"Down with the Church" a Conspiracy Unmasked

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

D OwN WITH THE i^riUK\^n A ConspiraLcy Unmasked THE LIBRARY OF THE UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA LOS ANGELES "DOWN WITH THE CHURCH" "DOWN WITH THE CHURCH" A CONSPIRACY UNMASKED BY J. L. WALTON, BA. SECOND EDITION LONDON: GEORGE ALLEN & SONS 156, CHARING CROSS ROAD 1908 [AH rights reserved] Printed by Ballantyne, Hanson &^ Co. At the Ballantyne Press, Edinburgh 3X CONTENTS PAOK Foreword I What is the Free Church Council ? 13 A Political Campaign . 23 Have Dissenters a Grievance? 36 Passive Resistance 47 Unconcealed Venom . 66 Scandals on the Clergy . 84 The Reliability of Statistics . 103 Shall it be Secularism? . 1x8 The Results of Secularism 129 Is Dissent Decaying ? . 146 Inconsistency 161 Nonconformist Protests . 179 Must Christian Education Go ? 201 What is Undenominationalism? 217 The Apostacy of Dissent . 226 Do Nonconformists Stand for Liberty 235 Is a Solution Possible ? . 246 Are the Free Churches Free? 256 What the Church has Done for Education 264 Afterword 272 Appendices 277 Index 28Q ;2 " Perhaps it is the very strangeness of the tactics which are used against them which make Churchmen bhnd to the dangers which surround them now. "There are the efforts perpetually made by Dissenters to appropriate in a greater or less degree the educational institutions of the Church. "The attack has been conceived with terrible ingenuity, and will doubtless be carried on with all the energy the enemies of the Church know how to command. Its results will depend upon the spirit which Churchmen shall display. Dissensions may open to it the door of success, and pro- duce calamities of which no man living shall see the close. Union and energy, and a subordination of every other motive to the one great end, will baffle it for ever." The above sentences are taken from an article in the Quarterly Review of July 1865. Its author, it is now known, was an earnest Churchman and a great statesman — the late Lord Salisbury. DOWN WITH THE CHURCH FORKWORD Ir is always difiicult to bring oncsell to face unpleasant facts, and where religion is con- cerned one naturally hesitates to ascribe to others conduct and behaviour which does not appear in consonance with Christian principles. On these grounds, Churchmen have ever been loth to realise that amongst the body of Dis- senters around them, who were obviously in serious earnest as Christian members of the community, there has always existed a hostility against the Church —a hostility so deep and bitter as to entertain for its iinal cause the —absolute destruction of the National Church " Down with the Church ; down with it, even unto the ground." It is so to-day. By way of olTering some excuse for this strangelv unchristian spirit, a book was com- piled by Rev. C. Silvester Home in 1903, which he entitled " A History of the Free Churches" —a book which is not history at all, but only an ex parte statement intended to show that Dissenters have all along from the days of their origin been the champions of civil and religious liberty against the narrow repression and cruelty of an overweening Church. A 2 Down with the Church On the other hand, it does not require much knowledge of history to show indisputably that Dissenters have never been on the side of free- dom, except freedom for themselves. They have never waged a magnanimous warfare ; they have never struggled for their country's good ; their views have never been liberal and generous, but always narrow and selfish. At such times as they were in the ascendant, so far from according to others that civil and religious liberty for which they professed to have struggled, they exhibited to all who dif- fered from them a refinement of cruelty and tyranny that has no parallel in the history of religion, unless it be the Roman Inquisition in the darkness of the Middle Ages. The fact cannot be controverted : twenty years of dominance caused the Dissenters literally to stink in the nostrils of the nation. When they had the opportunity to grant to others that civil and religious freedom and liberty for which they professed to have struggled, they mani- fested on all hands such intolerable bigotry and exclusiveness that the people, instead of hailing them as the saviours of the nation, rose up and hurled them from place and power, and eventu- ally placed them under legal ban as pests and nuisances to their fellow-men. Nothing will ever clean from off the scutcheon of Dissent the blots of the seventeenth century. In the eighteenth century little is heard of them, save as stragglers ; but when we reach the enlightenment of the nineteenth century, with the removal of disabilities. Dissent rises from its ashes, only, however, to oppose the Church. The principal feature of Church activity in the Foreword 3 first half of