The Case of Tyson Foods

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

The Case of Tyson Foods University of Tennessee, Knoxville TRACE: Tennessee Research and Creative Exchange Doctoral Dissertations Graduate School 8-2014 Agent of Harm and Good Corporate Citizen? The Case of Tyson Foods Jennifer Lindmar Schally University of Tennessee - Knoxville, [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: https://trace.tennessee.edu/utk_graddiss Part of the Criminology Commons Recommended Citation Schally, Jennifer Lindmar, "Agent of Harm and Good Corporate Citizen? The Case of Tyson Foods. " PhD diss., University of Tennessee, 2014. https://trace.tennessee.edu/utk_graddiss/2856 This Dissertation is brought to you for free and open access by the Graduate School at TRACE: Tennessee Research and Creative Exchange. It has been accepted for inclusion in Doctoral Dissertations by an authorized administrator of TRACE: Tennessee Research and Creative Exchange. For more information, please contact [email protected]. To the Graduate Council: I am submitting herewith a dissertation written by Jennifer Lindmar Schally entitled "Agent of Harm and Good Corporate Citizen? The Case of Tyson Foods." I have examined the final electronic copy of this dissertation for form and content and recommend that it be accepted in partial fulfillment of the equirr ements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy, with a major in Sociology. Lois Presser, Major Professor We have read this dissertation and recommend its acceptance: Michelle Brown, Sherry Cable, Elizabeth Strand, Avi Brisman Accepted for the Council: Carolyn R. Hodges Vice Provost and Dean of the Graduate School (Original signatures are on file with official studentecor r ds.) Agent of Harm and Good Corporate Citizen? The Case of Tyson Foods A Dissertation Presented for the Doctor of Philosophy Degree The University of Tennessee, Knoxville Jennifer Lindmar Schally August 2014 ii Copyright © 2014 by Jennifer L. Schally All rights reserved. iii Dedication For my best buddy and life partner, Jason Schally. Also in loving memory of my mother, Anne C. Johnson. iv Acknowledgements I would like to thank Dr. Lois Presser for all of her help and guidance with this project and many, many other undertakings. She has been so amazingly supportive and encouraging; I am certain I am a better student, teacher, and researcher as a result. I would also like to thank Dr. Michelle Brown, Dr. Sherry Cable, Dr. Elizabeth Strand, and Dr. Avi Brisman for serving on my committee and providing important insights that helped to make this a better project. I am also thankful for the good friends I made at UT who were so supportive of me when I struggled to get through the program in the midst of many crises- particularly Daniel Lai, Rhiannon Leebrick, and Lauren Copley. I am also very grateful to my early mentors who continue to be important guides in my professional endeavors, Dr. Stephen Couch and Dr. Chiara Sabina. Finally, I extend very special thanks to all of my family who supported and encouraged me along the way: Charlie Johnson; George and Bernie Schally; George, Margo, Max and Eliza Schally; Kim, Billy, Mandy, Taylor and Phillip Isaac; Joan and Sarah Powanda; Jessi and Craig Hunt. v Abstract Industrial agriculture inflicts major harms on nonhuman animals, the environment and human health. How do agribusinesses culturally legitimize their harmful practices? Utilizing critical discourse analysis, I clarify the ways in which one large agribusiness, Tyson Foods, disguises their actions while at the same time presents the image of a benign, good corporate citizen. The discourses employed by Tyson gain legitimacy by drawing on and aligning with larger cultural discourses that are often taken for granted. This research, situated at the intersection of green and cultural criminologies, makes a contribution to these as well as to the burgeoning social harm approach within criminology. vi Table of Contents Chapter 1 Introduction ........................................................................................................ 1 Theoretical Orientation ................................................................................................... 8 Harm Perspectives ...................................................................................................... 9 Green Criminology ................................................................................................... 10 Discursive Foundations of Harm .................................................................................. 14 Outline of the Dissertation ............................................................................................ 18 Chapter 2 Industrial Agriculture and Its Harms ............................................................... 19 The History of Industrial Agriculture in the United States ........................................... 19 The Harms of Intensive Animal Farming ..................................................................... 22 Harm to animals. ....................................................................................................... 23 Harm to the environment and human health.. ........................................................... 26 Particular Harms Perpetrated by Tyson Foods ............................................................. 28 Harm to the environment. ......................................................................................... 28 Harm to animals. ....................................................................................................... 33 Chapter 3 Contextualizing the ‗Socially Responsible‘ Corporation and the Cultural Legitimation of Harm ....................................................................................................... 