Fuel Cell Finland Industry Group

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Fuel Cell Finland Industry Group Fuel Cell Finland Industry Group Accelerating the utilisation of fuel cells and hydrogen through networking New Business Opportunities through Sustainable Fuel Cell Applications ∗ The environment and the maintenance of a ∗ There are several types of fuel cell high quality of life call for clean, safe, secure, technologies, each with its own efficient and sustainable energy systems. characteristics and application areas. Such ∗ Fuel cells are electrochemical devices that versatility enables fuel cell systems to be combine fuel and oxygen from the air, to used in a wide range of applications, from produce electricity and heat. This kind of fuel microwatt to megawatt ones. is converted into energy without ∗ The fuel cell market has three commonly combustion, allowing for highly efficient, defined application segments; portable, quiet and clean process. transportation and stationary. ∗ Ideally, fuel cells operate on hydrogen, the ∗ The first steps of commercialisation have only by-products being water and heat. been taken in all these segments, but further However, a fuel cell system may include a research, development and demonstrations fuel reformer that can extract hydrogen are needed to expand the fuel cell and from a hydrocarbon fuel for use in the fuel hydrogen market. cell. In such a case, harmful emissions can be kept to a minimum. Fuel Cell Finland Industry Group Networks nationally and internationally Follows development trends and activates development work Exchanges information and contributes Member list by company name and contact person: (members include both fuel cell developers and fuel cell application developers, accompanied by other fuel cell value chain actors and stakeholders) A.Ojapalo Consulting Oy Outotec Oyj www.ojapalo.com www.outotec.com Anneli Ojapalo, tel. +358 40 5588025 Ilkka Kojo, tel. +358 20 529 2010 [email protected] [email protected] Patria Land Systems Oy BigMan Ltd www.patria.fi www.bigman.fi Arvo Kivelä, tel. +358 40 869 6554 Matti Lintunen, tel. +358 50 398 0066 [email protected] [email protected] Prizztech Oy Convion Oy www.prizz.fi www.convion.fi Jarmo Viitala, tel. +358 44 710 5345 Erkko Fontell, tel. +358 40 754 4389 [email protected] [email protected] Salcomp Oyj EnergyWave Oy Sandvik Mining and Construction Oy www.energywave.fi www.sandvik.com Kari Törrönen, tel. +358 50 302 1355 Mikko Kouvo, tel. +358 205 44 5298 [email protected] [email protected] Gasum Oy Savox Communication Oy Ab www.gasum.fi www.savox.com Sari Siitonen, tel. +358 40 761 5221 Tomi Kankainen, tel. +358 9 417 41100 [email protected] [email protected] Konecranes Plc VTT Technical Research Centre of Finland www.vtt.fi www.konecranes.com Jari Kiviaho, tel. +358 20 722 5298 Anna-Kaisa Repo, tel. +358 50 553 5978 [email protected] [email protected] Fuel Cell Finland Industry Group Contacts: ∗ Chairman of the board ∗ The mission of the Federation of Finnish Anna-Kaisa Repo Technology Industries is to ensure that the Finnish technology industry has the preconditions for Mobile +358 50 553 5978 success in the global marketplace. [email protected] ∗ It is the most important industrial sector in Finland: Konecranes Oyj • 60% of total Finnish exports www.konecranes.com • 80% of total Finnish R&D-investments ∗ Secretary General • 290 000 directly employed in the sector, total employment effect around 700 000, equalling a quarter Matti Leivo of the Finnish workforce. Mobile +358 40 567 5511 ∗ The Federation of Finnish Technology Industries [email protected] has approximately 1,600 member companies that The Federation of Finnish Technology Industries operate in the electronics and electrotechnical Eteläranta 10 industry, mechanical engineering industry, metals industry, information technology industry and P.O.Box 10 consulting engineering. FI-00131 Helsinki ∗ The branch associations and branch groups form a Tel. +358 9 19231, wide cooperation network of around 1,100 Fax +358 9 624 462 companies. They produce solutions for specific www.techind.fi/fc problems in their own fields, take part in international activities, and implement common projects across sub-sectors. 29.1.2014 .
