DOCSLIB.ORG

Reducing Bird Damage in the State of Vermont

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Reducing Bird Damage in the State of Vermont ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT REDUCING BIRD DAMAGE IN THE STATE OF VERMONT In cooperation with: United States Department of Interior United States Fish and Wildlife Service Migratory Bird Program Region 5 The Vermont Fish and Wildlife Department Prepared by: UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE ANIMAL AND PLANT HEALTH INSPECTION SERVICE WILDLIFE SERVICES November 2015 1 TABLE OF CONTENTS ACRONYMS ............................................................................................................................................... 3 CHAPTER 1: PURPOSE AND NEED FOR ACTION 1.1 INTRODUCTION .......................................................................................................................... 4 1.2 PURPOSE ....................................................................................................................................... 5 1.3 NEED FOR ACTION ...................................................................................................................... 5 1.4 DECISIONS TO BE MADE ......................................................................................................... 21 1.5 SCOPE OF THIS ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT ............................................................. 21 1.6 RELATIONSHIP OF THIS DOCUMENT TO OTHER ENVIRONMENTAL DOCUMENTS . 24 1.7 AUTHORITY OF FEDERAL AND STATE AGENCIES ........................................................... 25 1.8 COMPLIANCE WITH LAWS AND STATUTES ....................................................................... 28 CHAPTER 2: AFFECTED ENVIRONMENT AND ISSUES 2.1 AFFECTED ENVIRONMENT ..................................................................................................... 34 2.2 ISSUES ASSOCIATED WITH BIRD DAMAGE MANAGEMENT ACTIVITIES ................... 36 2.3 ISSUES CONSIDERED BUT NOT IN DETAIL WITH RATIONALE ...................................... 41 CHAPTER 3: ALTERNATIVES 3.1 DESCRIPTION OF THE ALTERNATIVES ................................................................................ 46 3.2 ALTERNATIVES CONSIDERED BUT NOT ANALYZED IN DETAIL .................................. 51 3.3 STANDARD OPERATING PROCEDURES FOR BIRD DAMAGE MANAGEMENT ............ 53 3.4 ADDITIONAL STANDARD OPERATING PROCEDURES SPECIFIC TO THE ISSUES ...... 54 CHAPTER 4: ENVIRONMENTAL CONSEQUENCES 4.1 ENVIRONMENTAL CONSEQUENCES FOR ISSUES ANALYZED IN DETAIL .................. 56 CHAPTER 5: LIST OF PREPARERS AND PERSONS CONSULTED 5.1 LIST OF PREPARERS AND REVIEWERS .............................................................................. 104 5.2 LIST OF PERSONS CONSULTED ............................................................................................ 104 LIST OF APPENDICES APPENDIX A LITERATURE CITED ................................................................................................... 105 APPENDIX B METHODS AVAILABLE FOR USE OR RECOMMENDATION BY THE WS PROGRAM ..................................................................................................................... 122 APPENDIX C BIRD SPECIES EVALUATED IN THE ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT ......... 130 APPENDIX D THREATENED AND ENDANGERED SPECIES THAT ARE FEDERALLY LISTED IN THE STATE .............................................................................................................. 133 APPENDIX E THREATENED AND ENDANGERED SPECIES THAT ARE STATE LISTED..........135 2 ACRONYMS APHIS Animal and Plant Health Inspection Service AQDO Aquaculture Depredation Order AVMA American Veterinary Medical Association BBS Breeding Bird Survey BDM Bird Damage Management CBC Christmas Bird Count CEQ Council on Environmental Quality CFR Code of Federal Regulations CSA Cooperative Service Agreement EA Environmental Assessment EIS Environmental Impact Statement EPA U.S. Environmental Protection Agency ESA Endangered Species Act FAA Federal Aviation Administration FDA Food and Drug Administration FEIS Final Environmental Impact Statement FIFRA Federal Insecticide, Fungicide, and Rodenticide Act FONSI Finding of No Significant Impact FR Federal Register FY Fiscal Year IWDM Integrated Wildlife Damage Management LGLSP Lower Great Lakes/St. Lawrence Plain MA Methyl Anthranilate MANEM Mid-Atlantic / New England / Maritimes MBTA Migratory Bird Treaty Act MOU Memorandum of Understanding NAS National Audubon Society NASS National Agricultural Statistics Service NEPA