Problem Set #12, Chem 340, Fall 2013 – Due Wednesday, Dec 4, 2013 Please Show All Work for Credit to Hand In: Ionic Equilibria: –4 1

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Problem Set #12, Chem 340, Fall 2013 – Due Wednesday, Dec 4, 2013 Please Show All Work for Credit to Hand In: Ionic Equilibria: –4 1 Problem Set #12, Chem 340, Fall 2013 – Due Wednesday, Dec 4, 2013 Please show all work for credit To hand in: Ionic equilibria: –4 1. Calculate the value of m± in 5.0 10 molal solutions of (a) KCl, (b) Ca(NO3) 2, and (c) ZnSO4. Assume complete dissociation. a) KCl 1 vv v m= v v m 41 mm = 1 5.0 10 molkg b) Ca(NO3)2 1 vv v m= v v m 11 mm= 4 33 4 5.0 104 molkg 1 7.9 10 4 molkg 1 c) ZnSO4 1 vv v m= v v m 1 mm= 1 2 5.0 1041 molkg 2. Calculate ±, and a±for a 0.0325 m solution of K4Fe(CN) 6 at 298 K. m 2 21 2 2 I v z v z m z m z 22 1 I 4 0.0325 mol kg1 4 2 0.0325 mol kg 1 0.325 mol kg 1 2 I ln 1.173zz 1.173 4 0.325 2.6749 mol kg1 0.069 1 1 vv v 45 1 1 m= v v m 4 0.0325 mol kg 0.099 mol kg m a 0.099 0.069 0.0068 m –3 3. Chloroacetic acid has a dissociation constant of Ka = 1.38 10 . (a) Calculate the degree of dissociation for a 0.0825 m solution of this acid using the Debye–Hückel limiting law. (b) Calculate the degree of dissociation for a 0.0825 m solution of this acid that is also 0.022 m in KCl using the Debye–Hückel limiting law. –3 a) Ka = 1.38 10 0.0825 m 22 mm m 3 Ka 1.38 10 mm0.0825 when = 1 m21.1385 10 4 1.38 10 3 m m21.38 10 3 m 1.1385 10 4 0 2 1.38 103 1.38 10 3 4 1 1.1385 10 4 m 0.0100 molkg1 2 m Im2 0.0100 molkg1 2 ln 1.173 1 0.0100 0.1173 0.8893 when = 0.8893 m21.43956 10 4 1.7449 10 3 m m21.7449 10 3 m 1.43956 10 4 0 2 1.7449 103 1.7449 10 3 4 1 1.43956 10 4 m 0.0112 molkg1 2 m Im2 0.0112 molkg1 2 ln 1.173 1 0.0112 0.1239 Same value, done! 0.8835 when = 0.8835 m21.4587 10 4 1.7681 10 3 m m21.7681 10 3 m 1.4587 10 4 0 2 1.7681 103 1.7681 10 3 4 1 1.4587 10 4 m 0.0112 molkg1 2 I 0.0112 molkg1 ln 1.173 1 0.0112 0.1239 0.0112 The degre of dissociation is 100% 13.6% 0.0825 b) + K Cl 1 1 zz1 1 1 I 0.022 molkg from the KCl alone. We first calculate the activity coefficient using this value. 0.022 I 1 0.022 molkg1 2 ln 1.173 1 0.022 0.1740 0.8403 We next calculate the concentration of the ions produced through the dissociation of the acid in the solution. m2 0.84032 1.38 103 0.0825 m m2 1.9544 103 0.0825 m m21.6124 10 4 1.9544 10 3 m m21.9544 10 3 m 1.6124 10 4 0 2 1.9544 103 1.9544 10 3 4 1 1.6124 10 4 m 0.01176 molkg1 2 The ionic strength is the sum of that due to the chloroacetic acid and the KCl or 1 I = 0.022 + 0.012 = 0.034 molkg . We recalculate using this value for the ionic strength. ln 1.173 1 0.034 0.2163 0.8055 and recalculate m m2 0.80552 1.38 103 giving 0.0825 m 1 m 0.01222 molkg Given the fact that the concentration of KCl is only known to 2 significant figures, this value of m is sufficiently close to the previous value that a further iteration is not 0.01222 14.8%. necessary. The degree of dissociation is 0.0825 4. The principal ions of human blood plasma and their molar concentrations are m 0.14 m, m 0.10 m, m 0.025 m. Calculate the ionic strength Na Cl HCO 3 of blood plasma. Note: obviously something missing, pos-neg imbalance 1 2 1 2 2 2 I mi zi 0.14 m1 0.10 m1 0.025 m1 0.1325 m 2 i 2 5. The oxidation of NADH by molecular oxygen occurs in the cellular respiratory system: + + O2 (g) + 2NADH(aq) + 2H (aq) 2H2O(l) + 2NAD (aq) Using the information in Table 9.7, calculate the standard Gibbs energy change that results from the oxidation of NADH