The Vicar's Letter
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Load more
Recommended publications
-
Summer Fun Special! Free!
Thames Valley East FREE! July/August 2017 - Issue 91 SUMMER FUN SPECIAL! PRICE 14 MATCH YEARS PROMISE EXPERIENCE TRY BEFORE YOU BUY! BIGGEST DISPLAY IN THE THAMES VALLEY 01628 660893 • justoutdoortoys.co.uk Abbey Rose Nursery, Burnham, Slough SL1 8NJ RECRUITING NOW Successful ‘business mum’ is seeking 5 working partners to work part-time from home, alongside & without compromising family commitments or current career. If you have a supervisory, managerial, sales, marketing, recruitment or self-employed background, or you wish to develop an extraordinary lifestyle, please call Diana Page 01235 533362 07747 086518 ...endless ideas for families of young children. Packed with interesting features and fun things to do with the family in Maidenhead - Windsor - Marlow - Ascot - Slough - Egham An lndependent Preparatory School & Nursery for boys aged 3 to 7 and girls 3-11 years It All Adds UP Contact us to arrange a visit www.coworthflexlands.co.uk Chertsey Rd, Chobham, GU 24 8TE, near Sunningdale & Virginia Water 01276 855707 5.15 6 ON OFFER AT REDROOFS... FULL TIME CO ED DAY SCHOOL REDROOFS AGENCY Years 5-13+ Academic Education up to GCSE and 6th Ages 4-18 Representing our Talented Children and Form. BTEC Level 3 Extended alongside the best providing TV, Film, and Theatre opportunities for Performing Arts Training. suitable pupils. GOLD TEAM SUMMER SCHOOLS 2017 Ages 6-16+ Due to popular demand we are delighted Ages 5-14+ Our hugely popular Put on a Show Summer to be launching BRAND NEW GOLD TEAMS ON TUESDAY Schools are now bookable online. Daily swimming in our AND SATURDAY. -
Newsletter No. 75 Winter 2008/09 President: David W.D
O.M.A. Newsletter No. 75 Winter 2008/09 President: David W.D. Eyre BA (Hons) ____________________________________________________________________________ The Newsletter of the Old Maidonians’ Association ________________________________________________________________________ OMA Committee News programme, The Dragons’ Den. More information about these two prizewinners is given in the News of Old Maidonians section. OMA Website Plans are under way for an OMA website. Chris Raymond (1962/68) (see News of Old Maidonians), The G R J Murray Bequest Initial projects for which acting on behalf of the Committee, has registered the this bequest has been used have been the founding of the domain name of oldmaidonians.org.uk and has agreed to GRJ Murray Prize, the refurbishment of the School’s War be the site’s webmaster. He will control access to the site. Memorial Board (details given below) and a donation to The intention is to link the site to that of Desborough the Battle of Britain Historical Society for their assistance School’s (desborough.org.uk). in identifying two of our Old Maidonians who had lost The site will initially contain news items, a list of their lives during World War 2 as having fought in the forthcoming events, a short history of the OMA, a battle (details given below). membership application form, the Rules of the The G R J Murray Prize is for the student who makes an Association, items/photographs submitted by members, outstanding contribution to the School and for whom no etc. A section of the website will contain copies of the challenge is too much trouble. current and previous issues of the OMA Newsletter, but as these include contact details of members, this section will School War Memorial Boards Special features of the be password-protected. -
Council Tax Base 2020-21 Contains Confidential Or Exempt Information?