National Environmental Policy Act NHPA National Historic Preservation Act NWRC National Wildlife Research Center PIF Partners in Flight PRDO Public Resource Depredation Order ROD Record of Decision SOP Standard Operating Procedure T&E Threatened and Endangered USC United States Code USDA U.S. Department of Agriculture USFWS U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service VAAFM Vermont Agency of Agriculture, Food & Markets VFWD Vermont Fish and Wildlife Department VDH Vermont Department of Health VOGA Vermont Outdoor Guide Association WS Wildlife Services 3 CHAPTER 1: PURPOSE AND NEED FOR ACTION 1.1 INTRODUCTION Across the United States, wildlife habitat has been substantially changed as human populations expand and land is used for human needs. These human uses and needs often compete with the needs of wildlife which increases the potential for conflicting human/wildlife interactions. This Environmental Assessment (EA) evaluates the potential environmental effects of alternatives for WS involvement in bird damage management (BDM) in Vermont. Wildlife damage management (WDM) is the science of reducing damage or other problems associated with wildlife, and is recognized as an integral part of wildlife management (The Wildlife Society 2010). The U.S. Department of Agriculture (USDA), Animal and Plant Health Inspection Service (APHIS), Wildlife Services (WS) program is the federal agency authorized to protect American resources from damage associated with wildlife (the Act of March 2, 1931 (46 Stat. 1468; 7 U.S.C. 426-426b) as amended, and the Act of December 22, 1987 (101 Stat. 1329-331, 7 U.S.C. 426c)). Human/wildlife conflict issues are complicated by the wide range of public responses to wildlife and wildlife damage. What may be unacceptable damage to one person may be a normal cost of living with nature to someone else. An individual person will have a unique definition of damage. However, the use of the term “damage” will consistently be used to describe situations where the individual person has determined the losses associated with wildlife is actual damage requiring assistance (i.e., has reached an individual threshold). WS’ activities are conducted to prevent or reduce wildlife damage to agricultural, industrial and natural resources, property, livestock, and threats to public health and safety on private and public lands in cooperation with federal, state and local agencies, tribes, private organizations, and individuals. The WS program uses an integrated wildlife damage management (IWDM) approach (WS Directive 2.1051) in which a combination of methods may be used or recommended to reduce wildlife damage. These methods may include non-lethal techniques like alteration of cultural practices, habitat management, repellents, frightening devices, and physical exclusion to prevent or reduce damage. The reduction of wildlife damage may also require removal of individual animals, reducing the local animal populations through lethal means. In some instances, the goal may be to eradicate an invasive species. Program activities are not based on punishing offending animals but are conducted to reduce damage and risks to human and livestock health and safety, and are used as part of the WS Decision Model (Slate et al. 1992). WS is a cooperatively funded, service-oriented program that receives requests for assistance with wildlife damage management from private and public entities, including tribes and other governmental agencies. As requested, WS cooperates with land and wildlife management agencies to reduce wildlife damage effectively and efficiently in accordance with applicable federal, state, and local laws and Memoranda of Understanding (MOUs) between WS and other agencies. WS chose to prepare this EA to facilitate planning, interagency coordination and the streamlining of program management, and to clearly communicate with the public the analysis of individual and cumulative impacts. In addition, this EA has been prepared to evaluate and determine if there are any potentially significant or cumulative impacts from the proposed damage management program. 1The WS Policy Manual (http://www.aphis.usda.gov/wildlifedamage) provides guidance for WS personnel to conduct wildlife damage management activities through Program Directives. WS Directives referenced in this EA can be found in the manual but will not be referenced in the Literature Cited Appendix. 4 1.2 PURPOSE The purpose of this EA is to evaluate cumulatively the individual projects conducted by WS and the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (USFWS) in Vermont to manage damage and threats to agricultural resources, property, natural resources, and threats to humans associated with the bird species listed in Appendix C. This EA will assist in determining if the proposed management of bird damage could have a significant impact on the human environment based on previous activities conducted and based on the anticipation of receiving additional requests for assistance. Because the goals of WS and the USFWS are to conduct a coordinated program in accordance with plans and objectives developed to reduce damage, and because those goals and objectives are to provide