by molecular oxygen. The standard reduction potential for nicotine adenine dinucleotide is NAD aq H aq 2e NADH aq E 0.320V Using the half cell reactions: E 0.320 V Oxidation: 2 NADH 2 NAD 2 H 4 e 0 E 0.815 V Reduction: O2 4H 4 e 2 H2O 0 Ecell = Ered + Eox = 1.135 V ΔG n F Δφ 496485 C mol-1 1.135 V 438.0 kJ mol-1 reaction 6. Determine Ksp for AgBr at 298.15 K using the electrochemical cell described by Ag s AgBr s Br aq, a Ag aq, a Ag s . The half cell and overall Br Ag reactions are AgBr + e– → Ag + Br– Eº = +0.07133 V Ag → Ag+ + e– Eº = –0.7996 V AgBr → Ag+ + Br– Eº = –0.72827 V nE 0.729 V logK 12.310 10 sp 0.05916 0.05916 V K 4.90 1013 sp 7. For a given overall cell reaction, S 17.5 J mol1 K1 and H 225.0 kJ mol1. R R ° E Calculate E and . T P GHTS 225000 J mol1 298.15 K 17.5 J K 1 mol 1 E RRR 2.38 V nF nF 1 96485 Cmol1 11 E SR 17.5 J K mol 41 1 = 1.81 10 V K TP nF 1 96485 Cmol 8. The following data have been obtained for the potential of the cell PtsH g, f 1 atmHCl aq, mAgClsAgs as a function of m at 25°C. 2 m (molkg–1) E (V) m (mol kg–1) E (V) m (mol kg–1) E (V) 0.00100 0.597915 0.0200 0.43024 0.500 0.27231 0.00200 0.54425 0.0500 0.38588 1.000 0.23328 0.00500 0.49846 0.100 0.35241 1.500 0.20719 0.0100 0.46417 0.200 0.31874 2.000 0.18631 ° Calculate E and ± for HCl at m = 0.00100, 0.0100, 0.100, and 1.000. + – Cell reaction: 2AgCl(s) + H2(g) 2Ag(s) + 2H (aq) + 2Cl (aq) RT2 RT E E ln a a E ln a a 2FF H Cl H Cl a a a2 2 m 2 H Cl 22RT m RT EE ln ln F m F In the low concentration limit we can use the Debye-Hückel result mm ln 0.50926log10 1.172614ln mm Therefore, for dilute solutions 22RT m RT m EEln 1.172614 F m F m 2RT m m E ln Using this result, a plot of Fm (y axis) vs. m (x axis) will have an intercept of E . We use the data up to m = 0.100, as the Debye-Hückel model is not valid for more concentrated solutions. m E m m m 0.001 0.031623 0.57915 0.224212 0.002 0.044721 0.54425 0.224909 0.005 0.070711 0.49846 0.226203 0.010 0.1 0.46417 0.227531 0.020 0.141421 0.43024 0.229218 0.050 0.223607 0.38588 0.231943 0.100 0.316228 0.35241 0.234090 The data in the table is graphed below. The best fit line gives a value for E of 0.223665 V. Given we can now find from Fm ln EE ln RT m E 0.223655 V ln mm 0.001 –0.010654 0.989 0.010 –0.0755112 0.927 0.100 –0.203036 0.816 9. A fuel cell develops an electric potential from the chemical reaction between reagents supplied from an outside source. What is the cell potential of a cell fuelled by (a) hydrogen and oxygen, (b) the combustion of butane at 1.0 bar and 298 K? E 10. Consider the cell, Zn(s)|ZnCl2 (0.0050 mol kg−1)|Hg2Cl2(s)|Hg(l), for which the − 2+ cell reaction is Hg2Cl2(s) + Zn(s)→2 Hg(l) + 2 Cl (aq) + Zn (aq). o 2+ o Given that E (Zn ,Zn) = −0.7628 V, E (Hg2Cl2,Hg) = +0.2676 V, and that the cell potential is +1.2272 V, (a) write the Nernst equation for the cell. Determine (b) the standard cell potential, (c) ΔrG, ΔrGo, and K for the cell reaction, (d) the mean ionic activity and activity coefficient of ZnCl2 from the measured cell potential, and (e) the mean ionic activity coefficient of ZnCl2 from the Debye–Hückel limiting law. (f ) −1 Given that (∂Ecell /∂T)p = −4.52 × 10−4 V K , calculate ΔrS and ΔrH. 11. The standard potentials of proteins are not commonly measured by the methods described in this chapter because proteins often lose their native structure and function when they react on the surfaces of electrodes. In an alternative method, the oxidized protein is allowed to react with an appropriate electron donor in solution.
