DOCSLIB.ORG

The Federal Common Law of Nations

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
The Federal Common Law of Nations GW Law Faculty Publications & Other Works Faculty Scholarship 2009 The Federal Common Law of Nations Bradford R. Clark George Washington University Law School, [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: https://scholarship.law.gwu.edu/faculty_publications Part of the Law Commons Recommended Citation Bradford R. Clark, The Federal Common Law of Nations, 109 Colum. L. Rev. 1 (2009). This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the Faculty Scholarship at Scholarly Commons. It has been accepted for inclusion in GW Law Faculty Publications & Other Works by an authorized administrator of Scholarly Commons. For more information, please contact [email protected]. \\server05\productn\C\COL\109-1\toc1091.txt unknown Seq: 1 22-DEC-08 11:13 COLUMBIA LAW REVIEW VOL. 109 JANUARY 2009 NO. 1 CONTENTS ARTICLE THE FEDERAL COMMON LAW OF NATIONS Anthony J. Bellia Jr. 1 Bradford R. Clark NOTES DISCERNING DISCRIMINATION IN STATE TREATMENT OF AMERICAN INDIANS GOING BEYOND RESERVATION BOUNDARIES Shira Kieval 94 MORE BITTER THAN SWEET: A PROCEDURAL DUE PROCESS CRITIQUE OF CERTIFICATION PERIODS Amy McCamphill 138 ESSAY THE SUBJECTIVE EXPERIENCE OF PUNISHMENT Adam J. Kolber 182 Electronic copy available at: http://ssrn.com/abstract=1346554 \\server05\productn\C\COL\109-1\boe1091.txt unknown Seq: 8 22-DEC-08 11:13 COLUMBIA LAW REVIEW VOL. 109 JANUARY 2009 NO. 1 Z.W. JULIUS CHEN Editor-in-Chief MATTHEW GURGEL JASON VITULLO DANIELLA LICHTMAN ESSES KAREN LIN JESSIE CHENG Executive Articles Executive Sidebar Executive Essay & Executive Executive Notes Editor Editor Review Editor Managing Editor Editor DAVID ABRAMOWICZ SAMEER BAJAJ BRANDON C. MASON MICHAEL CABIN BENJAMIN J. BEATON KARA MAGUIRE BRYAN MCARDLE JOHN KOERNER SHIRA KIEVAL Managing Editors KABIR MASSON CHRISTOPHER A. MULLER AMY MCCAMPHILL EMILY ROSSI ANDREW BRANTINGHAM Notes Editors ROBERT A. WEINSTOCK EMILY BUSSIGEL THANE REHN Articles Editors Essay & Review Editors SHELBY R. SCHWARTZ T. ALORA THOMAS JENNIFER PHILBRICK Alumni Liaison & Senior Editor EMILY WEISS Bluebook & Sidebar Editors Senior Editor PAWAN NELSON RONNI WEINSTEIN JESSICA KARP SCOTT BUELL Operations & Staff Development & Milligan Fellowship Librarian & Senior Editor Senior Editor Coordinator & Senior Editor Senior Editor KEVIN ANGLE EILEEN PLAZA CORY BULAND ANDREW LEGRAND RYAN REYNOLDS ETHAN FRECHETTE C. DEREK LIU BENJAMIN ROTHSTEIN KIRSTEN JACKSON ADRIANA LUCIANO NOAH SOLOWIEJCZYK Senior Editors Staff J. ROBERT ABRAHAM MARTHA U. FULFORD DAVID H. PENNINGTON HARRIET M. ANTCZAK MATTHEW GUARNIERI CAROL J. PERRY OMOLARA N. BEWAJI ANDREW S. HABER ZOE PERSHING-FOLEY ESHA BHANDARI STEPHEN F. HAYES DEVI M. RAO DANIEL W. BUTRYMOWICZ EZEKIEL L. HILL SAMUEL C. SALGANIK ADAM CARLIS AMANDA HUNGERFORD SANNU K. SHRESTHA ELEANOR G. CARR ALFONSO A. JIMENEZ ANGELA A. SMEDLEY ADRIEL I. CEPEDA DERIEUX MICHAEL C. MARTINEZ ERIN FOLEY SMITH JESSE M. CREED CAITLIN MCCUSKER JENNIFER B. SOKOLER DANA M. DELGER ADAM G. MEHES DAVID H. TUTOR ELIZABETH R. DOISY MARGOT A. MILLER CURTIS R. WALDO SCOTT A. EISMAN MINA NASSERI EMILY S. WALL ROBERT BRENT FERGUSON JEONG M. OH ADAM B. WEISS ANNA S. FLEDER MARGARET CLAIRE O’SULLIVAN CHRISTINA M. WOEHR KATHLEEN CHOJNICKI GUILLERMO CACERES´ INES´ DUBBELS Business Manager Project Coordinator Assistant Business Manager Directors of the Columbia Law Review Association, Inc. PETER BUSCEMI GILLIAN METZGER DAVID SCHIZER PETER CANELLOS NORY MILLER ARUN SUBRAMANIAN LOUIS LOWENSTEIN KARIN S. PORTLOCK, ex officio JOELLEN VALENTINE GERARD LYNCH WILLIAM SAVITT LEWIS YELIN Electronic copy available at: http://ssrn.com/abstract=1346554 \\server05\productn\C\COL\109-1\COL101.txt unknown Seq: 1 22-DEC-08 11:13 COLUMBIA LAW REVIEW VOL. 109 JANUARY 2009 NO. 1 ARTICLE THE FEDERAL COMMON LAW OF NATIONS Anthony J. Bellia Jr.