39 The Dominant Social Paradigm and Corporate Power ................................................. 39 Public Relations ............................................................................................................ 44 Ethical Consumerism, Corporate Identity and CSR ..................................................... 47 Summary ....................................................................................................................... 54 Chapter 4 Research Methods: Digesting What Tyson Serves Up ................................... 56 Reflexive Statement ...................................................................................................... 57 The Theoretical Foundations of Critical Discourse Analysis ....................................... 58 Design/Sample .............................................................................................................. 62 Procedures/Analysis ...................................................................................................... 62 Chapter 5 Findings: Hiding Behind Wholesomeness ...................................................... 72 Disguising Actions ........................................................................................................ 72 Part of a Decent Whole ................................................................................................. 84 Benign Presentation of Self .......................................................................................... 91 Summary ....................................................................................................................... 96 Chapter 6 Concluding Remarks ....................................................................................... 97 What Did I Do? ............................................................................................................. 97 What Did I Find? .......................................................................................................... 98 Why Does it Matter? ................................................................................................... 102 Limitations .................................................................................................................. 103 Directions for Future Research ................................................................................... 104 List of References ........................................................................................................... 108 Vita .................................................................................................................................. 134 vii List of Tables Table 2.1. Tyson Environmental Penalties Greater than $5,000 for Fiscal Years 2010, 2011, and 2012 ......................................................................................................... 32 Table 5.1 Process Types .................................................................................................. 73 viii List of Figures Figure 5.1 Feedlot Cartoon .............................................................................................. 82 Figure 5.2 Processing Plant Cartoon ................................................................................ 83 Figure 5.3 Dilapidated Shack ............................................................................................ 87 Figure 5.4 John and Don Tyson ....................................................................................... 87 Figure 5.5 Leland Tollett .................................................................................................. 88 Figure 5.6 Polaroid Pictures on Picnic Table ................................................................... 92 Figure 5.7 Worker Taking a Water Sample .....................................................................
Recommended publications
  • Vol 2, No 5.Jpg
    MARCH 1, 1995 Written by Ken Silverstein & Alexander Cockburn VOL. 2, NO.5 The Gang's All Here! • IN THIS ISSUE • Clinton, Tyson, Wal-Mart Special Report on and the Arkansas Poultryport Infrastructure in Rural Arkansas remote cow pasture in northwest (NAC), a private group promoting re­ or Arkansas has been the focus of gional development . The airport has al­ How Clinton's Cronies A ardent lobbying by the Clinton ways been its central goal, though the are Wolfing Down White House on behalf of the president's Council has also been chasing up money the Pork billionaire Arkansas backers, who have for a number of projects decorously as­ been conniving to have taxpayers under­ sembled under the worthy label of "infra­ • The Concourse write a commercial airport planned to structure," usually a tip-0££ that have the second largest runway in the pork-barreling is under way. in the Cow Pasture nation. Many of the major players, famil­ A secretive outfit, the NAC has been iar to the public from the older and infi­ demure about detailing its activities or • Sky .Dark With Chickens nitely less grandiose web of dealings even disclosing its membership. Jim Flying Off to Tokyo known collectively as the Whitewater Blair, a charter member of the group - scandal, are mustered in the Highfill air­ and also the lawyer for Tyson Foods, a • Will They Come Home port scheme: the Walton lamily of Wal- . close friend of Bill and Hillary Clinton to Roost? Mart, Don Tyson of Tyson Foods, and and the man who handled the latter's Jim Blair, the man who handled Hillary commodity trades - once described the • How Mack McClarty Clinton's sensationally profitable com­ Council as "a self-appointed ad hoc com­ Goosed the FAA modity dealings.
