Ll Do for Donald Trump …

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Ll Do for Donald Trump … What They’ll Do for Donald Trump … In Robert Bolt’s 1960 play A Man For All Seasons, an overly ambitious little man named Richard Rich commits perjury against his friend, a great man of conscience, Sir Thomas More – perjury that he knows will send Thomas to his death. And why does he do it? Because Richard Rich needs to be somebody bigger than he is. He needs recognition. He betrays his friend in exchange for a job he thinks will give him status – Attorney General of Wales. After the trial, when Sir Thomas knows he is doomed, he confronts Richard Rich and utters a verse from the Bible – with a twist. “It profits a man nothing to give his soul for the whole world … but for Wales?” – making sure Richard, a status-seeking careerist, understands what he has just done: that he gave his soul not for the whole world – but for a trivial job in a trivial place. None of us is pure. Few of us are as noble as Sir Thomas More. We make accommodations. Sometimes we convince ourselves that our motives are noble, when in fact they’re selfish. But if we’re going to sell out our principles, we should be motivated by something of great significance. Each of us can decide what that might be, what would cause us to abandon our long held beliefs. Selling out always comes with a price. Sir Thomas lived in the 16th century, but his stinging observation holds a message even now, some 500 years later. And so in his final days in office, a question comes to mind about our current president: If it profits a man nothing to give his soul for the whole world … why do it for Donald Trump? Donald Trump no longer fascinates me. By now, I know who he is and I wish he would just go away and leave us alone, his legitimate accomplishments notwithstanding. But his most loyal supporters are another matter. Not his rank and file passionate allies, many of whom aren’t as formally educated as the liberal and progressive elite. They aren’t as sophisticated, at least not as the elite define sophistication. They’re more likely to vacation in Branson, Missouri than in Martha’s Vineyard. They felt the scorn, the disrespect of the elite class. And they saw Donald Trump as a man who cared for them. They also understood that he wasn’t the Hitler or Mussolini his unhinged critics claimed he was. And I’m not talking about the Latinos or African Americans who voted for Donald Trump in numbers many on the left found both surprising and troubling. Under Donald Trump’s stewardship the economy helped minorities and they understandably wanted four more years with him at the helm. They’re not the ones who fascinate me. I understand why Donald Trump was and still is a hero to many of them. But the media elite, the ones who abandoned their conservative principles for Donald Trump; the ones who sacrificed their dignity for Donald Trump … they fascinate me. In a recent column on this site, John Daly names names. “People like Mollie Hemingway, Mark Levin, and Greg Gutfeld, who were once outspoken Trump critics, turned into some of the president’s most shameless sycophants and defenders,” he writes. “When one looks back atNational Review’s famous ‘Against Trump’ issue from 2016, they’ll find contributor names like Glenn Beck, Ben Domenech, Brent Bozell, Katie Pavlich, and Dana Loesch … all of whom now bend over backwards not to say anything the slightest bit disparaging about Trump. Some [were] even busy … promoting Trump’s 2020 election conspiracy theories.” There are others in the media who sold out for Donald Trump, a man who if it suited his purpose would abandon them without a second thought. Does Rush Limbaugh really admire a chronic liar and narcissist like Donald Trump? I have trouble believing that he does. Yet Rush can’t say enough good things about Mr. Trump. Such is the hold our soon-to-be former president has on otherwise strong willed individuals. Evangelical leaders are just as bad, maybe worse. I understand why they believe Donald Trump would be more in tune with their conservative values than Joe Biden. But surely they know that Donald Trump maliciously ridicules and humiliates his opponents. That he mocks their looks. That he makes fun of their physical disabilities. That he lacks empathy. If white evangelical leaders don’t like Joe Biden, fine. But enthusiastically supporting a man like Donald Trump who has trashed so many Christian values strikes me as shameful. And in Donald Trump’s world, no one is safe, not even his political allies. Just ask Jeff Sessions, his earliest supporter in the U.S. Senate. One “wrong” move and he was banished — and humiliated by his former boss on the way out. Or more