Leeches: a Review on Their Pathogenic and Beneficial Effects
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Load more
Recommended publications
-
Introduction of Médicinal Leeches Into the West Indies in the Nineteenth Century
A study in médical history: introduction of médicinal leeches into the West Indies in the nineteenth century Roy T. SAWYER Biopharm (UK) Ltd, 2 Bryngwili Road, Hendy, Carms. SA4 1XB (UK) 102364.1027® compuserve.com Fred O. P. HECHTEL School of Biological Sciences, University of Wales, Swansea SA2 8PP (UK) James W. HAGY Department of History, University of Charleston, Charleston, SC 29424 (USA) Emanuela SCACHERI Department of Biotechnology, Pharmacia & Upjohn, Viale Pasteur 10,1-20014 Nerviano, Milano (Italy) Sawyer R. T., Hechtel F. O. P., Hagy J. W. & Scacheri E. 1998. — A study in médical histo ry: introduction of médicinal leeches into the West Indies in the nineteenth century. Zoosystema 20 (3) : 451-470. ABSTRACT Médicinal leeches were not found in the West Indies prior to 1822, but by the turn of the century, a large, aggressive leech abounded on Puerto Rico, St Lucia, Martinique and other islands. The authors conclude that this "Caribbean leech", described as Hirudinaria {Poecilobdella) blanchardi Moore, 1901, is a junior synonym of the "buffalo" leech Hirudinaria manillensis (Lesson, 1842), the médicinal leech of India and neighbouring countries of South-East Asia. The final proof of the true identity of this West Indian leech came from comparison of the nucleotide séquences of the cDNAs of the hirudin polypeptide from leeches from St Lucia and from Bangladesh. The authors présent évidence that this leech arrived from ships carrying labourers from colonial India starting in the mid-1840's. Each of thèse ships were required to have leeches on board for médicinal purposes. KEY WORDS Hirudinea, During this study, the existence of a second introduced leech species in the Hirudinaria, West Indies was unexpectedly discovered, in Guadeloupe. -
Intestinal Helminths of the White Sucker, Catostomus Commersoni (Lacepede), in SE Wisconsin
OF WASHINGTON, VOLUME 41, NUMBER 1, JANUARY 1974 81 Intestinal Helminths of the White Sucker, Catostomus commersoni (Lacepede), in SE Wisconsin OMAR M. AMIN Science Division, University of Wisconsin-Parkside, Kenosha 53140 ABSTRACT: Five species of helminths were recovered from the intestine of the white sucker, Catostomus commersoni (Lacepede), in southeastern Wisconsin. Hosts were seined in five sites in both the Root River (Milwaukee and Racine counties; autumn 1971) and the Pike River (Racine and Kenosha counties; autumn 1972). The helminths are Triganodistomum attenuatum Mueller and Van Cleave, 1932 (Trem- atoda: Lissorchiidae), new locality record; Eiacetabulum macrocephalum McCrae, 1962 (Cestoda: Caryophyllaeidae), new state record; Biacetabulum biloculoides Mackiewicz and McCrae, 1965 (Cestoda: Caryophyllaeidae), new state record; Acanthocephahis dims (Van Cleave, 1931) Van Cleave and Townsend, 1936, new host and state record; Dorylaimtis sp. (?) Dujardin, 1845 (Nematoda: Dory- laimidae), a nonparasitie nematode reported for the first time in this fish. Distribution, structural obser- vations, and host-parasite relationships of the above species are discussed. Previous reports of fish parasites in Wis- upon recovery were placed in 70% alcohol. consin were confined to the geographical Hosts were classed in one of three size classes northeast and west (Pearse, 1924a), north according to their total length, 5-9.9, 10-14.9, (Bangham, 1946), northwest (Fischthal, 1947, and 15-37 cm. 1950, 1952), and east (Anthony, 1963). These Trematodes and cestodes were stained in reports dealt only with host records. Literature Semichon's carmine, cleared in xylene, and on the ecology or host-parasite relationship of whole-mounted in Canada balsam. Acantho- fish parasites in Wisconsin is relatively scarce cephalans were fixed in Bouin's fluid, stained (Marshall and Gilbert, 1905; Pearse, 1924b; in Harris' hematoxylin, cleared in beechwood Cross, 1938). -
(Nematoda: Thelazioidea) in the Blue Sucker, Cycleptus Elongatus (Lesueur, 1817), from Illinois