* Bradford R. Clark** Courts and scholars have vigorously debated the proper role of custom- ary international law in American courts: To what extent should it be con- sidered federal common law, state law, or general law? The debate has reached something of an impasse, in part because various positions rely on, but also are in tension with, historical practice and constitutional structure. This Article describes the role that the law of nations actually has played throughout American history. In keeping with the original constitutional design, federal courts for much of that history enforced certain rules respect- ing other nations’ “perfect rights” (or close analogues) under the law of na- tions as an incident of political branch recognition of foreign nations, and in order to restrain the judiciary and the states from giving other nations just cause for war against the United States. Rather than viewing enforcement of the law of nations as an Article III power to fashion federal common law, federal courts have instead applied rules derived from the law of nations as a way to implement the political branches’ Article I and Article II powers to recognize foreign nations, conduct foreign relations, and decide momentous questions of war and peace. This allocation of powers approach best ex- plains the most important federal cases involving the law of nations across American history. This Article does not attempt to settle all questions of how customary international law interacts with the federal system. It does aspire, however, to recover largely forgotten historical and structural context crucial to any proper resolution of such questions. INTRODUCTION .................................................. 2 R I. THE LAW OF NATIONS AND THE ENGLISH SYSTEM ........... 9 R * Professor of Law and Notre Dame Presidential Fellow, Notre Dame Law School. ** William Cranch Research Professor of Law, George Washington University Law School. We thank Amy Barrett, Tricia Bellia, Curt Bradley, Rachel Brewster, Paolo Carozza, Doug Cassel, Michael Collins, Lori Damrosch, Rick Garnett, Jack Goldsmith, Kent Greenawalt, Philip Hamburger, Vicki Jackson, Bill Kelley, Thomas Lee, John Manning, Maeva Marcus, Jon Molot, Henry Monaghan, David Moore, Trevor Morrison, Sean Murphy, John Nagle, Mary Ellen O’Connell, Mike Ramsey, Jonathan Siegel, Ralph Steinhardt, Ed Swaine, Amanda Tyler, Carlos Vazquez,´ Julian Velasco, and Art Wilmarth for extremely helpful suggestions; the Columbia and George Washington Law School faculties for insightful comments at workshops; Notre Dame research librarian Patti Ogden for expert assistance; Jonathan Bond, Sean Dudley, and Krista Yee for excellent research assistance; and Benjamin Beaton for careful editing. 1 \\server05\productn\C\COL\109-1\COL101.txt unknown Seq: 2 22-DEC-08 11:13 2 COLUMBIA LAW REVIEW [Vol. 109:1 A. Defining Municipal Law and the Law of Nations ...... 