GENERAL AGREEMENT on RESTRICTED DS23/R 16 March 1992 TARIFFS and TRADE Limited Distribution

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

GENERAL AGREEMENT on RESTRICTED DS23/R 16 March 1992 TARIFFS and TRADE Limited Distribution GENERAL AGREEMENT ON RESTRICTED DS23/R 16 March 1992 TARIFFS AND TRADE Limited Distribution UNITED STATES - MEASURES AFFECTING ALCOHOLIC AND MALT BEVERAGES Report of the Panei 1. INTRODUCTION 1.1 On 7 March and on 16 April 1991, Canada held consultations with the United States under Article XXIII:1 concerning measures relating to imported beer, wine and cider. The consultations did not result in a mutually satisfactory solution of these matters, and Canada requested the establishment of a GATT panel under Article XXIII:2 to examine the matter (DS23/2 of 12 April 1991). 1.2 At its meeting of 29-30 May 1991, the Council agreed to establish a panel and authorized the Council Chairman to designate the Chairman and members of the Panel in consultation with the parties concerned (C/M/250, page 35). 1.3 The terms of reference of the Panel are as follows: "To examine, in the light of the relevant GATT provisions, the matter referred to the CONTRACTING PARTIES by Canada in document DS23/2 and to make such findings as will assist the CONTRACTING PARTIES in making the recommendations or in giving the rulings provided for in Article XXIII:2.* The parties subsequently agreed that the above terms of reference should include reference to documents DS23/1, DS23/2 and DS23/3 (DS23/4). 1.4 Pursuant to the authorization by the Council, and after securing the agreement of the parties concerned, the Chairman of the Council notified the following composition of the Panel on 8 July 1991 (DS23/4): Chairman: Mr. Julio Lacarte-Muro Members: Ms. Yvonne Choi Mr. Ernst-Ulrich Petersmann 1.5 The Panel met with the Parties on 1-2 October and 2 December 1991. The delegations of Australia, EEC and New Zealand were heard by the Panel on 2 October 1991. The Panel submitted its report to the Parties to the dispute on 7 February 1992. 92-0296 DS23/R Page 2 2. FACTUAL ASPECTS 2.1 The current regulatory structure in the United States alcoholic beverages market arose from the repeal of the Eighteenth Amendment to the United States Constitution, which had established Prohibition. The Twenty-first Amendment to the United States Constitution, adopted in 1933, repeals the Eighteenth Amendment and furthermore provides that: "The transportation or importation into any State, Territory, or possession of the United States for delivery or use therein of intoxicating liquors, in violation of the laws thereof, is hereby prohibited." Shortly thereafter, Congress enacted the Federal Alcohol Administration Act which requires, among other things, that all wholesalers obtain basic federal permits, and prohibits suppliers from having an interest in retail outlets and from engaging in many of the commercial practices that were associated with the "tied house' prior to Prohibition. In addition, the Federal government imposes excise taxes on alcoholic beverages. 2.2 Each state has independent legislative and regulatory authority, and, in response to the Twenty-first Amendment, each of the states has enacted laws governing the basis on which alcoholic beverages can be sold. In addition 'o regulating the sale and distribution of alcoholic beverages within their border for social welfare purposes, states impose excise taxes on alcoholic beverages. All states adopted a three tier system under which the production, wholesale distribution and retail sale of alcohol are kept separate. Some states provide an exception to certain in-state breweries and wineries. Products 2.3 The measures before the Panel apply to beer, wine and cider. Beer is defined under the 1991 United States Internal Revenue Code (Subpart D, s 5052, Subtitle E) as *beer, ale, porter, stout and other similar fermented beverages (including sake similar product) of any name or description containing one-half of one per cent or more of alcohol by volume, brewed or produced from malt, wholly or in part, or from any substitute thereof. Beer is classified under tariff item 2203.00.00 in the United States Tariff Schedule XX as 'Beer made from malt' and the rate is bound at 1.6 cents a litre. 2.4 Natural wine is defined under Subtitle E of the Internal Revenue Code (section 5381) as I... the product of the juice or must of sound ripe grapes or other sound ripe fruit made with such cellar treatment as may be authorized and containing more than 21 per cent of weight by total solids., Wine is classified under tariff item 2204 with various subitems depending on type, alcohol content and type of container. The rates are bound on all the listed items. 