DOCSLIB.ORG

Prepared For

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Prepared For Company Name •••DRAFT••• Month/Year Project Title Project Number APPENDIX C Page C-1 TRANS MOUNTAIN EXPANSION PROJECT Minutes of Meeting Meeting Location: Travelodge, Duncan, BC; Team & Discipline: AET TERMPOL Meeting DOCUMENT NUMBER: DATE: January 17, 2014 TIME (24 hour): 1100 to 1400 MEETING TYPE: Internal (send record to [email protected]) Aboriginal (send record to [email protected]) PARTICIPANTS Full Name, Title, Organization Email Phone Additional Al Grove; Hwlitsum First Nations Jack Smith; Halalt First Nations Ruth Sauder; Penelakut Tribe Myrus James; Penelakut Tribe Ronda Jordan; Stz’uminus First Nations Eamon Gaunt; Cowichan Tribes Helen Reid: Cowichan Tribes Larry George; Cowichan Tribes David Robbins; Legal Counsel Celina Albany; Cowichan Tribes Denise James; Penelakut Tribe Bob Gowe; Transport Canada [email protected] Katherine Beavis; Transport Canada [email protected] Michael Davies; Kinder Morgan, Canada [email protected] Madhvi Russell; Transport Canada [email protected] Hart MacKinnon: Transport Canada [email protected] Stafford Reid; Guest Chris Badger; TMEP [email protected]>, Bikram Kanjilal; TMEP [email protected] Georgia Dixon; TMEP [email protected] Gary Youngman; TMEP [email protected] Max Nock; AET; TMEP [email protected] Jamie Andrews; TMEP [email protected] MEETING MINUTES Introductions A distinction was made that there are five different tribes within the Cowichan Nation Alliance and not solely the Cowichan Nation. These Tribes are Halalt, Stz’uminus, Hwiltsum, Cowichan and Penelakut. Al Grove explained that the TERMPOL reports were found to be lacking as there was no reference to Section 35 and various other categories including fishing rights. It was also found that there was silence on First Nations issues. Overview of TERMPOL Process Katherine (Transport Canada) explained that: • the TERMPOL process is voluntary and the process is driven by the proponent; • Transport Canada recommends that proponents seek local and traditional knowledge to inform the studies and enhance the marine safety assessment; • there is an opportunity for input at this time on the TERMPOL surveys and studies; and • these surveys and studies have also been provided to the National Energy Board (NEB) in support of the marine volume of the facilities application. Ideally, comments should be provided to the NEB, Transport Canada and Kinder Morgan Canada Inc. (KMC). Please send records to [email protected] (internal) or [email protected] (external). Page 1 Transport Canada Explained the Timeline for Upcoming Events • Input opportunities in regards to environmental impacts and impacts to Aboriginal rights, these would be best captured through the NEB’s Environmental Assessment and Aboriginal consultation process. • If information is provided to Transport Canada regarding traditional knowledge relevant to the technical review of marine safety (e.g., navigational hazards), it can be considered by the TERMPOL Review Committee during the review of the studies. • Comments on surveys and studies will also be reviewed by Trans Mountain Expansion Project (TMEP). • There is no formal information request system for TERMPOL, however, Transport Canada intends to submit the TERMPOL Report to the NEB and it would be subject to the same rules there as other evidence filed. • It is anticipated that the TERMPOL report will be finalized in the spring 2014. • Information requests should best be directed to the NEB. • The TERMPOL recommendations are not legally binding. Q: Who sits on the TERMPOL review committee? Who gives direction for the reports? A (Transport Canada): The TERMPOL Review Committee is constituted by Transport Canada and includes various branches of federal agencies: the Canadian Coast Guard; BC Coast Pilots; Environment Canada; Port Metro Vancouver; and Fisheries and Oceans Canada (DFO). The proponents are responsible for the studies and the surveys. The TERMPOL Review Committee does not have involvement in producing the studies and surveys, but reviews them once they are submitted. C: With respect to Aboriginal engagement, as this group has been excluded from the report, there is concern that it is too late to be involved in the scoping of these studies. This is a problem at this point. R (Transport Canada): The TERMPOL manual is outdated (2001) and there is duplication with other processes and programs that have started since that time, like environmental assessments. Transport Canada acknowledges that early engagement is better, but beyond discussing with TMEP which surveys and studies would be conducted from the list in the TERMPOL manual, Transport Canada has not been involved in the development of the surveys and studies. Transport Canada can provide more information about how the scoping was done (i.e., which surveys and studies were identified for the TERMPOL). Most of the surveys and studies were included and those that were not