DOCSLIB.ORG

Evaluation of RIS Implementation for the Period 2006-2011

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Evaluation of RIS Implementation for the Period 2006-2011 Evaluation of RIS Implementation for the period 2006-2011 MAIN REPORT Zoetermeer , July 2014 The responsibility for the contents of this report lies with Panteia. Quoting numbers or text in papers, essays and books is permitted only when the source is clearly mentioned. Panteia does not accept responsibility for printing errors and/or other imperfections. 2 Table of contents Executive Summary i Background i General conclusions ii Specific conclusions iii Recommendations ix PART 1: DESCRIPTION OF RIS 1 1 Introduction 3 1.1 Background 3 1.2 Rationale for and timeframe of this evaluation 5 1.3 Key RIS actors and stakeholder groups 6 1.4 Structure of the report 6 2 General legislative context 7 2.1 Introduction 7 2.2 Relevant EU policy and legislation 7 2.3 International standards and policies 16 3 RIS facts and figures 19 3.1 Introduction 19 3.2 Description of RIS key technologies 20 3.3 Organisation of RIS implementation 22 3.4 RIS Waterway network 25 3.5 Findings in research literature on the uptake of key RIS technologies and services 41 PART 2: DATA AND EVALUATION METHODOLOGY 45 4 Evaluation Methodology 47 4.1 Background 47 4.2 Evaluation framework 47 4.3 Data collection methods 54 PART 3: EVALUATION FINDINGS 59 5 Transposition and Implementation of RIS legislation 61 5.1 Introduction 61 5.2 Sources and results, input for evaluation 61 5.3 State of transposition into national legislation 62 5.4 Assessment of the Evaluator 63 5.5 Other legal issues 73 6 Implementation of RIS key technologies and services 77 6.1 Interoperability of RIS 80 6.2 User uptake of RIS 82 6.3 Comparison with ITS in other modes and links to RIS 91 6.4 Identification of untapped potential and possible further applications 96 3 7 Governance of RIS 99 7.1 Effectiveness and efficiency of implementation of governance 99 7.2 Relevance of implementation activities for RIS 108 7.3 Adequacy of communication of RIS policy and supported projects 108 8 Provision and use of Financial Resources 111 8.1 Coherence and interrelationship EU funding/ MS funding/ private funding 111 8.2 Impact of economic crisis on funding 117 8.3 Effectiveness of support programmes 118 8.4 Identification of financing needs 123 9 Impacts of RIS 125 9.1 Impact of RIS implementation 2006-2011 126 9.2 Comparison of identified impacts with ex ante evaluation studies and their obstacles 139 PART 4: CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS 145 10 Conclusions of the evaluator 147 10.1 General conclusions 147 10.2 Specific conclusions 148 11 Recommendations 157 11.1 RIS policy objectives and barriers to address 157 11.2 RIS legislation 158 11.3 Technologies and services 158 11.4 Governance 161 11.5 RIS Financing 2014-2020 162 Annex 1 History of RIS 163 Annex 2 Detailed technical background 165 Annex 3 List of stakeholders 171 Annex 4 Country reports 175 Annex 5 Logframe table 177 Annex 6 RIS services and functions 181 Annex 7 Transposition table articles RIS directive 187 Annex 8 Transition of tonne kilometres to vessel kilometres 190 4 Bibliography 191 General RIS Definitions (Pianc) 195 Abbreviations 199 5 Executive Summary Background RIS Directive and legal framework In 2005 the European Parliament and the European Council adopted Directive 2005/44/EC, dealing with Harmonised River Information Services (RIS) on Inland Waterways of the Community. The so-called “RIS Directive” aims to establish a framework for the deployment and use of harmonised RIS in the Community, in order to support inland waterway transport with a view to enhancing safety, efficiency and environmental performance and to facilitate interfaces with other transport modes. The definition of RIS, as stated in the RIS Directive (2005/44), is the following: “River information services means that the harmonised information services to support traffic and transport management in inland navigation, including, wherever technically feasible, interfaces with other transport modes. RIS do not deal with internal and commercial activities between one or more of the involved companies, but are open for interfacing with commercial activities. RIS comprise services such as fairway information, traffic information, traffic management, statistics and custom services and waterway charges and port dues”. Besides the RIS Directive, the following European regulations