    [Show full text]
  • Tyson Foods Tops FORTUNE World's Most Admired List for Food Production
    NEWS RELEASE Tyson Foods Tops FORTUNE World’s Most Admired List for Food Production 2/16/2017 Company jumps four spots to claim No. 1 ranking SPRINGDALE, Ark., Feb. 16, 2017 (GLOBE NEWSWIRE) -- Tyson Foods, Inc. (NYSE:TSN) was recognized today by Fortune magazine as No. 1 on the World’s Most Admired Companies list in the Food Production segment, moving up four places from the company’s 2016 ranking. “We’re extremely proud of the work we’ve done, but I can tell you that we’re just getting started,” said Tom Hayes, president and chief executive officer of Tyson Foods. “We’ll use this momentum to drive positive change and continue to position the company for future growth.” Fortune collaborated with its partner Korn Ferry Hay Group on this survey of corporate reputations. The survey included about 1,500 candidates: the 1,000 largest U.S. companies ranked by revenue, along with non-U.S. companies in Fortune’s Global 500 database that have revenues of $10 billion or more. The list was then winnowed to the highest-revenue companies in each industry, a total of 680 in 28 countries. The top-rated companies were picked from that pool of 680; the executives who voted work at the companies in that group. To determine the best-regarded companies in 51 industries, Korn Ferry Hay Group asked executives, directors, and analysts to rate enterprises in their own industry on nine criteria, which include ability to attract and retain talented people, quality of products and services, quality of management, innovation, social responsibility, use of corporate assets and long-term investment value.
    [Show full text]
  • Support Sustainable Protein Production: Plant-Based Meat and Cultivated Meat
    SUPPORT SUSTAINABLE PROTEIN PRODUCTION: PLANT-BASED MEAT AND CULTIVATED MEAT “ What I was experiencing was more than a clever meat substitute. It was a taste of the future of food.” — Bill Gates, commenting on Beyond Meat’s plant-based chicken. Beyond Meat is a plant-protein company founded by Columbia Business School graduate Ethan Brown. Gates has since become an investor in Beyond Meat, and former McDonald’s CEO Don Thompson is a board member. The protein industry is on the cusp of a market The United States can remain the global leader revolution. Consumers are demanding alternatives of the alternative protein sector and benefit from to conventional meat, dairy, and eggs, and by 2030, the economic strength that comes with this position. the value of the global alternative protein market To do so, we must make a concerted effort to could reach $140 billion.1 advance the science and technology that will enable this sector to expand rapidly and flourish. The United States is currently home to many By supporting the burgeoning market for alternative of the world’s leading alternative protein proteins and funding open-access research for companies. However, other governments improved protein production, policymakers can worldwide are beginning to recognize the enable business innovation while increasing economic, environmental, and public health consumer choice, conserving resources, and benefits of alternative proteins. Many of these strengthening food safety and security. governments are now investing in research and development to advance plant-based and cultivated meat, egg, and dairy production in their countries. “ Alternative protein plays an important role in our ‘future of food’ agenda….