were deemed not relevant to the project. C: The communities have a difficult time dealing with [review of TERMPOL studies] as there is a lack of technicians to review these studies. There are only 6 references in 200 pages with no citations (referring to the Quantitative Risk Assessment report from DNV). This report is not a valid academic study and we need to gather and put forward new information. R (Transport Canada): If there are specific concerns relevant to the TERMPOL review process, we encourage CNA to submit them in writing to TMEP and the TERMPOL Review Committee. If concerns are related to environmental impacts, they should be submitted to the NEB. C: It does a dis-service to state that there will be no risk. I think that there will be a spill in the next 100 years. A (Trans Mountain): The consequences of a spill are often considered so dire that the probability side is lost. The report does identify various probabilities that are outlined within the report. The small ones are more probable than a larger one. Q: In terms of the scope of the TERMPOL process and the recommendations, I believe that spill response is not adequately developed. Which process is this likely to come out of? TERMPOL or NEB? A (Transport Canada): It is not crystal clear at this point as to how spill response will be addressed in the TERMPOL report as the regime is currently changing. The Federal Tanker Expert Safety panel recently released a report discussing this. Q: What is the protocol for traditional fishing within shipping lanes? It’s an issue in the communities as the fishing is Please send records to [email protected] (internal) or [email protected] (external). Page 2 important in the communities. A: Every opening is broadcast to shippers. A part of this process is to review the opportunities to improve the current practices. Trans Mountain Expansion Project TERMPOL Process Overview C: It should be noted for this group that once the oil is on the tanker, the oil is no longer owned by KMC. R (Trans Mountain): As a part of the vessel acceptance program, there are requirements and criteria that must be met if shippers want to use the Westridge Terminal. Q: Would communities be compensated if there were a loss to fisheries? A (Trans Mountain): The SOPF provides compensation. Please see additional explanation provided separately. Q: On Page 96 it says that all the vessels will be double-hulled. This says that the majority will be double-hulled. A (Trans Mountain): The tankers will all be double-hulled. Please see additional explanation provided separately. Q: You spoke of workshops (Hazard Identification), who were they done with? A (Trans Mountain): Many experts, however, I think you are referring to the lack of Aboriginal-specific workshops. We did have First Nations attendees at our second hazard meeting in Vancouver. Q: When KMC is asking their experts to develop their report regarding workshops, what is the direction as to who is involved in these workshops? A (Transport Canada): Transport Canada was there as an observer. Q: If increased traffic continues to grow, there will be an increase in accident probability. A (Trans Mountain): There is a traffic forecast in the report. The vessels and tonnage have gone up so, therefore, it’s not necessarily shipping numbers going up. TERMPOL 3.2 has this information. Accident probability in the risk assessment is specific to Trans Mountain’s traffic. Q: Escort tugs were used when transporting coal in the same scenario that Trans Mountain is proposing. This coal was spilled and it was devastating for the community (reference is to an incident that occurred at Westshore Terminals). A (Trans Mountain): The tug practices are different for TMEP. Multiple tugs will be secured to the vessel far before it reaches the berth, and in this example, the coal was spilled as a result of the vessel striking the loading conveyor; the coal was not spilled from the vessel. Q: This probability model is based on averages (referring to weather). What about the abnormalities? The worst-case scenario? A: Computer models have inherent limitations. Averages are used because they mathematically account for a range of potential probabilities. Please see the additional explanation provided separately. C: The pipeline crosses the Fraser River and the Halalt First Nations has an interest in that area. David Robbins showed two maps. One of the Fraser River and the other of the shipping lanes. C: TERMPOL will have conclusions at the federal level. It will be a piece of evidence and these timelines need to be more flexible if we are to have input. R (Transport Canada): We have indicated to Trans Mountain that we are willing to incorporate input provided that is relevant to the TERMPOL review. We have also indicated that we expect our review will take approximately 4 months. As such, input would need to be received by late March or early April. Please send records to [email protected] (internal) or [email protected] (external).
