Coldwarsubmarines.Pdf

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Coldwarsubmarines.Pdf COLD WAR SUBMARINES The Project 941/Typhoon was the largest undersea craft ever built. These two—of six completed—are at their remote base of Nerpichya, about six miles from the entrance to Guba Zapadnaya Litsa on the Kola Peninsula, close to the borders with Finland and Norway. (Rubin CDB ME) Other Submarine-Related Books by Norman Polmar The American Submarine Atomic Submarines Death of the Thresher Guide to the Soviet Navy (4 editions) Rickover: Controversy and Genius with Thomas B. Allen Ships and Aircraft of the U.S. Fleet (7 editions) Submarines of the Imperial Japanese Navy with Dorr Carpenter Submarines of the Russian and Soviet Navies, 1718-1990 with Jurrien Noot POTOMAC BOOKS, INC. Copyright © 2004 by Norman Polmar. Published in the United States by Potomac Books Inc. (formerly Brassey’s, Inc.). All rights reserved. No part of this book may be reproduced in any manner whatsoever without written permission from the publisher, except in the case of brief quotations embodied in critical articles and reviews. Library of Congress Cataloging-in-Publication Data Polmar, Norman Cold War submarines: U.S. and Soviet design and construction / Norman Polmar and Kenneth J. Moore—1st ed. p. cm. Includes bibliographical references and index. ISBN 978-1-57488-594-1 1. Submarines (Ships)—United States—History. 2. Submarines (Ships)—Soviet Union. 3. Cold War. I. Moore, Kenneth J., 1942– II. Title. V858.P63 2003 359.9'383'094709045—dc21 2003013123 ISBN 978-1–57488–530–9 (paperback) ISBN 978-1-57488-594-1 (hardcover) Printed in the United States of America on acid-free paper that meets the American National Standards Institute Z39–48 Standard. Potomac Books, Inc. 22841 Quicksilver Drive Dulles, Virginia 20166 First Edition 1098765432 Epigraph It is the nature of human memory to rid itself of the superfluous, to retain only what has proved to be most important in the light of later events. Yet that is also its weak side. Being biased it cannot help adjusting past reality to fit present needs and future hopes. —Milovan Djilas Conversations with Stalin This page intentionally left blank Dedication This book is dedicated to the officers, warrant officers, and enlisted men who served in Soviet and U.S. submarines during the Cold War. They did their duty courageously and steadfastly. Although no shots were fired, many of these sub- mariners lost their lives to fires, flooding, and other accidents. It was the price paid for 45 years of Cold War confrontation and for the rapid development and application of technology. This page intentionally left blank Contents Perspective xi Acknowledgments xv Glossary xix 1 | Genesis 1 2 | Advanced Diesel Submarines 11 3 | Closed-Cycle Submarines 33 4 | U.S. Nuclear-Propelled Submarines 49 5 | Soviet Nuclear-Propelled Submarines 71 6 | Cruise Missile Submarines 85 7 | Ballistic Missile Submarines 103 8 | “Polaris—From Out of the Deep . .” 115 9 | The Quest for Speed 127 10 | Second-Generation Nuclear Submarines 147 11 | The Ultimate Weapon I 167 12 | The Ultimate Weapon II 183 13 | “Diesel Boats Forever” 201 14 | Unbuilt Giants 221 15 | Aircraft-Carrying Submarines 245 16 | Midget, Small, and Flying Submarines 255 CONTENTS ix 17 | Third-Generation Nuclear Submarines 267 18 | Submarine Weapons 293 19 | Fourth-Generation Nuclear Submarines 307 20 | Soviet Versus U.S. Submarines 323 Appendixes A | U.S. Submarine Construction, 1945–1991 335 B | Soviet Submarine Construction, 1945–1991 337 C | U.S. Submarine Reactor Plants 339 D | Soviet Submarine Design Bureaus 341 E | Soviet Ballistic Missile Systems 345 Notes 347 Selected Bibliography 385 Index 395 Author Biographies 407 xCOLD WAR SUBMARINES Perspective ubmarines had a vital role in the 45 years of the The Soviet submarine technological advan- SCold War—1946–1991. Throughout that con- tages for quieting, strengthened double flict, U.S. and Soviet submarines carried out intelli- hulls, higher speed, higher reserve buoyancy, gence collection operations and sought out and and deeper operations are advances which prepared to destroy opposing surface ships and are by and large not stolen or bought from submarines. In addition, from the early 1960s missile- the United States. Some technologies [classi- carrying submarines threatened nuclear attacks on fied deletion] are Soviet design decisions their opponent’s homeland. which are different from our decisions. The possibility of Soviet submarines near Amer- Other technologies ...are the result of Sov- ican coasts firing ballistic missiles, with a much iet engineered high-power-density material shorter time of flight than missiles launched from and hull strength material. The Soviets are the Soviet Union, presented a direct threat to U.S. ahead of us in these technologies.3 command centers, bomber bases, and even land- based strategic missiles, thereby forcing major By the end of the Cold War, U.S. and