recently, ask the president’s treasury secretary, Steve Mnuchin, who spent many long hours negotiating a COVID relief bill with Nancy Pelosi and Chuck Schumer only to have Donald Trump blow the deal up at the last minute, calling it a “disgrace.” Loyalty is important to Mr. Trump – but it’s a one-way street. In addition to everything else, “Trump has taught his opponents not to believe a word he says, his followers not to believe a word anyone else says, and much of the rest of the country to believe nobody and nothing at all,” as Bret Stephens put it in the New York Times. The sycophants must know this. Maybe they’re afraid of Donald Trump, afraid of what he might say about them if they held him accountable. Maybe they just like being close to power, to give the president advice, to convince him that he’s as wonderful as he thinks he is. Don’t overestimate the lure of a pat on the head from the man at the helm. Maybe the pols fear retribution from his adoring base if they stand up to him. But is any of that worth their dignity? Or to put it another way: “It profits a man nothing to give his soul for the whole world” … but for Donald Trump? Where Will Media-Conservatism Go After Trump? By about six months into the Trump presidency, most media- conservatives had figured out how to win back over the freshly remodeled right-wing audience they previously thought they understood. Standing up to runaway spending and big-government overreach were no longer winning themes. Neither were promoting free markets, personal responsibility, and moral decency. Constitutional conservatism? That was yesterday’s news. So was the importance of strong and competent American leadership both domestically and abroad. A few things remained the same, like the culture war and those evil left-wing progressives hell-bent on destroying the America we love. But the broader formula that would all but assure those who followed it a healthier and more lucrative future in the business (at least for the next four years) was Trump fandom. I’m talking about the folklore portrayal of Donald Trump as America’s great savior, a man who defied enormous odds to win the presidency, and was working tirelessly to deliver the country from years of societal decay brought on by the political left and the government establishment. For that, according to those who’d adopted the narrative as the central thesis of their brand, Trump deserved celebratory, unconditional loyalty and obedience. And those who stood in his way, or even so much as criticized him, or questioned his judgment, rhetoric, and actions, were the enemy. Often that enemy was the media, usually the liberal media but really anyone who was reporting stories that were inconvenient to the president. Conservative commentators who rejected Trumpism were seen as especially horrid individuals — traitors in fact, even when they hadn’t changed their political and ideological positions on anything. Particularly unsettling was watching a number of 2016 election-era “Never Trump” conservatives, upon realizing what Trump’s White House tenure could mean for their careers, do a rhetorical about-face on much of what they’d stood and spoken out for over many years. They even started publicly attacking their conservative colleagues (including friends), for still saying what they themselves had been saying just months earlier. Principles were out. Trump-partisanship was in. And little has changed since then. Those who chose to maintain their intellectual consistency, personal integrity, and conservative sensibilities paid a significant professional price in the era of Trump — a price that included lost radio shows, less air-time, contributor contracts not being renewed, speaking engagements drying up, and far fewer web-hits. Those who sold out, by and large, reached new professional heights. Looking back at that time, it’s still pretty striking how easily the political makeover came for some. People like Mollie Hemingway, Mark Levin, and Greg Gutfeld, who were once outspoken Trump critics, turned into some of the president’s most shameless sycophants and defenders. When one looks back at National Review’s famous “Against Trump” issue from 2016, they’ll find contributor names like Glenn Beck, Ben Domenech, Brent Bozell, Katie Pavlich, and Dana Loesch… all of whom now bend over backwards not to say anything the slightest bit disparaging about Trump. Some are even busy at the moment promoting Trump’s 2020 election conspiracy theories. But as stark as such changes were, Trumpist commentary proved to be pretty simple, at least from an argumentative standpoint. It was definitely easier than laying out intellectual, good-faith thoughts on nuanced political topics.
