Willi Baumeister International Willi Baumeister and European Modernity 1920S–1950S

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Willi Baumeister International Willi Baumeister and European Modernity 1920S–1950S Willi Baumeister International Willi Baumeister and European Modernity 1920s–1950s November 21, 2014 — March 29, 2015 Works by Willi Baumeister 1909–1955. Works from the Baumeister Collection by Josef Albers, Hans Arp, Julius Bissier, Georges Braques, Carlo Carrà, Marc Chagall, Albert Gleizes, Roberta González, Camille Graeser, Hans Hartung, Wassily Kandinsky, Paul Klee, Franz Krause, Le Corbusier, Fernand Léger, El Lissitzky, August Macke, Otto Meyer-Amden, Joan Miró, László Moholy-Nagy, Amédée Ozenfant, Pablo Picasso, Oskar Schlemmer, Kurt Schwitters, Michel Seuphor, Gino Severini, Zao Wou-Ki From the Daimler Art Collection: Hans Arp, Willi Baumeister, Max Bill, Camille Graeser, Otto Meyer-Amden, Oskar Schlemmer, Georges Vantongerloo Daimler Contemporary Berlin Potsdamer Platz Berlin Introduction Renate Wiehager Stuttgart artist Willi Baumeister (1889–1955) is one of the The collection comprises, among others, paintings by Wassily From the outset the Daimler Art Collection has, in both its most important German artists of the postwar period and Kandinsky, Hans Arp, Fernand Léger, and Kazimir Malevich. conception and its aims, gone well beyond mere corporate- among the most significant representatives of abstract paint- The focus of the exhibition is on central groups of works by image enhancement. In fact, over the years the collection ing. His influence as an avant-garde artist, as a professor at Willi Baumeister, ranging from his constructivist phase to the has become one of the leading European Corporate Collec- the School of Decorative Arts in Frankfurt am Main and after Mauerbilder and the late Montaru paintings as well as the tions and a living part of the corporation. Since it was inau- 1946 at the Stuttgart Academy, and as a major art theoreti- Afrika series. They offer an overview of the development of gurated in 1977 – with the acquisition of a picture by Willi cian could be felt far beyond Germany. Baumeister’s oeuvre and at the same time demonstrate his Baumeister – the inventory has grown to about 2,600 works international reputation. The works will be supplemented by today by some 700 German and international artists. The From early on, Baumeister was in close contact with French archival materials such as letters, newspaper articles, and collection represents an important range of predominantly artists and exhibited his works in Italy, Spain, France, and unpublished photographs that impressively illustrate the high abstract developments in art from the 20th century to the Switzerland. He could seamlessly resume these contacts degree to which he was recognized both in Germany and present day. Moreover, it includes some 30 large pieces of after the Second World War. The exhibition retraces his inter- abroad. Together they reveal the multifaceted image of an sculpture, automobile-related works done on commission as national relations to gallerists, collectors and art historians. artist who engaged in an intense exchange with the interna- well as photography, object- and media art that has been It will, for the first time, present parts of his private art col- tional art scene before and after the Second World War. built up systematically since 2001. lection, which he assembled through swapping his own works for paintings by his artist friends. The exhibition, conceived by the Kunstmuseum Stuttgart, has been adapted for Berlin and supplemented by works from the Daimler Art Collection. Willi Baumeister packing works for his exhibition at the Gallery Jeanne Bucher 2 Paris, 1949 3 f.l.: Willi Baumeister, Hans Arp, Friedrich Vordemberge-Gildewart f.l.: Adolf Fleischmann, Josef Albers Installation views, ‘Art from a hundred years 1909–2009’, Museum und Galerie im Prediger, 2009 Since the 1999 inauguration of the company’s own exhibition a dialogue with less recently acquired works. Since 2003 a space – Daimler Contemporary at Haus Huth on Potsdamer rotating selection of some 150 works at a time