DOCSLIB.ORG

Redacted for Privacy Abstract Approved Lalph E

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Redacted for Privacy Abstract Approved Lalph E AN ABSTRACT OF THE DISSERTATION OF Christine Andrea Armer for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy in Entomology presented on August 28, 2002. Title: Entornopathogenic Nematodes for Biological Control of the Colorado Potato Beetle, Leptinotarsa decemlineata (Say) Redacted for privacy Abstract approved lalph E. Berry Suj7aRzto The Colorado potato beetle (CPB), Leptinotarsa decemlineata (Say), is the most devastating foliage-feeding pest of potatoes in the United States. Potential biological control agents include the nematodes Heterorhabditis marelatus Liu & Berry and Steinernema riobrave Cabanillas, Poinar & Raulston, which provided nearly 100% CPB control in previous laboratory trials, In the present study, laboratory assays tested survival and infection by the two species under the soil temperatures CPB are exposed to, from 4-37°C. H. marelatus survived from 4-31°C, and S. riobrave from 4-37°C. Both species infected and developed in waxworm hosts from 13-31°C, but H. marelatus rarely infected hosts above 25°C, and S. riobrave rarely infected hosts below 19°C. H. marelatus infected an average of 5.8% of hosts from 13- 31°C, whereas S. riobrave infected 1.4%. Although H. marelatus could not survive at temperatures as high as S. riobrave, H. marelatus infected more hosts so is preferable for use in CPB control. Heterorhabditis marelatus rarely reproduced in CPB. Preliminary laboratory trials suggested the addition of nitrogen to CPB host plants improved nematode reproduction. Field studies testing nitrogen fertilizer effects on nematode reproduction in CPB indicated that increasing nitrogen from 226 kg/ha to 678 kg/ha produced 25% higher foliar levels of the alkaloids solanine and chacomne. However, the increased alkaloids did not affect nematode infection of, nor reproduction in, CPB prepupae. Nematodes applied to field plot soil at 50 infectivejuveniles/cm2reduced adult CPB by 50%, and increased numbers of dead prepupae in soil samples up to five times more than in non-nematode plots. Laboratory studies of H. marelatus and its symbiotic bacteria in CPB hemolymph indicated that immune responses did not limit nematode reproduction. A 58kD CPB hemolymph protein apparently caused the symbiotic bacteria to switch to the secondary form, which does not produce antibiotics and enzymes necessary for nematode growth and reproduction. Despite heat denaturation of the protein, the nematodes did not reproduce unless lipids were added to the hemolymph. Therefore, while H. marelatus may provide high levels of CPB control, nutritional constraints on the nematode and its bacteria inhibit reproduction in CPB and limit long-term multi-generation control. ©Copyright by Christine Andrea Armer August 28, 2002 All Rights Reserved Entomopathogemc Nematodes for Biological Control of the Colorado Potato Beetle, Leptinotarsa decemlineata(Say) by Christine Andrea Armer A DISSERTATION submitted to Oregon State University in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy Presented August 28, 2002 Commencement June 2003 Doctor of Philosophy dissertation of Christine Andrea Armer presented on August 28, 2002. Redacted for privacy or Redacted for privacy Co-Majo Prot'essor, representing Entomology Redacted for privacy of Redacted for privacy Dean of tYi aduate School I understand that my dissertation will become part of the permanent collection of Oregon State University libraries. My signature below authorizes release of my dissertation to any reader upon request. Redacted for privacy Christine Andrea Armer, Author ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS I would like to thank my parents for putting my education foremost, and always encouraging me and assisting me in choosing my way in the world. My husband, David Putzolu, has provided endless love and support through the research process. His patience and willingness to help have been invaluable, and his intelligence, logic, and understanding of human behavior have been an inspiration. No woman is an island, and I could not have completed this work without discussions that sparked new ideas and provided necessary information with students and faculty at OSU, as well as in other entomology departments around the country. Many thanks to all my friends (ayyyyyy!) at OSU and elsewhere who have provided interesting discussions, ideas, sympathy, understanding, and love. Innumerable thanks too to my committee members who provided support, knowledge, and friendship: Russell Ingham, Marcos Kogan, Alison Moldenke, Mary Powelson, and Gary Reed, and especially advisors Ralph Berry and Sujaya Rao. Funding was provided by EPA-STAR Graduate Fellowship #U9 15727, an Applied Insect Ecologists' Foundation Graduate Fellowship, a National Potato Council Auxiliary Graduate Scholarship, an Agriculture Research Foundation Grant from Oregon State University, and a Yerex Graduate Fellowship. As important as the funding to conduct the research was the support of knowing others believed in the value of my research. CONTRIBUTION OF AUTHORS Dr. Gary Reed provided vital guidance for field plot set-up, maintenance, and data collection for the field study presented in Chapter 3. He presented background information on agronomic techniques, grower concerns, and costs involved in agribusiness. He also provided valuable discussions throughout the sampling process and offered ideas on new topics to study. Sarina Jepsen assisted with data collection and helped develop field monitoring techniques for Chapter 3. Conversations with her, based on her questions and ideas, helped clarify the direction and goals of the field study. TABLE OF CONTENTS Page CHAPTER 1: INTRODUCTION..................................................... 1 COLORADO POTATO BEETLE (CPB): ECONOMIC IMPORTANCE 1 CPB BASIC BIOLOGY AND BIOGEOGRAPHY............................. 1 CPB HOST PLANTS................................................................. 3 CPB RESISTANCE TO TOXINS................................................. 6 PLANT BREEDING FOR RESISTANCE TO CPB........................... 7 CPB CHEMICAL CONTROL..................................................... 10 CPB CONTROL BY PREDATORS, PARASITES, AND PATHOGENS 11 CPB CONTROL BY ENTOMOPATHOGENIC NEMATODES............. 12 ENTOMOPATHOGENTC NEMATODE LIFE CYCLE....................... 12 INSECT HOST RESISTANCE TO ENTOMOPATHOGENIC NEMATODES...................................................................... 15 SEQUESTRATION OF HOST-PLANT CHEMICALS........................ 17 RESEARCH OBJECTIVES........................................................ 18 REFERENCES........................................................................ 22 CHAPTER 2: LONGEVITY AND INFECTIVITY OF ENTOMOPATHOGENIC NEMATODES AT TEMPERATURE EXTREMES............................................................................ 33 ABSTRACT........................................................................... 33 INTRODUCTION................................................................... 35 MATERIALS AND METHODS.................................................. 37 TABLE OF CONTENTS (CONT1MJED) Page RESULTS.............................................................................. 44 DISCUSSION........................................................................ 51 ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS........................................................ 57 REFERENCES........................................................................ 58 CHAPTER 3: FIELD EFFICACY OF THE ENTOMOPATHOGENIC NEMATODE HETERORJIABDJTJS MARELA TUS LJU & BERRY FOR COLORADO POTATO BEETLE CONTROL....................................60 ABSTRACT.......................................................................... 60 INTRODUCTION................................................................... 62 MATERIALS AND METHODS.................................................. 65 RESULTS............................................................................. 74 DISCUSSION........................................................................ 81 ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS........................................................ 88 REFERENCES....................................................................... 88 CHAPTER 4: ANTI-PATHOGENIC DEFENSES IN COLORADO POTATO BEETLE }IEMOLYMPH................................................ 92 ABSTRACT...........................................................................92 INTRODUCTION................................................................... 94 MATERIALS AND METHODS.................................................. 97 RESULTS.............................................................................109 TABLE OF CONTENTS (CONTINUED) Page DISCUSSION........................................................................121 ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS.........................................................129 REFERENCES.......................................................................129 CHAPTER 5: CONCLUSIONS.......................................................133 BIBLIOGRAPHY........................................................................ 140 LIST OF FIGURES Figure 2.1. Four-year (1998-200 1, inclusive) average maximum and minimum soil temperatures at a depth of 7.5 cm in unirrigated soil......................... 38 2.2. Average Heterorhabditis marelatus infective period vs. percent of waxworms infected, as mediated by temperature..............................48 2.3. Length of Steinernema riobrave infective period compared to percent of waxworms infected over a broad range of temperatures...................... 49