are in force, jointly forming the legislative framework: • Implementation guidelines, RIS Guidelines: 414/2007; • Notice to skippers: 415/2007; • Tracking and Tracing 416/2007 and 689/2012; • Electronic reporting 164/2010; • Electronic chart display and information system for inland navigations (inland ECDIS): 909/2013; • Directive 2013/49/EU amending Annex II to Directive 2006/87/EC addressing the issues related to the Unique European Vessel Identification Number (ENI) and the European Hull Database. Directive 2005/44/EC and the RIS guidelines specify the applicability of the legislation, the responsibilities of Member States, the minimum requirements for RIS, the services to be provided and the technical specifications to be applied. The regulations 415/2007, 416/2007, 164/2010 and 909/2013 provide the specific information and provide answers on the question how the technologies are to be implemented (notices to skippers, tracking and tracing and electronic reporting). Evaluation of RIS Policy Article 4(7) of the RIS Directive requires the European Commission (EC) to take appropriate measures to verify the interoperability, reliability and safety of RIS. Article 12 requires the EC to monitor the process of implementing RIS in the EU. Article 12 provides the basis for this evaluation, with the following main objective: to prepare and execute an evaluation of the RIS policy for the period 2006-2011. This report provides the EC with information on: • Evaluation of the state of transposition and implementation of the RIS Directive; • Assessment of the coordination of RIS implementation; • Assessment of barriers to and opportunities for further development of RIS. i In order to inform policy making on the further development of RIS, the evaluation provides information on the following evaluation criteria, which are the basis for presenting specific conclusions: 1. The relevance of the RIS objectives in view of the overall transport policy objectives; 2. The state of transposition and implementation of the RIS Directive in the EU Member States; 3. The effectiveness and efficiency of RIS implementation; 4. The impact of RIS on inland waterway transport market development, social conditions and environment; 5. The effectiveness of particular support actions implemented under the relevant national and EU programmes; 6. The coherence and interrelationship between various support programmes and instruments in support of RIS. Regarding the scope of the evaluation the following remarks can be made: • The time period of evaluation is 2006-2011. However, in some cases more recent information is included; • The geographical scope of the evaluation is focused on EU 12+1, i.e. Austria, Belgium, Bulgaria, Czech Republic, Germany, Hungary, France, Luxembourg, the Netherlands, Poland, Romania, Slovak Republic, plus Croatia (which was a candidate country during most of the above-mentioned evaluation period). These countries are the Member States covered by the scope of the RIS Directive. Additional countries, such as Italy, Serbia, Sweden, Switzerland and Ukraine participated in the evaluation as well. In addition, countries outside Europe are considered, including Brazil, China, India and the United States. The data collection process includes in-depth country reviews, for those countries that implemented RIS in Europe. In addition, desk research and targeted interviews are carried out and the evaluator participated in workshops and meetings, e.g. RIS weeks. General conclusions The following are the general conclusions of the evaluator: • RIS has been a major development in the inland waterway industry. In the past years many public and private parties collaborated to define and implement standards and jointly worked towards a roll out the key RIS technologies in all EU 12+1 countries for which the RIS Directive applies. This has helped establish the foundation for more efficient, safe and environmentally friendly transport operations and therefore has contributed to the delivery of overall EU transport policy objectives. • In addition to these aforementioned 12+1 countries, countries such as Serbia, Switzerland, Ukraine, Italy and Sweden, participated in the process, creating a broad geographical coverage. Furthermore, RIS has become a key concept in inland navigation policy making beyond the EU and is now also on the policy agenda in Brazil, China, India, and the United States. • Major progress is achieved in the past years on the implementation of