DOCSLIB.ORG

Charles I, Emperor of Austria | International Encyclopedia of The

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Charles I, Emperor of Austria | International Encyclopedia of The Version 1.0 | Last updated 19 August 2015 Charles I, Emperor of Austria By Robert Rill Habsburg-Lothringen, Karl Franz Joseph Ludwig Hubert Georg Otto Marie (Károly IV, King of Hungary) Archduke, General, Austrian Emperor, Politician Born 17 August 1887 in Persenbeug, Austria Died 01 April 1922 in Quinta do Monte, Funchal, Portugal In his youth, the archduke was introduced to the idea of federalism by Archduke Franz Ferdinand. During the first part of World War I, he became a skillful military leader without any political influence. The young emperor’s two main aims, the reform of the Austrian Constitution and an acceptable peace, proved to be out of reach. Nevertheless, he consistently refused to resign and died in exile. Table of Contents 1 Youth and Education 2 Military Career and Engagement during World War One 3 Succession to the Throne 4 The Struggle for Peace 5 Final Efforts and Exile Selected Bibliography Citation 1. Youth and Education Archduke Karl Franz Joseph (1887-1922) was born on 17 August 1887 in the Castle of Persenbeug. His grandfather, Charles Louis, Archduke of Austria (1833-1896) was the brother of Franz Joseph I, Emperor of Austria (1830-1916). His father, Otto Franz, Archduke of Austria (1865-1906), had married Maria Josepha, Princess of Saxony (1867-1944), in 1877, who was strongly committed to Charles I, Emperor of Austria - 1914-1918-Online 1/5 the Catholic education of her children. Therefore, Godfried Marschall (1840-1911), later suffragan bishop, was selected as the teacher for religious education, and Onno Klopp (1822-1903), a conservative Catholic refugee from Prussian-occupied Hannover, who continually published writings against Prussian expansionism, became Charles’ teacher of history. Moreover, in 1906, the successor to the throne, Franz Ferdinand, Archduke of Austria-Este (1863-1914), became Charles’ guardian and succeeded in inspiring him with enthusiasm for his own ideas for profound reform of the constitution. These were based to a certain extent on federalism, but also on the strengthening of conservative monarchic principles. Additionally, Charles was sent to the famous Viennese secondary school “Schottengymnasium” to acquire some expertise in scientific subjects. 2. Military Career and Engagement during World War One Charles’ career as an officer of the Austro-Hungarian Army started in 1903, when he became a Lieutenant in the Regiment of Lancers (Ulanen-Regiment) Nr. 1; having transferred to the Dragoons (Dragoner-Regiment) Nr. 7 in 1905, he advanced to the rank of First Lieutenant in 1906, and Captain in 1909. Then he transferred to the infantry (Regiment Nr. 39), became a major, and, on 1 May 1914, a lieutenant colonel. After some training in the general staff and after 28 June 1914, the new successor to the throne, now a colonel, served as liaison officer to the German army in Galicia. In July 1915, he was promoted to the rank of major general, and in March 1916, to field marshal lieutenant. In spring 1916, he took part in the successful Austrian offensive in South Tyrol. In spring 1915, the German army used gas on the Western Front, which proved to guarantee quick advancement with a minimum of German casualties. In June 1916, the Austrian army decided to use this rather new weapon, too, on the Italian Front. Contemporaries, but also historians, had already criticized Charles’ role when it came to the use of gas, in particular, that he did nothing to stop it. In summer 1916, Charles became general of cavalry and on 1 November 1916, three weeks before ascending the throne of the Empire, he was promoted to the ranks of colonel general and great admiral. 3. Succession to the Throne When Franz Joseph died on 21 November 1916, Charles succeeded to the Austrian and Hungarian thrones and immediately assumed the title of supreme commander of the Empire’s forces, in an attempt to diminish the overwhelming German influence in their joint warfare. He and his wife, Zita, consort of Charles I, Emperor of Austria (1892-1989), were crowned King and Queen of Hungary on 30 December 1916. Thus, he was obliged to accept the political system of dualism, but, on the other hand, this system enabled him to demand universal suffrage in the Hungarian kingdom. During the two years of his regency, he was occupied with various attempts to conclude a peace treaty, even accepting serious sacrifices concerning the territorial integrity of the Austro-Hungarian Monarchy, like ceding parts of Tyrol to Italy. The most famous of these secret negotiations for a peace compromise is known as the Sixtus Affair, which – finally brought into focus by the Minister of Foreign Affairs Ottokar Graf Czernin (1872-1932) - caused the disastrous decline of independent Charles I, Emperor of Austria - 1914-1918-Online 2/5 Austro-Hungarian foreign politics and warfare. 