the nineteenth century was the keen struggle on behalf of the education of the children of the working classes — an activity opposed at every turn by the obstruction of Dissent. The extraordinary commercial prosperity that dawned upon the country with the advent of Queen Victoria to the throne, resulted in an abnormal exodus from the country side to the various manufacturing centres. Vast aggre- gates of people came together completely para- lysing the efforts of a half-awakening Church. It was the Dissenters' opportunity ; and they must have every credit for doing vast work for souls in a thousand humble ways. But they no sooner became conscious of their growing strength than there broke out the old birth sin of hostility to the Church. They could not rest content to work in their own vineyard in their own free way, but must needs peer over the hedge at their neighbours' vines, and seized with desire to destroy the walls thereof, and the winepress therein, they meet together under the presiding genius of one called Miall, a member of the Parliament of Westminster. An association was formed in 1844, entitled the " Anti- State -Church Association," Mr. Miall, the founder, affirming that to destroy the Church of England " and give the dust of it to the four winds of heaven, is the sacred mission of Protestant Dissenting ministers." The title of this association was subsequently improved into the " Liberation Society " —in which specious title it still delights to revel. The only thing really noticeable about the Society is that it has never been a success ; its 4 Down with the Church coffers h;ive never overflowed ; its numbers have never swelled unduly ; but it has dragged through a lingering and violent existence, which, at any rate, has served to keep alive the flame of hostility to the Church in the ever-increasing ranks of Protestant Dissenting leaders. Its chief signs of life since its ques- tionable nativity have been crass misrepresenta- tion, and unconscionable virulence. Its financial status has by no means been commensurate with the ambitious nature of its programme, which was set out in full in the pages of the Financial Reform Almanac for the year 1885. A reference to Appendix " A " will show that its aims constitute a resurrection in detail of the self-same spirit of wholesale robbery, plunder, and oppression that disgraced for ever the transactions of that unconstitutional and persistent Puritan assembly known in our history as the Long Parliament. The spirit of the whole programme is, " Down with tiie Church ; down with it, even to the ground." The direct assault upon the Church proved a failure at every turn ; but failure only seemed to brace the nerves for another and more subtle form of attack. It became evident that so long as the Church had the children, she had the country in the hollow of her hand. The atmosphere of the Elementary Schools predisposed the youthful mind to look up to the Church as the lawful representative of religion, and to regard Dissent as something outside, unnecessary and wrong. It must be remembered that the education of the children of the working classes during the Foreword 5 first seventy years of the nineteenth century had been left almost entirely to the care and energy of the Church, upwards of 73 per cent, of the children attending school being under her guardianship, when the momentous Bill of 1870 was brought into Parliament. Now it is to be noticed that Mr. Forster's attempt to establish something like a national system of education with due facilities and privileges to supplement and complete the work of the various voluntary associations, was met with unrelenting opposition on the part of Dissenters, and a strenuous effort was made to secure that the education offered in the State Schools should be on lines entirely secular. Failing in this, they managed to secure a pro- vision that in the religious instruction that was provided there should be no use of any formu- lary or catechism distinctive of any religious body. What the Government intended by this provision was made perfectly clear by the late Lord Salisbury in a speech delivered in the Limehouse Town Hall on March 21, 1895, and there is reasonable ground for supposing that if the provision had been carried out in accordance with the genuine intentions of the Government, an amicable working arrangement would have been reached which should have given satisfaction to Churchmen and Dissenters alike. But the Dissenters' opportunity had arrived. They suddenly developed a hitherto carefully-concealed passion for education, and everywhere struggled for seats on the Council of the School Boards : everywhere they began to agitate for the creation of School Boards even in districts where, owing to the ample facilities 6 Down with the Church afforded by the Voluntary Schools, no further provision was required.