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Reach 22- Kill Van Kull
    REACH 22- KILL VAN KULL Location: Kill Van Kull, from Old Place Creek to Bard Ave., including Shooter’s Island Upland Neighborhoods: Arlington, Old Place, Graniteville, Mariners’ Harbor, Port Richmond, Livingston Manor, West New Brighton Neighborhood Strategies Reachwide Mariners Harbor Waterfront 2 • Coordinate with Community Board 1’s eff orts to designate • Use publicly owned land at Van Pelt/Van Name Ave. to a North Shore multi-purpose pathway, along the waterfront provide open space with views of Shooters Island. where feasible, from Snug Harbor to the Goethals Bridge • Facilitate maritime expansion on underutilized sites. connecting points of historic, cultural, recreational and • Recruit industrial users and maritime training facility to maritime interest. historic industrial buildings. • Strengthen east-west transportation connections by • Permit and recruit commercial amenities along Richmond making targeted intersection improvements, utilizing bus Terrace frontage and in reused historic buildings. priority service on key routes and creating safe pedestrian • Provide safe pedestrian crossings at future parks. connections along Richmond Terrace and to the waterfront. • In coordination with the MTA North Shore Alternatives Analysis, resolve the confl icts between the former rail line, businesses and public spaces by relocating parts of the ROW Bayonne Bridge 3 and identifying underutilized lots that could support future transit. • Support raising the bridge’s roadway to increase its • Incorporate educational opportunities on the history of the clearance to accommodate larger ships (with consideration North Shore in coordination with new public waterfront of sea level rise), retain bicycle and pedestrian access, and access. consider future transit access. • Investigate using street-ends as public overlooks of maritime activity.
    [Show full text]
  • Niche Overlap Among Anglers, Fishers and Cormorants and Their Removals
    Fisheries Research 238 (2021) 105894 Contents lists available at ScienceDirect Fisheries Research journal homepage: www.elsevier.com/locate/®shres Niche overlap among anglers, fishersand cormorants and their removals of fish biomass: A case from brackish lagoon ecosystems in the southern Baltic Sea Robert Arlinghaus a,b,*, Jorrit Lucas b, Marc Simon Weltersbach c, Dieter Komle¨ a, Helmut M. Winkler d, Carsten Riepe a,c, Carsten Kühn e, Harry V. Strehlow c a Department of Biology and Ecology of Fishes, Leibniz Institute of Freshwater Ecology and Inland Fisheries, Müggelseedamm 310, 12587, Berlin, Germany b Division of Integrative Fisheries Management, Faculty of Life Sciences, Humboldt-Universitat¨ zu Berlin, Invalidenstrasse 42, 10115, Berlin, Germany c Thünen Institute of Baltic Sea Fisheries, Alter Hafen Süd 2, 18069, Rostock, Germany d General and Specific Zoology, Institute of Biological Sciences, University of Rostock, Rostock, Germany e Mecklenburg-Vorpommern Research Centre for Agriculture and Fisheries, Institute of Fisheries, Fischerweg 408, 18069, Rostock, Germany ARTICLE INFO ABSTRACT Handled by Steven X. Cadrin We used time series, diet studies and angler surveys to examine the potential for conflict in brackish lagoon fisheries of the southern Baltic Sea in Germany, specifically focusing on interactions among commercial and Keywords: recreational fisheries as well as fisheries and cormorants (Phalacrocorax carbo sinensis). For the time period Fish-eating wildlife between 2011 and 2015, commercial fisheries were responsible for the largest total fish biomass extraction Commercial fisheries (5,300 t per year), followed by cormorants (2,394 t per year) and recreational fishers (966 t per year). Com­ Human dimensions mercial fishing dominated the removals of most marine and diadromous fish, specifically herring (Clupea Conflicts Recreational fisheries harengus), while cormorants dominated the biomass extraction of smaller-bodied coastal freshwater fish, spe­ cifically perch (Perca fluviatilis) and roach (Rutilus rutilus).
