6 90 Glossary 92 Helpful Links 95 Task Force Members 98 Vision Zero By the Numbers 6 | VISION ZERO YEAR SIX REPORT VISION ZERO YEAR SIX REPORT | 7 Executive Summary Year six of Vision Zero was the second safest year on New York City streets in recorded history – but the first year since 2013 where fatalities did not decrease from the year before.
    [Show full text]