Learning from Experience: Volume IV: Lessons from Australia's Collins

CHILDREN AND FAMILIES The RAND Corporation is a nonprofit institution that EDUCATION AND THE ARTS helps improve policy and decisionmaking through ENERGY AND ENVIRONMENT research and analysis. HEALTH AND HEALTH CARE This electronic document was made available from INFRASTRUCTURE AND www.rand.org as a public service of the RAND TRANSPORTATION Corporation. INTERNATIONAL AFFAIRS LAW AND BUSINESS NATIONAL SECURITY Skip all front matter: Jump to Page 16 POPULATION AND AGING PUBLIC SAFETY SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY Support RAND Purchase this document TERRORISM AND HOMELAND SECURITY Browse Reports & Bookstore Make a charitable contribution For More Information Visit RAND at www.rand.org Explore the RAND National Defense Research Institute View document details Limited Electronic Distribution Rights This document and trademark(s) contained herein are protected by law as indicated in a notice appearing later in this work. This electronic representation of RAND intellectual property is provided for non-commercial use only. Unauthorized posting of RAND electronic documents to a non-RAND website is prohibited. RAND electronic documents are protected under copyright law. Permission is required from RAND to reproduce, or reuse in another form, any of our research documents for commercial use. For information on reprint and linking permissions, please see RAND Permissions. This product is part of the RAND Corporation monograph series. RAND monographs present major research findings that address the challenges facing the public and private sectors. All RAND monographs undergo rigorous peer review to ensure high standards for research quality and objectivity. JOHN F. SCHANK • CESSE IP • KRISTY N. KAMARCK • ROBERT E. MURPHY MARK V. ARENA • FRANK W. LACROIX • GORDON T. LEE LEARNING FROM EXPERIENCE VOLUME IV Lessons from Australia’s Collins Submarine Program Prepared for Australia’s Department of Defence Approved for public release; distribution unlimited NATIONAL DEFENSE RESEARCH INSTITUTE The research described in this report was prepared for Australia’s Department of Defence. The research was conducted within the RAND National Defense Research Institute, a federally funded research and development center sponsored by the Office of the Secretary of Defense, the Joint Staff, the Unified Combatant Commands, the Navy, the Marine Corps, the defense agencies, and the defense Intelligence Community under Contract W74V8H-06-C-0002. Library of Congress Control Number: 2011939404 ISBN: 978-0-8330-5898-0 The RAND Corporation is a nonprofit institution that helps improve policy and decisionmaking through research and analysis. RAND’s publications do not necessarily reflect the opinions of its research clients and sponsors. R® is a registered trademark. © Copyright 2011 RAND Corporation Permission is given to duplicate this document for personal use only, as long as it is unaltered and complete. Copies may not be duplicated for commercial purposes. Unauthorized posting of RAND documents to a non-RAND website is prohibited. RAND documents are protected under copyright law. For information on reprint and linking permissions, please visit the RAND permissions page (http://www.rand.org/publications/ permissions.html). Published 2011 by the RAND Corporation 1776 Main Street, P.O. Box 2138, Santa Monica, CA 90407-2138 1200 South Hayes Street, Arlington, VA 22202-5050 4570 Fifth Avenue, Suite 600, Pittsburgh, PA 15213-2665 RAND URL: http://www.rand.org To order RAND documents or to obtain additional information, contact Distribution Services: Telephone: (310) 451-7002; Fax: (310) 451-6915; Email: [email protected] Preface Large, complex design and construction programs demand personnel with unique skills and capabilities supplemented with practical experiences in their areas of expertise. This is especially true in designing and constructing naval submarines. These vessels require that unique engi- neer and designer skills be nurtured and sustained and that program managers at all levels be trained and educated so as to create the pool of knowledge and experience to conduct a successful program.1 In the past, key technical and management personnel in the submarine community were nurtured and sustained by numerous sequential design and acquisition programs. By participating in one or more programs, personnel gained experience to be the leaders in future programs. But as the operational lives of submarines have lengthened and as defense budgets in most nations have been constrained, new submarine programs are occurring less frequently. Today, there are substantial gaps between new program starts, resulting in fewer opportunities for personnel to gain the experience they need to manage complex pro- cesses and make informed decisions than in the past. Future managers of new programs may not have the benefit of learning from the challenges faced and issues solved in past programs. Recognizing the importance of documenting and imparting experiences from past submarine programs, the Head, Maritime Sys- tems Division, in Australia’s Defence Materiel Organisation asked the RAND Corporation to develop a set of lessons learned from the Collins submarine program that could help inform future program managers. This document describes important lessons learned from theCollins 1 See Schank et al., 2005; Schank et al., 2007. iii iv Learning from Experience, Volume IV program. Other volumes in the series provide lessons from the United States and United Kingdom submarine programs and a summary of lessons across the three countries: • MG-1128/1-NAVY, Learning from Experience, Volume I: Lessons from the Submarine Programs of the United States, United King- dom, and Australia • MG-1128/2-NAVY, Learning from Experience, Volume II: Les- sons from the U.S. Navy’s Ohio, Seawolf, and Virginia Submarine Programs • MG-1128/3-NAVY, Learning from Experience, Volume III: Lessons from the United Kingdom’s Astute Submarine Program. This case study does not focus specifically on the history of the Collins program—an excellent description of the program was documented by Peter Yule and Derek Woolner in The Collins Class Submarine Story: Steel, Spies, and Spin (2008). Rather, we focus on the problems and successes in the program and the reasons behind them. We draw on the Yule and Woolner historical overview as well as a wide range of literature on the Collins program and other submarine design and construction programs. This literature review is supplemented by interviews that we conducted with more than 25 key Australians and Americans involved in the program. The document should be of interest to the naval defense planning, acquisition, logistics, operational, maintenance, technical, and legislative communities and their contractors in the United States, Australia, and United Kingdom. This research was conducted within the Acquisition and Technology Policy Center of the RAND National Defense Research Institute, a federally funded research and development center sponsored by the Office of the Secretary of Defense, the Joint Staff, the Unified Combatant Commands, the Navy, the Marine Corps, the defense agencies, and the defense Intelligence Community. For more information on the Acquisition and Technology Policy Center, see http://www.rand.org/nsrd/ndri/centers/atp.html or contact the director (contact information is provided on the web page). Contents Preface ............................................................................. iii Tables ..............................................................................vii Summary .......................................................................... ix Acknowledgments ............................................................ xxiii Abbreviations ................................................................... xxv CHAPTER ONE Introduction ....................................................................... 1 Organization of the Monograph ................................................. 2 CHAPTER TWO History of Australia’s Submarine Fleet ....................................... 3 Collins Background ................................................................ 5 CHAPTER THREE Setting the Requirements: Evolutionary Versus Revolutionary Approach ...................................................................... 9 CHAPTER FOUR Contracting and Acquisition Strategy .......................................15 CHAPTER FIVE Designing and Building the Collins-Class Vessels ........................21 Designing the Collins .............................................................21 Building the Collins ............................................................. 22 Initial Problems with the Collins Submarines ................................ 24 v vi Learning from Experience, Volume IV Collins Integrated Logistics Support ............................................25 The Role of a Parent Navy in Integrated Logistics Support ................. 26 Training and Personnel ...........................................................29 Current Status of the Collins Class ............................................. 30 Media Coverage ...................................................................31 Successes of the Collins ...........................................................32 CHAPTER SIX Lessons from the Collins Program ...........................................35 Supporting and Managing the Program ...................................... 36 Setting Operational Requirements ..............................................39

Load more