Load more

Recommended publications
  • VIU ASP 2018-19 Proposal-Feb9
    Vancouver Island University Aboriginal Service Plan 2018/19 – 2020/21 Submitted by the Office of Aboriginal Education and Engagement February 2018 1 Table of Contents Table of Contents ............................................................................................................................................................................. 2 Letter from the President ............................................................................................................................................................. 4 Acknowledgement of Traditional Territory/Territories .................................................................................................. 6 Situational Context .......................................................................................................................................................................... 7 Institutional Commitment ............................................................................................................................................................ 9 Engagement ..................................................................................................................................................................................... 10 a. Description of Aboriginal Student Engagement .................................................................................................................................... 10 b. Description of External Partner Engagement .......................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Revisiting the Relationship Between Indigenous Agency and Museum Inventories
    Revisiting the Relationship between Indigenous Agency and Museum Inventories: An Object-Centered Study of the Formation of Lübeck's Jacobsen Collection (1884/1885) from the Northwest Coast of America By Angela Hess Cover: Objects from Lübeck’s Jacobsen collection. Photo: Angela Hess, July 2019 Revisiting the Relationship between Indigenous Agency and Museum Inventories: An Object-Centered Study of the Formation of Lübeck's Jacobsen Collection (1884/1885) from the Northwest Coast of America Author: Angela Hess Student number: s2080087 MA Thesis Archaeology (4ARX-0910ARCH) Supervisor: Dr. M. De Campos Françozo Specialization: Heritage and Museum Studies University of Leiden, Faculty of Archaeology Leiden, June 5, 2020, final version 1 2 Table of Contents Acknowledgements ............................................................................................................. 5 Chapter One: Introduction .................................................................................................. 6 Defining the Research Scope: Aims and Objectives, Hypotheses, Limitations ............. 10 Methodology and Theoretical Frameworks .................................................................. 12 Working Definitions ...................................................................................................... 14 Outline of Chapters ....................................................................................................... 17 Chapter Two: Contexts and Concepts for the Study of the 1884/85 Jacobsen Collection19 2.1
    [Show full text]
  • Sparrow Brothers Summer Leadership Course
    Welcome Package Sparrow Brothers Summer Leadership Course Rooted in Indigenous ways of knowing and leading with adventure-based learning Important information to help prepare for an amazing experience! Locations: Galiano Island, Saanich Peninsula, University of Victoria, City of Victoria, Porpoise Bay Provincial Park, District of Sechelt, Tetrahedron Provincial Park, Sechelt Inlet Dates: June 27th-July 17th Drop Off: June 27th at 3:00pm @ River Rock Casino Pick up: July 17th at 10:00am @ Horseshoe Bay Ferry Terminal Emergency Contact: 604-241-9169 [email protected] We would like to acknowledge that we are going to be traveling through the Penelakut, Songhees, Esquimalt, WSÁNÉC, Musqueam, Squamish and Sechelt First Nations. Preparing for a Successful Experience Sparrow Brothers is a time to introduce Indigenous youth to new perspectives on outdoor learning and what it means to be an Indigenous leader. Equipped with the tools to build their leadership potential, Indigenous youth thrive when connected to the land and each other. All youth need a space and place to gain more self-confidence and become more self-propelled in life, and at this camp we hope to hold space for this to happen! Join us for an exciting and unique experience that was created to let Indigenous youth explore their leadership potential and learn traditional ways of understanding through relationships with each other and the land. With an intention of providing Indigenous youth with a safe space for this experience it is important that they feel prepared. For some youth, this may be the first time they’ve spent several nights away from home and we hope that this welcome package will make the transition from home to Sparrow as stress free as possible for everyone.
