The Turner Diaries; Robbed & Counterfeited, Bombed Theaters & Synagogues, Killed Radio Host Alan Berg in 1984
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Load more
Recommended publications
-
20 Years Later: a Look Back at the Unabomber Manifesto by Brett A
PERSPECTIVES ON TERRORISM Volume 9, Issue 6 20 Years Later: A Look Back at the Unabomber Manifesto by Brett A. Barnett Abstract On September 19, 1995, The New York Times and The Washington Post submitted to “Unabomber” Theodore Kaczynski’s demand to publish his manifesto, a treatise that would come to be known as the “Unabomber Manifesto.” While Kaczynski has been serving a life sentence for the letter-bombing campaign that he perpetrated between 1979 and 1995, the radical environmentalist rhetoric contained within his manifesto has become available to an even wider audience of current and would-be environmental extremists than when it was first published. Given its availability online, the Unabomber Manifesto has become one of the most well-known rhetorical artifacts endorsing environmental extremism. Using Herbert Simons’ “rhetorical requirements” approach, this study demonstrates that the Unabomber Manifesto represents Kaczynski’s rhetorical efforts to animate like-minded environmental extremists. The article concludes by discussing how the Unabomber Manifesto resonated with some radical environmentalists and may have even served as a catalyst for later acts committed by U.S.-based environmental extremists. By utilizing a framework for examining the rhetoric of violent revolutionary social movements, this study provides further insight into what motivates environmental extremists of today. Keywords: Unabomber Manifesto; eco-terrorism; environmental extremists; radical environmentalists; rhetorical analysis Introduction etween 1979 -
The Radical Roots of the Alt-Right
Gale Primary Sources Start at the source. The Radical Roots of the Alt-Right Josh Vandiver Ball State University Various source media, Political Extremism and Radicalism in the Twentieth Century EMPOWER™ RESEARCH The radical political movement known as the Alt-Right Revolution, and Evolian Traditionalism – for an is, without question, a twenty-first century American audience. phenomenon.1 As the hipster-esque ‘alt’ prefix 3. A refined and intensified gender politics, a suggests, the movement aspires to offer a youthful form of ‘ultra-masculinism.’ alternative to conservatism or the Establishment Right, a clean break and a fresh start for the new century and .2 the Millennial and ‘Z’ generations While the first has long been a feature of American political life (albeit a highly marginal one), and the second has been paralleled elsewhere on the Unlike earlier radical right movements, the Alt-Right transnational right, together the three make for an operates natively within the political medium of late unusual fusion. modernity – cyberspace – because it emerged within that medium and has been continuously shaped by its ongoing development. This operational innovation will Seminal Alt-Right figures, such as Andrew Anglin,4 continue to have far-reaching and unpredictable Richard Spencer,5 and Greg Johnson,6 have been active effects, but researchers should take care to precisely for less than a decade. While none has continuously delineate the Alt-Right’s broader uniqueness. designated the movement as ‘Alt-Right’ (including Investigating the Alt-Right’s incipient ideology – the Spencer, who coined the term), each has consistently ferment of political discourses, images, and ideas with returned to it as demarcating the ideological territory which it seeks to define itself – one finds numerous they share. -
How White Supremacy Returned to Mainstream Politics