Soviet changes in the U.S. strategic posture. Similarly, U.S. submarines were radically different in design and missile submarines forced major changes in Soviet capabilities. In view of the importance of undersea naval development and strategic forces deployments. craft—both torpedo/cruise missile attack and Soviet and U.S. submarines of the Cold War strategic missile submarines—it is useful to exam- era had the same origins: Their antecedents were ine how and why this divergence occurred. German U-boat developments of 1943–1945, The causes of this divergence in submarine design especially the Type XXI, the most advanced sub- can be found in (1) differing naval missions, (2) marine to go to sea during World War II. The U.S. differing technical/operational priorities, (3) dif- version of the Type XXI was the Tang (SS 563) fering levels of industrial competence, and (4) class, with similar features being incorporated in differing approaches to submarine design organi- the K1-class “killer” submarines and 52 conver- zations and management. sions of war-built submarines in the so-called Significantly, for much of the Cold War the U.S. GUPPY program.1 The Soviets adopted Type XXI Navy had a highly centralized, authoritarian features in the Whiskey and Zulu designs and their organization. The head of Naval Nuclear Propul- successors.2 The U.S. and Soviet (as well as sion held de facto control of submarine develop- British) submarine communities also had major ment, with virtually unqualified power to veto—if interest in German closed-cycle, or “single-drive,” not enforce—key design decisions.4 Indeed, the submarine propulsion systems, with these sub- incumbent of this position, Admiral H. G. Rick- marines being evaluated in the postwar period by over, by the early 1960s was able to deter any infu- Britain and the Soviet Union. sion of design ideas or concepts from outside of But the undersea craft produced by the respec- the senior officers of the nuclear submarine com- tive navies rapidly diverged in their designs from munity—the so-called submarine mafia—unless it the Type XXI model. In 1985 the U.S. Assistant Sec- corresponded with his views and goals. Those goals retary of the Navy for Research, Engineering, and were based largely on a U.S. Navy plan of 1950 to Systems Melvin R. Paisley observed: develop a series of submarine propulsion plants PERSPECTIVE xi progressing from the 13,400-shaft-horsepower It is convenient to address nuclear-propelled plant of the pioneer Nautilus (SSN 571) to 30,000, submarines of the Cold War in terms of “genera- 45,000, and, ultimately, 60,000 horsepower.5 tions” (see table 2). While this categorization is not In contrast, the Soviet Union had several design precise, it is a useful tool. bureaus engaged in submarine development during Many individuals and organizations assisted in the Cold War (see Appendix D). Those bureaus the writing of this book. They are gratefully were, to a large degree, in competition in submarine acknowledged in the following pages. But all opin- design, although ostensibly each specialized in dif- ions and conclusions—and such errors that may ferent types of submarines. Further, the Soviet appear—are the responsibility of the authors. regime pursued to various stages of fruition inno- —Norman Polmar vative proposals from qualified (and at times Kenneth J. Moore unqualified) submarine designers and naval offi- cers. This, in turn, led to the examination of innu- TABLE 1 merable submarine designs and concepts, which Cold War Submarine Construction* contributed to the highly innovative submarines United States Soviet Union produced by Soviet design bureaus and shipyards. World War II programs Innovation in itself does not necessarily result completed Aug. 1945–1951 in quality or capability. This volume seeks to diesel-electric 23 61 examine the process of submarine design and the closed-cycle — 1** results of those efforts to produce submarines by total 23 62 the two super powers during the Cold War, and to Cold War programs assess their success in translating innovation into completed 1945–1991 capability. diesel-electric 21 399 During the 45 years of the Cold War (1945– closed-cycle — 31 1991) the United States and the Soviet Union put to nuclear-propelled 170 231 sea a combined total of 936 submarines, of which total 191 661 401 were nuclear propelled (see table 1). The Sov- Cold War programs iet regime allocated considerably more resources to completed 1992–2001 the design and construction of submarines during diesel-electric — 3*** the Cold War than did the United States. This Sov- nuclear-propelled 22# 17## iet emphasis on undersea craft continued after the total 22 20 1970s, when major efforts were undertaken to con- Notes:* Does not include two Soviet midget submarines (Project 865) struct large surface warships, including nuclear- and the single U.S. Navy’s midget submarine X-1 (SSX 1). propelled missile cruisers and aircraft carriers.