11 R 1. Municipal Law ................................... 11 R 2. The Law of Nations .............................. 15 R B. Municipal Law and the Law of Nations as Rules of Decision ............................................. 20 R 1. The Law Merchant’s Adaptability ................. 20 R 2. The Law Maritime’s Sphere of Operation......... 22 R 3. The Law of State-State Relations .................. 24 R C. The Law of Nations and Crown Prerogatives in Foreign Relations ............................................ 26 R II. THE LAW OF NATIONS AND THE UNITED STATES CONSTITUTION ........................................... 28 R A. The Law of Nations and Pre-constitutional State Practice .............................................. 29 R B. The Foreign Relations Powers of the Federal Political Branches ............................................ 31 R C. Foreign Relations and the Judicial Branch ............ 33 R 1. The Supremacy of Federal Enactments ........... 34 R 2. Enforcement of the Law of Nations .............. 37 R 3. Early Limitations on Judicial Enforcement ........ 44 R III. EARLY ENFORCEMENT OF THE LAW OF NATIONS ............. 46 R A. The Early Debate over Federal Reception of the Common Law........................................ 47 R B. Upholding the Constitution’s Allocation of Powers . 55 R 1. Avoiding Bilateral Foreign Conflict ............... 59 R 2. Interpreting Acts of Congress .................... 62 R 3. The Ascendency of the Allocation of Powers Approach ........................................ 64 R IV. A STRUCTURAL FEDERAL COMMON LAW OF NATIONS ........ 76 R A. Pre-Erie Enforcement of the Law of Nations .......... 76 R B. Erie and the Rise of Legal Positivism.................. 80 R C. Sabbatino and the Allocation of Powers Approach ..... 84 R D. Implications and Potential Objections ................ 90 R CONCLUSION .................................................... 93 R INTRODUCTION There is an ongoing debate among courts and scholars regarding the proper role of customary international law in American courts.1 Two 1. Customary international law generally refers to law that “results from a general and consistent practice of states followed by them from a sense of legal obligation.” Restatement (Third) of the Foreign Relations Law of the United States § 102(2) (1987). Today, “customary international law” is generally used in lieu of the customary “law of nations.” See, e.g., Hartford Fire Ins. Co. v. California, 509 U.S. 764, 815 (1993) (Scalia, J., dissenting) (equating “customary international law” with “the law of nations”). In this Article, we generally use the phrase, “the law of nations” to refer to the customary law of nations as opposed to treaties. \\server05\productn\C\COL\109-1\COL101.txt unknown Seq: 3 22-DEC-08 11:13 2009] THE FEDERAL COMMON LAW OF NATIONS 3 diametrically opposed approaches
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Vrtss. Sign to Say Anything with Reference Blond 4 Amountingendorsed to 4D0,21.,000., Nor Gover- Mury the Reasons For' Companita