4. The Struggle for Peace It was in spring 1915 that the archduke proposed, for the first time, to deliver Alsace-Lorraine to France. Soon afterwards, he supported diplomatic efforts to keep Italy out of the war by means of territorial concessions. In August 1917, the Austrian diplomat Nikolaus Graf Revertera von Salandra (1866-1951) negotiated with officers of the French general staff about a separate Austro-Hungarian peace treaty, which also gave Great Britain the opportunity to present its conceptions of post-war Europe. At the same time, Pope Benedict XV (1854-1922) called for peace without any annexations and contributions. Although Charles promised to enter into an exchange of views about the future of South Tyrol with Italy, Germany refused any discussion on withdrawal from Belgium or negotiation about a cession of Alsace-Lorraine, even after Charles had offered Austrian Silesia as the utmost compensation for those territories indispensably demanded by France. 5. Final Efforts and Exile As for interior affairs, Charles tried to stop the increasing famine by founding the Ministry of Social Welfare (1917) and the Ministry of Public Health (1918). In August 1918, he ordered Heinrich Lammasch (1853-1920) and Johannes Andreas von Eichhoff (1871-1963) to draft a new constitution based on the idea of an Austrian Commonwealth of Nations (Staatenbund). On 16 October 1918, he declared a new federalist constitution by himself which, because of the armistice on 3 November 1918 and the foundation of the Austrian republic on 12 November 1918, never came into force. On 11 November 1918, influenced by his Minister Ignaz Seipel (1876-1932) and the Archbishop of Vienna, Friedrich Gustav Piffl (1864-1932), Charles renounced any participation in government. After the armistice, the Austrian parliament demanded his abdication, which was refused by the emperor, who retired to Swiss exile on 23 March 1919. He stayed in Rorschach and Pragins, before twice moving to Hungary to push for restoration (in March and October 1921). But as he did not want to provoke a civil war after Regent Miklós Horthy (1868-1957) refused to hand over power, he was forced to give up those efforts. The first attempt at restoration started on 26 March 1921. Having secretly negotiated with the French Prime Minister Aristide Briand (1862–1932), Charles believed that France would support him against menacing interventions from Hungary's neighbors. Charles managed to travel to Szombathely for preliminary negotiations with the Hungarian Prime Minister Pál Teleki (1879-1941). On the next day, he succeeded in meeting Regent Miklós Horthy in the Castle of Budapest, but even after an emotional two-hour discussion, Horthy refused to hand over power to the king, with the argument that this would necessarily lead to a civil war. Despite this, Charles stayed in Szombathely until 5 April 1921, expecting Horthy to change his mind. Disappointed he then returned to Switzerland. On 20 October 1921, accompanied by his wife Zita, Charles tried again, having landed near Sopron Charles I, Emperor of Austria - 1914-1918-Online 3/5 with a small airplane. Without intending to seek compromise with Horthy, he formed a provisional government. Supported by Hungarian legitimist politicians and officers, and parts of the army, Charles tried to march to Budapest. Horthy made a military proclamation that he would retain power and demanded loyalty from his army. On 23 October, the legitimists arrived at Budaörs, a village close to the capital. The following confrontation might have led to civil war. Nineteen victims remained on the battlefield, dead. To avoid further bloodshed, Charles reluctantly agreed to armistice negotiations. He then dictated a surrender order. Together with his family, he was sent into exile on the island of Madeira, where he died on 1 April 1922 as a result of pneumonia. In 1954, the process of beatification was initiated. Fifty years later, on 3 October 2004, he was beatified by Pope John Paul II (1920-2005). Robert Rill, Austrian State Archives and War Archive Austria Section Editor: Tamara Scheer Selected Bibliography Broucek, Peter: Karl I. (IV.). der politische Weg des letzten Herrschers der Donaumonarchie, Vienna 1997: Böhlau. Demmerle, Eva: Kaiser Karl I. 'Selig, die Frieden stiften-'. Die Biographie, Vienna 2004: Amalthea. Feigl, Erich: 'Gott erhalte-' Kaiser Karl. persönliche Aufzeichnungen und Dokumente, Vienna 2006: Amalthea. Kovać s, Elisabeth: Untergang oder Rettung der Donaumonarchie? 