DOCSLIB.ORG

DATE: August 4, 2016 MEDIA CONTACT for IMMEDIATE RELEASE Amy Hood Getty Communications (310) 440-6427 [email protected]

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
DATE: August 4, 2016 MEDIA CONTACT for IMMEDIATE RELEASE Amy Hood Getty Communications (310) 440-6427 Ahood@Getty.Edu NEWS FROM THE GETTY news.getty.edu | [email protected] DATE: August 4, 2016 MEDIA CONTACT FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE Amy Hood Getty Communications (310) 440-6427 [email protected] GETTY RESEARCH INSTITUTE ACQUIRES MOST IMPORTANT COLLECTION OF LATE 19th and EARLY 20th CENTURY GERMAN WORKS ON PAPER IN PRIVATE HANDS, INCLUDING THE DEFINITIVE COLLECTION OF WORK BY KÄTHE KOLLWITZ Outbreak, working proof for sheet 5 of the Peasants’ War series 1902/03. Käthe Kollwitz, (German, 1867– 1945). Gray wash and white heightening, etching, drypoint, aquatint, lift ground, soft-ground etching, textile, and transfer screen. Getty Research Institute, Los Angeles The Dr. Richard A. Simms Collection comes to the GRI as a partial donation and includes 654 prints and drawings by Kollwitz and artists in her circle such as Max Klinger, Emil Nolde, and George Grosz LOS ANGELES – The Getty Research Institute (GRI) announced today the acquisition and partial donation of a major collection of works on paper accumulated by Page 2 internationally renowned collector Dr. Richard A. Simms. This collection, assembled over 40 years, was built around Simms’ abiding interest in German artist Käthe Kollwitz (1867-1945) and includes artists in her orbit – Max Klinger (1857-1920), Emil Nolde (1857-1956), Otto Greiner (1869-1916), Ludwig Meidner (1884-1996), and George Grosz (1893-1959). The gift portion of this collection represents the largest donation of graphic art received by the J. Paul Getty Trust. In conjunction with the GRI acquisition, the J. Paul Getty Museum has received as a gift from Dr. Simms the drawing Study for Heinrich von Kleist’s Broken Jug, 1876, by Adolph Menzel (1815-1905). This donation celebrates the work of recently retired Senior Curator of Drawings Lee Hendrix. “Käthe Kollwitz is one of Germany’s most important artists and her accomplishments in the graphic arts and sculpture are extraordinary. These facts are generally not so well known or appreciated in the US. With the unique combination of prints, working proofs, and drawings that focus on Kollwitz’s early career, Dr. Simms assembled a study collection showing precisely how she came to represent a defining moment in European printmaking. They are a substantial addition to the Getty Research Institute’s Special Collections,” said Thomas W. Gaehtgens, director of the GRI. “The Simms collection now counts as one of the most significant acquisitions of graphic art in the US and abroad. We are deeply grateful to Dr. Simms, not only for his extraordinary gift, and his foresight in building this unparalleled collection, but also for his long and fruitful relationship with the Getty. As founding chair of the GRI’s donor council, he has been a crucial partner in building our drawings and prints collections for the better part of two decades.” Kollwitz was one of the great draftsmen and printmakers of the modern period, which is evident in the 41 drawings and 236 etchings, woodcuts, and lithographs collected by Simms. Many of the prints are working proofs, unfinished prints upon which she worked out an evolving composition in pencil, gouache, and chalk. If the Simms collection consisted only of Kollwitz’s masterpieces, it would be unparalleled in the US; but because Simms wanted to see Kollwitz in a broader context, he became a self-taught expert of the period and strategically assembled a coherent group of related works by her contemporaries, including a remarkable collection of 175 prints and 7 drawings by Klinger, who inspired Kollwitz to reject painting and devote herself to printmaking; prints and drawings by her second teacher Karl Stauffer-Bern (1857- 1891); and works by German Expressionists such as Ernst Barlach (1870-1938), whose woodcuts she admired; and Grosz, whose acerbic social commentary echoed Kollwitz’s own perspective. Simms’ interest in Kollwitz and the social and artistic milieu of late 19th and early 20th-century Germany led him to supplement his research -more- Page 3 library with letters by Kollwitz, Greiner, Klinger, and others, all of which are included in the donation. “Kollwitz’s name invokes unforgettable images of the human condition—of war, protests, suffering, solidarity, familial bonds, mourning, and social justice expressed by powerful representations of the human body: mothers and children, men and boys hitched to ploughs, mourners on a battlefield, and uncompromising self- portraits,” said Louis Marchesano, curator of prints and drawings at