Recommended publications
  • Cavotec SA & Subsidiaries 2014 2013 2012 2011 2010 EUR 000’S
    Annual Report 2014 Some highlights from 2014 Key figures on operations and an overview of our financial results over the past five years. A summary of all that makes Cavotec tick, on just three pages. 227.7 M 232.8 M 240 220.1 M 220 Millions EUR 190.0 M 200 180 160 145.0 M 140 120 100 80 60 40 20 0 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 Five years in summary Ports & Maritime Airports Mining & Tunnelling General Industry Total Americas Middle East, Africa & India 24.0 M 40.4 M FY13: 32.7 M Oceania FY13: 42.8 M 14.0 M FY13: 12.6 M Far East 45.8 M Europe FY13: 46.3 M 108.7 M FY13: 93.2 M Revenues by Regions Financial information in summary Cavotec SA & Subsidiaries 2014 2013 2012 2011 2010 EUR 000’s INCOME STATEMENT ITEMS Revenue from sales of goods 232,795 227,704 220,072 189,969 144,960 Gross Operating Result (EBITDA) 17,029 15,027 21,736 17,191 15,763 Operating Result (EBIT) 12,561 10,506 17,978 12,684 12,387 Profit for the year 10,230 10,453 12,192 5,844 8,006 Total comprehensive income 11,956 4,718 13,018 7,018 11,005 BALANCE SHEET ITEMS Non-current assets 113,453 108,696 106,141 98,027 72,885 of which Goodwill 63,801 60,479 61,646 61,930 44,784 Current assets 109,485 97,013 94,271 78,762 62,538 Assets held for sales 1,800 2,213 - - - Cash and cash equivalents 17,071 13,928 10,313 12,952 12,203 Total assets 241,809 219,637 210,725 189,741 147,626 Total equity (137,903) (108,769) (106,829) (94,873) (76,807) Interest-bearing liabilities (37,083) (50,007) (34,828) (36,664) (31,878) Non-interest-bearing liabilities (66,823) (60,861) (69,067) (58,205)
    [Show full text]
  • Patria - a Trusted Strategic Partner
    PATRIA - A TRUSTED STRATEGIC PARTNER Copyright Patria. All rights reserved. PATRIA - A TRUSTED STRATEGIC PARTNER • Patria Aviation, Patria’s subsidiary Millog and co-owned Nammo are strategic partners of the Finnish Defence Forces in times of peace, crisis and war. • Maintenance partnerships with Norwegian, Swedish etc. defence forces. • Patria is also a supplier of defence systems (vehicles, mortars, C4ISTAR) and aerostructures to the global marketplace. • International growth opportunities exist in all these segments. Copyright Patria. All rights reserved. SINCE 1921 1921 1932 1943 1972 1979 1980 1984 1986 1986 1996 1999 1999 1999 2001 2001 2004 2006 2006 2008 2009 2010 2012 2013 > Copyright Patria. All rights reserved. Key figures Net sales* Operating profit* EUR million Gross investments in fixed assets* EUR million 589,5 EUR million 514,2 462,0 23,9 415,0 427,7 87,8 78,3 15,1 52,1 56,0 46,8 13,1 12,5 8,1 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 Order Stock* EUR million Equity ratio* % Net sales outside Finland* % 1418,4 1201,7 1021,5 1056,4 48 44 55,8 56,1 780,6 49,7 49,8 31 45,3 2011 2012 54 50 2011 2012 2013 2014 215 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2015 2013 2014 * The years 2010–2013 pro forma due to the change of Nammo’s consolidation method. From the year 2014 onwards, in Patria’s financial statements, Nammo is consolidated using the equity method. Copyright Patria. All rights reserved. MODERN MAINTENANCE AT OPERATOR SITES Patria Aviation maintenance sites Patria and Millog sites in Finland Copyright Patria.
