DOCSLIB.ORG

Cumulative Awards

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text

Load more

Cumulative Listing of Award Winners, 1999 - 2012 Harrison White Outstanding Book Award David R. Heise, “Expressive Order: Confirming Outstanding Publications Awards Sentiments in Social Actions.” Springer, 2007. From 1999 to 2003, one award publication was given yearly, for either a book or an article. 2009 Since 2004, there have been two publication awards: Outstanding Article AwardDaniel J. Dellaposta the Outstanding Article Award (given every year) and the Harrison White Outstanding Book Award (given Damon Canola and Michael Macy. "Complex every other year) Contagions and Weakness of Long Ties" American Journal of Sociology, 2007, 3:702-34. 2016 Outstanding Article Award Honorable Mention: Daniel J. DellaPosta, Yongren Shi, and Michael Macy. Vincent Buskens and Arnout van de Rijt. "Dynamics “Why Do Liberals Drink Lattes?” American Journal of of Networks if Everyone Strives for Structural Holes" Sociology, 2015. 120: 1473-1511. American Journal of Sociology, 2008, 4:371-407. Harrison White Outstanding Book Award 2008 Dean Lusher, Johan Koskinen, and Garry Robins. Outstanding Article Award “Exponential Random Graph Models for Social Delia Baldassarri & Peter Bearman “Dynamics of Networks.” Cambridge University Press. 2013. Political Polarization” American Sociological Review 72:784-811, 2007. 2014 Outstanding Article Award 2007 Harrison White Outstanding Book Award Gianluca Manzo. "Educational choices and social Patrick Doreian, Vladimir Batagelj & Anuska Ferligoj interactions: a formal model and a computational ”Generalized Block Modeling, Cambridge University test.” Comparative Social Research. 2013. 30: 47-100. Press, 2005. 2013 Outstanding Article Award Outstanding Article Award James Kitts, “Collective Action, Rival Incentives, and the Emergences of Antisocial Norms” American Lincoln Quillian. “Segregation and Poverty Sociological Review, 2006, 71:235-259. Concentration: The Role of Three Segregations” American Sociological Review, 2012, 77: 354-379. 2006 Outstanding Article Award Harrison White Outstanding Book Award Damon Centola, Robb Willer, Michael Macy “The Noah Friedkin and Eugene Johnsen, “Social Influence Emperors Dilemma: a Computational Model of Self- Network Theory: A Sociological Examination of Small Enforcing Norms” American Journal of Sociology, Group Dynamics.” Cambridge University Press, 2011. 2005, 110(4):1009-1040. 2012 Harrison White Outstanding Book Award Outstanding Article Award Peter J. Carrington, John Scott & Stanley Wasserman (Editors) Andrews Wimmer and Kevin Lewis. “Beyond and Models and Methods in Social Network Analysis. Below Racial Homophily: ERG Models of a Cambridge University Press, 2005. Friendship Network Documented on Facebook” American Journal of Sociology, 2010, 116: 583-642. 2005 Outstanding Article Award 2011 Douglas Heckathorn & Matthew J. Salganik Outstanding Article Award “Structural Cohesion and Embeddedness: A Hierarchical Concept of Social Groups” American Damon Centola. “The Spread of Behavior in an Online Sociological Review, February 2003, 63: 103-27. Social Network Experiment” Science, 2010, 329: 1194-1197. 2003 Outstanding Publication Award 2010 Laszlo Polos, Michael Hannan, “Reasoning with 2002 Partial Knowledge” Sociological Methodology, Vol. Harrison White, Columbia University 32, (2002), pp. 133-181. ____________________________________________ 2002 Outstanding Graduate Student Paper Award Outstanding Article Award Given every year Andrew Noymer, University of California, Berkeley, 2014 “The transmission and persistence of ‘urban legends’: Alexander Hanna, University of Wisconsin, sociological application of age-structured epidemic “Computer-Aided Content Analysis of Digitally models.” Journal of Mathematical Sociology, 25(3): Enabled Movements,” Mobilization: An International 299-323. Quarterly, 2013. 