key RIS technologies and RIS services, such as fairway information and traffic information services. At the same time, it can be concluded that elements, such as applications focussing on optimising logistic processes and modal integration, are still missing or not yet functioning. Consequently, the implementation of the RIS Directive is still work in progress. ii This involves both the implementation of legislation, the implementation of technologies and the actual use of RIS technologies and services in practice. The implementation of legislation has well progressed, but is still not complete. The implementation of technologies has progressed considerably but differs per technology and per corridor. Finally, the implementation of RIS services is still far
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Economic Importance of the Belgian Ports : Flemish Maritime Ports, Liège Port Complex and the Port of Brussels – Report 2006
    Economic importance of the Belgian ports : Flemish maritime ports, Liège port complex and the port of Brussels – Report 2006 Working Paper Document by Saskia Vennix June 2008 No 134 Editorial Director Jan Smets, Member of the Board of Directors of the National Bank of Belgium Statement of purpose: The purpose of these working papers is to promote the circulation of research results (Research Series) and analytical studies (Documents Series) made within the National Bank of Belgium or presented by external economists in seminars, conferences and conventions organised by the Bank. The aim is therefore to provide a platform for discussion. The opinions expressed are strictly those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the views of the National Bank of Belgium. Orders For orders and information on subscriptions and reductions: National Bank of Belgium, Documentation - Publications service, boulevard de Berlaimont 14, 1000 Brussels Tel +32 2 221 20 33 - Fax +32 2 21 30 42 The Working Papers are available on the website of the Bank: http://www.nbb.be © National Bank of Belgium, Brussels All rights reserved. Reproduction for educational and non-commercial purposes is permitted provided that the source is acknowledged. ISSN: 1375-680X (print) ISSN: 1784-2476 (online) NBB WORKING PAPER No. 134 - JUNE 2008 Abstract This paper is an annual publication issued by the Microeconomic Analysis service of the National Bank of Belgium. The Flemish maritime ports (Antwerp, Ghent, Ostend, Zeebrugge), the Autonomous Port of Liège and the port of Brussels play a major role in their respective regional economies and in the Belgian economy, not only in terms of industrial activity but also as intermodal centres facilitating the commodity flow.
    [Show full text]
  • 715783 BAT-GREEN SUPPLY CHAINS-IMPLICATIONS and CHALLENGES for RHINE-SCHELDT DELTA SEAPORTS T.Pdf 1 13/08/2019 11:12
    Green Supply Chains Implications and challenges for Rhine-Scheldt Delta Seaports Report prepared for Report prepared by 715783_PDF_Cover_Study_GreenSupplyChains_BAT.indd 1 13/08/2019 10:56 715783_BAT-GREEN SUPPLY CHAINS-IMPLICATIONS AND CHALLENGES FOR RHINE-SCHELDT DELTA SEAPORTS T.pdf 1 13/08/2019 11:12 | Green Supply Chains: implications and challenges for Rhine-Scheldt Delta Seaports | 715783_BAT-GREEN SUPPLY CHAINS-IMPLICATIONS AND CHALLENGES FOR RHINE-SCHELDT DELTA SEAPORTS T.pdf 2 13/08/2019 11:12 | Green Supply Chains: implications and challenges for Rhine-Scheldt Delta Seaports | GREEN SUPPLY CHAINS IMPLICATIONS AND CHALLENGES FOR RHINE-SCHELDT DELTA SEAPORTS FINAL REPORT – 17 JULY 2019 PUBLICATION PREPARED FOR ING Belgium PUBLICATION PREPARED BY Theo Notteboom (University of Antwerp), Larissa van der Lugt (Erasmus UPT), Niels van Saase (Erasmus UPT), Steve Sel (VIL) and Kris Neyens (VIL) 715783_BAT-GREEN SUPPLY CHAINS-IMPLICATIONS AND CHALLENGES FOR RHINE-SCHELDT DELTA SEAPORTS T.pdf 3 13/08/2019 11:12 | Green Supply Chains: implications and challenges for Rhine-Scheldt Delta Seaports | DISCLAIMER The views expressed in this report reflect the personal views of the analysts about the subject of this report. No part of the compensation(s) of the analyst(s) was, is, or will be directly or indirectly related to the inclusion of specific views in this report. This report was prepared on behalf of ING Belgium N.V. (“ING”), solely for the information of its clients. This report is not, nor should it be construed as, an investment advice or an offer or solicitation for the purchase or sale of any financial instrument or product.