Recommended publications
  • Archives & Library Newsletter Issue 59 – Summer 2019
    Newsletter Canterbury Cathedral Archives and Library William Somner Conference and Exhibition The eagerly-awaited one-day conference and exhibition marking the 350th anniversary of William Somner’s death in 1669 took place on 23rd March 2019, with over 50 people attending the highly successful and enjoyable event. Here was an opportunity to learn much more about one of Canterbury’s - and England’s - greatest scholars, the author of The Antiquities of Canterbury and compiler of the first Anglo-Saxon/Latin/English Dictionary, as well being the energetic registrar of Canterbury’s Consistory Court and Cathedral Auditor in the time of Archbishop Laud. Meeting at the Cathedral Archives and Library, the day was launched by Cressida Williams (Head of Archives and Library) who introduced us to a varied display of material relating to Somner, selected by Dr David Wright and Dr David Shaw and containing a number of volumes associated with the scholar, together with contemporary manuscripts which dwelt on his connections with the Cathedral and his life in Canterbury. Among some fascinating items, it was rewarding to note the survival of the diminutive receipt the Cathedral obtained from Somner’s widow on the purchase of his library - for £100 8s 0d! Examining a superb 17th century map of the Cathedral’s water system enabled one to pinpoint Somner’s exact dwelling in premises long since demolished. As a bonus, the opportunity was also offered by Fawn Todd (Cathedral Librarian) for attendees to view a display of unusual and attractive historic bindings in the Howley-Harrison Library. 1 NewsletterNewsletter 59 49 | | Summer Summer 2019 2011 William Somner Day (continued) Continuing at the Old Sessions House, Christ Church University, we were welcomed by Dr David Wright, whose two-part life of Somner will be published in the 2019 and 2020 volumes of Archaeologia Cantiana.
    [Show full text]
  • National Archdeacons' Forum Mailing
    NATIONAL ARCHDEACONS’ FORUM serving the Church of England and the Church in Wales Archdeacons’ News Bulletin no. 28 October 2017 from Norman Boakes Archdeacons’ National Executive Officer For those who have enjoyed the Lindchester Chronicles with their clear reflection in fiction of so much truth about the Church of England, the publication of Catherine Fox’s third and final volume in the series will be much welcomed. Realms of Glory introduces us to a second archdeacon to fill the long vacancy alongside Matt - though he is about to move on to other things. Cathy plays again with the stereotype of the archdeacon in her character of the Ven Bea Whitchurch, and because Bea knits she tries to compare her to Madame Defarge at the guillotine. But “No. It’s no good. Even as I wrote that, I could hear Bea hooting with laughter. Bea doesn’t really have a wrong side. Obviously, she’s capable of being firm when required, and now and then of getting pretty cross. But it’s becoming clear to me that once again I have failed to present you with an archidiaconal monster.” As in her previous novels, Cathy explores the realities of humanity, our frailties, our hopes, our fears, the burdens we carry from the past and need to work with, and how people of faith seek to live and grow with all this reality. She does it with a gentle touch, and shows how so often it is love which transforms things, a love which engages, challenges, sometimes suffers, and perseveres. It may be fiction, but like all good fiction it reflects human life and gives us insight into faith.