has gone Platz in Berlin – the systematic expansion of the collection on tour worldwide through major museums in Europe, the has been attentively followed by an international public. United States, South Africa, South America and Asia. New acquisitions for the Daimler Art Collection are presented there as well as internally, in Stuttgart, Berlin and Sindel- fingen, in themed rotating exhibitions, where they enter into Installation view, ‘Novecento mai visto’, Brescia, 2013 4 5 f.l.: Ben Willikens, Josef Albers, Hans Arp f.l.: Oskar Schlemmer, Josef Albers, Camille Graeser, Johannes Itten Installation views, ‘Classical : Modern I’, Daimler Contemporary, Berlin, 2006 Installation view, ‘Art & Stars & Cars’, Mercedes-Benz Museum, 6Stuttgart, 2011 7 In its early days the Daimler Art Collection focused mainly on pictures and particularly on artists from southern Germany, notably those connected with the Stuttgart Art Academy, including Adolf Hölzel and his pupils Oskar Schlemmer, Willi Baumeister, Johannes Itten, Ida Kerkovius, Camille Graeser and Max Ackermann, but also – extended to the European level – Hans Arp, Georges Vantongerloo, Otto Meyer-Amden and Max Bill. What they all had in common was an artistically motivated interest in establishing an interdisciplinary dia- logue between fine art, functional product design, architecture and aesthetic theory. Linking up with this founding principle, the Daimler Art Collection is, despite its broad scope, clearly f.l.: Adolf Hölzel, Oskar Schlemmer, Willi Baumeister anchored in the ‘Classical : Modern’ exhibition and publica- tion series, the first part of which, in 2006, introduced the concrete and constructivist tendencies of early modernist art up to the post-war era by drawing primarily on the collection itself. Installation views, ‘Classical : Modern I’, 8 f.l.: Willi Baumeister, Oskar Schlemmer, Ida Kerkovius Daimler Contemporary, Berlin, 2006 9 Renate Wiehager (Ed.): Kurt Leonhard, f.l.: Georg Meistermann, Fritz Winter, Willi Baumeister, Installation Cover ‘Avantgarden in Süddeutschland view, ‘Classical : Modern II’, Daimler Contemporary, Berlin, 2008 nach 1945’, Hatje Cantz 2012 The second part of the series, in 2008, focused on the avant- horizons that are intimately connected with south-west Ger- garde tendencies of post-war southern Germany. In 2012 this man art after 1945. In keeping with the focal point of our was followed by the third part of the series: a first compre- collection as it has evolved over the years, the exhibition hensive appreciation of Kurt Leonhard (‘Avantgarden in Süd- ‘Willi Baumeister International’ will go on to Berlin at Daimler deutschland nach 1945’; all related publications can be Contemporary in 2014/15 as the best possible sequel. obtained via www.art.daimler.com). Texts by Kurt Leonhard – art critic, lyric poet, philosopher, translator and curator who died in 2004 and was a close friend of Willi Baumeister’s – Installation views, ‘Willi Baumeister International’, and by Ottomar Domnick open up art-historical and historical Kunstmuseum Stuttgart, 2013/14 10 11 Installation views, ‘Willi Baumeister International’, 12Kunstmuseum Stuttgart, 2013/14 13 Willi Baumeister International Ilka Voermann and Hadwig Goez More than most artists, Willi Baumeister is perceived as a exhibited there and he participated in the international de- At the outset of Willi Baumeister’s career ‘international’ German painter. This is particularly true of his late work, bates on art. meant France in the first instance. Like so many other young which is inextricably linked with the art history of post-war artists of his generation, Willi Baumeister was enthusiastic Germany. This perception is not completely erroneous be- about Paul Cézanne and the French Impressionists. His early cause Willi Baumeister was indeed strongly rooted in Ger- work is clearly indebted to both. In 1910 works of his were many, especially in his native Stuttgart, which he had left shown at the Württemberg Art Association along with those only while he was a professor at the School of Decorative of both French and German artists and received critical ac- Arts in Frankfurt am Main (now the