Appendix A. Basic Information About Landslides 60 the Landslide Handbook—A Guide to Understanding Landslides
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Load more
Recommended publications
-
Porosity and Permeability Lab
Mrs. Keadle JH Science Porosity and Permeability Lab The terms porosity and permeability are related. porosity – the amount of empty space in a rock or other earth substance; this empty space is known as pore space. Porosity is how much water a substance can hold. Porosity is usually stated as a percentage of the material’s total volume. permeability – is how well water flows through rock or other earth substance. Factors that affect permeability are how large the pores in the substance are and how well the particles fit together. Water flows between the spaces in the material. If the spaces are close together such as in clay based soils, the water will tend to cling to the material and not pass through it easily or quickly. If the spaces are large, such as in the gravel, the water passes through quickly. There are two other terms that are used with water: percolation and infiltration. percolation – the downward movement of water from the land surface into soil or porous rock. infiltration – when the water enters the soil surface after falling from the atmosphere. In this lab, we will test the permeability and porosity of sand, gravel, and soil. Hypothesis Which material do you think will have the highest permeability (fastest time)? ______________ Which material do you think will have the lowest permeability (slowest time)? _____________ Which material do you think will have the highest porosity (largest spaces)? _______________ Which material do you think will have the lowest porosity (smallest spaces)? _______________ 1 Porosity and Permeability Lab Mrs. Keadle JH Science Materials 2 large cups (one with hole in bottom) water marker pea gravel timer yard soil (not potting soil) calculator sand spoon or scraper Procedure for measuring porosity 1. -
Method 9100: Saturated Hydraulic Conductivity, Saturated Leachate
METHOD 9100 SATURATED HYDRAULIC CONDUCTIVITY, SATURATED LEACHATE CONDUCTIVITY, AND INTRINSIC PERMEABILITY 1.0 INTRODUCTION 1.1 Scope and Application: This section presents methods available to hydrogeologists and and geotechnical engineers for determining the saturated hydraulic conductivity of earth materials and conductivity of soil liners to leachate, as outlined by the Part 264 permitting rules for hazardous-waste disposal facilities. In addition, a general technique to determine intrinsic permeability is provided. A cross reference between the applicable part of the RCRA Guidance Documents and associated Part 264 Standards and these test methods is provided by Table A. 1.1.1 Part 264 Subpart F establishes standards for ground water quality monitoring and environmental performance. To demonstrate compliance with these standards, a permit applicant must have knowledge of certain aspects of the hydrogeology at the disposal facility, such as hydraulic conductivity, in order to determine the compliance point and monitoring well locations and in order to develop remedial action plans when necessary. 1.1.2 In this report, the laboratory and field methods that are considered the most appropriate to meeting the requirements of Part 264 are given in sufficient detail to provide an experienced hydrogeologist or geotechnical engineer with the methodology required to conduct the tests. Additional laboratory and field methods that may be applicable under certain conditions are included by providing references to standard texts and scientific journals. 1.1.3 Included in this report are descriptions of field methods considered appropriate for estimating saturated hydraulic conductivity by single well or borehole tests. The determination of hydraulic conductivity by pumping or injection tests is not included because the latter are considered appropriate for well field design purposes but may not be appropriate for economically evaluating hydraulic conductivity for the purposes set forth in Part 264 Subpart F. -
Downloaded from the Online Library of the International Society for Soil Mechanics and Geotechnical Engineering (ISSMGE)
