Rebound Intragastric Hyperacidity After Abrupt Withdrawal of Histamine

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Rebound Intragastric Hyperacidity After Abrupt Withdrawal of Histamine Gut, 1991,32, 1455-1460 1455 Rebound intragastric hyperacidity after abrupt withdrawal ofhistamine H2 receptor blockade Gut: first published as 10.1136/gut.32.12.1455 on 1 December 1991. Downloaded from C U Nwokolo, J T L Smith, A M Sawyerr, R E Pounder Abstract an extensive research programme investigating In a series of 24 hour studies, intragastric the phenomenon of tolerance during continued acidity and plasma gastrin concentration were H2 blockade.'2 '4 measured simultaneously in 46 healthy sub- jects before, during, and 24 to 48 hours after abrupt withdrawal of a histamine H2 receptor Methods antagonist regimen. For 34 days subjects were given either cimetidine 800 mg at night (n=8), SUBJECTS AND DRUG REGIMENS ranitidine 150 mg twice daily (n= 10), ranitidine Forty six of48 healthy men completed the study. 300 mg at night (n= 12), nizatidine 300 mg at Their median age was 21 years (range 19 to 24 night (n=8), or famotidine 40 mg at night years), median weight was 74 kg (range 60 to 96 (n=8). All subjects responded to H2 blockade kg), and median height was 1'80 m (range 1.67 to by a decrease in 24 hour intragastric acidity. 1-93 m). Twenty four smoked cigarettes (4-20 Withdrawal ofH2 blockade resulted in a signifi- cigarettes per day). None had been dosed with an cant rise in median nocturnal integrated intra- antisecretory drug for at least eight weeks before gastric acidity in 42 of46 subjects (+36%; 95% entry to this study. CI +19, +55%) compared with prestudy This study was 'open label,' and all the H2 values, but this rise was not associated with a blockers were supplied by the pharmacy of the significant change in the median integrated Royal Free Hospital, London. plasma gastrin concentration (+1%; 95% CI The subjects received no antisecretory drug -12, +13%). A statistically significant rise during the first 24 hour simultaneous study of in nocturnal acidity was observed after all intragastric acidity and plasma gastrin concen- regimens, except after dosing with famotidine. tration. They were then randomly assigned to After stopping, median daytime integrated receive one ofthe following regimens: cimetidine acidity and plasma gastrin concentrations in 800 mg at night (Smith Kline & French Labora- the whole group were raised, but not signifi- tories Ltd, n=8),'2 either ranitidine 300 mg at http://gut.bmj.com/ cantly: values were +15% (95% CI +4, +34%) night (n=12) or ranitidine 150 mg twice daily and +5% (95% CI -2, +12%), respectively. A (n= 10) (Glaxo Laboratories Ltd); nizatidine 300 statistically significant increase in daytime mg at night (n=8) (Eli Lilly and Co Ltd),'2 or acidity was observed only after dosing with famotidine 40 mg at night (n=8) (Thomas ranitidine. In conclusion, intragastric hyper- Morson Pharmaceuticals). 12 The experiments acidity occurs in most subjects after abrupt involving cimetidine, nizatidine, and famotidine withdrawal of a histamine H2 receptor blocker, were extensions of previously published studies on September 29, 2021 by guest. Protected copyright. but this phenomenon is not associated with investigating 'tolerance,' but the ranitidine hypergastrinaemia. experiments were not part of the earlier 'tolerance' experiments. 12 The subjects were dosed with an H2 receptor antagonist for 34 days, When the histamine H2 receptor antagonists and 24 hour profiles of intragastric acidity and were introduced for the management of peptic plasma gastrin concentration were measured for ulceration, there was concern that they would assessment of antisecretory activity on day 29 of induce a surge of gastric acid secretion in the dosing. The final 24 hour study of acidity and days or weeks after their withdrawal.' Experi- plasma gastrin concentration was begun 24 hours ments were performed to explore this possibility, after the last oral dose ofeach H2 blocker. but most reported that no rebound hypersecre- tion could be detected.2"'A It came as a surprise when Fullarton et al" EXPERIMENTAL DESIGN reported rebound nocturnal hypersecretion of The subjects were studied using the Royal Fzee acid occurring after four weeks of treatment with Hospital protocol,'2"' with minor changes as University Department of nizatidine mg at a Medicine, Royal Free 300 night. They found, in specified below. The subjects began fasting at Hospital School of group of eight duodenal ulcer patients, that 1330 hours, and were provided with a standard Medicine, London mean nocturnal acid output was 39.4 mmol/10 light supper at 1815 hours. They had nothing to C U Nwokolo hours before treatment, but