DOCSLIB.ORG

Waterfowl Species Assessment (PDF)

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Waterfowl Species Assessment (PDF) WATERFOWL ASSESSMENT January 19, 2005 FINAL Andrew Weik Maine Department of Inland Fisheries and Wildlife Wildlife Division Wildlife Resource Assessment Section 650 State Street Bangor, Maine 04401 WATERFOWL ASSESSMENT TABLE OF CONTENTS Page INTRODUCTION........................................................................................................... 10 NATURAL HISTORY..................................................................................................... 12 Taxonomy........................................................................................................... 12 Life History.......................................................................................................... 12 Breeding Ecology ............................................................................................... 13 Wintering and Migration...................................................................................... 16 MANAGEMENT ............................................................................................................ 18 Regulatory Authority ........................................................................................... 18 Past Goals and Objectives ................................................................................. 18 Past and Current Management........................................................................... 22 Harvest Management ......................................................................................... 25 • Unretrieved Kill or Crippling Loss............................................................. 25 • Harvest Potential ..................................................................................... 28 • Species and Sex-specific Regulations..................................................... 29 • Hunting Vulnerability and Migration Chronology ...................................... 31 • Hunting Zones and Season Splits............................................................ 32 • Harvest Regulations and Season Frameworks........................................ 33 • Adaptive Harvest Management................................................................ 34 • Extended Framework Dates .................................................................... 35 • Recent Technological Changes in Hunting.............................................. 36 • Banding.................................................................................................... 37 HABITAT ASSESSMENT.............................................................................................. 38 Past Habitat........................................................................................................ 38 Current Habitat ................................................................................................... 41 • Breeding and Migrating Habitat ............................................................... 42 • Migrating and Wintering Habitat............................................................... 43 Habitat Projection ............................................................................................... 43 POPULATION ASSESSMENT...................................................................................... 45 Past Population .................................................................................................. 45 Current Population.............................................................................................. 46 • USFWS Waterfowl Breeding Population Survey...................................... 46 • BDJV Helicopter Plot Survey ................................................................... 47 • Waterfowl Breeding and Habitat Survey .................................................. 47 • Breeding Bird Survey............................................................................... 48 • MDIFW Brood Counts.............................................................................. 48 • Midwinter Waterfowl Survey .................................................................... 48 • Sea Duck Survey ..................................................................................... 49 2 WATERFOWL ASSESSMENT Population Projection.......................................................................................... 49 Limiting Factors .................................................................................................. 49 • Avian and Mammalian Predators............................................................. 50 • Disease.................................................................................................... 59 • Human Disturbance ................................................................................. 50 • Habitat Quantity and Quality .................................................................... 50 • Weather ................................................................................................... 52 • Nest Sites ................................................................................................ 52 • Hunting .................................................................................................... 52 • Lead Poisoning ........................................................................................ 53 USE AND DEMAND ASSESSMENT ............................................................................ 56 Trends in Hunting Seasons, Hunter Numbers, and Hunting Activity................... 56 • Harvest Information Program................................................................... 58 • Youth Waterfowl Day ............................................................................... 