Recommended publications
  • Nernst Equation in Electrochemistry the Nernst Equation Gives the Reduction Potential of a Half‐Cell in Equilibrium
    Nernst equation In electrochemistry the Nernst equation gives the reduction potential of a half‐cell in equilibrium. In further cases, it can also be used to determine the emf (electromotive force) for a full electrochemical cell. (half‐cell reduction potential) (total cell potential) where Ered is the half‐cell reduction potential at a certain T o E red is the standard half‐cell reduction potential Ecell is the cell potential (electromotive force) o E cell is the standard cell potential at a certain T R is the universal gas constant: R = 8.314472(15) JK−1mol−1 T is the absolute temperature in Kelvin a is the chemical activity for the relevant species, where aRed is the reductant and aOx is the oxidant F is the Faraday constant; F = 9.64853399(24)×104 Cmol−1 z is the number of electrons transferred in the cell reaction or half‐reaction Q is the reaction quotient (e.g. molar concentrations, partial pressures …) As the system is considered not to have reached equilibrium, the reaction quotient Q is used instead of the equilibrium constant k. The electrochemical series is used to determine the electrochemical potential or the electrode potential of an electrochemical cell. These electrode potentials are measured relatively to the standard hydrogen electrode. A reduced member of a couple has a thermodynamic tendency to reduce the oxidized member of any couple that lies above it in the series. The standard hydrogen electrode is a redox electrode which forms the basis of the thermodynamic scale of these oxidation‐ reduction potentials. For a comparison with all other electrode reactions, standard electrode potential E0 of hydrogen is defined to be zero at all temperatures.
    [Show full text]
  • Units of Free Energy and Electrochemical Cell Potentials Notes on General Chemistry
    Units of free energy and electrochemical cell potentials Notes on General Chemistry http://quantum.bu.edu/notes/GeneralChemistry/FreeEnergyUnits.pdf Last updated Wednesday, March 15, 2006 9:45:57-05:00 Copyright © 2006 Dan Dill ([email protected]) Department of Chemistry, Boston University, Boston MA 02215 "The devil is in the details." Units of DG for chemical transformations There is a subtlety about the relation between DG and K, namely how DG changes when the amounts of reactants and products change. Gibbs free energy G = H - TS is an extensive quantity, that is, it depends on how much of the system we have, since H and S are both extensive (T is intensive). This means if we double the reactants and products, 2 a A V 2 b B then DG must also double, but the expression DG = RTln Q K found in textbooks does not seem to contain the amounts of reactants and products! In fact it does contain these, because theH êstoichiometricL coefficients appear as exponents in Q and K. Thereby, doubling the moles of reactants and products will change Q and K into their square, which will double DG. Here is how. DG doubled = RTln Q2 K2 = RTln Q K 2 H = 2LRTln Q K H ê L = 2 DG original H ê L This result evidently means thatH ê L H L the units of DG are energy, not energy per mole, but with the understanding that it is the change in Gibbs free energy per mole of reaction as written. The question arises, why is this not taken account by the explicit units in the equation for DG? The answer is that the appropriate unit has been omitted.
