DOCSLIB.ORG

Modeling and Simulation of a Hybrid Electric Vehicle for the Challenge X Competition

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Modeling and Simulation of a Hybrid Electric Vehicle for the Challenge X Competition Modeling and Simulation of a Hybrid Electric Vehicle for the Challenge X Competition Submitted to: The Engineering Honors Committee 119 Hitchcock Hall College of Engineering The Ohio State University Columbus, OH 43210 By Michael Arnett 4091 Millsboro Rd W Mansfield, OH 44903 Dr. Giorgio Rizzoni, Advisor May 20, 2005 Abstract: As the market shifts toward larger vehicles and growing concerns regarding petroleum consumption and emissions emerge, automakers have begun to explore new vehicle propulsion solutions. General Motors and The Department of Energy have joined together to create the Challenge X competition to explore hybrid-electric vehicles as one such solution. Seventeen teams across the United State will experience “real-world” HEV development over the three year competition. This process begins with vehicle architecture selection, modeling and simulation. A dynamic model of a hybrid-electric powertrain is developed here. This model is then implemented into two Simulink based simulators: the quasi-static cX-SIM, the dynamic cX-DYN. These simulators are used to validate the control strategy being developed for the Challenge X vehicle. Verification will include optimal performance in regards to fuel consumption, battery state-of-charge, and drivability. Techniques of validating the model and simulators using a rolling chassis are also being implemented. Preliminary data from the quasi-static simulator and the rolling chassis is presented herein. Acknowledgements: I would like to thank Dr. Giorgio Rizzoni, Joe Morbitzer, Osvaldo Barbarisi, Kerem Koprubasi, Jason Disalvo, John Neal and Christopher C. Mabry, for all of the help and support they have given me throughout the duration of this research. ii Table Contents CHAPTER 1: INTRODUCTION ............................................................................................................... 6 1.1 MOTIVATION ....................................................................................................................................... 6 1.2 VEHICLE ARCHITECTURE................................................................................................................... 8 1.2.1 Classifications of HEVs .............................................................................................................. 8 1.2.2 Vehicle Components.................................................................................................................. 10 1.2.3 Modes of Operation................................................................................................................... 11 CHAPTER 2: MODELING....................................................................................................................... 14 2.1 MODEL OF THE DRIVELINE .............................................................................................................. 14 2.1.1 Dynamic Equations of the Front Driveline.............................................................................. 15 2.1.2 Dynamic Equations of Rear Driveline ..................................................................................... 17 2.1.3 Dynamic Equation of the Vehicle............................................................................................. 17 2.2 DYNAMIC SIMULINK MODEL OF THE FRONT DRIVELINE ................................................................ 18 2.2.1 ICE Model ................................................................................................................................. 19 2.2.2 Clutch Model............................................................................................................................. 19 2.2.3 Front Gearbox Model ............................................................................................................... 20 2.2.4 Transmission ............................................................................................................................. 21 2.2.5 Front Axle ................................................................................................................................. 22 2.2.6 Front Brakes ............................................................................................................................. 23 2.2.7 Front Wheels............................................................................................................................. 24 2.3 DYNAMIC SIMULINK MODEL OF THE REAR DRIVELINE .................................................................. 25 2.3.1 Electric Motor ........................................................................................................................... 25 2.3.2 Rear Gearbox ............................................................................................................................ 26 2.3.3 Rear Axle................................................................................................................................... 27 2.3.4 Rear Brakes............................................................................................................................... 28 2.3.5 Rear Wheels............................................................................................................................... 29 CHAPTER 3: SIMULATION RESULTS................................................................................................ 31 3.1 CX-SIM ............................................................................................................................................. 31 3.1.1 Driver......................................................................................................................................... 32 3.1.2 HEV Powertrain........................................................................................................................ 33 3.1.3 Vehicle....................................................................................................................................... 34 3.2 CX-DYN ............................................................................................................................................ 34 3.3 CX GRAPHICS .................................................................................................................................... 36 3.3.1 Set Layout for Plots Driver ....................................................................................................... 37 3.3.2 Set Layout for Plots Vehicle...................................................................................................... 