    [Show full text]
  • Crop Diversification Leads to Diverse Bird Problems in Hawaiian Agriculture
    Human–Wildlife Confl icts 1(2):235–243, Fall 2007 Crop diversifi cation leads to diverse bird problems in Hawaiian agriculture MARNI E. KOOPMAN1, Hawaii Field Station, USDA/APHIS/Wildlife Services’ National Wildlife Re- search Center, P.O. Box 10880, Hilo, Hawaii 96721, USA [email protected] WILLIAM C. PITT, Hawaii Field Station, USDA/APHIS/Wildlife Services’ National Wildlife Research Center, P.O. Box 10880, Hilo, Hawaii 96721, USA Abstract: Over the last 20 years, Hawaii’s agriculture has shifted from a focus on sugar cane (Saccharum offi cinarum) and pineapples (Ananas comosus) produced on large farms to a diverse array of products produced on a multitude of smaller farms. This dramatic shift in production, in addition to the introduction of many new avian species, has resulted in a concomitant change in the problems faced by agriculture. We surveyed farmers to determine the extent of bird damage to crops, the species responsible, the crops most vulnerable, and control methods employed. Bird problems varied by island, but cardinals (Cardinalis cardinalis, Paroaria coronata, and P. capitata) and pheasants (Phasianus colchicus and Lophura leucomelanos) were signifi cant problems on all islands. Seed corn (Zea mays), fruit, vegetables, rice (Oryza sativa), and orchids (Orchidaceae) all sustained notable damage to their crops by birds, and growers expressed much interest in gaining information on control measures. Most farmers incurred little damage, while a few reported losing 80 to 100% of their crops at certain times of the year. We recommend a multidimensional approach to control invasive bird species, including habitat alterations, scare tactics, cessation of game bird releases, prevention of the spread of known pests among islands, and the development of chemical repellents for use when other methods are not suffi cient.
    [Show full text]
  • Citizen Trade Policy Commission Friday January 25, 2008 Room 206, Cross State Office Building
    Citizen Trade Policy Commission Friday January 25, 2008 Room 206, Cross State Office Building 9:00 A.M. Commission Business Meeting Meeting Summary Members present: Sen. Margaret Rotundo, Senate Chair, Rep. John Patrick, House Chair, Sen. Kevin Raye, Sen. Bruce Bryant, , Rep. Jeffery Gifford, Elise Flemings, Michael Burson , John Palmer, Leslie Manning, Wade Merritt, Sarah Bigney, Malcolm Burson, Paul Volckhausen, Wade Merritt, and John Palmer Guest Speakers: Peter Riggs, Forum on Democracy & Trade; and Kaye Wilkie, Chair, Intergovernmental Policy Advisory Committee, and as Director of International Policy, New York State, Department of Economic Development Staff present: Curtis Bentley, Legislative Analyst and Judy Gopaul. I. Colombia Free Trade Agreement – Peter Riggs discussed the politics, pros and cons of the Colombia FTA. (See Attachment). Mr. Riggs thought that the president would send the bill to Congress sometime in March, however, he felt that there was not much support for the agreement. Kay Wilkie gave a brief history of IGPAC, her role in the IGPAC. She also spoke about the Antigua internet-gambling case. Ms. Wilkie also gave her view on the agreement, that the majority of the provisions in the Colombia FTA were similar to NAFTA – not a fair agreement. She suggested that states should engage in the free trade policy process, think proactively about how states can build capacity to influence federal policy. II. Action to be taken: The Commission agreed to delay their decision and vote on the Colombia FTA until they had an opportunity to hear testimony from Maine citizens at the public hearing on February 21st, 2008. It was agreed that the commission would meet after the public hearing to discuss and vote on what action should be taken – whether to send a letter with the commission’s and Maine citizen concerns to the Maine delegates and Governor Baldacci.