2 volumes, Vienna 2004: Böhlau. Mikrut, Jan (ed.): Kaiser Karl I. (IV.) als Christ, Staatsmann, Ehemann und Familienvater, Vienna 2004: Dom. Citation Rill, Robert: Charles I, Emperor of Austria , in: 1914-1918-online. International Encyclopedia of the First World War, ed. by Ute Daniel, Peter Gatrell, Oliver Janz, Heather Jones, Jennifer Keene, Alan Kramer, and Bill Nasson, issued by Freie Universität Berlin, Berlin 2014-10-08. DOI: 10.15463/ie1418.10703. License This text is licensed under: CC by-NC-ND 3.0 Germany - Attribution, Non-commercial, No Derivative Works. Charles I, Emperor of Austria - 1914-1918-Online 4/5 Charles I, Emperor of Austria - 1914-1918-Online 5/5.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • O Du Mein Österreich: Patriotic Music and Multinational Identity in The
    O du mein Österreich: Patriotic Music and Multinational Identity in the Austro-Hungarian Empire by Jason Stephen Heilman Department of Music Duke University Date: _______________________ Approved: ______________________________ Bryan R. Gilliam, Supervisor ______________________________ Scott Lindroth ______________________________ James Rolleston ______________________________ Malachi Hacohen Dissertation submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy in the Department of Music in the Graduate School of Duke University 2009 ABSTRACT O du mein Österreich: Patriotic Music and Multinational Identity in the Austro-Hungarian Empire by Jason Stephen Heilman Department of Music Duke University Date: _______________________ Approved: ______________________________ Bryan R. Gilliam, Supervisor ______________________________ Scott Lindroth ______________________________ James Rolleston ______________________________ Malachi Hacohen An abstract of a dissertation submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy in the Department of Music in the Graduate School of Duke University 2009 Copyright by Jason Stephen Heilman 2009 Abstract As a multinational state with a population that spoke eleven different languages, the Austro-Hungarian Empire was considered an anachronism during the age of heightened nationalism leading up to the First World War. This situation has made the search for a single Austro-Hungarian identity so difficult that many historians have declared it impossible. Yet the Dual Monarchy possessed one potentially unifying cultural aspect that has long been critically neglected: the extensive repertoire of marches and patriotic music performed by the military bands of the Imperial and Royal Austro- Hungarian Army. This Militärmusik actively blended idioms representing the various nationalist musics from around the empire in an attempt to reflect and even celebrate its multinational makeup.
    [Show full text]
  • Austria-Hungary 1914: Nationalisms in Multi- National Nation-State Anthony M
    Comparative Civilizations Review Volume 72 Article 8 Number 72 Spring 2015 4-1-2015 Austria-Hungary 1914: Nationalisms in Multi- National Nation-State Anthony M. Stevens-Arroyo [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: https://scholarsarchive.byu.edu/ccr Recommended Citation Stevens-Arroyo, Anthony M. (2015) "Austria-Hungary 1914: Nationalisms in Multi-National Nation-State," Comparative Civilizations Review: Vol. 72 : No. 72 , Article 8. Available at: https://scholarsarchive.byu.edu/ccr/vol72/iss72/8 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the All Journals at BYU ScholarsArchive. It has been accepted for inclusion in Comparative Civilizations Review by an authorized editor of BYU ScholarsArchive. For more information, please contact [email protected], [email protected]. Stevens-Arroyo: Austria-Hungary 1914: Nationalisms in Multi-National Nation-State Comparative Civilizations Review 99 Austria-Hungary 1914: Nationalisms in a Multi-National Nation-State Anthony M. Stevens-Arroyo [email protected] “Austria is disunity and partition into petty states, darkness, Jesuitism, reaction and the whorish way of doing things of the patriarchal rule of the police.” - Ludwig Bamberger, Radical German émigré, 1859 “We shall have a little parliamentarianism, but power will remain in my hands and the whole thing will be adapted to Austrian realities.” - Emperor Frantz Josef, 1861 “…civilized states by and large have adopted that organization which, in the whole continent, rests on historical foundations only in Hungary.” - Ernő Nagy, Nagyvárad Law School Professor, 1887 Introduction “Austria is disunity and partition into petty states, darkness, Jesuitism, reaction and the whorish way of doing things of the patriarchal rule of the police,” wrote Ludwig Bamberger, an early radical, in 1859.
