Steiner

Algorithms and Networks 2014/2015 Hans L. Bodlaender Johan M. M. van Rooij

1 The Steiner Tree Problem

 Let G = (V,E) be an undirected graph, and let N µ V be a subset of the terminals.  A Steiner tree is a tree T = (V’,E’) in G connecting all terminals in N  V’ µ V, E’ µ E, N µ V’  We use k=|N|.

 Streiner tree problem:  Given: an undirected graph G = (V,E), a terminal set N µ V, and an integer t.  Question: is there a Steiner tree consisting of at most t edges in G.

2 My Last Lecture

 Steiner Tree.  Interesting problem that we have not seen yet.

 Introduction  Variants / applications  NP-Completeness  Polynomial time solvable special cases.  Distance network.  Solving Steiner tree with k-terminals in O*(2k)-time.  Uses inclusion/exclusion.  Algorithm invented by one of our former students.

3 Steiner Tree – Algorithms and Networks INTRODUCTION

4 Variants and Applications

 Applications:  Wire routing of VLSI.  Customer’s bill for renting communication networks.  Other network design and facility location problems.

 Some variants:  Vertices are points in the plane.  Vertex weights / edge weights vs unit weights.  Different variants for directed graphs.

5 Steiner Tree is NP-Complete

 Steiner Tree is NP-Complete.  Membership of NP: certificate is a subset of the edges.  NP-Hard: reduction from Vertex Cover.  Take an instance of Vertex Cover, G=(V,E), integer k.  Build G’=(V’,E’) by subdividing each edge.  Set N = set of newly introduced vertices.  All edges length 1.  Add one superterminal connected to all vertices.  G’ has Steiner Tree with |E|+k edges, if and only if, G has vertex cover with k vertices. = terminal

6 Steiner Tree – Algorithms and Networks POLYNOMIAL-TIME SOLVABLE SPECIAL CASES

7 Special Cases of Steiner Tree

 k = 1: trivial.  k = 2: shortest path.  k = n: .

 k = c = O(1): constant number of terminals, polynomial- time solvable (next slides).

8 Distance Networks

 Distance network D(X) of G=(V,E) (induced by the set X).  Take with vertex set X.  Cost of edge {v,w} in distance network is length shortest path from v to w in G.

Observations:  Let W be the set of vertices of larger than two for an optimal Steiner tree T in G with terminal set N.  The Steiner tree T consists of a series of shortest paths between vertices in N [ W.  The cost of T equals the cost of the minimum spanning tree in D(N[W).  The cost of the optimal Steiner tree in D(V) equals the cost of T.

9 Steiner Tree with O(1) Terminals

 Suppose |N|= k is constant c.  Compute distance network D(V).  There is a minimum cost Steiner tree in D(V) that contains at most k – 2 non-terminals.  Any Steiner tree that has one that is no longer without non- terminal vertices of degree 1 and 2.  A tree with r leaves and internal vertices of degree at least 3 has at most r – 2 internal vertices.

 Polynomial time algorithm for k = O(1) terminals:  Enumerate all sets W of at most k – 2 non-terminals in G.  For each W, find a minimum spanning tree in the distance network D(NW).  Take the best over all these solutions  Takes polynomial time for fixed k = O(1).

10 Steiner Tree – Algorithms and Networks O*(2K) ALGORITHM BY INCLUSION/EXCLUSION

11 Some background on the algorithm

 Algorithm invented by Jesper Nederlof.  Just after he finished his Master thesis supervised by Hans (and a little bit by me).  Master thesis on Inclusion/Exclusion algorithms.

12 A Recap: Inclusion/Exclusion Formula

 General form of the Inclusion/Exclusion formula:

 Let N be a collection of objects (anything).  Let 1,2, ...,n be a series of requirements on objects.  Finally, let for a subset W µ {1,2,...,n}, N(W) be the number of objects in N that do not satisfy the requirements in W.

 Then, the number of objects X that satisfy all requirements is: |W| X  (1) N(W)  W {1,2,...,n}

13 The Inclusion/Exclusion formula: Alternative proofs

|W| X  (1) N(W) W {1,2,...,n}

 Various ways to prove the formula. 1. See the formula as a branching algorithm branching on a requirement: required = optional – forbidden

2. If an object satisfies all requirements, it is counted in N(). If an object does not satisfy all requirements, say all but those in a set W’, then it is counted in all W µ W’  With a +1 if W is even, and a -1 if W is odd.  W’ has equally many even as odd subsets: total contribution is 0.

14 Using the Inclusion/Exclusion Formula for Steiner Tree (problematic version)

|W|  One possible approach: X  (1) N(W)  Objects: trees in the graph G. W {1,2,...,n}  Requirements: contain every terminal.  Then we need to compute 2k times the number of trees in a subgraph of G.  For each W µ N, compute trees in G[V\W].

 However, counting trees is difficult:  Hard to keep track of which vertices are already in the tree.  Compare to Hamiltonian Cycle:  We want something that looks like a walk, so that we do not need to remember where we have been.

15 Branching Walks

 Definition: Branching walk in G=(V,E) is a tuple (T,Á):  Ordered tree T.  Mapping Á from nodes of T to nodes of G, s.t. for any edge {u,v} in the tree T we have that {Á(u),Á(v)} 2 E.

 The length of a branching walk is the number of edges in T.  When r is the root of T, we say that the branching walk starts in Á(r) 2 V.  For any n 2 T, we say that the branching walk visits all vertices Á(n) 2 V.

 Some examples on the blackboard...

16 Branching Walks and Steiner Tree

 Definition: Branching walk in G=(V,E) is a tuple (T,Á):  Ordered tree T.  Mapping Á from nodes of T to nodes of G, s.t. for any edge {u,v} in the tree T we have that {Á(u),Á(v)} 2 E.

 Lemma: Let s 2 N a terminal. There exists a Steiner tree T in G with at most c edges, if and only if, there exists a branching walk of length at most c starting in s visiting all terminals N.

17 Using the Inclusion/Exclusion Formula for Steiner Tree

|W|  Approach: X  (1) N(W)  Objects: branching walks from W {1,2,...,n} some s 2 N of length c in the graph G.  Requirements: contain every terminal in N\{s}.  We need to compute 2k-1 times the number of branching walks of length c in a subgraph of G.  For each W µ N\{s}, compute branching walks from s in G[V\W].

 Next: how do we count branching walks?  Dynamic programming (similar to ordinary walks).

18 Counting Branching Walks

 Let BW(v,j) be the number of branching walks of length j starting in v in G[W].

 BW(v,0) = 1 for any vertex v.  B (v,j) =   B (u,j ) B (v,j ) W u2(N(v)ÅW) j1 + j2 = j-1 W 1 W 2  j2 = 0 covers the case where we do not branch / split up and walk to vertex u.

 Otherwise, a subtree of size j1 is created from neighbour u, while a new tree of size j2 is added starting in v. This splits off one branch, and can be repeated to split of more branches.

 We can compute BW(v,j) for j = 0,1,2,....,t.  All in polynomial time.

19 Putting It All Together

|W| Algorithm: X  (1) N(W)  Choose any s 2 N. W {1,2,...,n}  For t = 1, 2, …  Use the inclusion/exclusion formula to count the number of branching walks from s of length t visiting all terminals N.  This results in 2k-1 times counting branching walks from s of length c in G[V\W].  If this number is non-zero: stop the algorithm and output that the smallest Steiner tree has size t.

20 Steiner Tree – Algorithms and Networks THAT’S ALL FOLKS…

21