    [Show full text]
  • Roberts Bank Terminal 2 Sufficiency Information Request #22 (IR1-22) | Page 1 Request Number IR1-22: Location of Reserves, Commu
    Request Number IR1-22: Location of Reserves, Communities, and Treaty Lands Information Request Provide a single map showing the location of each Indigenous group listed in Section 17.5 of the updated EIS Guidelines, as well as the Musqueam Indian Band and Tsleil-Waututh Nation, in a manner that clearly indicates the location of reserves and communities, or Treaty lands, if applicable, for each Indigenous group. The map should clearly indicate which reserves or treaty lands are associated with which Indigenous group and include the proposed Project location, the associated marine shipping routes and the Canada – United States border. For clarity, the names of the reserves, communities and treaty lands can be listed in a caption outside of the map. VFPA Response 1 As indicated in the Review Panel’s Information Request Package 1, the VFPA has provided 2 several maps that show the information requested. Per the Review Panel’s request, 3 Figure IR1-22-1 in Appendix IR1-22-A shows a single map showing the location of each 4 Aboriginal group listed in section 17.5 of the EIS Guidelines, as well as Musqueam First Nation 5 and Tsleil-Waututh Nation, indicating the location of reserves and communities, or treaty 6 lands, if applicable, for each Aboriginal group. Figure IR1-22-2 in Appendix IR1-22-A 7 shows a map with the traditional territories of each Aboriginal group as provided in the EIS 8 and Marine Shipping Addendum, per the clarification received from the Review Panel on 9 October 3, 2016 (CEA Agency Registry Document #563).
    [Show full text]
  • First Nation and Aboriginal Organizations on Vancouver Island
    First Nation and Aboriginal Organizations on Vancouver Island VI TREATY GROUPS AND TRIBAL COUNCILS BC Treaty Commission Laich-Kwil-Tach Treaty Society 700-1111 Melville Street 1441 Old Island Hwy Vancouver, BC V6E 3V6 Campbell river, BC V9W 2E4 Phone: 250- 482-9200 Phone: 250-287-9460 Fax: 250- 482-9222 Fax: 250-287-9469 Website: http://www.bctreaty.net/ Email: [email protected] Website http://www.lkts.ca/ Hul’qumi’num Treaty Group Member Bands: Wewaikai First Nation, Weiwaikum First Nation, Kwiakah First Nation 12611-B Trans Canada Highway Ladysmith, BC V9G 1M5 Phone: 250-245-4660 Musgamagw Dzawda'enuxw Tribal Council Fax: 250-245-4668 102-2005 Eagle Drive Email: [email protected] Campbell River, BC V9H 1V8 Website: http://www.hulquminum.bc.ca/ Phone: 250-914-3402 Member Bands: Stz'uminus First Nation, Fax: 250-914-3406 Cowichan Tribes, Halalt First Nation, Lake Email: [email protected] Cowichan First Nation, Lyackson First Nation, Website: http://www.mdtc.ca/ Penelakut Tribe Member Bands: Gwawaenuk Tribe, Kwicksutaineuk/Ah-Kwa-Mish Tribes, ‘Namgis Huu-ay-aht Treaty Office First Nation, Dzawada’enuxw First Nation/ Tsawataineuk Indian Band 3483 3rd Avenue Port Alberni, BC V9Y 4E4 Phone: 250-723-0100 Nanwakolas Council Fax: 250-723-4646 203 – 2005 Eagle Drive Campbell River, BC V9H 1V8 Kwakiutl District Council Phone: 250-286-7200 Fax: 250-286-7222 PO Box 1440 Email: [email protected] Port Hardy, BC V0N 2P0 Website: http://www.nanwakolas.com Phone: 250-286-3263 Member Nations: Mamalilikulla Fax: 250-286-3268 Qwe'Qwa'Sot'Em First Nation,
    [Show full text]
  • An Indigenous Teacher Preparation Framework