38 3.3.3 Set Layouts for Plots Acceleration Test.................................................................................... 39 3.3.4 Set Layout for Plots HEV Operation........................................................................................ 40 3.3.5 Set Layout Plots for Conventional Operation .......................................................................... 41 3.3.6 Set Layout Plots for Electric Powertrain.................................................................................. 42 CHAPTER 4: RESULTS & MODEL VERIFICATION........................................................................ 45 4.1 CX-SIM ............................................................................................................................................. 45 4.2 CX-DYN ............................................................................................................................................ 52 4.3 ROLLING CHASSIS............................................................................................................................. 52 4.3.1 Launch Test............................................................................................................................... 53 4.3.2 Model Verification & Mapping................................................................................................. 57 4.3.3 cX Test ....................................................................................................................................... 60 CHAPTER 5: CONTROL STRATEGY DEVELOPMENT .................................................................. 62 5.1 OVERVIEW......................................................................................................................................... 62 5.2 ECMS................................................................................................................................................ 63 5.3 BATTERY STATE-OF-CHARGE .......................................................................................................... 64 iii 5.4 DRIVABILITY ..................................................................................................................................... 65 REFERENCES ........................................................................................................................................... 67 APPENDIX ................................................................................................................................................. 68 List of Figures: Figure 1. Ohio State Challenge X Vehicle Architecture [5]............................................. 10 Figure 2. Dynamic Model of the Driveline [8]................................................................. 15 Figure 3. Simulink Diagram of ICE & ISA....................................................................... 19 Figure 4. Simulink Diagram of the Clutch. ......................................................................
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Steady State and Transient Efficiencies of A
    STEADY STATE AND TRANSIENT EFFICIENCIES OF A FOUR CYLINDER DIRECT INJECTION DIESEL ENGINE FOR IMPLEMENTATION IN A HYBRID ELECTRIC VEHICLE A Thesis Presented to The Graduate Faculty of The University of Akron In Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree Masters of Science Charles Van Horn August, 2006 STEADY STATE AND TRANSIENT EFFICIENCIES OF A FOUR CYLINDER DIRECT INJECTION DIESEL ENGINE FOR IMPLEMENTATION IN A HYBRID ELECTRIC VEHICLE Charles Van Horn Thesis Approved: Accepted: Advisor Department Chair Dr. Scott Sawyer Dr. Celal Batur Faculty Reader Dean of the College Dr. Richard Gross Dr. George K. Haritos Faculty Reader Dean of the Graduate School Dr. Iqbal Husain Dr. George R. Newkome Date ii ABSTRACT The efficiencies of a four cylinder direct injection diesel engine have been investigated for the implementation in a hybrid electric vehicle (HEV). The engine was cycled through various operating points depending on the power and torque requirements for the HEV. The selected engine for the HEV is a 2005 Volkswagen 1.9L diesel engine. The 2005 Volkswagen 1.9L diesel engine was tested to develop the steady-state engine efficiencies and to evaluate the transient effects on these efficiencies. The peak torque and power curves were developed using a water brake dynamometer. Once these curves were obtained steady-state testing at various engine speeds and powers was conducted to determine engine efficiencies. Transient operation of the engine was also explored using partial throttle and variable throttle testing. The transient efficiency was compared to the steady-state efficiencies and showed a decrease from the steady- state values.
    [Show full text]
  • Using the Ecocar Challenge As a Non-Traditional Domain for Software and Computer Engineering Capstone Course
    AC 2011-1099: USING THE ECOCAR CHALLENGE AS A NON-TRADITIONAL DOMAIN FOR SOFTWARE AND COMPUTER ENGINEERING CAPSTONE COURSE Richard Stansbury, Embry-Riddle Aeronautical Univ., Daytona Beach Richard S. Stansbury is an assistant professor of computer science and computer engineering at Embry- Riddle Aeronautical University in Daytona Beach, FL. He instructs the capstone senior design course for computer and software engineering. His current research interests include unmanned aircraft, certification issues for unmanned aircraft, mobile robotics, and applied artificial intelligence. Massood Towhidnejad, Embry-Riddle Aeronautical Univ., Daytona Beach Massood Towhidnejad is a tenure full professor of software engineering in the department of Electrical, Computer, Software and System Engineering at Embry-Riddle Aeronautical University. His teaching interests include artificial intelligence, autonomous systems, and software engineering with emphasis on software quality assurance and testing. He has been involved in research activities in the areas of software engineering, software quality assurance and testing, autonomous systems, and human factors. Page 22.1643.1 Page c American Society for Engineering Education, 2011 Using the EcoCAR Challenge as a Non-Traditional Domain for Software and Computer Engineering Capstone Course Abstract: This paper presents the opportunities provided by EcoCAR: The NeXt Challenge in supporting a capstone design course in computer and software engineering. Students participating in the course were responsible for implementing a sub-system of a plug-in hybrid electric vehicle. Being a sponsored competition organized by the Department of Energy, the project provided many unique learning opportunities for students in the course and those that they interacted with from other disciplines. This paper will discuss both the benefits of utilizing such a competition for a senior capstone design course as well as some of the challenges faced.