the Getty Research Institute. “That the Whetting of the Scythe, sheet 3 of the Peasants’ War humanism of these images both documents series, 1905. Käthe Kollwitz (German, 1867–1945). Etching, drypoint, aquatint, sandpaper, and soft-ground and transcends the social and political etching. Getty Research Institute, Los Angeles upheavals of the early 20th century is well known, but because Kollwitz adhered to a staunchly figurative art in an era headed toward abstraction, and because she was a woman in a field dominated by men, her name recognition in the US isn’t what it should be.” “Four decades ago when I began collecting,” said Dr. Richard Simms, “I was moved by Kollwitz’s images of the downtrodden, victims of war, and the underclass. But, I quickly understood that she was as dedicated to the artistic process as she was to humanism and social justice. I saw Kollwitz’s genius in the chalk, pencil, and wash emendations that cover the numerous working proofs I collected. This is why I pursued the greatest drawings, proofs, and finished prints at a time when these objects were still on the market. I wanted to build a masterpiece study collection that would encourage us to explore the depth of her thought, technique, and creativity. And I am convinced that the best place to carry out this exploration is at the Getty Research Institute.” According to Marchesano, “what Dr. Simms understood about Kollwitz before most other collectors and scholars is that she managed to be an artist of the people, an artistic virtuoso admired by the most discerning collectors, and an artist’s artist. It is rather remarkable that she was able to move forward as she did without compromising her art or her political and social convictions.” Käthe Kollwitz was born in 1867 in Königsberg, Germany (now Kaliningrad, Russia). Her father, the architect Karl Schmidt, encouraged her to pursue a career in art, which she began by training in Munich and Berlin. In the 1880s, she was directly -more- Page 4 influenced by Max Klinger’s prints and his tract Malerei und Zeichnung (Painting and Drawing), which convinced her to give up painting and devote her energies to the graphic arts. Her earliest surviving prints and drawings, important examples of which were acquired by Simms, date from around 1890. These include unflinching self- portraits as well as the remarkable study for her first important print Scene from Zola’s Germinal (1891). During the next 15 years, she experimented with printmaking techniques and consolidated her Ploughers with Woman, a drawing of an early, rejected version of sheet 1 for the Peasants’ War series, 1905. Käthe Kollwitz (German, 1867– reputation as one of history’s finest 1945). Chalk and white heightening. Getty Research Institute, Los printmakers with two cycles, Ein Angeles Weberaufstand (A Weaver’s Revolt, 1897) and the Bauernkrieg (Peasants’ War, 1908). The undeniable power of the Peasants’ War intaglio series is brought into relief with the Simms collection’s preparatory drawings, proof impressions, and rejected compositions all of which document not only the evolution of individual images but also the general shift in her style away from a late 19th-century naturalism populated by incidental details toward a monumental figurative art informed by a sculptural sensibility. The earliest composition which definitively marks Kollwitz’s departure from German naturalism is the famous Frau mit totem Kind (Woman with Dead Child, 1903), of which Simms collected not only extraordinary impressions, but also a heavily worked preparatory drawing on two sheets. The monumental, sculptural effects found here were reinforced in 1904 when Kollwitz lived in Paris. There she trained as a sculptor while experiencing the overwhelming influence of French Modernism, proof of which is offered by the single most critical drawing of this period, again in the Simms collection, the large Seated Nude Woman. With continued success, her experiments in etching, lithography, and woodcut were well received. In 1919, she became the first woman admitted to the Berlin Akademie der Künste. In 1920, she published the impressive Gedenkblatt für Karl Liebknecht (Memorial sheet for Karl Liebknecht). Considered amongst the best of her mid-career, the sheet commemorates the death of Liebknecht, who was murdered along with fellow communist Rosa Luxembourg. The Simms collection includes an impressively large preparatory drawing, a version printed from a copperplate which -more- Page 5 Kollwitz rejected, and proof impressions of the final woodcut, as well as a sketch of the dead Liebknecht, who was drawn by Kollwitz at the request of the victim’s family. In 1933, Kollwitz was expelled from the academy because of her support for an anti-Nazi petition in 1932. Her later work became less concerned with the kind of specific subjects that dominated the early part of her career in which Simms was most interested. Not unlike Rembrandt, what occupied Kollwitz throughout her life in print and drawing was self-portraiture—with images that range from an artist of youth and vigor who had just begun to explore the world, to a wizened, undefeated witness of modernity’s horrors. Dr. Richard A. Simms became the founding chair of the Getty Research Institute’s Council in 2006 and a member of the Getty Museum’s Disegno Group in 2012. He has given significantly to both programs, including important works by Félix Vallotton, James Ensor, Giovanni Battista Piranesi, and František Kupka.