    [Show full text]
  • Tyson "Natural" FTC Complaint 07.2.2020
    July 2, 2020 Richard Quaresima Acting Associate Director, Division of Advertising Practices Bureau of Consumer Protection Federal Trade Commission 600 Pennsylvania Avenue N.W. Washington, D.C. 20580 VIA ELECTRONIC MAIL AND U.S. POSTAL SERVICE Re: Complaint requesting action to enjoin the dissemination of false or deceptive advertising by Tyson Foods, Inc. Dear Acting Associate Director Quaresima: The attached complaint is submitted by Richman Law Group on behalf of three non-profit organizations: Animal Equality, Organic Consumers Association (“OCA”), and Food & Water Watch (“FWW”). On behalf of these organizations, we write to request that the Federal Trade Commission investigate and take action to enjoin Tyson Foods, Inc. (“Tyson”) from making false and misleading claims about its chicken products and the conditions under which they are produced. As set forth in the complaint, Tyson is egregiously misleading consumers with marketing and advertising representations that falsely suggest its chicken products are produced in a natural, environmentally responsible, and humane way. Such representations, which are widely disseminated via Tyson’s website and on certain product labels, as well as via myriad other media, indicate to consumers that Tyson’s chickens were raised under natural and humane conditions on bucolic family farms by farmers utilizing environmentally sustainable practices and adhering to standards that exceed those of the average chicken producer. These representations are untrue. In reality, the practices used by Tyson suppliers, at the direction of Tyson, fall far below the level of animal care and environmental sustainability that a reasonable consumer would expect based on the company’s representations. Tyson utilizes the same unnatural, unsustainable, and inhumane National Chicken Council (“NCC”) standards that apply to the overwhelming majority of chickens raised in the United States, but it knowingly leads consumers to believe otherwise.
    [Show full text]
  • Hillshire Brands Company Go Meat & More!
    G.research, Inc. March 13, 2014 One Corporate Center Rye, NY 10580-1422 Gabelli & Company Tel (914) 921-5197 www.gabelli.com Hillshire Brands Company HSH - $37.32 - NYSE Go Meat & More! ©2014 Gabelli & Company Sarah Donnelly (914) 921-5197 -Please Refer To Important Disclosures On The Last Page Of This Report- G.research, Inc. March 13, 2014 One Corporate Center Rye, NY 10580-1422 Tel (914) 921-5197 Gabelli & Company www.gabelli.com Hillshire Brands Company (HSH - $37.32 - NYSE) Go Meat & More! - Buy FYE: 6/30 EPS P/E PMV 2016P 2.20 16.7 $53 Dividend: $0.70 Current Return: 1.9% 2015P 2.00 18.5 50 Shares O/S: 122.4 2014E 1.75 20.9 46 52-Week Range: $38.01-$30.35 2013A 1.72 21.4 44 SUMMARY AND OPINION Hillshire Brands Company headquartered in Chicago, Illinois was renamed from the Sara Lee Corporation following the tax-free spin-off to shareholders on June 28, 2012 of the international coffee and tea company, D.E MASTER BLENDERS 1753. Hillshire generates over $4 billion in annual revenue of which nearly 90% is generated from meat- based products under leading brands, such as Jimmy Dean, Hillshire Farms, Ballpark, Aidells and Gallo. The remaining businesses include the Sara Lee branded retail bakery products and the Chef Pierre and Sara Lee foodservice bakery products. In fiscal 2014, we expect the company to generate revenue, EBITDA and earnings per share of $4.0 billion, $521 million and $1.75, respectively. We recommend shares of Hillshire Brands: - Hillshire competes today in mostly meat-centric categories, such as breakfast and smoked sausages, frozen breakfast meals, hot dogs and lunchmeat with retail sales totaling $13.8 billion.