    [Show full text]
  • Dissociation Constants of Oxalic Acid in Aqueous Sodium Chloride and Sodium Trifluoromethanesulfonate Media to 175 °C
    View metadata, citation and similar papers at core.ac.uk brought to you by CORE provided by DigitalCommons@University of Nebraska University of Nebraska - Lincoln DigitalCommons@University of Nebraska - Lincoln Earth and Atmospheric Sciences, Department Papers in the Earth and Atmospheric Sciences of 1998 Dissociation Constants of Oxalic Acid in Aqueous Sodium Chloride and Sodium Trifluoromethanesulfonate Media to 175 °C Richard Kettler University of Nebraska-Lincoln, [email protected] David J. Wesolowski Oak Ridge National Laboratory Donald A. Palmer Oak Ridge National Laboratory Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.unl.edu/geosciencefacpub Part of the Earth Sciences Commons Kettler, Richard; Wesolowski, David J.; and Palmer, Donald A., "Dissociation Constants of Oxalic Acid in Aqueous Sodium Chloride and Sodium Trifluoromethanesulfonate Media to 175 °C" (1998). Papers in the Earth and Atmospheric Sciences. 135. https://digitalcommons.unl.edu/geosciencefacpub/135 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the Earth and Atmospheric Sciences, Department of at DigitalCommons@University of Nebraska - Lincoln. It has been accepted for inclusion in Papers in the Earth and Atmospheric Sciences by an authorized administrator of DigitalCommons@University of Nebraska - Lincoln. J. Chem. Eng. Data 1998, 43, 337-350 337 Dissociation Constants of Oxalic Acid in Aqueous Sodium Chloride and Sodium Trifluoromethanesulfonate Media to 175 °C Richard M. Kettler*,† Department of Geology, University of Nebraska, Lincoln, Nebraska 68588-0340 David J. Wesolowski‡ and Donald A. Palmer§ Chemical and Analytical Sciences Division, Oak Ridge National Laboratory, Oak Ridge, Tennessee 37831-6110 The first and second molal dissociation constants of oxalic acid were measured potentiometrically in a concentration cell fitted with hydrogen electrodes.
    [Show full text]
  • Ch.14-16 Electrochemistry Redox Reaction
    Redox Reaction - the basics ox + red <=> red + ox Ch.14-16 1 2 1 2 Oxidizing Reducing Electrochemistry Agent Agent Redox reactions: involve transfer of electrons from one species to another. Oxidizing agent (oxidant): takes electrons Reducing agent (reductant): gives electrons Redox Reaction - the basics Balance Redox Reactions (Half Reactions) Reduced Oxidized 1. Write down the (two half) reactions. ox1 + red2 <=> red1 + ox2 2. Balance the (half) reactions (Mass and Charge): a. Start with elements other than H and O. Oxidizing Reducing Agent Agent b. Balance O by adding water. c. balance H by adding H+. Redox reactions: involve transfer of electrons from one d. Balancing charge by adding electrons. species to another. (3. Multiply each half reaction to make the number of Oxidizing agent (oxidant): takes electrons electrons equal. Reducing agent (reductant): gives electrons 4. Add the reactions and simplify.) Fe3+ + V2+ → Fe2+ + V3 + Example: Balance the two half reactions and redox Important Redox Titrants and the Reactions reaction equation of the titration of an acidic solution of Na2C2O4 (sodium oxalate, colorless) with KMnO4 (deep purple). Oxidizing Reagents (Oxidants) - 2- 2+ MnO4 (qa ) + C2O4 (qa ) → Mn (qa ) + CO2(g) (1)Potassium Permanganate +qa -qa 2-qa 16H ( ) + 2MnO4 ( ) + 5C2O4 ( ) → − + − 2+ 2+ MnO 4 +8H +5 e → Mn + 4 H2 O 2Mn (qa ) + 8H2O(l) + 10CO2( g) MnO − +4H+ + 3 e − → MnO( s )+ 2 H O Example: Balance 4 2 2 Sn2+ + Fe3+ <=> Sn4+ + Fe2+ − − 2− MnO4 + e→ MnO4 2+ - 3+ 2+ Fe + MnO4 <=> Fe + Mn 1 Important Redox Titrants
    [Show full text]
  • Nernst Equation - Wikipedia 1 of 10
    Nernst equation - Wikipedia 1 of 10 Nernst equation In electrochemistry, the Nernst equation is an equation that relates the reduction potential of an electrochemical reaction (half-cell or full cell reaction) to the standard electrode potential, temperature, and activities (often approximated by concentrations) of the chemical species undergoing reduction and oxidation. It was named after Walther Nernst, a German physical chemist who formulated the equation.