DOCSLIB.ORG

Unanimous-Consent Agreement

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Unanimous-Consent Agreement October 14, 1988 CONGRESSIONAL RECORD — SENATE S 16269 I am proud to be a cosponsor of S. Mr. BYRD. It will be fine with me. 1851 and to have voted for it in the I ask unanimous consent that the ments be in order, with the exception of the Committee on the Judiciary. S. 1851 is committee-reported substitute amendment. motion to reconsider be vitiated. Ordered further. That time for debate on supported by the Department of Jus­ The PRESIDING OFFICER. With- any debatable motion, appeal, or point of tice, American Bar Association, Ameri­ out objection, it is so ordered. order, if submitted by the Chair, be limited can Jewish Committee, National Spir­ Mr. THURMOND. Mr. President, I to 10 minutes each. itual Assembly of the Baha'is of the did not understand. Ordered further, That no motion to recom­ United States, Armenian Assembly of mit, with or without instructions, be in Mr. BYRD. I vitiated the motion to order. America, Amnesty International reconsider. Ordered further, That time for debate on U.S.A., and other organizations. Mr. THURMOND. I thank the Sena­ the bill be limited to11/2hours, to be equally Perhaps the most compelling words tor very much. divided and controlled between the Majority to demonstrate the importance of and Minority Leaders, or their designees. passing S. 1851 in this Congress were Ordered further,That the agreement be in those of Elie Weisel before the Judici­ UNANIMOUS-CONSENT AGREE- the usual form. (Oct. 14, 1988) ary Committee. He said, "What is at MENT—H.R. 3911, DEFENSE stake is the future of many nations. PROCUREMENT FRAUD BILL What is at stake is our honor as a APPOINTMENT OF ADDITIONAL nation governed by an ancient ethical Mr. BYRD. Mr. President, I ask BANKRUPTCY JUDGES tradition that proclaims its belief that unanimous consent that the majority Mr. BYRD. Mr. President, I ask life is to be celebrated and sanctified— leader, after consultation with the mi­ unanimous consent that the Senate that applies to the life of the individ­ nority leader, any move to proceed to proceed to the immediate consider­ ual and of human communities alike." the consderation of Calendar No. 924, ation of Calendar Order No. 948, H.R. I urge adoption of S. 1851. H.R. 3911, the defense procurement 4064. Mr. HELMS. Mr. President, when fraud bill, and that it be considered The PRESIDING OFFICER. The the Genocide Convention was ap­ under the following time limitation: bill will be stated by title. proved by the Senate on February 18, One and a half hours on the bill, The assistant legislative clerk read 1986, I was pleased that two reserva­ equally divided and controlled between as follows: tions, five understandings, and one the two leaders or their designees. A bill (H.R. 4064) to amend title XXVIII mandatory declaration were attached Five minutes on a managers' techni­ of the United States Code to authorize the thereto. cal amendment to be offered to the appointment of additional bankruptcy The understandings and reservations committee substitute amendment. judges. which were made a part of the Geno­ Five minutes on a Grassley amend­ The PRESIDING OFFICER. Is cide Convention were a response to ment dealing with technical changes to there objection to the present consid­ the criticism raised by the late, great the False Claims Act. eration of the bill? Senator from North Carolina, my Ten minutes on a Grassley-Levin There being no objection, the Senate friend and colleague Senator Sam amendment dealing with allowable proceeded to consider the bill. Ervin. These reservations and under- costs for Government contractors. AMENDMENT NO. 3700 standings constitute a memorial to Thirty minutes on an amendment to (Purpose: To authorize the appointment of Senator Ervin and his lifelong commit­ be offered on behalf of Senator CRAN­ additional bankruptcy judges) ment to the U.S. Constitution. They STON adding the text of S. 1456. represent the very minimum of consti­ Mr. BYRD. Mr. President, I call up tutional protections for this great Five minutes on an amendment to be an amendment on behalf of Senators Nation. offered on behalf of Mr. LEAHY to in- BENTSEN, DECONCINI, and MCCAIN. corporate the text of S. 438 as passed The PRESIDING OFFICER. The Mr. President, I voted against the