    [Show full text]
  • Challenge-X 2008 DOE Merit Review Building on 19 Successful Years of Advanced Vehicle Technology Competitions Forrest Jehlik
    Advanced Vehicle Technology Competition: Challenge-X 2008 DOE Merit Review Building on 19 successful years of advanced vehicle technology competitions Forrest Jehlik This presentation does not contain any proprietary or confidential information Outline Current Competition Program Introduction/Overview Goals and Objectives Approach Collaborations/Interactions Performance Measures and Accomplishments Next Competition Program Introduction/Overview Summary Competition Introduction DOE has had a successful 19-year history of Advanced Vehicle Technology Competitions (AVTCs): 9 Methanol Marathon and Methanol Challenge (GM) 9 Natural Gas (GM), Ethanol (GM), and Propane Vehicle Challenges (DaimlerChrysler) 9 Sunrayce 1990 9 HEV Challenge and FutureCar (with PNGV-GM/Ford/DaimlerChrysler) 9 FutureTruck (GM/Ford/DaimlerChrysler) 9 Challenge X (final year-GM) EcoCAR (the next AVTC challenge) AVTCs integrate key DOE vehicle technologies Goals and Objectives Investigate, develop, and demonstrate a broad spectrum of advanced vehicle technologies aligned with DOE’s objectives: renewable fuels, energy diversity, advanced combustion, energy storage technology, electric machines, high power electronics, fuel cells, vehicle simulation modeling, and other critical technologies Explore technical solutions that minimize petroleum consumption and reduce well-to-wheel greenhouse gas emissions relative to current production counterparts Train the next generation of engineers to bring advanced technology vehicles into production while grooming future
    [Show full text]
  • Clean Fuels Advisor
    TENNESSEE Clean Fuels Advisor A quarterly publication from the partnership between the Clean Cities coalitions in Tennessee and the state of Tennessee. WINTER 2008 Bringing alternative fuels and hybrids to the forefront. Alt fuels = biodiesel, electricity, ethanol, hydrogen, natural gas and propane. Biofuels Enlightenment - Zenalgae Inside this Issue In a bold move to bring algae-based biodiesel pro- Algae oil production has been lauded by the Depart- duction to Tennessee in 2008, Northington Energy, LLC ment of Energy as having a very promising future. Al- Biofuels Enlightenment - Zenalgae 1 has acquired Zenalgae of Atlanta. though most recent algae-based research has been done State Provides Alt Fuels Innovations In the last couple of years, algae’s herculean oil-pro- in the private sector, the DOE said in 1998 that experi- Grants to Local Governments & ducing characteristics have been under the microscope ments bear out that algae may be the only viable method Public Universities 1 in more ways than one, as they can generate for producing enough fuel far more oil per acre than any of today’s to displace current world MLG&W Does the Right Thing 2 food or non-food crops. While soybeans gasoline usage. —which are the main resource used today Algae, which reproduc- City of Jackson - Sold on Biodiesel 2 in the U.S. to provide an oil for making es itself and its oils every six biodiesel—produce roughly 45-50 gallons of oil per acre, hours, has created excitement in the biodiesel industry The Science of Money, the Language of Business 2 algae has the potential to produce 1,000 gallons of oil because of its potential to produce much more substan- per acre..