18: 367-388. 2001 2013 Outstanding Publication Award Charles Seguin, University of North Carolina, Philip Bonacich “A Behavioral Foundation for a "Cultural Superstardom from Multiple Mechanisms: Structural Theory of Power in Exchange Networks” Two Mathematical Models of Cultural Object Social Psychology Quarterly, Vol. 61, No. 3 (Sep., Popularity." 1998), pp. 185-198. 2012 2000 David Melamed and Scott Savage, University of Outstanding Publication Award Arizona, "Predicting Social Influence: A Model at the Duncan Watts “Networks, Dynamics, and the Small- Intersection of Sociology and Psychology" World Phenomenon” The American Journal of Sociology, Vol. 105, No. 2 2011 (Sep., 1999), pp. 493-527. Ashton Verdery, University of North Carolina-Chapel Hill, "Population Growth and Social Structure" 1999 Outstanding Publication Award 2010 Noah E. Friedkin A Structural Theory of Social David Melamed, University of Arizona, "Quantifying Influence Justice Evaluations with Graded Status Cambridge, New York: Cambridge University Characteristics" Press, 1998. (Honorable Mention) Daniel Shank, University of __________________________________________ Georgia, “Affect toward Coercive Computers: James S. Coleman Distinguished Career Award Contrasting Affect Control with Social Exchange” Career Achievement Award - begun in 2002, given every other year. 2009 2014 Neha Gondal, Rutgers University, "Knowledge Space Phillip Bonacich, UCLA as a Partially Self-Organizing System" 2012 2008 John Skvoretz, University of South Florida Michael Genkin and Alexander Gutfraind, Cornell University “How Do Terrorist Cells Assemble? Insights from an agent-Based Model” 2010 David Heise, Indiana University 2007 Yen-Sheng Chiang 2008 “Birds of Moderately Different Feathers: Bandwagon Scott Boorman, Yale University Dynamics and the Threshold of Network Neighbors. Journal of Mathematical Sociology” 2007, 31:1-23. 2006 Linton Freeman, University of California, Irvine 2006 Steven Bernard & Robb Willer, Cornell University “A 2004 Wealth and Status-Based Model of Residential Thomas Fararo, University of Pittsburgh Segregation”. Journal of Mathematical Sociology, 2007, 31(2):149-174. Pamela Emanuelson, University of South Carolina, “Extension and Refinement of Network Exchange 2003 Theory” Fabio Rojas, Kirby Schroeder, University of Chicago 2007 2002 Rense Corten Utrecht University, Netherlands Andrew Noymer, University of California, Berkeley, “Coevolution of Social Networks and Behavior in “The Transformation and Persistence Application of Social Dilemmas Age-Structured Epidemics” 2001 Vincent Buskens, Utrecht University, “A Stochastic Model for Information Diffusion in Social Networks” 1999 Carter E. Butts, Carnegie-Mellon University “A Bayesian Model of Panic in Belief” Outstanding Dissertation in Progress Award Begun in 2007, given every year 2016 Yongren Shi, Cornell University. “Study of Political and Cultural Polarization Using Book Co-purchases and Reviews.” 2014 Jesse Clark, University of Georgia. “How Cohesion Motivation in Task Groups Affects Status and Influence.”s 2013 Akshay Patil, Stony Brook University. “Analyzing Dynamics in Online Social Networks.” 2012 Zack Almquist, University of Califonia- Irvine. “Vertex Processes in Social Networks.” 2011 Nick Bergian, University of South Carolina, “Justice, Sanctioning and Retaliation in the Provision of Public Goods.” 2010 David Melamed, University of Arizona Jeffrey Smith, Duke University 2009 Tucker S. McGrimmon, University of South Carolina, "Social Diversity and the Efficacy of Majority Rule Voting" 2008 .
Recommended publications
  • Basics of Social Network Analysis Distribute Or