Transactions of the Illinois State Academy of Science received 12/10/01 (2002), Volume 95, #2, pp. 107 - 109 accepted 2/22/02 First Record of Rhabdochona cascadilla Wigdor, 1918 (Nematoda: Thelazioidea) in the Blue Sucker, Cycleptus elongatus (Lesueur, 1817), from Illinois William G. Dyer and William J. Poly Department of Zoology Southern Illinois University Carbondale, Illinois 62901-6501 ABSTRACT Rhabdochona cascadilla was detected in the intestine of Cycleptus elongatus from the Mississippi River in Randolph County, Illinois. This constitutes the first record of this rhabdochonid nematode in the blue sucker and the only internal helminth for this host. INTRODUCTION Nematodes of the genus Rhabdochona Railliet, 1916 (Thelazioidea, Rhabdochonidae) are cosmopolitan in distribution as intestinal parasites of freshwater fishes (Moravec and Coy Otero, 1987; Moravec, 1994). Approximately 96 nominal species have been recognized of which 19 have been reported from North and South America (see Sanchez-Alvarez et al., 1998). Of rhabdochonid nematodes reported from North America, Rhabdochona cascadilla Wigdor, 1918 has been recorded in 13 families, 30 genera, and 53 species of freshwater fishes across Canada and the United States (Hoffman, 1999). Identification of Rhabdochona species is difficult as many of them have been inadequately or erroneously described, and as pointed out by Sanchez-Alvarez et al. (1998), a detailed taxonomic revision of all putative species in this group warrants initiation. MATERIALS AND METHODS A single adult female blue sucker (557 mm standard length) was collected incidentally by electrofishing on 24 October 1996 from the Mississippi River just below the mouth of the Kaskaskia River, Randolph County, Illinois and was transported alive to the laboratory. -
Digenean Metacercaria (Trematoda, Digenea, Lepocreadiidae) Parasitizing “Coelenterates” (Cnidaria, Scyphozoa and Ctenophora) from Southeastern Brazil
BRAZILIAN JOURNAL OF OCEANOGRAPHY, 53(1/2):39-45, 2005 DIGENEAN METACERCARIA (TREMATODA, DIGENEA, LEPOCREADIIDAE) PARASITIZING “COELENTERATES” (CNIDARIA, SCYPHOZOA AND CTENOPHORA) FROM SOUTHEASTERN BRAZIL André Carrara Morandini1; Sergio Roberto Martorelli2; Antonio Carlos Marques1 & Fábio Lang da Silveira1 1Instituto de Biociências da Universidade de São Paulo Departamento de Zoologia (Caixa Postal 11461, 05422-970, São Paulo, SP, Brazil) 2Centro de Estudios Parasitologicos y Vectores (CEPAVE) (2 Nro. 584 (1900) La Plata, Argentina) e-mails: [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected] A B S T R A C T Metacercaria specimens of the genus Opechona (Trematoda: Digenea: Lepocreadiidae) are described parasitizing “coelenterates” (scyphomedusae and ctenophores) from Southeastern Brazil (São Paulo state). The worms are compared to other Opechona species occurring on the Brazilian coast, but no association has been made because only adult forms of these species have been described. Suppositions as to the possible transference of the parasites are made. R E S U M O Exemplares de metacercárias do gênero Opechona (Trematoda: Digenea: Lepocreadiidae) são descritos parasitando “celenterados” (cifomedusas e ctenóforos) no sudeste do Brasil (estado de São Paulo). Os vermes foram comparados a outras espécies de Opechona ocorrentes no litoral brasileiro, porém nenhuma associação foi realizada devido às demais espécies terem sido descritas a partir de exemplares adultos. São apresentadas suposições sobre as possíveis formas -
Shortnose Sucker (Chasmistes Brevirostris) 5-Year Review Summary and Evaluation
Shortnose Sucker (Chasmistes brevirostris) 5-Year Review Summary and Evaluation U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service Klamath Falls Fish and Wildlife Office Klamath Falls, Oregon July 2007 5-YEAR REVIEW Shortnose Sucker (Chasmistes brevirostris) TABLE OF CONTENTS 1.0 GENERAL INFORMATION.......................................................................................... 3 1.1. Reviewers............................................................................................................................ 3 1.2. Methodology used to complete the review....................................................................... 3 1.3. Background ........................................................................................................................ 3 2.0 REVIEW ANALYSIS....................................................................................................... 4 2.1. Application of the 1996 Distinct Populations Segment (DPS) policy ............................ 