2.5 Cider is considered as wine under the Internal Revenue Code. The tax measures on wine under the Code apply also to 'All cider except for cider DS23/R Page 3 produced with apples in a place other than a bonded wine cellar and without the use of preservatives" (Section 5042). Cider is described in the United States Tariff Schedule XX (tariff item 2206.00.15) as cider whether still or sparkling", and the rate is bound at 0.4 cents a litre. Canada has initial negotiating rights with respect to this concession. 2.6 The matters before the Panel concern the following federal and state practices with respect to beer, wine and cider: Federal Excise Tax 2.7 The Omnibus Budget Reconciliation Act of 1990 ("the Act") increased the excise tax on beer from $9 to $18 per barrel. The Act leaves unchanged the existing lower rate of $7 per barrel, however, for the first 60,000 barrels produced by United States breweries with annual production not exceeding 2 million barrels. This lower rate is not available for imported beers. 2.8 The provisions of the Act also increased excise taxes on wine by $0.90 per wine gallon. but introduced for the first time a credit for wine of small United States producers. The Act provides a credit of up to $0.90 per wine gallon for wine produced at qualified facilities in the United States by United States producers of not more than 250,000 wine gallons per year. The credit is provided on a sliding scale basis, depending on actual levels of production. The maximum credit of 90 cents per wine gallon is allowed on the first 100,000 wine gallons of wine for consumption or sale. The credit is reduced by 1 per cent for each 1,000 wine gallons of wine produced in excess of 150,000 wine gallons of wine during the calendar year. This credit is not available for imported wines. The Act provides that the credit is allowable at the time the tax is payable as if the credit constituted a reduction in the rate of the tax. 2.9 The Act increased the excise tax on wine held in stock for sale by $9 per wine gallon. The Act provides, however, for wine produced by small United States producers that the tax increase shall be reduced by the credit provided for small United States producers as described above. No reduction is available for imported wine. State Excise Tax Measures 2.10 Several states provide an excise tax differential based on annual production. The states of New York and Rhode Island, and the Commonwealth of Puerto Rico, provide an excise tax exemption or lower rate of tax for a specified quantity of beer brewed by in-state breweries. In the state of Oregon, an excise tax exemption is applied for a limited quantity of wine sold by United States producers manufacturing less than 100,000 gallons per year of alcoholic beverages. 2.11 In the states of Kentucky, Minnesota, Ohio and Visconsin, an excise tax credit based on annual production is available for specified quantities of beer sold by brewers whose annual production does not exceed an indicated level. In Kentucky and Ohio, the credit is available only to in-state breweries. DS23/R Page 4 2.12 In Alabama, Georgia, Nebraska and New Mexico, the excise tax rate is based on the origin of the product. These states provide for a lower rate of taxation, or a tax exemption, for wine produced by in-state or domestic wineries. Iowa applies an excise tax at the wholesale level; only native wines' may be sold directly at retail, where no excise tax is applied. 2.13 Michigan, Ohio and Rhode Island determine the excise tax treatment based on the use of local ingredients. A lower tax rate is applied in the state of Mississippi to wines in which a certain variety of grape has been used. 2.14 The state of Pennsylvania provides a tax credit on the purchase of equipment for the production of beer to domestic breweries not exceeding a specified size. 2.15 Table 1 summarizes the differential excise tax measures applied by various states. State Distribution Requirements 2.16 Many states regulate the distribution of alcoholic beverages, including beer and wine, to points of sale. Such regulations may limit the right to import beer and wine to alcoholic beverage boards, manufacturers, licensed importers, or to wholesalers. Further restrictions are usually applied with respect to which entities can qualify to receive importer, wholesaler or retailer licenses. In-state manufacturers of beer and wine may, in some states, sell directly to retailers. Table 2 presents the distribution requirements of thirty states. Use of Common Carrier Requirements 2.17 Several states impose restrictions on the transportation system that can be used for the delivery of beer and wine. In particular, certain states require that alcoholic beverages be shipped into the state by common carriers. A common carrier is defined as one that undertakes to carry the goods of all persons indifferently or of all who choose to employ it.