    [Show full text]
  • Privatisation Potential in the European Union
    Research Report Privatisation Potential in the European Union Research Report Privatisation Potential in the European Union Julia Borrmann, Markus Fichtinger, Christian Helmenstein, Georg Neumüller September 2014 Study on behalf of United Europe Contact: Christian Helmenstein Economica Institute Liniengasse 50-52 1060 Vienna / Austria Phone: +43/676/3200-401 Email: [email protected] Content Content 1 List of Tables and Figures 2 List of Tables 2 List of Figures 2 Executive Summary 3 1 Expected benefits of privatisation 5 1.1 Why do governments privatise? 5 1.2 Theoretical implications of the ownership structure 6 1.3 Empirical effects of privatisation 7 1.4 Potential scope of privatisation 8 2 Methodology 8 2.1 Scope of the study 8 2.2 Identification of the state-owned enterprises and the publicly held shares 9 2.3 Valuation of the government holdings in listed firms 10 2.4 Valuation of the government holdings in non-listed firms 11 2.5 Valuation of financial institutions 13 3 Value of government-held shares in firms 15 3.1 Value of government-held shares in listed firms 15 3.2 Value of government held shares in non-listed financial institutions 16 3.3 Value of government-held shares in non-listed firms excl. financial institutions 18 3.4 Total value of government-held shares in listed and non-listed firms 18 4 Conclusion 21 5 References 23 6 Appendix 25 1 List of Tables and Figures List of Tables Table 1: Total equity value of government shares in listed firms by country 15 Table 2: Thirty largest equity holdings in listed firms held by governments 16 Table 3: Equity value of non-listed financial institutions 17 Table 4: Total government holdings of listed and non-listed firms according to country 19 Table 5: Privatisation thresholds – three scenarios 20 Table 6: Equity value of government share in listed firms 25 Table 7: Equity value of government share in non-listed firms excl.
    [Show full text]
  • Statement on the Corporate Governance and Steering System 2016 Finnvera’S Financial Review 2016 2
    Statement on the Corporate Governance and Steering System 2016 FINNVERA’s FinanciaL REVIEW 2016 2 Statement on the Corporate Governance and Steering System Finnvera’s Financial Review 2016 Statement on the Corporate Governance and Steering System Contents Statement on the Corporate Governance and Steering System .............. 3 Acts and rules governing the operations ........................................... 3 The goals of good corporate governance ........................................... 3 Ownership and ownership policy ..................................................... 4 Administrative bodies of Finnvera ........................................ ........... 4 General Meeting of Shareholders ........................................ 4 Supervisory Board ............................................................ 4 Board of Directors ............................................................ 5 Inspection Committee of the Board of Directors ..................... 7 Remuneration Committee of the Board of Directors ................ 7 Chief Executive Officer, Management Group and Corporate Management Team ............................................. 8 Salaries and fees .......................................................................... 8 Operating principles for internal control ............................................ 9 Risk management ......................................................................... 9 Controlling the financial reporting process ........................................ 9 Compliance function .....................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Regulator\ Reform in Finland
    5HJXODWRU\ 5HIRUP LQ )LQODQG 7KH 5ROH RI &RPSHWLWLRQ 3ROLF\ LQ 5HJXODWRU\ 5HIRUP ORGANISATION FOR ECONOMIC CO-OPERATION AND DEVELOPMENT Pursuant to Article 1 of the Convention signed in Paris on 14th December 1960, and which came into force on 30th September 1961, the Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD) shall promote policies designed: to achieve the highest sustainable economic growth and employment and a rising standard of living in Member countries, while maintaining financial stability, and thus to contribute to the development of the world economy; to contribute to sound economic expansion in Member as well as non-member countries in the process of economic development; and to contribute to the expansion of world trade on a multilateral, non-discriminatory basis in accordance with international obligations. The original Member countries of the OECD are Austria, Belgium, Canada, Denmark, France, Germany, Greece, Iceland, Ireland, Italy, Luxembourg, the Netherlands, Norway, Portugal, Spain, Sweden, Switzerland, Turkey, the United Kingdom and the United States. The following countries became Members subsequently through accession at the dates indicated hereafter: Japan (28th April 1964), Finland (28th January 1969), Australia (7th June 1971), New Zealand (29th May 1973), Mexico (18th May 1994), the Czech Republic (21st December 1995), Hungary (7th May 1996), Poland (22nd November 1996), Korea (12th December 1996) and the Slovak Republic (14th December 2000). The Commission of the European Communities takes part in the work of the OECD (Article 13 of the OECD Convention). Publié en français sous le titre : LE ROLE DE LA POLITIQUE DE LA CONCURRENCE DANS LA RÉFORME DE LA RÉGLEMENTATION © OECD 2003.