    [Show full text]
  • Economic Importance of the Belgian Ports: Flemish Maritime Ports, Liège Port Complex and the Port of Brussels – Report 2012
    A Service of Leibniz-Informationszentrum econstor Wirtschaft Leibniz Information Centre Make Your Publications Visible. zbw for Economics Mathys, Claude Working Paper Economic importance of the Belgian ports: Flemish maritime ports, Liège port complex and the port of Brussels – Report 2012 NBB Working Paper, No. 260 Provided in Cooperation with: National Bank of Belgium, Brussels Suggested Citation: Mathys, Claude (2014) : Economic importance of the Belgian ports: Flemish maritime ports, Liège port complex and the port of Brussels – Report 2012, NBB Working Paper, No. 260, National Bank of Belgium, Brussels This Version is available at: http://hdl.handle.net/10419/144472 Standard-Nutzungsbedingungen: Terms of use: Die Dokumente auf EconStor dürfen zu eigenen wissenschaftlichen Documents in EconStor may be saved and copied for your Zwecken und zum Privatgebrauch gespeichert und kopiert werden. personal and scholarly purposes. Sie dürfen die Dokumente nicht für öffentliche oder kommerzielle You are not to copy documents for public or commercial Zwecke vervielfältigen, öffentlich ausstellen, öffentlich zugänglich purposes, to exhibit the documents publicly, to make them machen, vertreiben oder anderweitig nutzen. publicly available on the internet, or to distribute or otherwise use the documents in public. Sofern die Verfasser die Dokumente unter Open-Content-Lizenzen (insbesondere CC-Lizenzen) zur Verfügung gestellt haben sollten, If the documents have been made available under an Open gelten abweichend von diesen Nutzungsbedingungen die
    [Show full text]
  • The Economic Importance of the Belgian Ports: Flemish Maritime Ports, Liège Port Complex and the Port of Brussels – Report 2016
    A Service of Leibniz-Informationszentrum econstor Wirtschaft Leibniz Information Centre Make Your Publications Visible. zbw for Economics Coppens, François; Mathys, Claude; Merckx, Jean-Pierre; Ringoot, Pascal; Van Kerckhoven, Marc Working Paper The economic importance of the Belgian ports: Flemish maritime ports, Liège port complex and the port of Brussels – Report 2016 NBB Working Paper, No. 342 Provided in Cooperation with: National Bank of Belgium, Brussels Suggested Citation: Coppens, François; Mathys, Claude; Merckx, Jean-Pierre; Ringoot, Pascal; Van Kerckhoven, Marc (2018) : The economic importance of the Belgian ports: Flemish maritime ports, Liège port complex and the port of Brussels – Report 2016, NBB Working Paper, No. 342, National Bank of Belgium, Brussels This Version is available at: http://hdl.handle.net/10419/182219 Standard-Nutzungsbedingungen: Terms of use: Die Dokumente auf EconStor dürfen zu eigenen wissenschaftlichen Documents in EconStor may be saved and copied for your Zwecken und zum Privatgebrauch gespeichert und kopiert werden. personal and scholarly purposes. Sie dürfen die Dokumente nicht für öffentliche oder kommerzielle You are not to copy documents for public or commercial Zwecke vervielfältigen, öffentlich ausstellen, öffentlich zugänglich purposes, to exhibit the documents publicly, to make them machen, vertreiben oder anderweitig nutzen. publicly available on the internet, or to distribute or otherwise use the documents in public. Sofern die Verfasser die Dokumente unter Open-Content-Lizenzen (insbesondere CC-Lizenzen) zur Verfügung gestellt haben sollten, If the documents have been made available under an Open gelten abweichend von diesen Nutzungsbedingungen die in der dort Content Licence (especially Creative Commons Licences), you genannten Lizenz gewährten Nutzungsrechte. may exercise further usage rights as specified in the indicated licence.