4 2.2. Biology and Habitat ........................................................................................................... 5 2.3. Recovery Criteria............................................................................................................. 13 2.4. Five-Factor Analysis ........................................................................................................ 16 2.5. Synthesis............................................................................................................................ 30 3.0 RESULTS ....................................................................................................................... -
Symbiosis (Symbiotic Relationship)
Symbiosis (Symbiotic Relationship) 1 In the wonderful world of nature, some animals love forming partnerships with other animal species, with plants, and with microorganisms. We have a special name for such interesting arrangements. We call it "symbiosis" that literally means "living together". 2 Do both species involved in a symbiotic relationship benefit from their partnership? Well, the question itself is open for debate. While some scientists restrict the meaning of symbiosis to a "win-win" situation for both participants, others disagree. Using a broader definition, we are going to explore the three types of symbiotic partnerships. 3 When two species engage in a mutually beneficial symbiotic relationship, they are in the so- called "mutualism" type of symbiosis. To understand mutualism better, let's examine the interaction between clown fish and an anemone. While most fish stay away from an anemone for fear of touching its poisonous tentacles, clown fish have a special coat on their skin that protects them from getting stung. (This trick does not work for all anemones though. Clown fish can only have symbiotic relationships with 10 of the 1,000 different anemone species in the world.) Swimming carefree and unharmed among their host's deadly tentacles, clown fish know very well that their predators do not dare to come near them. Plus, clown fish get to pick up and eat the leftover bits discarded by their landlord. What does the anemone get in return for offering clown fish a safe haven? Well, first and foremost, it kills and feeds on fish that are eyeing its tenant! Aside from that, clown fish pay their rent by cleaning up food scraps and dead anemone tentacles. -
Continental Slope Communities Tom Laidig
Continental Slope Communities Tom Laidig Summary and Introduction In the shallow coastal areas of the Gulf of the Farallones, as in other regions of the world, fishing pressure has increased and numbers of fish have decreased over the past few decades. As many fish stocks have declined, some fishermen have been forced to look elsewhere to fill their nets. Traditional fishing grounds in the gulf have been located on the Continental Shelf, a rather flat, relatively shallow area of the sea floor adjacent to the coast. At a depth of about 200 m (660 ft), the bottom starts to drop off more rapidly on what is called the Continental Slope. It is on upper and middle parts of this steeper slope that the new fishing grounds have been established. Because the fish inhabiting these deeper waters are less understood than those in shallower water, there is a danger of overharvesting, which could threaten the long- term viability of these newer fisheries. The deep waters of the Continental Slope are characterized by nearly freezing temperatures, extremely low light conditions, and very high pressures. Because of the cold, organisms that live at these depths have slower metabolisms—they eat less frequently, are slower in digesting their food, and move and grow more slowly. They also attain greater ages than their counterparts that live in shallower waters—some deep-sea rockfish live more than 70 years. Many of the animals living in the perpetual darkness of the Continental Slope have developed light-producing organs. These serve various functions, such as communicating with members of their own kind (as in courtship), attracting food (like attracting moths to a flame), and avoiding being eaten (flashing a light in a predator’s eyes can give an animal a chance to get away). -
Arhynchobdellida (Annelida: Oligochaeta: Hirudinida): Phylogenetic Relationships and Evolution
