DOCSLIB.ORG

Hoffmann Architects, Inc. G000

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Hoffmann Architects, Inc. G000 DRAWINGS G000 COVER SHEET G001 SITE PLAN, ABBREVIATIONS, SYMBOLS, AND NOTES A101 FLOOR PLANS A201 EAST AND SOUTH ELEVATIONS A202 WEST AND NORTH ELEVATIONS FACADE REPAIRS A501 DETAILS 61 DURANT TERRACE MIDDLETOWN, CT CITY OF MIDDLETOWN 245 deKOVEN DRIVE 06457 HOFFMANN ARCHITECTS, INC. 2711 Jefferson Davis Highway, Suite 333 2321 Whitney Avenue, 2 nd Floor 1040 Avenue of the Americas, Suite 14C Arlington, VA Hamden, Connecticut New York, NY SEAL 22202 06518 10018 PROJECT NO. 219068 17 SEPTEMBER 2020 G000 COPYRIGHT HOFFMANN ARCHITECTS, INC. 2020 DURANT TERRACE (ONE WAY) FACADE SIDEWALK SIDEWALK REPAIRS MAIN DRIVEWAY ENTRANCE CANOPY 61 DURANT TERRACE MAIN ENTRANCE MIDDLETOWN, CT NORTH PARKING LOT LAKE STREET EXISTING BUILDING ENTRANCE/ ENTRANCE/ 61 DURANT TERRACE EXIT EXIT BUILDING ADDRESS: SIDEWALK 61 DURANT TERRACE DUMPSTERS SOUTH PARKING LOT MIDDLETOWN, CT 06457 DURANT STREET ENTRANCE/ EXISTING TERRACE EXIT SIDEWALK CLIENT / OWNER: CITY OF MIDDLETOWN EXISTING 245 deKOVEN DRIVE PERGOLA MIDDLETOWN, CT 01109 SITE PLAN EXISTING SCALE: BOCCE COURT BIRDSEY AVENUE (ONE WAY) GENERAL NOTES: DRAFTING SYMBOLS: SIDEWALK 1. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL FIELD VERIFY ALL DIMENSIONS AND CONDITIONS OF THE SITE AND/OR BUILDING. 2. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL, UNLESS OTHERWISE PROVIDED IN THE NORTH ARROW CONTRACT DOCUMENTS, SECURE AND PAY FOR THE REQUIRED CONSTRUCTION PERMIT(S), FEES, LICENSES AND INSPECTIONS NECESSARY FOR THE PROPER EXECUTION OF THE WORK. 3. COORDINATION OF ALL WORK UNDER THIS CONTRACT SHALL BE MAINTAINED TO ENSURE THE QUALITY AND TIMELY COMPLETION OF FLOOR ELEVATION MARK THE WORK/PROJECT. ELEVATION NOTICE: 4. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL PERFORM ALL CUTTING AND PATCHING REQUIRED TO COMPLETE THE WORK OR TO MAKE ITS PARTS FIT DO NOT SCALE DRAWINGS. TOGETHER PROPERLY WITHOUT COMPROMISING THE QUALITY OF CONTRACTOR IS RESPONSIBLE FOR THE WORK. VERIFYING ALL DIMENSIONS AND DETAILS. REPORT ANY DISCREPANCIES 5. PRIOR TO BEGINNING WORK AT SITE, WHERE POSSIBLE, AND COLUMN LINE TO THE ARCHITECT FOR RESOLUTION. THROUGHOUT THE COURSE OF THE WORK, INSPECT AND VERIFY THE LOCATION AND CONDITION OF EVERY ITEM AFFECTED BY THE WORK UNDER THIS CONTRACT AND REPORT DISCREPANCIES TO ARCHITECT BEFORE DOING WORK . DRAWING TITLES: 6. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR ADEQUATELY CODE DATA: BUILDING DEPARTMENT NOTES: ABBREVIATIONS: BRACING AND PROTECTING ALL WORK DURING CONSTRUCTION AGAINST DAMAGE, BREAKAGE, COLLAPSE, DISTORTIONS, AND OFF X DRAWING NAME ALIGNMENTS ACCORDING TO CODES AND STANDARDS OF GOOD SCALE: 2018 CONNECTICUT STATE BUILDING CODE: THE FOLLOWING NOTES SHALL APPLY THROUGHOUT: A.F.F. ABOVE FINISHED FLOOR IN INCH PRACTICE. AXXX AHU AIR HANDLING UNIT HOFFMANN ARCHITECTS, INC. THRESHOLD BUILDING LIMITS: NOT APPLICABLE - REPAIRS TO EXISTING 1. WORK SHALL BE EXECUTED IN FULL COMPLIANCE WITH THE APPLICABLE INSUL. INSULATION 7. PRIOR TO BEGINNING WORK AT SITE, INSPECT THE EXISTING 2321 WHITNEY AVENUE PROVISIONS OF ALL LAWS, BY-LAWS, STATUTES, ORDINANCES, CODES, RULES, APPROX. APPROXIMATELY MAX. MAXIMUM HAMDEN, CONNECTICUT 06518 BUILDING AND DETERMINE THE EXTENT OF EXISTING ITEMS WHICH USE GROUP CLASSIFICATIONS: A-2, B REGULATIONS AND LAWFUL ORDERS OF PUBLIC AUTHORITIES BEARING ON THE (203) 239-6660 MUST BE REMOVED AND REINSTALLED IN ORDER TO PERFORM THE DRAWING NAME PERFORMANCE AND EXECUTION OF THE WORK. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL ARCH. ARCHITECTURAL MIN. MINIMUM WORK UNDER THIS CONTRACT. SCALE: CONSTRUCTION TYPE: EXISTING, TYPE III A PROMPTLY NOTIFY THE OWNER OF ANY PORTIONS OF THE WORK, IN THE AT EXISTING LIGHTNING MISC. MISCELLANEOUS CONTRACT DOCUMENTS THAT ARE AT VARIANCE WITH THE ABOVE. 8. ALL WORK IS TO CONFORM TO ALL APPLICABLE REQUIREMENTS OF TOTAL OCCUPANT LOAD: EXISTING, NOT AFFECTED BY WORK AIR TERMINAL MECH. MECHANICAL SEAL: LOCAL GOVERNING CODES, CT DEPT. OF LABOR, INDUSTRIAL LABOR ELEVATION REFERENCE: 2. THE CONSTRUCTION CLASSIFICATION OF THE BUILDING SHALL REMAIN CODE, HEALTH CODE, FIRE DEPARTMENT REGULATIONS, NBFU AND CAPACITY OF EXITS: EXISTING, NOT AFFECTED BY WORK UNCHANGED. BLDG. BUILDING N NORTH UTILITY CODES, OSHA CODES AND THE MASSACHUSETTS STATE BUILDING CODE. FIRE RESISTANCE RATINGS: EXISTING, NOT AFFECTED BY WORK 3. NO CHANGE TO EXISTING BUILDING OCCUPANCY, USE, OR MEANS OF EGRESS. BR BRICK REPAIR N.I.C. NOT IN CONTRACT X DRAWING NUMBER NO. NUMBER 9. DRAWINGS ARE NOT TO BE SCALED. ALL DIMENSIONS AND AXXX SHEET NUMBER FIRE PROTECTION SYSTEM: EXISTING, NOT AFFECTED BY WORK 4. ALL PRE-EXISTING BUILDINGS CLEARANCES AND SETBACKS FROM THE C.J. CONTROL JOINT CONDITIONS SHOWN AND ASSUMED ON THE DRAWINGS MUST BE N.T.S. NOT TO SCALE PROPERTY LINES SHALL BE MAINTAINED. CL CENTER LINE VERIFIED AT THE SITE BY THE CONTRACTOR BEFORE ORDERING ANY CLASSIFICATION OF OCCUPANCY: EXISTING BUSINESS MATERIAL OR DOING ANY WORK. ANY DISCREPANCIES IN THE 5. THE OWNER WILL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR FILING WITH, OBTAINING APPROVAL CMU CEMENT MASONRY UNIT O.C. ON CENTER DRAWINGS AND SPECIFICATIONS SHALL BE REPORTED TO THE DETAIL REFERENCES: NOTIFICATION ALARMS: EXISTING TO REMAIN UNCHANGED FROM, PAY ALL RELATED FEES, AND OBTAINING ALL THE NECESSARY CONT. CONTINUOUS ARCHITECT. NO CHANGE IN DRAWINGS OR SPECIFICATIONS IS CONSTRUCTION PERMITS FROM THE DEPARTMENT OF BUILDINGS AND COMPLY O.D. OUTSIDE DIAMETER PERMISSIBLE WITHOUT THE WRITTEN CONSENT OF THE ARCHITECT. DETECTION SYSTEM: EXISTING TO REMAIN UNCHANGED WITH THE DEPARTMENT OF BUILDINGS REQUIREMENTS FOR PUBLIC PROTECTION. OPP. OPPOSITE X DRAWING NUMBER DIA. DIAMETER 10. ALL WORK ON THESE DRAWINGS SHALL BE CONSIDERED NEW WORK AXXX SHEET NUMBER EXTINGUISHING SYSTEM: EXISTING TO REMAIN UNCHANGED PL. PLATE DRAWN BY: ELK WHETHER STATED OR NOT EXCEPT WHERE SPECIFICALLY NOTED AS DL DRAIN LEADER PP PITCH POCKET CHECKED BY: LEK/RMS "EXISTING". DN DOWN DATE: 9/17/20 PT. PRESSURE TREATED 11. DETAILS NOT SHOWN OR SPECIFIED, BUT NECESSARY FOR PROPER X DRAWING NUMBER DS DOWN SPOUT SCALE: AS NOTED AND ACCEPTABLE CONSTRUCTION, INSTALLATION OR OPERATION AXXX SHEET NUMBER