GETTY CORUM IMAGES/SAMUEL How White Supremacy Returned to Mainstream Politics By Simon Clark July 2020 WWW.AMERICANPROGRESS.ORG How White Supremacy Returned to Mainstream Politics By Simon Clark July 2020 Contents 1 Introduction and summary 4 Tracing the origins of white supremacist ideas 13 How did this start, and how can it end? 16 Conclusion 17 About the author and acknowledgments 18 Endnotes Introduction and summary The United States is living through a moment of profound and positive change in attitudes toward race, with a large majority of citizens1 coming to grips with the deeply embedded historical legacy of racist structures and ideas. The recent protests and public reaction to George Floyd’s murder are a testament to many individu- als’ deep commitment to renewing the founding ideals of the republic. But there is another, more dangerous, side to this debate—one that seeks to rehabilitate toxic political notions of racial superiority, stokes fear of immigrants and minorities to inflame grievances for political ends, and attempts to build a notion of an embat- tled white majority which has to defend its power by any means necessary. These notions, once the preserve of fringe white nationalist groups, have increasingly infiltrated the mainstream of American political and cultural discussion, with poi- sonous results. For a starting point, one must look no further than President Donald Trump’s senior adviser for policy and chief speechwriter, Stephen Miller. In December 2019, the Southern Poverty Law Center’s Hatewatch published a cache of more than 900 emails2 Miller wrote to his contacts at Breitbart News before the 2016 presidential election. -
2014 Thomson Reuters. No Claim to Original US Government Works
Bloom, Sarah 10/14/2014 For Educational Use Only U.S. v. Parr, 545 F.3d 491 (2008) 545 F.3d 491 Affirmed in part, vacated in part, and remanded for United States Court of Appeals, resentencing. Seventh Circuit. UNITED STATES of America, Attorneys and Law Firms Plaintiff–Appellee, Cross–Appellant, v. *493 Steven M. Biskupic (argued), Michelle L. Jacobs, Steven J. PARR, Defendant– Office of the United States Attorney, Milwaukee, WI, for Plaintiff–Appellee, Cross–Appellant. Appellant, Cross–Appellee. Abner J. Mikva, Abner J. Mikva, Jason Huber (argued), Nos. 06–3300, 06–3457. | Argued Mandel Legal Aid Clinic, Chicago, IL, for Defendant– Sept. 7, 2007. | Decided Sept. 18, 2008. Appellant, Cross–Appellee. Synopsis Before BAUER, POSNER, and SYKES, Circuit Judges. Background: Following denial of defendant's motion to suppress, 2006 WL 689133, and his motion for judgment of Opinion acquittal, 2006 WL 1896391, he was convicted in the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Wisconsin, SYKES, Circuit Judge. William C. Griesbach, J., for threatening to use a weapon of mass destruction against a federal government building and Steven Parr was convicted of threatening to use a weapon of was sentenced to 10 years in prison. mass destruction against a federal government building and was sentenced to 10 years in prison. See 18 U.S.C. § 2332a(a) (3) & (a). On appeal, Parr argues that he was convicted for conduct protected by the First Amendment and that the Holdings: The Court of Appeals, Sykes, Circuit Judge, held district court abused its discretion in allowing the jury to that: hear evidence of his extensive background relating *494 to bomb-making and his fascination with domestic terrorism. -
The Heuristic Squelch • September 2020
1 The Heuristic Squelch • September 2020 The Heuristic SQUELCH Cracking cold cases since 1991 EDITORS (narrating in the rain) Joseph Cohn, David Larson, Matthew Selman EDITORS EMERITUS (pouring another whiskey) Siddharth Bhogra, Simona Boneva, Lena Brooks, Aaron Brownstein, Hoodrow Currie, Amy Detrich, Max Ebert, Tejomay Gadgil, Simon Ganz, Brett Hallahan, David Hollingsworth, Owen Javellana, Sean Keane, Erik Krasner- Karpen, Elizabeth Kurata, Matt Loker, Spencer Nyarady, John O’Connor, Rebecca Power, Graham Riley, Kait Schultz, Miles Stenehjem, Tommaso Sciortino, Fred Taylor-Hochberg, Joshua Zarrabi WRITERS (chasing red herrings) Drew Bernhard, Max Bograd, Tejas Dhindsa, Hans Gundlach, Meagan Helm, Landon Iannamico, Nessa Ordukhani, Ankita Sethi, Lindy Tweten CONTRIBUTORS (wearing trenchcoats) Jazz Mackey, Chase McCleary, Melody Niv, forgot that one guy COME JOIN THE WEBMASTER (burying the bodies) squelch Simon Ganz PRINTING MEETINGS: (playing saxophone down a dark SUNDAY, 3-5 PM alleyway) Fricke Parks (510) 489-6543 TUESDSAY, 8-10 PM EMAIL US FOR A ZOOM INVITE The Heuristic Squelch is an ASUC sponsored publication of UC Berkeley. The content contained herein does EMAIL US AT: not necessarily reflect the opinions of [email protected] the ASUC, nor does it re-reflect the opinions of the ASUC nor does it re- re-reflectthe opinions of the ASUC nor INSTAGRAM: does it flect the opinions of the ASUC. @THEHEURISTICSQUELCH 2 The Heuristic Squelch • September 2020 table of contents words from the top Dear Reader, 4 newsflashes Well that was weird. Some grinning dork on Sproul just harassed you into taking a magazine that you don’t want 6 obscure sorrows to read. Or even more strange, you picked up the magazine yourself. -
