Vol. 76 Tuesday, No. 192 October 4, 2011 Pages 61249–61554
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Load more
Recommended publications
-
Guide to the Flora of the Carolinas, Virginia, and Georgia, Working Draft of 17 March 2004 -- LILIACEAE
Guide to the Flora of the Carolinas, Virginia, and Georgia, Working Draft of 17 March 2004 -- LILIACEAE LILIACEAE de Jussieu 1789 (Lily Family) (also see AGAVACEAE, ALLIACEAE, ALSTROEMERIACEAE, AMARYLLIDACEAE, ASPARAGACEAE, COLCHICACEAE, HEMEROCALLIDACEAE, HOSTACEAE, HYACINTHACEAE, HYPOXIDACEAE, MELANTHIACEAE, NARTHECIACEAE, RUSCACEAE, SMILACACEAE, THEMIDACEAE, TOFIELDIACEAE) As here interpreted narrowly, the Liliaceae constitutes about 11 genera and 550 species, of the Northern Hemisphere. There has been much recent investigation and re-interpretation of evidence regarding the upper-level taxonomy of the Liliales, with strong suggestions that the broad Liliaceae recognized by Cronquist (1981) is artificial and polyphyletic. Cronquist (1993) himself concurs, at least to a degree: "we still await a comprehensive reorganization of the lilies into several families more comparable to other recognized families of angiosperms." Dahlgren & Clifford (1982) and Dahlgren, Clifford, & Yeo (1985) synthesized an early phase in the modern revolution of monocot taxonomy. Since then, additional research, especially molecular (Duvall et al. 1993, Chase et al. 1993, Bogler & Simpson 1995, and many others), has strongly validated the general lines (and many details) of Dahlgren's arrangement. The most recent synthesis (Kubitzki 1998a) is followed as the basis for familial and generic taxonomy of the lilies and their relatives (see summary below). References: Angiosperm Phylogeny Group (1998, 2003); Tamura in Kubitzki (1998a). Our “liliaceous” genera (members of orders placed in the Lilianae) are therefore divided as shown below, largely following Kubitzki (1998a) and some more recent molecular analyses. ALISMATALES TOFIELDIACEAE: Pleea, Tofieldia. LILIALES ALSTROEMERIACEAE: Alstroemeria COLCHICACEAE: Colchicum, Uvularia. LILIACEAE: Clintonia, Erythronium, Lilium, Medeola, Prosartes, Streptopus, Tricyrtis, Tulipa. MELANTHIACEAE: Amianthium, Anticlea, Chamaelirium, Helonias, Melanthium, Schoenocaulon, Stenanthium, Veratrum, Toxicoscordion, Trillium, Xerophyllum, Zigadenus. -
The Vascular Flora of Sandy Run Savannas State Natural Area, Onslow and Pender Counties, North Carolina --In Press-- John B
The Vascular Flora of Sandy Run Savannas State Natural Area, Onslow and Pender Counties, North Carolina --In Press-- John B. Taggart Department of Environmental Studies, University of North Carolina at Wilmington, 601 South College Road, Wilmington, North Carolina 28403 ______________________________________________________________________________ ABSTRACT The vascular plants of Sandy Run Savannas State Natural Area, located in portions of Onslow and Pender counties, North Carolina, are presented as an annotated species list. A total of 590 taxa in 315 genera and 119 families were collected from eight plant communities. Families with the highest numbers of species were the Asteraceae (80), Poaceae (66), and Cyperaceae (65). Two species, Carex lutea (golden sedge) and Thalictrum cooleyi (Cooley’s meadowrue), have federal endangered status. A total of 23 taxa are tracked by the North Carolina Natural Heritage Program, while 29 others are considered rare, but not included on the priority list. Of 44 species considered strict endemic or near-endemic taxa to the North and South Carolina Coastal Plain, 18 (41%) were collected in this study. Selected pine savannas within the site were rated as nationally significant by the North Carolina Natural Heritage Program. Fifty-one (51) non-native species were present and represented 8.7 % of the flora. _________________________________________________________________________ INTRODUCTION Sandy Run Savannas State Natural Area encompasses portions of western Onslow and northeastern Pender counties in North Carolina. State acquisition of this coastal plain site began in 2007 as a cooperative effort between The Nature Conservancy in North Carolina and the North Carolina Division of Parks and Recreation to protect approximately 1,214 ha comprised of seven tracts (Figure 1). -
Floristic Composition of the South-Central Florida Dry Prairie Landscape Steve L