    [Show full text]
  • 2 Seas Trade Region – a Great Place to Do Business
    2 Seas Trade Region – A Great Place to do Business The 2 Seas Trade region includes the County of Kent (England), the Provinces of East and West Flanders (Belgium) and the South West of the Netherlands. The region also has close links with Nord-Pas de Calais (France). THE SOUTH WEST OF THE NETHERLANDS Burgh-Haamstede E19 Zierkzee Oosterhout Various routes Zevenbergen Hull-ZeebruggVarious RoutesVarious Routes Oudenbosch London Breda City Airport St. Pancras e Middelburg E19 International Goes Roosendaal Ebbsfleet Thamesport Kent E312 E312 International International Gravesend Sheerness Airport Margate Port of Vlissingen Ebbsfleet Medway Breskens Heathrow Towns Ramsgate Zeebrugge LONDON Ramsgate-Oostend Port of Terneuzen M20 Faversham M25 M26 M2 Discovery Park e Canterbury Enterprise Zone Waasland KENT Sandwich Sint Port Sevenoaks Maidstone Oostende Brugge A34 Niklaas M20 Ashford Ostend-Bruges Eeklo M23 Tunbridge Wells International Ashford Dover International Airport Dover-Dunkirk E40 Gatwick E40 M20 Dover-Calai Dunkerque Ghent A17 Antwerp London Folkestone WEST Ashford Veurne International Airport Airport s Calais A16 FLANDERS Gare de Roeselare Calais- Fréthun E403 EAST Brussels Ramsgate A25 Ypres Kortrijk Airport -Boulogne FLANDERS A19 E17 Boulogne Kortrijk-Wevelgem To Brussels Gare InternationalTourcoin Airporg t -sur-Mer de Lille Roubaix A26 NORD High Speed Rail Service Béthune Lille PAS Lille – Lesquin Airport Main Roads DE CALAIS A16 Motorways Lens Valenciennes Douai Arras A2 Maubeuge A1 Cambrai To Paris The 2 Seas Trade region: A
    [Show full text]
  • Public Financing and Charging Practices of Seaports in the Eu
    PUBLIC FINANCING AND CHARGING PRACTICES OF SEAPORTS IN THE EU Final Bremen, June 2006 Ordered by: EUROPEAN COMMISSION DIRECTORATE-GENERAL FOR ENERGY AND TRANSPORT DIRECTORATE G – Maritime and inland waterway transport; intermodality, Short Sea Shipping, Inland Waterways, and Ports Prepared by: Institute of Shipping Economics and Logistics Universitätsallee GW 1, Block A Prof. Dr. Manfred Zachcial 28359 Bremen Dr. Holger Kramer Germany Dr. Burkhard Lemper Tel.: +49-421-22096-63 Wiebke Duhme Fax: +49-421-22096-77 http://www.isl.org Erasmus University Rotterdam . Vrije Universiteit Brussels MARCONSULT s.r.l., Genoa Napier University Edinburgh; Transport Research Institute Centro de Estudos de Gestao, Lisbon Prof. H. N. Psaraftis , Athens Contents Contents Page Index of Tables XXIV Index of Figures XXXIV 1 Introduction 1 1.1 Explanatory remark 1 1.2 Structure of the report 1 1.3 Background information 1 1.4 Scope of the study 2 1.5 Limitations in the scope of the study 6 1.5.1 Sources of information 6 1.5.2 Problem of confidentiality 7 1.5.3 Aspects from the port sector related to the scope of the study 7 2 Country reports for WP I and WP II 10 2.1 Italy 10 2.1.1 Task 1.A: Identification of system for public financing of seaports in Italy 10 2.1.1.1 The institutional set-up of ports established by the 1994 reform 10 2.1.1.2 The classification of ports and the basic rules on financing port infrastructure 12 2.1.1.3 The powers of the regions in port matters 13 PUBLIC FINANCING AND CHARGING PRACTICES OF SEAPORTS IN THE EU I Contents 2.1.2 The
    [Show full text]
  • The Ports of Flanders KEY FACTS & FIGURES BERLIN the Ports of Flanders
    The Ports of Flanders KEY FACTS & FIGURES BERLIN The Ports of Flanders ROTTERDAM Key figures 283MILLION TONNES GOODS TURNOVERNORDRHEIN 2016 WESTFALEN ALL 4 FLEMISH PORTS DESTINATIONS WORLDWIDE Antwerp Zeebrugge TEN-T More than 500 LONDON Core network COVERED WAREHOUSES mil. mil. 214 38 SEAGOING VESSELS 600 hectares PORT OF 29,237 ZEEBRUGGE Ghent Ostend MOTIVATED EMPLOYEES CONSUMERS WITHIN PORT OF PORT OF RUHR AREA A 500 KM RANGE 226,427 Ostend ANTWERP mil. mil. 29 1,5 More than PORT SURFACES 100 million 20,000 hectares PORT OF GHENT CONTAINER THROUGHPUT INVESTMENTS 11,4 million TEU € 4,0 billion € 11 million / a day BRUSSELS PARIS 2 The Ports of Flanders The Ports of Flanders 3 Facts 4 Flemish ports. Different in size, location and Port of specialization. Zeebrugge Deep draught coastal port: 38 million tonnes goods turnover • Deepsea container port, with frequent connections to Asia Port of • Shortsea: important roll-on roll-off destinations in Europe (Great Britain, Iberian Antwerp peninsula, Scandinavia and Baltic) Port of • Number 1 car handling port in the world Largest mainport of Flanders, Ostend second port in Europe: • Important hub for liquefied natural gas (lng) 214 million tonnes maritime • Important forrest products distribution Small coastal port: goods turnover centre 1.5 million tonnes goods turnover • Cruise port • Deepsea container hub, market leader on 5 • Service port for the offshore wind business. • Accessible at any time for the largest out of 6 sailing areas Specialized port for the construction and container ships