R RADIUS OF ANY PART OF THE WORK AS DETERMINED BY THE ARCHITECT, DWG. DRAWING SHALL BE INCLUDED IN THE WORK THE SAME AS IF HEREIN R.D. ROOF DRAIN SPECIFIED OR INDICATED, AT NO ADDITIONAL COST TO THE OWNER. EF EXISTING EXHAUST FAN REQ'D. REQUIRED E.J. EXPANSION JOINT 12. DURING CONSTRUCTION, TEMPORARY BAFFLES TO SEAL CONST. CODE INFORMATION: SAFETY NOTES: R.L. RAIN LEADER SITE PLAN, OPENINGS TO PREVENT DUST, DIRT AND ODORS FROM FILTERING EL. ELEVATION INTO OCCUPIED AREAS ARE TO BE PROVIDED BY CONTRACTOR. RTU ROOFTOP UNIT 2018 CONNECTICUT STATE BUILDING CODE THE FOLLOWING SHALL APPLY THROUGHOUT: EQ. EQUAL ABREVIATIONS, 13. CONTRACTOR SHALL RELOCATE/MODIFY AND PATCH ANY EXISTING EXIST. EXISTING S SCUPPER ITEMS INTERFERING WITH THE INSTALLATION OF NEW WORK, INTERNATIONAL CODE COUNCIL (ICC) 1. CONSTRUCTION OPERATION WILL NOT BLOCK HALLWAYS OR MEANS OF EGRESS FOR SYMBOLS, AND DRAWING NUMBER SAN SANITARY WHETHER SHOWN OR NOT ON THESE DRAWINGS. X OCCUPANTS OF THE BUILDING. EXT. EXTERIOR AXXX SHEET NUMBER · 2015 INTERNATIONAL BUILDING CODE (IBC) SCH. SCHEDULE NOTES 14. THE BUILDING SHALL REMAIN IN OPERATION FOR THE DURATION OF 2. CONSTRUCTION OPERATIONS WILL NOT INVOLVE INTERRUPTION OF HEATING, WATER F FAN SIM. SIMILAR THE PROJECT. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR · 2015 INTERNATIONAL EXISTING BUILDING CODE (IEBC) OR ELECTRICAL SERVICES TO TENANTS OF THE BUILDING. FL FLOOR LEVEL MAINTAINING ALL ENTRANCES AND EXITS. CONTRACTOR SHALL S.S. STAINLESS STEEL PROVIDE ALL NECESSARY BARRICADES, PROTECTION, SIGNAGE, · 2009 ICC A117.1 ACCESSIBLE AND USABLE BUILDING AND FACILITIES FT. FOOT/FEET LIGHTING, ETC. AS REQUIRED TO MAINTAIN SAFE ACCESS/EGRESS TYP. TYPICAL THROUGHOUT. G GAS G001 GA. GAUGE U.L. UNDERWRITERS 15. CONTRACTOR SHALL SUBMIT A PROPOSED PHASING/SITE SAFETY LABORATORY 219068G001.dwg PLAN TO THE OWNER FOR REVIEW PRIOR TO COMMENCEMENT OF GALV. GALVANIZED WORK. VERT. VERTICAL PROJECT NUMBER: VS VENT STACK 16. CONTRACTOR SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR MAINTAINING EXISTING HVAC HEATING, VENTILATION, AIR CONDITIONING, COOLING STREET AND SIDEWALK CLOSURE MEASURES, AND SECURING 219050 REQUIRED PERMITS FROM THE CITY OF MIDDLETOWN. COPYRIGHT HOFFMANN ARCHITECTS, INC. 2020 FACADE REPAIRS PARAPET REMOVE AND RESET EXISTING COPING, SEE DETAIL TYPICAL 7 A501 INSTALL NEW COPPER STEP FLASHING ALONG INSIDE FACE OF PARAPET, SEE DETAIL TYPICAL 61 DURANT TERRACE 10 ELEVATOR A501 STAIR SHAFT MIDDLETOWN, CT WALKWAY/PLATFORM CUPOLA WALKWAY/PLATFORM ABOVE BUILDING ADDRESS: 61 DURANT TERRACE MIDDLETOWN, CT 06457 CUPOLA REPLACE EXISTING SEALANT AND BACKER ROD AROUND CLIENT / OWNER: 1 PERIMETERS OF LOUVERS, SEE DETAIL TYPICAL 2 ROOF PLAN 3 ATTIC PLAN CITY OF MIDDLETOWN SCALE: 3/32 = 1'-0" A501 SCALE: 3/32 = 1'-0" A101 A101 245 deKOVEN DRIVE 6 REPAIR DETERIORATED WOOD TRIM, SEE DETAIL TYPICAL A501 MIDDLETOWN, CT 01109 REMOVE AND REPLACE DETERIORATED COPPER FLASHING, SEE DETAIL TYPICAL 11 A501 REPAIR DAMAGED PLASTER ON LIBRARY WALLS, REPAINT REPAIR DAMAGED PLASTER WALLS TO MATCH EXISTING (REFER ON LIBRARY WALLS, REPAINT TO PHOTO FOR EXTENT OF WORK) WALLS TO MATCH