    [Show full text]
  • The Canterbury Association
    The Canterbury Association (1848-1852): A Study of Its Members’ Connections By the Reverend Michael Blain Note: This is a revised edition prepared during 2019, of material included in the book published in 2000 by the archives committee of the Anglican diocese of Christchurch to mark the 150th anniversary of the Canterbury settlement. In 1850 the first Canterbury Association ships sailed into the new settlement of Lyttelton, New Zealand. From that fulcrum year I have examined the lives of the eighty-four members of the Canterbury Association. Backwards into their origins, and forwards in their subsequent careers. I looked for connections. The story of the Association’s plans and the settlement of colonial Canterbury has been told often enough. (For instance, see A History of Canterbury volume 1, pp135-233, edited James Hight and CR Straubel.) Names and titles of many of these men still feature in the Canterbury landscape as mountains, lakes, and rivers. But who were the people? What brought these eighty-four together between the initial meeting on 27 March 1848 and the close of their operations in September 1852? What were the connections between them? In November 1847 Edward Gibbon Wakefield had convinced an idealistic young Irishman John Robert Godley that in partnership they could put together the best of all emigration plans. Wakefield’s experience, and Godley’s contacts brought together an association to promote a special colony in New Zealand, an English society free of industrial slums and revolutionary spirit, an ideal English society sustained by an ideal church of England. Each member of these eighty-four members has his biographical entry.
    [Show full text]
  • Church Bells Vol 19 (Bells and Bell Ringing)
    8 Church Bells. [December 7, 1888. of the Hindu religion ia so deep, and the immorality and vices of both Hindus and Mohammedans are so revolting, that the need for Christianity BELLS AND BELL-RINGING. is more patent than I had any conception of until I saw with my own eyes and heard on the spot with my own ears; yet the Indian mind, though now with most degraded objects and theories of worship, is es­ The Bells of Whaplode Parish Church. sentially a reverent and religious mind. To win India to Christianity is O n November 19th the bells of Whaplode Parish Church were rededicated not a hopeless task, if only enthusiasm at home were strong enough by the Lord Bishop of Lincoln, after having been rehung with extensive to multiply the army of workers tenfold, and to send men of such quality repairs to the belfry. as those now at Delhi and IJeshawur.’ The bells are five in number, and on them are the following inscrip­ tions;—1. ‘Laudo Deum Verum. Henricus Penn Fusor. 1718,’ 2. ‘ It Clamor ad caelos. 1718.’ 3. ‘ IJfc mundus sic nos, nunc laetitiam nunc dolorem. 1718.’ 4. ‘ Plebemvoco. Congrego clerum. Iae. Bolton. Guls. INDIAN HOMES IN ALGOMA, One. C.W.S. 1718.’ 5. Defunctos plango, vivos moneo. Ioh. Bustat, (From the 1 Canadian Church Magazine.') vicar. 1718.’ 'The writings of the Rev: E. E. Wilson, of the diocese of Algoma, re­ I t appears that John Bustat, the vicar, appointed James Bolton his garding Indian life are valuable as studies in ethnology and archaeology; churchwarden, at a vestry meeting held 14th April, 1718, and the parishioners appointed W illiam One (Owen) theirs.
    [Show full text]
  • National Archdeacons' Forum
    THE ARCHDEACONS’ FORUM for the Church of England and the Church in Wales So you’re going to be an Archdeacon… A booklet for new archdeacons in the Church of England April 2019 1 What is The Archdeacons’ Forum? The Archdeacons’ Forum exists to serve all archdeacons in the Church of England and Church in Wales, including the military archdeacons and the Deans of the Channel Islands. It was originally formed in 1991 to co-ordinate the work of archdeacons and provide support, training and development for them. The current chair is the Ven Stephen Taylor, Archdeacon of Maidstone and the Vice- Chair is the Ven Fiona Windsor, Archdeacon of Horsham. The Forum Executive consists of archdeacons elected from each of the English archidiaconal regions and from the archdeacons of the Church in Wales, together a representative of the archdeacons to HM Forces. We have pages on the national Church of England website. To access these, please go to: https://www.churchofengland.org/more/diocesan- resources/archdeacons-forum All archdeacons are also part of regional meetings, and you will be contacted and invited to join these. They are very useful gatherings for support and sharing. In 2010, a report on the continuing ministerial development of archdeacons was commissioned by the Forum and this was published in 2011. A copy of this report Sustaining Leaders in Mission and Change will be sent to you with this booklet. It is also available on our pages on the national Church of England website (see above). The Forum organises two regular events for Archdeacons: • A New Archdeacons’ Conference, designed for those who are about to or who have recently taken up appointment.