    [Show full text]
  • ABSTRACT POLITICAL (IN)DISCRETION: HILLARY CLINTON's RESPONSE to the LEWINSKY SCANDAL by Kelsey Snyder Through an Examination
    ABSTRACT POLITICAL (IN)DISCRETION: HILLARY CLINTON’S RESPONSE TO THE LEWINSKY SCANDAL by Kelsey Snyder Through an examination of gender, politics, and media during the time of the Lewinsky scandal, this project shows that conversations about the first lady shifted throughout 1998. Just after the allegations were made public, the press and American people fought against the forthright position that Hillary took; the expectations of traditional first ladies they had known before were not met. After facing backlash via the press, the first lady receded to more acceptably defined notions of her actions, based largely in late 20th century conservative definitions of appropriate gender roles. By the end of 1998, consideration of a run for the Senate and increased public support for her more traditional image provided a compromise for Hillary Rodham Clinton’s public image. Having finally met the expectations of the nation, the press spoke less of the first lady in comparison to family values and almost exclusively by means of her political abilities. POLITICAL (IN)DISCRETION: HILLARY CLINTON’S RESPONSE TO THE LEWINSKY SCANDAL A Thesis Submitted to the Faculty of Miami University in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree Master of Arts Department of History by Kelsey Snyder Miami University Oxford, Ohio 2015 Advisor __________________________________________ Kimberly Hamlin Reader ___________________________________________ Marguerite Shaffer Reader ___________________________________________ Monica Schneider TABLE OF CONTENTS
    [Show full text]
  • Hillary Rodham Clinton
    Hillary Rodham Clinton: A History of Scandal, Corruption and Cronyism Dear Concerned American, Liberty Guard is publishing this booklet on Hillary Rodham Clinton’s history of scandal, corruption and cronyism because you won’t hear much about it from the mainstream news media. This booklet provides a summary of Hillary Clinton’s most serious scandals (that we know about so far), including many probable crimes. Our goal is to have tens of millions of Americans reading this little book before the 2016 Election so that Americans can make an informed decision with their vote. But we need your immediate help to do this. It costs us about $1 to send a copy of this little book through the mail to one American citizen. So if you are able to send LIBERTY GUARD a donation of $25, for example, this will allow us to distribute a copy of this little book via postal mail to 25 citizens. If you are able to send a $15 donation, we can put this booklet in the mailboxes of 15 Americans. Will you help make this HILLARY CLINTON BOOK DISTRIBUTION CAMPAIGN the success I know it will be if every patriot who reads this letter contributes what they can? Most members and supporters of LIBERTY GUARD are sending donations in the $15 to $25 range — though some of our friends are blessed to be able to send larger donations of $50, $100, $500, $1,000 or even more, while our other friends are making an equal sacrifice by sending donations of $12, $10 or even $8.
    [Show full text]
  • Tyson Foods Reports Third Quarter 2021 Results
    TYSON FOODS REPORTS THIRD QUARTER 2021 RESULTS Generates Increased Sales, Volume Growth and Strong Operating Results Springdale, Arkansas – August 9, 2021 – Tyson Foods, Inc. (NYSE: TSN), one of the world’s largest food companies and a recognized leader in protein with leading brands including Tyson, Jimmy Dean, Hillshire Farm, Ball Park, Wright, Aidells, ibp and State Fair, today reported the following results: (in millions, except per share data) Third Quarter Nine Months Ended 2021 2020 1 2021 2020 1 Sales $ 12,478 $ 10,022 $ 34,238 $ 31,725 Operating Income 1,062 773 2,487 2,046 Net Income 753 526 1,702 1,414 Less: Net Income Attributable to Noncontrolling Interests 4 — 10 7 Net Income Attributable to Tyson $ 749 $ 526 $ 1,692 $ 1,407 Net Income Per Share Attributable to Tyson $ 2.05 $ 1.44 $ 4.63 $ 3.85 Adjusted2 Operating Income $ 1,372 $ 758 $ 3,136 $ 2,099 Adjusted2 Net Income Per Share Attributable to Tyson $ 2.70 $ 1.40 $ 5.98 $ 3.72 1 Certain items for the third quarter and nine months of fiscal 2020 have been revised as described in Part I, Item 1. Notes to Consolidated Condensed Financial Statements in the Company's Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the fiscal quarter ended July 3, 2021. 2 The Company reports its financial results in accordance with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles (GAAP). Adjusted operating income and adjusted net income per share attributable to Tyson (Adjusted EPS) are non-GAAP financial measures. Refer to the end of this release for an explanation and reconciliation of these and other non-GAAP financial measures used in this release to comparable GAAP measures.