rose significantly to eat or drink until 2130 hours, when a 10 FG J T L Smith A M Sawyerr 74-1 mmol/10 hours when measured two days Salem Sump nasogastric tube (Argyle Medical, R E Pounder after stopping. They observed no significant Crawley, West Sussex) was positioned in the Correspondence to: change in daytime intragastric acidity. stomach; its position was checked by a water Dr R E Pounder, University Department of Medicine, The object of this series of experiments was to recovery test. Aliquots (5-10 ml) of intragastric Royal Free Hospital School of measure 24 hour intragastric acidity and plasma contents were aspirated hourly throughout the Medicine, Pond Street, London NW3 2QG. gastrin concentration before, during, and after study, and the pH of each aliquot was measured Accepted for publication five different H2 antagonist regimens. These immediately to the nearest 0.01 pH unit by 18 March 1991 experiments were performed in conjunction with means of a glass electrode and digital pH meter 1456 Nwokolo, Smith, Sawyerr, Pounder LU r , Day 0 Gut: first published as 10.1136/gut.32.12.1455 on 1 December 1991. Downloaded from 1001 N N Day 29 Day 36 801F Day 36 0 E E 60 V ci Figure 1: 24 hour median 401F hourly intragastric acidity before dosing (), on day 29 ofdosing (-4--), and 24 20 hours after stopping cimetidine 800 mg at night (0 ), in eight healthy 5 a a a a 9 a a a a A a a a a a a a a a subjects. N=nightcap, B= 0 breakfast, C=coffee, L= 23 24 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 lunch, T=tea, D=dinner. Time (hours) 120 Day 0 0 100 Day 29 Day 36 80 ....... 0E E 60 40 Figure 2: 24 hour median 20 hourly acidity before dosing (-0-), on day 29 ofdosing (-4-), and 24 hours after 0 stopping ranitidine 150 mg http://gut.bmj.com/ twice daily( a , in 10 23 24 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 healthy subjects. Time (hours) 120 Day 0 Day 29 on September 29, 2021 by guest. Protected copyright. Day 36 .......* .... 0 E E E C.) Figure 3: 24 hour median hourly intragastric acidity before dosing (-0-), on day 29 ofdosing (-4), and 24 hours after stopping - ranitidine 300 mg at night (* a), in 12 healthy 23 24 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 subjects. Time (hours) (Radiometer, Copenhagen). The electrode was Newbury). The tubes were centrifuged immedi- calibrated with standard buffers (pH 7-00, 4.01, ately, and the plasma transferred to plastic tubes and 1.09; Radiometer, Copenhagen) before and and frozen to -20°C. All the plasma samples after every six samples in each hourly batch of from each subject were analysed for gastrin in aspirates. one batch, by radioimmunoassay using the anti- Every hour from 2300 hours to 2300 hours the body GAS 179 in Professor Bloom's laboratory next day (apart from 0100, 0300, 0500, and 0700 at the Royal Postgraduate Medical School hours) blood was taken via a venous cannula for London. 16 assay of the plasma gastrin concentration. The The subjects were fully ambulant around the blood was collected in lithium heparin tubes ward during the study. The food and environ- which contained 0-2 ml aprotinin (Bayer UK Ltd, mental conditions for all studies were identical to Rebound intragastric hyperacidity after abrupt withdrawal ofhistamine H2 receptor blockade 1457 120 Day 0 Gut: first published as 10.1136/gut.32.12.1455 on 1 December 1991. Downloaded from 100 N A B Day 29 I Day 36 <80 l 60 < 40 Figure 4: 24 hour median 20 hourly intragastnc acidity before dosing (-4-), on day 29 ofdosing (-4), and 24 hours after stopping 0 * nizatidine 300mg at night 23 24 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 (- ),ineight healthy subjects. Time (hours) 120 _ Day 0 0 100oo N B C L T D N Day 29 Day 36 80 .......* .. 0 E E 60 : a U 40 V Figure 5: 24 hour median hourly intragastric acidity 20 h before dosing (-4-), on day 29 ofdosing (@--), and 24 http://gut.bmj.com/ hours after stopping 0 famotidine 40 mg at night (* a), in eight healthy 23 24 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 subjects. Time (hours) those used in earlier experiments at the Royal ing dose of ranitidine 150 mg was taken by one Free Hospital.'5 The standard meals (bedtime group at 0830 hours. snack, breakfast, coffee, lunch, tea and dinner) on September 29, 2021 by guest. Protected copyright. were eaten at 2245, 0815, 1045, 1315, 1545, and 1815 hours, respectively. The bedtime doses of STATISTICAL ANALYSES medication were taken at 2305 hours; the morn- Profiles ofintragastric acidity and plasma gastrin concentration and were obtained for each sub- TABLE I Median integrated nocturnal (2400-0800 hours) intragastric acidity (mmol.hll) in 46 healthy subjects before, during, and after dosing with an H2 antagonist regimen ject.
