DOCSLIB.ORG

Internal Review of Operations During the 2015–16 Bushfire Season

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Internal Review of Operations During the 2015–16 Bushfire Season Internal review of operations during the 2015–16 bushfire season “A lesson learned isn’t a lesson until it brings about change” Dr Christine Owen Contents Internal review of operations during the 2015–16 bushfire season .................................................. 1 1 Executive summary .............................................................................................................. 4 1.1 The 2015–16 bushfire season in Tasmania ........................................................... 4 1.2 Bushfire management in Tasmania ........................................................................ 4 1.3 About this review ................................................................................................... 5 1.4 About the recommendations .................................................................................. 6 1.5 Summary of recommendations .............................................................................. 7 2 Purpose and scope of review ............................................................................................. 13 2.1 Purpose ............................................................................................................... 13 2.2 Scope .................................................................................................................. 13 3 The 2015–16 bushfire season in Tasmania ........................................................................ 15 3.1 Extreme weather, a record number of fires and an unprecedented response ...... 15 3.2 The firefighting deployment .................................................................................. 16 3.3 Timeline of campaign fires ................................................................................... 16 4 Review method .................................................................................................................. 17 4.1 Project approach .................................................................................................. 17 4.2 Data collection ..................................................................................................... 18 4.3 Data analysis ....................................................................................................... 19 5 Acknowledgments .............................................................................................................. 21 6 Recommendations and context .......................................................................................... 22 6.1 Preparedness ...................................................................................................... 23 6.2 Review of state incident management and arrangements .................................... 26 6.3 Capacity and capability ........................................................................................ 28 6.4 Planning and Incident Action Plans ...................................................................... 32 6.5 Resourcing and resource-tracking ....................................................................... 34 6.6 Communication .................................................................................................... 36 6.7 Air operations ...................................................................................................... 37 6.8 Safety .................................................................................................................. 40 6.9 Interoperability ..................................................................................................... 42 6.10 Local knowledge .................................................................................................. 44 6.11 Communication systems and information technology........................................... 45 6.12 Finance ................................................................................................................ 47 Tasmania Fire Service Page 2 Review of operations during the 2015–16 bushfires 7 Conclusion ............................................................................................................................... 48 Tasmania Fire Service Page 3 Review of operations during the 2015–16 bushfires 1 Executive summary 1.1 The 2015–16 bushfire season in Tasmania The bushfire season in Tasmania between October 2015 and March 2016 elicited a response and commitment that was unprecedented in Tasmanian history. It involved a wide range of emergency management personnel from within Tasmania, other Australian jurisdictions and overseas. This event was unique, in part, because of the number of fires occurring in remote and inaccessible areas requiring fire suppression. 1.2 Bushfire management in Tasmania The agencies most closely involved in bushfire management in Tasmania are Tasmania Fire Service (TFS), Forestry Tasmania (FT) and the Parks and Wildlife Service (PWS). Each of these agencies is represented on the Tasmanian Government’s Multi-Agency Coordination Group (MAC). An Inter-Agency Fire Management Protocol is reviewed each year that is effectively the operating agreement between the three agencies. The protocol underpins the cooperation that exists between the agencies to ensure the suppression and management of bushfire in Tasmania is safe, efficient and cost-effective. Through this arrangement the agencies collaborate in relation to training, identifying and mitigating risk, planned burning operations and suppressing bushfires. Since the 2013 Tasmanian Bushfires Inquiry Report and its subsequent recommendations, these organisations have continued to develop their combined