    [Show full text]
  • A Reconsideration of Agricultural Law: a Call for the Law of Food, Farming, and Sustainability
    William & Mary Environmental Law and Policy Review Volume 34 (2009-2010) Issue 3 Article 5 April 2010 A Reconsideration of Agricultural Law: A Call for the Law of Food, Farming, and Sustainability Susan A. Schneider Follow this and additional works at: https://scholarship.law.wm.edu/wmelpr Part of the Food and Drug Law Commons Repository Citation Susan A. Schneider, A Reconsideration of Agricultural Law: A Call for the Law of Food, Farming, and Sustainability, 34 Wm. & Mary Envtl. L. & Pol'y Rev. 935 (2010), https://scholarship.law.wm.edu/wmelpr/vol34/iss3/5 Copyright c 2010 by the authors. This article is brought to you by the William & Mary Law School Scholarship Repository. https://scholarship.law.wm.edu/wmelpr A RECONSIDERATION OF AGRICULTURAL LAW: A CALL FOR THE LAW OF FOOD, FARMING, AND SUSTAINABILITY SUSAN A. SCHNEIDER* Agricultural law can be defined as the study of the network of laws and policies that apply to the production, marketing, and sale of agricultural products, i.e., the food we eat, the natural fibers we wear, and increasingly, the bio-fuels that run our vehicles.1 American agricultural policy has evolved from its early focus on agricultural development and expansion to its current focus on economic and political support for the agricultural sector.2 Agricultural law as a dis- cipline has tracked this policy, with agricultural law scholars debating the origins and the validity of the special treatment of agriculture under the law. This article reviews these debates and calls for a reconsideration of agricultural law and policy to address the unique aspects of agricultural production, the fragility of the environment, and the fundamental need for healthy food.
    [Show full text]
  • 2007 Environmental Award Recipients Recipients for the Second Annual Environmental Achievement and Recognition Awards Were Honored Oct
    2007 Environmental Award Recipients Recipients for the second annual Environmental Achievement and Recognition Awards were honored Oct. 24, 2007 at McCormick Place in Chicago, Ill. as part of the 2007 AMI International Meat, Poultry & Seafood Convention and Exposition part of the Worldwide Food Expo 2007 to the following facilities. Environmental Achievement Awards Community Outreach 1st Place: Farmland Foods, Inc. - Crete, Neb. 2nd Place: Tyson Foods, Inc. - Noel, Mo. Environmental Training Programs 1st Place: Sara Lee Corporation - Claryville Facility - Alexandria, Ky. 2nd Place: Smithfield - Wilson, N.C. Pollution Prevention 1st Place: Sara Lee Corporation - St. Joseph, Mo. 2nd Place: Farmland Foods, Inc. - Carroll, Iowa 2nd Place: John Morrell Co. - Mohawk Packing - San Jose, Calif. Resource Conservation 1st Place: Smithfield Beef Group - Green Bay, Inc. - Green Bay, Wisc. 2nd Place: Sara Lee Corporation - Claryville Facility - Alexandria, Ky. 3rd Place: Cargill Meat Solutions - Wapello Co. Facility - Ottumwa, Iowa Environmental Recognition Awards Tier 4 Cook’s Hams, Inc. - Grayson, Ky Curly’s Foods, Inc. - Sioux City, Iowa Farmland Foods, Inc. - Carroll, Iowa Farmland Foods, Inc. - Crete, Neb. Farmland Foods, Inc. - Denison, Iowa Farmland Foods, Inc. - Independence, Mo. Farmland Foods, Inc. - Monmouth, Ill. Farmland Foods, Inc. - New Riegel, Ohio Farmland Foods, Inc. - Salt Lake City, Utah Farmland Foods, Inc. - Springfield, Mass. Farmland Foods, Inc. - Wichita, Kan. John Morrell & Co. - Great Bend, Kan. John Morrell & Co. - Mohawk Packing - San Jose, Calif. John Morrell & Co. - Saratoga Chemical - Northlake, Ill. John Morrell & Co. - Saratoga Spice - Elmhurst, Ill. John Morrell & Co.- Sioux City, Iowa John Morrell & Co. - Sioux Falls, S.D. John Morrell & Co. - Springdale - Cincinnati, Ohio North Side Foods - Arnold, Pa.