Städelschule) and for claim. He had his first international success two years later, brief periods during the Second World War. This impression is in Switzerland, when the Galerie Neupert in Zurich showed reinforced by the fact that he championed abstract art in his work alongside that of Hermann Huber and Reinhold Germany after 1945, which made him a guiding spirit in the Kündig.1 Still it would be ten years before notice was taken of debate about the future of German art after the Second his work in France as well. World War. For all that, classifying Willi Baumeister solely as a leading German painter falls far short of his significance. He was deeply rooted in the international art scene and bound by close ties to it both before and after the Second World War. He was in contact with artists, art critics and Junge am Landungssteg [Boy on a Landing Stage], 1909 Oil on cardboard, glued on the back with paper collectors in Europe and beyond Europe; his works were Wall Picture at the space of the architect Richard Döcker, 14 Werkbund exhibition in Stuttgart 1922 15 Installation views, ‘Willi Baumeister International’, 16Daimler Contemporary, 2014/15 17 Ohne Titel (Figurentreppe I) Apoll II, 1921/22 [Untitled (Staircase of Figures I)], 1920 Lithograph Lithograph During the early 1920s figuration continued to yield to simple within the international avant-garde. His work was also made geometric forms in Baumeister’s painting. Now Baumeister known in France through a positive article by Paul Ferdinand realigned himself with different role models, this time the Schmidt that was published in the ‘Kunstblatt’3 in 1921 and Russian Constructivists and the Dutch group of artists known a joint exhibition with Fernand Léger at the Der Sturm gallery as De Stijl.2 This was the context in which he developed his in Berlin in 1922. In addition an essay by Waldemar George own artistic stance, with the Wall Pictures featuring a unique on Baumeister’s painting was printed (also in 1922) in the blend of painting and architecture.
Recommended publications
  • The Stuttgart Region – Where Growth Meets Innovation Design: Atelier Brückner/Ph Oto: M
    The Stuttgart Region – Where Growth Meets Innovation oto: M. Jungblut Design: Atelier Brückner/Ph CERN, Universe of Particles/ Mercedes-Benz B-Class F-Cell, Daimler AG Mercedes-Benz The Stuttgart Region at a Glance Situated in the federal state of Baden- The Stuttgart Region is the birthplace and Württemberg in the southwest of Germa- home of Gottlieb Daimler and Robert ny, the Stuttgart Region comprises the Bosch, two important figures in the history City of Stuttgart (the state capital) and its of the motor car. Even today, vehicle five surrounding counties. With a popula- design and production as well as engineer- tion of 2.7 million, the area boasts a highly ing in general are a vital part of the region’s advanced industrial infrastructure and economy. Besides its traditional strengths, enjoys a well-earned reputation for its eco- the Stuttgart Region is also well known nomic strength, cutting-edge technology for its strong creative industries and its and exceptionally high quality of life. The enthusiasm for research and development. region has its own parliamentary assembly, ensuring fast and effective decision-mak- All these factors make the Stuttgart ing on regional issues such as local public Region one of the most dynamic and effi- transport, regional planning and business cient regions in the world – innovative in development. approach, international in outlook. Stuttgart Region Key Economic Data Population: 2.7 million from 170 countries Area: 3,654 km2 Population density: 724 per km2 People in employment: 1.5 million Stuttgart Region GDP: 109.8 billion e Corporate R&D expenditure as % of GDP: 7.5 Export rate of manufacturing industry: 63.4 % Productivity: 72,991 e/employee Per capita income: 37,936 e Data based on reports by Wirtschaftsförderung Region Stuttgart GmbH, Verband Region Stuttgart, IHK Region Stuttgart and Statistisches Landesamt Baden-Württemberg, 2014 Stuttgart-Marketing GmbH Oliver Schuster A Great Place to Live and Work Top Quality of Life Germany‘s Culture Capitals 1.