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Spiroplasma Infection Among Ixodid Ticks Exhibits Species Dependence and Suggests a Vertical Pattern of Transmission
    microorganisms Article Spiroplasma Infection among Ixodid Ticks Exhibits Species Dependence and Suggests a Vertical Pattern of Transmission Shohei Ogata 1, Wessam Mohamed Ahmed Mohamed 1 , Kodai Kusakisako 1,2, May June Thu 1,†, Yongjin Qiu 3 , Mohamed Abdallah Mohamed Moustafa 1,4 , Keita Matsuno 5,6 , Ken Katakura 1, Nariaki Nonaka 1 and Ryo Nakao 1,* 1 Laboratory of Parasitology, Department of Disease Control, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, Graduate School of Infectious Diseases, Hokkaido University, N 18 W 9, Kita-ku, Sapporo 060-0818, Japan; [email protected] (S.O.); [email protected] (W.M.A.M.); [email protected] (K.K.); [email protected] (M.J.T.); [email protected] (M.A.M.M.); [email protected] (K.K.); [email protected] (N.N.) 2 Laboratory of Veterinary Parasitology, School of Veterinary Medicine, Kitasato University, Towada, Aomori 034-8628, Japan 3 Hokudai Center for Zoonosis Control in Zambia, School of Veterinary Medicine, The University of Zambia, P.O. Box 32379, Lusaka 10101, Zambia; [email protected] 4 Department of Animal Medicine, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, South Valley University, Qena 83523, Egypt 5 Unit of Risk Analysis and Management, Research Center for Zoonosis Control, Hokkaido University, N 20 W 10, Kita-ku, Sapporo 001-0020, Japan; [email protected] 6 International Collaboration Unit, Research Center for Zoonosis Control, Hokkaido University, N 20 W 10, Kita-ku, Sapporo 001-0020, Japan Citation: Ogata, S.; Mohamed, * Correspondence: [email protected]; Tel.: +81-11-706-5196 W.M.A.; Kusakisako, K.; Thu, M.J.; † Present address: Food Control Section, Department of Food and Drug Administration, Ministry of Health and Sports, Zabu Thiri, Nay Pyi Taw 15011, Myanmar.
    [Show full text]
  • Tachinid (Diptera: Tachinidae) Parasitoid Diversity and Temporal Abundance at a Single Site in the Northeastern United States Author(S): Diego J
    Tachinid (Diptera: Tachinidae) Parasitoid Diversity and Temporal Abundance at a Single Site in the Northeastern United States Author(s): Diego J. Inclan and John O. Stireman, III Source: Annals of the Entomological Society of America, 104(2):287-296. Published By: Entomological Society of America https://doi.org/10.1603/AN10047 URL: http://www.bioone.org/doi/full/10.1603/AN10047 BioOne (www.bioone.org) is a nonprofit, online aggregation of core research in the biological, ecological, and environmental sciences. BioOne provides a sustainable online platform for over 170 journals and books published by nonprofit societies, associations, museums, institutions, and presses. Your use of this PDF, the BioOne Web site, and all posted and associated content indicates your acceptance of BioOne’s Terms of Use, available at www.bioone.org/page/terms_of_use. Usage of BioOne content is strictly limited to personal, educational, and non-commercial use. Commercial inquiries or rights and permissions requests should be directed to the individual publisher as copyright holder. BioOne sees sustainable scholarly publishing as an inherently collaborative enterprise connecting authors, nonprofit publishers, academic institutions, research libraries, and research funders in the common goal of maximizing access to critical research. CONSERVATION BIOLOGY AND BIODIVERSITY Tachinid (Diptera: Tachinidae) Parasitoid Diversity and Temporal Abundance at a Single Site in the Northeastern United States 1 DIEGO J. INCLAN AND JOHN O. STIREMAN, III Department of Biological Sciences, 3640 Colonel Glenn Highway, 235A, BH, Wright State University, Dayton, OH 45435 Ann. Entomol. Soc. Am. 104(2): 287Ð296 (2011); DOI: 10.1603/AN10047 ABSTRACT Although tachinids are one of the most diverse families of Diptera and represent the largest group of nonhymenopteran parasitoids, their local diversity and distribution patterns of most species in the family are poorly known.