    [Show full text]
  • New Battery to Last 10 Times As Long
    Energy Grants Back Plug-In Cars, Ethanol By Sholnn Freeman Washington Post Staff Writer Wednesday, January 24, 2007; Page D03 The Department of Energy announced yesterday $17 million in grants to support the development of battery technology for plug-in hybrid vehicles and ethanol, two areas in the energy debate where officials in Washington and Detroit are closely aligned. The money will be offered as two grants, one for $14 million for the plug-in technology and the other for $3 million for ethanol. The money for battery development is intended to improve the technology's performance. The $3 million in ethanol grants will support engineering advances to improve how flex-fuel engines use the E85 blend… Foreign automakers are stepping up complaints that U.S. government policy is unfairly backing ethanol and plug-ins at the expense of diesels and traditional gas-electric hybrids, such as the Toyota Prius. Toyota is pushing to continue federal incentives for the cars. Diesel-engine makers and European automakers such as BMW and DaimlerChrysler are asking for more federal support for diesel technology http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2007/01/23/AR2007012300870.html Ford Edge plug-in hybrid concept does 41mpg Mobilemag.com – USA. That HySeries Drive concept that was making the rounds at the Detroit Auto Show has been unleashed on the public in the form of the Ford Edge, launching the venerable American automaker firmly into the plug-in electric market. The new vehicle, running on a flexible powertrain, can guarantee up to 41mpg with no emissions. The innovative HySeries Drive uses a combination of gas engine, diesel engine, and fuel cell to achieve that rather remarkable mpg figure, which increases to 80 if you don't top 50 miles a day and, in the best cases, 400 miles between fill-ups.
    [Show full text]
  • Tennessee Engineer Newsletter, Spring 2007
    engineerg Vol. IX • Issue II • Spring 2007 A Newsletter for Alumni and Friends of the University of Tennessee’s College of Engineering Computer Science Merging with Electrical Engineering Energy for a Better Environment and Computer Engineering Department The term “global climate change” has made Plant, housed within the Department of The new Min Kao Electrical and Computer Engineer- its way from headlines to classrooms as Mechanical, Aerospace and Biomedical ing Building will now be home to a re-named and re- more and more professors turn toward their Engineering (MABE). The project started in invigorated department: the Department of Electrical research fields to contribute answers to the 2004 during UT’s Environmental Semester, Engineering and Computer Science (EECS). global energy problem. in which the university facilitated a grant competition for environmentally-related The merger of the Department of Electrical and “It is scientifically proven, without a doubt, projects. John Miller, mechanical engineer- Computer Engineering (ECE) and the Department of that global warming is a fact and human ing master’s student from the UT chapter of Computer Science (CS) was announced by UT Pro- activity plays a role,” said Dr. Loren Crabtree, the Society of Automotive Engineers (SAE), vost Robert Holub November 17, 2006. The joining of chancellor of the University of Tennessee, won the competition with a proposal for an the two departments will be official July 1, 2007. Knoxville. “The question now is how do on-campus biodiesel production plant. After we deal with population, energy and the “We have a task force working right now to final- Miller graduated, the project lost steam until ize details of the merger,” said Dr.
    [Show full text]
  • New Fuel Economy Testing
    MotorWeek Transcripts AUTOWORLD 'CHALLENGE X STUDENT COMPETITION' JOHN DAVIS: Automotive technology is evolving at a rapid clip, and so are the engineering practices used to develop new cars and trucks. This can be a problem for our nation’s colleges and universities, since today’s graduates can’t design tomorrow’s cars with yesterday’s knowledge. To provide hands-on experience actually developing an advanced-technology vehicle using industry practices, The US Department of Energy’s latest design competition invites North America’s brightest students to step up to… Challenge X. STUDENTS: This is where its really at. Everything is changing. This is where the jobs are going to be. It is really exciting and we will do what it takes. We will do the best. DAVIS: 2008 marks the fourth and final year for the Challenge X competition, in which teams from 17 engineering schools were given a stock 2005 Chevy Equinox and tasked with improving its emissions and fuel economy. The use of renewable fuels and advanced technologies was encouraged, and sponsors provided funding, technical support, and more importantly the advanced hardware needed to make their designs a reality. Headline sponsor General Motors provided the vehicles as well as mentoring support for each team, and allowed the competition to mimic its Global Vehicle Design Process, by which GM develops its own prototype vehicles. Year one of the competition focused on modeling, vehicle simulation, and deciding which approach to take. All chose some form of hybrid electric drivetrain, and many schools chose to burn biodiesel or ethanol while a few ambitious teams opted for Hydrogen fuel.
