Ring-Fencing Overview July 2020
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Load more
Recommended publications
-
PRIVACY NOTICE Privacy Notice
PRIVACY NOTICE Privacy Notice Page 1. Who we are 3 2. The information we process 3 3. How we obtain information 4 4. Your rights 5 Table A – Your Rights 5 5. Changes to the way we use your information 6 6. How we use and share your information with other NatWest group companies 6 7. Sharing with third parties 6 8. Transferring information overseas 7 9. Marketing information 7 10. Communications about your account 7 11. Credit reference and fraud prevention agencies 7 12. How long we keep your information 8 13. Security 9 Schedule A – Schedule of Purposes of Processing A. Contractual necessity 10 B. Legal obligation 10 C. Legitimate interests of the bank 11 02 Privacy Notice 1. Who we are 1.1. This privacy notice (the ‘Privacy Notice’) applies to all personal information processing activities carried on by the businesses of the *Royal Bank of Scotland International Limited (RBS International). *RBS International also trades as NatWest International, Isle of Man Bank and Coutts Crown Dependencies. 1.2. RBS International is a data controller in respect of personal information that we process in connection with our business (including the products and services that we provide). In this notice, references to ‘we’, ‘us’ or ‘our’ are references to RBS International. 1.3. The Royal Bank of Scotland International Limited trades in Jersey, Guernsey and the Isle of Man as Coutts Crown Dependencies. The Royal Bank of Scotland International Limited Registered Office: P.O. BOX 64, Royal Bank House, 71 Bath Street, St. Helier, Jersey JE4 8PJ. Tel 00 44 1534 282345. -
Cross-Border Financial Institutions in the EU: Analysis of Total Assets and Ultimate Ownership
Directorate-General for Internal Policies Directorate A - Economic and Scientific Policy Policy Department A.: Economic and Scientific Policy and Quality of Life Unit Cross-Border Financial Institutions in the EU: Analysis of Total Assets and Ultimate Ownership Briefing Note IP/A/ECON/NT/2008-10 PE 408.550 Only published in English. Author: Josina KAMERLING Policy Department Economy and Science DG Internal Policies European Parliament Rue Wiertz 60 - ATR 00L046 B-1047 Brussels Tel: +32 (0)2 283 27 86 Fax: +32(0)2 284 69 29 E-mail: [email protected] Arttu MAKIPAA Policy Department Economy and Science DG Internal Policies European Parliament Rue Wiertz 60 - ATR 00L042 B-1047 Brussels Tel: +32 (0)2 283 26 20 Fax: +32(0)2 284 69 29 E-mail: [email protected] Manuscript completed in August 2008. The opinions expressed in this document do not necessarily represent the official position of the European Parliament. Reproduction and translation for non-commercial purposes are authorised provided the source is acknowledged and the publisher is given prior notice and receives a copy. Rue Wiertz – B-1047 Bruxelles - 32/2.284.43.74 Fax: 32/2.284.68.05 Palais de l‘Europe – F-67000 Strasbourg - 33/3.88.17.25.56 Fax: 33/3.88.36.92.14 E-mail: [email protected] IP/A/ECON/NT/2008-10 PE 408.550 Table of Contents 1. The Data on Financial Institutions in EU27 ......................................................................1 2. Largest Financial Institutions in Europe (Tables 1-5) .......................................................2 -
Risk Management Strategies for Cattlemen
RISK MANAGEMENT STRATEGIES FOR CATTLEMEN Kurtis Ward – President/CEO www.kisokc.com As a former agricultural loan officer, I witnessed first-hand the effects that the Dairy Herd Buyout Program had on the Cattle Market of 1986. During this time, I became intrigued by cattlemen who used some form of risk management (Futures, Options, Forward Contracting, etc.) as compared to those who did nothing but speculate on the cash market. It didn’t take long to observe which group made better financial and marketing decisions (perhaps that “hedging stuff” that my college professors were teaching was really important after all). This market event caused my loan officer career to be transformed into a new profession as a commodity futures broker who specialized in risk management strategies for cattlemen. However, my naïve belief back then was that everyone else was having this “illumination” about cattle hedging at the same time. In the 1980’s, it was said that less than 5% of cattlemen were involved in risk management. Fifteen years later, things haven’t changed much which is quite surprising when you look at the total dollars now at risk in any cattle operation. After what we’ve seen during the cattle market of the past two years, I truly believe that cattlemen cannot afford to be just cattlemen any longer. Rather, they must first be “businessmen” who incidentally invest their, time, money and livelihood in a cattle operation. Therefore, the purpose of this article is to quickly review the basics of several risk management strategies in a way that is very simplistic so that the foundational hedging precepts can be easily understood. -
Energy-Related Commodity Futures