    [Show full text]
  • Hungarian Nationalist Narratives and Public Memory of Francis Joseph
    Bridge Over Troubled Waters: Hungarian Nationalist Narratives and Public Memory of Francis Joseph Thesis Presented in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree Master of Arts in the Graduate School of The Ohio State University By Thomas Andrew Szigeti, B.A. Graduate Program in History The Ohio State University 2015 Thesis Committee: Steven Conn, Advisor David Hoffman Jessie Labov Copyright by Thomas Andrew Szigeti 2015 Abstract This thesis explores nationalist narratives and public memory of Francis Joseph and the Habsburg era in Hungary. In this work, Budapest’s Liberty Bridge serves as a lens and reference point of sorts in my examination of nationalist historical narratives and public memory of Francis Joseph and the era of the Dual Monarchy in Hungary. In particular, this paper will trace the way in which ruling governments have attempted to impose their own versions of history onto the public spaces of Budapest and into the minds of their citizens. Beginning with the years following the 1848 revolution, this thesis looks at changes in the memory of Francis Joseph during the Dual Monarchy, the Horthy era, and the Socialist era, ending with a discussion of Francis Joseph in modern Hungarian society. In Budapest, the reason that the Liberty Bridge never regained its pre-Socialist era name is due to a lack of popular positive memory of Francis Joseph, in contrast to several other important Hungarian historical figures. In the contested field of Hungarian national narrative the memory of Francis Joseph never truly found its place; for while he did gain a significant degree of popularity in the later decades of his reign, Hungary’s longest-ruling monarch never gained a place in the country’s imagination.
    [Show full text]
  • Franz Joseph Utilised?
    Franz Joseph utilised? Why the concept of Kaisertreue in the Austro-Hungarian Empire should be reinterpreted from an anational and national perspective based on two Kaiserreisen to Galicia in 1880 and 1894 N.J. Bakhuis – Prof. Dr. M.K. Baár 1 Franz Joseph utilised? Franz Joseph utilised? Why the concept of Kaisertreue in the Austro-Hungarian Empire should be reinterpreted from an anational and national perspective based on two Kaiserreisen to Galicia in 1880 and 1894 By Niels J. Bakhuis The image on the cover is of emperor Franz Joseph I. of Austria-Hungary (1830 (r. 1848) -1916) as he was presented on the front page of: Die Neue Zeit Nr. 197 (28-08-1880), 1. Used with permission from the Haus-, Hof- und Staatsarchiv, see: HHStA Neuere Zeremonialakten (NZA) Karton 367. 2 Franz Joseph utilised? Contents Acknowledgement .................................................................................................................................. 4 Abstract ................................................................................................................................................... 5 Introduction ............................................................................................................................................ 6 Note on terminology and geographic names .................................................................................... 10 1. Historiography .................................................................................................................................. 11 1.1
    [Show full text]
  • 30722 Hon. Emanuel Cleaver
    30722 EXTENSIONS OF REMARKS, Vol. 153, Pt. 22 November 8, 2007 and without penalty to purchase long-term march through the bitter, piercing cold of win- INTRODUCTION OF LEGISLATION care insurance. The government does have an ter. Major Watson was stronger than most TO PROVIDE FEDERAL TAX RE- important role to play in encouraging higher and, when necessary, carried his fellow pris- LIEF TO RECIPIENTS OF DIS- utilization of long-term care insurance. oners on his back to keep them from being BURSEMENTS FROM THE HOKIE During Long-Term Care Awareness Week, I summarily executed. While at ‘‘Camp 2,’’ our SPIRIT MEMORIAL FUND would encourage all citizens interested in re- man from Missouri fixed a sawmill for his tirement planning to visit North Korean captors with the ultimate plan to HON. RICK BOUCHER www.longtermcare.gov, where the government make bunk beds for his fellow POWs in order OF VIRGINIA hosts a national clearinghouse for long-term that they no longer had to sleep on the cold, IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES dirt floor. He succeeded in making 300-bunk care information. Thursday, November 8, 2007 f beds and saved many lives in the process. Ul- timately, the prisoners were returned to the Mr. BOUCHER. Madam Speaker, I am HONORING MAJ WILLIAM C. WAT- Chinese, under whose control Major Watson pleased today to join with my colleagues from SON FOR HIS TIRELESS PATRI- spent the remainder of his 837 days in cap- Virginia, Mr. GOODLATTE, Mr. CANTOR, Mr. OTISM AND UNRELENTING HER- tivity. SCOTT, and Ms. DRAKE in introducing legisla- OISM Forever dedicated to our Nation, Major Wat- tion to exclude from Federal income taxes dis- son chose to remain in the military after the bursements from the Hokie Spirit Memorial HON.