    . .. .. -.., ." - . '. .. ' , ... .' THE N011.E.4304. "'b. 1 *. ..' THE WAX& PilEfillS. , . -'' Vl - , , , -2 . • (-ivNT)Prs ritt.). ‘ -. .. f. 1.411111) DAILY mx c nr N. lir / .-' (rumaksina) wr.miLy.) 1( ronNur. .. _ ...„,,„... - B JOHN W. 1,...........:r; .:.'r:,":/ ~- ' ' .** Tula WAR i.noos will bo gent to ....' 7 oubeortbireihr -.. : . FOURTII 1......."'....'\ ,; -- . Wk NO. 111 SOUTH t3TREIST. .. .. ..., --7 ,)- OFFICE .-. , e. " . 4., tnoll(per annum In advance, - ~ , . , . - ',Z ” %.-- 1 at $24 q 1. 1.-..2 71r .. .' ,_- - I. 1, 0 7... .7 0 li:01111....., ''....:-..../.. 10 1100 _.:... 4°l' TILE DAILY PRESS, CCONCPt ~ „.,,„....,.,.:;,...,;.;...,...,!, Tt'n Subscribers, DOLLARS 1 , copll. ". 00 City Is EIGHT PER A.E- .. • . - .% •;". Mill ---- .-- .-- . -"." '' -.''' FIFTEEN . 1 - -, ... .•'-^ AK -is !, -' ::#1 or CENTS PER - , ) WEEK, -----,7, -. Carper In -- a"- 2 14 advance; 4.._''' 1" Ai ' -. _______ charged -41.0., ..---' ' t. ' . , ' claim ---• ---'-';' 7/St . - ~,,,,#'• '', tltikn Ten willbe at the mune 4.4 '1 1 1 ,'C;, ' ' ---- " O' '-:- ',-, '. • • Malted GO out 1- , , ,Th :: '-,,1 t `-, Ift .:11111 rat t, par cop?. the \4.4--,.^:^--,--, - ^ , „,,_, . :caplet° Carrier. Subscribers .k '''',HW:- . 1; 7' 1, -. , , . 4 tz.oo yoado.l'll,1.11 .1. ~ .----,-.....,, ........ o •":‘.\4`4 * r'A.T.,,, ---- ,,,„ Ric city, SEVEN DOLLARS PER ANNUM; Tunes . V 1 , • - 14,0,-;.- .1 .1 • -,o°l'l- .4 - The money accompany , always the °miss, mut . AND CENTS . mute )01,1,ass FIFTY FOR IRE MONTHS; .. 4,' 5.... 7 ....„,... N,..1 .4...,......._ . - -" ..,,...--- a.m.!: to no instance can theßa term* be &Waded /Mat, Elb AND Irt ;NE DOLIAU SEVENTY-FIVE CENTS FOR , • thq, Very yearn MONTHS, invariably Inadvance for the time • efort it Chile merethan the cost tlfPerm% .
    [Show full text]
  • Dr. Mudd and the Lincoln Assassination: the Ac Se Reopened John Paul Jones University of Richmond, [email protected]
    University of Richmond UR Scholarship Repository Law Faculty Publications School of Law 1995 Dr. Mudd and the Lincoln Assassination: The aC se Reopened John Paul Jones University of Richmond, [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: http://scholarship.richmond.edu/law-faculty-publications Part of the Military, War, and Peace Commons Recommended Citation Dr. Mudd and the Lincoln Assassination: The Case Reopened (John Paul Jones ed., 1995) This Book is brought to you for free and open access by the School of Law at UR Scholarship Repository. It has been accepted for inclusion in Law Faculty Publications by an authorized administrator of UR Scholarship Repository. For more information, please contact [email protected]. Dr. udd and the Lincoln Assassination 'rH 14: CASE REOPENED The proceedings of a Moot Court of Military Appeal to hear the case of Dr. Samuel A. Mudd with contributions by F. LEE BAILEY, JOHN JAY DOUGLASS, CANDIDA EWING STEEL, JOHN S. JENKINS and others Edited by JOHN PAUL JONES $24.95 Dr. Mudd and the Lincoln Assassination THE CASE REOPENED Edited by JOHN PAUL JONES On June 30, 1865, Samuel A. Mudd was convicted of conspiring with John Wilkes Booth and others ro assassinate President Abraham Lincoln. He was sentenced ro life imprisonment on an island off the coast of Florida. Dr. Mudd was pardoned in 1869 by President Andrew Johnson, based on his assistance in a yellow fever epidemic rather than on the merits. of his case, leaving unre­ solved until the present day the question of his ultimate guilt or innocence. On February 12, 1993, the University of Richmond School of Law convened a distin­ guished group of jurists and Civil War histori­ ans to thoroughly present both sides of the case of Samuel Mudd and the broader Lincoln Conspiracy before a panel of judges in an actual courtroom.