    [Show full text]
  • CLEANER ENERGY Finnish Model for the Development and Integration of Gas Transport Infrastructure
    CLEANER ENERGY Finnish model for the development and integration of gas transport infrastructure Gazterm 2019 Jouni Haikarainen 02/05/2019 Jouni Haikarainen 3 CONTENT 1. Gas market integration in the Baltic Sea region 2. Security of gas supply form Finnish perspective 3. Potential for LNG supplies to Finland 4. Prospects for cooperation regarding the EU strategic infrastructure 1. Gas Market Integration in the Baltic Sea Region 02/05/2019 Jouni Haikarainen 5 BALTIC GAS MARKET INTEGRATION • Finland, Estonia and Latvia will form a common Entry-Exit 25 TWh tariff zone 2020. Finland will remain its own balancing zone. • Target to integrate the market fully – earliest 2022 • Finnish, Estonian and Latvian TSO’s signed ITC-contract in 5 TWh January – distribution of entry revenues, harmonized entry tariffs • Finland will open the gas market 2020 and give up derogation along with the commissioning of the 15 TWh Balticconnector pipeline connecting Finland to Estonia 24 TWh FINNISH GAS MARKET OPENING 2020 Finnish gas market will be opened for competition 2020 – The Natural gas market act was introduced 2017 and it has been in force since 2018. The gas transmission network will be unbundled from Gasum by 2020 using ownership unbundling model. The unbundled new TSO will be the Finnish gas transmission system operator responsible for gas transmission infrastructure and gas market services. GASUM WILL CONTINUE TO DEVELOP THE NORDIC GAS ECOSYSTEM Tornio Oulu LNG production plant Kuopio LNG terminal LNG terminal (joint project) Honkajoki Gasum, biogas Pori Lahti Gasum, biowaste and biogas Huittinen Kouvola Vehmaa Riihimäki Biogas production plant (joint project) Turku Espoo Örebro Västerås Vadsbo Risavika Katrineholm Øra Lysekil Lidköping Jordberga 2.
    [Show full text]
  • 2012 CCG Template
    Doing Business in Finland: 2012 Country Commercial Guide for U.S. Companies INTERNATIONAL COPYRIGHT, U.S. & FOREIGN COMMERCIAL SERVICE AND U.S. DEPARTMENT OF STATE, 2012. ALL RIGHTS RESERVED OUTSIDE OF THE UNITED STATES. • Chapter 1: Doing Business In Finland • Chapter 2: Political and Economic Environment • Chapter 3: Selling U.S. Products and Services • Chapter 4: Leading Sectors for U.S. Export and Investment • Chapter 5: Trade Regulations, Customs and Standards • Chapter 6: Investment Climate • Chapter 7: Trade and Project Financing • Chapter 8: Business Travel • Chapter 9: Contacts, Market Research and Trade Events • Chapter 10: Guide to Our Services Return to table of contents Chapter 1: Doing Business In Finland • Market Overview • Market Challenges • Market Opportunities • Market Entry Strategy Market Overview Return to top Finland, a member of the European Union (EU) since 1995, has redefined itself from a quiet agricultural based economy to a trend setting, global center for technology. Finland has commercial clout far in excess of its modest 5.4 million population. Finland routinely ranks at the very top in international surveys of research and development funding, competitiveness, transparency, literacy, and education. Helsinki, is a pocket-sized green maritime metropolis, and the Design Capital for 2012; a yearlong event showcasing the global influence of Finnish design and innovation. In Finland, nature reigns supreme and it is no surprise that Helsinki was the site of the first LEED certified building in the Nordics. Finland, along with all its Nordic neighbors, has a focused interest in green build and energy efficient and intelligent building products, services and technologies. Contrary to popular misconception, Finland is not a part of Scandinavia.