    [Show full text]
  • Notices to Mariners No
    Vlaanderen is maritiem Notices to Mariners No. 01 07 JANUARY 2021 NOTICES: 001-078 www.flemishhydrography.be Positions are given in the reference system World Geodetic System 84 (WGS84). Incorrect interpretation of the reference system can lead to errors in the position of several hundred of metres. Depths (in metres): are reduced to Lowest Astronomical Tide (LAT) for tidal areas and to local dock datum for non-tidal areas. Heights (in metres): drying heights are above LAT. Vertical clearance is above Mean High Water Spring (MHWS). Other heights are above Mean Sea Level (MSL). Heights for non-tidal areas are above local dock datum. Directions, bearings, leading lines and light sectors (in degrees) are true reckoned from seawards. NOTICES TO MARINERS No. 01 07 JANUARY 2021 Notices: 001-078 This is a free translation of the official “Berichten aan Zeevarenden, nr. 01 jaargang 2021” In case of dispute the Dutch text is the only valid copy. www.flemishhydrography.be Contents 1/1 NOTICES TO MARINERS 5 1/2 REGULATIONS 6 1/3 OFFICIAL RADIO MESSAGES INTENDED FOR BELGIAN MERCHANT VESSELS: THE BELMAR SYSTEM 7 1/4 BELGIAN COAST STATION OSTEND RADIO - CALLSIGN : OSU - FREQUENCIES, BROADCASTS AND LISTENING OUT 10 1/5 ISPS REGULATIONS 12 1/6 INTERNATIONAL SANITARY REGULATIONS 14 1/7 NAVAL COOPERATION AND GUIDANCE FOR SHIPPING (NCAGS) 15 1/8 RADIO NAVIGATION MESSAGES 19 1/9 RIVER INFORMATION SERVICES 19 1/10 COASTAL-WEATHER-FORECAST 19 1/11 WEATHER FORECASTS AND ANNOUNCEMENTS OF STORMY WEATHER AND GALE FORCE WINDS 20 1/12 GNB MANAGEMENT AREA: PROCEDURE
    [Show full text]
  • Belgian Maritimesingle Window
    BELGIAN MARITIMESINGLE WINDOW XXXXX // 1 FOREWORD CONTENT EXECUTIVESUMMARY Reporting Formalities Directive and MSW Architecture The objective of Directive 2010/65/EU, also called Reporting For the implementation of the Belgian MSW, a pragmatic Formalities Directive (RFD) or previously FAL Directive, is approach has been followed. Instead of implementing a to simplify and harmonize the administrative procedures completely new system, we use existing systems such as the for ships arriving in and departing from EU ports. The RFD Port Community Systems (PCS), the Central Broker System, requires that the European member states implement a the Federal Service Bus and the Belgian node of SafeSeaNet Maritime Single Window (MSW). In the pre-MSW situation, and adapt these systems to comply with the RFD. in order to fulfil its duties, an authorised person submits information to authorities, however part of the information System Requirements Specification is the same for several authorities. Moreover, the reporting formalities are not harmonised between the member This brochure is based on a more detailed description of states and a substantial part of the information is still sent the requirements for the Belgian MSW, the “SRS”. The in paper format. By setting up an MSW, a reporting party System Requirements Specification defines what should will have to submit information only once and, in order to be done, not how the requirements should be technically Document history enable information sharing between competent authorities, implemented, the latter being the sole responsibility of Version 0.29 information should be transmitted electronically. The MSW the owners of the systems. The SRS itself is based among Date March 31, 2016 Subject Version of the MSW brochure based on System Requirement Specification is the place where all information is reported once and others on international, European and national legislation version 0.29 further distributed in electronic format to all authorities.