INTERNATIONAL SOCIETY FOR SOIL MECHANICS AND GEOTECHNICAL ENGINEERING This paper was downloaded from the Online Library of the International Society for Soil Mechanics and Geotechnical Engineering (ISSMGE). The library is available here: https://www.issmge.org/publications/online-library This is an open-access database that archives thousands of papers published under the Auspices of the ISSMGE and maintained by the Innovation and Development Committee of ISSMGE. 11/1 Stability of Natural Slopes in Quick Clays Stabilite des Pentes dans I'Argile Sensible G. AAS Civil Engineer, Norwegian G eotechnical Institute, O slo, Norway SYNOPSIS This paper attempts to explain the frequently occur ring flake- type quick clay landslides, characterize d by the ’arge volumes involved and by a sudden and very rapid fai lure along a nearly horizontal sliding surface. A conventiontional effective stress analysis based on a potential sliding surface and pore pressures p rior to failure is unable to express the risk of sliding. It seems pos sible, however, to determine a limit value of the s hear stress acting along such a sliding surface. This critical shear s tress implies that the clay will start yielding when subjected to any undrained load increment. Such critical shear stres s values have been determined by direct simple shea r tests, and are compared to the average shear stress along the slid ing surface calculated for a number of previous qui ck clay slides. INTRODUCTION vertical effective stress <Jn and a horizontal effective stress Ko*cr,j both principal stresses Statistically, at intervals of about four years, la rge quick clay slides involving clay masses of the orde r of millions of m^ occur in Norway. -
Geotechnical and Geologic Constraints on Tsunamigenic Submarine Landslides
GEOTECHNICAL AND GEOLOGIC CONSTRAINTS ON TSUNAMIGENIC SUBMARINE LANDSLIDES H.J. LEE U.S. Geological Survey, 345 Middlefield Road, Menlo Park, CA 94025 USA Abstract Modeling submarine-landslide-induced tsunamis requires many simplifications of the landslide process, although the real world is much more complicated. Clearly tsunami modelers cannot consider all facets, but there is value in being aware of the complications. This paper describes the many environments in which submarine landslides can occur and the triggers that typically initiate them. Earthquakes acting on continental or canyon slopes comprise probably the most common scenario but many other combinations of environments and triggers are possible. Surprisingly, many sediment-covered slopes in highly seismically active areas have not failed. A possible explanation for this phenomenon is a process called “seismic strengthening.” The existence of such a process reduces somewhat the risk of landslide tsunamis along active margins while maintaining the risk along passive margins. Once a trigger has initiated a landslide in one of the vulnerable environments, failed masses begin to move downslope. Depending upon initial density state, the masses may convert into fluid-like sediment flows or even more dilute turbidity currents. A model for quantifying the tendency to flow is provided. Finally, a case study of the landslides and landslide tsunamis that occurred in Port Valdez, Alaska, during the 1964 Great Alaska Earthquake is provided. The excellent data base, including before and after bathymetry, shows that both large rigid block motion and mobilized sediment flows can occur near each other during the same event. The intact blocks are more efficient in producing tsunamis but the sediment flow can move farther and can erode and entrain considerable bottom sediment as they progress across the seafloor. -
Comparison of Hydraulic Conductivities for a Sand and Gravel Aquifer in Southeastern Massachusetts, Estimated by Three Methods by LINDA P
Comparison of Hydraulic Conductivities for a Sand and Gravel Aquifer in Southeastern Massachusetts, Estimated by Three Methods By LINDA P. WARREN, PETER E. CHURCH, and MICHAEL TURTORA U.S. Geological Survey Water-Resources Investigations Report 95-4160 Prepared in cooperation with the MASSACHUSETTS HIGHWAY DEPARTMENT, RESEARCH AND MATERIALS DIVISION Marlborough, Massachusetts 1996 U.S. DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR BRUCE BABBITT, Secretary U.S. GEOLOGICAL SURVEY Gordon P. Eaton, Director For additional information write to: Copies of this report can be purchased from: Chief, Massachusetts-Rhode Island District U.S. Geological Survey U.S. Geological Survey Earth Science Information Center Water Resources Division Open-File Reports Section 28 Lord Road, Suite 280 Box 25286, MS 517 Marlborough, MA 01752 Denver Federal Center Denver, CO 80225 CONTENTS Abstract.......................................................................................................................