Recommended publications
  • The Argonauta
    ARGONAUTA The Newsletter of The Canadian Nautical Research Society / Société canadienne pour la recherche nautique Volume XXXVI Number 2 Spring 2019 ARGONAUTA Founded 1984 by Kenneth MacKenzie ISSN No. 2291-5427 Editors Isabel Campbell and Colleen McKee Winston (Kip) Scoville ~ Production/Distribution Manager Argonauta Editorial Office e-mail submissions to: [email protected] or [email protected] ARGONAUTA is published four times a year—Winter, Spring, Summer and Autumn Chair of the Editorial Board: Roger Sarty Editor The Northern Mariner/ William Glover Le marin du nord: Webmaster: Paul Adamthwaite Executive Officers President: Richard Gimblett 1st Vice President: Walter Lewis 2nd Vice President: Faye Kert Treasurer: Errolyn Humphreys Secretary: Michael Moir Membership Secretary: Sam McLean Councillor/Communications: Kip Scoville Councillor: Richard Goette Councillor: Tom Malcomson Councillor: David More Councillor: Jeff Noakes Councillor: Margaret Schotte Councillor: Ian Yeates Membership Business: P.O. Box 34029 Station B, Ottawa, Ontario, K2J 4B1, Canada e-mail: [email protected] Annual Membership including four issues of ARGONAUTA and four issues of THE NORTHERN MARINER/LE MARIN DU NORD: Canadian International Digital Only Individual $70 $80 $30 Benefactor $250 Institutional $95 $105 n/a Corporate $500 Student $35 $35 $35 Patron $1000 or above NASOH n/a n/a $30 Our Website: http://www.cnrs-scrn.org Copyright © CNRS/SCRN and all original copyright holders In this issue of the Argonauta Editorial 1 President’s Corner
    [Show full text]
  • Sail Training, Vocational Socialisation and Merchant Seafarer Careers: the German Initiative in the 1950S1 Alston Kennerley
    Sail Training, Vocational Socialisation and Merchant Seafarer Careers: The German Initiative in the 1950s1 Alston Kennerley Tout au long du 20ème siècle la pertinence de l'expérience pratique dans les navires hauturiers à voile carrée avec de futures carrières de marin dans les navires motorisés a été discutée et remise en cause. Il restent aujourd'hui des pays qui fournissent une telle expérience pour des officiers stagiaires, et il y a un soutien mondial pour donner de l'expérience de la voile aux jeunes dans le cadre du développement caractériel indépendamment du futur métier. La discussion ici se concentre sur l'initiative allemande des années 50, en recherchant des avis personnels au sujet du contexte et du but opérationnel, par le moyen de questionnaires sur l'expérience personnelle de la voile et du métier de marin qui a pu suivre. Les résultats prouvent que les répondants étaient généralement favorables à la possibilité de formation en termes de la gamme étendue des qualifications personnelles engendrées, et que le coût et l'effort sont valables. The history of merchant seafarer training is probably almost as old as deep sea seafaring itself. It can certainly be identified from medieval times, at least in Britain through the adoption of craft guild progression structures: apprenticeship, journeyman craftsman (mate), master craftsman. In British seafaring two levels of apprenticeship evolved: seaman apprenticeship and officer apprenticeship. With the opening of the oceans in the fifteenth and sixteenth centuries, educational dimensions, especially navigation, began to be taught ashore as well as at sea, to those destined for command. Until well into the nineteenth century, skills aspects, grouped under the term seamanship, were always learned or taught through example and experience aboard ships engaged in commercial trading.