    [Show full text]
  • Naval Documents of the American Revolution, Volume 6, Part 8
    Naval Documents of The American Revolution Volume 6 AMERICAN THEATRE: Aug. 1, 1776–Oct. 31, 1776 EUROPEAN THEATRE: May 26, 1776–Oct. 5, 1776 Part 8 of 8 United States Government Printing Office Washington, 1972 Electronically published by American Naval Records Society Bolton Landing, New York 2012 AS A WORK OF THE UNITED STATES FEDERAL GOVERNMENT THIS PUBLICATION IS IN THE PUBLIC DOMAIN. 1428 AMERICAN THEATRE River with a load of Ammunition bound it is imagined up the Ohio but the supposed Leader remains at New Orleans. I hourly expect a Vessel from thence with some People belonging to this Province and if the Report be true and the Spanish Governor has given them any Countenance I shall en- deavor to gain the fullest information in my power relating thereto and shall forward the same to your Lordship by the first opportunity. I have already mentioned to your Lordship that I think it my duty in this critical state of Affairs to communicate every Account relating to the proceedings of the Rebels that has the least Colour of truth, and I fre- quently lament that it is not in my power to forward more full and authen- tic Information; however whether this Account be true or not there is great Reason to apprehend if the Rebellion should continue another year that the River Mississippi will be the Channel through which the Rebels will receive very considerable supplies of Ammunition, unless We obtain strict Orders from the Court of Spain to prevent their Subjects from furnishing these Supplies and also keep a sufficient Military force upon the Mississippi to search all Boats whatever carrying Ammunition up the River.
    [Show full text]
  • A Bibliography of Pennsylvania's Religious
    A BIBLIOGRAPHY OF PENNSYLVANIA’S RELIGIOUS HISTORY Compiled by Charles D. Cashdollar, Indiana University of Pennsylvania John B. Frantz, The Pennsylvania State University Karen Guenther, Mansfield University of Pennsylvania Prepared for the Pennsylvania Historical Association December 2015 i TABLE OF CONTENTS General and Non-Classified 1 Amish 13 Assembly of God 15 Baptists 15 Brethren in Christ (River Brethren) 18 Church of the Brethren 19 Church of God 21 Church of the New Jerusalem 21 Deism 22 Disciples of Christ 22 Eastern Orthodox/Eastern Catholic 24 Episcopalians 25 Evangelical and Reformed 32 Evangelical Association 32 Evangelical Congregational 33 Evangelical United Brethren 33 Father Divine 33 German Reformed 33 Harmony Society. Rappists 36 Islam 37 Jehovah’s Witnesses 37 Jews 38 Latter-Day Saints (Mormons) 42 Lutherans 43 Mennonites 46 Methodists 48 Moravians 52 Native Americans and Religion 56 New Born 58 Non-Western 58 Polish National Catholic Church 59 Presbyterians 59 Roman Catholics 67 Salvation Army 77 Schwenkfelders 78 Separatists, Unaffiliated 79 Seventh-Day German Baptist Brethren 79 Shakers 81 Society of Friends 81 Society of Women in the Wilderness 88 Unitarians and Universalists 89 United Brethren in Christ 91 United Church of Christ 91 Religion and Education 92 Historic Properties and Museums 99 ii GENERAL and NON-CLASSIFIED Ahlstrom, Sydney E. A Religious History of the American People. New Haven: Yale University Press, 1972. Balmer, Randall. Mine Eyes Have Seen the Glory: A Journey into the Evangelical Subculture in America. New York: Oxford University Press, 1989. Balmer, Randall, and Lauren F. Winner. Protestantism in America. New York: Columbia University Press, 2002.