    [Show full text]
  • Tachinidae, Tachinid Flies
    Beneficial Insects Class Insecta, Insects Order Diptera, Flies, gnats, and midges Diptera means “two wings,” and true flies bear only one pair of functional wings. Flies are one of the largest insect groups, with approximately 35 families that contain predatory or parasitic species. All flies have piercing/sucking/sponging mouthparts. Tachinid flies Family Tachinidae Description and life history: This is a large and important family, with up to 1300 native parasitoid species in North America and additional introduced species to help control foreign pests. These flies vary in color, size, and shape but most resemble houseflies. Adults are usually gray, black, or striped, and hairy. Adults lay eggs on plants to be consumed by hosts, or they glue eggs to the outside of hosts, so the maggots can burrow into the host. Rarely will tachinids insert eggs into host bodies. Tachinid flies develop rapidly within their host and pupate in 4–14 days. By the time they emerge, they have killed their host. Many species have several generations a year, although some are limited by hosts with a single annual generation. Prey species: Most tachinid flies attack caterpillars and adult and larval beetles, although others specialize on Tachinid fly adult. (327) sawfly larvae, true bugs, grasshoppers, or other insects. Photo: John Davidson Lydella thompsoni is a parasitoid of European corn borer, Voria ruralis attacks cabbage looper caterpillars, Myiopharus doryphorae attacks Colorado potato beetle larvae, and Istocheta aldrichi parasitizes adult Japanese beetles. Although these are very important natural en- emies, none is available commercially. IPM of Midwest Landscapes 263.
    [Show full text]
  • Genetics and Physiology of Motility by Photorhabdus Spp Brandye A
    University of New Hampshire University of New Hampshire Scholars' Repository Doctoral Dissertations Student Scholarship Spring 2006 Genetics and physiology of motility by Photorhabdus spp Brandye A. Michaels University of New Hampshire, Durham Follow this and additional works at: https://scholars.unh.edu/dissertation Recommended Citation Michaels, Brandye A., "Genetics and physiology of motility by Photorhabdus spp" (2006). Doctoral Dissertations. 324. https://scholars.unh.edu/dissertation/324 This Dissertation is brought to you for free and open access by the Student Scholarship at University of New Hampshire Scholars' Repository. It has been accepted for inclusion in Doctoral Dissertations by an authorized administrator of University of New Hampshire Scholars' Repository. For more information, please contact [email protected]. GENETICS AND PHYSIOLOGY OF MOTILITY BYPHOTORHABDUS SPP. BY BRANDYE A. MICHAELS BS, Armstrong Atlantic State University, 1999 DISSERTATION Submitted to the University of New Hampshire in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree of Doctor of Philosophy in Microbiology May, 2006 Reproduced with permission of the copyright owner. Further reproduction prohibited without permission. UMI Number: 3217433 INFORMATION TO USERS The quality of this reproduction is dependent upon the quality of the copy submitted. Broken or indistinct print, colored or poor quality illustrations and photographs, print bleed-through, substandard margins, and improper alignment can adversely affect reproduction. In the unlikely event that the author did not send a complete manuscript and there are missing pages, these will be noted. Also, if unauthorized copyright material had to be removed, a note will indicate the deletion. ® UMI UMI Microform 3217433 Copyright 2006 by ProQuest Information and Learning Company.