    [Show full text]
  • Futurism's Photography
    Futurism’s Photography: From fotodinamismo to fotomontaggio Sarah Carey University of California, Los Angeles The critical discourse on photography and Italian Futurism has proven to be very limited in its scope. Giovanni Lista, one of the few critics to adequately analyze the topic, has produced several works of note: Futurismo e fotografia (1979), I futuristi e la fotografia (1985), Cinema e foto- grafia futurista (2001), Futurism & Photography (2001), and most recently Il futurismo nella fotografia (2009).1 What is striking about these titles, however, is that only one actually refers to “Futurist photography” — or “fotografia futurista.” In fact, given the other (though few) scholarly studies of Futurism and photography, there seems to have been some hesitancy to qualify it as such (with some exceptions).2 So, why has there been this sense of distacco? And why only now might we only really be able to conceive of it as its own genre? This unusual trend in scholarly discourse, it seems, mimics closely Futurism’s own rocky relationship with photography, which ranged from an initial outright distrust to a later, rather cautious acceptance that only came about on account of one critical stipulation: that Futurist photography was neither an art nor a formal and autonomous aesthetic category — it was, instead, an ideological weapon. The Futurists were only able to utilize photography towards this end, and only with the further qualification that only certain photographic forms would be acceptable for this purpose: the portrait and photo-montage. It is, in fact, the very legacy of Futurism’s appropriation of these sub-genres that allows us to begin to think critically about Futurist photography per se.
    [Show full text]
  • Caffeina E Vodka Italia E Russia: Futurismi a Confronto Claudia Salaris
    Caffeina e vodka Italia e Russia: futurismi a confronto Claudia Salaris Il viaggio di Marinetti in Russia Negli anni eroici del futurismo il fondatore Filippo Tommaso Marinetti era noto con il soprannome di “Caffeina d’Europa” per l’energia con cui diffondeva la religione del futuro da un paese all’altro. Uno dei suoi viaggi memorabili è quello in Russia all’inizio del 1914 1. Invitato a tenere un ciclo di conferenze a Mosca e a Pietroburgo, Il poeta ha accettato con entusiasmo, pensando a un patto d’unità d’azione con i fratelli orientali. Infatti nella terra degli zar il futurismo è nato con caratteristiche proprie,ma è sempre un parente stretto del movimento marinettiano. Nelle realizzazioni dell’avanguardia russa non sono pochi gli echi delle teorie e invenzioni del futurismo marinettiano. Ma, al contrario degli italiani che formano una specie di partito d’artisti omogeneo, i russi sono sparsi in diversi gruppi. Nel 1910 è uscita a Pietroburgo l’antologia Il vivaio dei giudici , a cui hanno collaborato, tra gli altri, i fratelli David e Nikolaj Burljuk, Elena Guro, Vasilij Kamenskij, Viktor Chlebnikov. A costoro presto si sono uniti Vladimir Majakovskij, Benedikt Livshich, Alexandr Kruchënych e alla fine del 1912 il gruppo, che intanto ha assunto il nome di Gileja, pubblica il volume Schiaffo al gusto corrente , che nel titolo rivela la matrice marinettiana, ricalcando il “disprezzo del pubblico” promulgato dal poeta italiano. Il libro collettivo contiene un editoriale-manifesto in cui i gilejani, rifiutando il passato e le accademie, esortano i giovani a “gettare Pushkin, Dostoevskij, Tolstoj, ecc.