Recommended publications
  • Under the Second Amendment
    PROTESTS, INSURRECTION, AND THE SECOND AMENDMENT The Gun Rights Movement and “Arms” Under the Second Amendment By Eric Ruben, Assistant Professor, SMU Dedman School of Law, and Fellow, Brennan Center for Justice at New York University School of Law PUBLISHED JUNE 2021 Brennan Center for Justice at New York University School of Law Introduction After Donald Trump supporters breached the U.S. Capitol on January 6 wielding weapons including tasers, chemical sprays, knives, police batons, and baseball bats, Sen. Ron Johnson (R-WI) remarked that the insurrection “didn’t seem . armed.”1 Johnson, who is A-rated by the National Rifle Association (NRA),2 observed, “When you hear the word ‘armed,’ don’t you think of firearms?”3 For many, the answer is likely yes. This essay describes how the gun rights movement has contributed to the conflation of arms and firearms. In doing so, it shows how that conflation is flatly inconsistent with the most important legal context for arms — the Second Amendment. Neglecting non-gun arms obscures how Americans actually own, carry, and use weapons for self-defense and elevates guns over less lethal alternatives that receive constitutional protection under District of Columbia v. Heller.4 Now is the time to place gun rights into the broader Second Amendment context, on the eve of the Supreme Court’s next big Second Amendment case, New York State Rifle & Pistol Association v. Corlett.5 Heller’s Definition of Arms and Its Potential Implications The Second Amendment protects arms, not firearms,6 and in Heller, the Supreme Court defined an arm as any “[w]eapon[] of offence” or “thing that a man wears for his defence, or takes into his hands,” that is “carr[ied] .
    [Show full text]
  • Nancy Simpson Mornings 5:30A-10A
    Call Letters KTTS KSPW KSGF KRVI Format Country Top 40 News Talk Adult Hits/Variety Frequency 94.7 FM 96.5 FM 104.1 FM/1260 AM 106.7 FM Station Country Best 94.7 KTTS Power 96.5 Springfield’s Talk 104.1 106.7 The River DJs 5:30a-10a 6a-10a 6a-9a 6a-10a (Mon-Fri)/10a-1p (Saturday) Nancy & Rick Fotsch & Friends Nick Reed Ace & TJ 10a-3p 10a-3p Sarah Myers 6a-10a (Saturday)/8p-12a (Sunday) Chelsea Julian Syndicated Line Up: Casey Kasem Radio Stations Radio 3p-7p Old School Lunch Hour/ Glenn Beck 9a-12p (Sunday) Commander Tom 3p-6p Dana Loesch Nina Blackwood (Absolutely 80’s) 7p-12a The Ginge Sean Hannity B-Dub 7p-11p Mark Levin Weekends Tino Cochino Ben Shapiro Steve Smith Weekends Katie Chelsea Website ktts.com power965.com ksgf.com 1067theriver.com Core Listeners A 25-49 W 18-34 M 35-64 A 25-44 Core Artists Tim McGraw, Luke Combs, Post Malone, Taylor Swift, News Talk Madonna, Aerosmith, Michael Jackson, Miranda Lambert, Garth Brooks, Justin Bieber, Shawn Mendes, Bon Jovi, Def Leppard, Linkin Park, Phil Carrie Underwood, Blake Shelton, Camilla Cabello, Maroon 5 Collins, Cyndi Lauper, Imagine Dragons, SummitMedia Jason Aldean, Luke Bryan John Mellencamp, 3 Doors Down Format Country 94.7 KTTS is the Ozarks’ Heritage country station; winner of the Country Music Association Small Market Station of the Year (2016,2018), winner of the Academy of Country Music Small Market Station of the Year (2015,2017), and one of 10 radio stations in the entire country to receive a Crystal Award from the National Association of Broadcasters for service for our community.