Irving V. Penguin UK and Deborah Lipstadt: Building a Defense
Nova Law Review Volume 27, Issue 2 2002 Article 3 Irving v. Penguin UK and Deborah Lipstadt: Building a Defense Deborah Lipstadt∗ ∗ Copyright c 2002 by the authors. Nova Law Review is produced by The Berkeley Electronic Press (bepress). https://nsuworks.nova.edu/nlr Lipstadt: Irving v. Penguin UK and Deborah Lipstadt: Building a Defense Irving v. Penguin UK and Deborah Lipstadt: Building a Defense Strategy, an Essay by Deborah Lipstadt In September 1996, I received a letter from the British publisher of my book, Denying the Holocaust: The Growing Assault on Truth and Memory,' informing me that David Irving had filed a Statement of Case with the Royal High Court in London indicating his intention to sue me for libel for calling him a Holocaust denier in my book. 2 When I first learned of his plans to do this, I was surprised. Irving had called the Holocaust a "legend." In 1988, the Canadian government had charged a German emigre, Ernst Ztndel, with promoting Holocaust denial. Irving, who had testified on behalf of the defense at this trial, told the court that there was no "overall Reich policy to kill the Jews," that "no documents whatsoever show that a Holocaust had * Dr. Deborah E. Lipstadt is Dorot Professor of Modem Jewish and Holocaust Studies at Emory University in Atlanta where she directs the Institute for Jewish Studies. Her book DENYING THE HOLOCAUST: THE GROWING ASSAULT ON TRUTH AND MEMORY (1993) and is the first full length study of those who attempt to deny the Holocaust. She recently decisively won a libel trial in London against David Irving, who sued her for calling him a Holocaust denier and right wing extremist in her book. -
Transnational Neo-Nazism in the Usa, United Kingdom and Australia
TRANSNATIONAL NEO-NAZISM IN THE USA, UNITED KINGDOM AND AUSTRALIA PAUL JACKSON February 2020 JACKSON | PROGRAM ON EXTREMISM About the Program on About the Author Extremism Dr Paul Jackson is a historian of twentieth century and contemporary history, and his main teaching The Program on Extremism at George and research interests focus on understanding the Washington University provides impact of radical and extreme ideologies on wider analysis on issues related to violent and societies. Dr. Jackson’s research currently focuses non-violent extremism. The Program on the dynamics of neo-Nazi, and other, extreme spearheads innovative and thoughtful right ideologies, in Britain and Europe in the post- academic inquiry, producing empirical war period. He is also interested in researching the work that strengthens extremism longer history of radical ideologies and cultures in research as a distinct field of study. The Britain too, especially those linked in some way to Program aims to develop pragmatic the extreme right. policy solutions that resonate with Dr. Jackson’s teaching engages with wider themes policymakers, civic leaders, and the related to the history of fascism, genocide, general public. totalitarian politics and revolutionary ideologies. Dr. Jackson teaches modules on the Holocaust, as well as the history of Communism and fascism. Dr. Jackson regularly writes for the magazine Searchlight on issues related to contemporary extreme right politics. He is a co-editor of the Wiley- Blackwell journal Religion Compass: Modern Ideologies and Faith. Dr. Jackson is also the Editor of the Bloomsbury book series A Modern History of Politics and Violence. The views expressed in this paper are solely those of the author, and not necessarily those of the Program on Extremism or the George Washington University. -
White Supremacy Search Trends in the United States