by the Senate. amendment will be stated. ratification of the Genocide Conven­ Ten minutes on any debatable The assistant legislative clerk read tion in memory of Senator Ervin. motion, appeal, or point of order, if Thanks to the provisos approved by as follows: submitted by the Chair. The Senator from West Virginia [Mr. the Foreign Relations Committee and Provided, further, that no other BYRD], for Mr. BENTSEN, (for himself, Mr. attached by the Senate to the Conven­ amendments be in order, with the ex­ DECONCINI, and Mr. MCCAIN), proposes an tion, the Genocide Convention is more amendment numbered 3700. a symbol than a legal reality. Never­ ception of the committee-reported theless, I still have concerns about substitute amendment. Mr. BYRD. Mr. President. I ask how it might be implemented. That the agreement be in the usual unanimous consent that reading of the form and that no motion to recommit, amendment be dispensed with. The legislation on which we are with or without instructions, be in The PRESIDING OFFICER. With- about to vote meets some of those con­ out objection, it is so ordered. cerns. I preferred a simple resolution order. condemning genocide in 1986. I prefer The PRESIDING OFFICER. With- The amendment is as follows: a simple resolution condemning geno­ out objection, it is so ordered. Strike out "and" at the end of paragraph cide now. I condemn genocide, which The text of the agreement is as fol­ (4) in the first section. is mass murder, in any form. However, lows: Strike out the period at the end of para- I will still vote against this legislation Ordered, That the Majority Leader, after graph (5) in the first section and insert in consultation with the Minority Leader, may lieu thereof a comma. because of Senator Ervin's objections move to proceed to the consideration of After paragraph (5), add the following: and because I believe that the Conven­ H.R. 3811, the Defense procurement fraud (6) in the item relating to the western dis­ tion is at best an uncertain symbol. bill, and that it be considered under the fol­ trict of Texas, by striking "3"and inserting Criminal laws are the best way of deal­ lowing time limitation: "4", and ing with criminals, domestic or inter- Managers' technical amendment, to be of­ (7) in the item relating to the district of national. fered to the committee substitute amend­ Arizona, by striking "4"and inserting "5". The bill was ordered to be engrossed ment, 5 minutes The PRESIDING OFFICER. The Grassley amendment, dealing with techni­ question is on agreeing to the amend­ for a third reading, read the third cal changes to the False Claims Act, 5 min­ ment. time, and passed. utes The amendment (No. 3700) was Mr. BYRD. Mr. President, I ask Grassley-Levin amendment, dealing with agreed to. unanimous consent that the motion to allowable costs for government contractors, Mr. STEVENS. Mr. President, I am reconsider be laid on the table. 10 minutes delighted today to rise in support of The PRESIDING OFFICER. With- Amendment to be offered on behalf of H.R. 4064, a bill which authorizes five out objection, it is so ordered. Senator CRANSTON, adding text of S. 1456, 30 minutes new bankruptcy judges including one Mr. THURMOND. Mr. President, an Amendment to be offered on behalf of for the Judicial District of Alaska. inquiry: Are we going to reconsider Senator LEAHY, to incorporate the text of S. I am indebted to my good friend and each of these bills without reconsider­ 438, as passed the Senate, 5 minutes colleague, Congressman DON YOUNG, ing the nominations of judges? Ordered further, That no other amend­.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Zoning Priorities: Amended Substitute Motion to CRC Motion 1.4.2021 CLEAN MOTION