    [Show full text]
  • Benghazi.Pdf
    ! 1! The Benghazi Hoax By David Brock, Ari Rabin-Havt and Media Matters for America ! 2! The Hoaxsters Senator Kelly Ayotte, R-NH Eric Bolling, Host, Fox News Channel Ambassador John Bolton, Fox News Contributor, Foreign Policy Advisor Romney/Ryan 2012 Gretchen Carlson, Host, Fox News Channel Representative Jason Chaffetz, R-UT Lanhee Chen, Foreign Policy Advisor, Romney/Ryan 2012 Joseph diGenova, Attorney Steve Doocy, Host, Fox News Channel Senator Lindsay Graham, R-SC Sean Hannity, Host, Fox News Channel Representative Darrell Issa, R-CA, Chairman, House Committee on Oversight and Government Reform Brian Kilmeade, Host, Fox News Channel Senator John McCain, R-AZ Mitt Romney, Former Governor of Massachusetts, 2012 Republican Presidential Nominee Stuart Stevens, Senior Advisor, Romney/Ryan 2012 Victoria Toensing, Attorney Ambassador Richard Williamson, Foreign Policy Advisor, Romney/Ryan 2012 ! 3! Introduction: Romney’s Dilemma Mitt Romney woke up on the morning of September 11, 2012, with big hopes for this day – that he’d stop the slow slide of his campaign for the presidency. The political conventions were in his rear-view mirror, and the Republican nominee for the White House was trailing President Obama in most major polls. In an ABC News/Washington Post poll released at the start of the week, the former Massachusetts governor’s previous 1-point lead had flipped to a 6-point deficit.1 “Mr. Obama almost certainly had the more successful convention than Mr. Romney,” wrote Nate Silver, the polling guru and then-New York Times blogger.2 While the incumbent’s gathering in Charlotte was marked by party unity and rousing testimonials from Obama’s wife, Michelle, and former President Bill Clinton, Romney’s confab in Tampa had fallen flat.
    [Show full text]
  • Blueprint for a Better Deal for Black America
    Blueprint for a Better Deal for Black America April 2018 A program of the National Center for Public Policy Research 20 F Street NW, Suite 700 Washington, D.C. 20001 NationalCenter.org This publication is dedicated to the memory of Amy Moritz Ridenour, the founding CEO of the National Center for Public Policy Research, without whose support Project 21 wouldn’t exist. Project 21’s Blueprint for a Better Deal for Black America - 2 Executive Summary It has been over a half-century since the enactment of landmark civil rights legislation targeting the scourge of racial discrimination. Unfortunately, too many black families today suffer from a non-racial scourge – conditions that undermine upward mobility and perpetuate unacceptable levels of poverty, crime and other social ills. The vaunted social safety net has become a web that ensnares black families in a vicious cycle of dependency. Project 21, a network of black leaders from across the nation, has identified 10 key areas for reform and offers 57 concrete, budget-neutral recommendations to remove barriers blocking blacks from reaching their full potential and ensuring the American dream is attainable for all. Project 21 Areas of Focus and Key Recommendations: Promoting K–12 Educational Choice: Establish federal needs-based vouchers funded in part through an IRS 1040 voluntary donation check-off. Improve school security through upgrades in entry doors and by allowing trained school personnel access to guns. Improving Higher Education: Require schools to meet minimum graduation rate standards for both general and minority student populations to be eligible for federal student financial aid.
    [Show full text]
  • The Editors the Editors
    20160215 _ UPC_cover61404-postal.qxd 1/26/2016 10:29 PM Page 1 February 15, 2016 $4.99 THE EDITORS GlennGlenn BeckBeck GG DavidDavid BoazBoaz GG L.L. BrentBrent BozellBozell IIIIII GG MonaMona CharenCharen GG BenBen DomenechDomenech ErickErick EricksonErickson GG StevenSteven F.F. HaywardHayward GG MarkMark HelprinHelprin GG WilliamWilliam KristolKristol YuvalYuval LevinLevin GG DanaDana LoeschLoesch GG AndrewAndrew C.C. McCarthyMcCarthy GG DavidDavid McIntoshMcIntosh MichaelMichael MedvedMedved GG EdwinEdwin MeeseMeese IIIIII GG RussellRussell MooreMoore MichaelMichael B.B. MukaseyMukasey GG KatieKatie PavlichPavlich GG JohnJohn PodhoretzPodhoretz R.R. R.R. RenoReno GG ThomasThomas SowellSowell CalCal ThomasThomas www.nationalreview.com base_milliken-mar 22.qxd 7/21/2015 3:41 PM Page 2 base_milliken-mar 22.qxd 7/21/2015 3:41 PM Page 3 TOC_QXP-1127940144.qxp 1/27/2016 1:50 PM Page 1 Contents FEBRUARY 15, 2016 | VOLUME2 LXVIII, NO. 2 | www.nationalreview.com $4.99 ON THE COVER Page 26 Donald Trump is not Reihan Salam on Bernie Sanders deserving of conservative p. 20 support in the caucuses and primaries. Trump is a BOOKS, ARTS philosophically un moored & MANNERS political opportunist who 41 A MAN IN FULL would trash the broad Clark S. Judge reviews Destiny and Power: The American Odyssey conservative ideological of George Herbert Walker consensus within the THE EDITORS Bush, by Jon Meacham, and The GGlennlenn Beck GG David Boaz GG L.L. BrentBrent BozellBozell IIIIII GG Mona Charen GG Ben Domenech Quiet Man: The Indispensable EErickrick EricksonErickson GG SSteventeven F. Hayward GG MMarkark Helprin GG WWilliamilliam Kristol GOP in favor of a free- YuvalYuval Levin GG DanaDana Loesch GG AndrewAndrew C.