Recommended publications
  • Carboxylic Acid Derivates
    Europaisches Patentamt 0 367 484 J> European Patent Office CO Publication number: A1 Office europeen des brevets © EUROPEAN PATENT APPLICATION A61K 31/29 © Application number: 89310994.2 © int. ci.5: C07D 233/64 , C07D 277/42 C07D 277/28 @ Date of filing: 25.10.89 C07D 295/08 C07D 249/14 C07D 211/20 C07D 417/04 © Priority: 26.10.88 GB 8825058 © Applicant: GLAXO GROUP LIMITED 26.06.89 GB 8914631 Clarges House 6-12 Clarges Street London W1Y8DH(GB) © Date of publication of application: 09.05.90 Bulletin 90/19 © Inventor: Clitherow, John Watson 54, Gilders © Designated Contracting States: Sawbridgeworth Hertfordshire(GB) AT BE CH DE ES FR GB GR IT LI LU NL SE © Representative: Marchant, James Ian et al Elkington and Fife Beacon House 113 Kingsway London WC2B 6PP(GB) © Carboxylic acid derivates. © The invention relates to salts formed between basic H2-receptor antagonists and a complex of bismuth with a carboxylic acid, and solvate of such salts, excluding salts in which the basic H2-receptor antagonist is ranitidine. Examples of suitable carboxylic acids are citric acid and tartaric acid. Examples of basic rVreceptor antagonists are cimetidine, sufotidine famotidine and nizatidine. The salts ares useful in the treatment of gastrointestinal disorders, particularly gastroduodenal conditions. The salts show the antisecretory activity associated with the basic H2-receptor antagonist together with antibacterial activity against Campylobacter pylori and they also possess cytoprotective properties. 00 (0 a. LU Xerox Copy Centre EP 0 367 484 A1 CARBOXYLIC ACID DERIVATIVES This invention relates to salts of compounds having antagonist activity at histamine H2- receptors, to a process for the preparation thereof, to pharmaceutical compositions containing them and to their use in therapeutics.
    [Show full text]
  • Pharmacology and Toxicology of Metiamide, a Histamine H
    9 November 1974 S.-A. MEDIESE TYDSKRIF 2253 Pharmacology and Toxicology of Metiamide, a - Histamine H2 Receptor Antagonist R. W. BRIMBLECOMBE, W. A. M. DUNCAN, M. E. PARSONS SUMMARY x 10-'M on atrial muscle and 7,5 x lO-rM on uterine muscle. Even. at lO-'M, metiamide did not inhibit the A brief review of the pharmacology and toxicology of effects of isoprenaline on either of these tissues neither did it inhibit the effects of histamine on isolated Quinea- metiamide, a histamine H2-receptor antagonist, is given, ~ and evidence is presented to support the view that it pig ileum (mediated through H,-receptors). inhibits gastric acid secretion by virtue of its Hrreceptor Metiamide is also an inhibitor of gastric acid secretion. antagonist activity. Its effectiveness was estimated in two preparations: the Studies are also reported which show that metiamide lumen-perfused stomach of the anaesthetised rat' and given either intravenously or intraduodenally inhibits his­ the conscious Heidenhain pouch dog, prepared 1 - 3 years tamine- or pentagastrin-stimulated acid secretion in human before experimentation. Metiamide was given by rapid subjects. llltravenous injection during a maximal plateau of acid secretion stimulated by either histamine or pentagastrin, and the dose required to reduce this level of secretion by S. Afr. Med. J., 48, 2253 (1974). 50% (ED",) was estimated. The results are shown in Table I and indicate that the ED", values are very similar Conventional antihistaminic drugs, such as mepyramine. even in high concentrations, fail to inhibit histamine­ against those of both histamine and pentagastrin. Doses of stimulated gastric acid secretion.