Report Title: Council Tax Base 2020-21 Contains Confidential or No - Part I Exempt Information? Member reporting: Lead Member for Finance Meeting and Date: Cabinet – 19 December 2019 Responsible Officer(s): Terry Neaves, Interim S151 Officer Wards affected: All REPORT SUMMARY 1. This report deals with the statutory requirement to set the Council’s tax base for 2020/21. The tax base is used by Thames Valley Police, Berkshire Fire and Rescue Authority, local Parish Councils as well as the Royal Borough for setting precepts and Council Tax next year. 2. The tax base is in line with the level anticipated in the Councils Medium Term Financial Plan and has increased since last year for two main reasons: The number of properties being built. Reduced number of households claiming Local Council Tax Support Discount. 1. DETAILS OF RECOMMENDATION(S) RECOMMENDATION: That Cabinet notes the report and: i) Approves the Council Tax base for the whole of the Borough area, for 2020/21 at 68,817 as detailed in this report and appendices. This is an increase of 464 over the 2019/20 base, a 0.7% increase. ii) Note a Council Tax collection rate of 99.5% for 2020/21 iii) Note an estimated deficit on the Council Tax Collection Fund in 2019/20 of £142k of which the Council’s share is £113k. 2. REASON(S) FOR RECOMMENDATION(S) AND OPTIONS CONSIDERED Section 33 of the Local Government Finance Act 1992 and the Local Authorities (Calculation of Council Tax Base) (England) Regulations 2012 requires the Council as the Billing Authority to calculate a Council Tax Base for its area by 31 January each year. -
Freehold - £425,000
ESTATE AGENTS • VALUERS 24 Kiln Hill, Shottesbrooke, Maidenhead, Berkshire SL6 3SN Ref: 4691 Freehold - £425,000 ENTRANCE HALL GROUND FLOOR BATHROOM KITCHEN / BREAKFAST ROOM LIVING ROOM THREE BEDROOMS FIRST FLOOR SHOWER ROOM DETACHED GARAGE APPROXIMATELY 150FT / 45M LONG REAR GARDEN JOINT SOLE AGENTS A charming and characterful semi detached property, understood to date back to the 1820’s, with later additions and providing scope for some updating. The cottage occupies an appealing partially wooded setting in Shottesbrooke which is a rural hamlet abutting White Waltham which boasts a popular primary school, historic church and the village pub opposite the cricket pitch. Maidenhead and Twyford railway stations are equidistant. 43 Thames Street, Windsor, Berkshire SL4 1PR Tel : 01753 856 683 Fax: 01753 854 945 e.mail: [email protected] www.lsandm.co.uk The accommodation is arranged on two floors as follows: GROUND FLOOR COVERED ENTRANCE: with front door leading to small: ENTRANCE HALL: tiled floor; cupboard housing fuse box and electricity meter; sliding door to the Kitchen / Breakfast Room and door to: BATHROOM: suite of panelled bath, pedestal wash basin and low level w.c.; heated towel rail; frosted window. KITCHEN / BREAKFAST ROOM: 18’10 x 11’9 (5.7m x 3.6m) narrowing to 8’ (2.4m); secondary glazed Georgian style window overlooking the rear garden; extensive range of limed oak fronted base and eye level units; 1½ bowl stainless steel sink unit; space and plumbing for washing machine; space and plumbing for dishwasher; space for tumble dryer; built-in four ring electric hob with hood over; built-in Hotpoint double oven with cupboards above and below; cupboard housing water tank; storage heater; study area; part glazed door to: LIVING ROOM: 21’6 x 15’ (6.6m x 4.6m); a pretty double aspect room; exposed beams; brick fireplace; original leaded window to front and secondary glazed Georgian style windows to side; further small original window; two storage heaters; telephone point. -
Consultation Statement 2020
Datchet Design Guide Supplementary Planning Document Consultation Statement 2020 November 2020 Datchet Design Guide – Consultation Statement Page left intentionally blank 2 Datchet Design Guide – Consultation Statement Contents 1. Introduction ................................................................................................................................................4 2. Regulation 12 Consultation ........................................................................................................................5 Consultation Methodology .........................................................................................................................5 Material consulted on .................................................................................................................................6 Responding to the consultation ..................................................................................................................7 3. The consultation response..........................................................................................................................8 Number of Representors ............................................................................................................................8 Number of Representations & Representation Points ...............................................................................8 4. Summary of main issues raised in response to the consultation…………………………………………………………..9 Appendix 1: List Of Statutory Consultees consulted -
The Landmark Trust Shottesbrooke Maidenhead Berkshire SL6 3SW Charity Registered in England & Wales 243312 and Scotland SC039205