    Basics of Social Network Analysis Distribute Or

    1 Basics of Social Network Analysis distribute or post, copy, not Do Copyright ©2017 by SAGE Publications, Inc. This work may not be reproduced or distributed in any form or by any means without express written permission of the publisher. Chapter 1 Basics of Social Network Analysis 3 Learning Objectives zz Describe basic concepts in social network analysis (SNA) such as nodes, actors, and ties or relations zz Identify different types of social networks, such as directed or undirected, binary or valued, and bipartite or one-mode zz Assess research designs in social network research, and distinguish sampling units, relational forms and contents, and levels of analysis zz Identify network actors at different levels of analysis (e.g., individuals or aggregate units) when reading social network literature zz Describe bipartite networks, know when to use them, and what their advan- tages are zz Explain the three theoretical assumptions that undergird social networkdistribute studies zz Discuss problems of causality in social network analysis, and suggest methods to establish causality in network studies or 1.1 Introduction The term “social network” entered everyday language with the advent of the Internet. As a result, most people will connect the term with the Internet and social media platforms, but it has in fact a much broaderpost, application, as we will see shortly. Still, pictures like Figure 1.1 are what most people will think of when they hear the word “social network”: thousands of points connected to each other. In this particular case, the points represent political blogs in the United States (grey ones are Republican, and dark grey ones are Democrat), the ties indicating hyperlinks between them.
  • THE NETWORK CITY Paul Craven Barry Wellman Research Paper No. 59 Centre for Urban and Community Studies Department of Sociology

    THE NETWORK CITY Paul Craven Barry Wellman Research Paper No. 59 Centre for Urban and Community Studies Department of Sociology

    THE NETWORK CITY Paul Craven Barry Wellman Research Paper No. 59 Centre for Urban and Community Studies and Department of Sociology University of Toronto July, 1973 To appear in a special issue on "The Community" of Sociological Inquiry. ABSTRACT The network approach to urban studies can be differentiated from other approaches by its insistence on the primacy of structures of interpersonal linkages, rather than the classification of social units according to their individual characteristics. Network analysis is an approach, leading to the formulation of particular kinds of questions, such as "who is linked to whom?" and "what is the structure and content of their relational network;" at the same time it is a methodology for their investigation. Following a discussion of network analytic methods, several of the key issues in urban studies are investigated from this perspective. Interpersonal ties in the city, migration, resource allocation, neighbor­ hood and connnunity are examined in terms of the network structures and processes that order and integrat~ urban activities. These structures and processes reveal U1emselves to be ever more complex and extensive at each level of the investigation. A view of the city itself as a network of networks is proposed. It is the organization of urban life by networks that makes the scale and diversity of the city a source of strength rather than chaos, while it is precisely that scale and diversity which maKes the complex and widely-ramified network structures possible. The flexibility inherent in network structures can accommodate a variety of situations, while variations in the content and intensity of network linkages allows for the co-ordination and integration of widely different people and activities.
  • Columbia University Center Fororal History

    Columbia University Center Fororal History

    Columbia University Center for Oral History TEN-YEAR REPORT “The great strength of oral history is its ability to record memories in a way that honors the dignity and integrity of ordinary people.” —Mary Marshall Clark, Director, Columbia Center for Oral History Letter from the Director .............................. 1 CCOH Mission and History ............................ 3 Research ........................................ 5 September 11, 2001, Oral History Projects . 5 After the Fall, CCOH Director Book . 7 Apollo Theater Oral History Project . 7 Guantánamo Bay Oral History Project Video Interviews in London, England . 8 Atlantic Philanthropies Oral History Project . 8 Council on Foreign Relations Oral History Project . 9 Elizabeth Murray Oral History of Women in the Visual Arts . 9 Guantánamo Bay Oral History Project . 9 Rule of Law Oral History Project . 10 United Nations Intellectual History Project . 10 Biographical Interviews . 10 John W. Kluge (1914–2010) . 10 William T. Golden (1909–2007) . 11 Robert P. DeVecchi . 11 Archive ......................................... 13 Oral History Collections Portal . 13 CCOH’s New Website . 13 Digital Exhibitions . 14 Preservation . 15 Education ........................................ 17 Oral History Master of Arts . 17 Summer Institute . 17 Workshops and Events . 19 Conference Presentations . 21 Consultations . 21 Oral History Training for Educators and Human Rights Activists . 22 Online Outreach . 22 Publications ...................................... 23 Staff, Supporters, and Advisory Board .................... 25 Staff and Interviewers . 25 Advisory Committee . 26 Supporters . 27 Contact Us ............................ inside back cover 1 Letter from the Director Ten years ago, in June 2001, I was named director of the Oral History Research Office . Having worked for some years at Columbia, I knew my way around and looked forward to some time to plan the future .
  • Damon M. Centola