Floristic Composition of the South-Central Florida Dry Prairie Landscape Steve L. Orzell Avon Park Air Force Range, 29 South Blvd., Avon Park Air Force Range, FL 33825-5700 [email protected] Edwin L. Bridges Botanical and Ecological Consultant, 7752 Holly Tree Place NW, Bremerton, WA 98312-1063 [email protected] ABSTRACT Floristic composition of the Florida dry prairie landscape was compiled from 291 sites in nine south-central peninsular counties. Floristic lists were based upon field inventory and compilation from reliable sources to- taling 11,250 site and community type-specific observations and were analyzed by region (Kissimmee River, Desoto/Glades “Big Prairie,” and Myakka). The known vascular flora consists of 658 vascular plant taxa, rep- resenting 317 genera and 115 families. Families with the highest number of species are Poaceae (103), Asteraceae (78), Cyperaceae (76), Fabaceae (23), Scrophulariaceae (20), and Orchidaceae (18). The most diverse genera are Rhynchospora (29), Dichanthelium (17), Ludwigia (13), Xyris (12), and Andropogon (11). Of this flora 24 taxa are endemic to central or southern peninsular Florida, primarily within the pine savanna- flatwood/dry prairie landscape, and 41 taxa are of Floridian biotic affinity. Although most species are not re- gionally specific, a few (Carphephorus carnosus, Ctenium aromaticum, and Liatris spicata) appear to be ab- sent from the Myakka prairie region, while Marshallia tenuifolia appears to be absent from both the Desoto/ Glades and Myakka prairie regions. Within the dry prairie landscape Hypericum edisonianum is restricted to the Desoto/Glades region. A few other species somewhat differentiate between prairie regions; however, most occur in other habitats in the counties where they are absent or nearly absent from dry prairie. -
Cutthroat Grass Communities
Cutthroat Grass Communities utthroat grass (Panicum abscissum) is a central FNAI Global Rank: G2 peninsular Florida endemic species, found in FNAI State Rank: S2 Cscattered locations from Orange County south to Federally Listed Species in S. FL: 1 Palm Beach County. However, it seems to dominate natural State Listed Species in S. FL: 13 communities almost exclusively within Polk and Highlands counties, in association with the sideslopes of Cutthroat grass community. the central Florida Ridges. Cutthroat grass communities are Original photograph by Betty Wargo. mostly associated with areas of slight to strong groundwater seepage; however, not all cutthroat grass communities are well-developed seepage slopes. Cutthroat grass communities fall into several community types-a cutthroat grass seepage slope complex with 11 microhabitat zones, cutthroat grass mesic flatwoods and dry prairies, cutthroat grass wet flatwoods, cutthroat grass depression marsh margins, cutthroat grass ecotones between flatwoods and drainageways, cutthroat grass wet prairies, and slash pine/cutthroat grass basin swamp. Each of these can be characterized by differences in landform, topographic position, hydrology, soils, and dominant or characteristic plant species. The cutthroat grass seepage slope complex consists of distinct vegetation zones which vary in hydrology, soils, and species composition, ranging from dry cutthroat grass with only subsurface soil saturation, to mixed herbaceous seepage slopes with a constant year-round water table at the surface of the deep muck soil. Cutthroat grass communities require frequent fire for maintenance of the open, graminoid-dominated character of these areas. The greatest threats to the integrity of cutthroat grass communities are continued fire-suppression and drainage effects. -
Appendix G - Ecosystems and Species Diversity Report
Appendix G - Ecosystems and Species Diversity Report Land Management Plan Final Environmental Impact Statement This page intentionally left blank National Forests in Mississippi Appendix G Table of Contents APPENDIX G - ............................................................................... ECOSYSTEMS AND SPECIES DIVERSITY REPORT .......................................................................................................................................................................... G-1 G.1 INTRODUCTION ...................................................................................................................................... G-1 G.1.1 VIABILITY EVALUATION PROCESS .................................................................................................................... G-2 G.1.2 FORESTWIDE ECOLOGICAL SYSTEM SUSTAINABILITY ........................................................................................... G-2 G.1.3 ECOLOGICAL SYSTEM SUSTAINABILITY CHARACTERISTICS..................................................................................... G-5 Relative Abundance ........................................................................................................................................... G-5 Non-native Invasive Species ............................................................................................................................... G-5 Structure (old-growth forest) ............................................................................................................................ -
George J. Wilder Jean M. Mccollom Naples Botanical Garden Natural Ecosystems 4820 Bayshore Drive 985 Sanctuary Road Naples, Florida 34112-7336, U.S.A
A FLORISTIC INVENTORY OF CORKSCREW SWAMP SANCTUARY (COLLIER COUNTY AND LEE COUNTY), FLORIDA, U.S.A. George J. Wilder Jean M. McCollom Naples Botanical Garden Natural Ecosystems 4820 Bayshore Drive 985 Sanctuary Road Naples, Florida 34112-7336, U.S.A. Naples, Florida 34120-4800, U.S.A [email protected] [email protected] ABSTRACT Documented presently as growing wild within Corkscrew Swamp Sanctuary (Collier Co. and Lee Co., Florida, U.S.A) are individuals of 126 families, 401 genera, 756 species, and 773 infrageneric taxa of vascular plants. Those data, combined with records from previous workers, yield a total of 770 species and 787 infrageneric taxa documented for the Sanctuary. Of the 773 infrageneric taxa documented presently, 611 (79.0%) are native to Florida. Herein, seven main kinds of habitats are recognized for the study area, and individual taxa inhabit one or more of those habitats. Twenty-nine presently reported infrageneric taxa are listed as Endangered (16 taxa) or Threatened in Florida (13 taxa). For South Florida, 36 infrageneric taxa listed as Extirpated (3 taxa), as Historical (5 taxa), or as Critically Imperiled (28 taxa) were documented during this study. RESUMEN Existen documentados individuos de 126 familias, 401 géneros, 756 especies, y 773 taxa infragenéricos de plantas vasculares que actual- mente crecen silvestres en Corkscrew Swamp Sanctuary (Collier Co. y Lee Co., Florida, U.S.A). Estos datos, combinados con los registros de investigadores anteriores, dan un total de 770 especies y 787 taxa infragenéricos documentados para el Sanctuary. De los 773 taxa infra- genéricos documentados actualmente, 611 (79.0%) son nativos de Florida. -
Calopogon Multiflorus Lindley Other Commonly Used Names
Common Name: MANY-FLOWERED GRASS PINK Scientific Name: Calopogon multiflorus Lindley Other Commonly Used Names: none Previously Used Scientific Names: Calopogon barbatus (Walter) Ames var. multiflorus (Lindley) Correll Family: Orchidaceae (orchid) Rarity Ranks: G2G3/SH State Legal Status: Special Concern Federal Legal Status: none Federal Wetland Status: FACW Description: Perennial herb with 1 - 2 grass-like leaves at the base of the stem, 1 - 6 inches (3 - 15 cm) long and usually less than inch (9 mm) wide. Stem 7 - 20 inches (17 - 50 cm) tall, leafless, with 2 - 15 dark pink, fragrant flowers crowded at the top of a dark reddish-brown stalk; most flowers are open at the same time. Flowers with 2 spreading petals, an erect lip petal, and 3 spreading sepals. Petals widest above the middle, with a narrow base and bluntly pointed tip. Lip petal as wide as long, with a crest of yellow-orange bristles. Middle sepal usually less than inch (1.7 cm) long; lateral sepals spreading but not reflexed backwards. Fruit an erect capsule, ½ - inch (1.3 - 2.2 cm) long. Similar Species: Bearded grass pink (Calopogon barbatus) petals are widest below the middle and its flowers are not fragrant; it occurs in wet flatwoods. Tuberous grass pink (C. tuberosus) leaves are wider than 3/8 inch, the middle sepal is longer than ¾ inch (2 cm), and the petals are widest below the middle. Pale grass pink (C. pallidus) flowers are white or pale pink (rarely dark pink), and the lateral sepals are flexed backwards. Related Rare Species: Oklahoma grass pink (Calopogon oklahomensis) was last seen in Calhoun County in 1947. -
Natural Heritage Resources of Virginia: Rare Vascular Plants