EXISTING (REFER TO PHOTO FOR EXTENT OF WORK) DUST ROOM CONFERENCE ROOM OFFICE OFFICE LOBBY ARTS & CRAFTS 5 SOCIALIZATION LIBRARY GAME ROOM NOTICE: 4 1 DO NOT SCALE DRAWINGS. KILN STAIR STAIR ELEVATOR ELEVATOR CONTRACTOR IS RESPONSIBLE FOR ROOM OFFICE VERIFYING ALL DIMENSIONS AND DETAILS. SERVER STORAGE CLOSET STAIR REPORT ANY DISCREPANCIES TO THE ARCHITECT FOR RESOLUTION. STAIR STORAGE CORRIDOR 3 STAIR STAIR 2 STAIR DINING KITCHEN ROOM HOFFMANN ARCHITECTS, INC. MEN WOMEN WOMEN HEALTH PANTRY 2321 WHITNEY AVENUE MENS CLASSROOM CLASSROOM CLASSROOM HAMDEN, CONNECTICUT 06518 SCREENING (203) 239-6660 MECHANICAL STORAGE SEAL: SPRINKLER ELEC. REPAIR DAMAGED PLASTER ON STAIRWELL WALL AND CEILING, REPAINT WALL AND CEILING TO MATCH EXISTING (REFER TO PHOTOS FOR EXTENT OF WORK) 3 UPPER LEVEL PLAN 4 LOWER LEVEL PLAN A101 SCALE: 3/32 = 1'-0" A101 SCALE: 3/32 = 1'-0" 3 DRAWN BY: ELK 9 9 9 REPAIR DAMAGED PLASTER ON WALLS, SEE DETAIL TYPICAL, REPAIR DAMAGED PLASTER ON CEILING, SEE DETAIL TYPICAL, REPAIR DAMAGED PLASTER ON WALLS, SEE DETAIL TYPICAL, A201 CHECKED BY: LEK/RMS A501 A501 A501 REPAINT WALLS TO MATCH EXISTING REPAINT CEILING MATCH EXISTING REPAINT WALLS TO MATCH EXISTING DATE: 9/17/20 ENTRANCE 1 4 4 CANOPY SCALE: AS NOTED A201 A201 A201 OPP.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • The Building Envelope: Energy Efficiency and Economics
    ISSUE 4/2009 V O L U M E 2 6 N U M B E R 4 Journal of architectural technology published by Hoffmann Architects, Inc., specialists in the rehabilitation of building exteriors. The Building Envelope: Energy Efficiency and Economics Richard P. Kadlubowski, AIA and Dean W. Yates, AIA According to the U.S. Environmen- As these structures age, we are tal Protection Agency (EPA), the con- faced with a choice: rehabilitate and struction and operation of buildings is upgrade the inefficient buildings, or responsible for nearly half of America’s replace them. greenhouse gas emissions. In com- With landmark and historic struc- parison, all forms of transportation tures, the importance of preserving combined—including airplanes, trucks, the existing building is clear. But what buses, and cars—account for just a about buildings that are neither ef- quarter of total emissions. Because so ficient nor architecturally significant? much of the country’s building stock Replacing an old building with a new was constructed when fuel was cheap one uses energy. That energy takes and plentiful, little regard was paid to many, many years to recover through designing energy-saving enclosures. improved performance—if at all. A better approach, then, is to improve the energy profile of the buildings we already have. To cut back on energy consumption, federal, state, and local authorities have adopted increasingly rigorous standards for building performance. These regulations, along with tax incentives for improved energy man- agement, have led to an upsurge in energy efficiency retrofits for existing structures. Before investing in major capital improvements to heating and cooling systems, however, consider making simple, less costly upgrades to the building enclosure.