bushfire response capability at both the response and incident management levels. This year, for the first time, the Tasmanian Government’s ‘Tasmanian Interoperability Register’ was activated. This ensured state servants from several government agencies were available to provide surge capacity in support roles, resulting in a whole-of- government response. Agencies included in the register are: • Department of Health and Human Services • Tasmanian Health Service • Department of State Growth, Department of Justice • Department of Police, Fire and Emergency Management (DPFEM) • Department of Premier and Cabinet • Department of Primary Industries, Parks, Water and Environment • Department of Treasury and Finance • Forestry Tasmania (FT) • Department of Education • TasTAFE. Tasmania Fire Service Page 4 Review of operations during the 2015–16 bushfires 1.3 About this review At the end of the 2015–16 bushfire season, TFS, FT and PWS initiated an internal operational review into the season to ensure ongoing continuous improvement in emergency management, particularly the subsequent operational response to fires affecting Tasmanian communities, community and environmental assets, and Tasmania’s longer-term economy. A review team was established that included members from TFS, FT, PWS and the University of Tasmania to manage this internal operations review (the Review). The objective of the Review was to ensure that operational lessons learned during the 2015–16 Tasmanian bushfire season were identified, captured and communicated to Tasmania’s emergency management partners and relevant stakeholders by July 2016. The Review involved: • a survey developed and analysed by Dr Christine Owen that provided all personnel who were involved in the bushfire campaign an opportunity to provide feedback. Christine has extensive experience in research and has worked with the University of Tasmania, the Bushfire and Natural Hazards Co-operative Research Centre and the Australasian Fire and Emergency Services Authorities Council (AFAC) • debriefs with Incident Management Teams throughout Tasmania • debriefs with State Fire Operations Centre personnel • debriefs with personnel from New South Wales, Victoria and Queensland • debriefs with specific functional and support areas • agency-specific debriefs conducted by FT and PWS in all three regions. The information gained has been analysed and collated in the body of this report, and recommendations for action have been identified for the attention of the MAC and TFS Executive Leadership Team. Feedback through the Review has provided valuable insight into the experiences of individuals who were involved in the operational response during this past bushfire season. These insights can help identify the lessons to be learned so we can continue to improve. It should be noted that participants also provided feedback on how we have continued to improve in recent years and identified areas that worked well. Relevant agencies should continue to remind their personnel about the value of their ongoing and outstanding contribution to their organisations and the Tasmanian community. It was recognised that many of the issues that arose this bushfire season could be attributed to the unprecedented scale of the event and the enormity of the response. The focus of the Review has been to proactively research and analyse the lessons that can be learned from collective experience in readiness for any similar events that could occur in the future. As a result, this report focuses on improvements, although the many areas that worked well are also acknowledged. Tasmania Fire Service Page 5 Review of operations during the 2015–16 bushfires 1.4 About the recommendations Overall the Internal Operational Review aligns closely with several recommendations made within the AFAC Independent Operational Review1. The Review acknowledges the many aspects that
Load more

Recommended publications
  • TEXTO.04.Forestfire.Pdf
    DOI: 10.5772/intechopen.72498 Provisional chapter Chapter 1 Ruling Frameworks and Fire Use-Conflicts in Tropical ForestsRuling Frameworks of Chiapas, Mexico: and Fire A Use‐Conflicts Discourse Analysis in Tropical Forests of Chiapas, Mexico: A Discourse Analysis Francisco Guevara-Hernández, FranciscoLuis Alfredo Guevara-Hernández, Rodríguez-Larramendi, LuisFredy Alfredo Delgado-Ruiz, Rodríguez-Larramendi, Julio Díaz-José, FredyRené Pinto-Ruiz,Delgado-Ruiz, Leopoldo Julio Díaz-José, Medina-Sanson, René Pinto-Ruiz, Leopoldo Medina-Sanson, Alejandro Ley-de Coss, Alejandro Ley-de Coss, Rady Alejandra Campos-Saldaña, Rady Alejandra Campos-Saldaña, Luis Reyes-Muro, MiguelLuis Reyes-Muro, Angel Salas-Marina, Miguel Angel Salas-Marina, José Apolonio Venegas-Venegas, Martín de Jesús Ocaña-Grajales, Carlos Ernesto Aguilar-Jiménez, Jesús Ovando-Cruz, DebJesús Raj Ovando-Cruz, Aryal and Vidal Deb Hernández-García Raj Aryal and Vidal Hernández-García Abstract The use of fire within tropical forests to settle agriculture and livestock systems has long been causing a bottle-neck for governmental and environmental development agencies, especially in natural forested areas with local population. An international strategy followed since many years ago is the decree of special territories with vast forests as natural protected areas (NPA). In Mexico, environmental laws can run contrary to customs and practices of natural resource-dependent communities which still use fire to farm their lands as unique livelihood activity. The chapter examines two conflicting frameworks of resource management (forest and soil) and governance in a forest village's efforts to comply with federal policies against fires in a NPA of Chiapas, Mexico. Forest and soil management is a key locus in California village, where gover- nance structures come into conflict with hierarchical State power.