    AN INDIGENOUS TEACHER PREPARATION FRAMEWORK By Lexie J. Tom, MPA A Dissertation Submitted in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements For the Degree of Doctor of Philosophy In Indigenous Studies: Education University of Alaska Fairbanks May 2018 APPROVED: Dr. Theresa John, Committee Chair Dr. Ray Barnhardt, Committee Member Dr. Barbara Amarok, Committee Member Dr. Michael Marker, Committee Member Dr. Michael Koskey, Chair Center for Cross-Cultural Studies Dr. Todd Sherman, Dean School of Liberal Arts Dr. Michael Castellini, Dean UAF Graduate School ii Abstract The result of this research is a framework to support Indigenous Teacher Preparation within the Native Studies department at Northwest Indian College (NWIC). I attempted to answer three main questions in the duration of this dissertation research. The first question is, how do we recreate an Indigenous method for teaching and learning in a modern educational institution? The second question is, what does a Native Studies faculty member need to be prepared to teach classes? The third question is, how do we measure learning? Participants for this research included elders from the Lummi community, Native Studies faculty members at NWIC, and administrators. As an Indigenous researcher, I have defined my own Indigenous epistemology and this guided my research. I have chosen a qualitative research design to assist me in answering these research questions. The data were analyzed and coded into main themes. This analysis produced teacher competencies and methods of measurement that will be used within the Indigenous teacher preparation framework. This framework is important to the future of the Native Studies Leadership program and NWIC. iii iv This project is dedicated to the Lummi Community and Northwest Indian College Community Hy’shqe (Thank you): To my parents, grandparents, and my elders and ancestors who came before them To (the late) William E.
    [Show full text]
  • Nearshore Natural Capital Valuation Valuing the Aquatic Benefits of British Columbia’S Lower Mainland: Nearshore Natural Capital Valuation
    VALUING THE AQUATIC BENEFITS OF BRITISH COLUMBIA’s LOWER MAINLAND Nearshore Natural Capital Valuation VALUING THE AQUatIC BENEFITS OF BRITISH COLUMBIA’S LOWER MAINLAND: NeaRSHORE NatURAL CAPItaL VALUatION November 2012 David Suzuki Foundation and Earth Economics By Michelle Molnar, Maya Kocian and David Batker AcknOWLEDGEMENTS The authors wish to acknowledge the extremely helpful contributions received during the preparation of this report. First and foremost, the authors wish to acknowledge the Sitka Foundation, who made this report possible. In addition, we would like to thank VanCity, Pacific Parklands, and Vancouver Foundation for their early and ongoing support of our natural capital work. We would like to thank Kelly Stewart (San Jose State University), Heidi Hudson (DSF), Zac Christin (EE), Lola Paulina Flores (EE) and David Marcell (EE) for their research assistance. Thanks to peer reviewers Sara Wilson (Natural Capital Research and Consulting), David Batker (EE), Jay Ritchlin (DSF) and Faisal Moola (DSF) for their advice, guidance and support in strengthening this report. Many thanks to Hugh Stimson (Geocology Research) who provided spatial data analysis and produced all of the maps within this report, and Scott Wallace (DSF) for sharing his fisheries data analysis. Copyedit and design by Nadene Rehnby handsonpublications.com Downloaded this report at davidsuzuki.org and eartheconomics.org Suite 219, 2211 West 4th Avenue 107 N. Tacoma Avenue Vancouver, B.C. V6K 4S2 Tacoma, WA 98403 T: 604.732.4228 T: 253.539.4801 E: [email protected]
    [Show full text]
  • Watersheds 2016