    [Show full text]
  • In Defense of Thomas Digges
    THE Pennsylvania Magazine OF HISTORY AND BIOGRAPHY In Defense of Thomas Digges ISTORY has dealt harshly with Thomas Digges. That Mary- land gentleman, who sojourned in England during the H American Revolution, has been branded as an embezzler, a rogue, and a British spy. None of these charges was ever proved conclusively. Nineteenth-century scholars, studying the then avail- able correspondence of Benjamin Franklin and John Adams, formed their own opinions, however, and jotted them down. Franklin had accused the Marylander of pocketing for his own use most of the money sent him in 1780-1781 for support of American seamen in British prisons. The specific allegation was that Digges had drawn upon the American minister plenipotentiary in France for £495 sterling, but had applied only £30 of it to the relief of the prisoners.1 Hence, Franklin's letters had bristled with bitter invec- tives, such as ". he is the greatest villain I ever met with"2; "As to Digges, I have no confidence in him, nor in anything he says, or may say . ."3; "Beware of him, for he is very artful, and has cheated many."4 1 Franklin to John Jay, Aug. 20, 1781, auto draft, Franklin Papers, 864, Library of Con- gress, hereafter cited as Franklin, LC. Letter is printed in Francis Wharton, ed., The Revolu- tionary Diplomatic Correspondence of the United States (Washington, 1889), IV, 643-647. 2 Franklin to Gustavus Conyngham, Feb. 6, 1782, ibid., V, 149. 3 Franklin to David Hartley, Apr. 5, 1782, Jared Sparks, ed., Diplomatic Correspondence of the American Revolution (Boston, 1829-1830), II, 240; Wharton, V, 293-294.
    [Show full text]
  • Science, Ethics, and Religion in Nineteenth-Century American Literature
    THE ANATOMY OF CONSCIENCE: SCIENCE, ETHICS, AND RELIGION IN NINETEENTH-CENTURY AMERICAN LITERATURE B. Josh Doty A dissertation submitted to the faculty at the University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy in the Department of English and Comparative Literature. Chapel Hill 2016 Approved by: Jane F. Thrailkill Timothy Marr John McGowan Eliza Richards Matthew Taylor © 2016 B. Josh Doty ALL RIGHTS RESERVED ii ABSTRACT B. Josh Doty: The Anatomy of Conscience: Science, Ethics, and Religion in Nineteenth-Century American Literature (Under the direction of Jane F. Thrailkill) “The Anatomy of Conscience” examines how nineteenth-century American fiction figures a trajectory between Revolutionary physician Benjamin Rush’s speculations about a citizenry physiologically optimized for virtuous self-governance to physician and novelist Oliver Wendell Holmes, Sr.’s postbellum vision of a reformed ethics and theology informed by the biological theory of heredity. It argues that a rarely-linked group of novelists—Hannah Foster, Charles Brockden Brown, Robert Montgomery Bird, Herman Melville, and Holmes—use fiction to imagine into being new ethical and theological worlds inspired by emerging biological ideas. During the roughly hundred years separating Rush and Holmes, writers represented how new biological ideas transformed humans from blank slates capable of stunning moral change to beings burdened by the moral weight of not only their own bodies but those of their ancestors, preserved through the biological mechanism of heredity. Tracing writers’ fictionalization of the biological developments that took place between Rush and Holmes reveals the ways that literature intervened in myriad debates about emerging modes of understanding vice, virtue, and sin.