    [Show full text]
  • AFAC Independent Operational Review of the Management of the Tasmanian Fires of January 2016
    AFAC INDEPENDENT OPERATIONAL REVIEW A review of the management of the Tasmanian fires of January 2016 Prepared for Tasmania Fire Service, Forestry Tasmania and Parks and Wildlife Service Tasmania April 2016 ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS The following conducted this Review on behalf of the Australasian Fire and Emergency Service Authorities Council (AFAC): • Assistant Commissioner Tom Dawson – Queensland Fire and Emergency Services • Bob Conroy • Paul Considine – Manager National Resource Sharing Centre, National Aerial Firefighting Centre Overall direction was provided by the AFAC office. The Review team would like to thank those individuals who gave freely of their time and spoke openly with the Review members. The team benefitted from the input of representatives of the Tasmanian fire agencies, representatives of interstate agencies that assisted with the management of the fires, officials from the Tasmanian State Government and representatives of organisations with an interest in promoting the values of the Tasmanian wilderness areas. The manner of participation was supportive of the aim of this Review to establish areas of good practice and identify opportunities for progressive improvement. The input of these individuals in preparing this document was of great benefit to the Review team. However the content of this report and its conclusions remain the joint responsibility of the team. AFAC, April 2016 Copyright © 2016, Australasian Fire and Emergency Service Authorities Council Limited All rights reserved. Copyright in this publication is subject to the operation of the Copyright Act 1968 and its subsequent amendments. Any material contained in this document except the cover photographs can be reproduced, providing the source is acknowledged and it is not used for any commercial purpose whatsoever without the permission of the copyright owner.
    [Show full text]
  • Devil a Tasmanian
    LIFT-OUT: IDENTIFYING HAZARDS AROUND THE HOME BUSH FIREbulletinVOLUME 38 NO 2/2016 THE JOURNAL OF THE NSW RURAL FIRE SERVICE A Tasmanian NSW RFS crews help save devil World Heritage Listed Areas Contents 06 12 18 22 34 Foreword 01 FOREWORD 25 LIFTOUT During the autumn and winter season we saw three times as many incidents 25 Identify and mitigate hazards around than in the same period last year. This relatively high level activity shows just the home how important it is to prepare our communities for any event. The 2016/17 02 IN FOCUS Bush Fire Danger Period has started in some areas and we have seen a number of grassfires. 08 INCIDENTS 30 AWARDS Fire agencies and land managers took advantage of the dry conditions in April 30 St Florian’s Day 2016 and May by implementing a large number of hazard reduction activities right 04 Smoke signals across NSW. A considerable amount of planning and preparation goes into Climate change may impact the timing each of these activities, to ensure they’re safe for the community and also for of hazard reduction burns 34 COMMUNITY ENGAGEMENT the firefighters who are conducting the burns. You may have seen some media coverage about the smoke from these planned hazard reduction activities. 06 A Tasmanian Devil 34 A long engagement – Bonville Brigade We do need to be mindful about the impact of smoke on communities, while maintaining our steady approach to ensuring these important works get done when the conditions are right. I would like to thank all volunteers and crews for 12 RESEARCH 38 FIRE BEHAVIOUR taking advantage of the window of opportunity we’ve had, and also for being 12 Fire behaviour in grass – do we tend to flexible when we have rescheduled activities to limit the smoke impact on 38 Fires in the mallee woodlands communities.
    [Show full text]
  • Post-Disaster Royal Commissions: Lesson-Learning and the Implementation of Recommendations
    POST-DISASTER ROYAL COMMISSIONS: LESSON-LEARNING AND THE IMPLEMENTATION OF RECOMMENDATIONS by Heath Whiley BA (Hons) School of Social Sciences Submitted in fulfilment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy University of Tasmania June 2017 DECLARATION OF ORIGINALITY This thesis contains no material which has been accepted for a degree or diploma by the University or any other institution, except by way of background information and duly acknowledged in this thesis, and to the best of my knowledge and belief no material previously published or written by another person except where due acknowledgment is made in the text of this thesis, nor does this thesis contain any material that infringes copyright Heath Whiley 29th June 2017 ii AUTHORITY OF ACCESS This thesis may be made available for loan and limited copying and communication in accordance with the Copyright Act 1968. iii ABSTRACT Australia’s continued adoption of post-disaster inquiries, specifically royal commissions to investigate and evaluate preparedness, responses and the aftermath of catastrophic disasters suggests it is an appropriate tool for identifying lessons and learning opportunities that mitigate their future impacts. Critiques of the approach question the ability for post-disaster inquiries to create lessons that mitigate future impacts of disasters, and to improve responses, and preparedness through the implementation of their recommendations and findings. Three case studies are used to understand how post-disaster inquiries undertake their investigation: the 2009 Victorian Bushfires Royal Commission, the 2010-11 Queensland Floods Commission of Inquiry, and the 2010-11 Canterbury Earthquakes Royal Commission. This thesis uses these cases to comparatively analyse and evaluate the strengths and weaknesses of royal commissions as a tool for lesson-learning from a disaster.