58 • Demographic and Economic Analysis of Waterfowl Hunting ................... 59 • Demographic and Economic Analysis of Birding ..................................... 60 Use and Demand Projections............................................................................. 62 SPECIES PROFILES.................................................................................................... 63 SUMMARY AND CONCLUSIONS .............................................................................. 118 LITERATURE CITED .................................................................................................. 125 3 WATERFOWL ASSESSMENT LIST OF TABLES Table 1. Phylogenetic groupings, common names, and scientific names of waterfowl that occur in Maine................................................. 138 Table 2. Seasonal abundance and distribution of waterfowl in Maine ................. 139 Table 3. Maine breeding waterfowl nest site preference...................................... 140 Table 4. Waterfowl hunter statistics for Maine and the Atlantic Flyway, 1961-2001.............................................................................................. 141 Table 5. Number and area of high and moderate value Waterfowl and Wadingbird Habitat (WWH) by Wildlife Management District (WMD) in Maine, 2004........................................................................... 143 Table 6. Black duck breeding and migrating habitat area estimations by Wildlife Management District (WMD) in Maine, 2004........................ 144 Table 7. Wood duck breeding habitat area estimations by Wildlife Management District (WMD) in Maine, 2004 ......................................... 145 Table 8. Scaup migration and wintering habitat area estimations by Wildlife Management District (WMD) in Maine, 2004............................. 146 Table 9. Scoter wintering habitat area estimations by Wildlife Management District (WMD) in Maine, 2004 ......................................... 147 Table 10. Dabbling duck breeding population indices for Maine and the Canadian Maritime Provinces (U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service breeding survey strata 62-67), 1996-2003............................................. 148 Table 11. Diving duck breeding population indices for Maine and the Canadian Maritime Provinces (U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service breeding survey strata 62-67), 1996-2003............................................. 149 Table 12. Canada goose breeding population indices for Maine and the Canadian Maritime Provinces (U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service breeding survey strata 62-67), 1996-2003 ................................ 149 Table 13. Breeding population estimates (total indicated pairs/503,800 km2) from the Black Duck Joint Venture Helicopter Survey in Québec, 1990-2003 ............................................................................... 150 4 WATERFOWL ASSESSMENT Table 14. Breeding population estimates of Atlantic population of Canada Goose (number of indicated pairs / 350,000 km2; Strata 3 and 4) and North Atlantic population of Canada Goose (number of indicated pairs / 105 3000 km2; Stratum 2) from the Black Duck Joint Venture survey in Québec, 1990- 2003....................................................................................................... 151 Table 15. Breeding population estimates and standard errors (in thousands) for the 10 most abundant species of ducks in the eastern survey area (Eastern Ontario, Québec, Newfoundland, Labrador, the Maritimes, and Maine), 1990- 2003....................................................................................................... 151 Table 16. Mean number of broods and proportion of total, by species, during brood counts on 39 waterfowl production index areas in Maine during 1966-76, 1980-84, 1986-90, 1991-95, 1996- 2000, 2002............................................................................................
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Special Report 10-02 Compendium of Long-Term Wildlife Monitoring
    ncasi NATIONAL COUNCIL FOR AIR AND STREAM IMPROVEMENT COMPENDIUM OF LONG-TERM WILDLIFE MONITORING PROGRAMS IN CANADA SPECIAL REPORT NO. 10-02 OCTOBER 2010 by Sonya Lévesque Saguenay, Quebec Introduction by Darren Sleep, Ph.D. NCASI Montreal, Quebec Acknowledgments The author acknowledges the assistance of the various program managers across Canada, who were kind enough to take some of their time to answer questions and to review, comment upon, and edit project descriptions. A special thanks to Denis Lepage, from Bird Studies Canada, for his collaboration and interest. The author also thanks Darren Sleep and Kirsten Vice, from the National Council for Air and Stream Improvement, for their trust and help. For more information about this research, contact: Darren J.H. Sleep, Ph.D. Kirsten Vice Senior Forest Ecologist Vice President, Canadian Operations NCASI NCASI P.O. Box 1036, Station B P.O. Box 1036, Station B Montreal, QC H3B 3K5 Canada Montreal, QC H3B 3K5 Canada (514) 286-9690 (514) 286-9111 [email protected] [email protected] For information about NCASI publications, contact: Publications Coordinator NCASI P.O. Box 13318 Research Triangle Park, NC 27709-3318 (919) 941-6400 [email protected] Cite this report as: National Council for Air and Stream Improvement, Inc. (NCASI). 2010. Compendium of long-term wildlife monitoring programs in Canada. Special Report No. 10-02. Research Triangle Park, N.C.: National Council for Air and Stream Improvement, Inc. © 2010 by the National Council for Air and Stream Improvement, Inc. ncasi serving the environmental research needs of the forest products industry since 1943 PRESIDENT’S NOTE Wildlife monitoring can be a reliable source of information that contributes to effective forest management.