    [Show full text]
  • This Document Has Been Downloaded from Tampub – the Institutional Repository of University of Tampere
    View metadata, citation and similar papers at core.ac.uk brought to you by CORE provided by Trepo - Institutional Repository of Tampere University This document has been downloaded from TamPub – The Institutional Repository of University of Tampere Post-print The permanent address of the publication is http://urn.fi/URN:NBN:fi:uta-201405281513 Author(s): Kankaanpää, Jari; Oulasvirta, Lasse; Wacker, Jani Title: Steering and Monitoring Model of State-Owned Enterprises Year: 2014 Journal Title: International Journal of Public Administration Vol and number: 37 : 7 Pages: 409-423 ISSN: 0190-0692 Discipline: Business and management; Political science School /Other Unit: School of Management Item Type: Journal Article Language: en DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/01900692.2013.858355 URN: URN:NBN:fi:uta-201405281513 All material supplied via TamPub is protected by copyright and other intellectual property rights, and duplication or sale of all part of any of the repository collections is not permitted, except that material may be duplicated by you for your research use or educational purposes in electronic or print form. You must obtain permission for any other use. Electronic or print copies may not be offered, whether for sale or otherwise to anyone who is not an authorized user. Steering and Monitoring Model of State-Owned Enterprises Introduction Privatisation of stated-owned enterprises (SOEs) gained considerable momentum in developing and developed countries in the 1980s and 1990s (The World Bank, 2006, p. 3). Despite wide-ranging privatisation programmes, SOEs are still and will be an important part of many economies, especially in developing economies (La Porta, Lopez-de-Silanes, & Shleifer, 1999; Ezzamel, Wilmott, & Worthington, 2008; Vagliasindi, 2008; Ennser-Jedenastik, 2013).
    [Show full text]
  • Gasum Annual Report 2003
    Annual Report 2003 The Gallen-Kallela Museum, Contents Tarvaspää Akseli Gallen-Kallela (1865-1931) was one of the leading influences in the golden age of Finnish art. Chief executive officer’s review 6 His works capture national motifs and he is also known for his Natural gas market in 2003 8 romantic paintings illustrating the Kalevala, Finland’s national epic. Local distribution companies 12 Not only was he an outstanding painter, but also a pioneer in Natural gas supply 14 graphic and applied art.Tarvaspää was designed by the artist and Operation of the transmission system 18 completed in 1913.The crenellated tower, fantastic details and Grid maintenance and development 20 stateliness - recalling knightly tales - of this art nouveau studio- Gasum and the community 22 home make it a unique work of art. Gasum Oy’s Board of Directors’ report for 2003 28 Today, the Gallen-Kallela Museum displays changing exhibitions of Income statement 33 works by Gallen-Kallela and his contemporaries, as well as works of contemporary art that have Balance sheet 34 points in common with the life’s work of this national artist. Cash flow statement 36 Gasum Oy is one of the museum’s Notes to the financial statements 37 principal partners in 2004. Unbundled accounting for natural gas operations 46 Auditors’ report 48 Work on cover The Lair of the Lynx, Oil, 1906. Corporate Governance 49 Size 67 x 98 cm. Private collection. Contact Information 50 Early Spring, 1906. Gallen-Kallela was on a painting trip and ski hunt for lynx at Konginkangas. The sunshine and glistening crust of snow are immortalised in many of Gallen-Kallela’s bright winter landscapes, which reflect a new, bolder and brighter use of colour and form.