[1][2] Contents Expression Nernst potential Derivation Using Boltzmann factor Using thermodynamics (chemical potential) Relation to equilibrium Limitations Time dependence of the potential Significance to related scientific domains See also References External links Expression A quantitative relationship between cell potential and concentration of the ions Ox + z e− → Red standard thermodynamics says that the actual free energy change ΔG is related to the free o energy change under standard state ΔG by the relationship: where Qr is the reaction quotient. The cell potential E associated with the electrochemical reaction is defined as the decrease in Gibbs free energy per coulomb of charge transferred, which leads to the relationship . The constant F (the Faraday constant) is a unit conversion factor F = NAq, where NA is Avogadro's number and q is the fundamental https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nernst_equation Nernst equation - Wikipedia 2 of 10 electron charge. This immediately leads to the Nernst equation, which for an electrochemical half-cell is . For a complete electrochemical reaction
    [Show full text]
  • Modelling and Experimental Analysis of a Polymer Electrolyte Membrane Water Electrolysis Cell at Different Operating Temperatures
    Article Modelling and Experimental Analysis of a Polymer Electrolyte Membrane Water Electrolysis Cell at Different Operating Temperatures Vincenzo Liso 1,*, Giorgio Savoia 1, Samuel Simon Araya 1, Giovanni Cinti 2 and Søren Knudsen Kær 1 1 Department of Energy Technology, Aalborg University, 9220 Aalborg, Denmark; [email protected] (G.S.); [email protected] (S.S.A.); [email protected] (S.K.K.) 2 Department of Engineering, Universitá degli Studi di Perugia, 06125 Perugia PG, Italy; (G.C.) [email protected] * Correspondence: [email protected]; Tel.: +45-2137-0207 Received: 23 October 2018; Accepted: 20 November 2018; Published: 23 November 2018 Abstract: In this paper, a simplified model of a Polymer Electrolyte Membrane (PEM) water electrolysis cell is presented and compared with experimental data at 60 °C and 80 °C. The model utilizes the same modelling approach used in previous work where the electrolyzer cell is divided in four subsections: cathode, anode, membrane and voltage. The model of the electrodes includes key electrochemical reactions and gas transport mechanism (i.e., H2, O2 and H2O) whereas the model of the membrane includes physical mechanisms such as water diffusion, electro osmotic drag and hydraulic pressure. Voltage was modelled including main overpotentials (i.e., activation, ohmic, concentration). First and second law efficiencies were defined. Key empirical parameters depending on temperature were identified in the activation and ohmic overpotentials. The electrodes reference exchange current densities and change transfer coefficients were related to activation overpotentials whereas hydrogen ion diffusion to Ohmic overvoltages. These model parameters were empirically fitted so that polarization curve obtained by the model predicted well the voltage at different current found by the experimental results.
    [Show full text]
  • Essentials of Ph Measurement
    Essentials of pH Measurement Tim Meirose, Technical Sales Manager Thermo Scientific Electrochemistry Products The world leader in serving science What is pH? • The Theoretical Definition pH = - log aH • aH is the free hydrogen ion activity in a sample, not total ions. • In solutions that contain other ions, activity and concentration are not the same. The activity is an effective concentration of hydrogen ions, rather than the true concentration; it accounts for the fact that other ions surrounding the hydrogen ions will shield them and affect their ability to participate in chemical reactions. • These other ions effectively change the hydrogen ion concentration in any process that involves H+. pH electrodes are an ISE for hydrogen. 2 What is pH? • pH = “Potential Hydrogen” or Power of Hydrogen • The pH of pure water around room temperature is about 7. This is considered "neutral" because the concentration of hydrogen ions (H+) is exactly equal to the concentration of hydroxide (OH-) ions produced by dissociation of the water. • Increasing the concentration of H+ in relation to OH- produces a solution with a pH of less than 7, and the solution is considered "acidic". • Decreasing the concentration H+ in relation to OH- produces a solution with a pH above 7, and the solution is considered "alkaline" or "basic". OH- + H+ - H OH - + - OH H+ H OH H+ H+ H+ - OH OH- H+ OH- OH- + - LOW pH = LOTS OF H LOTS OF OH = HIGH pH 3 What is pH? Representative pH values • The pH Scale Substance pH Hydrochloric Acid, 10M -1.0 Lead-acid battery 0.5 Gastric acid 1.5 – 2.0 • Each pH unit is a factor 10 in Lemon juice 2.4 + [H ] Cola 2.5 • pH of Cola is about 2.5.