    [Show full text]
  • In the Commissary Court of the Diocese of Canterbury
    IN THE COMMISSARY COURT OF THE DIOCESE OF CANTERBURY IN RE ST. MARY THE BLESSED VIRGIN, EASTRY _____________________________ JUDGMENT _____________________________ INTRODUCTION 1. The Petitioners,1 by a petition for a confirmatory faculty, seek authorisation of the following matters: (1) Replacement of lead stolen on 5th June 2011 and 9th July 2011 with artificial non-metal roofing material known as “Ubiflex” (2) Further stripping of remaining lead from roofs and replacement of the same with “Ubiflex” (3) Sale of the lead removed from the roofs as a result of (2) above to a registered metal dealer. 2. The background to this case is the all too familiar tale of the theft of lead from the Church roof. Sometime in around 2008-9 four bays of lead were stolen from the 1 The Revd Canon Mark Roberts, Mr Peter Franklin and Mr Robert Barwick. Mr Barwick was substituted as a Petitioner with the leave of the Court on 12th September 2012. ME.1277 north aisle of the Church. These bays were replaced by the Parish with lead, having received settlement in full from Ecclesiastical Insurance. 3. Mark Hill QC Ch observed in the conjoined cases of St Michael and All Angels, Bexhill, All Saints, Danehill, St Matthew, St Leonards-on-Sea, St Mary, Balcombe and St John the Evangelist, Upper St Leonards (16th November 2011- ’The Chichester cases’): “As the First Epistle of Paul to the Thessalonians reminds us (Ch.5 v.2), thieves tend to come in the night, or at least when they are not expected.”2 Thieves apparently came on the night of 4th-5th June 2011 and they were followed by a downpour of rain.
    [Show full text]
  • Choral Evensong with Installations and Commissioning
    THE CATHEDRAL AND METROPOLITICAL CHURCH OF CHRIST, CANTERBURY Choral Evensong with Installations and Commissioning Sunday 27th September 2020 5.30pm Nave Welcome to Canterbury Cathedral for this Service Canterbury Cathedral is the seat of the Archbishop of Canterbury, the cathedral church of the Diocese of Canterbury, the mother church of the Anglican Communion, and a place of pilgrimage welcoming visitors from across the world. For your safety Please keep social distance at all times Please stay in your seat as much as possible Please use hand sanitiser on the way in and out Please avoid touching your face and touching surfaces Cover Image: The west elevation of Canterbury Cathedral As part of our commitment to the care of the environment in our world, this Order of Service is printed on unbleached 100% recycled paper Please ensure that mobile phones are switched off. No form of visual or sound recording, or any form of photography, is permitted during Services. Thank you for your co-operation. An induction loop system for the hard of hearing is installed in the Cathedral. Hearing aid users should adjust their aid to T. Large print orders of service are available from the stewards and virgers. Please ask. Some material included in this service is copyright: © The Archbishops' Council 2000 © The Crown/Cambridge University Press: The Book of Common Prayer (1662) Hymns and songs reproduced under CCLI number: 1031280 Produced by the Music & Liturgy Department: [email protected] 01227 865281 www.canterbury-cathedral.org ORDER OF SERVICE Stand as the procession enters the Nave The Dean welcomes the congregation The Precentor and choir sing the Preces O Lord, open thou our lips and our mouth shall shew forth thy praise.