    [Show full text]
  • The Czechs and the Lands of the Bohemian Crown
    7 Reform, Revolution, and Reaction The accession of Charles VI’s daughter, Maria Theresa—the first woman to reign over the Czechs since the legendary Libusˇe—marked another watershed in the development of the Bohemian crownlands and the Habsburg monarchy. The power of the Bohemian Estates had been bro- ken after the White Mountain, but the institutions of the Estates monar- chy had continued to exist, even if in attenuated form. With the loss of Spain in 1714, the center of gravity of the Habsburg realm shifted to Central Europe. But it was under Maria Theresa (1740–1780) that con- certed and continuous efforts began to forge a unified, centralized, bu- reaucratically administered realm at least out of the non-Hungarian pos- sessions of the monarch.1 For the remainder of the monarchy’s existence the Bohemian crownlands would be treated more or less as one province among many.2 At the outset, however, it seemed more likely that the monarchy itself would melt down altogether in the crucible of war into which Frederick II of Prussia plunged it a scant two months after Charles VI’s death. .......................... 10888$ $CH7 08-05-04 15:18:41 PS PAGE 83 84 THE CZECHS THE BOHEMIAN CROWNLANDS IN THE WARS OF THE EIGHTEENTH CENTURY (1740–1790) In December 1740, Prussia invaded Silesia, a Bohemian crown- land since John of Luxemburg, defeated the Austrian armies, and occu- pied most of the province. Frederick’s victory spawned a coalition of Charles Albert of Bavaria, Frederick Augustus III of Saxony and Poland, and Philip V of Spain, supported by his French nephew, Louis XV, each of whom had designs on the Habsburg inheritance.
    [Show full text]
  • Austria-Hungary
    AUSTRO-HUNGARIAN TREATY, 1875 His Majesty the Emperor of Austria, King of Bohemia etc. and Apostolic King of Hungary on the one part and His Majesty the King of the Kingdom of the Hawaiian Islands on the other part, Being equally animated by the desire of regulating and extending the commercial relations, and of promoting the facilities of navigation between Their respective States and Possessions, have resolved to conclude a Treaty for that purpose and have named for their Plenipotentiaries that is to say: His Imperial and Royal Apostolic Majesty, the Count Frederick Ferdinand de Beast, His Imperial and Royal Majesty’s Chamberlain, Privy Councilor, Ambassador Extraordinary at the Court of St. James, Grand Cross of the Order of St. Stephen, and of that of Leopold etc. and His Majesty the King of the Kingdom of the Hawaiian Islands, Manley Hopkins, Esq., His Hawaiian Majesty’s Charge d’affaires and Consul General in London, Knight Commander of the Order of Kamehameha I and of Isabella la Catolica, who after having communicated to each other their respective full powers found to in due and proper form, have agreed upon and concluded the following articles. ARTICLE I. There shall be perpetual peace and friendship between the Austro-Hungarian Emperor and the Kingdom of the Hawaiian Islands, and between the citizens of the two Countries, without exception of person and place. ARTICLE II. There shall be between the Austro-Hungarian Empire and the Kingdom of the Hawaiian Islands reciprocal freedom of commerce and navigation, and the citizens of the Austro-Hungarian Empire in the Hawaiian Islands, and Hawaiians within the Empire of Austria-Hungary may enter with their Vessels and Cargoes into all places, ports and rivers, which are or shall hereafter be open to foreign commerce, with the same liberty and security as are or may be enjoyed by the native of the each country respectively, always provided, that the Police Regulations established for the preservation of peace and good order shall be duly respected.