    [Show full text]
  • Featured Hiking and Biking Trails
    Lake Awosting, Minnewaska State Park State Minnewaska Awosting, Lake View from Balsam Mountain Balsam from View Bluestone Wild Forest Forest Wild Wild Bluestone Bluestone Hudson Hudson the the Over Over Walkway Walkway Trails Biking Biking Hiking and Mohonk Mountain House House Mountain Mohonk Featured Reservoir Ashokan Hudson River Towns & Cities 6 Falling Waters Preserve (Town of Saugerties) 12 Mohonk Preserve Approximately two miles of varied trails exist on this 149-acre preserve. The trails (Towns of Rochester, Rosendale, Marbletown) 1 Walkway Over the Hudson & Hudson Valley are an excellent place to explore the rugged beauty of the Hudson River, while Located just north of Minnewaska Park, Mohonk Preserve is New York State’s Rail Trail hiking atop rock ledges that slant precipitously into the water. The 0.65-mile largest visitor- and member-supported nature preserve with 165,000 annual (Hamlet of Highland, Town of Lloyd) white-blazed Riverside Trail hugs the river and offers great views. The 0.9-mile visitors and 8,000 protected acres of cliffs, forests, fields, ponds and streams. The Walkway Over the Hudson (Walkway), the longest-elevated pedestrian walkway red-blazed Upland Trail affords views of the Catskills and a picturesque waterfall. Named one of the five best city escapes nationwide by Outside magazine, Mohonk in the world, spans the Hudson River between Poughkeepsie and Highland and links www.scenichudson.org/parks/fallingwaters Preserve maintains over 70 miles of carriage roads and 40 miles of trails for together an 18-mile rail trail network on both sides of the Hudson. Connected to the Saugerties Lighthouse Trail (Village of Saugerties) hiking, cycling, trail running, cross-country skiing, snowshoeing, and horseback 7 riding along the Shawangunk Mountains.
    [Show full text]
  • The Energy Sector an Investment in the People and Communities of Atlantic Canada
    The Energy Sector An Investment in the People and Communities of Atlantic Canada January 2008 The Energy Sector An Investment in the People North America needs energy and Canada, and Communities of Atlantic the United States and Mexico want to find it closer to home. These twin needs of Canada increasing demand and increased security have created a unique opportunity for On the doorstep of a growing Atlantic Canada that could drive job market 2 creation, community development and Distance between Atlantic Canada’s investment in the region well into the next major centres and the ports decade and beyond. of Boston and New York (chart) 3 Oil, natural gas and electricity; Atlantic Atlantic Canada’s energy mix 3 Canada develops and delivers all three major forms of energy for its own communities Projects and players in Atlantic and for export around the continent to be Canada’s energy sector 5 used as heat, fuel and power in homes and New Brunswick 5 businesses. Over the last few decades, the Nova Scotia 6 Atlantic Canadian energy industry has laid Newfoundland and Labrador 8 the foundation for what has become one of Prince Edward Island 9 the most significant sectors in the regional economy, and, increasingly, one of the most Exporting energy resources; diverse with its mix of traditional thermal importing human resources 10 and hydroelectric generation with newer technology such as nuclear, wind, bioenergy and tidal. Matching people and skill sets 12 Occupations that will be required by the Atlantic Canadian On the doorstep of a growing energy sector over the next decade market (chart) 12 Energy accounts for just over half of all exports from Atlantic Canada and it now Engaging in all aspects of stands poised to significantly increase its community life 13 reach.
    [Show full text]
  • Most Popular Hikes
    MOST POPULAR HIKES Hikers will enjoy panoramic mountain vistas along the many hiking Kaaterskill Falls – Highest cascading waterfall in NYS trails in the Great Northern Catskills. Rip Van Winkle Monument – Larger-than-life Blue stone carving Acra Point and Batavia Kill Loop at the top of Hunter Mountain Kaaterskill Falls/Viewing Platform (Moderate to Difficult: 5.3-mile circuit) (Easy to Moderate: 1.4 miles, round trip) Affords breathtaking views of the Black Dome Range. Escarpment Trail, Windham Trailhead At 260 feet, this two-tiered fall is the highest cascading Enjoy scenery of the Hudson Valley from the summit (Moderate to Difficult: 23-mile circuit) waterfall in New York State. The spectacular waterfall before descending along the Batavia Kill. Trailhead The trail offers challenging terrain over ever changing attracted tourists, painters and poets when it was first located on Big Hollow Road (County Route 56) in scenery with mixed hardwood forests, dark hemlock publicized in the early 1800s. Scenic marked hiking Maplecrest. groves along swift-flowing creeks and a spruce-fir cap trails with views of the Kaaterskill Clove. Trailhead for on the higher peaks. Trailhead located on Route 23 the bottom located on Route 23A in Haines Falls (west Devil’s Path in East Windham. of Horse Shoe Bend). The viewing platform, which is (Difficult: 24.15 mile trail) handicapped accessible, is located at the end of Laurel Described as the toughest and most dangerous hiking Hunter Mountain Fire Tower House Lane off County Route 18 in Haines Falls. trail in the Eastern United States, the Devil’s Path is (Moderate to Difficult: 8 miles, round trip) one of the most popular in the Catskill Park.