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Hausenstein's Klee in the Year 1921, in His Book Kairuan, Oder Eine
    Charles W. Haxthausen Paul Klee, Wilhelm Hausenstein, and «the Problem of Style» Guten Tag, Monsieur Ich, was haben Sie heute für eine Krawatte umgebunden? möchte man manchmal einem «Kunstwerk» zu- rufen. Paul Klee, Tagebücher, 1906 Hausenstein’s Klee In the year 1921, in his book Kairuan, oder eine Geschichte vom Maler Klee und von der Kunst dieses Zeitalters, the eminent German art critic Wilhelm Hausenstein de- clared his subject the quintessential artist of his era. Yet his reasons made the honor an ambiguous one: Wir […] sind in die Epoche des Anarchischen und der Disgregation eingetreten. […] Der Malerzeichner Klee nahm von der Zeit, was sie war. Er sah, was sie nicht war; sah ihr Va- kuum, ihre Sprünge; sah ihre Ruinen und saß über ihnen. Sein Name bedeutet kein Sys- tem. Seine Kunst ist irrational, selbst in der raffiniertesten Überlegung naiv, ist der uner- hörten Verwirrung des Zeitalters hingegeben.1 Such gloomy words seem strangely discordant with our image of Klee. They must have seemed especially incongruous when read alongside the artworks illustrat- ing Hausenstein’s book. For most of us familiar with Klee’s art, his name evokes humor and charm, fantasy and poetry, witty and evocative titles, aesthetic en- chantment, delights for the mind as well as the eye—not «Sprünge» and «Ruinen», not anarchy and disintegration. What «Verwirrung» was Hausenstein talking about? To be sure, the confusion of modernity was by then a well-estab- lished trope, yet if we read Hausenstein’s previous writing we will see that he had something more specific in mind. The symptom of the confusion of the age was the confusion of styles, and that confusion was manifest in Klee’s art more than in any other.
    [Show full text]
  • The University of Chicago Objects of Veneration
    THE UNIVERSITY OF CHICAGO OBJECTS OF VENERATION: MUSIC AND MATERIALITY IN THE COMPOSER-CULTS OF GERMANY AND AUSTRIA, 1870-1930 A DISSERTATION SUBMITTED TO THE FACULTY OF THE DIVISION OF THE HUMANITIES IN CANDIDACY FOR THE DEGREE OF DOCTOR OF PHILOSOPHY DEPARTMENT OF MUSIC BY ABIGAIL FINE CHICAGO, ILLINOIS AUGUST 2017 © Copyright Abigail Fine 2017 All rights reserved ii TABLE OF CONTENTS LIST OF MUSICAL EXAMPLES.................................................................. v LIST OF FIGURES.......................................................................................... vi LIST OF TABLES............................................................................................ ix ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS............................................................................. x ABSTRACT....................................................................................................... xiii INTRODUCTION........................................................................................................ 1 CHAPTER 1: Beethoven’s Death and the Physiognomy of Late Style Introduction..................................................................................................... 41 Part I: Material Reception Beethoven’s (Death) Mask............................................................................. 50 The Cult of the Face........................................................................................ 67 Part II: Musical Reception Musical Physiognomies...............................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Morton Review