Recommended publications
  • OARDC HCS 0491.Pdf (7.500Mb)
    PROCEEDINGS SHO Horticulture Department Series 491 January 1980 OHIO AGRICULTURAL RESEARCH ~~W' WOOSTER, 0 CONTENTS Page No. The Effective Use of Fungicides for Controlling Grape Diseases 1 by M. A. Ell is The Grape Industry in Virginia 4 by E.L. Phillips , Developing a Wine Industry in Mississippi.............................. 8 by R.P. Vine, B.J. Stojanovic, C.P. Hegwood, Jr., J.P. Overcash and F.L. Shuman, Jr. Use of Methiocarb in Ohio Grapes •...................................... 12 by R.N. Williams Maintaining Correct Levels of Free Sulfur Dioxide in Wines 14 by J.F. Ga11ander and J.R. Liu Centrifugation of Musts and Wines 18 by F. Krampe Microbiological Testing for Predicting Wine Stability 24 by A. Haffenreffer Importance of Determining Volatile Acidity in Wines 26 by J.F. Gallander Preliminary Observations of Cluster-Thinning and Shoot-Tip Removal On 'Seyval' Grapevines, by G.R. Nonnecke 29 Concepts of Making Red Table Wines 32 by R.P. Vine Environment and the Variety............................................ 38 by E. L. Ph i 11 i ps Integrated Pest Management and You ~................ 44 by F. R. Ha 11 A Progress Report on the Effects of Rootstocks on Five Grape Cultivars.. 49 by G.A. Cahoon and D.A. Chandler PREFACE Approximately 150 persons attended the 1980 Ohio Grape-Wine Short Course, which was held at the Fawcett Center for Tomorrow, The Ohio State University, Columbus, Ohio, on January 29-30. Those attending were from 9 states not including Ohio and represented many areas of the grape and wine industry. This course was sponsored by the Department of Horticulture, The Ohio State University, in coopera­ tion with Ohio Agricultural Research and Development Center, Ohio Cooperative Ex­ tension Service and Ohio Wine Producers Association.
    [Show full text]
  • MEASURES AFFECTING ALCOHOLIC and MALT BEVERAGES Report of the Panel Adopted on 19 June 1992
    16 March 1992 UNITED STATES - MEASURES AFFECTING ALCOHOLIC AND MALT BEVERAGES Report of the Panel adopted on 19 June 1992 (DS23/R - 39S/206) 1. INTRODUCTION 1.1 On 7 March and on 16 April 1991, Canada held consultations with the United States under Article XXIII:1 concerning measures relating to imported beer, wine and cider. The consultations did not result in a mutually satisfactory solution of these matters, and Canada requested the establishment of a GATT panel under Article XXIII:2 to examine the matter (DS23/2 of 12 April 1991). 1.2 At its meeting of 29-30 May 1991, the Council agreed to establish a panel and authorized the Council Chairman to designate the Chairman and members of the Panel in consultation with the parties concerned (C/M/250, page 35). 1.3 The terms of reference of the Panel are as follows: "To examine, in the light of the relevant GATT provisions, the matter referred to the CONTRACTING PARTIES by Canada in document DS23/2 and to make such findings as will assist the CONTRACTING PARTIES in making the recommendations or in giving the rulings provided for in Article XXIII:2." The parties subsequently agreed that the above terms of reference should include reference to documents DS23/1, DS23/2 and DS23/3 (DS23/4). 1.4 Pursuant to the authorization by the Council, and after securing the agreement of the parties concerned, the Chairman of the Council notified the following composition of the Panel on 8 July 1991 (DS23/4): Chairman: Mr. Julio Lacarte-Muro Members: Ms.