Universit¨atUlm Institut f¨urFinanzmathematik Energy-Related Commodity Futures Statistics, Models and Derivatives Dissertation zur Erlangung des Doktorgrades Dr. rer. nat. der Fakult¨at f¨urMathematik und Wirtschaftswissenschaften an der Universit¨at Ulm RSITÄT V E U I L N M U · · S O C I D E N N A D R O U · C · D O O C D E N vorgelegt von Dipl.-Math. oec. Reik H. B¨orger, M. S. Ulm, Juni 2007 ii . iii . Amtierender Dekan: Professor Dr. Frank Stehling 1. Gutachter: Professor Dr. R¨udiger Kiesel, Universit¨at Ulm 2. Gutachter: Professor Dr. Ulrich Rieder, Universit¨atUlm 3. Gutachter: Professor Dr. Ralf Korn, Universit¨at Kaiserslautern Tag der Promotion: 15.10.2007 iv Acknowledgements This thesis would not have been possible without the financial and scientific support by EnBW Trading GmbH. In particular, I received instructive input from Dr. Gero Schindlmayr. He suggested many of the problems that have been covered in this work. In numerous discussions he gave insight into physical and financial details of commodities and commodity markets. I also benefited from his suggestions on aspects of the mathematical models and their applicability to practical questions. I take the opportunity to thank my academic advisor Professor Dr. R¨udiger Kiesel who initiated the collaboration with EnBW from the university’s side and who supported my studies in every possible respect. I highly appreciate his confidence in my work and his encouragement which resulted in an enjoyable working environment that goes far beyond the usual conditions. I thank the members of the Institute of Financial Mathematics at Ulm University, in particular Gregor Mummenhoff, Clemens Prestele and Matthias Scherer, for the many mathematical and non-mathematical activities that enriched my time in Ulm. -
Grain Price Options Fence
File A2-69 December 2005 www.extension.iastate.eu/agdm Grain Price Options Fence uring periods of high prices, farmers are Example. often interested in forward pricing crops. DHowever, many are concerned about using Assume November soybean futures price is $10 forward cash contracts, hedge-to-arrive contracts, per bu. because of severely dry conditions in the or hedging for fear that prices may go even higher. corn belt. The strike prices and option premiums Buying put options would relieve these worries. But are: premiums to buy puts rise sharply as prices become more volatile. Strike Premiums Price Calls Puts $9.75 $1.15 $ .77 Building a fence 10.00 .98 .88 Building a fence by using options is an alternative 10.25 .89 1.05 you might want to consider. By building a fence 10.50 .78 1.21 around your net price, you set a minimum price un- 10.75 .72 der which the price cannot fall and a maximum price 11.00 .67 over which the net price cannot rise. To build a fence you buy a put option with a strike price just below A $10 strike price put premium is 88 cents. the current future price and sell (write) a call option Selling a $10.50 strike price call premium is 78 cents. The net premium cost is 10 cents/bu. with a strike price above the current futures price. ($.88 - .78 = $.10). The put option establishes a floor price for your grain. The call option establishes a ceiling price. For Minimum selling price information on how to use options refer to: The minimum selling price from the fence is the strike • Grain Price Options Basics, File A2-66 price of the put option, less the net premium cost, less • Options Tools to Reduce Price Risk, the options trading costs, less the basis. -
A Landowner's Guide to Fence Law in Texas
EAG-029 1/17 A Landowner’s Guide to Fence Law in Texas Tiffany D. Lashmet James D. Bradbury Assistant Professor Partner, James D. Bradbury, PLLC and Extension Specialist Austin–Fort Worth Kyle K. Weldon Student, Texas A&M University School of Law ii Preface This book arose out of a late afternoon call from a rural county in Texas. Two landowners could not agree on a fencing question and called the county for help. The county judge called us, and after a few minutes of discussion regarding the question, we realized that Texas landowners need a field guide for fencing questions. The three of us work with Texas landowners, and we get more questions about fencing than any other topic. And, while there are thousands of miles of barbed wire across the state, we lack an easy-to-use resource to answer the everyday questions that arise between landowners. Another lengthy law book would not fit in the glove box of a pickup, so we kept this short and easy-to-follow. It may not answer every question, but it should cover most. And, remember, the law will never substitute for an understanding between two neighbors over a cup of coffee. iii iv Table of Contents iii Preface 1 Introduction 3 Liability for Livestock on the Roadway 3 Open Range vs. Closed Range 3 Local Stock Laws 7 U.S. and State Highways 9 Landowners and Emergency Responders 9 Road/Highway Liability Examples 11 Liability for Livestock on Neighboring Land 11 My neighbor’s cattle are on my land. -
2020 Annual Report Adaptation Makes Things Work