    REVIEWS: Eighteenth- and Nineteenth-Century Literature and Culture 549 Morton, Marsha. Max Klinger and Wilhelmine Culture. On the Threshold of German Modernism. Farnham: Ashgate, 2014. 434 pp. £80.00 (hardcover). Max Klinger’s (1857–1920) life-size, polychrome marble sculpture of Ludwig van Beet- hoven formed the centerpiece of the 14th Vienna Secession Exhibition in 1902. In many ways, the exhibition wasasmuch a celebration ofthe Leipzig artist asit wasofthe great composer. By this point in time, Klinger had reached the zenith of his international fame as a modern artist and yet, his art historical position soon started to become increasingly precarious—especially after his death in 1920. Although his drawings and print cycles continued to enter private and public collections (especially in the United States), Klinger’s idiosyncratic realism—especially in his paintings—posed an insurmountable challenge to post-war formalism and abstraction. Klingerwasvirtuallyforgottenuntilthe1960sand1970s,whenaseriesofexhibitionsandpub- lications gradually generated renewed interest. Since then, Klinger slowly made his way back into the “story of modern art” but most of the scholarship continues to be offered in German. Marsha Morton’s 2014 publication under review here changes this unsatisfactory situation and makes a significant intervention not only in Klinger scholarship but also in the study of late nineteenth-century German art and culture more generally. Morton’s book is so multi-faceted that this short review cannot do it justice. But her key thesis is constructed around Klinger’s evocative visual engagement with the disquieting psy- chological undercurrents of modern urban life. This analytical emphasis on the psychological rather than an exclusively formalist modernism is part of a broader shift in the literature (the work of Debora L.
    [Show full text]
  • The Silverman Collection
    Richard Nagy Ltd. Richard Nagy Ltd. The Silverman Collection Preface by Richard Nagy Interview by Roger Bevan Essays by Robert Brown and Christian Witt-Dörring with Yves Macaux Richard Nagy Ltd Old Bond Street London Preface From our first meeting in New York it was clear; Benedict Silverman and I had a rapport. We preferred the same artists and we shared a lust for art and life in a remar kable meeting of minds. We were more in sync than we both knew at the time. I met Benedict in , at his then apartment on East th Street, the year most markets were stagnant if not contracting – stock, real estate and art, all were moribund – and just after he and his wife Jayne had bought the former William Randolph Hearst apartment on Riverside Drive. Benedict was negotiating for the air rights and selling art to fund the cash shortfall. A mutual friend introduced us to each other, hoping I would assist in the sale of a couple of Benedict’s Egon Schiele watercolours. The first, a quirky and difficult subject of , was sold promptly and very successfully – I think even to Benedict’s surprise. A second followed, a watercolour of a reclining woman naked – barring her green slippers – with splayed Richard Nagy Ltd. Richardlegs. It was also placed Nagy with alacrity in a celebrated Ltd. Hollywood collection. While both works were of high quality, I understood why Benedict could part with them. They were not the work of an artist that shouted: ‘This is me – this is what I can do.’ And I understood in the brief time we had spent together that Benedict wanted only art that had that special quality.
    [Show full text]
  • Surreal Visual Humor and Poster
    Fine Arts Status : Review ISSN: 1308 7290 (NWSAFA) Received: January 2016 ID: 2016.11.2.D0176 Accepted: April 2016 Doğan Arslan Istanbul Medeniyet University, [email protected], İstanbul-Turkey http://dx.doi.org/10.12739/NWSA.2016.11.2.D0176 HUMOR AND CRITICISM IN EUROPEAN ART ABSTRACT This article focused on the works of Bosh, Brughel, Archimboldo, Gillray, Grandville, Schön and Kubin, lived during and after the Renaissance, whose works contain humor and criticism. Although these artists lived in from different cultures and societies, their common tendencies were humor and criticism in their works. Due to the conditions of the period where these artists lived in, their artistic technic and style were different from each other, which effected humor and criticism in the works too. Analyzes and comments in this article are expected to provide information regarding the humor and criticism of today’s Europe. This research will indicate solid information regarding humor and tradition of criticism in Europe through comparisons and comments on the works of the artists. It is believed that, this research is considered to be useful for academicians, students, artists and readers who interested in humour and criticism in Europe. Keywords: Humour, Criticism, Bosch, Gillray, Grandville AVRUPA SANATINDA MİZAH VE ELEŞTİRİ ÖZ Bu makale, Avrupa Rönesans sanatı dönemi ve sonrasında yaşamış Bosch, Brueghel, Archimboldo, Gillray, Grandville, Schön ve Kubin gibi önemli sanatçıların çalışmalarında görülen mizah ve eleştiri üzerine kurgulanmıştır. Bahsedilen sanatçılar farklı toplum ve kültürde yaşamış olmasına rağmen, çalışmalarında ortak eğilim mizah ve eleştiriydi. Sanatçıların bulundukları dönemin şartları gereği çalışmalarındaki farklı teknik ve stiller, doğal olarak mizah ve eleştiriyi de etkilemiştir.