    [Show full text]
  • ADVANCED TECHNOLOGIES for TRANSPORTATION RESEARCH PROGRAM at the University of Tennessee at Chattanooga
    ADVANCED TECHNOLOGIES FOR TRANSPORTATION RESEARCH PROGRAM at the University of Tennessee at Chattanooga January 30, 2009 http://fta.dot.gov/research Report No. FTA-TN-26-7031-01-2009.1 NOTICE This document is disseminated under the sponsorship of the United States Department of Transportation in the interest of information exchange. The United States Government assumes no liability for its contents or use thereof. The United States Government does not endorse products of manufacturers. Trademarks or manufacturers’ names appear in the document only because they are essential to the objective of this report. The University of Tennessee at Chattanooga is an equal employment opportunity/affirmative action/Title VI/Title IX/Section 504/ADA/ADEA institution. Form Approved REPORT DOCUMENTATION PAGE OMB No. 0704-0188 1. AGENCY USE ONLY (LEAVE BLANK) 2. REPORT DATE 3. REPORT TYPE AND DATES COVERED January 30, 2009 Final Report March 15, 2007 – December 31, 2008 4. TITLE AND SUBTITLE 5. FUNDING NUMBERS Advanced Technologies for Transportation Research Program at the University of Tennessee at Chattanooga TN-26-7031-01 6. AUTHOR(S) Mark E. Hairr and J. Ronald Bailey, PhD, P.E. 7. PERFORMING ORGANIZATION NAME(S) AND ADDRESS(ES) 8. PERFORMING ORGANIZATION REPORT ATTRP NUMBER University of Tennessee at Chattanooga 615 McCallie Avenue R041301017-001-09 214 EMCS Bldg., Dept. 2522 Chattanooga, Tennessee 37403-2598 9. SPONSORING/MONITORING AGENCY NAME(S) AND ADDRESS(ES) 10. SPONSORING/MONITORING U.S. Department of Transportation AGENCY REPORT NUMBER Federal Transit Administration FTA-TN-26-7031-01-2009.1 Office of Research, Demonstration and Innovation 1200 New Jersey Avenue, SE Washington, DC 20590 11.
    [Show full text]
  • ITS in Energy Management Systems of PHEV's
    ITS in Energy Management Systems of PHEV's A Thesis Presented in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree Master of Science in the Graduate School of The Ohio State University By James Wollaeger, B.S. Graduate Program in Electrical and Computer Engineering The Ohio State University 2012 Master's Examination Committee: Umit¨ Ozg¨uner,Advisor¨ Giorgio Rizzoni Simona Onori c Copyright by James Wollaeger 2012 Abstract Intelligent Transportation Systems (ITS) is a broad category of research relating to new technologies that can improve systems in vehicles, such as safety or energy management. The studies in this thesis discuss how energy management systems can be improved with theories and information from ITS research areas. New types of vehicles are entering the marketplace now that include electric vehicles (EV's), hybrid electric vehicles (HEV's), and plug-in hybrid electric vehicles (PHEV's). HEV's and PHEV's are a particular challenge to control engineers because of the flexibility of their powertrains. These vehicles contain two power sources, their internal combustion engine and their battery-powered electric motor. The powersplit control problem will be discussed and how optimal control theory can be implemented to optimize the powersplit resulting in lower fuel consumption. Chapter 2 discusses the areas of ITS that are relevant to the PHEV control prob- lem. These include sourcing geographic data such as road grade and computing the length and geometry of a route to be traversed. Chapter 3 covers the Challenge X vehi- cle simulator and the dynamic equations that form the vehicle model. The Challenge X vehicle was designed for the 2004 Challenge X competition sponsored by General Motors where student teams competed to convert a small SUV into a hybrid electric vehicle.