2020 Annual Report Adaptation makes things work GUERNSEY - JERSEY - ISLE OF MAN CEO’s Statement WELCOME If ever there was a year for business to adapt to changing circumstances, it was 2020. At a time when we needed to adapt to the rapidly changing environment, we still saw excellent growth in our lending volume and a continuation of very low levels of bad debt. So, despite the pandemic and all the difficulties it caused, I am delighted to record that we achieved a 9% increase in our lending volume. Annual Report 2020 1 CEO’s Statement Continued I would like to thank our dedicated and very loyal staff who have worked extremely hard to make this happen, especially since we had to make rapid provision for our local teams to work remotely. This report provides the highlights º We have continued to apply the same º With Grant Thornton’s continued º Both our Jersey and Isle of Man of our business for the calendar year strict lending criteria that we have oversight as our Auditors, there have operations are continuing to grow ending December 2020. As always, always used, to ensure the quality been no issues raised in any of their in line with expectations. With our we will provide a further update on of our lending. We will not at any quarterly reports, which serves retail partner networks expanding our performance for the fiscal year, point be looking to grow the size to demonstrate the security of the considerably, we have seen ending June 2021, at our annual of our lending activity by taking Loan Notes. -
Deloitte Alternative Lender Deal Tracker – Q1 2017
The race for GDP growth: Europe closes in on US Deloitte Alternative Lender Deal Tracker Q1 2017 For future copies of this publication, please sign-up via our link at www.deloitte.co.uk/dealtracker Financial Advisory This issue covers data for the first quarter of 2017 and includes 79 Alternative Lender deals, representing an increase of 7% in deal flow on a last 12 months basis in comparison with the previous year. © Deloitte Alternative Capital Solutions Alternative Lender Deal Tracker Q1 2017 | Contents Contents Deloitte Alternative Lender Deal Tracker 4 Leveraged loan mid-market trends for Direct Lenders 6 Direct Lenders facilitate the expansion of Ansett Aviation Training 8 Alternative Lender Deal Tracker Q1 2017 10 Alternative Lending in action: Spotlight on the Italian market 16 Direct Lending fundraising 20 Recent Direct Lending moves 26 Deloitte’s CFO survey 28 Insights into the European Alternative Lending Market 32 Deloitte Debt and Capital Advisory 45 © Deloitte Alternative Capital Solutions 3 Alternative Lender Deal Tracker Q1 2017 | Deloitte Alternative Lender Deal Tracker Deloitte Alternative Lender Deal Tracker Welcome to the fifteenth issue of the Deloitte Alternative Lender Deal Tracker which now covers 59 leading Alternative Lenders, with whom Deloitte is tracking primary mid-market deals across Europe. The number of deals reported on has increased to 1011 transactions over the past 18 quarters. This issue covers data for the first quarter of 2017 and includes 79 Alternative Lender deals, representing an increase of 7% in deal flow on a last 12 months (LTM) basis compared with prior year. Business confidence remains volatile. -
Company Registered Number: 2304 the ROYAL BANK of SCOTLAND
Company Registered Number: 2304 THE ROYAL BANK OF SCOTLAND INTERNATIONAL LIMITED ANNUAL REPORT AND ACCOUNTS 31 December 2020 Contents Page Board of directors and secretary 1 Report of the directors 2 Statement of directors’ responsibilities 6 Independent auditor’s report to the members of the Royal Bank of Scotland International Limited 7 Income statement for the year ended 31 December 2020 10 Statement of comprehensive income for the year ended 31 December 2020 11 Balance sheet as at 31 December 2020 12 Statement of changes in equity for the year ended 31 December 2020 13 Cash flow statement for the year ended 31 December 2020 14 Accounting policies 15 Notes to the accounts 21 The Royal Bank of Scotland International Limited Annual Report and Accounts 2020 Board of directors and secretary Chairman John Philip Ward Brewster Executive directors Andrew Martin McLaughlin Chief Executive Officer Lynn Ann Cleary Chief Financial Officer Non-executive directors Louis Philip Chetwynd Taylor (resigned 31 October 2020) Stuart Porteous Bruce Mark Cannon Gregory John Branch Christine Hilary Ashton (appointed 14 September 2020) Company Secretary Rachael Emma Pocklington (resigned 1 September 2020) Andrew Nicholson (appointed 1 September 2020) Auditor Ernst & Young LLP Castle Street St Helier Jersey JE1 1EY Registered office and Head office Royal Bank House 71 Bath Street St Helier Jersey JE4 8PJ The Royal Bank of Scotland International Limited Registered in Jersey, Channel Islands No. 2304 1 The Royal Bank of Scotland International Limited Annual Report and Accounts 2020 Report of the directors Presentation of information Business review The directors of The Royal Bank of Scotland International The Bank’s purpose, which is aligned with NatWest Group, is Limited (the “Company”/“RBS International”/”RBSI”/the “Bank”) to champion potential, helping people, families and businesses present their annual report, together with the audited financial to thrive. -
Covered Bonds, Core Markets, and Financial Stability