    [Show full text]
  • Evolutionary Patchwork of an Insecticidal Toxin
    Ruffner et al. BMC Genomics (2015) 16:609 DOI 10.1186/s12864-015-1763-2 RESEARCH ARTICLE Open Access Evolutionary patchwork of an insecticidal toxin shared between plant-associated pseudomonads and the insect pathogens Photorhabdus and Xenorhabdus Beat Ruffner1, Maria Péchy-Tarr2, Monica Höfte3, Guido Bloemberg4, Jürg Grunder5, Christoph Keel2* and Monika Maurhofer1* Abstract Background: Root-colonizing fluorescent pseudomonads are known for their excellent abilities to protect plants against soil-borne fungal pathogens. Some of these bacteria produce an insecticidal toxin (Fit) suggesting that they may exploit insect hosts as a secondary niche. However, the ecological relevance of insect toxicity and the mechanisms driving the evolution of toxin production remain puzzling. Results: Screening a large collection of plant-associated pseudomonads for insecticidal activity and presence of the Fit toxin revealed that Fit is highly indicative of insecticidal activity and predicts that Pseudomonas protegens and P. chlororaphis are exclusive Fit producers. A comparative evolutionary analysis of Fit toxin-producing Pseudomonas including the insect-pathogenic bacteria Photorhabdus and Xenorhadus, which produce the Fit related Mcf toxin, showed that fit genes are part of a dynamic genomic region with substantial presence/absence polymorphism and local variation in GC base composition. The patchy distribution and phylogenetic incongruence of fit genes indicate that the Fit cluster evolved via horizontal transfer, followed by functional integration of vertically transmitted genes, generating a unique Pseudomonas-specific insect toxin cluster. Conclusions: Our findings suggest that multiple independent evolutionary events led to formation of at least three versions of the Mcf/Fit toxin highlighting the dynamic nature of insect toxin evolution.
    [Show full text]
  • Phylogenetic Relationships of Tachinid Flies in Subfamily Exoristinae Tachinidae: Diptera) Based on 28S Rdna and Elongation Factor-1A
    Systematic Entomology *2002) 27,409±435 Phylogenetic relationships of tachinid flies in subfamily Exoristinae Tachinidae: Diptera) based on 28S rDNA and elongation factor-1a JOHN O. STIREMAN III Department of Ecology and Evolutionary Biology,University of Arizona,Tucson,U.S.A. Abstract. The phylogenetic relationships within the largest subfamily of Tachi- nidae,Exoristinae,were explored using nucleotide sequences of two genes *EF-1 a and 28S rDNA). A total of fifty-five and forty-three taxa were represented in the analyses for each gene,respectively,representing forty-three genera. Neighbour joining,parsimony and maximum likelihood inference methods were employed to reconstruct phylogenetic relationships in separate analyses of each gene,and parsimony was used to analyse the combined dataset. Although certain taxa were highly mobile,phylogenetic reconstructions generally supported recent clas- sification schemes based on reproductive habits and genitalia. Generally,the monophyly of Tachinidae and Exoristinae was supported. Tribes Winthemiini, Exoristini and Blondeliini were repeatedly constructed as monophyletic groups, with the former two clades often occupying a basal position among Exoristinae. Goniini and Eryciini generally clustered together as a derived clade within Exoristinae; however,they were never reconstructed as two distinct clades. These results suggest that the possession of unembryonated eggs is plesiomorphic within the subfamily and that there may have been multiple transitions between micro- type and macrotype egg forms. Introduction 1987; Williams et al.,1990; Eggleton & Belshaw,1993), and the wide variety of mechanisms by which they attack Tachinidae is generally regarded as a relatively recent, them *O'Hara,1985). These oviposition strategies include actively radiating clade of parasitic flies *Crosskey,1976).