    [Show full text]
  • Atlantic Flyway Shorebird Initiative
    2021 GRANT SLATE Atlantic Flyway Shorebird Initiative NFWF CONTACTS Bridget Collins Senior Manager, Private Lands and Bird Conservation, [email protected] 202-297-6759 Scott Hall Senior Scientist, Bird Conservation [email protected] 202-595-2422 PARTNERS Red knots ABOUT NFWF Chartered by Congress in 1984, OVERVIEW the National Fish and Wildlife The National Fish and Wildlife Foundation (NFWF), the US Fish and Wildlife Service and Foundation (NFWF) protects and Southern Company announce a fourth year of funding for the Atlantic Flyway Shorebird restores the nation’s fish, wildlife, program. Six new or continuing shorebird conservation grants totaling nearly $625,000 plants and habitats. Working with were awarded. These six awards generated $656,665 in match from grantees, for a total federal, corporate and individual conservation impact of $1.28 million. Overall, this slate of projects will improve habitat partners, NFWF has funded more management on more than 50,000 acres, conduct outreach to more than 100,000 people, than 5,000 organizations and and will complete a groundbreaking, science-based toolkit to help managers successfully generated a total conservation reduce human disturbance of shorebirds year-round. impact of $6.1 billion. The Atlantic Flyway Shorebirds program aims to increase populations for three focal Learn more at www.nfwf.org species by improving habitat functionality and condition at critical sites, supporting the species’ full annual lifecycles. The Atlantic Flyway Shorebird business plan outlines NATIONAL HEADQUARTERS strategies to address key stressors for the American oystercatcher, red knot and whimbrel. 1133 15th Street, NW Suite 1000 approaches to address habitat loss, predation, and human disturbance.
    [Show full text]
  • Ecoregions of New England Forested Land Cover, Nutrient-Poor Frigid and Cryic Soils (Mostly Spodosols), and Numerous High-Gradient Streams and Glacial Lakes
    58. Northeastern Highlands The Northeastern Highlands ecoregion covers most of the northern and mountainous parts of New England as well as the Adirondacks in New York. It is a relatively sparsely populated region compared to adjacent regions, and is characterized by hills and mountains, a mostly Ecoregions of New England forested land cover, nutrient-poor frigid and cryic soils (mostly Spodosols), and numerous high-gradient streams and glacial lakes. Forest vegetation is somewhat transitional between the boreal regions to the north in Canada and the broadleaf deciduous forests to the south. Typical forest types include northern hardwoods (maple-beech-birch), northern hardwoods/spruce, and northeastern spruce-fir forests. Recreation, tourism, and forestry are primary land uses. Farm-to-forest conversion began in the 19th century and continues today. In spite of this trend, Ecoregions denote areas of general similarity in ecosystems and in the type, quality, and 5 level III ecoregions and 40 level IV ecoregions in the New England states and many Commission for Environmental Cooperation Working Group, 1997, Ecological regions of North America – toward a common perspective: Montreal, Commission for Environmental Cooperation, 71 p. alluvial valleys, glacial lake basins, and areas of limestone-derived soils are still farmed for dairy products, forage crops, apples, and potatoes. In addition to the timber industry, recreational homes and associated lodging and services sustain the forested regions economically, but quantity of environmental resources; they are designed to serve as a spatial framework for continue into ecologically similar parts of adjacent states or provinces. they also create development pressure that threatens to change the pastoral character of the region.
