An Analysis of Social Justice in Teacher Education Using W. B. Gallie's Framework Patricia Banta
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
University of South Florida Scholar Commons Graduate Theses and Dissertations Graduate School 4-5-2016 An Analysis of Social Justice in Teacher Education Using W. B. Gallie's Framework Patricia Banta Follow this and additional works at: http://scholarcommons.usf.edu/etd Part of the Higher Education and Teaching Commons Scholar Commons Citation Banta, Patricia, "An Analysis of Social Justice in Teacher Education Using W. B. Gallie's Framework" (2016). Graduate Theses and Dissertations. http://scholarcommons.usf.edu/etd/6064 This Dissertation is brought to you for free and open access by the Graduate School at Scholar Commons. It has been accepted for inclusion in Graduate Theses and Dissertations by an authorized administrator of Scholar Commons. For more information, please contact [email protected]. An Analysis of Social Justice in Teacher Education Using W. B. Gallie’s Framework by Patricia Banta A dissertation submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy In Curriculum and Instruction with an emphasis in Interdisciplinary Education College of Education University of South Florida Major Professor: Barbara Shircliffe, Ph.D. Jeffery Kromrey, Ph.D. Sarah Kiefer, Ph.D. Zorka Karanxha, Ph.D. Date of Approval: March 30, 2016 Keywords: recognition, social change, equality, critical consciousness Copyright © 2016, Patricia Banta DEDICATION This dissertation is dedicated to three very important people in my life. First to my parents Kenneth D. Naumann and M. Mary Naumann who both made untold sacrifices to educate and raise their six children. They instilled in each of their children a love of learning, the drive to persevere through hardship, and the ability to see the good in the world. Second to my wonderful and beloved husband, Tom Banta, who supported and encouraged me throughout my journey. ACKNOWLEDGMENTS I would like to express my sincere appreciation to my committee for their time and support. I especially wish to express my gratitude to Dr. Barbara Shircliffe. She provided the guidance and encouragement to bring this project to completion. I am particularly grateful to her for listening to my ideas, providing feedback, and encouraging me to delve deeper into the issues relevant to this project. I also wish to thank and express appreciation for the wisdom, advice and time provided by Dr. Kromrey, Dr. Kiefer and Dr. Karanxha. TABLE OF CONTENTS List of Tables………………….……………….…………………………………………………iii Abstract……………………….………….…….…………………………………………………iv Chapter One: Introduction…………………………….…………………………………………..1 Statement of the Problem.………………...……………………………………………...14 Purpose of the Study..……………………………………………..……………………..15 Research Questions.………………………………………...……………………………16 Importance of the Study.……...……………………………………………………….…17 Chapter Two: Literature Review……....………………..……………………………………….20 History of the Concept Social Justice………………………..…………………………..20 Contemporary Theories of Social Justice………………...……………………………...28 Social Justice as a Concept in Education and Teacher Education.………………………32 Gallie’s Theory of Essentially Contested Concepts.……….………..…………………...61 Review of Gallie’s Seven Criteria.…………………………………..…………………..74 Appraisiveness.……………………………………..……………………………74 Internal complexity………………………………………………………………75 Various describability……………………..……………………………………..76 Open in character.…..……………………………………………………………76 Reciprocal recognition………...…………………………………………………77 Original exemplar……………...………………………………………………...78 Progressive competition.………..…………………………….………………….82 Conclusion………..……………………………………………………………………...83 Chapter Three: Research Methods………..…….………………………………………………..86 Qualitative Content Analysis…………….………………………………………………89 Data Sources and Selection Criteria.…….………………………………………………95 Data Analysis and Coding.………………………………………………………………96 Trustworthiness………………………...……………………………………………….100 Chapter Four: Finding..…………………………………………………………………………104 Appraisiveness………………...………………………………………………………..105 Internal Complexity and Various Describability…………………………………...…..110 Openness………………………………………………………………………………..125 Reciprocal recognition………………………………………………………………….128 Exemplar………………………………………………………………………………..145 i Progressive Competition…………………………………….…………………………148 Terminological Contestation...…………………………………………………………160 Conclusion……………………………………………………………………………...166 Chapter 5: Discussion, Recommendations, and Conclusion………………………………...…168 Discussion………………………………………………………………………………170 Research Question One…………………………………………………………………170 Research Question Two………………………………………………………………...182 Limitations……………………………………………………………………………...184 Recommendations………………………………………………………………………185 Conclusion……………………………………………………………………………...189 References…….………………….…………………………………………………..