    [Show full text]
  • The Louse Fly-Arsenophonus Arthropodicus Association
    THE LOUSE FLY-ARSENOPHONUS ARTHROPODICUS ASSOCIATION: DEVELOPMENT OF A NEW MODEL SYSTEM FOR THE STUDY OF INSECT-BACTERIAL ENDOSYMBIOSES by Kari Lyn Smith A dissertation submitted to the faculty of The University of Utah in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy Department of Biology The University of Utah August 2012 Copyright © Kari Lyn Smith 2012 All Rights Reserved The University of Utah Graduate School STATEMENT OF DISSERTATION APPROVAL The dissertation of Kari Lyn Smith has been approved by the following supervisory committee members: Colin Dale Chair June 18, 2012 Date Approved Dale Clayton Member June 18, 2012 Date Approved Maria-Denise Dearing Member June 18, 2012 Date Approved Jon Seger Member June 18, 2012 Date Approved Robert Weiss Member June 18, 2012 Date Approved and by Neil Vickers Chair of the Department of __________________________Biology and by Charles A. Wight, Dean of The Graduate School. ABSTRACT There are many bacteria that associate with insects in a mutualistic manner and offer their hosts distinct fitness advantages, and thus have likely played an important role in shaping the ecology and evolution of insects. Therefore, there is much interest in understanding how these relationships are initiated and maintained and the molecular mechanisms involved in this process, as well as interest in developing symbionts as platforms for paratransgenesis to combat disease transmission by insect hosts. However, this research has been hampered by having only a limited number of systems to work with, due to the difficulties in isolating and modifying bacterial symbionts in the lab. In this dissertation, I present my work in developing a recently described insect-bacterial symbiosis, that of the louse fly, Pseudolynchia canariensis, and its bacterial symbiont, Candidatus Arsenophonus arthropodicus, into a new model system with which to investigate the mechanisms and evolution of symbiosis.
    [Show full text]
  • No Slide Title
    Tachinidae: The “other” parasitoids Diego Inclán University of Padova Outline • Briefly (re-) introduce parasitoids & the parasitoid lifestyle • Quick survey of dipteran parasitoids • Introduce you to tachinid flies • major groups • oviposition strategies • host associations • host range… • Discuss role of tachinids in biological control Parasite vs. parasitoid Parasite Life cycle of a parasitoid Alien (1979) Life cycle of a parasitoid Parasite vs. parasitoid Parasite Parasitoid does not kill the host kill its host Insects life cycles Life cycle of a parasitoid Some facts about parasitoids • Parasitoids are diverse (15-25% of all insect species) • Hosts of parasitoids = virtually all terrestrial insects • Parasitoids are among the dominant natural enemies of phytophagous insects (e.g., crop pests) • Offer model systems for understanding community structure, coevolution & evolutionary diversification Distribution/frequency of parasitoids among insect orders Primary groups of parasitoids Diptera (flies) ca. 20% of parasitoids Hymenoptera (wasps) ca. 70% of parasitoids Described Family Primary hosts Diptera parasitoid sp Sciomyzidae 200? Gastropods: (snails/slugs) Nemestrinidae 300 Orth.: Acrididae Bombyliidae 5000 primarily Hym., Col., Dip. Pipunculidae 1000 Hom.:Auchenorrycha Conopidae 800 Hym:Aculeata Lep., Orth., Hom., Col., Sarcophagidae 1250? Gastropoda + others Lep., Hym., Col., Hem., Tachinidae > 8500 Dip., + many others Pyrgotidae 350 Col:Scarabaeidae Acroceridae 500 Arach.:Aranea Hym., Dip., Col., Lep., Phoridae 400?? Isop.,Diplopoda
    [Show full text]
  • Comparison of Xenorhabdus Bovienii Bacterial Strain Genomes Reveals Diversity in Symbiotic Functions Kristen E