    [Show full text]
  • Abruzzan Wine Cluster Advancement Through Trans-National Cooperation and Entrepreneurship
    University of Mississippi eGrove Honors College (Sally McDonnell Barksdale Honors Theses Honors College) 2010 Hood Imports: Abruzzan Wine Cluster Advancement Through Trans-National Cooperation and Entrepreneurship Stewart Jennings Hood Follow this and additional works at: https://egrove.olemiss.edu/hon_thesis Recommended Citation Hood, Stewart Jennings, "Hood Imports: Abruzzan Wine Cluster Advancement Through Trans-National Cooperation and Entrepreneurship" (2010). Honors Theses. 2029. https://egrove.olemiss.edu/hon_thesis/2029 This Undergraduate Thesis is brought to you for free and open access by the Honors College (Sally McDonnell Barksdale Honors College) at eGrove. It has been accepted for inclusion in Honors Theses by an authorized administrator of eGrove. For more information, please contact [email protected]. ACKNOWLEDGMENTS This success of this thesis could not have been accomplished without the help of countless individuals. 1 would like to thank John Samonds, Debra Young, William D'Alonzo, Angela Tumini, John Juergens, Michael Harvey, Luca and the entire Ciscato, Rossetti and D'Alonzo families, Raimondi Stefano, Maria D'Alessio, Guiseppe Cavaliere, Dirk Robertson, Fausto Emilio Albanesi, Emanuele Altieri, my friends and family, and all of the winemakers in Abruzzo, Italy. 1 would also like to thank Jim Barksdale for his generous contributions and fellowship grant, which made this whole project and travel to Italy possible. Lastly, I would like to give a special thanks to my advisor and mentor, Christian Sellar. Without his expertise and continuous patience and enthusiasm this paper would never have gotten off the ground. 11 ABSTRACT Hood Imports: Abruzzan Wine Cluster Advancement Through Trans-National Cooperation and Entrepreneurship [Under the Direction of Dr.
    [Show full text]
  • Wine Institute Records on the American Wine Industry D-242
    http://oac.cdlib.org/findaid/ark:/13030/c8cn79j1 No online items Inventory of the Wine Institute Records on the American Wine Industry D-242 Liz Phillips University of California, Davis Library, Dept. of Special Collections 2019 1st Floor, Shields Library, University of California 100 North West Quad Davis, CA 95616-5292 [email protected] URL: https://www.library.ucdavis.edu/archives-and-special-collections Inventory of the Wine Institute D-242 1 Records on the American Wine Industry D-242 Language of Material: English Contributing Institution: University of California, Davis Library, Dept. of Special Collections Title: Wine Institute Records on the American Wine Industry Creator: Wine Institute (San Francisco, Calif.) Identifier/Call Number: D-242 Physical Description: 205.6 linear feet Date (inclusive): 1838-2012 Date (bulk): 1930-2000 Abstract: The Wine Institute Records on the American Wine Industry includes winery survey data, county records, and regional growing histories; wine lists and menus; wine labels; speeches by wine scholars, producers and writers; promotional materials; materials related to wine and popular culture; photographs; film and video; and a small amount of microfilm containing biographies of wine industry leaders, winery information, historical data, and surveys. Researchers should contact Archives and Special Collections to request collections, as many are stored offsite. History The Wine Institute was established in 1934 to serve as a lobbying, promotional, and educational organization for the wine industry. Membership consists of California grape growers and wine makers. Scope and Content The collection includes winery survey data, county records, and regional growing histories; wine lists and menus; wine labels; speeches by wine scholars, producers and writers; promotional materials; materials related to wine and popular culture; photographs; film and video; and a small amount of microfilm containing biographies of wine industry leaders, winery information, historical data, and surveys.
    [Show full text]