NATURAL HERITAGE RESOURCES OF VIRGINIA: RARE PLANTS APRIL 2009 VIRGINIA DEPARTMENT OF CONSERVATION AND RECREATION DIVISION OF NATURAL HERITAGE 217 GOVERNOR STREET, THIRD FLOOR RICHMOND, VIRGINIA 23219 (804) 786-7951 List Compiled by: John F. Townsend Staff Botanist Cover illustrations (l. to r.) of Swamp Pink (Helonias bullata), dwarf burhead (Echinodorus tenellus), and small whorled pogonia (Isotria medeoloides) by Megan Rollins This report should be cited as: Townsend, John F. 2009. Natural Heritage Resources of Virginia: Rare Plants. Natural Heritage Technical Report 09-07. Virginia Department of Conservation and Recreation, Division of Natural Heritage, Richmond, Virginia. Unpublished report. April 2009. 62 pages plus appendices. INTRODUCTION The Virginia Department of Conservation and Recreation's Division of Natural Heritage (DCR-DNH) was established to protect Virginia's Natural Heritage Resources. These Resources are defined in the Virginia Natural Area Preserves Act of 1989 (Section 10.1-209 through 217, Code of Virginia), as the habitat of rare, threatened, and endangered plant and animal species; exemplary natural communities, habitats, and ecosystems; and other natural features of the Commonwealth. DCR-DNH is the state's only comprehensive program for conservation of our natural heritage and includes an intensive statewide biological inventory, field surveys, electronic and manual database management, environmental review capabilities, and natural area protection and stewardship. Through such a comprehensive operation, the Division identifies Natural Heritage Resources which are in need of conservation attention while creating an efficient means of evaluating the impacts of economic growth. To achieve this protection, DCR-DNH maintains lists of the most significant elements of our natural diversity. -
Alabama Inventory List
Alabama Inventory List The Rare, Threatened, & Endangered Plants & Animals of Alabama Alabama Natural August 2017 Heritage Program® TABLE OF CONTENTS ALABAMA NATURAL HERITAGE PROGRAM® ........................................................................... 1 CHANGES FROM ALNHP TRACKING LIST OF AUGUST 2015 .................................................. 3 DEFINITION OF HERITAGE RANKS ................................................................................................ 5 DEFINITIONS OF FEDERAL & STATE LISTED SPECIES STATUS ......................................... 10 VERTEBRATES ...................................................................................................................................... 13 Birds....................................................................................................................................................................................... 13 Mammals ............................................................................................................................................................................... 18 Amphibians ............................................................................................................................................................................ 21 Reptiles .................................................................................................................................................................................. 23 Lizards, Snakes, and Amphisbaenas ................................................................................................................................. -
December 2004, Volume 22 No. 4
On The Fringe Journal of the Native Plant Society of Northeastern Ohio 2004 Endowment Grant This year the two top applicants for the Endowment Grant were so close that it was decided by the Board to award the grant to Shya Chitaley and give a one-time gift of $500 to the Ohio Botanical Garden. Shya Chitaley, Paleobotanist Cleveland Museum of Natural History Ohio Botanical Garden The 360 Million Year Old Ohio Forest The Garden, founded by Hope Taft at the Governor’s Hundreds of pieces of plant fossils have been collected Residence, will represent Ohio’s many geographical from our local Upper Devonian Cleveland Shale and regions and native plant species. stored in the Cleveland Museum of Natural History. A Mrs. Taft’s hope is that the thousands of visitors who tour whole lycopsid fossil tree was salvaged during the the grounds will learn more about