    Murfin et al. BMC Genomics (2015) 16:889 DOI 10.1186/s12864-015-2000-8 RESEARCH ARTICLE Open Access Comparison of Xenorhabdus bovienii bacterial strain genomes reveals diversity in symbiotic functions Kristen E. Murfin1, Amy C. Whooley1, Jonathan L. Klassen2 and Heidi Goodrich-Blair1* Abstract Background: Xenorhabdus bacteria engage in a beneficial symbiosis with Steinernema nematodes, in part by providing activities that help kill and degrade insect hosts for nutrition. Xenorhabdus strains (members of a single species) can display wide variation in host-interaction phenotypes and genetic potential indicating that strains may differ in their encoded symbiosis factors, including secreted metabolites. Methods: To discern strain-level variation among symbiosis factors, and facilitate the identification of novel compounds, we performed a comparative analysis of the genomes of 10 Xenorhabdus bovienii bacterial strains. Results: The analyzed X. bovienii draft genomes are broadly similar in structure (e.g. size, GC content, number of coding sequences). Genome content analysis revealed that general classes of putative host-microbe interaction functions, such as secretion systems and toxin classes, were identified in all bacterial strains. In contrast, we observed diversity of individual genes within families (e.g. non-ribosomal peptide synthetase clusters and insecticidal toxin components), indicating the specific molecules secreted by each strain can vary. Additionally, phenotypic analysis indicates that regulation of activities (e.g. enzymes and motility) differs among strains. Conclusions: The analyses presented here demonstrate that while general mechanisms by which X. bovienii bacterial strains interact with their invertebrate hosts are similar, the specific molecules mediating these interactions differ. Our data support that adaptation of individual bacterial strains to distinct hosts or niches has occurred.
    [Show full text]
  • Assessing the Pathogenicity of Two Bacteria Isolated from the Entomopathogenic Nematode Heterorhabditis Indica Against Galleria Mellonella and Some Pest Insects
    insects Article Assessing the Pathogenicity of Two Bacteria Isolated from the Entomopathogenic Nematode Heterorhabditis indica against Galleria mellonella and Some Pest Insects Rosalba Salgado-Morales 1,2 , Fernando Martínez-Ocampo 2 , Verónica Obregón-Barboza 2, Kathia Vilchis-Martínez 3, Alfredo Jiménez-Pérez 3 and Edgar Dantán-González 2,* 1 Doctorado en Ciencias, Instituto de Investigación en Ciencias Básicas y Aplicadas, Universidad Autónoma del Estado de Morelos, Av. Universidad 1001, Chamilpa, 62209 Cuernavaca, Morelos, Mexico; [email protected] 2 Laboratorio de Estudios Ecogenómicos, Centro de Investigación en Biotecnología, Universidad Autónoma del Estado de Morelos, Av. Universidad 1001, Chamilpa, 62209 Cuernavaca, Morelos, Mexico; [email protected] (F.M.-O.); [email protected] (V.O.-B.) 3 Centro de Desarrollo de Productos Bióticos, Instituto Politécnico Nacional, Calle Ceprobi No. 8, San Isidro, Yautepec, 62739 Morelos, Mexico; [email protected] (K.V.-M.); [email protected] (A.J.-P.) * Correspondence: [email protected]; Tel.: +52-777-329-7000 Received: 20 December 2018; Accepted: 15 March 2019; Published: 26 March 2019 Abstract: The entomopathogenic nematodes Heterorhabditis are parasites of insects and are associated with mutualist symbiosis enterobacteria of the genus Photorhabdus; these bacteria are lethal to their host insects. Heterorhabditis indica MOR03 was isolated from sugarcane soil in Morelos state, Mexico. The molecular identification of the nematode was confirmed using sequences of the ITS1-5.8S-ITS2 region and the D2/D3 expansion segment of the 28S rRNA gene. In addition, two bacteria HIM3 and NA04 strains were isolated from the entomopathogenic nematode. The genomes of both bacteria were sequenced and assembled de novo.