    [Show full text]
  • Frankfurt Und Der Aufbruch in Die Ungegenständlichkeit
    Originalveröffentlichung in: Freigang, Christian (Hrsg.): Das "neue" Frankfurt : Innovationen in der Frankfurter Kunst vom Mittelalter bis heute ; Vorträge der 1. Frankfurter Bürger-Universität, Wiesbaden 2010, S. 74-86 Frankfurt und der Aufbruch in die Ungegenständlichkeit Thomas Kirchner auf sich, da es ihr nicht oder nicht ausreichend gelungen war, sich einem breiten Publikum Frankfurt und die Malerei der Moderne: Da­ verständlich zu machen, dabei aber - und dies bei denkt man vielleicht zunächst an die späten unterschied die Situation in Deutschland von 20er Jahre, in denen die Stadt durch kommuna­ den übrigen westlichen Ländern - eine große le Kulturpolitik und privates Mäzenatentum zu Sichtbarkeit besaß, hatten sich doch hier die einem Ort künstlerischer Innovation avancierte Museen und die privaten Sammlungen in einem und u.a. so bedeutenden Vertreter der Moderne hohen Maße der Moderne geöffnet. Dabei hatte wie Max Beckmann oder Willi Baumeister für zumindest ein Teil der Moderne anfangs durch­ die Kunstschule des Städel gewonnen werden aus mit den Ideen der Nationalsozialisten ge­ konnten. Weniger bekannt ist die zentrale Rolle liebäugelt. Emil Noldes Parteimitgliedschaft in der Mainmetropole für die Kunst nach dem 2. der NSDAP ist bekannt, auch Ernst Ludwig Weltkrieg. Um sie besser einschätzen zu können, Kirchners tiefe Enttäuschung, von den neu­ scheint es indes hilfreich, ein wenig auszuho­ en Machthabern nicht als Repräsentant einer len. Die Ausführungen nehmen ihren Ausgang neuen, dezidiert .deutschen' Kunst anerkannt von dem Versuch einer Neuorientierung der zu werden. Und ein Teil der Nationalsozialis­ Kunst nach dem Niedergang des Dritten Rei­ ten - unter ihnen der Propagandaminister Jo­ ches, wie man ihn mit besonderem Nachdruck seph Goebbels - war eine Zeitlang durchaus in Berlin und im Osten Deutschlands beobach­ gewillt, das Angebot anzunehmen und den ten kann, um sich schrittweise dem Südwesten deutschen Expressionismus als die Kunst der des Landes und Frankfurt zu nähern.
    [Show full text]
  • Futurism-Anthology.Pdf
    FUTURISM FUTURISM AN ANTHOLOGY Edited by Lawrence Rainey Christine Poggi Laura Wittman Yale University Press New Haven & London Disclaimer: Some images in the printed version of this book are not available for inclusion in the eBook. Published with assistance from the Kingsley Trust Association Publication Fund established by the Scroll and Key Society of Yale College. Frontispiece on page ii is a detail of fig. 35. Copyright © 2009 by Yale University. All rights reserved. This book may not be reproduced, in whole or in part, including illustrations, in any form (beyond that copying permitted by Sections 107 and 108 of the U.S. Copyright Law and except by reviewers for the public press), without written permission from the publishers. Designed by Nancy Ovedovitz and set in Scala type by Tseng Information Systems, Inc. Printed in the United States of America by Sheridan Books. Library of Congress Cataloging-in-Publication Data Futurism : an anthology / edited by Lawrence Rainey, Christine Poggi, and Laura Wittman. p. cm. Includes bibliographical references and index. ISBN 978-0-300-08875-5 (cloth : alk. paper) 1. Futurism (Art) 2. Futurism (Literary movement) 3. Arts, Modern—20th century. I. Rainey, Lawrence S. II. Poggi, Christine, 1953– III. Wittman, Laura. NX456.5.F8F87 2009 700'.4114—dc22 2009007811 A catalogue record for this book is available from the British Library. This paper meets the requirements of ANSI/NISO Z39.48–1992 (Permanence of Paper). 10 9 8 7 6 5 4 3 2 1 CONTENTS Acknowledgments xiii Introduction: F. T. Marinetti and the Development of Futurism Lawrence Rainey 1 Part One Manifestos and Theoretical Writings Introduction to Part One Lawrence Rainey 43 The Founding and Manifesto of Futurism (1909) F.