01 / WHITE SUPREMACY SEARCH TRENDS IN THE UNITED STATES White Supremacy Search Trends in the United States June 2021 02 / WHITE SUPREMACY SEARCH TRENDS IN THE UNITED STATES ! Warning This report contains racist and violent extremist language and other content that readers may find distressing. 03 / WHITE SUPREMACY SEARCH TRENDS IN THE UNITED STATES Contents 04 Introduction 05-06 Crisis Response 07-16 Search Insights 07-09 What Did Americans Search For? 10-11 Where Did Americans Consume Extremist Content? 12 What Were the Most Popular Forums and Websites? 13 What Extremist Literature Did Americans Search For? 14 What Extremist Merchandise Did Americans Search For? 14-15 What Extremist Groups Did Americans Search For? 16 Who Searched for Extremist Content? 17-20 Appendix A: Keyword Descriptions 04 / WHITE SUPREMACY SEARCH TRENDS IN THE UNITED STATES Introduction Moonshot partnered with the Anti-Defamation League (ADL) to analyze US search traffic in July 2020 in response to the threats posed by white supremacist narratives and ideology in the US this past year. The dominant socio-political events of 2020-2021—the COVID-19 pandemic, the widespread BLM protests and counter-protests, and the presidential election—coalesced to create fertile ground for white supremacists and other violent extremist movements to mobilize and recruit. In 2020, racism and systemic racial inequality took center stage in the American public eye, with nationwide mass protests against recent police killings of Black people and historic evidence of racial injustice.1 -
Romania Probes Hundreds of Books Written by Prisoners Yahoo News
25/01/2016 Romania probes hundreds of books written by prisoners Yahoo News Romania probes What to read next hundreds of books written by prisoners By ALISON MUTLER 33 minutes ago Photo Of Kim Kardashian Leaves Fans ˠ ➕ ✕ Concerned Alison Coldridge Letters from a serial killer: Inside the Unabomber archive Yahoo News BUCHAREST, Romania (AP) — Romania's crackdown on corruption and fraud in recent years has created a sudden and unexpected literary boom, as prisoners publish hundreds of non fiction books on subjects as varied as soccer, real estate, God and gemstones. Everyone On The Internet Made Fun Of The Patriots After The AFC Championship It's quite a feat for inmates with no access to books or the UPROXX Internet, often without tables in their cells. Reports that one book, of 212 pages, was written in seven hours, has only increased suspicions that the improbable treatises are often ghostwritten or plagiarized. Under Romanian law, prisoners can have their sentences reduced by 30 days for every "scientific work" they publish, subject to a judge's decision on whether the book merits it. Prisoners pay publishing houses to print their works — though they won't be Mystery Solved: Reggie Wayne Reveals What Peyton Manning's 'Omaha' Audible found in any bookshop. UPROXXMeans The law dates from the communist era and was aimed at imprisoned intellectuals who were not suitable for manual labor. Skilled manual workers are able to work to reduce their sentences. Until recently only a handful of such books were published, but in 2014 that rose to 90 — and in 2015 it spiraled to 340. -
Testimony of Lecia Brooks Chief of Staff, Southern Poverty Law Center Before the Armed Services Committee United States House of Representatives
Testimony of Lecia Brooks Chief of Staff, Southern Poverty Law Center before the Armed Services Committee United States House of Representatives Extremism in the Armed Forces March 24, 2021 My name is Lecia Brooks. I am chief of staff of the Southern Poverty Law Center (SPLC). Thank you for the opportunity to present testimony on extremism in the U.S. Armed Forces and what we can do to address this challenge. Now in our 50th year, the SPLC is a catalyst for racial justice in the South and beyond, working in partnership with communities to dismantle white supremacy, strengthen intersectional movements, and advance the human rights of all people. SPLC lawyers have worked to shut down some of the nation’s most violent white supremacist groups by winning crushing, multimillion-dollar jury verdicts on behalf of their victims. We have helped dismantle vestiges of Jim Crow, reformed juvenile justice