Characterization of the Complete Mitochondrial Genome of Cavisoma Magnum (Southwell, 1927) (Acanthocephala Palaeacanthocephala)
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Infection, Genetics and Evolution 80 (2020) 104173 Contents lists available at ScienceDirect Infection, Genetics and Evolution journal homepage: www.elsevier.com/locate/meegid Research paper Characterization of the complete mitochondrial genome of Cavisoma T magnum (Southwell, 1927) (Acanthocephala: Palaeacanthocephala), first representative of the family Cavisomidae, and its phylogenetic implications ⁎ Nehaz Muhammada, Liang Lib, , Sulemana, Qing Zhaob, Majid A. Bannaic, Essa T. Mohammadc, ⁎ Mian Sayed Khand, Xing-Quan Zhua,e, Jun Maa, a State Key Laboratory of Veterinary Etiological Biology, Key Laboratory of Veterinary Parasitology of Gansu Province, Lanzhou Veterinary Research Institute, Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Lanzhou, Gansu Province 730046, PR China b Key Laboratory of Animal Physiology, Biochemistry and Molecular Biology of Hebei Province, College of Life Sciences, Hebei Normal University, 050024 Shijiazhuang, Hebei Province, PR China c Marine Vertebrate, Marine Science Center, University of Basrah, Basrah, Iraq d Department of Zoology, University of Swabi, Swabi, Khyber Pakhtunkhwa, Pakistan e Jiangsu Co-innovation Centre for the Prevention and Control of Important Animal Infectious Diseases and Zoonoses, Yangzhou University College of Veterinary Medicine, Yangzhou, Jiangsu Province 225009, PR China ARTICLE INFO ABSTRACT Keywords: The phylum Acanthocephala is a small group of endoparasites occurring in the alimentary canal of all major Acanthocephala lineages of vertebrates worldwide. In the present study, the complete mitochondrial (mt) genome of Cavisoma Echinorhynchida magnum (Southwell, 1927) (Palaeacanthocephala: Echinorhynchida) was determined and annotated, the re- Cavisomidae presentative of the family Cavisomidae with the characterization of the complete mt genome firstly decoded. The Mitochondrial genome mt genome of this acanthocephalan is 13,594 bp in length, containing 36 genes plus two non-coding regions. The Phylogeny positions of trnV and SNCR (short non-coding region) in the mt genome of C. magnum are different comparing to Systematics those of the other acanthocephalan species available in GenBank. Phylogenetic analysis based on amino acid sequences of 12 protein-coding genes using Bayesian inference (BI) supported the class Palaeacanthocephala and its included order Polymorphida to be monophyletic, but rejected monophyly of the order Echinorhynchida. Our phylogenetic results also challenged the validity of the genus Sphaerirostris (Polymorphida: Centrorhynchidae). The novel mt genomic data of C. magnum are very useful for understanding the evolutionary history of this group of parasites and establishing a natural classification of Acanthocephala. 1. Introduction and represented a synonym of Eoacanthocephala (Gazi et al., 2016; Muhammad et al., 2019a,b). The interrelationships of these classes The phylum Acanthocephala is a small group of endoparasites with needs further studies. approximately 1300 species reported from the alimentary tract of var- Among the four classes, Palaeacanthocephala with over 840 species ious vertebrates worldwide (Gazi et al., 2012; Amin, 2013; Gazi et al., placed into three orders Echinorhynchida, Polymorphida and 2015). According to the traditional classification, Acanthocephala was Heteramorphida, has the richest species diversity. In the class classified into four classes, including Eoacanthocephala, Palaea- Palaeacanthocephala, the order Echinorhynchida includes more than canthocephala, Polyacanthocephala and Archiacanthocephala (Amin, 470 species, which are mainly parasitic in teleost fish, and represents 1987, 2013). This morphology-based classification was supported by the largest group (Amin, 1987; Pichelin and Cribb, 2001; Smales, 2012; some molecular phylogenetic analyses based on 18S/28S or Amin, 2013). The monophyly of Palaeacanthocephala and Poly- 18S + 28S + cox1 genetic data, respectively (García-Varela et al., morphida was strongly supported by some phylogenetic studies based 2002; García-Varela and Nadler, 2006; Verweyen et al., 2011). How- on mitochondrial (mt) genomic data (Gazi et al., 2015; Gazi et al., ever, recent mitogenomic phylogenetic results suggested that Poly- 2016; Muhammad et al., 2019a,b; Song et al., 2019), but some regarded acanthocephala should be considered as a member of Eoacanthocephala Palaeacanthocephala as paraphyly based on 18S genetic data (Herlyn ⁎ Corresponding authors. E-mail addresses: [email protected] (L. Li), [email protected] (J. Ma). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.meegid.2020.104173 Received 30 August 2019; Received in revised form 26 December 2019; Accepted 2 January 2020 Available online 07 January 2020 1567-1348/ © 2020 Published by Elsevier B.V. N. Muhammad, et al. Infection, Genetics and Evolution 80 (2020) 104173 et al., 2003). The non-monophyly of Echinorhynchida was reported by Table 1 many previous phylogenetic studies based on morphological characters Primers used for amplification and sequencing of the complete mitochondrial (Monks, 2001) and/or molecular data (Near et al., 1998; García-Varela genome of Cavisoma magnum. et al., 2000, 2002; Near, 2002; García-Varela and Nadler, 2005; García- Primers Sequence (5′ → 3′) Gene/Region Size (bp) Varela and Nadler, 2006; Verweyen et al., 2011; Gazi et al., 2015; García-Varela et al., 2019). CMF1 GACTGCGCTAAGGTAGCGTG 16S 328 CMR1 GGTCTAAACTCAGATCACGTAC The taxanomy and classification of C. magnum has gone through CMF2 GAGTTACTTAAGGGTTAACAG 16S - nad5 4583 numerous revision for nearly a century. It was originally placed in fa- CMR2 CTGCTAAATACACACCTCAC mily Echinorhynchidae, genus Oligoterorhynchus Monticelli, 1914 CMF3 CATGATGGTTTTGTTGTTATG nad5 305 (Southwell, 1927). Then a new family Oligoterorhynchidae and genus CMR3 GTGGGAGCAGCTATAGCAAG Cavisoma was established containing C. magnum (Van Cleave, 1931). CMF4 AGAGTTTTGTTTAGCTTTAG nad5 - cytb 1725 CMR4 AACCGACTTAAAGACCACAC Subsequently, genus Cavisoma was elevated to a sub-family level as CMF5 GGTTATGTATTGCCTTGAGG cytb 426 Cavisominae and moved into family Echinorhynchidae (Meyer, 1932). CMR5 CTCTGGCTTAATGTGGATAG Cavisoma/Cavisominae was regarded as a separated family CMF6 GGTATTACATTTTTGTTCAACC cytb - 12S 1643 (Petrochenko, 1956). However, Golvan suggested Cavisoma should be CMR6 AACACTATTACACAGGTATC CMF7 CTCTATTTCAGATAAAGTCTG 12S 395 placed in family Fessisentidae (Golvan, 1969). Later, genus Cavisoma CMR7 GTGTTGACGGGCGATATGTAC was retained in family Cavisomidae within the order Echinorhynchida CMF8 GTTTATCGTATGATTGTTAGTGC 12S - 16S 5336 (Amin, 1985; Arthur et al., 1995; Amin, 2013; Amin et al., 2018). CMR8 GTGTTAATACAACTAACACC The family Cavisomidae is a small group of acanthocephalans in order Echinorhynchida (Meyer, 1932) which mainly parasitizes in fishes, which currently includes ten genera (Amin, 2013). Recently, 2.2. Molecular procedures molecular phylogenetic results considered this family to be a para- phyletic group based on sequenced cox1 data (Lisitsyna et al., 2019). For molecular studies, the genomic DNA was extracted from one Among the 10 genera in Cavisomidae, genus Cavisoma contains only specimen (preserved in ethanol) using small-scale sodium dodecyl-sul- one species C. magnum (Southwell, 1927), commonly occurring in the fate /proteinase K solution with column purification system (Wizard_SV marine fishes of the orders Perciformes, Mugiliformes and Gonor- Genomic DNA Purification Kit, Promega, Madison, USA) according to ynchiformes in Pacific Ocean (Amin et al., 2018). the operation manual (Gasser et al., 2006). Long PCR reactions were The mt genomic data are important and useful genetic markers for conducted in a total volume of 30 μl, containing 13.5 μl PrimeSTAR phylogenetic studies to determine the evolutionary relationships of Max DNA polymerase (Takara, Dalian, China), 13.5 μl ddH2O, 1.5 μl of high taxa in Acanthocephala (Gazi et al., 2012; Weber et al., 2013; Gazi total genomic DNA and 1.5 μl of each primer (25 pmol) (Table 1). Long et al., 2015, 2016; Muhammad et al., 2019a,b; Song et al., 2019). PCR reactions were performed with an initial denaturation at 96 °C for However, our present knowledge regarding mt genome sequences of 1 min, 12 cycles for 15 s at 96 °C, 25 s at 52–56 °C, 0.5–5 min at 60 °C. acanthocephalans is still very limited. To date, only three species of Then the denaturation were performed at 94 °C for 2 min, 22 cycles of Echinorhynchida have been reported, namely Leptorhynchoides thecatus 15 s at 96 °C, 25 s at 52–56 °C, 0.5–5 min at 66 °C. The 68 °C final- Linton, 1891 (Rhadinorhynchidae), Echinorhynchus truttae Schrank, extension was conducted for 10 min. 1788 (Echinorhynchidae) and Brentisentis yangtzensis Yu and Wu, 1989 The amplified fragments were cloned in pMD19-T vector, andpo- (Illiosentidae) (Steinauer et al., 2005; Weber et al., 2013; Song et al., sitive clones were sequenced by Sangon Company (Shanghai, China) 2019). The lack of mt genomic data of representatives belonging to and Genewiz (Beijing, China) using primer walking strategy (Table 1). different family-level taxa embarrassed to establish a natural classifi- For checking the chromatograms the Chromas v.1.62. was used. The cation of Acanthocephala based on mitogenomic phylogenetic analysis. sequences were assembled using DNASTAR (https://www.dnastar. In the present study, the complete mt genome of C. magnum was com). The codon usage and nucleotide composition were analyzed sequenced for the first time based on specimens collected from the using MEGA7 (Kumar et al., 2016). The boundaries