MOLECULAR PHYLOGENETICS AND EVOLUTION Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution 30 (2004) 213–225 www.elsevier.com/locate/ympev Arhynchobdellida (Annelida: Oligochaeta: Hirudinida): phylogenetic relationships and evolution Elizabeth Bordaa,b,* and Mark E. Siddallb a Department of Biology, Graduate School and University Center, City University of New York, New York, NY, USA b Division of Invertebrate Zoology, American Museum of Natural History, New York, NY, USA Received 15 July 2003; revised 29 August 2003 Abstract A remarkable diversity of life history strategies, geographic distributions, and morphological characters provide a rich substrate for investigating the evolutionary relationships of arhynchobdellid leeches. The phylogenetic relationships, using parsimony anal- ysis, of the order Arhynchobdellida were investigated using nuclear 18S and 28S rDNA, mitochondrial 12S rDNA, and cytochrome c oxidase subunit I sequence data, as well as 24 morphological characters. Thirty-nine arhynchobdellid species were selected to represent the seven currently recognized families. Sixteen rhynchobdellid leeches from the families Glossiphoniidae and Piscicolidae were included as outgroup taxa. Analysis of all available data resolved a single most-parsimonious tree. The cladogram conflicted with most of the traditional classification schemes of the Arhynchobdellida. Monophyly of the Erpobdelliformes and Hirudini- formes was supported, whereas the families Haemadipsidae, Haemopidae, and Hirudinidae, as well as the genera Hirudo or Ali- olimnatis, were found not to be monophyletic. The results provide insight on the phylogenetic positions for the taxonomically problematic families Americobdellidae and Cylicobdellidae, the genera Semiscolex, Patagoniobdella, and Mesobdella, as well as genera traditionally classified under Hirudinidae. The evolution of dietary and habitat preferences is examined. Ó 2003 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved. -
Myzopodidae: Chiroptera) from Western Madagascar
ARTICLE IN PRESS www.elsevier.de/mambio Original investigation The description of a new species of Myzopoda (Myzopodidae: Chiroptera) from western Madagascar By S.M. Goodman, F. Rakotondraparany and A. Kofoky Field Museum of Natural History, Chicago, USA and WWF, Antananarivo, De´partement de Biologie Animale, Universite´ d’Antananarivo, Antananarivo, Madagasikara Voakajy, Antananarivo, Madagascar Receipt of Ms. 6.2.2006 Acceptance of Ms. 2.8.2006 Abstract A new species of Myzopoda (Myzopodidae), an endemic family to Madagascar that was previously considered to be monospecific, is described. This new species, M. schliemanni, occurs in the dry western forests of the island and is notably different in pelage coloration, external measurements and cranial characters from M. aurita, the previously described species, from the humid eastern forests. Aspects of the biogeography of Myzopoda and its apparent close association with the plant Ravenala madagascariensis (Family Strelitziaceae) are discussed in light of possible speciation mechanisms that gave rise to eastern and western species. r 2006 Deutsche Gesellschaft fu¨r Sa¨ugetierkunde. Published by Elsevier GmbH. All rights reserved. Key words: Myzopoda, Madagascar, new species, biogeography Introduction Recent research on the mammal fauna of speciation molecular studies have been very Madagascar has and continues to reveal informative to resolve questions of species remarkable discoveries. A considerable num- limits (e.g., Olson et al. 2004; Yoder et al. ber of new small mammal and primate 2005). The bat fauna of the island is no species have been described in recent years exception – until a decade ago these animals (Goodman et al. 2003), and numerous remained largely under studied and ongoing other mammals, known to taxonomists, surveys and taxonomic work have revealed await formal description. -
Alexander 2013 Principles-Of-Animal-Locomotion.Pdf