    [Show full text]
  • Inspiration Beethoven
    DE | EN 08.12.2020–05.04.2021 INSPIRATION BEETHOVEN EINE SYMPHONIE IN BILDERN AUS WIEN 1900 PRESSEBILDER | PRESS IMAGES 01 01 CASPAR VON ZUMBUSCH CASPAR VON ZUMBUSCH 1830–1915 1830–1915 Reduktion des Denkmals für Ludwig van Beethoven, 1877 Reduction of the memorial to Ludwig van Beethoven, 1877 Bronze, 53 × 24 × 27 cm Bronze, 53 × 24 × 27 cm Belvedere, Wien Belvedere, Vienna Foto: Belvedere, Wien Photo: Belvedere, Vienna 02 02 GUSTAV KLIMT GUSTAV KLIMT 1862–1918 1862–1918 Schubert am Klavier. Schubert at the Piano. Entwurf für den Musiksalon im Palais Dumba, 1896 Study for the music room in Palais Dumba, 1896 Öl auf Leinwand, 30 × 39 cm Oil on canvas, 30 × 39 cm Privatsammlung/Dauerleihgabe im Leopold Museum, Wien Private Collection/Permanent Loan, Leopold Museum, Vienna Foto: Leopold Museum, Wien/Manfred Thumberger Photo: Leopold Museum, Vienna/Manfred Thumberger 03 03 JOSEF MARIA AUCHENTALLER JOSEF MARIA AUCHENTALLER 1865–1949 1865–1949 Elfe am Bach. Für das Beethoven-Musikzimmer Elf at the Brook. For the Beethoven Music Room der Villa Scheid in Wien, 1898/99 of Villa Scheid in Vienna, 1898/99 Öl auf Leinwand, 176,5 × 88,3 cm Oil on canvas, 176,5 × 88,3 cm Andreas Maleta, aus der Victor & Martha Thonet Sammlung, Andreas Maleta, from the Victor & Martha Thonet Collection, Galerie punkt12, Wien gallery punkt12, Vienna Foto: amp, Andreas Maleta press & publication, Wien, 2020 Photo: amp, Andreas Maleta press & publication, Vienna, 2020 04 04 JOSEF MARIA AUCHENTALLER JOSEF MARIA AUCHENTALLER 1865–1949 1865–1949 Elfenreigen. Für das Beethoven-Musikzimmer
    [Show full text]
  • Nineteenth & Early Twentieth Century German & Austrian
    NINETEENTH & EARLY TWENTIETH CENTURY! GERMAN & AUSTRIAN! PAINTINGS, DRAWINGS & SCULPTURE! SEPTEMBER 21ST - OCTOBER 20TH, 2010! SHEPHERD & DEROM! GALLERIES! © Copyright: Robert J. F. Kashey! for Shepherd Gallery, Associates, 2010! COVER ILLUSTRATION: see entry for Károly Alexy.! TECHNICAL NOTES: All measurements are approximate and in inches and in centimeters; height precedes width. All drawings, prints, and photographs are framed. Prices on request. All works subject to prior sale.! NINETEENTH & EARLY TWENTIETH CENTURY! GERMAN & AUSTRIAN! PAINTINGS, DRAWINGS & SCULPTURE! September 21st through October 20th, 2010! Exhibition organized by! Robert Kashey and David Wojciechowski! Catalog by Jennifer Spears Brown! SHEPHERD & DEROM! GALLERIES! 58 East 79th Street! New York, N.Y. 10075! Tel: 212 861 4050! Fax: 212 772 1314! [email protected]! www.shepherdgallery.com! NINETEENTH & EARLY TWENTIETH CENTURY! GERMAN & AUSTRIAN! PAINTINGS, DRAWINGS & SCULPTURE! September 21st through October 20th, 2010! Shepherd Gallery is pleased to present Nineteenth & Twentieth Century German and Austrian Paintings, Drawings & Sculpture. We have showcased art from this region since 1969 when we mounted our first exhibition exclusively devoted to German-speaking artists. This exhibition, drawn from the gallery’s stock, coincides with German Master Drawings from the Wolfgang Ratjen Collection, 1580 – 1900, at the National Gallery of Art, Washington, D.C. A broad range of works include oil paintings by Anton Einsle and Max Klinger, works on paper by Carl Agricola,
    [Show full text]
  • De Chirico, Böcklin and Klinger 51