    Damon M. Centola

    12 March 2021 Damon M. Centola Annenberg School for Communication Ph/Office: 215-898-7041 University of Pennsylvania Fax/Office: 215-898-2024 3620 Walnut Street Email: [email protected] Philadelphia, PA 19104 Website: https://ndg.asc.upenn.edu/ Education Ph.D. Sociology, Cornell University, 2006 MA Sociology, Cornell University, 2004 BA Philosophy/Logic, Marlboro College, 1997, summa cum laude Appointments 2019- Professor of Communication, Annenberg School for Communication Professor of Engineering (secondary), School of Engineering and Applied Sciences Professor of Sociology (secondary), School of Arts and Sciences University of Pennsylvania 2019- Senior Fellow, Penn LDI Center for Health Incentives and Behavioral Economics 2019- Faculty, Penn Population Studies Center 2015- Faculty, Penn Master of Behavioral and Decision Sciences Program 2013- Faculty, Penn Warren Center for Network and Data Sciences 2013- Director, Network Dynamics Group 2013-19 Associate Professor, Annenberg School for Communication & School of Engineering and Applied Sciences, University of Pennsylvania 2008-13 Assistant Professor, MIT Sloan School of Management 2006-08 Robert Wood Johnson Scholar in Health Policy, Harvard University 2001-02 Visiting Scholar, The Brookings Institution Research Computational Social Science, Social Epidemiology, Social Networks, Internet Experiments, Collective Action and Social Movements, Innovation Diffusion, Sustainability Policy, Cultural Evolution, Agent Based Modeling Awards and Fellowships 2019 Harrison White Outstanding
  • Book Review: Harrison White Identity and Control. How Social

    Book Review: Harrison White Identity and Control. How Social

    ACTA SOCIOLOGICA 2010 Book Reviews Harrison White Identity and Control. How Social Formations Emerge Princeton: Princeton University Press, 2nd edn., 2008, 472 pp. ith publication of the first edition of Identity and Control in 1992, Harrison White secured Wa position among contemporary social theorists. Although second editions are not usually reviewed, White’s book calls for a review for two reasons. The first is the changes he has made, and the second is the status of the author of the book. People in fields such as network theory, economic sociology and mathematical sociology have used White’s ideas, but his work has a much broader relevance and it is shown in this new edition. It is no surprise that White is gaining respect in Europe. Though one should hesitate to generalize, sociological theory is still a largely European affair. White can be seen as the father of modern network theory, but in contrast to most of his old network peers, not only does he see network theory as a method, he addresses the phenomenology of networks, how they are constituted and, more generally, the emergence of social formations that we have to grasp if we are to make sense of any network. At least in practice, White is also the father of what has been called ‘relational sociology’. What are these social formations? The first line of the argument is that identities, which are the active poles in the Whitean system, are formed by attempts to control. However, identi- ties can only be stable if they are recognized by others.
  • Curriculum Vitae Et Studiorum