    [Show full text]
  • United States Patent (19) (11) 4,310,524 Wiech Et Al
    United States Patent (19) (11) 4,310,524 Wiech et al. 45 Jan. 12, 1982 (54) TCA COMPOSITION AND METHOD FOR McMillen et al., Fed. Proc., 38,592 (1979). RAPD ONSET ANTDEPRESSANT Sellinger et al., Fed. Proc., 38,592 (1979). THERAPY Pandey et al., Fed. Proc., 38,592 (1979). 75) Inventors: Norbert L. Wiech; Richard C. Ursillo, Primary Examiner-Stanley J. Friedman both of Cincinnati, Ohio Attorney, Agent, or Firm-Millen & White 73) Assignee: Richardson-Merrell, Inc., Wilton, Conn. (57 ABSTRACT A method is provided for treating depression in a pa (21) Appl. No.: 139,498 tient therefrom and requiring rapid symptomatic relief, (22 Filed: Apr. 11, 1980 which comprises administering to said patient concur 51) Int. Cl. .................... A61K 31/33; A61K 31/135 rently (a) an effective antidepressant amount of a tricy clic antidepressant or a pharmaceutically effective acid (52) ...... 424/244; 424/330 addition salt thereof, and (b) an amount of an a-adrener 58) Field of Search ................................ 424/244, 330 gic receptor blocking agent effective to achieve rapid (56) References Cited onset of the antidepressant action of (a), whereby the PUBLICATIONS onset of said antidepressant action is achieved within Chemical Abst., vol. 66-72828m, (1967), Kellett. from 1 to 7 days. Chemical Abst, vol. 68-94371a, (1968), Martelli et al. A pharmaceutical composition is also provided which is Chemical Abst., vol. 74-86.048j, (1971), Dixit et al. especially adapted for use with the foregoing method. Holmberg et al., Psychopharm., 2,93 (1961). Svensson, Symp. Med. Hoechst., 13, 245 (1978). 17 Claims, No Drawings 4,310,524 1.
    [Show full text]
  • (12) United States Patent (10) Patent No.: US 9,642,912 B2 Kisak Et Al
    USOO9642912B2 (12) United States Patent (10) Patent No.: US 9,642,912 B2 Kisak et al. (45) Date of Patent: *May 9, 2017 (54) TOPICAL FORMULATIONS FOR TREATING (58) Field of Classification Search SKIN CONDITIONS CPC ...................................................... A61K 31f S7 (71) Applicant: Crescita Therapeutics Inc., USPC .......................................................... 514/171 Mississauga (CA) See application file for complete search history. (72) Inventors: Edward T. Kisak, San Diego, CA (56) References Cited (US); John M. Newsam, La Jolla, CA (US); Dominic King-Smith, San Diego, U.S. PATENT DOCUMENTS CA (US); Pankaj Karande, Troy, NY (US); Samir Mitragotri, Santa Barbara, 5,602,183 A 2f1997 Martin et al. CA (US); Wade A. Hull, Kaysville, UT 5,648,380 A 7, 1997 Martin 5,874.479 A 2, 1999 Martin (US); Ngoc Truc-ChiVo, Longueuil 6,328,979 B1 12/2001 Yamashita et al. (CA) 7,001,592 B1 2/2006 Traynor et al. 7,795,309 B2 9/2010 Kisak et al. (73) Assignee: Crescita Therapeutics Inc., 8,343,962 B2 1/2013 Kisak et al. Mississauga (CA) 8,513,304 B2 8, 2013 Kisak et al. 8,535,692 B2 9/2013 Pongpeerapat et al. (*) Notice: Subject to any disclaimer, the term of this 9,308,181 B2* 4/2016 Kisak ..................... A61K 47/12 patent is extended or adjusted under 35 2002fOOO6435 A1 1/2002 Samuels et al. 2002fOO64524 A1 5, 2002 Cevc U.S.C. 154(b) by 204 days. 2005, OO 14823 A1 1/2005 Soderlund et al. This patent is Subject to a terminal dis 2005.00754O7 A1 4/2005 Tamarkin et al.