    Zoning Priorities: Amended Substitute Motion to CRC Motion 1.4.2021 CLEAN MOTION: I move to amend the CRC motion on the table with a substitute motion that would change the wording in multiple paragraphs. Motions that would significantly amend the original motion are known as “substitute” amendments in Roberts Rules or Order (2nd edition, Chapter 5 C3: Substitute page 47). 3. Substitute Amendment: "The form for amending paragraphs that parallels striking out and inserting words has its own name: to substitute. A substitute replaces a paragraph or paragraphs in the immediately pending motion with one or more paragraphs given the amendment. A substitute may be offered for a paragraph or paragraphs, or any larger units: sections, articles .or even the entire main motion." P. 47 of the handbook The proposed Substitute amended motion would read as follows: The Substitute Motion as presented is as follows Motion: To direct the Town Manager to present zoning amendment- options to the Planning Board and Town Council Community Resources Committee, and ultimately the Town Council that promote diverse neighborhoods, affordable housing, and new growth in downtown and village centers, in accordance with Town Council Economic Vitality Performance Goal for the Town Manager (July 1,2020 to June 30, 2020), and where possible consider Climate Action, Housing Affordability, and Social Justice Goals. in the following time periods: Design guidelines: Throughout the coming year begin discussions and development of design guidelines that could be added to current
    [Show full text]
  • The Amending Process in the House of Representatives
    The Amending Process in the House of Representatives Christopher M. Davis Analyst on Congress and the Legislative Process Updated September 16, 2015 Congressional Research Service 7-5700 www.crs.gov 98-995 The Amending Process in the House of Representatives Summary Most amendments that Representatives propose to legislation on the House floor are offered in the Committee of the Whole. Measures considered under suspension of the rules are not subject to floor amendments, and few amendments are proposed to bills and resolutions considered in the House or in the House as in Committee of the Whole. The House’s procedures recognize distinctions between first- and second-degree amendments, between perfecting and substitute amendments, and among amendments in the forms of motions to strike, to insert, and to strike out and insert. An amendment in the nature of a substitute proposes to replace the entire text of a bill or resolution. All amendments must be germane to the text they would amend, and they are subject to other general prohibitions such as that against proposing only to re-amend language that has already been fully amended. Additional restrictions apply to appropriations and tax amendments, and the budget process creates various other points of order that Members may make against certain amendments. In general, a Member must make a point of order against an amendment before debate on it begins unless that point of order is waived by a special rule. Under an open amendment process in the Committee of the Whole, measures are usually considered for amendment one section or paragraph at a time.
    [Show full text]
  • How a Bill Becomes 4
    WELCOME TO THE WISCONSIN STATE ASSEMBLY ince becoming a state in 1848, Wisconsin has continued to demonstrate strong leadership and democracy. Because TABLE OF CONTENTS S 2 ...... Introduction of this proud history, our state has been looked to repeatedly as a national leader in government 4 ...... “The Law Needs to Change” innovation and reform. “How A Bill Becomes 4 ...... WisconsinEye Provides View of the Legislature Law” was created to help visitors understand 5 ...... Deliberation and Examination Wisconsin’s legislative process and provide 5 ...... Making a Good Idea Better suggestions on how citizens can participate in 6 ...... The Importance of Caucuses that process. This booklet explains how one idea 7 ...... First & Second Reading or inspiration becomes a bill and moves through 7 ...... Third Reading and Passage the legislative process and into the law books. 7 ...... On to the Senate It is a long road from initial development of an 8 ...... Assembly Bill 27 idea to the emergence of a new law. During 9 ...... Approval of the Governor and Into the Law Books consideration, the bill will be scrutinized and 9 ...... Conclusion examined, criticized and praised. It will be 10 .... Staying in Touch–How to Contact changed, improved, strengthened, and even Your State Representative weakened. If passed, it will undergo the ultimate 11 .... Find Information Online test of merit—time. 12 .... “How a Bill Becomes Law” Cartoon 13 .... “How a Bill Becomes Law” Flow Chart *Words in bold print are defined in the Glossary at the back of the booklet. 14 .... Glossary In this booklet, the bill used as an example of “How a Bill Becomes Law” is 2015 Assembly Bill 27.