    [Show full text]
  • ACTION STATIONS! HMCS SACKVILLE - CANADA’S NAVAL MEMORIAL MAGAZINE VOLUME 34 - ISSUE 2 SUMMER 2015 Volume 34 - Issue 2 Summer 2015
    ACTION STATIONS! HMCS SACKVILLE - CANADA’S NAVAL MEMORIAL MAGAZINE VOLUME 34 - ISSUE 2 SUMMER 2015 Volume 34 - Issue 2 Summer 2015 Editor: LCdr ret’d Pat Jessup [email protected] Action Stations! can be emailed to you and in full colour approximately 2 weeks before it will arrive Layout & Design: Tym Deal of Deal’s Graphic Design in your mailbox. If you would perfer electronic Editorial Committee: copy instead of the printed magazine, let us know. Cdr ret’d Len Canfi eld - Public Affairs LCdr ret’d Doug Thomas - Executive Director Debbie Findlay - Financial Offi cer IN THIS ISSUE: Editorial Associates: Diana Hennessy From the Executive 3 Capt (N) ret’d Bernie Derible The Chair’s Report David MacLean The Captain’s Cabin Lt(N) Blaine Carter Executive Director Report LCdr ret’d Dan Matte Richard Krehbiel Major Peter Holmes Crossed The Bar 6 Photographers: Lt(N) ret’d Ian Urquhart Cdr ret’d Bill Gard Castle Archdale Operations 9 Sandy McClearn, Smugmug: http://smcclearn.smugmug.com/ HMCS SACKVILLE 70th Anniversary of BOA events 13 PO Box 99000 Station Forces in Halifax Halifax, NS B3K 5X5 Summer phone number downtown berth: 902-429-2132 Winter phone in the Dockyard: 902-427-2837 HMCS Max Bernays 20 FOLLOW US ONLINE: Battle of the Atlantic Place 21 HMSCSACKVILLE1 Roe Skillins National Story 22 http://www.canadasnavalmemorial.ca/ HMCS St. Croix Remembered 23 OUR COVER: In April 1944, HMCS Tren- tonian joined the East Coast Membership Update 25 fi shing fl eet, when her skipper Lieutenant William Harrison ordered a single depth charge Mail Bag 26 fi red while crossing the Grand Banks.
    [Show full text]
  • AIR-INDEPENDENT PROPULSION – AIP Technology Creates a New Undersea Threat Page 1 of 6
    AIR-INDEPENDENT PROPULSION – AIP Technology Creates a New Undersea Threat Page 1 of 6 AIR-INDEPENDENT PROPULSION AIP Technology Creates a New Undersea Threat Walter Type XVIIB up on the stocks. Pictured above is the German Walter Type XVIIB U-1406, partially dismantled shortly after the end of World War II. U-1406 was turned over to the U.S. Navy as a war prize and soon disposed of, but the Royal Navy later operated her sister ship, U-1407, as HMS Meteorite to gain experience in hydrogen-peroxide propulsion technologies. As interest mounts in "Air-Independent Propulsion" (AIP) for enhancing the performance of small, defensive submarines, a serious new underwater threat is developing in littoral waters. Increasingly, smaller nations unwilling or unable to accept the high cost of nuclear power to achieve greater underwater endurance and longer range are turning to lower-priced and less ambitious alternatives that still offer significant operational advantages over conventional diesel- electric submarines. The best of the latter boats, such as the German-designed Type 209 or the Russian KILO, can remain submerged on battery at slow speed for periods on the order of three to five days. But now, several AIP schemes in development or already in operation can increase slow-speed endurance to as much as three weeks or a month. While still dwarfed by the potential of nuclear power, AIP offers diesel submarines a remarkable increase in capability. AIP - The Early History Despite their initial successes, submarine pioneers were still eager to find some means to free their boats from the necessity of surfacing frequently for access to the atmospheric oxygen demanded by the gasoline or diesel engines that charged the batteries.