    [Show full text]
  • Antagonism of Histamine-Activated Adenylate Cyclase in Brain by D
    Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA Vol.74, No. 12, pp. 5697-5701, December 1977 Medical Sciences Antagonism of histamine-activated adenylate cyclase in brain by D-lysergic acid diethylamide (histaminergic antagonists/adenosine 3':5'-cyclic monophosphate/H2-receptors/ergots/D-2-bromolysergic acid diethylamide) JACK PETER GREEN, CARL LYNN JOHNSON, HAREL WEINSTEIN, AND SAUL MAAYANI Department of Pharmacology, Mount Sinai School of Medicine of the City University of New York, 100th Street and Fifth Avenue, New York, New- York 10029 Communicated by Vincent P. Dole, August 19, 1977 ABSTRACT D-Lysergic acid diethylamide and D-2-bro- (ED50; amount necessary to produce half-maximal response) molysergic acid diethylamide are competitive antagonists of and antagonist affinities (pA2) were not altered. the histamine activation of adenylate cyclase [ATP pyrophos- Adenylate Cyclase Assay. The assay system has been de- phate-lyase (cyclizing); E.C. 4.6.1.11 in broken cell preparations in All additions of the hippocampus and cortex of guinea pig brain. The ade- scribed (8). All assays were performed triplicate. nylate cyclase is linked to the histamine H2-receptor. Both D- were made to the assay tubes on ice. They were then transferred lysergic acid diethylamide and D-2-bromolysergic acid dieth- to a 30° shaking incubator and preincubated for 5 min to allow ylamide show topological congruency with potent H2-antago- the enzymatic activity to reach a steady state and to eliminate nists. D-2-Bromolysergic acid diethylamide is 10 times more the influence of any lag periods in hormone activation. After potent as an H2-antagonist than cimetidine, which has been the the preincubation period, 25 of [a-32PJATP (1-2 gCi) were most potent H2-antagonist reported, and D-lysergic acid di- pl ethylamide is about equipotent to cimetidine.
    [Show full text]
  • The Influence of Prolonged Cimetidine Administration on Serum Gastrin Levels and Gastric Acid Secretion in Rats
    Physiol Res. 41:467-469, 1992 SHORT COMMUNICATION The Influence of Prolonged Cimetidine Administration on Serum Gastrin Levels and Gastric Acid Secretion in Rats A. KOHÚT, O. MAHELOVÁ Department of Pharmacology, Faculty of Medicine, Šafárik University, Kosice Received July 8, 1992 Accepted October 12, 1992 Summary The correlation between serum gastrin levels and gastric acid secretion during 4 weeks of cimetidine administration (once daily) was investigated. Serum gastrin levels and gastric acid secretion were estimated on the 7th, 14th, 21st and 28th day after cimetidine administration (25 mg.kg'1, intragastrically). At the mentioned time intervals gastric acid secretion stimulated by histamine and pentagastrin was also studied. It was found that on the 14th and 21th day after cimetidine administration serum gastrin levels were significantly elevated. Basal gastric acid secretion after cimetidine administration was significantly decreased at all the observed time intervals. Histamine-stimulated gastric acid secretion was increased on the 14th, 21st and 28th day after cimetidine administration Hypoacidity was not followed at all time intervals by hypergastrinaemia (only on day 14 and 21 after cimetidine). Key words Cimetidine - Gastrin concentration - Gastric acid output H2-receptor antagonists (cimetidine, (SIGMA) was given orally (through a gastric tube) in a ranitidine, famotidine) which are potent inhibitors of single dose of 25 mg.kg'1 (dissolved in 0.5 % gastric acid secretion, have proved to be an effective methylcellulose, pH 9.0 - prepared with NaOH). form of treatment of gastric ulceration. It is known that For estimation of the serum gastrin levels and inhibition of acid secretion raises the pH in the gastric gastric acid secretion rats which had fasted for 24 h antrum.