    [Show full text]
  • Galvanic Cells and the Nernst Equation
    Exercise 7 Page 1 Illinois Central College CHEMISTRY 132 Name:___________________________ Laboratory Section: _______ Galvanic Cells and the Nernst Equation Equipment Voltage probe wires 0.1 M solutions of Pb(NO3)2, Fe(NO3)3, and KNO3 sandpaper or steel wool 0.1 M solutions of Cu(NO3)2 and Zn(NO3)2 plastic document protector 1.0 M solutions of Cu(NO3)2 and Zn(NO3)2 6 x 1.5 cm strips of filter paper Cu(NO3)2: 0.010 M, 0.0010 M, and 0.00010 M Objectives. The objectives of this experiment are to develop an understanding of the "Electrochemical Series" and to illustrate the use the Nernst Equation. Background Any chemical reaction involving the transfer of electrons from one substance to another is an oxidation-reduction (redox) reaction. The substance losing electrons is oxidized while the substance gaining electrons is reduced. Let us consider the following redox reaction: +2 +2 Zn(s) + Pb (aq) Zn (aq) + Pb(s) This redox reaction can be divided into an oxidation and a reduction half-reaction. +2 -1 Zn(s) Zn (aq) + 2 e oxidation half-reaction +2 -1 Pb (aq) + 2 e Pb(s) reduction half-reaction A galvanic cell (Figure 1.) is a device used to separate a redox reaction into its two component half-reactions in such a way that the electrons are forced to travel through an external circuit rather than by direct contact of the oxidizing agent and reducing agent. This transfer of electrons through an external circuit is electricity. Figure 1. Exercise 7 Page 2 Each side of the galvanic cell is known as a half-cell.
    [Show full text]
  • Nernst Equation, Equlibrium and Potential
    nernst.mcd 6/12/97 Nernst Equation, Equlibrium and Potential Starting with the Nernst Equation for the equlibrium; Ox + n e- <--> Red : R.T C ox E E .ln Typical form of Nernst Equation cell std_cell . n F C red n.F C ox Rearange E E . ln cell std_cell . R T C red n.F E E . C ox cell std_cell . e R T Gives the ratio of oxidized to C red reduced form of redox pair. n.F ( DE). C ox . e R T Reduced variables to DE, the C red difference between the equlibrium potential and the applied potential. This function describes how the equlibrium ration of oxidized and reduced form depend upon the applied potential. Notice that if DE = 0 Where the applied potential is the same as the standard cell potential. Then the exponent is 0, so the ratio of Cox/Cred = 1. This is the conditions for the standard state. If DE > 0 Where the applied potential is positive of Eo. Now the exponent is greater than 0 so the ratio of Cox/Cred >1. The concentration of the oxidized form is greater than the concentration of the reduced form. This is consistent with the half reaction because an applied potential positive of Eo pulls e-'s off and causes oxidation. If DE < 0. Where the applied potential is negative of Eo. Now the exponent is less than 0 so the ratio of Cox/Cred < 1. The concentration of the oxidized form is less than the concentration of the reduced form. This is consistent with the half reaction because an applied potential negative of Eo pushes e-'s on and causes reduction.