Ohio’s diverse climate construction of Interstate-71 and described in a 1996 and geologic history. Over 20 regional gardens will publication under the name Clevelandodendron recreate eco-systems from all over the state and will ohioensis gen. and sp. nov. The name was selected to demonstrate the residential use of native plants. There will celebrate the bicentennial of the city of Cleveland. This be a cranberry bog, an orchard and vine garden, an slender tree is significant globally in the evolution of Appalachian garden, a Lake Erie dune garden, an the modern clubmosses called Isoetis, quilwort. Allegheny garden, and a Prairie garden. In studying of the Cleveland Shale plants for the last 20 Mrs. -
A Comparison and Combination of Plastid Atpb and Rbcl Gene Sequences for Inferring Phylogenetic Relationships Within Orchidaceae Kenneth M
Aliso: A Journal of Systematic and Evolutionary Botany Volume 22 | Issue 1 Article 36 2006 A Comparison and Combination of Plastid atpB and rbcL Gene Sequences for Inferring Phylogenetic Relationships within Orchidaceae Kenneth M. Cameron New York Botanical Garden Follow this and additional works at: http://scholarship.claremont.edu/aliso Part of the Botany Commons Recommended Citation Cameron, Kenneth M. (2006) "A Comparison and Combination of Plastid atpB and rbcL Gene Sequences for Inferring Phylogenetic Relationships within Orchidaceae," Aliso: A Journal of Systematic and Evolutionary Botany: Vol. 22: Iss. 1, Article 36. Available at: http://scholarship.claremont.edu/aliso/vol22/iss1/36 MONOCOTS Comparative Biology and Evolution Excluding Poales Aliso 22, pp. 447-464 © 2006, Rancho Santa Ana Botanic Garden A COMPARISON AND COMBINATION OF PLASTID atpB AND rbcL GENE SEQUENCES FOR INFERRING PHYLOGENETIC RELATIONSHIPS WITHIN ORCHIDACEAE KENNETH M. CAMERON The Lewis B. and Dorothy Cullman Program for Molecular Systematics Studies, The New York Botanical Garden, Bronx, New York 10458-5126, USA ([email protected]) ABSTRACT Parsimony analyses of DNA sequences from the plastid genes atpB and rbcL were completed for 173 species of Orchidaceae (representing 150 different genera) and nine genera from outgroup families in Asparagales. The atpB tree topology is similar to the rbcL tree, although the atpB data contain less homoplasy and provide greater jackknife support than rbcL alone. In combination, the two-gene tree recovers five monophyletic clades corresponding to subfamilies within Orchidaceae, and fully resolves them with moderate to high jackknife support as follows: Epidendroideae are sister to Orchidoideae, followed by Cypripedioideae, then Vanilloideae, and with Apostasioideae sister to the entire family. -
Coefficients of Conservatism Values and the Floristic Quality Index for the Vascular Plants of South Florida
U.S. Department of the Interior U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service Coefficients of Conservatism Values and the Floristic Quality Index for the Vascular Plants of South Florida Coefficients of Conservatism Values and the Floristic Quality Index for the Vascular Plants of South Florida Steve Mortellaro1, Mike Barry 2, George Gann3, John Zahina4, Sally Channon5, Charles Hilsenbeck6, Douglas Scofield7, George Wilder8 and Gerould Wilhelm9 1U. S. Fish and Wildlife Service, 1339 20th Street, Vero Beach FL 32960 2U. S. Fish and Wildlife Service, Naples, FL (Formerly) 2Institute for Regional Conservation, 22601 S.W. 152 Ave., Miami, FL 33170 (Currently) 3Institute for Regional Conservation, 22601 S.W. 152 Ave., Miami, FL 33170 4 South Florida Water Management District, 3301 Gun Club Road, West Palm Beach, FL 5Palm Beach County Department of Environmental Resources Management, 2300 North Jog Rd, 4th Floor, West Palm Beach, FL 33411 6 17516 Birchwood Drive, Boca Raton, FL 33487 7University of California, Los Angeles, 1509 Life Sciences, Box 951786, Los Angeles, CA 90095-1786 8Naples Botanical Garden, 4820 Bayshore Drive, Naples, FL 34112 9Conservation Design Forum, Inc., 375 W. First Street, Elmhurst, IL 60126 January 2009 South Florida Ecological Services Field Office Vero Beach, Florida Table of Contents ABSTRACT.................................................................................................................................... 1 Introduction....................................................................................................................................