    [Show full text]
  • Drug and Medication Classification Schedule
    KENTUCKY HORSE RACING COMMISSION UNIFORM DRUG, MEDICATION, AND SUBSTANCE CLASSIFICATION SCHEDULE KHRC 8-020-1 (11/2018) Class A drugs, medications, and substances are those (1) that have the highest potential to influence performance in the equine athlete, regardless of their approval by the United States Food and Drug Administration, or (2) that lack approval by the United States Food and Drug Administration but have pharmacologic effects similar to certain Class B drugs, medications, or substances that are approved by the United States Food and Drug Administration. Acecarbromal Bolasterone Cimaterol Divalproex Fluanisone Acetophenazine Boldione Citalopram Dixyrazine Fludiazepam Adinazolam Brimondine Cllibucaine Donepezil Flunitrazepam Alcuronium Bromazepam Clobazam Dopamine Fluopromazine Alfentanil Bromfenac Clocapramine Doxacurium Fluoresone Almotriptan Bromisovalum Clomethiazole Doxapram Fluoxetine Alphaprodine Bromocriptine Clomipramine Doxazosin Flupenthixol Alpidem Bromperidol Clonazepam Doxefazepam Flupirtine Alprazolam Brotizolam Clorazepate Doxepin Flurazepam Alprenolol Bufexamac Clormecaine Droperidol Fluspirilene Althesin Bupivacaine Clostebol Duloxetine Flutoprazepam Aminorex Buprenorphine Clothiapine Eletriptan Fluvoxamine Amisulpride Buspirone Clotiazepam Enalapril Formebolone Amitriptyline Bupropion Cloxazolam Enciprazine Fosinopril Amobarbital Butabartital Clozapine Endorphins Furzabol Amoxapine Butacaine Cobratoxin Enkephalins Galantamine Amperozide Butalbital Cocaine Ephedrine Gallamine Amphetamine Butanilicaine Codeine
    [Show full text]
  • Further Analysis of Anomalous Pkbvalues for Histamine
    Br. J. Pharmac. (1985), 86, 581-587 Further analysis ofanomalous pKB values for histamine H2-receptor antagonists on the mouse isolated stomach assay J.W. Blackk, P. Leff* & N.P. Shankley The Rayne Institute, King's College Hospital Medical School, Denmark Hill, London SE5 8RX and Wellcome Research Laboratories*, Langley Court, Beckenham, Kent, BR3 3BS 1 Agonist-antagonist interactions at histamine receptors have been re-examined using improved techniques, on the mouse isolated, lumen-perfused, stomach gastric acid assay. 2 Using histamine as agonist, pKB values have been estimated for burimamide, metiamide, cimetidine, ranitidine, oxmetidine and famotidine on both the gastric and guinea-pig isolated right atrium assays. With the exception of oxmetidine on the atrial assay, these compounds behaved as competitive antagonists on both assays. 3 Oxmetidine significantly depressed basal rate on the atrial assay and the Schild plot slope parameter (0.81) was significantly less than one. 4 The pKB values estimated on the gastric assay were lower than those on the atrial assay. However, the difference between the values on the gastric and atrial assays was not constant. The difference between the two assays for famotidine was not significant. 5 We conclude that the apparent varying selectivity ofthe antagonists for gastric and atrial histamine H2-receptors may be explained by the differential loss ofantagonists into the gastric secretion from the receptor compartment and that there is no need to postulate heterogeneity ofhistamine H2-receptors. Introduction Angus & Black (1979) and Angus et al. (1980) found Pearce (1981) did not find a low pKB for metiamide that the histamine H2-receptor antagonists, using the rat isolated gastric mucosa preparation for burimamide, metiamide and cimetidine behaved as the assay.