    [Show full text]
  • Thin-Stone Veneers Offer Unique Design and Performance Demands
    Journal of architectural technology published by Hoffmann Architects, specialists in exterior rehabilitation Third Issue 1997 Volume 15 Number 3 Thin-Stone Veneers Offer Unique Design and Performance Demands relatively new product known as rein- Theodore F. Babbitt, AIA forced stone veneer is also available. Made of very thin stone veneers N ew stone-cutting technologies laminated with epoxy to a reinforcing have allowed for ever-thinner stone expanded-steel mesh, these reinforced veneers to be used as a curtain-wall stone panels come in 5/16" and 3/16" component on high-rise and other thicknesses and offer the strength of buildings, a radical departure from the stone veneers twice their thickness. traditional use of dimension stone as This new technology was developed in a load-bearing element or a heavy- Turin, Italy and to date has been used in weight, non-load bearing facade. But Europe and New York City. while these veneers offer an excellent design opportunity at a cost lower An Intrinsic Danger than dimension stone, relatively little While the engineering principles and data is available on their long-term physical properties of dimension stone performance. And problems are are well understood and tested by starting to crop up after just two time, thin-stone veneers offer a new decades of use. Owners, architects, realm of design, engineering, fabrica- and builders should be forewarned tion, transport, and installation when choosing thin-stone veneers: demands. Testing prior to installation precise detailing is essential to may show no problems, but under prevent displacement, cracking, real-world conditions, veneers may spalling, water intrusion, and, ulti- begin to display unexpected and mately, failure.
    [Show full text]
  • Sustainable Restoration of Yale University's Art + Architecture Building
    Sustainable Restoration of Yale University’s Art + Architecture Building RUSSELL M. SANDERS, BENJAMIN SHEPHERD, ELIZABETH SKOWRONEK, AND ALISON HOFFMANN Renovation of a Modernist icon Renovation of Paul Rudolph Hall at by a serious fire in 1969, the structure demanded innovation to restore the Yale University suffered a series of unsympathetic reno- vations, which split and reconfigured its original aesthetic while incorporating When Yale University’s Art + Architec- soaring double-height drafting room and ture Building was completed in 1963, sustainable-design strategies. obstructed light and views. The external New York Times architecture critic Ada facade was scarred and barely recogniz- Louise Huxtable praised it as “a spec- able after Rudolph’s vast fenestrations tacular tour de force.”1 It appeared on were filled in with double-glazed win- the cover of every major architecture dows that were disrespectful of the magazine and has since been described original geometries. Interior volumes as “the Bilbao of its day.”2 Designed by lost their definition not only through Paul Rudolph, then chair of the School unwelcome intrusions and divisions but, of Architecture, the Art + Architecture more importantly, by removal of the Building is considered one of his most ceiling planes and the signature linear important works. The complex of inter- lighting system that defined them. locking spaces and strata catapulted the For the project team in 2006, the designer to fame with its assertive treat- task was imposing: restore a controver- ment of concrete forms (Fig. 1). sial, commanding piece of American By the late 1990s, however, the build- architectural heritage while introducing ing had been so altered that it bore little new infrastructure and sustainability resemblance to its original form.