    [Show full text]
  • The Emperor Karl
    THE EMPEROR KARL THE EMPEROR KARL by ARTHUR COUNT POLZER-HODITZ Translated from tile GermatJ by D. F. <['AI 'I and F. S. F LIN'l' "Fate shuffles the cards and we play" SCHOPENHAUER PUTNAM LONDON & NEW YORK FutsT ENousa EDITION OcToBER. 1930 PRJJITED IJI GllEAT BRJTAIJII'. CRISWICI[ PllESS: CHAilLES WHITTINGHAM AND GllJGGS (PRI!"ERS), LTD. TOOitl COUilT1 CHANCI!IlY LANE, LONDOJII'. CONTENTS PAGE INTRODUCTION I CHAPTER I. AusTRIA-HuNGARY AND ITs MoRTAL DISEASE 9 I. The super-national imperial idea of the Hapsburgs.-The national State idea of the Hohenzollerns. II. The Austrian collective State idea-the germ of dualism. -State federalism or centralization.-The physical defect of the Monarchy.-The Imperial idea and the Magyars.-Mistaken course of the Germans in Austria.-Palacky's proJ;>hetic warning.­ Slav ambitions inspired by Hungary's example. III. The Germans in alliance with the Magyars.-The national­ ities question in Austria.-The key to its solution in Hungary.­ The nationalities and the Hungarian national State. IV. The equal treatment of Austria and Hungary.-Tisza, the champion of dualism.-A reorganization of the Monarchy during the World War a necessity.-The failure of the Emperor Karl's e~or~. ' CHAPTER II. MY RELATIONS WITH THE ARCHDUKE KARL FRANZ JosEPH BEFORE HE BECAME EMPEROR 37 I. The Archduke Karl at Brixen.-At Reichenau and Het­ zendorf.-Bestowal of the Order of the Golden Fleece.-At Miramar.-The Archduchess Maria Josepha.-The Archduke Ludwig Salvator.-The beginning of the Archduke Karl's military service.-His study of political science at Prague.-His majority.­ Johann Orth still alive in 1907.-Gloomy forebodings.-A protest.
    [Show full text]
  • Germany 1818–1848
    Germany 1818–1848 In the person of Louis XVIII the dynasty returnedtoFrance which had governed the country since the 16th century.Through the peace of Paris of May1814the great powers confirmed the territorial extension the monarchyhad possessed at its fall in 1792.The Kinghimself emphasized the uninterrupted existenceof the monarchysince Saint-Louis, and Jacques-Claude Beugnot equated the impo- sition of the Charte constitutionnelle with the bestowal of privileges by the French Kingsofthe Middle Ages. As to the restoration in Germanythe contemporaries could scarcelyhavefound adequate parallels in history and onlyinasmall num- ber of cases was there aquestion of reinstatement of dynasties. There had been no revolution and if monarchies had disappeared, it wasdue to the influenceof Napoleon and was carried through by wayofinternational treaties and Imperial legislation. The imposition of constitutions since 1814served to consolidatemo- narchies which in many cases had greatlyexpanded at the Napoleonic period. To the majorityofthe citizens of Baden, for example, Grand Duke Charles Frederick was anew monarch. The sameistrue for agreat manycitizens of Bavaria and Württembergand their rulers. The inhabitants of the formerecclesiastical terri- tories on the Rhine were, in one blow,transformed into subjects of the protestant house of Hohenzollern. In the German states restoration aimed less at areturn to the past than at the consolidation of divine right monarchyinthe present.Not- withstanding the undeniable attemptsatceremonial and ideological revival of historical memories the policy of restoration sought in the first place to meet the requirements of the future. After the fall of Napoleon, Europe was in need of political stability and of securitiesagainst acontinuation of war and revolu- tion.
    [Show full text]
  • EIGHTEENTH- and NINETEENTH-CENTURY CORONATIONS and INAUGURATIONS in the HABSBURG MONARCHY Why Do Th Ey Matter? D
    Introduction EIGHTEENTH- AND NINETEENTH-CENTURY CORONATIONS AND INAUGURATIONS IN THE HABSBURG MONARCHY Why Do Th ey Matter? d Klaas Van Gelder Royal rites and ceremonies appeal very strongly to the imagination of people worldwide. Millions of tourists gaze at the St. Edward’s Crown, the Imperial State Crown, and the other regalia in the London Tower each year. Many peo- ple know the scenes of Elizabeth II’s coronation in 1953, which are frequently shown in the media. Documentary fi lms such as Th e Coronation by BBC One, broadcast in May 2018 on the occasion of the sixty-fi fth jubilee of the crowning and featuring the Queen reminiscing about her father’s and her own coronation, only add to the appeal of these rare events. Th e same allure can be observed in the case of the imperial crowns in Vienna’s Schatzkammer and the St. Stephen’s Crown of Hungary in the parliament building in Budapest—the latter referred to as the embodiment of “the constitutional continuity of Hungary’s statehood and the unity of the nation” in the country’s “fundamental law” dating from 2011.1 Analogously to popular fascination, scholarly interest in rituals accompanying and substantiating the start of a new reign—and more generally in symbolic communication—has increased steadily over the past three to four decades. New insights into the signifi cance of ritual and ceremony for power relations have in- duced new generations of historians and art historians to reconsider coronations More than Mere Spectacle Coronations and Inaugurations in the Habsburg Monarchy during the Eighteenth and Nineteenth Centuries Edited by Klaas Van Gelder https://www.berghahnbooks.com/title/VanGelderMore 2 | Klaas Van Gelder and inaugurations.