    Curriculum Vitae Et Studiorum

    ARNOUT VAN DE RIJT 11/14/18 Full Professor Department of Sociology Utrecht University Utrecht, the Netherlands office: +31 30 253 2880 cell: +31 6 8011 6134 ACADEMIC POSITIONS Chair in Sociology, European University Institute. 2019- Full Professor & Designated Chair. Department of Sociology & Institutions for Open Societies. Utrecht University. 2016- Associate Professor (Tenured). Department of Sociology and Institute for Advanced Computational Science (joint). SUNY Stony Brook. 2013-2017 Assistant Professor (Tenure-track). Department of Sociology. SUNY Stony Brook. 2007–2012 EDUCATION Ph.D. Cornell University Sociology, 2007. Committee: Michael Macy (advisor), Douglas Heckathorn, Victor Nee, Vincent Buskens M.Sc. Utrecht University Sociology, 2002 B.A. Utrecht School of the Arts Music, 1998 RESEARCH AND TEACHING INTERESTS Social Networks, Collective Action, Cumulative Advantage, Mathematical Sociology, Computational and Experimental Methods ARTICLES IN PEER-REVIEWED JOURNALS Arnout van de Rijt. 2019. “Self-Correcting Dynamics in Social Influence Processes.” Forthcoming in American Journal of Sociology 124(4). Arnout van de Rijt, Hyanggi Song, Eran Shor, and Rebekah Burroway. 2018. “Racial and Gender Differences in Missing Children’s Recovery Chances.” Forthcoming in PLoS ONE. Floor van Maaren and Arnout van de Rijt. 2018. “No Integration Paradox among Adolescents.” Forthcoming in Journal of Ethnic and Migration Studies. Eran Shor, Arnout van de Rijt, and Alex Miltsov. 2018. “Do Women in the Newsroom Make a Difference? Coverage Sentiment toward Women and Men as a Function of Newsroom Composition.” Forthcoming in Sex Roles. Jart Ligterink, Jim Kleijwegt and Arnout van de Rijt. 2018. “Mobilizability of Social Housing Residents for the Energy Transition.” Forthcoming in Mens & Maatschappij. Thijs Bol, Mathijs de Vaan and Arnout van de Rijt.
  • A Network Approach to Political Discourse Dynamics, Hungary 1997

    A Network Approach to Political Discourse Dynamics, Hungary 1997

    INSTITUTE FOR SOCIAL AND ECONOMIC RESEARCH AND POLICY COLUMBIA UNIVERSITY WORKING PAPERS NEGOTIATING THE END OF TRANSITION: A NETWORK APPROACH TO POLITICAL DISCOURSE DYNAMICS, HUNGARY 1997 Balázs Vedres Columbia University Péter Csigó Ecole des Hautes Etudes en Sciences Sociales December 2002 ISERP WORKING PAPER 02-06 Institute for Social and Economic Research and Policy This paper was prepared for the course “Social Network Analysis” of Duncan Watts. We are thankful for the comments of Peter Bearman, David Stark, Harrison White, John Krinsky and the participants of the “Economic Sociology” seminar of Harrison White and the CODES workshop of David Stark. We are also thankful for the travel grant of the Institute for Social and Economic Research and Policy and the Center on Organizational Innovation. Abstract The initial question of this paper is how the large scale social process of postsocialist transition ends. We argue that transition is closed by discursive innovations in the political field, rather than just spontaneous crystallization. The political field is depicted as a dynamic symbolic structure that is an arena of local action. First the possible discourse positions are extracted from the two mode network of speech acts and statements. Then using these typical positions the dynamics of responses and responses to responses is explored. We give an account of an emergent univocal government position that represents a successful role claim (an exit from the loops of local action) on the government’s side to coherently frame the end of transition. INTRODUCTION There is a bias in dynamic sociology towards focusing on the start of major social processes rather than their end.
  • MARISSA KING Yale School of Management 165 Whitney Avenue New Haven, CT 06511 Marissa.King@Yale.Edu | Phone: (646) 573-3290

    MARISSA KING Yale School of Management 165 Whitney Avenue New Haven, CT 06511 [email protected] | Phone: (646) 573-3290