    [Show full text]
  • The Amending Process in the House of Representatives
    The Amending Process in the House of Representatives Christopher M. Davis Analyst on Congress and the Legislative Process September 16, 2015 Congressional Research Service 7-5700 www.crs.gov 98-995 The Amending Process in the House of Representatives Summary Most amendments that Representatives propose to legislation on the House floor are offered in the Committee of the Whole. Measures considered under suspension of the rules are not subject to floor amendments, and few amendments are proposed to bills and resolutions considered in the House or in the House as in Committee of the Whole. The House’s procedures recognize distinctions between first- and second-degree amendments, between perfecting and substitute amendments, and among amendments in the forms of motions to strike, to insert, and to strike out and insert. An amendment in the nature of a substitute proposes to replace the entire text of a bill or resolution. All amendments must be germane to the text they would amend, and they are subject to other general prohibitions such as that against proposing only to re-amend language that has already been fully amended. Additional restrictions apply to appropriations and tax amendments, and the budget process creates various other points of order that Members may make against certain amendments. In general, a Member must make a point of order against an amendment before debate on it begins unless that point of order is waived by a special rule. Under an open amendment process in the Committee of the Whole, measures are usually considered for amendment one section or paragraph at a time.
    [Show full text]
  • The Amending Process in the Senate
    The Amending Process in the Senate Christopher M. Davis Analyst on Congress and the Legislative Process Updated September 16, 2015 Congressional Research Service 7-5700 www.crs.gov 98-853 The Amending Process in the Senate Summary A bill is subject to amendment as soon as the Senate begins to consider it. Committee amendments are considered first; then Senators can offer amendments to any part of the bill, generally, in any order. Senators may debate each amendment without limit unless the Senate (1) agrees to a motion to table (kill) the amendment, (2) agrees to a unanimous consent request to limit debate on the amendment, or (3) invokes cloture, limiting debate on the amendment or on the bill and all amendments to it. There are several different types of amendments. A first-degree amendment proposes to change the text of the bill; a second-degree amendment proposes to change the text of a first-degree amendment that the Senate is considering. Third-degree amendments are not allowed. An amendment may propose to strike out language from a bill (or a first-degree amendment), insert new language, or replace language by striking out and inserting. In general, an amendment that proposes to replace the entire text of a bill is known as an amendment in the nature of a substitute; an amendment to replace the entire text of a first-degree amendment is known as a substitute amendment. An amendment, especially in the second degree, that makes some lesser change is known as a perfecting amendment. Depending on the kinds of amendments that Senators offer and the order in which they are recognized to offer their amendments, Senators can offer anywhere from three to 11 amendments before the Senate has to vote on any of them.
    [Show full text]
  • Amendments to the FY 2021 Budget Resolution Last Updated: February 5, 2021
    Amendments to the FY 2021 Budget Resolution Last Updated: February 5, 2021 At 5:23 am on February 5, the Senate passed an amended budget resolution for FY 2021 on a 51-50 vote (Vice President Harris broke the tie). This sets the parameters for a COVID-19 relief package to pass through budget reconciliation. Dozens of amendments were voted on, but the important part of the budget resolution - the reconciliation instructions - did not change. The text of the Senate-passed resolution is available at https://rules.house.gov/sites/democrats.rules.house.gov/files/BILLS-117sconres5eas.pd f An explainer on the reconciliation instructions is available at https://www.progressivecaucuscenter.org/s/Reconciliation-Instructions.pdf An explainer on the broader reconciliation process is available at https://www.progressivecaucuscenter.org/s/Overcoming-the-Filibuster-Through-Bu dget-Reconciliation.pdf Deficit-Neutral Reserve Funds All adopted amendments took the form of (or adjusted) deficit-neutral reserve funds (DNRFs). Deficit-neutral reserve funds have little practical policy impact and are in no way binding. Creation of a reserve fund simply means the Budget Committee can shift the budget levels for program areas to accommodate relevant legislation as long as the legislation does not add to the deficit. (This prevents a possible budget point of order down the road.) In practice, this is almost never applicable. Moreover, any legislation is generally still subject to potential filibuster (and 60-vote threshold) in the Senate unless it is passing under budget reconciliation. DNRFs should be treated as the equivalent of the Sense of the Senate.