    [Show full text]
  • The Caldwell Watchmain
    The Caldwell Watchmain VOL. 30. COLUMBIA, LOUISIANA, FRIDAY, AUGUST 25, 1916. NO. 38 the one-tiime capital of Louis:laiw. fiha CATERPILLAR TRACTOR USED BY US. TROOPS bee-) removed in the wrclairin of wha: JIN IN as ITALIA SAMPLES OF WATER has rcolnl to be known the Allen ti I11:iio11n, one of the f .w oncte pa:!ial hoenu : of ('ivil war and i-rlcostr:tcttion WARATSALONIKI SUBJECT TOTEST das. On its site the nto.w own er of tiil pro,-prty will eret:i a nIi •d!'n,re i- STATE BOARD OF HEALTH Iew present-day Shrev''porit')s up- JOIN BALKAN FIGHT -- ALTER- coni(-ernid with the story of lhietown TAKES IMPORTANT STEP IN NATE GAINS AND LOSSES ON areiaware that once upon a ti:i,' THE ENTIRE FRONT. INTEREST OF PEOPLE. Slhrrveport was the c:ipital of thi, state'. Yet such it was. and this ctl hoiits , which later cnme ,toh.' knIlown RESULTS WILL BE PUBLISHED as the' Allen mansion. was the gov- SAYS OFFErNSIVE IS GENERAL ernor's mansion and the capitol. Late in the war an(d llurin: the early reconstruction period loul!iana hal ~~i~c.,, ~ P J -,~ Before Present Investigation Is Com- Allies Are Believed to Have a Force two capitals, New Orlban;, where the of Some 700,000 British, French and pleted Examinations Will Have Republican governor had his head- Been Made From 10 to 30 Sam- Servian Troops on the Sa- quarters, and Shreveport, where Hen- loniki Front. ples From Every Parish. ry Watkins Allen, war governor of DeImocratic Louisiana, for whom Al- lendale, once fashionable residence Paris.
    [Show full text]
  • MERCHANTS BANK 1 Sale
    BARBER SHOP W. C. SMITH DR. W. R DAVEY 5J5?S I5E(Si i:: TCLACavyORX IMC mm haapttal cMNMham -- ttANUFACTUnSnS C?TtCil 3 f cr: CHOP IN THE CITY GINGER ALE AND CLU3 CODA srr pooa to poctotwcb J L- C C BOMANNON. M?? 151 SsKtfc r-rNo.- 37J Daytona, Florida MondaViJanuary 15, 1917 1 "CUR CALOT-O- " I.QLJ ILJtL. A , . - 1 1 vv-M- , LJ' L . 11 1111 r J 111 I Hi CU1 III III , " , 1: J JV J "V B UaVC III - lZr'v u; II! U W v - v v - ' eolers from the most cblicate to some 17 0 DDF reds like the "fair ones" faces show. - 0:7S CZ2I LAS Ql Si LL TO o:ty 4C0 FEET GRUBER-MORIU- CII-STOCICED-Y OClt S HARDWARE CO. a COW OF YEARS SWEEP- SGUTll OF THE FERilY innEffTivouMS CONVICTION OF F. CC- -1 ER TENNESSEE, ARKANSAS Ctt ETTI AND UAUHV L CRICC3 CF f-- D NORTHERN MISSISSIPPI FERRY LOCATION IS AT BEND Deutcchlcmd Coieved Again BE CALIFORNIA COKFIRZTSD BY APP- CTCSSI GENERAL IN WEST. OF RIVER AND WAR DEPART- WILL .CERTIFIED, ADVERTIS- ED AND AND ELLATE COURT. (Tfci Associated Press.) MENT WANTS DIFFERENT LO Newring Shores of America SOLD WORK ON t - rtonm j ar swooping the CATION. (The Associated Press.) THAT PORTION OF DIXIE .HIGH- WASHINGTON. Jan. IS. Proseco--. Cr-- tr frtton of tho northern and WAY COMPLETED AT ONCE. tions are transporting women firocs. -- states, attended by a cold Michael Sholtz will in all probabil- NEW YORK. Jan. 15. An unidenti- - ing here today from Bordeaux.
    [Show full text]
  • Russian Museums Visit More Than 80 Million Visitors, 1/3 of Who Are Visitors Under 18
    Moscow 4 There are more than 3000 museums (and about 72 000 museum workers) in Russian Moscow region 92 Federation, not including school and company museums. Every year Russian museums visit more than 80 million visitors, 1/3 of who are visitors under 18 There are about 650 individual and institutional members in ICOM Russia. During two last St. Petersburg 117 years ICOM Russia membership was rapidly increasing more than 20% (or about 100 new members) a year Northwestern region 160 You will find the information aboutICOM Russia members in this book. All members (individual and institutional) are divided in two big groups – Museums which are institutional members of ICOM or are represented by individual members and Organizations. All the museums in this book are distributed by regional principle. Organizations are structured in profile groups Central region 192 Volga river region 224 Many thanks to all the museums who offered their help and assistance in the making of this collection South of Russia 258 Special thanks to Urals 270 Museum creation and consulting Culture heritage security in Russia with 3M(tm)Novec(tm)1230 Siberia and Far East 284 © ICOM Russia, 2012 Organizations 322 © K. Novokhatko, A. Gnedovsky, N. Kazantseva, O. Guzewska – compiling, translation, editing, 2012 [email protected] www.icom.org.ru © Leo Tolstoy museum-estate “Yasnaya Polyana”, design, 2012 Moscow MOSCOW A. N. SCRiAbiN MEMORiAl Capital of Russia. Major political, economic, cultural, scientific, religious, financial, educational, and transportation center of Russia and the continent MUSEUM Highlights: First reference to Moscow dates from 1147 when Moscow was already a pretty big town.