^ 1 Introduction ..............................................................................................................................................................^ 1 Hydraulic Conductivities Estimated by Three Methods.................................................................................................... 3 PenneameterTest.............................................................^ 3 Grain-Size Analysis with the Hazen Approximation............................................................................................. 8 SlugTest...................................................^ -
Gravel Roads Maintenance & Frontrunner Training Workshop
A Ditch In Time Gravel Roads Maintenance Workshop 1 So you think you’ve got a wicked driveway 2 1600’ driveway with four switchbacks and 175’ of elevation change (11% grade) 3 Rockhouse Development, Conway 4 5 6 Swift River (left) through National Forest into Saco River that drains the MWV Valley’s developments 7 The best material starts as solid rock that is drilled & blasted… 8 Then crushed into smaller pieces and screened to produce specific size aggregate 9 How strong should it be? One big truck = 10,000 cars! 10 11 The road surface… • Lots of small aggregate (stones) to provide strength with a shape that will lock stones together to support wheels • Sufficient “fines,” the binder that will lock the stones together, to keep the stones from moving around 12 • The stone: hard and uniform in size and more angular than that made just from screening bank run gravel 13 • A proper combination of correctly sized broken rock, sand and silt/clay soil materials will produce a road surface that hardens into a strong and stable crust that forms a reasonably impervious “roof” to our road • An improper balance- a surface that is loose, soft & greasy when wet, or excessively dusty when dry (see samples) 14 One way to judge whether gravel will pack or not… 15 Here’s another way… 16 Or: The VeryFine test The sticky palm test As shown in the Camp Roads manual 17 • “Dirty” gravel packs but does not drain • “Clean” gravel drains but does not pack 18 Other road surfacing materials: • Rotten Rock- traditional surfacing material in the Mt Washington Valley -
(Sds) : Sand & Gravel
SAFETY DATA SHEET (SDS) : SAND & GRAVEL SECTION I – IDENTIFICATION PRODUCT IDENTIFIER TRADE NAME OTHER SYNONYMS Natural Sand & Gravel, Gravel Gravel Sand Construction Aggregate, River Rock, Pea Gravel, Course Aggregate RECOMMENDED USE AND RESTRICTION ON USE Used for construction purposes This product is not intended or designed for and should not be used as an abrasive blasting medium or for foundry applications. MANUFACTURER/SUPPLIER INFORMATION Martin Marietta Materials 4123 Parklake Ave Raleigh, North Carolina 27612 Phone: 919-781-4550 For additional health, safety or regulatory information and other emergency situations, call 919-781-4550 SECTION II – HAZARD(S) IDENTIFICATION HAZARD CLASSIFICATION: Category 1A Carcinogen Category 1 Specific Target Organ Toxicity (STOT) following repeated exposures Category 1 Eye Damage Category 1 Skin Corrosive SIGNAL WORD: DANGER HAZARD STATEMENTS: May cause cancer by inhalation. Causes damage to lungs, kidneys and autoimmune system through prolonged or repeated exposure by inhalation. Causes severe skin burns and serious eye damage. PRECAUTIONARY STATEMENTS Do not handle until the safety information presented in this SDS has been read and understood. Do not breathe dusts or mists. Do not eat, drink or smoke while manually handling this product. Wash skin thoroughly after manually handling. If swallowed: Rinse mouth and do not induce vomiting. If on skin (or hair): Rinse skin after manually handling and wash contaminated clothing if there is potential for direct skin contact before reuse. If inhaled excessively: Remove person to fresh air and keep comfortable for breathing. If in eyes: Rinse cautiously with water for several minutes. Remove contact lenses, if present and easy to do, and continue rinsing. -
Step 2-Soil Mechanics