    ADRIANO ALTAMIRA: DE CHIRICO, BÖCKLIN AND KLINGER 51 DE CHIRICO, BÖCKLIN AND KLINGER Adriano Altamira In 1920 Giorgio de Chirico wrote two short essays on Böcklin and Klinger, which he published respectively in the months of May and November, in Milan, in the magazine «Il Convegno». It is not necessary to underline that these are two of the artists that de Chirico loved best, and in whose work he found not only an important source of incentive for his own artistic training, as he has always been the first to admit, but also ideas and references which return frequently in his subsequent painting. Wieland Schmied, among others, has convincingly argued that de Chirico, Italian by blood if not by birth place, had learnt to “read” Italy through the eyes of artists of German tongue – like Böcklin and Klinger – while he derived the idea of the Italian Piazza through read- ing Friedrich Nietzsche. Thanks to these influences de Chirico rediscovers his ideal Italy, and per- haps even Greece as the cradle of myth. The influence of Böcklin is clearly noticeable in the initial phase of de Chirico’s art, as in fact is that of Klinger: for example in the battles and tales of centaurs, a theme explored by both. It later returns in a clearly visible manner in the neo-romantic period which begins immediately after the First World War. On closer inspection, however, influences from both artists return continually, sometimes years apart and in the most differing periods: in the metaphysical period, in several mythological themes, pre- or post-metaphysical, in the Mysterious Baths series, and in several other topoi which are less easy to define.
    [Show full text]
  • Ovid's Metamorphoses in Twentieth-Century Italian Literature
    Ovid’s Metamorphoses in Twentieth-Century Italian Literature ed. by Alberto Comparini Alessandro Giammei 129 Alessandro Giammei Massimo Bontempelli’s Re-Inventions. Magism, Metaphysics, and Modern(ist) Mythology A significant portion of this book is focused on authors that many textbooks in- clude in the so called ‘Italian Surrealism,’ a cluster of literary and artistic trends that actually started before the birth of Surrealism, was largely anti-Surrealist, and must be considered from a less Franco-centric perspective.1 This essay ad- dresses the influence of Ovid on a specific and central niche of that prismatic phenomenon. I will discuss, in particular, Massimo Bontempelli’s Magismo, an original thread of a global modern literary poetics: Magic (or Magical) Realism.2 From the Twenties up to the end of World War II, Bontempelli’s inventions and theories developed in parallel and in contrast with the evolution of French Surre- alism. They were also nourished by the de Chirico brothers’ metaphysical aes- thetics, which, along with Futurism, was the most influential Italian contribution to modern Western art. My analysis will therefore also pay special attention to de Chirico’s uses of Ovid in the years in which his rapport with Bontempelli was more significant. I hypothesize that, besides occasional references and direct homages, Ovid is a crucial model for the ambition that informed the Realismo Magico: that of turning literature into a form of magic, and modern stories into new classical myths.3 I will offer a brief historical account of the cultural genealogy that made Ovid relevant to the Magismo as a master of two specific traits, imagination and irony, and I will discuss the role of this influence in the wider frame of Italy’s controversial return to order.