    [Show full text]
  • A Private View of Public Schools by Mark Draisey
    No. 21 • Lent 2015 News of OKS from the French The Truemans – A King’s School Obituaries – including Arnaud Resistance to ‘the Canterbury Scene’ family and the Great War de Borchgrave, Peter van Berckel, to the architectural scenery of York p14 Bill McNicoll and Nicola Morgan p2 p9 Image taken from Thirty Years On!: A Private View of Public Schools by Mark Draisey p5 Draisey Mark Photo: Lent 2015.indd 1 15/04/2015 09:52:50 news of OKs News of OKS includes requests 1940s Peace, an 80 ft. deep crater that for memories of King’s, and resulted from 500 feet of tunnelling for secondhand sports kit for John Allchurch (SH 1943-48) endeavour from British lines, is one disadvantaged youngsters, enjoyed the pictures of the School of the places depicted in a fine set and OKS engagement and House Reunion and recalls how Fred’s of photographs we have been sent. wedding photos. Contact Elaine connection with AL Rowse helped him Lynch (see below) with your to an Exhibition at St Edmund Hall, news or fill in the form on p16 Oxford. Subsequently John passed out top at Mons (the CCF has his stick) and became 2nd Lt RA before volunteering for the Denbighshire and Caernarvon Yeomanry. Later life took him through Procter and Gamble and on to running his own business. He is hoping to get all of this down in a book, besides describing his family of four children and thirteen grandchildren. 1950s KEnT robinson (MO 1951-55) responded to the account of Sebastian * Barker’s 1st XV captaincy in 1962 Nevill Swanson (GR 1951-55) and 1963 by recalling “our own reminded Daily Telegraph readers efforts in 1955” which were “not too (10.9.14) that his great-grandfather shabby for we also played many of Donald Swanson, who was the the most powerful rugby schools..
    [Show full text]
  • Canterbury Diocesan Synod 2018 - 2021
    Canterbury Diocesan Synod Guide August 2018 – July 2021 Incorporating: • Diocesan Objectives & Strategy • Membership and Structure of Synod • Standing Orders • List of Officers 1 2 Diocesan Objectives & Strategy In all its mission and ministry the Diocese of Canterbury is committed to the following three overriding objectives: • To grow the church numerically and spiritually • To re-imagine ministry • To build partnerships that enrich communities The structures of the diocese are designed to facilitate the achievement of these objectives into four key ‘Frameworks’: • Children, Schools and Young People • Local Church Development • Licensed Ministries • Communities and Partnership These frameworks replaced the traditional concept of Boards and Committees and represent a flexible way of working for the Diocese with communication and collaboration at its heart. Under these objectives the Diocese has formulated the strategy of ‘Changed Lives ► Changing Lives’. As part of this strategy we hold to the following specific goals: • Becoming more connected and mission focussed in prayer • Becoming more diverse: especially welcoming young people and those from deprived areas in our congregations • Offering more courageous leadership to lead the Church in mission in a rapidly changing culture To do this we will hold to the following values: • Listening to God and to one another • Celebrating what is good • Taking risks • Promoting every member ministry • Letting the edge shape the centre by being attentive to those on the edge of our communities Accordingly we have currently identified 5 major project strands • Building a missional prayer network • Engaging with areas of deprivation – at first through the expansion of the Ignite project • Prioritising Young People • Enriching Leadership • Building Missional Learning Communities 3 1.