    [Show full text]
  • Carlo Carrà Metaphysical Spaces Curated by Ester Coen
    Carlo Carrà Metaphysical Spaces Curated by Ester Coen Blain|Southern 4 Hanover Square London W1S 1BP 8 July – 20 August 2016 Private View: 7 July, 6 – 8pm Carlo Carrà, Il Pino sul Mare, 1921 Private Collection ’Simplicity in tonal and linear relations - that is all that really concerns me now.’ Carlo Carrà in a letter to Ardengo Soffici, 1916 Blain|Southern presents an exhibition of paintings and drawings by Carlo Carrà, curated by Ester Coen. The Italian avant-garde artist is renowned for his integral role in both Futurist and Metaphysical painting. At the centre of the exhibition are Carrà’s paintings, many from public and private collections and rarely shown publicly. Shown in the UK for the first time Il Pino Sul Mare (1921) is a work that was considered so important by influential German art historian Wilhelm Worringer that he wrote to Carrà and described it as ‘my spiritual property’. A dozen other works, including Mio Figlio (1916) and Penelope (1917), comprise a group of Carrà’s key paintings that have not been presented together in over fifty years. Each is a significant work in its own right, and together they illuminate Carrà’s intellectual journey and artistic achievements. Typified by dream-like views and unexpected juxtapositions of elements, such as mannequins in eerie arcaded piazzas, the Metaphysical style of painting was led by Carrà and Giorgio de Chirico. Although their investigations initially developed independently from one another, their discourse began in 1917 when together they formally established the principles of Pittura Metafisica. The artists strived to connect with the soul by focussing on quotidian objects and the built environment.
    [Show full text]
  • THE PRESENCE of SAND in WASSILY KANDINSKY's PARISIAN PAINTINGS by ASHLEY DENISE MILLWOOD DR. LUCY CURZON, COMMITTEE CHAIR
    THE PRESENCE OF SAND IN WASSILY KANDINSKY’S PARISIAN PAINTINGS by ASHLEY DENISE MILLWOOD DR. LUCY CURZON, COMMITTEE CHAIR DR. MINDY NANCARROW DR. JESSICA DALLOW A THESIS Submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Master of Arts in the Joint Program in Art History in the Graduate Schools of The University of Alabama at Birmingham and The University of Alabama TUSCALOOSA, ALABAMA 2013 Copyright Ashley Denise Millwood 2013 ALL RIGHTS RESERVED ABSTRACT Despite the extensive research that has been done on Wassily Kandinsky, little has been said about his use of sand during the decade that he spent in Paris. During this time, Kandinsky’s work shows a significant shift in both style and technique. One particular innovation was the addition of sand, and I find it interesting that this aspect of Kandinsky’s career has not been fully explored. I saw Kandinsky’s use of sand as an interesting addition to his work, and I questioned his use of this material. The lack of research in this area gave me the opportunity to formulate a theory as to why Kandinsky used sand and no other extraneous material. This examination of Kandinsky’s use of sand will contribute to the overall understanding that we have of his work by providing us with a theory and a purpose behind his use of sand. The purpose was to underscore the spirituality that can be found in his artworks. ii DEDICATION I would like to dedicate this thesis to everyone who helped me in both my research and my writing.
    [Show full text]
  • Federico Luisetti, “A Futurist Art of the Past”, Ameriquests 12.1 (2015)
    Federico Luisetti, “A Futurist Art of the Past”, AmeriQuests 12.1 (2015) A Futurist Art of the Past: Anton Giulio Bragaglia’s Photodynamism Anton Giulio Bragaglia, Un gesto del capo1 Un gesto del capo (A gesture of the head) is a rare 1911 “Photodynamic” picture by Anton Giulio Bragaglia (1890-1960), the Rome-based photographer, director of experimental films, gallerist, theater director, and essayist who played a key role in the development of the Italian Avant- gardes. Initially postcard photographs mailed out to friends, Futurist Photodynamics consist of twenty or so medium size pictures of small gestures (greeting, nodding, bowing), acts of leisure, work, or movements (typing, smoking, a slap in the face), a small corpus that preceded and influenced the experimentations of European Avant-garde photography, such as Christian Schad’s Schadographs, Man Ray’s Rayographs, and Lazlo Moholy-Nagy’s Photograms. Thanks to historians of photography, in particular Giovanni Lista and Marta Braun, we are familiar with the circumstances that led to the birth of Photodynamism, which took on and transformed the principles proclaimed in the April 11, 1910 Manifesto tecnico della pittura futurista (Technical Manifesto of Futurist Painting) by Umberto Boccioni, Carlo Carrà, Luigi Russolo, Giacomo Balla, and Gino Severini, where the primacy of movement and the nature of “dynamic sensation” challenge the conventions of traditional visual arts: “The gesture which we would reproduce on canvas shall no longer be a fixed moment in universal dynamism. It shall simply be 1 (A Gesture of the Head), 1911. Gelatin silver print, 17.8 x 12.7 cm, Gilman Collection, The Metropolitan Museum of Art, New York].