    [Show full text]
  • Conference Committees and Amendments Between the Houses
    Resolving Legislative Differences in Congress: Conference Committees and Amendments Between the Houses Updated May 22, 2019 Congressional Research Service https://crsreports.congress.gov 98-696 Resolving Legislative Differences in Congress: Conference Committees and Amendments Summary The Constitution requires that the House and Senate approve the same bill or joint resolution in precisely the same form before it is presented to the President for his signature or veto. To this end, both houses must pass the same measure and then attempt to reach agreement about its provisions. The House and Senate may be able to reach agreement by an exchange of amendments between the houses. Each house has one opportunity to amend the amendments from the other house, so there can be Senate amendments to House amendments to Senate amendments to a House bill. House amendments to Senate bills or amendments are privileged for consideration on the Senate floor; Senate amendments to House bills or amendments generally are not privileged for consideration on the House floor. In practice, the House often disposes of amendments between the houses under the terms of a special rule reported by the Rules Committee. The Senate sometimes disposes of House amendments by unanimous consent, but the procedures associated with the exchange of amendments can become complicated. Alternatively, the House and Senate can each disagree to the position of the other on a bill and then agree to create a conference committee to propose a package settlement of all their disagreements. Most conferees are drawn from the standing committees that had considered the bill initially. The House or Senate may vote to instruct its conferees before they are appointed, but such instructions are not binding.
    [Show full text]
  • Table of Contents
    HOUSE RULES 1 RULES OF THE ARIZONA HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 53rd LEGISLATURE 2017-2018 RULE 1 MEMBERS A. The House may punish its members for disorderly behavior and may, with the concurrence of two-thirds of the members elected to the House, expel any member (Arizona Constitution, Article IV, Part 2, Section 11). A violation of any of the House Rules shall be deemed disorderly behavior. When a roll call vote is ordered on the floor of the House and subject to the provisions of Rules 6 and 14, members are required to vote after a reasonable time, as determined by the Chair, and may be punished for disorderly conduct if the member fails to vote after a reasonable time. B. When any member shall be guilty of a breach of any of the Rules and Orders of the House, and the House has determined that he has so transgressed; he shall not be permitted to vote or speak, except by way of excuse for the same, until he has made satisfaction. C. Any member having obtained leave of absence and having in his possession papers relative to business before the House shall leave same with the Chief Clerk. ________ RULE 2 ANNUAL SESSIONS A. Except as provided herein, regular sessions shall be adjourned sine die no later than Saturday of the week in which the one hundredth day from the beginning of each regular session falls. The Speaker may by declaration authorize the extension of the session for a period not to exceed seven additional days. Thereafter the session can be extended only by a majority vote of the House.
    [Show full text]
  • By Paul P. Van Riper, Parliamentarian Senate Rules
    SUMMARY GUIDE TO SENATE AND PARLIAMENTARY PROCEDURE - Sept. 1999 by Paul P. Van Riper, Parliamentarian Senate Rules – Strategy and Tactics 1. Senate rules, like those of most assemblies, are designed to prevent surprises. They encourage decisions based on prior investigation rather than off-the-cuff debate and reaction. So, design your strategy and tactics accordingly. You won’t get immediate action on anything important unless you have a well drafted motion in hand and expect to carry three-fourths of the Senate with you based on a speech limited to ten minutes! But, if you can tolerate study and investigation and will look for allies, there are several promising alternatives. 2. So, do your subject matter homework till you have some fairly concrete data and the beginnings of a point of view or proposal, and start to look for support. 3. On procedure, consult the Speaker, the Parliamentarian or former Parliamentarians Stadelmann and Halter or request from the Senate staff a copy of the long form guidance by Stadelmann and myself titled Notes on Parliamentary Procedure; and consult the Senate Constitution and Bylaws. 4. Then try one or more of the following: a. Go to a standing committee member for help. b. Ask you department or college caucus to make a request of the Executive or other committee. c. Bring it up in the Committee of the Whole and request action. d. Petition the Executive Committee for action. e. Ask the Speaker to present your proposal as an emergency item. f. Under new business, rise and request item be put on the agenda for the next meeting (takes majority).