…………191 Appendices..……………………………….……………………………………………...…….212 Appendix A: Table 1 Initial Coding Categories and Operational Codes…………….…213 Appendix B: Table 2 List and Description of Aspects of Social Justice…………….....214 Appendix C: List of Data Source Articles.……………………………………………..216 Appendix D: Table 4 Descriptive Characteristics of Data Source….………………….224 ii LIST OF TABLES Table 1: Initial Coding Categories and Operational Definitions………………………………212 Table 2: List and Description of Aspects of Social Justice…………………………………….213 Table 3: Aspects of Social Justice……………………………………………………………...115 Table 4: Descriptive Characteristics of Data Source.…………………………………………..224 iii ABSTRACT Essentially contested concepts result in continual disagreement over their meaning and use because important consequences flow from these disputes. Evidence of the contested nature of the concept social justice, in the context of teacher education, is documented in academic literature. Empirical evidence of the contested nature of the term is found in the transcripts of National Council for Accreditation of Teacher Education (NCATE)’s 2006 reauthorization hearing. Scholars note the complex nature of social justice and that teacher educators and colleges of education frequently use the term (e.g. Hytten & Bettez, 2011; North, 2008; Zollers, Albert, & Cochran-Smith, 2000). This study focuses on the various understandings and applications of the concept social justice in academic writing within teacher education. A directed qualitative content analysis of academic journal articles, guided by Gallie’s (1956) framework, was conducted to identify how the phrase, social justice, is used in the context of teacher education. Gallie’s framework was chosen because it has proved a useful tool to analyze complex concepts (Collier, Hidalgo & Maciuceani, 2006). One of Gallie’s goals in designing his framework was to help scholars’ reason about complex concepts. This study found evidence to support the classification of social justice as an essentially contested concept in teacher education. Additionally, this study found indications in the data that the term may be terminologically contested in the context of teacher education and recommends further investigation. I argue that teacher educators interested in social justice as a reform measure for iv teacher education should define the concept and come to a consensus about what social justice in teacher education means. The lack of precision in the term makes debate over the merits of concept, in the context of teacher education, difficult. v CHAPTER ONE Introduction In 2006, the U. S. Department of Education’s National Advisory Committee on Institutional Quality and Integrity (NACIQI) held a hearing to reauthorize the National Council for the Accreditation of Teacher Education’s (NCATE) as an accrediting entity for teacher education programs. The following organizations, the National Association of Scholars (NAS), the Foundation for Individual Rights in Education (FIRE), and the American Council of Trustees and Alumni (ACTA), objected to the use of the term social justice in the NCATE standards relating to pre-service teachers’ dispositions. FIRE, a nonpartisan civil rights group concerned primarily with free speech and the right to private conscience on college campuses, argued inclusion of the language was tantamount to allowing teacher-training programs to subject pre- service teachers to a political litmus test (Lukianoff, 2012). The NAS felt inclusion of the language made students vulnerable to the “the ideological caprices of instructors and programs” (National Association of Scholars, June 5, 2006, np). These groups maintained the term social justice is ill-defined, vague, and value-laden. The NAS, FIRE, and ACTA appeared at the hearing to argue that the inclusion of the phrase, social justice, in accreditation standards authored by NCATE created the possibility that Colleges of Education could require students to subscribe to a particular ideology as a condition for graduation, thus violating the students’ First Amendment rights. Moreover, the primary accrediting agency’s decision to highlight social justice as an appropriate pre-service teacher’s 1 disposition was considered problematic for other reasons as well. Anne Neal, representing ACTA, argued NCATE was the motivating force behind teacher education programs adopting non-academic assessments like a “disposition toward social justice” and significantly reducing the focus on knowledge and learning which is the Department of Education’s primary concern (NACIQI, 2006, p. 286). During the hearing, NCATE’s President, Dr. Wise, denied that NCATE had any standard or requirement that its institutions indoctrinate teacher candidates with a particular political or social ideology, specifically social justice.