ASCOG HOUSE AND MEIKLE ASCOG, ISLE OF BUTE, ARGYLL AND BUTE The history of the Ascog demesne goes back further than either of the two houses on it. In 1312 Robert the Bruce is said to have given Ascog to the Bute family of Glass. In 1594, the estate, including a mill, Loch Ascog and Nether and Over Ascog, was bought by John Stewart of Kilchattan, a distant kinsman of the Stewarts of Bute who became Earls and later Marquesses of Bute. Ascog House - John Stewart may have built the first house at Ascog, replacing an older tower. Despite the date of 1678 above one of the dormer windows, the original Ascog House was built earlier than that. With its stair tower and cap-house, it is of a type commonly built around 1600. In addition, in the wall of the present kitchen is part of a grand chimneypiece. This belonged to a great hall whose floor and ceiling were both at a higher level than today. In 1673 John Stewart of Ascog, grandson of the first John Stewart, married Margaret Cunningharn and it is their initials that are engraved on the house. They must have carried out a major reconstruction, lowering the floors to create two main storeys, and adding the dormer windows. John Stewart was rich enough to lend the Earl of Bute £9,385 to help re-build Rothesay Castle after damage in the Civil War. He was also crowner or coroner of Bute from 1666-98. During the 18th century, the original mullion windows of Ascog House were enlarged and fitted with sash and casement frames. -
(Public Pack)Agenda Document for Rights of Way & Highway
Public Document Pack NOTICE OF MEETING RIGHTS OF WAY & HIGHWAY LICENSING PANEL will meet on WEDNESDAY, 7TH APRIL, 2021 At 6.15 pm by VIRTUAL MEETING - ONLINE ACCESS ON RBWM YOUTUBE TO: MEMBERS OF THE RIGHTS OF WAY & HIGHWAY LICENSING PANEL COUNCILLORS MAUREEN HUNT (CHAIRMAN), GARY MUIR (VICE-CHAIRMAN), SAMANTHA RAYNER, DAVID CANNON, CLIVE BASKERVILLE, PHIL HASELER, MANDY BRAR AND WISDOM DA COSTA SUBSTITUTE MEMBERS COUNCILLORS GURPREET BHANGRA, GERRY CLARK, KAREN DAVIES, SHAMSUL SHELIM, SAYONARA LUXTON, CHRISTINE BATESON, NEIL KNOWLES AND SIMON WERNER Karen Shepherd – Head of Governance - Issued: 26th March 2021 Members of the Press and Public are welcome to attend Part I of this meeting. The agenda is available on the Council’s web site at www.rbwm.gov.uk or contact the Panel Administrator Mark Beeley 01628 796345 / [email protected] Recording of Meetings – In line with the council’s commitment to transparency the Part I (public) section of the virtual meeting will be streamed live and recorded via Zoom. By participating in the meeting by audio and/or video, you are giving consent to being recorded and acknowledge that the recording will be in the public domain. If you have any questions regarding the council’s policy, please speak to Democratic Services or Legal representative at the meeting. AGENDA PART I ITEM SUBJECT PAGE NO 1. APOLOGIES FOR ABSENCE - To receive any apologies for absence. 2. DECLARATIONS OF INTEREST 3 - 4 To receive any declarations of interest. 3. MINUTES 5 - 8 To confirm the minutes of the meeting held on 4th March 2019. 4. -
The Vicar's Letter
The Vicar’s Letter The Vicarage, Waltham Road, (corner of Foliejohn Way) Woodlands Park Telephone 01628 822000 Dear Friends, For the past couple of days, our house has been under siege — from a jay. There is a pair of them building a nest in a large tree just across the road, and while one busies itself pulling apart a small tree in our garden to provide nesting material, the other has decided to try to get into the house. Indeed, even as I write this, it is pecking at the window behind me. It’s tried all the windows on this side of the house: pecking and scratching, high up and low down, perched on the sill or hovering with its wings. And it’s left messy marks, some apparently of its own blood, all over some of them. For a bird which is meant to be (relatively) intelligent, it is proving itself to be remarkably thick. I’ll give it full marks for persistence, but you’d have thought it ought to have learned by now that there really is no way in. I can’t imagine what it hopes to gain by coming in, but what is certain is that its goal is unattainable, and all it will achieve is to waste a lot of time and effort getting hugely frustrated and more than likely hurting itself in the process. Coincidentally, I’ve also been reading the Old Testament book of Ecclesiastes. It’s a ruthless exposure of how we humans often behave in ways which are really quite similar. -
The Vicar's Letter
The Vicar’s Letter The Vicarage, Waltham Road, (corner of Foliejohn Way) Woodlands Park Telephone 01628 822000 Dear Friends, When I was little, I could never understand the attitude of grown-ups to snow. Snow was fun. Snow was enjoyable. Snow gave you the opportunity to make snowmen, have snowball fights, or go tobogganing. And we didn’t get nearly enough of it. So when it snowed it was exciting. It was something to be welcomed with joy. But grown-ups didn’t seem to think so. They complained about it. They hoped it wouldn’t snow, and grumbled when it did. They thought it was a nuisance. Now I’ve grown up myself I can see both sides. I understand why many of us really don’t like the snow (however much we may say we want a ‘white Christmas’). I know the frustrations when bad weather means that we can’t do what we had planned to do, or when others can’t do what we were relying on them to do. And there are obvious problems for those whose jobs involve trying to get about or working outside, or who have a long commute. But if I’m honest, then I still side with the children. These last few weeks we have seen more snow than I think I have ever experienced before — certainly in my adult life. By the time you read this that may be just a memory, or we may have had yet more. But every time it’s happened, or been promised, then (whatever difficulties it has caused to my own plans) deep down I have had that frisson of excitement that I used to get as a child. -