    [Show full text]
  • Hoffmann Architects, an Architecture and Engineering Firm
    NEWS Contact Alison Hoffmann 1.800.239.6665 [email protected] www.hoffarch.com HOFFMANN ARCHITECTS CELEBRATES 40 YEARS IN BUSINESS September 2017 – Hoffmann Architects, an architecture and engineering firm specializing in the rehabilitation of building exteriors, commemorates the founding of the firm 40 years ago, in 1977. Hoffmann Architects’ history began with the mission to address design details that are commonly overlooked. After immigrating to the United States from Hungary in the 1950s, Hoffmann Architects founder and president John J. Hoffmann, FAIA studied architecture at the City College of New York. As a young architect, he observed that the design of construction details was falling less and less to design professionals, and more to vendors and installers. As a result, intersections, terminations, and other details were often executed inadequately, leaving buildings open to distress and failure. In 1977, he founded his own practice, Hoffmann Architects, with the intention of providing specialized expertise in building exterior details and construction technology. Since that time, Hoffmann Architects has grown to nearly four dozen employees in three states and has evolved a reputation for excellence in building envelope rehabilitation design. Hoffmann Architects staff with owner John J. Hoffmann, FAIA (center) in the early 1980s. Consistently ranked in the top 100 architecture/engineering firms by Building Design+Construction magazine, Hoffmann Architects has contributed to the preservation and longevity of some of the most significant architectural landmarks in the United States, including the United States Capitol, the Smithsonian Institution, the Chrysler Building, Rockefeller Center, the New York Stock Exchange, the United Nations, Folger Shakespeare Library, the Ford Foundation Building, and Lincoln Center for the Performing Arts.
    [Show full text]
  • Windows: an Integral Part of the Building Envelope
    ISSUE 3/2008 V O L U M E 2 5 N U M B E R 3 Journal of architectural technology published by Hoffmann Architects, Inc., specialists in the rehabilitation of building exteriors. Windows: An Integral Part of the Building Envelope Juan Kuriyama, AIA and Bradley Carmichael, EIT With the reports from recent tion options may be limited by any clinical research substantiating the number of factors, from landmark importance of natural lighting and regulations to structural limitations to ventilation in workplace productivity, aesthetic concerns, within these limits it health, and well-being, window design is often possible to improve energy effi- has become about more than building ciency, optimize light transmittance, and aesthetics or even energy efficiency. shape building appearance both inside From the capacity to create dramatic and out. And, because deterioration in gestures in glazing afforded by glass one building component can adversely curtain wall technology, to the im- affect interrelated components, ad- provements in thermal transfer made dressing distress or inefficiency in the possible by chemical advances in the fenestration not only will impact other glazing industry, to the race to develop building systems, but, as new research carbon-neutral strategies like “day- has touted, will shape one critical part lighting” that reduce demand on the of the building dynamic: the occupants. power grid, windows have taken on multi-faceted significance in building A Window Components Primer design. Even from humankind’s earli- est attempts at creating boundaries, Before considering rehabilitation op- we’ve found that our most successful tions for existing windows, it’s impor- efforts establish meaningful connec- tant to know the composition and tions between inside and outside, properties of the existing wall system, which establish our control over the so that an appropriate, compatible delimited structure by contextualizing repair or replacement design can be developed.
    [Show full text]
  • Performance Considerations for Historic Window Replacement and Repair
    I S S U E 2/2020 VOLUME 37 NUMBER 2 Journal of architectural technology published by Hoffmann Architects, Inc., specialists in the rehabilitation of building exteriors. Performance Considerations for Historic Window Replacement and Repair Rachel C. Palisin, PE, LEED AP BD+C and Richard W. Off, AIA F rom the stained glass windows Determining a path for historic win- that welcome variegated light into dow treatment that balances aesthet- cathedrals to the steel-framed geo- ics and historic integrity with contem- metric designs of Art Deco and the porary performance standards can be bold leaded glass of the Prairie style, challenging, particularly if the windows windows have served to define the are architecturally significant. character of buildings and spaces since Through thoughtfully designed and ex- the advent of glazed fenestration. Not ecuted repairs, some historic windows only do windows estab- can realize performance gains that ex- lish the aesthetics and tend their lifespan and improve indoor ambiance of a structure, comfort. However, where deteriora- they form an integral part tion is advanced, or where there is a of the building enclosure. More than ornament, compelling need to modernize the as- windows serve a vital role sembly to meet current performance in protecting the building standards, replacement may be war- from the elements and in ranted. In such cases, careful consider- modulating the transfer of ation of materials and window design heat, moisture, and light is critical to respecting historic char- from exterior to interior. acter while meeting project require- ments. Decisions about wood frames As windows age, their versus metal or composite, insulating components become glazing versus single-pane, true divided subject to the ravages of lights versus applied muntins, and time and weather: sealant historical versus modern anchorage, crumbles, wood decays, Meeting performance demands while preserving building among other considerations, require metal corrodes, glass character presents challenges for historic window projects.