Step 2 – Soil Mechanics Introduction Webster defines the term mechanics as a branch of physical science that deals with energy and forces and their effect on bodies. Soil mechanics is the branch of mechanics that deals with the action of forces on soil masses. The soil that occurs at or near the surface of the earth is one of the most widely encountered materials in civil, structural and architectural engineering. Soil ranks high in degree of importance when compared to the numerous other materials (i.e. steel, concrete, masonry, etc.) used in engineering. Soil is a construction material used in many structures, such as retaining walls, dams, and levees. Soil is also a foundation material upon which structures rest. All structures, regardless of the material from which they are constructed, ultimately rest upon soil or rock. Hence, the load capacity and settlement behavior of foundations depend on the character of the underlying soils, and on their action under the stress imposed by the foundation. Based on this, it is appropriate to consider soil as a structural material, but it differs from other structural materials in several important aspects. Steel is a manufactured material whose physical and chemical properties can be very accurately controlled during the manufacturing process. Soil is a natural material, which occurs in infinite variety and whose engineering properties can vary widely from place to place – even within the confines of a single construction project. Geotechnical engineering practice is devoted to the location of various soils encountered on a project, the determination of their engineering properties, correlating those properties to the project requirements, and the selection of the best available soils for use with the various structural elements of the project. -
Landslide Risks in the Göta River Valley in a Changing Climate
Landslide risks in the Göta River valley in a changing climate Final report Part 2 - Mapping GÄU The Göta River investigation 2009 - 2011 Linköping 2012 The Göta River investigation Swedish Geotechnical Institute (SGI) Final report, Part 2 SE-581 93 Linköping, Sweden Order Information service, SGI Tel: +46 13 201804 Fax: +46 13 201914 E-mail: [email protected] Download the report on our website: www.swedgeo.se Photos on the cover © SGI Landslide risks in the Göta River valley in a changing climate Final report Part 2 - Mapping Linköping 2012 4 Landslide risks in the Göta älv valley in a changing climate 5 Preface In 2008, the Swedish Government commissioned the Swedish Geotechnical Institute (SGI) to con- duct a mapping of the risks for landslides along the entire river Göta älv (hereinafter called the Gö- ta River) - risks resulting from the increased flow in the river that would be brought about by cli- mate change (M2008/4694/A). The investigation has been conducted during the period 2009-2011. The date of the final report has, following a government decision (17/11/2011), been postponed until 30 March 2012. The assignment has involved a comprehensive risk analysis incorporating calculations of the prob- ability of landslides and evaluation of the consequences that could arise from such incidents. By identifying the various areas at risk, an assessment has been made of locations where geotechnical stabilising measures may be necessary. An overall cost assessment of the geotechnical aspects of the stabilising measures has been conducted in the areas with a high landslide risk. -
Estimating Permeability from the Grain-Size Distributions of Natural Sediment
Wright State University CORE Scholar Browse all Theses and Dissertations Theses and Dissertations 2010 Estimating Permeability from the Grain-Size Distributions of Natural Sediment Lawrence Mastera Wright State University Follow this and additional works at: https://corescholar.libraries.wright.edu/etd_all Part of the Earth Sciences Commons, and the Environmental Sciences Commons Repository Citation Mastera, Lawrence, "Estimating Permeability from the Grain-Size Distributions of Natural Sediment" (2010). Browse all Theses and Dissertations. 994. https://corescholar.libraries.wright.edu/etd_all/994 This Thesis is brought to you for free and open access by the Theses and Dissertations at CORE Scholar. It has been accepted for inclusion in Browse all Theses and Dissertations by an authorized administrator of CORE Scholar. For more information, please contact [email protected]. ESTIMATING PERMEABILITY FROM THE GRAIN-SIZE DISTRIBUTIONS OF NATURAL SEDIMENT A thesis submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Master of Science By LAWRENCE JOHN MASTERA B.S., Norwich University, 2008 2010 Wright State University WRIGHT STATE UNIVERSITY SCHOOL OF GRADUATE STUDIES June 10, 2010 I HEREBY RECOMMEND THAT THE THESIS PREPARED UNDER MY SUPERVISION BY Lawrence John Mastera ENTITLED Estimating Permeability from the Grain-Size Distributions of Natural Sediment BE ACCEPTED IN PARTIAL FULFILLMENT OF THE REQUIREMENTS FOR THE DEGREE OF Master of Science. Robert W. Ritzi, Jr., Ph.D. Thesis Director David F. Dominic, Ph.D. Department Chair Committee on Final Examination Robert W. Ritzi, Jr., Ph.D. David F. Dominic, Ph.D. Mark N. Goltz, Ph.D. Ramya Ramanathan, Ph.D. John A. Bantle, Ph.D. -