Your Guide to Council Tax 2020/21
Your guide to Council Tax 2020/21 www.rbwm.gov.uk Follow us on Facebook RBWM Follow us on Twitter @RBWM Royal Borough revenue budget 2019/20 2020/21 Net Gross Specific Other Net Service / Expenses expenditure expenditure Govt. grants income expenditure £'000 £'000 £'000 £'000 £'000 Adult social care 37,474 61,579 (4,729) (18,109) 38,741 Central (other services/ 6,316 18,802 (649) (6,189) 11,964 expenses) Children’s and education 25,554 100,626 (71,647) (2,554) 26,425 Culture and related 5,751 5,721 (3,855) 1,866 Environmental and regulatory 14,630 17,418 (2,567) 14,851 Highways and transport 6,920 18,145 (76) (11,794) 6,275 Housing 3,493 34,408 (28,609) (1,435) 4,364 Planning 320 5,169 (6) (5,045) 118 Public health 980 3,144 (1,986) (40) 1,118 Total service expenditure 101,438 265,012 (107,702) (51,588) 105,722 Non-service costs 12,711 8,171 Notional pension and capital (20,282) (19,216) accounting Total borough expenditure 93,867 94,677 less unparished area costs (1,094) (1,217) less adult social care precept (5,109) (6,556) Budget requirement 87,664 86,904 Services are shown here in SeRCOP (Service Reporting Code of Practice) format 2 Royal Borough budget 2020/21 and changes Royal Borough budget The Royal Borough has set a Band D equivalent Council Tax of £1,077.41 for the year ending 31 March changes 2019/20 to 2021. This is calculated as follows: Tax Base (Band D Equivalent Properties) 68,353 for 2019-20 and 68,691 for 2020-21. -
Maidenhead & Windsor Deanery Berkshire Archdeaconry
Berkshire Archdeaconry Maidenhead & Windsor Deanery Notification of Deanery Synod Representatives for new triennium 2020-2023 (Note important change: CRR Part 3 Rule 15 (5) new triennium starts on 1st July 2020) Reported Electoral Allocated No. Formula agreed by Diocesan Roll as at reps as at Synod November 2019 Parish 20/12/2019 20/12/2019 Elected Electoral roll size lay reps Bray with Braywood 104 3 up to 40 1 Burchetts Green 191 4 41–80 2 Clewer 67 2 81–160 3 Clewer St. Stephen with 161–240 4 Spital 57 2 Cookham 250 5 241–320 5 Cookham Dean 104 3 321–400 6 Cox Green 94 3 401–500 7 Dedworth 158 3 501–600 8 Furze Platt 172 4 601–720 9 Maidenhead All Saints Boyne 721–840 10 Hill 147 3 Maidenhead St. Andrew and 841–1000 11 St. Mary Magdalene 481 7 Maidenhead St. Luke 102 3 >1000 12 New Windsor 76 2 Old Windsor 104 3 Waltham St. Lawrence 86 3 White Waltham with Shottesbrooke 65 2 Windsor Holy Trinity 19 1 TOTAL 2277 53 Key: Estimated where no returns made at 20/12/2019 Please note: The No. of Deanery Synod reps has been calculated based on the ER figures submitted up to 20/12/2019 as presented at each APCM held in 2019. This information has either been taken from the online submission (primary source); the ER certificate; or information received by email and telephone conversations. 2019 was an Electoral Roll Revision year so it has therefore had an impact on the number of places some deaneries / parishes have been allocated. -
Windsor and Maidenhead
5/9/2018 Local Government Boundary Commission for England Consultation Portal Windsor and Maidenhead Personal Details: Name: Robert Elmes E-mail: Postcode: Organisation Name: Comment text: Splitting the great park from Old Windsor into Ascot is madness. This seems to be just about the numbers with no consideration for the community or good governance. The great park residences utilise many services in Old Windsor and this change would leave them isolated in that respect. Also including areas of Windsor such as King Edward VII Hospital and Trevelyan school is short sighted. These areas identify, rightly so, with the urban town of Windsor, rather than the rural village of Old Windsor. People in these areas have very different needs and their councillors should be able to reflect those. I don't see how good governance could come about by "tagging on" this area just to make up some numbers. I strongly urge the commission to review the currently proposed boundary changes, being made to mainly accommodate changes in Maidenhead, to not take an approach that detriments other areas. This could be in terms of changing the boundary to better reflect the local topology and demographic and/or rethinking the number of councillors actually required to allow for a boundary setup that actually meets the needs of the people, rather than (as it seems) plucking out of thin air a target number and then trying to make that fit. Uploaded Documents: None Uploaded https://consultation.lgbce.org.uk/node/print/informed-representation/12792 1/1 Windsor and Maidenhead Personal Details: Name: Lucy Fearnley E-mail: Postcode: Organisation Name: Comment text: I feel there is no need to split a community that functions so well.