    [Show full text]
  • Platelets by Burimamide G
    Br. J. Pharmac. (1980), 71, 157-164 INHIBITION OF THROMBOXANE A2 BIOSYNTHESIS IN HUMAN PLATELETS BY BURIMAMIDE G. ALLAN, K.E. EAKINS*, P.S. KULKARNI* & R. LEVI Department of Pharmacology, Cornell University Medical College, New York, N.Y. and *Departments of Opthalmology and Pharmacology, Columbia University College of Physicians & Surgeons, New York, N.Y., U.S.A. 1 Burimamide selectively inhibited the formation of thromboxane A2 from prostaglandin endoper- oxides by human platelet microsomes in a dose-dependent manner (IC50 = 2.5 x 10-5 M). Burima- mide was found to be equipotent to imidazole as a thromboxane synthetase inhibitor. 2 Metiamide, cimetidine and a series of compounds either bearing a structural or pharmacological relationship to histamine caused little or no inhibition of thromboxane A2 biosynthesis by human platelet microsomes. 3 Burimamide (5 x 10-4 to 2.3 x 10- M) did not inhibit either the cyclo-oxygenase or the prosta- cyclin synthetase of sheep seminal vesicles or the prostacyclin synthetase of dog aortic microsomes. 4 Burimamide (2.5 x 10'- to 1.2 x 10-4 M) inhibited sodium arachidonate-induced human platelet aggregation; the degree of inhibition was dependent upon the concentration of arachidonic acid used to aggregate the platelets. Introduction The prostaglandin endoperoxides (prostaglandin G2, (Gryglewski, Zmuda, Korbut, Krecioch & Bieron, H2), the first cyclo-oxygenated products of arachido- 1977). nic acid metabolism can be converted enzymatically Various imidazole derivatives were studied by into either primary prostaglandins such as prosta- Moncada et al. (1977) and of these, only one-methyl glandin E2, F2, or D2, the non-prostanoate throm- imidazole was found to be a potent inhibitor of boxane A2 or prostacyclin (Moncada, Gryglewski, thromboxane A2 biosynthesis.
    [Show full text]
  • Selective and Competitive Histamine H2-Receptor Blocking Effect of Famotidine on the Blood Pressure Response in Dogs and the Acid Secretory Response in Rats
    Selective and Competitive Histamine H2-Receptor Blocking Effect of Famotidine on the Blood Pressure Response in Dogs and the Acid Secretory Response in Rats Keiji MIYATA, Takeshi KAMATO, Akira FUJIHARA and Masaaki TAKEDA Department of Pharmacology, Medicinal Research Laboratories I, Yamanouchi Pharmaceutical Co., Ltd., 21 Miyukigaoka, Tsukuba , Ibaraki 305, Japan Accepted July 17, 1990 Abstract-Famotidine has been already demonstrated to be a competitive H2- receptor antagonist in the stomachs of dogs and cats. The present experiments were carried out to examine the effects of famotidine on changes in blood pressure induced by dimaprit and several other agonists in vagotomized, anesthetized dogs and on changes in gastric acid secretion induced by histamine in stomach-perfused, anesthetized rats. Famotidine caused a parallel displacement of the dimaprit dose-response curve to the right with a DR10 value of 0.059 ƒÊmol/kg, indicating that famotidine is 166 times more potent than cimetidine in vascular H2-blocking activity. On the contrary, famotidine did not affect the depressor responses to 2- pyridylethylamine and histamine that were antagonized by mepyramine. The histamine dose-response curve was displaced to the right more markedly after simultaneous administration of mepyramine and famotidine than after mepyramine alone. The effects of methacholine, phenylephrine and isoproterenol on blood pressure were not influenced by famotidine in doses up to 720 nmol/kg. In rats, famotidine also caused a parallel displacement of the acid dose-response curve to histamine to the right with a DR3 value of 24 ƒÊmol/kg/hr in stomach-perfused rats anesthetized with pentobarbital, exhibiting a potency 108 times greater than that of cimetidine.