    [Show full text]
  • CQR Tea Party Movement
    Res earc her Published by CQ Press, a Division of SAGE CQ www.cqresearcher.com Tea Party Movement Will angry conservatives reshape the Republican Party? he Tea Party movement seemed to come out of nowhere. Suddenly, citizens angry over the multi- billion-dollar economic stimulus and the Obama ad - T ministration’s health-care plan were leading rallies, confronting lawmakers and holding forth on radio and TV. Closely tied to the Republican Party — though also critical of the GOP — the movement proved essential to the surprise victory of Republi - can Sen. Scott Brown in Massachusetts. Tea partiers say Brown’s Tea kettle held high, a Tea Party activist dressed like a election proves the movement runs strong outside of “red states.” Revolutionary War soldier rallies tax protesters in Atlanta on April 15, 2009. It was among several But some political experts voice skepticism, arguing that the Tea protests held in cities around the nation. Party’s fiscal hawkishness won’t appeal to most Democrats and many independents. Meanwhile, some dissension has appeared among tea partiers, with many preferring to sidestep social issues, I such as immigration, and others emphasizing them. Still, the move - N THIS REPORT ment exerts strong appeal for citizens fearful of growing govern - S THE ISSUES ....................243 I ment debt and distrustful of the administration. BACKGROUND ................249 D CHRONOLOGY ................251 E CURRENT SITUATION ........256 CQ Researcher • March 19, 2010 • www.cqresearcher.com AT ISSUE ........................257 Volume 20, Number 11 • Pages 241-264 OUTLOOK ......................259 RECIPIENT OF SOCIETY OF PROFESSIONAL JOURNALISTS AWARD FOR EXCELLENCE N AMERICAN BAR ASSOCIATION SILVER GAVEL AWARD BIBLIOGRAPHY ................262 THE NEXT STEP ..............263 TEA PARTY MOVEMENT CQ Re search er March 19, 2010 THE ISSUES SIDEBARS AND GRAPHICS Volume 20, Number 11 • Does the Tea Party rep - Tea Partiers Running in MANAGING EDITOR: Thomas J.
    [Show full text]
  • Ted Cruz Is Not a Constitutionalist, and Therefore Cannot Be a Constitutional Conservative
    Do you believe in the constitution? In the Bible? Ted Cruz is not a constitutionalist, and therefore cannot be a constitutional conservative. He is an establishment conservative. Neither he nor Rubio are qualified candidates. But the birther question is only the tip of the iceberg: The most common tenets to support Ted Cruz deal with the following questions: Is Ted Cruz Constitutionally able to hold the Office of the United States Presidency? Is Ted Cruz a ‘True Conservative’? Is Ted Cruz devoted to the ‘Word of God’? I will try to answer these questions as shortly as possible, but truth be told, I could do a long dissertation on the matter. The answers to all of those Questions are No, No, and No. I've almost completed the first question, but it's enough to share now. http://www.mediaaccess.hu/userspace/pdf_files/Dispelling%20the%20Myths%20that %20Support%20Ted%20Cruz.pdf http://www.mediaaccess.hu/index.php?module=sourcepage&id=598&lang=1 In #TedCruz own words!! Ted Cruz Said, Obama Not Eligible To Be President; Citizen Parents? “ I am honored that so many Americans want me to run for the office of President. However, my moral convictions require that I state clearly for the record that I am not eligible for the office of president or vice president according to Article II – Section I – Clause V of the U.S. Constitution, which requires that only a Natural Born Citizen of the United States, born of an American Citizen Father, seek or hold these offices. As I was born the son of a Cuban Citizen living in Canada at the time, I am not a Natural Born Citizen of the United States.