.................................................... Principles of Animal Locomotion Principles of Animal Locomotion ..................................................... R. McNeill Alexander PRINCETON UNIVERSITY PRESS PRINCETON AND OXFORD Copyright © 2003 by Princeton University Press Published by Princeton University Press, 41 William Street, Princeton, New Jersey 08540 In the United Kingdom: Princeton University Press, 3 Market Place, Woodstock, Oxfordshire OX20 1SY All Rights Reserved Second printing, and first paperback printing, 2006 Paperback ISBN-13: 978-0-691-12634-0 Paperback ISBN-10: 0-691-12634-8 The Library of Congress has cataloged the cloth edition of this book as follows Alexander, R. McNeill. Principles of animal locomotion / R. McNeill Alexander. p. cm. Includes bibliographical references (p. ). ISBN 0-691-08678-8 (alk. paper) 1. Animal locomotion. I. Title. QP301.A2963 2002 591.47′9—dc21 2002016904 British Library Cataloging-in-Publication Data is available This book has been composed in Galliard and Bulmer Printed on acid-free paper. ∞ pup.princeton.edu Printed in the United States of America 1098765432 Contents ............................................................... PREFACE ix Chapter 1. The Best Way to Travel 1 1.1. Fitness 1 1.2. Speed 2 1.3. Acceleration and Maneuverability 2 1.4. Endurance 4 1.5. Economy of Energy 7 1.6. Stability 8 1.7. Compromises 9 1.8. Constraints 9 1.9. Optimization Theory 10 1.10. Gaits 12 Chapter 2. Muscle, the Motor 15 2.1. How Muscles Exert Force 15 2.2. Shortening and Lengthening Muscle 22 2.3. Power Output of Muscles 26 2.4. Pennation Patterns and Moment Arms 28 2.5. Power Consumption 31 2.6. Some Other Types of Muscle 34 Chapter 3. -
Review Article
Review Article Leech Therapeutic Applications A. M. ABDUALKADER*, A. M. GHAWI1, M. ALAAMA, M. AWANG AND A. MERZOUK2 Departments of Pharmaceutical Chemistry, and 1Basic Medical Science, Faculty of Pharmacy, International Islamic University Malaysia, Jalan Istana, 25200 Kuantan, Pahang, Malaysia, 2Biopep Solutions Inc., 235-11590 Cambie Road, Richmond, BC V6X 3Z5, Canada Abdualkader, et al.: Leeching Hematophagous animals including leeches have been known to possess biologically active compounds in their secretions, especially in their saliva. The blood‑sucking annelids, leeches have been used for therapeutic purposes since the beginning of civilization. Ancient Egyptian, Indian, Greek and Arab physicians used leeches for a wide range of diseases starting from the conventional use for bleeding to systemic ailments, such as skin diseases, nervous system abnormalities, urinary and reproductive system problems, inflammation, and dental problems. Recently, extensive researches on leech saliva unveiled the presence of a variety of bioactive peptides and proteins involving antithrombin (hirudin, bufrudin), antiplatelet (calin, saratin), factor Xa inhibitors (lefaxin), antibacterial (theromacin, theromyzin) and others. Consequently, leech has made a comeback as a new remedy for many chronic and life‑threatening abnormalities, such as cardiovascular problems, cancer, metastasis, and infectious diseases. In the 20th century, leech therapy has established itself in plastic and microsurgery as a protective tool against venous congestion and served -
Bloodlines: Mammals, Leeches, and Conservation in Southern Asia
Page 17 of 37 Systematics and Biodiversity 1 2 3 4 Bloodlines: mammals, leeches, and conservation in 5 6 7 southern Asia 8 9 10 1,2,3 4 3 11 MICHAEL TESSLER , SARAH R. WEISKOPF , LILY BERNIKER , REBECCA 12 13 HERSCH2, KYLE P. McCARTHY4, DOUGLAS W. YU5,6 & MARK E. SIDDALL1,2,3 14 15 16 17 1 18 Richard Gilder Graduate School, American Museum of Natural History, Central Park West at 19 20 79th Street, New York, NY 10024, USA 21 22 2Sackler Institute for Comparative Genomics, American Museum of Natural History, Central 23 24 25 Park West at 79th Street, New York, NY 10024, USA 26 3 27 Division of Invertebrate Zoology, American Museum of Natural History, Central Park West at 28 29 79th Street, New York, NY 10024, USA 30 31 4Department of Entomology and Wildlife Ecology, University of Delaware, 531 South College 32 33 34 Avenue, Newark, DE 19716, USA 35 36 5State Key Laboratory of Genetic Resources and Evolution, Kunming Institute of Zoology, 32 37 38 Jiaochang Dong Lu, Kunming, Yunnan 650223, China 39 40 6 41 School of Biological Sciences, University of East Anglia, Norwich Research Park, Norwich, 42 43 Norfolk NR4 7TJ UK 44 45 46 47 48 Running title: Mammals, leeches, and conservation 49 50 Correspondence to: Michael Tessler. E-mail: [email protected] 51 52 Southern Asia is a biodiversity hotspot both for terrestrial mammals and for leeches. Many 53 54 small-mammal groups are under-studied in this region, while other mammals are of known 55 56 57 58 59 60 URL: http://mc.manuscriptcentral.com/tsab Tessler et al.