    [Show full text]
  • Regulatory Reform in Finland
    Regulatory Reform in Finland MARKETISATION OF GOVERNMENT SERVICES – STATE-OWNED ENTERPRISES ORGANISATION FOR ECONOMIC CO-OPERATION AND DEVELOPMENT Pursuant to Article 1 of the Convention signed in Paris on 14th December 1960, and which came into force on 30th September 1961, the Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD) shall promote policies designed: − to achieve the highest sustainable economic growth and employment and a rising standard of living in Member countries, while maintaining financial stability, and thus to contribute to the development of the world economy; − to contribute to sound economic expansion in Member as well as non-member countries in the process of economic development; and − to contribute to the expansion of world trade on a multilateral, non-discriminatory basis in accordance with international obligations. The original Member countries of the OECD are Austria, Belgium, Canada, Denmark, France, Germany, Greece, Iceland, Ireland, Italy, Luxembourg, the Netherlands, Norway, Portugal, Spain, Sweden, Switzerland, Turkey, the United Kingdom and the United States. The following countries became Members subsequently through accession at the dates indicated hereafter: Japan (28th April 1964), Finland (28th January 1969), Australia (7th June 1971), New Zealand (29th May 1973), Mexico (18th May 1994), the Czech Republic (21st December 1995), Hungary (7th May 1996), Poland (22nd November 1996), Korea (12th December 1996) and the Slovak Republic (14th December 2000). The Commission of the European Communities takes part in the work of the OECD (Article 13 of the OECD Convention). © OECD 2003. Permission to reproduce a portion of this work for non-commercial purposes or classroom use should be obtained through the Centre français d’exploitation du droit de copie (CFC), 20, rue des Grands-Augustins, 75006 Paris, France, tel.
    [Show full text]
  • Mint of Finland Group's Annual Report 2015
    CEO’s report Page 1 / 40 CEO’s report Mint of Finland Group made progress in all business areas during 2015, even though we failed to fully achieve our profitability targets. We paved the way for a better future by continuing to follow through strategically important changes. The sector is typically dependent on the development of raw material prices. The prices of nickel, copper and steel have been falling for several years. This makes it increasingly more challenging for metal processors to identify niches of profitability in the different areas of operations. The company managed to solve some, but not all of these challenges. Progress in the circulation and collector coin businesses Customer satisfaction and Demand in the circulation coin business picked up after a quiet spell in 2014. Mint of profitability are indicators Finland successfully won new customers in Latin America and Africa. The projects of everything we do. secured will mean work for the company’s circulation coin production for a longer period. It was also pleasing to note, that the company managed to further strength customer relations through the quality of its products and operations. Despite numerous measures to restore the company to a sound basis, the Group failed to a positive result. The blank business failed to fully achieve the volume pursued, but the operating result was clearly positive. In the collector coin business, our long-term work with customer relations and developing our own business was rewarded with positive earnings. Likewise, there was an increase in exports of Finnish collector coins, which now account for almost 50% of sales, which is also encouraging looking ahead.
    [Show full text]
  • Comparison of Primary and Secondary Particle Formation from Natural Gas
    Comparison of primary and secondary particle formation from natural gas engine exhaust and of their volatility characteristics Jenni Alanen1, Pauli Simonen1, Sanna Saarikoski2, Hilkka Timonen2, Oskari Kangasniemi1, Erkka Saukko1, Risto Hillamo2, Kati Lehtoranta3, Timo Murtonen3, Hannu Vesala3, Jorma Keskinen1, and Topi Rönkkö1 1Aerosol Physics, Faculty of Natural Sciences, Tampere University of Technology, P.O. Box 692, 33101 Tampere, Finland 2Atmospheric Composition Research, Finnish Meteorological Institute, P.O. Box 503, 00101 Helsinki, Finland 3VTT Technical Research Centre of Finland Ltd., P.O. Box 1000, 02044 VTT, Espoo, Finland Correspondence to: Topi Rönkkö (topi.ronkko@tut.fi) Abstract. Natural gas usage in traffic and energy production sector is a growing trend worldwide; thus, an assessment of its effects on air quality, human health and climate is required. Engine exhaust is a source of primary particulate emissions and secondary aerosol precursors, which both contribute to air quality and can cause adverse health effects. Technologies, such as cleaner engines or fuels, that produce less primary and secondary aerosol could potentially significantly decrease atmospheric 5 particle concentrations and their adverse effects. In this study, we used a potential aerosol mass (PAM) chamber to investigate the secondary aerosol formation potential of natural gas engine exhaust. The PAM chamber was used with a constant UV-light voltage, which resulted in relatively long equivalent atmospheric ages of 11 days at most. The studied retrofitted natural gas engine exhaust was observed to form secondary aerosol. The mass of the total aged particles, i.e., particle mass measured downstream of the PAM chamber, was 6-268 times as high as the mass of the emitted primary exhaust particles.
    [Show full text]