    [Show full text]
  • Table of Contents
    The Proceedings of the Cambridge Historical Society, Volume 36, 1955-1956 TABLE OF CONTENTS OFFICERS..........................................................................................................5 ​ PAPERS THE STORY OF THE EPISCOPAL THEOLOGICAL SCHOOL.....................................7 ​ BY CHARLES L. TAYLOR THE CURTAIN-RAISER TO THE FOUNDING OF RADCLIFF COLLEGE......................23 BY MARY HUME MAGUIRE THE Y.W.C.A. IN CAMBRIDGE...........................................................................41 BY FRANCES COOPER-MARSHAL DONOVAN THE HARVARD DIVINITY SCHOOL....................................................................53 BY HENRY WILDER FOOTE FIRE IN CAMBRIDGE.......................................................................................75 BY SOUTHWORTH LANCASTER SOME ASPECTS OF THE EAST CAMBRIDGE STORY............................................93 BY JOHN W. WOOD THE FOUNDER AND THREE EDITORS OF THE CAMBRIDGE CHRONICLE................107 BY ELIOT B. SPALDING ANNUAL REPORTS...............................................................................................123 ​ MEMBERS............................................................................................................133 ​ BY-LAWS.............................................................................................................137 ​ IN GRATEFUL RECOGNITION OF THE SERVICES TO THIS SOCIETY OF Robert Walcott OCTOBER 17, 1874 - NOVEMBER 11, 1956 VICE-PRESIDENT 1925-1927 PRESIDENT 1928-1954 HONORARY PRESIDENT 1955-1956 4 THE
    [Show full text]
  • New York University Law Review
    \\jciprod01\productn\N\NYU\86-1\NYU101.txt unknown Seq: 1 29-MAR-11 17:36 NEW YORK UNIVERSITY LAW REVIEW VOLUME 86 APRIL 2011 NUMBER 1 ARTICLES CHANGING THE PEOPLE: LEGAL REGULATION AND AMERICAN DEMOCRACY TABATHA ABU EL-HAJ* The world in which we live, a world in which law pervades the practice of demo- cratic politics—from advance regulation of public assemblies to detailed rules gov- erning elections—is the product of a particular period of American history. Between 1880 and 1930, states and municipalities increased governmental controls over the full range of nineteenth-century avenues for democratic participation. Prior to this legal transformation, the practice of democratic politics in the United States was less structured by law and more autonomous from formal state institu- tions than it is today. Exposing this history challenges two core assumptions that drive the work of con- temporary scholars who write about the law of the American political process. First, a study of the nineteenth-century mode of regulating politics belies the existing literature’s assumption that law must extensively structure democratic politics. Second, this account of democracy in nineteenth-century America serves as a reminder that elections, political parties, and voting, while critical to democracy, are not the whole deal. It thereby challenges law of democracy scholars to move beyond the existing literature’s narrow conception of democracy as elections and to consider more broadly the practice of democracy in America. * Copyright 2011 by Tabatha Abu El-Haj, Assistant Professor of Law, Drexel University, Earle Mack School of Law. J.D./Ph.D., New York University.
    [Show full text]
  • Rare Book and Special Collections Bibliography Beatrice S
    Digital Commons at St. Mary's University Rare Books and Special Collections Sarita Kenedy East Law Library Collections 1988 Rare Book and Special Collections Bibliography Beatrice S. Citron Follow this and additional works at: http://commons.stmarytx.edu/special Part of the Legal History Commons Recommended Citation Beatrice S. Citron, Rare Book and Special Collections Bibliography, c. 1988. This Book is brought to you for free and open access by the Sarita Kenedy East Law Library Collections at Digital Commons at St. Mary's University. It has been accepted for inclusion in Rare Books and Special Collections by an authorized administrator of Digital Commons at St. Mary's University. For more information, please contact [email protected]. RARE BOOK AND SPECIAL COLLECTIONS BIBLIOGRAPHY RARE BOOK AND SPECIAL COLLECTIONS BIBLIOGRAPHY PREFACE It is with great pride and pleasure that I present, on behalf of the Sarita Kenedy East Law Library, this first edition of the Rare Book and Special Collections Bibliography. This publication was authored by Beatrice Citron, Rare Book Librarian, and contains a detailed listing and description of the Library's rar~ books. This Bibliography represents a milestone in the development of the Library's rare and special collections since it provides an extraordinarily useful access tool for those collections. It also. coincides with the renovation of the Library's Rare Book Room which was not completed at the time the Sarita Kenedy East Law Library was constructed in 1984 with funds donated by the John G. and Marie Stella Kenedy Memorial Foundation. This room will provide the optimal environment for the scholarly research of the Library's rare legal materials.