    [Show full text]
  • KTTS-Media-Kit-.Pdf
    Format Country 94.7 KTTS is the Ozarks’ Heritage country station; winner of the Country Music Association Small Market Station of the Year (2016,2018), winner of the Academy of Country Music Small Market Station of the Year (2015,2017), and one of 10 radio stations in the entire country to receive a Crystal Award from the National Association of Broadcasters for service for our community. KTTS has a regional 100,000 watt signal blanketing Southwest Missouri with the best in Country music and local news/weather 24 hours a day, 7 days a week • News & Weather – hourly from the KTTS 24-Hour News Center • Breaking News – when news breaks, we break in! • Go Patrol Traffic reports mornings & afternoons Monday-Friday every ten minutes from 6am- 8:30am & 4pm-6pm • KTTS Interactive Radar in-studio • Severe weather coverage • KTTS First Alert Forecast Awards 2020 Regional Edward R. Murrow Award | Best Newscast 2020 Missouri Broadcasters Association Certificate of Merit | KTTS Morning Show with Nancy and Rick 2020 Missouri Broadcasters Association First Place, Medium Market Radio | Breaking News 2020 Missouri Broadcasters Association First Place, Breaking Weather Coverage Event 2020 Missouri Broadcasters Association First Place, Podcast | The Toll 2018, 2016 CMA Small Market Station of the Year 2018, 2016 NAB Crystal Award 2017, 2015 ACM Small Market Station of the Year Nancy Simpson Mornings 6a-10a After spending 20 years in the KTTS News department, I am now one half of the KTTS Morning Show, and live in Nixa with my husband and two children. In addition to radio, I love spending time with family, cooking, and attending baseball games (especially St.
    [Show full text]
  • (Un)Building the Wall Reinventing Ourselves As Others in the Post-Truth Era
    INTRODUCTION (Un)building the Wall Reinventing Ourselves as Others in the Post-truth Era ROUHOLLAH AGHASALEH Georgia State University Background: Out of Comfort Zones N MY SYLLABI, I write for my students (future teachers) that, unlike many teachers who I romanticize teaching and learning, learning is not always fun. Sometimes we need to feel pains and share our pains to learn. Hopefully, this will make all of us better teachers to lift a bit of a burden from our students’ shoulders and make our pedagogy more accessible. Thinking and writing about post-truth is quite uncomfortable, as it requires self-criticism, critical reflection, and confession. We are trained as professionals to present our arguments tactfully—in a way that would not offend anyone. However, positioning my scholarship in the (post)critical camp, I find this problematic. How can I be critical and not disrupt the unjust structures? How can I challenge the normalized meta-narratives and expect all readers to be happy with my writing? I realize that this professionalism leads us to professional tribalism where we write for those who agree with us and expect recognition from them, which is counter-transformative. How could we make a difference if we only engaged in conversations with those who are already in agreement? bell hooks (1996) has eloquently made the case for why and how education should be transformative. How can I, as an educator, work for transformation and yet be afraid of making myself and my readers uncomfortable? In 2016, I wrote to my #bad_hombre and #nasty_women friends that Trump is old news.