    [Show full text]
  • PARISH NEWS Issue 1
    Easter 2021 Volume 16 2021 PARISH NEWS Issue 1 Welcome Anthea Deanery Synod Now that Andrew has taken up his post as substantive Since the beginning of the year, Deanery Synod and the Archdeacon of Maidstone, St Paul’s has been officially Mission and Ministry Committee have been hugely in interregnum since he left at the end of September active. The diocese of Canterbury has asked all last year. This has left us rather in limbo, but with deaneries to consider a document called ‘Shaping Our Anthea in training we had high hopes for the future. Life for a Flourishing Future’ and we have been given very tight timelines in which to consider and submit our In the event, our prayers have been answered as we responses. Essentially, the diocese is asking us to recently had confirmation that after her ordination in consider a radical reorganisation motivated by two July, Anthea will be our new curate! Her official title is important factors: the need to rethink our mission Assistant Curate in the St Paul’s benefice and Minister strategies and the need to find ways to operate more in Secular Employment but I don’t think we have to use economically. Needless to say, this is a very delicate all those words when we speak to her. balancing act and requires a great deal of cooperation Welcome Anthea! among the churches in the deanery as well as a Mark Turner preparedness (possibly) to let go some of the things which we may hold very dear. However, the potential changes are not being imposed on us ‘from above’; we An Update from Anthea have a good deal of agency, as a parish and in the wider deanery, to shape our own future and create a I am getting towards the end of my intense, three-year sustainable missional reach across our town.
    [Show full text]
  • Commissary General Re ASHFORD, St. Mary the Virgin Faculty Petition
    IN THE COMMISSARY COURT OF THE DIOCESE OF CANTERBURY His Honour Richard Walker – Commissary General Re ASHFORD, St. Mary the Virgin Faculty Petition of 6th December 2009 and Further Supplemental Petition dated 30th March 2010* Major internal reordering; including Provision of performance and exhibition space Removal of nave pews & platforms New Floor New enlarged nave dais Moving the pulpit to the opposite side of the nave Small toilet extension to the vestry *Ground source heat pump & Rainwater harvesting tank PETITIONERS: The Revd. Colin George Preece, Robert Austin Blount & Anthony Hurd AND Ashford Borough Council AND Ashford’s Future Limited PARTIES OPPONENT: (1) The Victorian Society & (2) Christopher Cooper JUDGMENT 1. The Parish Church of St Mary the Virgin is a major Grade 1 building and a landmark structure in heart of the historic part of the town centre in Ashford. Ashford lost much of its historic townscape during the Second World War and was subsequently drastically altered by a new road system, which has left the 1 Church and its surroundings as a significant enclave surviving from the historic old town. The fine Church is surrounded and framed by a square of generally small old properties with a footpath running all round it and a delightful absence of motor traffic. 2. Because I was anxious to assist the Parties in providing them with a clear ruling on these Petitions, as early as was possible, I handed down a brief “Summary-Form Judgment” on 1st June 2010, indicating that I was granting these Petitions and would give full reasons for my decision later.
    [Show full text]
  • The Archdeacon of Maidstone
    The Archdeacon of Maidstone The Venerable Stephen Taylor MBE The Archdeaconry, 4 Redcliffe Lane, Maidstone, Kent ME14 2AG Tel: 01622 200 221 Email: [email protected] www.canterburydiocese.org December 2012 Dear Colleagues, Parochial Fees The Diocese recognises the significant ministry that the church offers to those preparing for marriage and those facing bereavement - thank you for this often unseen ‘alongside ministry’ with people in their deepest needs and all that you give. The pastoral significance of this ministry is neither separate from the church’s mission or our diocesan priorities but integral to them. Neither is it separate from significant debate about the income that comes with these occasional offices. This letter is to bring you up to date with recent National and Diocesan decisions about Parochial Fees from 2013. Some guidance notes by way of FAQs are available on the national CofE website. Our own diocese will have our own FAQ sheet which will be available on our website. A National Inclusive Fee Principle As you will have already seen the new fees table shows significant increases for the occasional office for 2013 with a small percentage increase for 2014 (already agreed). The increased fees payable to the PCC (e.g. weddings from £126 this year to £206 in 2013) are now inclusive of administration and the use of the church, although a voluntary donation can be invited. The advertised fee is intended to include all that is necessary for the service. Extras would include organist*, bells ringers, additional heating, flowers etc. and all these ‘extras’ could be said ‘no’ to and the service still take place.
    [Show full text]