    [Show full text]
  • Copper Roofing: an Enduring Link Between Past and Future
    Volume 15 Number 1 Journal of architectural technology published by Hoffmann Architects, specialists in exterior rehabilitation First Issue 1997 Volume 15 Number 1 Copper Roofing: An Enduring Link Between Past and Future with their standard 20-year warranty. Arthur L. Sanders, AIA Certainly, not all buildings are intended to last more than 30 or 40 years and C ustom-crafted copper roofing, rich may not warrant a copper roof. But in detailing, rich in history, speaks to many are designed for longevity and endurance and long life, its soft blue- merit a roof that will endure equally well. green patina a testament to the passage of time. But as a building material, Without a doubt, copper was and is a copper shouldn’t be relegated to the high initial cost item, typically two or past, despite competition over the past more times the cost of other roofing few decades from lower-cost, pre-formed types, with the exception of slate and metal roofing systems and other roofing tile. This high initial cost was a primary types. If longevity, low maintenance, reason why copper traditionally was and a strong aesthetic statement are a selected only for “important” buildings building owner’s goals, copper remains — public facilities, churches, libraries, the hands-down favorite. and other buildings of long-term value to their owners and their communities. When properly designed, detailed, and That cost came from the high level of installed, a copper roof can easily last craftsmanship required for installation, 50 years or more with relatively little along with the cost of the material itself.
    [Show full text]
  • Avoiding Added Wear and Tęar to Roofing
    Hoffmann Architects Second Issue 1992 Volume l0 Number2 Avoiding Added Wear and Têar to Roofing ln these situations, roof damage occurs Richard P. Kadlubowski when: A hnorgh,today's roofing systems r Roofìng equipment is improperly are highly durable and well-designed installed directly on the roofìng for their pri mary weatherproofìng membrane, without adequate function, they are not usually ìntended securement to the supportive or manufactured to support weìght- su bstructure. bearing loads of either equìpment or foot trafiìc, r Routine maintenance and emer- gency repairs require foot tr affìc All too often, however, the roofìng across inadequately protected system is asked to do justthat, These roof surlaces. secondary uses can play a leading role in shortening a roof 's lifespan and I Accessed and terraced roofs have creating unnecessary maintenance and insuffrcient drainage systems and repair problems, But there are ways to wall<way proteclion, avoid the pitlalls and still reap the added benefìts a roofcan offer beyond Here's a closer lool< at each of these simple protection from the elements, potential problem areas and some recommended solutions for avoiding ln many cases, the roof is the most roof damage, convenient locatìon for HVAC equip- ment, water towers, window washing Rooftop Equipment rigs, and other accessories, such as Whether new construction or retrofìt, satellite dishes and communication proper planning of equipment installa- equipment. Rooß are also used for tion is the fìrst step in minimizing the maintenance access or as terraced potential for long-term roof damage, settings fortenant and public use, Before installing or replacing any equipment, the following questìons should be asl<ed: As Prqect Monoger for Hoffmonn Architects, Mr.
    [Show full text]
  • Is That Traffic Coating Necessary? Surface Treatments and Parking Structure Protection
    ISSUE 2/2008 V O L U M E 2 5 N U M B E R 2 Journal of architectural technology published by Hoffmann Architects, Inc., specialists in the rehabilitation of building exteriors. Is That Traffic Coating Necessary? Surface Treatments and Parking Structure Protection Lawrence E. Keenan, PE, AIA and Robert A. Marsoli, Jr., EIT Elastomeric traffic-bearing mem- there are locations where no mem- branes are showing up on garages brane performs well, such as those old and new, and their popularity has areas requiring a flexible membrane soared in the past decade. A beautiful that are subject to snow plows. coating that locks out harmful moisture So…what is the best solution? It’s and chlorides must be a reasonable helpful to begin by looking at the rea- long-term investment, right? Not only sons why deck protection is necessary. is this not necessarily true, in some cases, applying such coatings can be a The Problem costly mistake. It is true that parking decks must be cared for to ensure that In northern climates, parking decks are they will be here after we are not, but subjected to extreme corrosive and there is a growing preconception that deteriorating environments. Moisture, installing a traffic-bearing membrane is laden with chlorides from deicing a one-way ticket to the garage equiva- chemicals, tracks into garages or hitch- lent of immortality. While a traffic- es a ride as ice formations behind the bearing membrane may, in fact, be the wheels of vehicles (tenderly referred best solution for many situations, this to as “fenderbergs” by those in the re- is a big-ticket item, and thorough con- pair industry) and ultimately soaks into sideration is necessary to determine the concrete surface.