    [Show full text]
  • 2006-2011 GATE Program at the Ohio State University
    2011 DOE Vehicle Technologies 2006-2011 GATE program at the Ohio State University: Modeling, control and system integration of advanced automotive propulsion systems Yann Guezennec Ohio State University May 12, 2011 Project ID #: ti015_guezennec This presentation does not contain any proprietary, confidential, or otherwise restricted information Program Overview Timeline Barriers • Start date: Oct. 1, 2005 • Barriers addressed: funding • End date: Sept. 30, 2011 stretched over 1 additional • Percent complete: 90% year Budget Partners • Total project funding • Interactions/ collaborations with – $670,000 received to date many automotive OEMs and (fully funded) suppliers • Project lead: Ohio State University 2 Overall Program Objectives Facilitate the education of the best engineers to support the DOE and industry Advanced Vehicle Programs • Develop and deploy a world-class curriculum in relevant technologies • Create value-added research knowledge in relevant supporting technologies • Support automotive industry competitiveness both with technically-savvy graduates and research programs focused on relevant technologies • Community outreach programs • Leverage available resources and maximize benefits 3 Overarching Scheme: Prepare engineers to integrate advanced powertrain and energy storage systems in vehicles to address societal needs Emission reduction and efficient energy conversion Society “Well-to-wheel” technology Vehicle assessment demonstrations Control-oriented Real-time control modeling Hardware-in-the- loop implementation Optimization
    [Show full text]
  • Challenge X General Description
    Quick Facts and Background Over the last decade, the American automotive customer market has tended toward larger family-sized vehicles because of the utility they provide over passenger cars that get better fuel economy. At the same time, there has been a greater demand to reduce energy consumption and vehicle emissions. As a result, the auto industry, the U.S. government, and the academic community have been working together, through a series of competitive programs, to develop and explore advanced vehicle technologies that address important energy and environmental issues. Since 1987, the U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) has sponsored more than two dozen competitions challenging thousands of engineering students to achieve better fuel economy and lower emissions while maintaining the safety, performance, utility, and consumer appeal of a variety of vehicles. Now, General Motors Corporation (GM), DOE, and other government and industry leaders have developed a new competition called Challenge X: Crossover to Sustainable Mobility. This ground-breaking, three-year competition will give engineering schools an opportunity to participate in hands-on research and development with leading-edge automotive propulsion, fuels, materials, and emissions-control technologies. Seventeen teams have been challenged to re-engineer a GM Equinox, a crossover sport utility vehicle to minimize energy consumption, emissions, and greenhouse gases while maintaining or exceeding the vehicle's utility and performance. Year 1 will focus on modeling, simulation, and testing of the vehicle powertrain and vehicle subsystems selected by each school. In June 2005, teams will come together to undergo extensive judging and evaluation. The teams that demonstrate a mastery of the key aspects of modeling their powertrain choice and constructing and controlling the powertrain will receive a donated GM Equinox after the June 2005 competition.
    [Show full text]
  • Team Brochure
    Prepared by: Asad Bhatti uwaft.ca 519-888-4567 EXT. 36208 E5-1011 200 /UWAFT UWAFT theUWAFT University Ave West Waterloo, ON. Competitions History 1998-2000 | Ethanol Vehicle Challenge In this challenge, UWAFT converted a Chevrolet Silverado to an E85 – 85%ethanol and 15% gasoline truck. The team placed 2nd overall among 16 universities. The truck was classified ultra-low emissions tested on a three-day road trip starting in Milford, MI and ending in Washington, DC. 2004-2007 | Challenge X Standing true to its name the Alternative Fuels Team converted a Chevrolet Equinox to utilize a 65 kW Hydrogenic Fuel Cell. This was paired to COBASYS Nickel Metal Hydride 336 V Battery that powered two 67 kW Ballard AC Induction Motors. Out of 17 universities, University of Waterloo stood 4th overall. Utilizing prior knowledge UWAFT 2008-2011 | EcoCAR acquired GM Fuel Cell and integrated it into the Saturn Vue. Utilizing H2 as the primary fuel, UWAFT amassed a 9.6 kWh 250 V storage system. This powered an E- AWD architecture with a combined system output of 177 kW, with minor weight penalties. Out of 16 Universities, University of Waterloo stood 3rd overall. Changing market trends required the 2012-2014 | EcoCAR2 team to switch gears to full hybrid architecture development. This was UWAFT’s first plug-in hybrid vehicle. The standard 2.4 L was tuned to run an E-85 Flex Fuel configuration. An 18.9 kWh, 340 V battery pack was developed in-house using A123 batteries. A parallel-series architecture was achieved using 2 105 kW TM4 Motors.
    [Show full text]