    Watersheds 2016 Building Capacity for Collaboration and Watershed Governance in British Columbia A forum for water practitioners, watershed groups, First Nations, and other decision-makers SEPTEMBER 30–OCTOBER 1, 2016 SFU HARBOUR CENTRE & SFU WOSK CENTRE FOR DIALOGUE Held in Vancouver, B.C. on the unceded Coast Salish territories of the Musqueam, Squamish, and Tsleil-Waututh Nations Edited Proceedings #WATERSHEDS2016 Watersheds 2016 Opening Speakers. Top, left to right: Elder Margaret George, Dr. Vicki Kelly, Dr. Kelly Bannister. Centre: Audience. Bottom, left to right: Merrell-Ann Phare, Ta’Kaiya Blaney, Dr. Zafar Adeel. photos: active ingredient creative studio Watersheds 2016: Building Capacity for Collaboration and Watershed Governance in British Columbia A forum for water practitioners, watershed groups, First Nations, and other decision-makers SEPTEMBER 30–OCTOBER 1, 2016 SFU HARBOUR CENTRE & SFU WOSK CENTRE FOR DIALOGUE Held in Vancouver, B.C. on the unceded Coast Salish territories of the Musqueam, Squamish, and Tsleil-Waututh Nations Edited Proceedings Edited by Megan Spencer, Natasha Overduin, Kelly Bannister, Rosie Simms, Oliver M. Brandes, and Laura Brandes ii Acknowledgements Sponsors These proceedings provide a written record of the one-and-a-half day forum Watersheds 2016: Building Capacity for Collaboration and Watershed Governance in British Columbia. The forum was held from September 30th to October 1st, 2016 on the unceded Coast Salish territories of the Musqueam, Squamish, and Tsleil-Waututh Nations at Simon Fraser University’s Harbour Centre and Wosk Centre for Dialogue in Vancouver, B.C. The event was made Partners possible with the support of a number of sponsors and partners; the forum strategic advisors; and the organizing efforts of the Watersheds 2016 Planning team, which was comprised of members of the four co-hosting organizations.
    [Show full text]
  • REPORT on the Status of Bc First Nations Languages
    report on the status of B.C. First Nations Languages Third Edition, 2018 Nłeʔkepmxcín Sgüüx̣s Danezāgé’ Éy7á7juuthem diitiidʔaatx̣ Gitsenimx̱ St̓át̓imcets Dane-Zaa (ᑕᓀ ᖚ) Hul’q’umi’num’ / Halq’eméylem / hən̓q̓əmin̓əm̓ Háiɫzaqvḷa Nisg̱a’a Sk̲wx̱wú7mesh sníchim Nsyilxcən Dakelh (ᑕᗸᒡ) Kwak̓wala Dene K’e Anishnaubemowin SENĆOŦEN / Malchosen / Lekwungen / Semiahmoo/ T’Sou-ke Witsuwit'en / Nedut'en X̄enaksialak̓ala / X̄a’islak̓ala Tāłtān X̱aad Kil / X̱aaydaa Kil Tsilhqot'in Oowekyala / ’Uik̓ala She shashishalhem Southern Tutchone Sm̓algya̱x Ktunaxa Secwepemctsín Łingít Nuučaan̓uɫ ᓀᐦᐃᔭᐍᐏᐣ (Nēhiyawēwin) Nuxalk Tse’khene Authors The First Peoples’ Cultural Council serves: Britt Dunlop, Suzanne Gessner, Tracey Herbert • 203 B.C. First Nations & Aliana Parker • 34 languages and more than 90 dialects • First Nations arts and culture organizations Design: Backyard Creative • Indigenous artists • Indigenous education organizations Copyediting: Lauri Seidlitz Cover Art The First Peoples’ Cultural Council has received funding Janine Lott, Title: Okanagan Summer Bounty from the following sources: A celebration of our history, traditions, lands, lake, mountains, sunny skies and all life forms sustained within. Pictographic designs are nestled over a map of our traditional territory. Janine Lott is a syilx Okanagan Elder residing in her home community of Westbank, B.C. She works mainly with hardshell gourds grown in her garden located in the Okanagan Valley. Janine carves, pyro-engraves, paints, sculpts and shapes gourds into artistic creations. She also does multi-media and acrylic artwork on canvas and Aboriginal Neighbours, Anglican Diocese of British wood including block printing. Her work can be found at Columbia, B.C. Arts Council, Canada Council for the Arts, janinelottstudio.com and on Facebook. Department of Canadian Heritage, First Nations Health Authority, First Peoples’ Cultural Foundation, Margaret A.