    [Show full text]
  • Effervescent H2 Blocker Formulation
    Europaisches Patentamt European Patent Office © Publication number: 0 492 247 A1 Office europeen des brevets EUROPEAN PATENT APPLICATION © Application number: 91121064.9 © int. CIA A61K 31/34, A61K 9/00 @ Date of filing: 09.12.91 ® Priority: 21.12.90 US 633230 @ Inventor: Paulos, Manley A. 15626 Cold Springs Court @ Date of publication of application: Indiana 01.07.92 Bulletin 92/27 Granger, 46530(US) © Designated Contracting States: AT BE CH DE DK ES FR GB GR IT LI LU NL SE © Representative: Danner, Klaus, Dr. et al c/o Bayer AG Konzernverwaltung RP © Applicant: MILES INC. 1127 Myrtle Street Patentabteilung ElkhartJN 4651 5(US) W-5090 Leverkusen 1 Bayerwerk(DE) (§v Effervescent H2 blocker formulation. © An aqueous solution of H2 Blocker and an effervescent delivery system. Immediate and continuous relief is provided for from about 1 to about 3 hours, even when the administered composition contains less than about 25 percent of the dosage of H2 Blocker prescribed for active duodenal ulcer. 7.0 r 0,3mg/kg+0,0mEq 7.0 0,3 mg/kg + 32mEq 0,0mg/kg+0,0mEq 0,0mg/kg +0,0mE q 6.0 6,0 5,0 5,0 Xa. *4.0 :4.0 ^3.0 :3,0 1^2,0 h is 2,0 1.0 h 1.0 ■ 0.0 _i i ■ ■ 0.0 CM -60 0 60 120 180 240 -60 0 60 120 180 240 Time After Dosing (Minutes) CM Time After Dosing (Minutes) Oi FIG.1Q FIG.Id Rank Xerox (UK) Business Services EP 0 492 247 A1 Background of the Invention Histamine H2 receptor blocking agents (referred to herein as H2 Blockers) are a class of drugs which act as antagonists of the histamine H2 receptor.
    [Show full text]
  • (12) Patent Application Publication (10) Pub. No.: US 2002/0102215 A1 100 Ol
    US 2002O102215A1 (19) United States (12) Patent Application Publication (10) Pub. No.: US 2002/0102215 A1 Klaveness et al. (43) Pub. Date: Aug. 1, 2002 (54) DIAGNOSTIC/THERAPEUTICAGENTS (60) Provisional application No. 60/049.264, filed on Jun. 6, 1997. Provisional application No. 60/049,265, filed (75) Inventors: Jo Klaveness, Oslo (NO); Pal on Jun. 6, 1997. Provisional application No. 60/049, Rongved, Oslo (NO); Anders Hogset, 268, filed on Jun. 7, 1997. Oslo (NO); Helge Tolleshaug, Oslo (NO); Anne Naevestad, Oslo (NO); (30) Foreign Application Priority Data Halldis Hellebust, Oslo (NO); Lars Hoff, Oslo (NO); Alan Cuthbertson, Oct. 28, 1996 (GB)......................................... 9622.366.4 Oslo (NO); Dagfinn Lovhaug, Oslo Oct. 28, 1996 (GB). ... 96223672 (NO); Magne Solbakken, Oslo (NO) Oct. 28, 1996 (GB). 9622368.0 Jan. 15, 1997 (GB). ... 97OO699.3 Correspondence Address: Apr. 24, 1997 (GB). ... 9708265.5 BACON & THOMAS, PLLC Jun. 6, 1997 (GB). ... 9711842.6 4th Floor Jun. 6, 1997 (GB)......................................... 97.11846.7 625 Slaters Lane Alexandria, VA 22314-1176 (US) Publication Classification (73) Assignee: NYCOMED IMAGING AS (51) Int. Cl." .......................... A61K 49/00; A61K 48/00 (52) U.S. Cl. ............................................. 424/9.52; 514/44 (21) Appl. No.: 09/765,614 (22) Filed: Jan. 22, 2001 (57) ABSTRACT Related U.S. Application Data Targetable diagnostic and/or therapeutically active agents, (63) Continuation of application No. 08/960,054, filed on e.g. ultrasound contrast agents, having reporters comprising Oct. 29, 1997, now patented, which is a continuation gas-filled microbubbles stabilized by monolayers of film in-part of application No. 08/958,993, filed on Oct.
    [Show full text]