practices, shattered barriers to equality for women, children, the LGBTQ+ community, and the disabled, and worked to protect low-wage immigrant workers from exploitation. The SPLC began tracking white supremacist activity in the 1980s, during a resurgence of the Ku Klux Klan and other organized extremist hate groups. Today, the SPLC is the premier U.S. nonprofit organization monitoring the activities of domestic hate groups and other extremists. Each year since 1990, we have conducted a census of hate groups operating across America, a list that is used extensively by journalists, law enforcement agencies, and scholars, among others. The SPLC Action Fund is dedicated to fighting for racial justice alongside impacted communities in pursuit of equity and opportunity for all. -
An Examination of Ideology in Political Dystopia
Proceedings of the National Conference On Undergraduate Research (NCUR) 2020 Montana State University, Bozeman MT March 26-28, 2020 American Nightmare: An Examination of Ideology in Political Dystopia Grant Mooney Political Science University of Massachusetts – Dartmouth 285 Old Westport Road North Dartmouth, Massachusetts 02790 USA Faculty Advisor: Dr. Robert Darst Abstract This article will analyze the evolution of American political ideology through dystopian fiction. The works selected for this article run a wide range of books spanning from The Iron Heel by socialist Jack London (1907) to the openly fascist The Day of the Rope by Devon Stack (2018). This work will then use a blended approach of historical and political analysis to analyze each work for its overall ideology and how it fits into the larger American historical narrative. This process will look at four parts of each dystopian work: culture, government, sovereignty, and institutions. These attributes will be applied to the dystopian work to assess what the author presents as a danger and assess what alternatives they may present. These analyses will then be viewed considering the broader historical narrative to understand how they reflect American political ideology's overall evolution. Ultimately, in the examined works, several major patterns arose. First, authoritarianism is a significant feature of dystopian governments but is not exclusively dystopian. A recurring theme amongst fascist and reactionary authors is to present their dystopia as an authoritarian anti-White society while their utopia is a thinly veiled White supremacist state. Liberalism, concurrently, is also not viewed by most authors as a panacea. Left-leaning authors tend to condemn its free-market economic system as an entrance point for oligarchs and corrupt bankers. -
Tk-Technological-Slavery.Pdf
Full HTML transcripts of the book can be found at http://www.wildism.org/lib/item/a3ef9393/ 1 Techno1ogica1 S1avery He that hath no sword, let him sell his garment, and buy one. -Luke 22:36 - The Collected Writings of Theodore J. Kaczyr:ski, a.k. a. "The Ur:abomber" Technological Slavery is a revised and enlarged version of the book, RMd toRevolution, published in an English edition of 400 copies, and also in a Freneh edition in 2008 by �ditions Xenia of Vevey Switzerland. Technological Shvery © 2008 by Theodore J. Kaczynski Introduction © 2010 by Dr. David Skrbina All rights reserved. 10 9876 5432 1 Feral J-Jouse 1240 W. Sims Way, Suire 124 Port Townsend WA 98368 www.FcralHouse.com Design by Bill Smith To the memory of Joy Richards, with love. From tbe PUblisber Theodore J. Kaczynski has been convicted for illegally transporting, mailing, and using bombs, as well as killing two people in California and one in New Jersey. He is now serving a life sentence in the supermax prison in Florence, Colorado. Feral House has not published this book to justify the crimes committed by Mr. Kaczynski. But we do feel that there is a great deal oflegitimate thought in this book, and the First Amendment allows readers to judge whether or not this is the case. Tcchnophilcs like Ray Kurzweil and Bill Joy also expressed their regard for Theodore Kaczynski's writing: "Like many of my colleagues, I fe lt that I could easily have been the Unabombcr's next target. He is clearly a Luddite, but simply saying this does not dismiss his argument ...