Assessment of Liquefaction/Cyclic Failure Potential of Alluvial Deposits on the Eastern Coast of Cyprus
Missouri University of Science and Technology Scholars' Mine International Conferences on Recent Advances 2010 - Fifth International Conference on Recent in Geotechnical Earthquake Engineering and Advances in Geotechnical Earthquake Soil Dynamics Engineering and Soil Dynamics 26 May 2010, 4:45 pm - 6:45 pm Assessment of Liquefaction/Cyclic Failure Potential of Alluvial Deposits on the Eastern Coast of Cyprus Huriye Bilsel Eastern Mediterranean University, Cyprus Goknur Erhan Eastern Mediterranean University, Cyprus Turan Durgunoglu Bogazici University, Turkey Follow this and additional works at: https://scholarsmine.mst.edu/icrageesd Part of the Geotechnical Engineering Commons Recommended Citation Bilsel, Huriye; Erhan, Goknur; and Durgunoglu, Turan, "Assessment of Liquefaction/Cyclic Failure Potential of Alluvial Deposits on the Eastern Coast of Cyprus" (2010). International Conferences on Recent Advances in Geotechnical Earthquake Engineering and Soil Dynamics. 3. https://scholarsmine.mst.edu/icrageesd/05icrageesd/session01/3 This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial-No Derivative Works 4.0 License. This Article - Conference proceedings is brought to you for free and open access by Scholars' Mine. It has been accepted for inclusion in International Conferences on Recent Advances in Geotechnical Earthquake Engineering and Soil Dynamics by an authorized administrator of Scholars' Mine. This work is protected by U. S. Copyright Law. Unauthorized use including reproduction for redistribution requires the permission of the copyright holder. For more information, please contact [email protected]. ASSESSMENT OF LIQUEFACTION/CYCLIC FAILURE POTENTIAL OF ALLUVIAL DEPOSITS ON THE EASTERN COAST OF CYPRUS Huriye Bilsel Goknur Erhan Turan Durgunoglu Eastern Mediterranean University Eastern Mediterranean University P.E., Ph.D., F. ASCE Famagusta- N. -
A Multidisciplinary Geophysical and Geotechnical Investigation of Quick
A multidisciplinary geophysical and geotechnical investigation of quick clay landslides in Sweden Alireza Malehmir*, Silvia Salas Romero, Chunling Shan, Emil Lundberg and Christopher Juhlin, Uppsala University; Mehrdad Bastani and Lena Persson, Geological Survey of Sweden; Charlotte Krawczyk and Ulrich Polom, Leibniz Institute for Applied Geophysics; Anna Adamczyk and Michal Malinowski, Polish Academy of Sciences; Marcus Gurk, University of Cologne; Nazli Ismail, Syiah Kuala University Summary (SEG) through its Geoscientists Without Borders (GWB) program sponsored a study of the geophysical properties Landslides are one of the most commonly occurring natural associated with quick-clay landslides in order to provide disasters. They claim hundreds of human lives and cost tools and techniques to mitigate risks associated with them. billions of dollars every year. In order to provide An area near the Göta River in southwest Sweden, which geophysical tools and techniques to better characterize sites was the scene of a quick clay landslide about 40 years ago, prone to slide, we have been carrying out and evaluating was chosen as the experimental site (Malehmir et al., potential utility of several geophysical surveys over a quick 2013a,b). Göta River (Fig. 1) is the source of drinking clay landslide site in southwest Sweden since 2011. The water for about 700,000 people and is used extensively for measurements include 2D and 3D P- and S-wave high industrial transportation. Therefore, areas near the river are resolution surface seismics, radio- and controlled-source highly industrialized and populated. electromagnetics, geoelectrics, ground gravity and magnetic surveys. A particular focus here is given to the seismic studies in the site.