    [Show full text]
  • NSW Independent Bushfire Inquiry
    Submission to: NSW Independent Bushfire Inquiry Addressed to: [email protected] Submission from: Emergency Leaders for Climate Action (ELCA) https://emergencyleadersforclimateaction.org.au/ Prepared on behalf of ELCA by Greg Mullins AO, AFSM Former Commissioner, Fire & Rescue NSW 15 April 2020 1 About Emergency Leaders for Climate Action Climate change is escalating Australia’s bushfire threat, placing lives, property, our economy and the environment at increasing risk. Emergency Leaders for Climate Action (ELCA) was formed in April 2019 due to shared concerns about the potential of the 2019/20 bushfire season, unequivocal scientific evidence that climate change is the driver of longer, more frequent and more intense bushfire seasons, and the failure of successive governments, at all levels, to take credible, urgent action on the basic causal factor: greenhouse gas emissions from the burning of coal, oil and gas which are causing significant warming, in turn worsening extreme weather events that exacerbate and drive natural disasters such as bushfires. ELCA originally comprised 23 former fire and emergency service leaders from every fire service in Australia, from several State Emergency Service agencies, and from several forestry and national parks agencies. At the time of submission, ELCA continues to grow and now comprises 33 members, including two former Directors General of Emergency Management Australia. Cumulatively, ELCA represents about 1,000 years of experience. Key members from NSW and the ACT include: • Phil Koperberg AO, AFSM, BEM. Former Commissioner NSW Rural Fire Service. Former Chair, NSW State Emergency Management Committee. Former NSW Minister for the Environment. • Greg Mullins AO, AFSM. Former Commissioner Fire & Rescue NSW.
    [Show full text]
  • Losing the World's Heritage
    Losing the world’s heritage – ancient life forms at risk Burnt forest, including rainforest, in canyon, Devils Gullet, Tasmanian Wilderness World Heritage Area, February 2016. Rob Blakers. Submission to the Senate Environment and Communications References Committee on the Tasmanian wilderness bushfires April 2016 The Wilderness Society and Greenpeace acknowledge the traditional Aboriginal owners of all Country in Tasmania and pay respect to elders past and present and the Tasmanian Aboriginal Community. We support efforts to progress reconciliation, land justice and equality. We 1 recognise and welcome actions that seek to better identify, present, protect and conserve Aboriginal cultural heritage, irrespective of where it is located. Submission - Senate Inquiry into bushfires in remote Tasmanian wilderness – April 2016 Inquiry into the response to, and lessons learnt from, recent bushfires in remote Tasmanian wilderness The fires are extremely destructive for two main reasons. First, the fires are threatening vegetation that is unique to Tasmania, including iconic alpine species such as the Pencil Pine and cushion plants, as well as temperate rainforests. Second, the fires are burning up large areas of organic soils upon which the unique Tasmanian vegetation depends. It is extremely unlikely burnt areas with the endemic alpine flora will ever fully recover given the slow growth of these species and the increased risk of subsequent fires given the change to more flammable vegetation and the slow accumulation of peat soils, which takes
    [Show full text]
  • Reducing the Costs and Impacts of Bushfires
    Reducing the costs and impacts of bushfires A report by the Independent Bushfire Group after the Black Summer fires of 2019-2020 July 2020 The Independent Bushfire Group is 12 non-aligned bushfire practitioners, fire managers, land managers, fire researchers and ecologists with over 400 years of collective experience in bushfires, land management and fire ecology across a range of fire landscapes. We focus on practical firefighting issues. A version of this report was submitted to the NSW Independent Bushfire Inquiry in June 2020. This report may be updated from time to time. 1 Table of Contents Preamble ............................................................................................................................................... 3 Summary and Recommendations ........................................................................................................ 4 Introduction ........................................................................................................................................ 11 Part 1 – Causes and Contributing Factors .......................................................................................... 15 1.1 Summary of Fire Studies ......................................................................................................... 15 Part 2 – Preparation and Planning ..................................................................................................... 17 2.1 A Risk-based Approach to Bushfires ......................................................................................
    [Show full text]