    MARISSA KING Yale School of Management 165 Whitney Avenue New Haven, CT 06511 [email protected] | Phone: (646) 573-3290 EMPLOYMENT YALE UNIVERSITY 2015-Present Associate Professor, Yale School of Management Associate Professor, Department of Sociology (by courtesy) Associate Professor, Health Policy and Management (by courtesy) 2010-2015 Assistant Professor, Yale School of Management COLUMBIA UNIVERSITY 2008-2010 Post-Doctoral Research Scholar, Paul F. Lazarsfeld Center for the Social Sciences, Columbia University EDUCATION 2008 Ph.D. in Sociology, Columbia University 2002 B.A. in Sociology, Reed College RESEARCH ARTICLES 2015 Olfson, Mark, Marissa King, and Michael Schoenbaum. “Treatment of Young People with Antipsychotic Medications in the United States.” JAMA Psychiatry 72: 867-874 2015 Olfson, Mark, Marissa King, and Michael Schoenbaum. “Antipsychotic Treatment of Adults in the United States.” The Journal of Clinical Psychiatry 76:1346-1353 2015 Butala, Neel, Marissa King, William Reitsman, Richard Formica, Peter Reese, Peter Apt, and Chirag Parikh. “The Effect of Organ Procurement Organization Social Network Centrality on Kidney Discard and Transplant.” Transplantation 99:2617-2624. 2014 King, Marissa, Jennifer Jennings, and Jason Fletcher. “Medical Adaption to Academic Pressure: Schooling, Stimulant Use, and Socioeconomic Status.” American Sociological Review. 79:1039-1066. * James Coleman Outstanding Article Award from the Sociology of Education Section of the American Sociological Association 2014 Olfson, Mark, Marissa King, and Michael Schoenbaum. “Benzodiazepine Use in the United States.” JAMA Psychiatry 72:132- 46. 2013 King, Marissa, Connor Essick, Peter Bearman and Joseph Ross. “Medical School Gift Restriction Policies and Physician Prescribing of Newly Marketed Psychotropic Medications: A Difference-in- Differences Analysis.” British Medical Journal 346: 10.1136/bmj.f264 2013 King, Marissa and Connor Essick.
  • Chains of Affection: the Structure of Adolescent Romantic and Sexual Networks1

    Chains of Affection: the Structure of Adolescent Romantic and Sexual Networks1

    Chains of Affection: The Structure of Adolescent Romantic and Sexual Networks1 Peter S. Bearman Columbia University James Moody Ohio State University Katherine Stovel University of Washington This article describes the structure of the adolescent romantic and sexual network in a population of over 800 adolescents residing in a midsized town in the midwestern United States. Precise images and measures of network structure are derived from reports of re- lationships that occurred over a period of 18 months between 1993 and 1995. The study offers a comparison of the structural charac- teristics of the observed network to simulated networks conditioned on the distribution of ties; the observed structure reveals networks characterized by longer contact chains and fewer cycles than ex- pected. This article identifies the micromechanisms that generate networks with structural features similar to the observed network. Implications for disease transmission dynamics and social policy are explored. INTRODUCTION This article describes the structure of adolescent romantic and sexual networks in an American high school, accounts for the emergence of this 1 Data for this article are drawn from the National Longitudinal Study of Adolescent Health (Add Health), a program project designed by J. Richard Udry and Peter Bear- man, and funded by a grant from the National Institute of Child Health and Human Development (HD31921). The authors thank Douglas White, Martina Morris, Mark Handcock, J. Richard Udry, and the AJS reviewers for helpful comments on previous drafts of this article. Direct correspondence to Peter Bearman, Institute for Social and Economic Research and Policy, 814 SIPA Building, Columbia University, New York, New York 10027.
  • Comparable Metaphors of Social Space? Bourdieu's Field and the American Sociology's Network C

    Comparable Metaphors of Social Space? Bourdieu's Field and the American Sociology's Network C

    Fields and Social Networks: Comparable Metaphors of Social Space? Autoria: Charles Kirschbaum Bourdieu’s Field and the American Sociology’s Network concepts have been considered incompatible from an ontological and epistemological point of view. While the former stresses the one’s position in a social space based on volumes and types of capital and exercise of symbolic power, the latter assumes an individualistic approach, taking the number of controlled ties as a proxy of capital, and power dimension would be underscored. Harrison White is among the sociologists who harshly criticize the latter approach, for its emphasis on individuals. White recovers the idea of ‘social space’, deemphasizing the hegemonic methodological individualism in social network analysis. This article seeks to compare Bourdieu’s and Harrison White’s theories, showing the elements that are irreducible to each other, as well as some common intuitions. Rather than offering a synthesis of these theories, I propose that they are complementary in understanding the dynamics of a social space. Bourdieu’s capital-based Field construct leads us closer to explain one’s interests in connection to her actions. White’s focus on ambiguous action within social networks is relevant to understand how actors uncouple recurrent patterns of social reproduction. Finally, I recover empirical examples where it is possible to combine both approaches. Introduction: beyond Functionalism One of the most popular streams of research in the revival of Economic Sociology explores the social conditions where economic transactions take place (GUILLEN et al, 2002; SWEDBERG, 2004). In general, such approach has rejected the radical methodological individualism initially proposed by economics, and lately introduced in the sociology (see for instance, COLEMAN, 1990).
  • Damon M. Centola