    [Show full text]
  • Copper Roofing
    Hoffmann Architects Journal of architectural technology published by Hoffmann Architects, specìalists in exterior rehabilitation First lssue 1997 Volume l5 Number I Copper Roofing: An Enduring Linl< Between Past and Future with theìr standard 7}-year warranty, Arthur L. Sanders, AIA Certainly, not all buildings are intended to last more than 30 or 40 years and C rrtor-..ufted copper roofìng, rich may not warrant a copper roof But in detailing, rich in history, speal<s to many are designed for longevity and mer- endurance and long life, its soft blue- it a roof that will endure equally well. green patina a testament to the passage of time, But as a building matedal, Without a doubt, copper was and is a copper shouldn't be relegated to the high initial cost item, typically two or past, despite competition overthe past more times the cost of other roolng few decades from lower-cost, pre-formed types, with the exception of slate and metal roofìng systems and other roofìng tile This high initial cost was a primary types. lf longevity, low maintenance, reason why copper traditionally was and a frong aesthetic statement are a selected only for "important" buildings building owner's goals, copper remains - public facilities, churches, libraries, the hands-down favorite. and other buildings of long-term value to their owners and their communities, When properly designed, detailed, and That cost came from the high level of installed, a copper roof can easily last craftsmansh ip required for instal lation, 50 years or more with relatively little along with the cost of the material itself maintenance or care.
    [Show full text]
  • Hoffmann Architects, an Architecture and Engineering Firm Spec
    NEWS Contact Alison Hoffmann 1.800.239.6665 [email protected] www.hoffarch.com HOFFMANN ARCHITECTS ANNOUNCES EIGHT STAFF PROMOTIONS May 2017 – Hoffmann Architects, an architecture and engineering firm specializing in the rehabilitation of building exteriors, is pleased to announce the promotion of eight staff members in three offices. Connecticut office: Robert A. Marsoli, Jr., PE has been promoted to Senior Engineer, in appreciation of his loyalty, technical proficiency, and strong client relationships. Celebrating his tenth anniversary with Hoffmann Architects this past February, Marsoli began his career at the firm in 2007 as a Project Coordinator and was promoted in 2010 to Project Manager. After gaining experience and advanced credentials as a Professional Engineer, he earned a promotion to Project Engineer in 2016. In addition to developing designs for challenging structural engineering projects, he has served over the years as a mentor to emerging Robert A. Marsoli, Jr., professionals, and he has shared his growing expertise by publishing articles on topics PE related to the building envelope. With a civil engineering degree from Northeastern University, Marsoli has provided investigation and design services for clients including Aetna, Yale University, the New York State University Construction Fund, the Hospital of Central Connecticut, and Eversource Energy. He lives in North Haven, Connecticut. Rachel A. Mesite earned a promotion to Senior Finance Coordinator, recognizing her outstanding performance and dependability as a key part of the firm’s financial administration. Since joining the firm in 2015 as Finance Coordinator, Mesite has taken on additional responsibilities and has expanded the role of her position to include Rachel A.
    [Show full text]
  • Troubleshooting the Building Envelope: Addressing CAUSES, Not Symptoms
    ISSUE 2/2002 ■ VOLUME 20 ■ NUMBER 2 Journal of architectural technology published by Hoffmann Architects, specialists in the rehabilitation of building exteriors. Troubleshooting the Building Envelope: Addressing CAUSES, Not Symptoms John J. Hoffmann, FAIA and Russell M. Sanders, AIA he various components of the building and the corrosive impact of acid rain Tenvelope—façades, roofing systems, and de-icing salts. The risk associated windows—and parking structures, plazas/ with deterioration in these structures is terraces/sidewalks, etc., inevitably severe; the threat of costly and time- deteriorate over time. The culprits? Water consuming lawsuits associated with infiltration, thermal expansion and driving and/or tripping hazards, contraction, improper construction and/or unacceptable. substandard materials, structural movement or stress, and age. What To Do When Trouble Strikes Maintenance of the building envelope is critical to preserving not only the structural Water infiltration can be counted on to integrity of a building’s exterior but also to exacerbate building envelope failures. protecting a building’s interior occupied Solutions to building envelope failures spaces; it serves as a barrier from the address CAUSES, not symptoms, and external environment. can be relied upon to keep water out of building envelope components in the Critical to maintaining the building future. envelope is the ability of the facility manager, property manager or building The key to successfully managing the engineer to recognize and address early building envelope is knowing what to indicators of deterioration. Costs do when trouble strikes. Temporary or associated with deferred maintenance cosmetic measures—band-aids, if you increase exponentially over time. The will—inevitably fail.
    [Show full text]