    [Show full text]
  • Isa Genzken Born 1948 in Bad Oldesloe, Germany
    This document was updated April 15, 2021. For reference only and not for purposes of publication. For more information, please contact the gallery. Isa Genzken Born 1948 in Bad Oldesloe, Germany. Lives and works in Berlin. EDUCATION 1973-1977 Kunstakademie Düsseldorf 1973-1975 Art History and Philosophy Studies, Universität Köln, Cologne 1971-1973 Hochschule der Künste, Berlin 1969-1971 Hochschule für Bildende Künste, Hamburg SOLO EXHIBITIONS 2021 Isa Genzken: Here and Now, Kunstsammlung Nordrhein-Westfalen, Düsseldorf 2020 Isa Genzken: Nüsschen, Galerie Buchholz, New York Isa Genzken and Wolfgang Tillmans, KAT_A, Bad Honnef-Rhöndorf, Germany [two-person exhibition] Isa Genzken, David Zwirner, Paris Isa Genzken: Window, Hauser & Wirth, London Isa Genzken: Works 1973 – 1983, Kunstmuseum Basel | Gegenwart, Basel [itinerary: K21 Kunstsammlung Nordrhein-Westfalen, Düsseldorf, Düsseldorf] [catalogue] 2019 Isa Genzken, Charles Asprey, London Isa Genzken, Kunsthalle Bern, Switzerland Isa Genzken. Collagen, Galerie Jahn und Jahn, Munich 2018 Isa Genzken: Außenprojekte, Galerie Buchholz, Berlin Isa Genzken: Sky Energy, David Zwirner, New York 2017 Isa Genzken: Issie Energie, König Galerie, Berlin [organized in collabortion with Galerie Buchholz, Berlin] Isa Genzken: Kaiserringträgerin der Stadt Goslar 2017, Mönchehaus Museum Goslar, Germany 2016 Isa Genzken: I Love Michael Asher, Hauser Wirth & Schimmel, Los Angeles Isa Genzken: Portraits, Galerie Buchholz, New York Isa Genzken: Two Orchids, Doris C. Freedman Plaza, Central Park, New York [organized
    [Show full text]
  • Dossiê Kandinsky Kandinsky Beyond Painting: New Perspectives
    dossiê kandinsky kandinsky beyond painting: new perspectives Lissa Tyler Renaud Guest Editor DOI: https://doi.org/10.26512/dramaturgias.v0i9.24910 issn: 2525-9105 introduction This Special Issue on Kandinsky is dedicated to exchanges between Theatre and Music, artists and researchers, practitioners and close observers. The Contents were also selected to interest and surprise the general public’s multitudes of Kandinsky aficionados. Since Dr. Marcus Mota’s invitation in 2017, I have been gathering scholarly, professional, and other thoughtful writings, to make of the issue a lively, expansive, and challenging inquiry into Kandinsky’s works, activities, and thinking — especially those beyond painting. “Especially those beyond painting.” Indeed, the conceit of this issue, Kandinsky Beyond Painting, is that there is more than enough of Kandinsky’s life in art for discussion in the fields of Theatre, Poetry, Music, Dance and Architecture, without even broaching the field he is best known for working in. You will find a wide-ranging collection of essays and articles organized under these headings. Over the years, Kandinsky studies have thrived under the care of a tight- knit group of intrepid scholars who publish and confer. But Kandinsky seems to me to be everywhere. In my reading, for example, his name appears unexpectedly in books on a wide range of topics: philosophy, popular science, physics, neuroscience, history, Asian studies, in personal memoirs of people in far-flung places, and more. Then, too, I know more than a few people who are not currently scholars or publishing authors evoking Kandinsky’s name, but who nevertheless have important Further Perspectives, being among the most interesting thinkers on Kandinsky, having dedicated much rumination to the deeper meanings of his life and work.