    [Show full text]
  • Protecting Water Our Way
    Protecting Water Our Way FIRST NATIONS FRESHWATER GOVERNANCE IN BRITISH COLUMBIA CONTENTS The First Nations Fisheries Council’s Water for Fish Freshwater Initiative ...............................................................1 Acknowledgements ................................................................................................................................................................ 2 About this Report ...................................................................................................................................................................4 Protecting Water Our Way: Introduction ..........................................................................................................................5 Whose Water is it, Anyway? A Word on Aboriginal Water Rights ...............................................................................8 First Nations-Led Freshwater Governance and Planning in British Columbia: Five Case Stories ........................ 14 1. Yinka Dene ‘Uza’hné Water Declaration and Policy Standards ........................................................................... 15 2. Syilx Nation and siw kw (Water) Declaration and Water Responsibility Planning Methodology ................ 19 3. Water Monitoring: Gateway to Governance ...........................................................................................................25 4. Tla’amin Nation and Negotiating Shared Decision Making in the Theodosia River Watershed .................29 5. Cowichan Tribes and the
    [Show full text]
  • INDIGENOUS VOICES a Report on Indigenous Community Engagement on the Modernization of the Royal BC Museum
    INDIGENOUS VOICES A Report on Indigenous Community Engagement on the Modernization of the Royal BC Museum Wawaditla – Photo: Marcia Dawson October 2019 Indigenous Voices: A Report on the RBCM Indigenous Community Engagement On Modernization Indigenous Voices A Report on Indigenous Community Engagement on the Modernization of the Royal BC Museum FINAL REPORT Prepared for: Indigenous Collections and Repatriation Royal British Columbia Museum 675 Belleville St, Victoria, BC V8W 9W2 Prepared by: Marcia C. Dawson 3150 Alder Street Victoria BC V8X 1N2 www.marcia-dawson.com 2 Indigenous Voices: A Report on the RBCM Indigenous Community Engagement On Modernization Contents Territorial Acknowledgement ...................................................................................................................................4 Hych'ka Siem, Haw.aa, Toyaxsiy'nism, Gilakas’la .....................................................................................................5 Executive Summary ...................................................................................................................................................6 Gathering People and Voice ......................................................................................................................................7 Context .......................................................................................................................................................................8 Task Force Report on Museums and First Peoples ...............................................................................................9
    [Show full text]
  • September 7, 2018 Alanna Dixon Director, Economic & Corporate
    September 7, 2018 Alanna Dixon Director, Economic & Corporate Initiatives Design, Coordination & Outreach Branch Technology, Innovation & Economic Development Division Ministry of Jobs, Trade and Technology By email: [email protected] Dear Ms. Dixon: Our municipal council recently became aware of a potential regulation change that may allow other communities to gain support for economic diversification, planning, and revitalization through the Island Coastal Economic Trust (ICET). We understand that Ministry staff have begun engaging with ICET to explore the inclusion of the CRD electoral areas of Juan de Fuca, Salt Spring Island, and the Southern Gulf Islands in the ICET service area. We are requesting that Bowen Island Municipality be considered a stakeholder in any discussion undertaken by your Ministry. As a rural island community, Bowen Island faces challenges for economic development, job creation, and infrastructure development that are similar to those of the Southern Gulf Islands. Attached is related correspondence that explains our situation more fully. As you will see, we have been actively attempting by a variety of means to gain recognition of Bowen Island’s rural status and to secure the funding support for infrastructure projects we require. I can be reached at 604-947-4255 or [email protected] . Sincerely, Mayor Murray Skeels Bowen Island Municipality Attachments (7) Letter from Acting Chair Susan Morrison, Islands Trust, to Premier John Horgan, “Designation of the Islands Trust Area for Rural Dividend Program and Island Coastal Economic Trust (ICET) Funding,” dated July 11, 2018. In reply: Letter from Assistant Deputy Minister Dave Peterson, FLNRORD, dated August 9, 2018. Letter from MLA Jordan Sturdy to Premier John Horgan, “Bowen Island Municipality Eligibility for Rural Dividend Program and Other Granting Programs,” dated July 4, 2018 .
    [Show full text]