    [Show full text]
  • In the Lands of the Romanovs: an Annotated Bibliography of First-Hand English-Language Accounts of the Russian Empire
    ANTHONY CROSS In the Lands of the Romanovs An Annotated Bibliography of First-hand English-language Accounts of The Russian Empire (1613-1917) OpenBook Publishers To access digital resources including: blog posts videos online appendices and to purchase copies of this book in: hardback paperback ebook editions Go to: https://www.openbookpublishers.com/product/268 Open Book Publishers is a non-profit independent initiative. We rely on sales and donations to continue publishing high-quality academic works. In the Lands of the Romanovs An Annotated Bibliography of First-hand English-language Accounts of the Russian Empire (1613-1917) Anthony Cross http://www.openbookpublishers.com © 2014 Anthony Cross The text of this book is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International license (CC BY 4.0). This license allows you to share, copy, distribute and transmit the text; to adapt it and to make commercial use of it providing that attribution is made to the author (but not in any way that suggests that he endorses you or your use of the work). Attribution should include the following information: Cross, Anthony, In the Land of the Romanovs: An Annotated Bibliography of First-hand English-language Accounts of the Russian Empire (1613-1917), Cambridge, UK: Open Book Publishers, 2014. http://dx.doi.org/10.11647/ OBP.0042 Please see the list of illustrations for attribution relating to individual images. Every effort has been made to identify and contact copyright holders and any omissions or errors will be corrected if notification is made to the publisher. As for the rights of the images from Wikimedia Commons, please refer to the Wikimedia website (for each image, the link to the relevant page can be found in the list of illustrations).
    [Show full text]
  • The Third Battle
    NAVAL WAR COLLEGE NEWPORT PAPERS 16 The Third Battle Innovation in the U.S. Navy's Silent Cold War Struggle with Soviet Submarines N ES AV T A A L T W S A D R E C T I O N L L U E E G H E T R I VI IBU OR A S CT MARI VI Owen R. Cote, Jr. Associate Director, MIT Security Studies Program The Third Battle Innovation in the U.S. Navy’s Silent Cold War Struggle with Soviet Submarines Owen R. Cote, Jr. Associate Director, MIT Security Studies Program NAVAL WAR COLLEGE Newport, Rhode Island Naval War College The Newport Papers are extended research projects that the Newport, Rhode Island Editor, the Dean of Naval Warfare Studies, and the Center for Naval Warfare Studies President of the Naval War College consider of particular Newport Paper Number Sixteen interest to policy makers, scholars, and analysts. Candidates 2003 for publication are considered by an editorial board under the auspices of the Dean of Naval Warfare Studies. President, Naval War College Rear Admiral Rodney P. Rempt, U.S. Navy Published papers are those approved by the Editor of the Press, the Dean of Naval Warfare Studies, and the President Provost, Naval War College Professor James F. Giblin of the Naval War College. Dean of Naval Warfare Studies The views expressed in The Newport Papers are those of the Professor Alberto R. Coll authors and do not necessarily reflect the opinions of the Naval War College or the Department of the Navy. Naval War College Press Editor: Professor Catherine McArdle Kelleher Correspondence concerning The Newport Papers may be Managing Editor: Pelham G.