    [Show full text]
  • Guide, George Wharton Pepper Papers (UPT 50 P423)
    A Guide to the George Wharton Pepper Papers 1797-1956 (bulk 1889-1956) 39.0 Cubic feet UPT 50 P423 Prepared by Deborah Singer and Desiree Price July 2006, June 2009 The University Archives and Records Center 3401 Market Street, Suite 210 Philadelphia, PA 19104-3358 215.898.7024 Fax: 215.573.2036 www.archives.upenn.edu Mark Frazier Lloyd, Director George Wharton Pepper Papers UPT 50 P423 TABLE OF CONTENTS PROVENANCE...............................................................................................................................1 ARRANGEMENT...........................................................................................................................1 BIOGRAPHICAL NOTE................................................................................................................2 SCOPE AND CONTENT...............................................................................................................6 CONTROLLED ACCESS HEADINGS.......................................................................................11 INVENTORY................................................................................................................................ 13 BIOGRAPHICAL MANUSCRIPTS...................................................................................... 13 CORRESPONDENCE.............................................................................................................18 SPEECHES..............................................................................................................................25
    [Show full text]
  • Hemp and Culture in the Atlantic World, 1600-1900
    CORD OF EMPIRE, EXOTIC INTOXICANT: HEMP AND CULTURE IN THE ATLANTIC WORLD, 1600-1900 by BRADLEY J. BOROUGERDI Presented to the Faculty of the Graduate School of The University of Texas at Arlington in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree of DOCTOR OF PHILOSOPHY THE UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS AT ARLINGTON May 2014 Copyright © by Bradley J. Borougerdi 2014 All Rights Reserved ii For Aiden and Meadow, whose lives are my inspiration. iii Acknowledgements This project could not have been completed without the generous help and excellent guidance of a number of people. Thomas Adam was instrumental in helping me formulate the framework of the topic in its early stages. Dennis Reinhartz has been working with me since I became an academic, and he graciously agreed to continue doings so as Professor Emeritus, for which I am ever so grateful. Christopher Morris stepped in at a time when I thought all was lost and has been more than I could have ever asked for as an advisor. I am also thankful to Imre Demhardt and Alusine Jalloh for agreeing to serve on my committee. I could not have asked for a better team of scholars to work with. James Klotter, Richard Francavilia, Beatriz Acevedo, Claire Gherini, Al Howard, and Cyrus Ala’i were all kind enough to hold conversations with me over email throughout the course of my research and provided excellent direction. Also, Isaac Campos spent time one Sunday to speak with me over the phone and provided outstanding insight. Alfred Crosby and Frances Karttunen shocked me with their generosity when they mailed me a box of microfilm to use for my research.
    [Show full text]
  • Grand Jury Under Attack, The--Part I Richard D
    Journal of Criminal Law and Criminology Volume 46 | Issue 1 Article 4 1955 Grand Jury Under Attack, The--Part I Richard D. Younger Follow this and additional works at: http://scholarlycommons.law.northwestern.edu/jclc Part of the Criminal Law Commons, Criminology Commons, and the Criminology and Criminal Justice Commons Recommended Citation Richard D. Younger, Grand Jury Under Attack, The--Part I, 46 J. Crim. L. Criminology & Police Sci. 26 (1955-1956) This Article is brought to you for free and open access by Northwestern University School of Law Scholarly Commons. It has been accepted for inclusion in Journal of Criminal Law and Criminology by an authorized administrator of Northwestern University School of Law Scholarly Commons. THE GRAND JURY UNDER ATTACK f3 Part One RICHARD D. YOUNGER The author is Assistant Professor of History in the University of Houston, Texas. He was formerly Instructor in the Milwaukee Extension Division of the University of Wis- consin. His interest in the Grand Jury began when he was a student in law in the Uni- versity. What intrigued him particularly was the question why about one half of our states have abandoned it. The article following is an abbreviation of Dr. Younger's doctor's thesis entitled A History of the Grand Jury in the United States which he pre- sented to the University of Wisconsin in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy. Part three under this title, the final portion of Professor Younger's contribution, will be published in our next number.-EDITOR a. As Justice James Wilson took his place at the front of the hall of the Philadelphia Academy, he was clearly pleased to see that so many cabinet officers, members of Congress, and leaders of Philadelphia society had braved the winter weather to attend his weekly law lecture.
    [Show full text]