A Service of Leibniz-Informationszentrum econstor Wirtschaft Leibniz Information Centre Make Your Publications Visible. zbw for Economics Anand, Kartik; Chapman, James; Gai, Prasanna Working Paper Covered bonds, core markets, and financial stability SFB 649 Discussion Paper, No. 2012-065 Provided in Cooperation with: Collaborative Research Center 649: Economic Risk, Humboldt University Berlin Suggested Citation: Anand, Kartik; Chapman, James; Gai, Prasanna (2012) : Covered bonds, core markets, and financial stability, SFB 649 Discussion Paper, No. 2012-065, Humboldt University of Berlin, Collaborative Research Center 649 - Economic Risk, Berlin This Version is available at: http://hdl.handle.net/10419/79593 Standard-Nutzungsbedingungen: Terms of use: Die Dokumente auf EconStor dürfen zu eigenen wissenschaftlichen Documents in EconStor may be saved and copied for your Zwecken und zum Privatgebrauch gespeichert und kopiert werden. personal and scholarly purposes. Sie dürfen die Dokumente nicht für öffentliche oder kommerzielle You are not to copy documents for public or commercial Zwecke vervielfältigen, öffentlich ausstellen, öffentlich zugänglich purposes, to exhibit the documents publicly, to make them machen, vertreiben oder anderweitig nutzen. publicly available on the internet, or to distribute or otherwise use the documents in public. Sofern die Verfasser die Dokumente unter Open-Content-Lizenzen (insbesondere CC-Lizenzen) zur Verfügung gestellt haben sollten, If the documents have been made available under an Open gelten abweichend -
Dodd Frank One Year Later Key Current Issues for Financial
Alert Memo NEW YORK & WASHINGTON, DC JULY 27, 2011 Dodd Frank: One Year Later Key Current Issues for Financial Institutions One year after President Obama signed the Dodd-Frank Act, Congress, the Administration, financial institutions, their regulators and the American public are stepping back and asking where we stand today. Although global and domestic financial institutions and markets have largely stabilized, they remain under pressure from a variety of sources, including slow U.S. economic growth, a looming European debt crisis, potential economic challenges in Asia, and a relatively high degree of geo-political volatility. These and other considerations make it difficult to assess the true impact of the Dodd-Frank Act, which is widely viewed as the most significant U.S. financial services legislation in generations. Critics have suggested that the Act failed to accomplish its main goals—including solving “too big to fail” (a multi-faceted policy challenge). And whether the Act will effectively address the root causes of the financial crisis will remain an open question, at least as long as there is a lack of consensus regarding what those root causes were. So, where do we stand on the first anniversary of the Dodd-Frank Act? We are at only the beginning of a multi-year regulatory implementation process, with the vast majority of regulatory standards yet to be implemented. Regulators are under pressure to write significant numbers of regulations that address complex issues and, in some cases must implement ambiguous statutory provisions. They face pressure from some on Capitol Hill to write the rules quickly but at the same time satisfy frequently conflicting views as to the legislative intent behind the laws they must implement—a daunting challenge. -
The Royal Bank of Scotland Group Plc 27 April 2018 Ring Fenced Structure
The Royal Bank of Scotland Group plc 27 April 2018 Ring Fenced Structure - Director Changes The Royal Bank of Scotland Group plc (together with its subsidiaries "RBS") today announces changes to the composition of boards of Directors in connection with the Ring- Fencing Transfer Scheme (the "Scheme") under Part VII of the Financial Services and Markets Act 2000 which is expected to be implemented on 30 April 2018. Implementation of the Scheme will be a significant step towards the restructuring of RBS to comply with the UK ring-fencing legislation that requires the separation of essential banking services from investment banking services from 1 January 2019. As previously announced, under the Scheme, The Royal Bank of Scotland plc (RBS plc) will: transfer its UK retail & commercial banking business to Adam & Company PLC (Adam); transfer its covered bonds in issue and Mentor business to National Westminster Bank Plc (NatWest); and transfer branches and other properties to either NatWest or Adam. At the same time, RBS plc will be renamed “NatWest Markets Plc”, Adam will be renamed “The Royal Bank of Scotland plc” and assume banknote-issuing responsibility. After the Scheme and subsequent restructuring is completed in 2018, NatWest Holdings Limited will have direct ownership of The Royal Bank of Scotland plc (formerly Adam & Company plc), National Westminster Bank Plc and Ulster Bank Ireland DAC. NatWest Holdings Limited will have indirect ownership of Coutts & Company and Ulster Bank Limited. The non-ring-fenced entities will be NatWest Markets Plc (formerly RBS plc) that will continue to undertake RBS’s finance, risk management and trading activities; and The Royal Bank of Scotland International Limited (RBSI), along with Isle of Man Bank Limited, which will continue to serve the markets and customers it serves today.