    [Show full text]
  • Legislative Procedure
    Wisconsin Legislative Reference Bureau Legislative Procedure Joseph Kreye, Legal Section Manager November 2015 Legislating in Wisconsin, No. 2 www.legis.wi.gov/lrb/ © 2015 Wisconsin Legislative Reference Bureau Legislating in Wisconsin by the Wisconsin Legislative Reference Bureau is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License. LEGISLATIVE PROCEDURE A state legislature operates under procedural rules that are based on the traditions and customs established by English parliamentary law. That parliamentary law is based in turn on the administrative practices of Anglo-Saxon tribes, practices that were well established hundreds of years before the Norman invasion of Britain in 1066. In 1801, Thomas Jefferson published a manual called Manual of Parliamentary Practice for the Use of the Senate of the United States, which applied these ancient customs, with substantial modifications, to the lawmaking process in the United States. Today, many legislative bodies rely on Mason’s Manual of Legislative Procedure as guidance for establishing legislative rules. Mason’s Manual, first published in 1935 and updated periodically since then, was designed specifically for state legislatures and, although it refers to the principles established in Jefferson’s manual, was based on an extensive study of legal and legislative precedents. Mason’s Manual posits the following ten principles that govern procedure in group decision-making: 1. The group must have the authority to take the action it purports to take. 2. The group must meet to make decisions. 3. All group members must receive proper notice of any meeting. 4. A quorum must be present at any meeting in order to conduct business.
    [Show full text]
  • Ments; Amendments in Nature of Substitute
    AMENDMENTS Ch. 27 § 25 amendment in the nature of a sub- tions proposing to strike out an stitute. entire pending portion (section or The Clerk read as follows: title) of text and to insert new Amendment in the nature of a matter and is not used to describe substitute offered by Mr. Wright: Strike out all after the enacting those motions to strike out and in- clause and insert in lieu thereof the sert which may be properly char- following: acterized as ‘‘perfecting amend- That the Intelligence Authoriza- ments’’ and which go only to a tion Act for Fiscal Year 1983 is amended by adding at the end there- portion of the pending text. of the following new title:... An amendment in the nature of MR. [HENRY J.] HYDE [of Illinois]: I a substitute for a bill may be pro- have an amendment that was printed posed before perfecting amend- in the Record. Will I be given an op- ments to the pending portion of portunity to offer it? the original text have been of- THE CHAIRMAN: (1) The Chair will ad- fered, but may not be voted on vise the gentleman that a printed per- until after such perfecting amend- fecting amendment to the bill can be (2) offered before the vote on the Wright ments have been disposed of. amendment in the nature of a sub- Amendments to a committee stitute. amendment in the nature of a Parliamentarian’s Note: In cases substitute are voted on before a such as that above, the perfecting substitute amendment, and the ef- amendment to the pending por- fect of the adoption of a substitute tion of the bill is voted on first.
    [Show full text]
  • I. Minutes II. Business Comments by Berkeley Division Chair William Drummond Procedural Motion Presented by Chair William Drummo
    Approved Minutes Special Meeting of the Berkeley Division Thursday, April 19, 2007 Page 1 of 9 APPROVED MINUTES OF SPECIAL MEETING* BERKELEY DIVISION OF THE ACADEMIC SENATE April 19, 2007 The Berkeley Division met on Thursday, April 19, 2007, in Booth Auditorium at Boalt Hall School of Law, pursuant to call. Professor William Drummond, chair of the Berkeley Division, presided, calling the meeting to order at 1:05 p.m. I. Minutes The minutes of the April 27, 2006 and the November 14, 2006 Division meetings were to be presented at the spring Division meeting immediately following this special meeting. II. Business Comments by Berkeley Division Chair William Drummond The special meeting was requested by 17 members of the Division who proposed two resolutions concerning the Energy Biosciences Institute (EBI) proposal as the business of the meeting. These resolutions were promptly posted online, but due to time constraints, no amendments or substitute resolutions were included in the notice. Any amendments or substitute resolutions raised from the floor could be considered during the meeting. Chair Drummond reviewed parliamentary procedures according to Robert’s Rules of Order. An amendment limiting the scope of the main motion would require a simple majority to act upon it. An amendment outside the scope of the main motion could be considered by unanimous consent, but any action would require a two-thirds majority. Amendments to resolved clauses would be considered and disposed of before moving to the whereas clauses. The agenda was approved without objection. Professor Anne Wagner (Art History) would speak on behalf of the group.
    [Show full text]