    [Show full text]
  • 2019 SUSTAINABILITY REPORT Approach — We Take a Holistic Approach to Sustainability Focused on Social, Environmental and Economic Stewardship
    Grow RESPONSIBLY Deliver PROGRESS Sustain OUR WORLD 2019 SUSTAINABILITY REPORT Approach — We take a holistic approach to sustainability focused on social, environmental and economic stewardship. IN THIS SECTION 3 Our Business 10 Commitments 6 CEO Message 11 Governance 7 CSO Message 12 Materiality 8 Sustainability Strategy 14 Stakeholder Engagement 2019 SUSTAINABILITY REPORT APPROACH Our Business We are a company guided and grounded by our purpose: raising the world’s expectations for how much good food can do. For more than 80 years, we have been committed to revolutionizing products, appetizers, snacks, prepared meals, ethnic foods, the food industry. John Tyson built our company on providing side dishes, meat dishes, breadsticks and processed meats. generations of families with wholesome, great-tasting chicken. We are proud of our heritage. Today’s Tyson Foods is much more. • Commodity Meat and Poultry: Fresh chicken, beef and pork, As values and behaviors around food have changed, so have we. and specialty meats. Today, we’re innovators uniquely positioned to reshape what it • Alternative Proteins: Investments in alternative protein ventures, means to feed our world. Our broad portfolio of high-quality as well as our own line of plant-based and blended proteins. products and brands include: • Value-Added Chicken: Our value-added chicken products primarily include breaded chicken strips, nuggets, patties and Reach We make food in 10 countries, on three continents and sell other ready-to-fix or fully cooked chicken parts. food all over the world. During the year, we sold products in • Prepared Foods: Products primarily include ready-to-eat approximately 145 countries, with major sales markets in sandwiches, sandwich components such as flame-grilled Australia, Canada, Central America, Chile, China, the European hamburgers and Philly steaks, pepperoni, bacon, breakfast Union, Japan, Malaysia, Mexico, the Middle East, South Korea, sausage, turkey, lunchmeat, hot dogs, flour and corn tortilla Taiwan and Thailand.
    [Show full text]
  • Unhealthy Developing World Food Markets
    Unhealthy Developing World Food Markets May 2013 Problem Statement and Key Messages Low income populations (i.e., those living on $2-13 USD/day) in developing countries are disproportionally vulnerable to what is affordable, accessible and aspirational, and are increasingly incorporating available “unhealthy foods” (high in fat, sugar, salt, and calories with little nutritional value) into their diets. While changing food markets may bring potential benefits including improved food safety, security, and product diversity, overconsumption of these unhealthy foods leads to a burden of health and financial impacts, including obesity, hypertension, diabetes, loss of productivity and absenteeism for these low income individuals, their families and the broader societies in which they live. Key Messages 1. Developing countries are increasingly consuming higher proportions and health organizations are still predominantly focused on under- of unhealthy foods, resulting in diets that are high in fat, sugar, salt, nutrition, with limited partnerships working to address cross sector and calories with little nutritional value. This is a global phenomenon issues of agriculture and nutrition. There are few models designed to that affects over 1 billion low income individuals (earning $2-13/day) address food markets explicitly. who are disproportionally vulnerable to foods that are cheap, 5. Trends, including urbanization, expansion of supermarkets and convenient, and readily accessible. activities of large food and beverage companies, indicate that this 2. Unhealthy food markets contribute to negative health outcomes that problem will grow in urgency in the coming decades. Areas of can also impact the financial wellbeing of low income individuals, dynamism include the emergence of over and under nutrition, and their households and the developing countries in which they live.
    [Show full text]