    [Show full text]
  • The Downfall of the Port of Ostend in the 20Th Century: Causes and Consequences
    MASTER OF SCIENCE IN MARITIME SCIENCE MASTER DISSERTATION Academic year 2018 – 2019 The downfall of the port of Ostend in the 20th century: causes and consequences Maxime Brackeniers Number of words: 28,268 Submitted in partial fulfilment of the requirements Supervisor: Professor. dr. Frank Maes for the degree of: Master of Science in Maritime Science Assessor: Klaas Willaert Deze pagina is niet beschikbaar omdat ze persoonsgegevens bevat. Universiteitsbibliotheek Gent, 2021. This page is not available because it contains personal information. Ghent Universit , Librar , 2021. Acknowledgments In this preface I would like to thank everyone who helped me making this master dissertation possible. First of all I would like to acknowledge Prof. dr. Frank Maes for his guidance and advice throughout the writing of this master dissertation. Secondly, I would also like to thank Prof. dr. Christian Koninckx and Prof. dr. emeritus. Georges Allaert for their time and helpful advice. Thirdly, I would like to thank my family and friends for the support and guidance throughout the writing of this master dissertation. ii Table of content Permission ................................................................................................................ i Acknowledgments ................................................................................................... ii Introduction .............................................................................................................. v Glossary of abbreviations .....................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Working Paper Document
    The economic importance of the Belgian ports : Flemish maritime ports, Liège port complex and the port of Brussels – Report 2016 Working Paper Document by François Coppens, Claude Mathys, Jean-Pierre Merckx, Pascal Ringoot and Marc Van Kerckhoven April 2018 No 342 Editor Jan Smets, Governor of the National Bank of Belgium Statement of purpose: The purpose of these working papers is to promote the circulation of research results (Research Series) and analytical studies (Documents Series) made within the National Bank of Belgium or presented by external economists in seminars, conferences and conventions organised by the Bank. The aim is therefore to provide a platform for discussion. The opinions expressed are strictly those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the views of the National Bank of Belgium. Orders For orders and information on subscriptions and reductions: National Bank of Belgium, Documentation - Publications service, boulevard de Berlaimont 14, 1000 Brussels Tel +32 2 221 20 33 - Fax +32 2 21 30 42 The Working Papers are available on the website of the Bank: http://www.nbb.be © National Bank of Belgium, Brussels All rights reserved. Reproduction for educational and non-commercial purposes is permitted provided that the source is acknowledged. ISSN: 1375-680X (print) ISSN: 1784-2476 (online) NBB WORKING PAPER No. 342 – APRIL 2018 Foreword Compiling the statistical series on the Belgian ports is not only a complex task, it is also particularly time-consuming. Moreover, publication depends on the submission of the annual accounts. In the past, it was therefore not possible to give the figures for year t-2 until May or June at the earliest.
    [Show full text]
  • Something Is Moving at Sea…
    Something is moving at sea… A marine spatial plan for the Belgian part of the North Sea 82 A sea of busyness .........................................................................................................................................................................3 A marine spatial plan? ...........................................................................................................................................................4 Nature conservation ..................................................................................................................................................................6 INHOUD Energy, cables and pipelines .........................................................................................................................................8 Shipping, ports and dredging ...................................................................................................................................10 Fisheries and aquaculture .............................................................................................................................................12 Sand and gravel exploitation ....................................................................................................................................14 Coastal protection ....................................................................................................................................................................14 Military use .......................................................................................................................................................................................16
    [Show full text]