    [Show full text]
  • How to Get Here by Ferry –
    How to get here by Ferry THE CAT Discover what’s beyond the horizon the way explorers always have. By sea. The high-speed CAT ferry will take you between Portland, Maine and Yarmouth, Nova Scotia in just 5.5 hours. At half the driving time, you’ll have even more of an opportunity to explore the beauty beyond the horizon. And with plenty of onboard amenities and a knowledgeable staff and crew, your journey will be more than just fast, it will be an experience you’ll never forget. There’s no more beautiful backdrop for a coastal getaway, and no better way to get there than The CAT. The Fundy Rose Take an unforgettable journey across the Bay of Fundy in comfort & style! Welcome aboard Fundy Rose, with daily crossings between Digby, Nova Scotia and Saint John, New Brunswick. Fundy Rose transports all types of vehicles as well as walk-on passengers and four-legged friends. With a crossing time of just 2 hours, 15 minutes, you’ll arrive at your destination rested and ready for adventure. The Fundy Rose also offers daytime sailings and a host of new and improved amenities. Relax in a spacious outdoor seating and viewing area, pop by Mid Ship Café and the Crow’s Nest, or visit the Acadia Eatery for a bite to eat. Catch up in the Business Centre with complimentary Wi-Fi, watch live entertainment (on scheduled occasions), or catch the latest flick. There’s even a children’s play area, and animal shelter—everyone is taken care of on Fundy Rose! Northumberland Ferries The way Atlantic Canada was meant to be explored—by sea.
    [Show full text]
  • Review of the Population Status and Management of Double-Crested Cormorants in Ontario" (1997)
    University of Nebraska - Lincoln DigitalCommons@University of Nebraska - Lincoln Symposium on Double-Crested Cormorants: Population Status and Management Issues in USDA National Wildlife Research Center the Midwest Symposia December 1997 Review of the Population Status and Management of Double- Crested Cormorants in Ontario C. Korfanty W.G. Miyasaki J.L. Harcus Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.unl.edu/nwrccormorants Part of the Ornithology Commons Korfanty, C. ; Miyasaki, W.G.; and Harcus, J.L., "Review of the Population Status and Management of Double-Crested Cormorants in Ontario" (1997). Symposium on Double-Crested Cormorants: Population Status and Management Issues in the Midwest. 14. https://digitalcommons.unl.edu/nwrccormorants/14 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the USDA National Wildlife Research Center Symposia at DigitalCommons@University of Nebraska - Lincoln. It has been accepted for inclusion in Symposium on Double- Crested Cormorants: Population Status and Management Issues in the Midwest by an authorized administrator of DigitalCommons@University of Nebraska - Lincoln. Symposium on Double-Crested Cormorants 130 Population Status and Management of Double-Crested Cormorants in Ontario Review of the Population Status and Management of Double-Crested Cormorants in Ontario By C. Korfanty, W. G. Miyasaki, and J. L. Harcus Abstract: We prepared this review of the status and pairs on the Canadian Great Lakes in 1997, with increasing management of double-crested cormorants (Phalacrocorax numbers found on inland water bodies. Double-crested auritus) in Ontario, with management options, in response to cormorants are protected in Ontario, and there are no concerns expressed about possible negative impacts of large population control programs.