    [Show full text]
  • Birth of Modernism
    EN OPENING MARCH 16TH BIRTH OF (Details) Wien Museum, © Leopold Werke: Moriz Nähr ÖNB/Wien, Klimt, Weitere Gustav Pf 31931 D (2). MODERNISM PRESS RELEASE VIENNA 1900 BIRTH OF MODERNISM FROM 16TH MARCH 2019 The exhibition Vienna 1900. Birth of Modernism has been conceived as the Leopold Muse- um’s new permanent presentation. It affords insights into the enormous wealth and diver- sity of this era’s artistic and intellectual achievements with all their cultural, social, political and scientific implications. Based on the collection of the Leopold Museum compiled by Ru- dolf Leopold and complemented by select loans from more than 50 private and institutional collections, the exhibition conveys the atmosphere of the former metropolis Vienna in a unique manner and highlights the sense of departure characterized by contrasts prevalent at the turn of the century. The presentation spans three floors and features some 1,300 exhibits over more than 3,000 m2 of exhibition space, presenting a singular variety of media ranging from painting, graphic art, sculpture and photography, via glass, ceramics, metals, GUSTAV KLIMT textiles, leather and jewelry, all the way to items of furniture and entire furnishings of apart- Death and Life, 1910/11, reworked in 1915/16 ments. The exhibition, whose thematic emphases are complemented by a great number of Leopold Museum, Vienna archival materials, spans the period of around 1870 to 1930. Photo: Leopold Museum, Vienna/ Manfred Thumberger UPHEAVAL AND DEPARTURE IN VIBRANT FIN-DE-SIÈCLE VIENNA At the turn of the century, Vienna was the breeding ground for an unprecedentedly fruitful intellectual life in the areas of arts and sciences.
    [Show full text]
  • Schoenberg and the Gesamtkunstwerk Path to Abstraction By
    Schoenberg and the Gesamtkunstwerk Path to Abstraction by John Blythe A thesis submitted to the University of Birmingham for the degree of MA by Research in the History of Art Dept. of Art History, Curating and Visual Studies, College of Arts and Law, University of Birmingham. February 2019. University of Birmingham Research Archive e-theses repository This unpublished thesis/dissertation is copyright of the author and/or third parties. The intellectual property rights of the author or third parties in respect of this work are as defined by The Copyright Designs and Patents Act 1988 or as modified by any successor legislation. Any use made of information contained in this thesis/dissertation must be in accordance with that legislation and must be properly acknowledged. Further distribution or reproduction in any format is prohibited without the permission of the copyright holder. To the technicians Tom and Marlowe Contents Lists of Figures Lists of Illustrations Introduction page 1 Schoenberg’s First Exhibitions page 3 Review of literature page 14 National Gallery Exhibition page 20 Berlinische Exhibition page 27 Richard Gerstl page 29 Schoenberg’s Jewish Antecedents page 35 Research Methodology page 43 Thesis Structure page 51 Chapter 1 Schoenberg’s fin-de-siècle Vienna and Harmonielehre. page 53 The Discourse on Synaesthesia in fin-de-siècle Vienna page 53 Austrian culture and politics page 56 Origins of Viennese Discourse on Synaesthesia page 60 A Widening Discourse page 66 Schoenberg’s Harmonielehre page 76 Honoré de Balzac’s Seraphita page 90 Summary page 92 Chapter 2: First Triad – Wagner, Schopenhauer and Schoenberg. page 94 Gesamtkunstwerk page 94 Overtones to the First Triad page 116 Gurrelieder, a new redemption page 125 Summary page 128 Chapter 3: Second Triad and the Idea of Language.
    [Show full text]
  • Max Klinger10
    The Comedy of Modern Art 55 MAX KLINGER10 Granting that future men, free from emulation, from envy, from love and hate, not within themselves, but toward others, as to be more level judges of our matters, than our contemporaries are. Giacomo Leopardi, Parini’s Discourse on Glory Preliminary Toughts Germany is situated in the middle of Europe. Such a fate has raised a barrier between it and the countries of the Mediterranean and the East. Whereas the extreme perimeters of Italy and France almost touch, the former Greece and the latter Africa, Germany cannot feel the spirit of these countries or experience their torrid or refreshing winds, except through the forests and mountains surrounding it from the West and the East. Whether this circumstance has a benefcial or harmful infuence on the intellectual manifestations of the country, on the works of its best artists, is something we are going to look at in the present study. We can begin by observing that Greece’s infuence, initially on the Romans and later on the Italian Renaissance, was more of form than of spirit. In fact, as far as I know, there is not a single Italian poet, philosopher, painter or sculptor who was “moved” by the mystery of Greece. I do not say this as a reproach to my compatriots, who were and are moved (I would at least hope this is the case for the moderns) by other mysteries, those of our own country and of our own race, which are in no way inferior to those which arose from the art, forms or thought of the Hellenic peninsula.
    [Show full text]