    [Show full text]
  • The Seven Seas Tattler Issue 4.3 – August 2020
    The Seven Seas Tattler Issue 4.3 – August 2020 Good Day fellow members and welcome to the August edition of Tattler. As always, your comments, contributions and critique are welcome - Send to me at [email protected] Chairman's Report The Committee has not been idle during this lockdown and is managing issues of the Club virtually to determine the way forward when the Club reopens for business. The Committee is highly appreciative of Ancient Mariners and Honorary members who have forfeited their privilege of no subs, to make a donation for this financial year to assist the Club tackle the financial predicament it finds itself in during this lockdown period. The same appreciation goes towards the 100 club winners who have donated their winnings back to the Club. BZ. The Club is still fortunate to be able to remunerate its staff during this period with the exception of the Club Manager who has refused to take a salary and donated it back to the Club. This, once again, is highly appreciated. The good intentions of the above is soured a bit by certain members who have yet to pay their annual subscription. I urge those members to settle their accounts as soon as possible. Jonathan Golding is putting an auction together during this lockdown period to generate funding for the Club. It would appreciated if members support this endeavor as much as possible. Looking forward to seeing you all at the Club, sooner rather than later. Be safe. Birthdays in August The Club wishes the following members a very happy birthday and hopes that year ahead will be very kind to each of you! Capt.
    [Show full text]
  • Russia's Akademik Lomonosov – the First Modern Floating Nuclear
    Russia’s Akademik Lomonosov – The First Modern Floating Nuclear Power Plant (FNPP) Peter Lobner, 15 May 2021 1. Introduction Designated Project 20870, construction of Akademik Lomonosov started on 15 April 2007, when the keel was laid at the Sevmash shipyard in Severodvinsk, which also is Russia’s premier submarine building shipyard. Originally, Akademik Lomonosov was expected to supply power to the Sevmash shipyard itself and the town of Severodvinsk, in Northwest Russia. Cutaway drawing showing the general arrangement of the Akademik Lomonosov. Source: Rosatom In August 2008, the hull of Akademik Lomonosov was transferred to the Baltic Shipyard in St. Petersburg, where a second “keel laying” was held in May 2009. Plans for deploying the FNPP were reconsidered, leading to the final selection of Pevek, a remote Arctic coastal city in Russia’s Far East. The FNPP was launched on 30 June 2010 and outfitting continued with the vessel secured dockside at the Baltic Shipyard. Two un-fueled OKBM Afrikantov KLT-40S modular pressurized water reactors (PWRs) were installed in October 2013. 1 After work on the vessel and reactor systems was completed in April 2018, Akademik Lomonosov was towed 4,000 km (2,485 miles) around Norway to Murmansk, where the reactors were fuelled and tested at Rosatomflot facilities, which also support their nuclear- powered icebreaker fleet. In June 2019, the Russian nuclear regulatory agency Rostekhnadzor issued a 10-year license to Rosenergoatom to operate Akademik Lomonosov until 2029. After successfully completing testing, Akademik Lomonosov departed Murmansk on 23 August 2019 and was towed 4,770 km (2,964 miles) along the Northern Sea Route, arriving at its final destination on 9 September 2019 at a new protected pier at Pevek, which is about 980 km (609 miles) west of the Bering Strait.
    [Show full text]
  • Marine Nuclear Power 1939 – 2018 Part 1 Introduction
    Marine Nuclear Power: 1939 – 2018 Part 1: Introduction Peter Lobner July 2018 1 Foreword In 2015, I compiled the first edition of this resource document to support a presentation I made in August 2015 to The Lyncean Group of San Diego (www.lynceans.org) commemorating the 60th anniversary of the world’s first “underway on nuclear power” by USS Nautilus on 17 January 1955. That presentation to the Lyncean Group, “60 years of Marine Nuclear Power: 1955 – 2015,” was my attempt to tell a complex story, starting from the early origins of the US Navy’s interest in marine nuclear propulsion in 1939, resetting the clock on 17 January 1955 with USS Nautilus’ historic first voyage, and then tracing the development and exploitation of marine nuclear power over the next 60 years in a remarkable variety of military and civilian vessels created by eight nations. In July 2018, I finished a complete update of the resource document and changed the title to, “Marine Nuclear Power: 1939 – 2018.” What you have here is Part 1: Introduction. The other parts are: Part 2A: United States - Submarines Part 2B: United States - Surface Ships Part 3A: Russia - Submarines Part 3B: Russia - Surface Ships & Non-propulsion Marine Nuclear Applications Part 4: Europe & Canada Part 5: China, India, Japan and Other Nations Part 6: Arctic Operations 2 Foreword This resource document was compiled from unclassified, open sources in the public domain. I acknowledge the great amount of work done by others who have published material in print or posted information on the internet pertaining to international marine nuclear propulsion programs, naval and civilian nuclear powered vessels, naval weapons systems, and other marine nuclear applications.
    [Show full text]