    [Show full text]
  • Double-Crested Cormorant Conflict Management and Research on Leech Lake 2005 Annual Report
    Double-crested Cormorant Conflict Management And Research On Leech Lake 2005 Annual Report Prepared by Leech Lake Band of Ojibwe Division of Resources Management Minnesota Department of Natural Resources US Department of Agriculture Wildlife Services Photo by Steve Mortensen This report summarizes cormorant conflict management and research that occurred on Leech Lake during 2005. The overall goal of this project is to determine at what level cormorant numbers can be managed for on the lake without having a significant negative effect on gamefish and on other species of colonial waterbirds that nest alongside cormorants on Little Pelican Island. Work conducted this summer went much better than anticipated and we are well on the way towards resolving cormorant conflict issues on Leech Lake. Cormorant Management Environmental Assessment An environmental assessment (EA) was prepared that gathered and evaluated information on cormorants and their effects on fish and other resources. We compiled, considered, and incorporated input from all parties that have an interest or concern about the proposed controlling of cormorants on Leech Lake. This document could have been written specifically so the Leech Lake Band could address the Leech Lake cormorant colony, but it was decided to prepare it as a joint effort between LLBO Division of Resources Management (DRM) and USDA Wildlife Services (WS), MN Department of Natural Resources (MN DNR), and US Fish and Wildlife Service (FWS). WS served as lead agency in this effort. By preparing it in this manner, it could be utilized by other agencies elsewhere in Minnesota if resource damage was documented. The EA proposed to reduce the Leech Lake colony more than 10% so, under provisions of the Federal Depredation Order, the Leech Lake Band submitted a request to the US Fish and Wildlife Service to go to a higher population reduction limit (reduction to 500 nests).
    [Show full text]
  • PIELC-2016-Broshure-For-Sure.Pdf
    WelcOME! Welcome to the Public Interest Environmental Law Conference (PIELC), the premier annual gathering for environmen- talists in the world! Now in its 34th year, PIELC unites thousands of activists, attorneys, students, scientists, and commu- nity members from over 50 countries to share their ideas, experience, and expertise. With keynote addresses, workshops, films, celebrations, and over 130 panels, PIELC is world-renowned for its energy, innovation, and inspiration. In 2011, PIELC received the Program of the Year Award from the American Bar Association Section of Environment, Energy, and Resources, and in 2013 PIELC received the American Bar Assoication Law Student Division’s Public Interest Award. PIELC 2016, A LEGacY WORTH LeaVING “A Legacy Worth Leaving” is a response to the drastic need of daily, direct action of individuals in their communities. Cohesive leadership models must acknowledge that individual participation directs society’s impact on interdependent community and global systems. Diversity of cultures, talents, and specialties must converge to guide community initiatives in a balanced system. Each has a unique role that can no longer be hindered by the complacent passive-participation models of traditional leadership schemes. Building community means being community. This year at PIELC, we will be exploring alternative methods of approaching current ecological, social, and cultural paradigms. First, by examining the past – let us not relive our mistakes. Then, by focusing on the present. Days to months, months to years, years to a lifetime; small acts compound to the life-story of a person, a place, a planet. What legacy are you leaving? WIFI GUEST ACCOUNT LOGIN INSTRUCTIONS 1) Connect to the “UOguest” wireless network (do NOT connect to the “UOwireless” network).
    [Show full text]
  • Most Popular Hikes
    Most Popular Hikes Rip Van Winkle Skywalk – Crossing over the Hudson River with views Rip Van Winkle Monument – Larger than life Blue stone carving Kaaterskill Falls – Highest cascading waterfall in NYS of the mountains and the Hudson River Valley at the top of Hunter Mountain Acra Point and Batavia Kill Loop Escarpment Trail, Windham Trailhead Plateau Mountain (via Warner Creek Trail) (Moderate to Difficult: 5.3-mile circuit) (Moderate to Difficult: 23-mile circuit) (Difficult: 8-mile circuit) Affords breathtaking views of the Black Dome Range. Enjoy The trail offers challenging terrain over ever changing scenery Perfect for avid climbers and hikers, both scenic and rugged. scenery of the Hudson Valley from the summit before descending with mixed hardwood forests, dark hemlock groves along swift- The trail intersects with the Devil’s Path and offers views of along the Batavia Kill. Trailhead located on Big Hollow Road flowing creeks and a spruce-fir cap on the higher peaks. Trailhead Kaaterskill High Peak and Hunter Mountain. Trailhead located (County Route 56) in Maplecrest. located on Route 23 in East Windham. on Notch Inn Road (off Route 214) in Hunter. Devil’s Path Hunter Mountain Fire Tower Pratt Rock (Difficult: 24.15 miles) (Moderate to Difficult: 8 miles, round trip) (Difficult: 3.1 miles, round trip) Described as the toughest and most dangerous hiking trail in the One of the Catskills’ iconic hikes located on the summit of The climb to the rock is steep, and may be unfit for young Eastern United States, the Devil’s Path is one of the most popular Hunter Mountain.
    [Show full text]