An Art Educators' Perception of an Art Professional Development Workshop Wonda Y
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Walden University ScholarWorks Walden Dissertations and Doctoral Studies Walden Dissertations and Doctoral Studies Collection 2019 An Art Educators' Perception of an Art Professional Development Workshop Wonda Y. Hillard Walden University Follow this and additional works at: https://scholarworks.waldenu.edu/dissertations Part of the Art Education Commons, and the Curriculum and Instruction Commons This Dissertation is brought to you for free and open access by the Walden Dissertations and Doctoral Studies Collection at ScholarWorks. It has been accepted for inclusion in Walden Dissertations and Doctoral Studies by an authorized administrator of ScholarWorks. For more information, please contact [email protected]. Walden University College of Education This is to certify that the doctoral study by Wonda Hillard has been found to be complete and satisfactory in all respects, and that any and all revisions required by the review committee have been made. Review Committee Dr. Susan Adragna, Committee Chairperson, Education Faculty Dr. Kimberley Alkins, Committee Member, Education Faculty Dr. Leslie Van Gelder, University Reviewer, Education Faculty Chief Academic Officer Eric Riedel, Ph.D. Walden University 2019 Abstract Art Educators’ Perceptions of an Art Professional Development Workshop by Wonda Y. Hillard MEd, South Carolina State University, 1988 BS, South Carolina State University, 1981 Doctoral Study Submitted in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree of Doctor of Education Walden University April 2019 Abstract There are no guidelines in South Carolina for developing workshops that reflect the needs of art educators, and there are no tools to evaluate and support their professional development. The problem is a lack of informative, substantive, and academically oriented art inservices that are standards-based and focused on the enhancement of pedagogy, teaching strategies, and content. The purpose of this case study was to explore participants’ perceptions of an art professional development workshop as an approach to examining art standards, instructional strategies, and policy changes. Dewey’s experiential theory served as the conceptual framework. A purposeful sample of 10 art educators who attended a district-sponsored professional development workshop participated in this study. After the workshop, data about educators’ perceptions of the inservice were collected through a beta test and a focus group with 2 participants, 1 open- ended questionnaire with 8 participants, and a workshop observation with 20 participants. Data were analyzed using comparative analysis to identify patterns in the data. Member checking and triangulation were used to verify the data and control bias. Five themes emerged from the data: adult-centered hands-on learning, professional development experiences, grants, collaboration and networking, and best practices. This study contributes to social change by showing the importance of on-going adult-centered, research-based, hands-on professional development for educators addressing visual art standards, practice, instructional strategies, policy changes, and the facilitation of student- centered activities. Art Educators’ Perceptions of an Art Professional Development Workshop by Wonda Y. Hillard M.Ed., South Carolina State University, 1988 BS, South Carolina State University, 1981 Doctoral Study Submitted in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree of Doctor of Education Walden University April 2019 Dedication I would like to dedicate my doctoral study to my children, Jasmine and Jared. My children were the foundation of my inspiration throughout this process. They encouraged me to pursue my interest in building my leadership skills of inspiring others to dream more, learn more, do more, and become more as described by John Q. Adams. Their support inspired me to never give up even through the struggles and difficult times that caused me to pause and breathe often in this journey. I would also like to dedicate my doctoral study to my angels: my father, Richard Hillard, my aunt, Geraldine “Gerald” Hillard Matthews, and my grandparents, Maria Mallard Hillard and John “Tootise” Hillard. You taught me to make good judgment and seek knowledge (Psalms 119:66). Thank you for nurturing, supporting, encouraging, and watching over me throughout my life. I know that you are watching me from Heaven and I want to thank you for every milestone that you have helped me to meet and experiences that we have shared. “Baby girl.” I would like to dedicate my doctoral degree to my art professors at South Carolina State University--Dr. Leo Twiggs and Dr. Terry K. Hunter, who encouraged their young scholars to always practice their craft through a demonstration of creating art and teaching art, and professionalism. Dr. Twiggs and Dr. Hunter helped to develop my teaching style and enthusiasm for arts advocacy as an African American female, who would introduce art to students in rural Title I schools. Dr. Hunter took my peers and me to our first printmaking professional development workshop at Florida A & M University. I would be remiss if I did not dedicate my doctoral degree to Mr. Peter L. Felder II, “Mr. Pete,” who inspired me to pursue my doctorate and seek out opportunities of learning through rigorous course work and professional development training at the district and state level. Finally, I would like to dedicate my doctoral degree to the art educators (veteran and novice), who serve as advocates for arts education and art programs in their communities, schools, districts, and state. I began this process to make a difference in the world. However, the difference has been a transformation within me. I hope that this study will make a difference in terms of improving art development workshops for art educators and enrich pedagogy and self-efficacy. Table of Contents List of Tables .......................................................................................................................v List of Figures .................................................................................................................... vi Section 1: Introduction to the Study ....................................................................................1 Introduction ....................................................................................................................1 Problem Statement .........................................................................................................2 Evidence of the Problem at Local Level ................................................................. 5 Evidence of the Problem from the Professional Literature ..................................... 9 Nature of the Study ......................................................................................................14 Guiding Research Questions ........................................................................................15 Purpose of the Study ....................................................................................................15 Conceptual Framework ................................................................................................16 Operational Definitions ................................................................................................17 Assumptions, Limitations, Scope, and Delimitations ..................................................20 Scope and Delimitations ..............................................................................................23 Significance of the Study .............................................................................................24 Summary ......................................................................................................................27 Section 2: Literature Review .............................................................................................29 Introduction ..................................................................................................................29 Conceptual Framework ................................................................................................30 Educational Policy Changes ........................................................................................31 Review of Related Research ........................................................................................36 Professional Development .................................................................................... 37 i Pedagogy, Arts Integration, and Best Practices .................................................... 56 Conclusion ...................................................................................................................65 Section 3: Methodology .....................................................................................................66 Introduction ..................................................................................................................66 Design 66 Research Questions ......................................................................................................68 Context .........................................................................................................................68 Participants ............................................................................................................ 68 Sampling ............................................................................................................... 69 Procedure