    [Show full text]
  • UNIVERSITY of CALIFORNIA Los Angeles Fillia's Futurism Writing
    UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA Los Angeles Fillia’s Futurism Writing, Politics, Gender and Art after the First World War A dissertation submitted in partial satisfaction of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy in Italian By Adriana Marie Baranello 2014 © Copyright by Adriana Marie Baranello 2014 ABSTRACT OF THE DISSERTATION Fillia’s Futurism Writing, Politics, Gender and Art after the First World War By Adriana Marie Baranello Doctor of Philosophy in Italian University of California, Los Angeles, 2014 Professor Lucia Re, Co-Chair Professor Claudio Fogu, Co-Chair Fillia (Luigi Colombo, 1904-1936) is one of the most significant and intriguing protagonists of the Italian futurist avant-garde in the period between the two World Wars, though his body of work has yet to be considered in any depth. My dissertation uses a variety of critical methods (socio-political, historical, philological, narratological and feminist), along with the stylistic analysis and close reading of individual works, to study and assess the importance of Fillia’s literature, theater, art, political activism, and beyond. Far from being derivative and reactionary in form and content, as interwar futurism has often been characterized, Fillia’s works deploy subtler, but no less innovative forms of experimentation. For most of his brief but highly productive life, Fillia lived and worked in Turin, where in the early 1920s he came into contact with Antonio Gramsci and his factory councils. This led to a period of extreme left-wing communist-futurism. In the mid-1920s, following Marinetti’s lead, Fillia moved toward accommodation with the fascist regime. This shift to the right eventually even led to a phase ii dominated by Catholic mysticism, from which emerged his idiosyncratic and highly original futurist sacred art.
    [Show full text]
  • Ernst Kirchner's Streetwalkers: Art, Luxury, and Immorality in Berlin, 1913-16 Author(S): Sherwin Simmons Reviewed Work(S): Source: the Art Bulletin, Vol
    Ernst Kirchner's Streetwalkers: Art, Luxury, and Immorality in Berlin, 1913-16 Author(s): Sherwin Simmons Reviewed work(s): Source: The Art Bulletin, Vol. 82, No. 1 (Mar., 2000), pp. 117-148 Published by: College Art Association Stable URL: http://www.jstor.org/stable/3051367 . Accessed: 01/10/2012 16:52 Your use of the JSTOR archive indicates your acceptance of the Terms & Conditions of Use, available at . http://www.jstor.org/page/info/about/policies/terms.jsp . JSTOR is a not-for-profit service that helps scholars, researchers, and students discover, use, and build upon a wide range of content in a trusted digital archive. We use information technology and tools to increase productivity and facilitate new forms of scholarship. For more information about JSTOR, please contact [email protected]. College Art Association is collaborating with JSTOR to digitize, preserve and extend access to The Art Bulletin. http://www.jstor.org Ernst Kirchner's Streetwalkers: Art, Luxury, and Immorality in Berlin, 1913-16 SherwinSimmons An article entitled "Culture in the Display Window," which formulation of Berlin as a whore and representations of surveyed the elegant artistry of Berlin's display windows, fashion contributed to Kirchner's interpretation of the street- appeared in Der Kritiker,a Berlin cultural journal, during the walkers.8 My study extends such claims by examining the summer of 1913. Its author stated that these windows were an impact of specific elements within the discourse about luxury important factor in Germany's recent economic boom and and immorality on Kirchner's work and considering why such the concomitant rise of its culture on the world stage, serving issues would have concerned an avant-garde artist.
    [Show full text]