    [Show full text]
  • A Concise Model for Evaluating Water Electrolysis
    international journal of hydrogen energy 36 (2011) 14335e14341 Available at www.sciencedirect.com journal homepage: www.elsevier.com/locate/he A concise model for evaluating water electrolysis Muzhong Shen a,*, Nick Bennett a, Yulong Ding b, Keith Scott c a Department of Mechanical & Design Engineering, University of Portsmouth, Portsmouth PO1 3DJ, UK b School of Process, Environmental and Materials Engineering, University of Leeds, Leeds LS2 9JT, UK c School of Chemical Engineering and Advanced Materials, University of Newcastle upon Tyne, Newcastle upon Tyne NE1 7RU, UK article info abstract Article history: To evaluate water electrolysis in hydrogen production, a concise model was developed to Received 30 July 2010 analyze the currentevoltage characteristics of an electrolytic cell. This model describes the Received in revised form water electrolysis capability by means of incorporating thermodynamic, kinetic and elec- 2 December 2010 trical resistance effects. These three effects are quantitatively expressed with three main Accepted 7 December 2010 parameters; the thermodynamic parameter which is the water dissociation potential; the Available online 15 September 2011 kinetic parameter which reflects the overall electrochemical kinetic effect of both elec- trodes in the electrolytic cell, and the ohmic parameter which reflects the total resistance Keywords: of the electrolytic cell. Using the model, different electrolytic cells with various operating Water electrolysis conditions can be conveniently compared with each other. The modeling results are found Hydrogen production to agree well with experimental data and previous published work. Electrochemical kinetics Copyright ª 2010, Hydrogen Energy Publications, LLC. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights Concise model reserved. ButlereVolmer equation 1. Introduction The water electrolysis performance is normally evaluated with the currentevoltage characteristics of an electrolytic cell Hydrogen is a clean fuel for fuel cell applications.
    [Show full text]
  • Investigating the Nernst Equation
    Investigating the Nernst Equation HOW DOES THE EMF OF A GALVANIC CELL CHANGE WITH THE CHANGE IN CONCENTRATION OF COPPER SULPHATE ELECTROLYTE? RAAHISH KALARIA Contents 1 Introduction .................................................................................................................................... 2 2 Research Question .......................................................................................................................... 5 3 Hypothesis ....................................................................................................................................... 5 4 Variables.......................................................................................................................................... 5 4.1 Independent Variable ............................................................................................................. 5 4.2 Dependent Variable ................................................................................................................ 6 4.3 Controlled Variables ................................................................................................................ 6 5 Apparatus ........................................................................................................................................ 8 6 Pre-Lab Preparation ........................................................................................................................ 9 6.1 Preparing the Salt Bridge .......................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Dissociation Constants of Oxalic Acid in Aqueous Sodium Chloride and Sodium Trifluoromethanesulfonate Media to 175 °C
    University of Nebraska - Lincoln DigitalCommons@University of Nebraska - Lincoln Earth and Atmospheric Sciences, Department Papers in the Earth and Atmospheric Sciences of 1998 Dissociation Constants of Oxalic Acid in Aqueous Sodium Chloride and Sodium Trifluoromethanesulfonate Media to 175 °C Richard Kettler University of Nebraska-Lincoln, [email protected] David J. Wesolowski Oak Ridge National Laboratory Donald A. Palmer Oak Ridge National Laboratory Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.unl.edu/geosciencefacpub Part of the Earth Sciences Commons Kettler, Richard; Wesolowski, David J.; and Palmer, Donald A., "Dissociation Constants of Oxalic Acid in Aqueous Sodium Chloride and Sodium Trifluoromethanesulfonate Media to 175 °C" (1998). Papers in the Earth and Atmospheric Sciences. 135. https://digitalcommons.unl.edu/geosciencefacpub/135 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the Earth and Atmospheric Sciences, Department of at DigitalCommons@University of Nebraska - Lincoln. It has been accepted for inclusion in Papers in the Earth and Atmospheric Sciences by an authorized administrator of DigitalCommons@University of Nebraska - Lincoln. J. Chem. Eng. Data 1998, 43, 337-350 337 Dissociation Constants of Oxalic Acid in Aqueous Sodium Chloride and Sodium Trifluoromethanesulfonate Media to 175 °C Richard M. Kettler*,† Department of Geology, University of Nebraska, Lincoln, Nebraska 68588-0340 David J. Wesolowski‡ and Donald A. Palmer§ Chemical and Analytical Sciences Division, Oak Ridge National Laboratory, Oak Ridge, Tennessee 37831-6110 The first and second molal dissociation constants of oxalic acid were measured potentiometrically in a concentration cell fitted with hydrogen electrodes. Measurements were made at six temperatures ranging -1 -1 from 5 °C to 125 °C at four ionic strengths ranging from 0.1 mol‚kg to 1.0 mol‚kg (NaCl and NaCF3- SO3).
    [Show full text]