    [Show full text]
  • The Austro-Hungarian Army and the Question of Decline and Fall Kyle D
    Claremont Colleges Scholarship @ Claremont CMC Senior Theses CMC Student Scholarship 2013 Indivisible and Inseparable: The Austro-Hungarian Army and the Question of Decline and Fall Kyle D. Woods Claremont McKenna College Recommended Citation Woods, Kyle D., "Indivisible and Inseparable: The Austro-Hungarian Army and the Question of Decline and Fall" (2013). CMC Senior Theses. Paper 593. http://scholarship.claremont.edu/cmc_theses/593 This Open Access Senior Thesis is brought to you by Scholarship@Claremont. It has been accepted for inclusion in this collection by an authorized administrator. For more information, please contact [email protected]. CLAREMONT McKENNA COLLEGE INDIVISIBLE AND INSEPARABLE: THE AUSTRO-HUNGARIAN ARMY AND THE QUESTION OF DECLINE AND FALL SUBMITTED TO PROFESSOR HEATHER FERGUSON AND DEAN GREGORY HESS BY KYLE D. WOODS FOR SENIOR THESIS SPRING 2013 APRIL 29, 2013 2 3 Abstract The title of this work is “Indivisible and Inseparable” the motto of the Austro- Hungarian Empire. This motto is just one of many ways in the Austro-Hungarian Empire fought against the centrifugal forces seeking to destroy it. I argue here that the historic theory of decline and fall is misguided as a model for understanding the collapse of the Austro-Hungarian Empire, and question its usefulness when applied to other nation states and empires as well. I suggest that the Austro-Hungarian military, specifically its condition prior to the First World War, is an ideal lens for exploring the dissolution of the Empire at the end of the war in 1918. The Austro-Hungarian military was composed of over 10 different nationalities at a time of surging nationalism, and was the single most important institution charged with the preservation of the Empire.
    [Show full text]
  • Law, Time, and Sovereignty in Central Europe: Imperial Constitutions, Historical Rights, and the Afterlives of Empire
    Law, Time, and Sovereignty in Central Europe: Imperial Constitutions, Historical Rights, and the Afterlives of Empire Natasha Wheatley Submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy In the Graduate School of Arts and Sciences COLUMBIA UNIVERSITY 2016 © 2016 Natasha Wheatley All rights reserved ABSTRACT Law, Time, and Sovereignty in Central Europe: Imperial Constitutions, Historical Rights, and the Afterlives of Empire Natasha Wheatley This dissertation is a study of the codification of empire and its unexpected consequences. It returns to the constitutional history of the Austro-Hungarian Empire — a subject whose heyday had passed by the late 1920s — to offer a new history of sovereignty in Central Europe. It argues that the imperatives of imperial constitutionalism spurred the creation a rich jurisprudence on the death, birth, and survival of states; and that this jurisprudence, in turn, outlived the imperial context of its formation and shaped the “new international order” in interwar Central Europe. “Law, Time, and Sovereignty” documents how contemporaries “thought themselves through” the transition from a dynastic Europe of two-bodied emperor-kings to the world of the League of Nations. The project of writing an imperial constitution, triggered by the revolutions of 1848, forced jurists, politicians and others to articulate the genesis, logic, and evolution of imperial rule, generating in the process a bank or archive of imperial self-knowledge. Searching for the right language to describe imperial sovereignty entailed the creative translation of the structures and relationships of medieval composite monarchy into the conceptual molds of nineteenth-century legal thought. While the empire’s constituent principalities (especially Hungary and Bohemia) theoretically possessed autonomy, centuries of slow centralization from Vienna had rendered that legal independence immaterial.
    [Show full text]