    Damon M. Centola

    11 August 2020 Damon M. Centola Annenberg School for Communication Ph/Office: 215-898-7041 University of Pennsylvania Fax/Office: 215-898-2024 3620 Walnut Street Email: [email protected] Philadelphia, PA 19104 Research Website: https://ndg.asc.upenn.edu/ Education Ph.D. Sociology, Cornell University, 2006 MA Sociology, Cornell University, 2004 BA Philosophy/Logic, Marlboro College, 1997, summa cum laude Appointments 2019- Professor of Communication, Annenberg School for Communication Professor of Engineering (secondary), School of Engineering and Applied Sciences Professor of Sociology (secondary), School of Arts and Sciences University of Pennsylvania 2019- Senior Fellow, Penn LDI Center for Health Incentives and Behavioral Economics 2019- Faculty, Penn Population Studies Center 2015- Faculty, Penn Master of Behavioral and Decision Sciences Program 2013- Faculty, Penn Warren Center for Network and Data Sciences 2013- Director, Network Dynamics Group 2013-19 Associate Professor, Annenberg School for Communication & School of Engineering and Applied Sciences, University of Pennsylvania 2008-13 Assistant Professor, M.I.T., Sloan School of Management 2006-08 Robert Wood Johnson Scholar in Health Policy, Harvard University 2001-02 Visiting Scholar, The Brookings Institution Research Computational Social Science, Social Epidemiology, Social Networks, Internet Experiments, Collective Action and Social Movements, Innovation Diffusion, Sustainability Policy, Cultural Evolution, Agent Based Modeling Awards and Fellowships 2019 Harrison White
  • David R. Gibson Curriculum Vitae

    David R. Gibson Curriculum Vitae

    Updated 1/6/2021 David R. Gibson Curriculum Vitae Sociology Department E-mail: [email protected] University of Notre Dame 4052 Jenkins Nanovic Halls Personal web page: Notre Dame, IN 46556 https://sites.google.com/site/davidrichardgibson/ Education 1999: Ph.D. (Sociology, with Distinction), Columbia University 1995: M.Phil. (Sociology) Columbia University 1994: M.A. (Sociology) Columbia University 1991: B.A., Eastern College (magna cum laude) Positions 2013-present: Associate Professor, University of Notre Dame, Department of Sociology Faculty Fellow, Kroc Institute for International Peace Studies 2012-2013: Lecturer, Princeton University, Department of Sociology 2005-2012: Assistant Professor, University of Pennsylvania, Department of Sociology 2001-2005: Assistant Professor, Harvard University, Department of Sociology 1999-2001: Post-doctoral Fellow, Institute for Social and Economic Research and Policy, Columbia University Areas of interest Social interaction, decision making, social networks, computational modeling, theory, organizations, secrecy & deception, science, morality. Book Gibson, David. 2012. Talk at the Brink: Deliberation and Decision During the Cuban Missile Crisis. Princeton University Press. Recipient of 2013 Melvin Pollner Prize, Ethnomethodology and Conversation Analysis section of the American Sociological Association. 1-DG Peer-reviewed articles Gibson, David R. and Matthew P. Fox. Forthcoming. “Facts into Faults: The Grammar of Guilt in Jury Deliberations.” Discourse Studies. Gibson, David R. Forthcoming. “Repetition Acknowledgement Prefaces.” Symbolic Interaction. Gibson, David R. 2016. “Ignorance at Risk: Interaction at the Epistemic Boundary of Bernard Madoff’s Ponzi Scheme.” Qualitative Sociology 39(3):221-46 (lead article). Gibson, David R. 2016. “The Habits of Normal, Innocent People (NIPs), as Construed by the North American Juror.” Symbolic Interaction 39(3): 397-420.