    [Show full text]
  • Haemocoel Injection of Pira1b1 to Galleria Mellonella Larvae Leads To
    www.nature.com/scientificreports OPEN Haemocoel injection of PirA1B1 to Galleria mellonella larvae leads to disruption of the haemocyte Received: 05 July 2016 Accepted: 22 September 2016 immune functions Published: 13 October 2016 Gongqing Wu1,2 & Yunhong Yi1 The bacterium Photorhabdus luminescens produces a number of insecticidal proteins to kill its larval prey. In this study, we cloned the gene coding for a binary toxin PirA1B1 and purified the recombinant protein using affinity chromatography combined with desalination technology. Furthermore, the cytotoxicity of the recombinant protein against the haemocytes of Galleria mellonella larvae was investigated. We found that the protein had haemocoel insecticidal activity against G. mellonella with an LD50 of 131.5 ng/larva. Intrahaemocoelic injection of PirA1B1 into G. mellonella resulted in significant decreases in haemocyte number and phagocytic ability. In in vitro experiments, PirA1B1 inhibited the spreading behaviour of the haemocytes of G. mellonella larvae and even caused haemocyte degeneration. Fluorescence microscope analysis and visualization of haemocyte F-actin stained with phalloidin-FITC showed that the PirA1B1 toxin disrupted the organization of the haemocyte cytoskeleton. Our results demonstrated that the PirA1B1 toxin disarmed the insect cellular immune system. Photorhabdus luminescens, a Gram-negative bacterium, resides as a symbiont in the gut of entomopathogenic nematodes (EPNs) of the genus Heterorhabditis1. Upon entering an insect host, EPNs release the symbiotic bacte- ria directly into the insect haemocoel. To infect its host and survive, bacteria must be capable of producing a wide range of proteins, including toxins2. To date, four primary classes of toxins are characterized in P. luminescens. The first class, toxin complexes (Tcs), shows both oral and injectable activity against the Colorado potato beetle3.
    [Show full text]
  • Spiroplasmas Infectious Agents of Plants
    Available online a t www.pelagiaresearchlibrary.com Pelagia Research Library European Journal of Experimental Biology, 2013, 3(1):583-591 ISSN: 2248 –9215 CODEN (USA): EJEBAU Spiroplasmas infectious agents of plants 1,5 * 1 2,5 3,5 4,5 Rivera A , Cedillo L , Hernández F , Romero O and Hernández MA 1Laboratorio de micoplasmas del Instituto de Ciencias de la Benemérita Universidad Autónoma de Puebla 2Centro de Química del Instituto de Ciencias de la Benemérita Universidad Autónoma de Puebla. 3Centro de Agroecología del Instituto de Ciencias de la Benemérita Universidad Autónoma de Puebla. 4Departamento de Investigación en Zeolitas del Instituto de Ciencias de la Benemérita Universidad Autónoma de Puebla. 5Maestría en Manejo Sostenible de Agroecosistemas, Instituto de Ciencias de la Benemérita Universidad Autónoma de Puebla, México. _____________________________________________________________________________________________ ABSTRACT The aim is to present a review of the main features that point to the spiroplasmas as plant pathogens. Spiroplasmas are most often found in association with plants and insects and plants flowers, and the interactions of spiroplasma/host can be classified as commensal, pathogenic or mutualistic. Some insect-derived spiroplasmas are entomopathogens. S. melliferum and S. apis are honey bee pathogens. They cross the insect-gut barrier and reach the hemolymph, where multiply abundantly and kill the bee. Many insects spiroplasmas are not pathogenic, are often restricted to the gut and may be regarded as mutualists or incidental commensals. Among the many components important for growth of spiroplasmas, lipids are some of the most significant. Like members of the genus Mycoplasma, the spiroplasmas so far examined are incapable of the biosynthesis of cholesterol and long- chain fatty acids.
    [Show full text]