    [Show full text]
  • Firearms in the Family
    Firearms in the Family CAROLYN B. RAMSEY* This Article considers firearms prohibitions for domestic violence offenders, in light of recent Supreme Court decisions and the larger, national debate about gun control. Unlike other scholarship in the area, it confronts the costs of ratcheting up the scope and enforcement of such firearms bans and argues that the politicization of safety has come at the expense of a sound approach to gun control in the context of intimate-partner abuse. In doing so, it expands scholarly arguments against mandatory, one-size-fits-all criminal justice responses to domestic violence in a direction that other critics have been reluctant to go, perhaps because of a reflexive, cultural distaste for firearms. Both sides in the gun-control debate rely on starkly contrasting, gendered images: the helpless female victim in need of state protection, including strictly enforced gun laws, and the self-defending woman of the National Rifle Association’s “Refuse to be a Victim” campaign. Neither of these images accurately describes the position of many domestic violence victims whose partners have guns, and neither image responds effectively to the heterogeneity of conduct leading to a protection order or a misdemeanor domestic violence conviction that triggers federal and state firearms bans. The emphasis the National Rifle Association and other pro-gun organizations place on a woman’s right to carry a firearm in self-defense ignores the most common homicide risks women face, as well as structural inequalities that contribute to gender violence. Yet, significant problems afflict an uncritically anti-gun approach, too. First, gun-control advocates tend to ignore the reality of intimate-partner abuse—a reality in which some women fight back; some family livelihoods depend on jobs for which firearms are required; not all misdemeanants become murderers; and victims have valid reasons for wanting to keep their partners out of prison.
    [Show full text]
  • The Tea Party Movement, Framing, and the US Media
    This article was downloaded by: [Jules Boykoff] On: 23 November 2011, At: 08:46 Publisher: Routledge Informa Ltd Registered in England and Wales Registered Number: 1072954 Registered office: Mortimer House, 37-41 Mortimer Street, London W1T 3JH, UK Social Movement Studies Publication details, including instructions for authors and subscription information: http://www.tandfonline.com/loi/csms20 The Tea Party Movement, Framing, and the US Media Jules Boykoff a & Eulalie Laschever b a Department of Politics and Government, Pacific University, Forest Grove, OR, USA b Department of Sociology, University of California, Irvine, CA, USA Available online: 22 Nov 2011 To cite this article: Jules Boykoff & Eulalie Laschever (2011): The Tea Party Movement, Framing, and the US Media, Social Movement Studies, 10:4, 341-366 To link to this article: http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/14742837.2011.614104 PLEASE SCROLL DOWN FOR ARTICLE Full terms and conditions of use: http://www.tandfonline.com/page/terms-and-conditions This article may be used for research, teaching, and private study purposes. Any substantial or systematic reproduction, redistribution, reselling, loan, sub-licensing, systematic supply, or distribution in any form to anyone is expressly forbidden. The publisher does not give any warranty express or implied or make any representation that the contents will be complete or accurate or up to date. The accuracy of any instructions, formulae, and drug doses should be independently verified with primary sources. The publisher shall not be liable for any loss, actions, claims, proceedings, demand, or costs or damages whatsoever or howsoever caused arising directly or indirectly in connection with or arising out of the use of this material.
    [Show full text]
  • Media-Kit.Pdf
    Springfield’s Talk 104.1 informs and empowers listeners in the Ozarks with the news and information they want. Listeners depend on it! The station puts a focus on what’s important to listeners in the Ozarks: local news, weather, the economy, events that shape our world, and insight on how those events affect life here in the Ozarks. The station (104.1 FM & 1260 AM) is Springfield’s premier news talk product and the Ozarks’ national news source with updates from Fox News. Springfield’s Talk 104.1 delievers expanded, in-depth coverage on local and state news during the KSGF Mornings with Nick Reed (6a-9a) & provides breaking local news and severe weather coverage using the established brand equity of the KTTS 24-Hour News Center Glenn Beck Mark Levin Dana Loesch Ben Shapiro Sean Hannity Armstrong & Getty 53.8% Female 46.2% Male Household Income $100K-$150K 83% Ages 35-64 Nick Reed Mornings 6a-9a Since high school, I have been behind a microphone, first in music, before moving to talk radio, a natural move being a lover of the format. I am not your typical “political talk show host”… I don’t view one side as always ‘good’ while the other side always ‘bad’, party affiliation doesn’t determine the truth, neither does ‘good intention’. Sarah Myers Producer, Mornings on KSGF 6a-9a “Avery” on Power 96.5 Weekends I have been working with KSGF since 2017 and behind a microphone since the age of 17 where I landed a job in radio. Growing up in Fair Grove, I consider myself a country girl at heart….I love going to the lake, hiking and fishing.
    [Show full text]