    [Show full text]
  • Copyrighted Material
    INDEX See also Accommodations and Restaurant indexes, below. GENERAL INDEX best, 9–10 AITO (Association of Blue Hill, 186–187 Independent Tour Brunswick and Bath, Operators), 48 AA (American Automobile A 138–139 Allagash River, 271 Association), 282 Camden, 166–170 Allagash Wilderness AARP, 46 Castine, 179–180 Waterway, 271 Abacus Gallery (Portland), 121 Deer Isle, 181–183 Allen & Walker Antiques Abbe Museum (Acadia Downeast coast, 249–255 (Portland), 122 National Park), 200 Freeport, 132–134 Alternative Market (Bar Abbe Museum (Bar Harbor), Grand Manan Island, Harbor), 220 217–218 280–281 Amaryllis Clothing Co. Acadia Bike & Canoe (Bar green-friendly, 49 (Portland), 122 Harbor), 202 Harpswell Peninsula, Amato’s (Portland), 111 Acadia Drive (St. Andrews), 141–142 American Airlines 275 The Kennebunks, 98–102 Vacations, 50 Acadia Mountain, 203 Kittery and the Yorks, American Automobile Asso- Acadia Mountain Guides, 203 81–82 ciation (AAA), 282 Acadia National Park, 5, 6, Monhegan Island, 153 American Express, 282 192, 194–216 Mount Desert Island, emergency number, 285 avoiding crowds in, 197 230–231 traveler’s checks, 43 biking, 192, 201–202 New Brunswick, 255 American Lighthouse carriage roads, 195 New Harbor, 150–151 Foundation, 25 driving tour, 199–201 Ogunquit, 87–91 American Revolution, 15–16 entry points and fees, 197 Portland, 107–110 America the Beautiful Access getting around, 196–197 Portsmouth (New Hamp- Pass, 45–46 guided tours, 197 shire), 261–263 America the Beautiful Senior hiking, 202–203 Rockland, 159–160 Pass, 46–47 nature
    [Show full text]
  • Natural Landscapes of Maine a Guide to Natural Communities and Ecosystems
    Natural Landscapes of Maine A Guide to Natural Communities and Ecosystems by Susan Gawler and Andrew Cutko Natural Landscapes of Maine A Guide to Natural Communities and Ecosystems by Susan Gawler and Andrew Cutko Copyright © 2010 by the Maine Natural Areas Program, Maine Department of Conservation 93 State House Station, Augusta, Maine 04333-0093 All rights reserved. No part of this book may be reproduced or transmitted in any form or by any means, electronic or mechanical, including photocopying, recording, or by any information storage and retrieval system without written permission from the authors or the Maine Natural Areas Program, except for inclusion of brief quotations in a review. Illustrations and photographs are used with permission and are copyright by the contributors. Images cannot be reproduced without expressed written consent of the contributor. ISBN 0-615-34739-4 To cite this document: Gawler, S. and A. Cutko. 2010. Natural Landscapes of Maine: A Guide to Natural Communities and Ecosystems. Maine Natural Areas Program, Maine Department of Conservation, Augusta, Maine. Cover photo: Circumneutral Riverside Seep on the St. John River, Maine Printed and bound in Maine using recycled, chlorine-free paper Contents Page Acknowledgements ..................................................................................... 3 Foreword ..................................................................................................... 4 Introduction ...............................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • 2015 Canadian NAWMP Report
    September 2015 nawmp.wetlandnetwork.ca HabitatMatters 2015 Canadian NAWMP Report Mallard Pair – Early Winter Robert Bateman North American Waterfowl Management Plan —— Plan nord-américain de gestion de la sauvagine —— Plan de Manejo de Aves 2015 Canadian North American Waterfowl Management Plan Report AcuáticasHabitat MattersNorteaméricaa ContentsTable of 1 About the NAWMP 2 National Overview 2 Accomplishments 3 Expenditures and Contributions 4 Special Feature – NAWCA’s 25th Anniversary 6 Habitat Joint Ventures 7 Pacific Birds Habitat Joint Venture 12 Canadian Intermountain Joint Venture 16 Prairie Habitat Joint Venture 21 Eastern Habitat Joint Venture 26 Species Joint Ventures 27 Black Duck Joint Venture 29 Sea Duck Joint Venture 31 Arctic Goose Joint Venture 33 Partners b Habitat Matters 2015 Canadian North American Waterfowl Management Plan Report About the NAWMP Ducks congregate at a prairie pothole wetland. The North American Waterfowl Management Plan (NAWMP or ©Ducks Unlimited Canada/Brian Wolitski ‘the Plan’) is an international partnership to restore, conserve and protect waterfowl populations and associated habitats through management decisions based on strong biological partnership extends across North America, working at national foundations. The ultimate goal is to achieve abundant and and regional levels on a variety of waterfowl and habitat resilient waterfowl populations and sustainable landscapes. management issues. The Plan engages the community of users and supporters committed to conservation and valuing waterfowl. Since the creation of the Plan, NAWMP partners have worked to conserve and restore wetlands, associated uplands and In 1986, the Canadian and United States governments other key habitats for waterfowl across Canada, the United signed this international partnership agreement, laying the States and Mexico.
    [Show full text]
  • Linking Canadian Harvested Juvenile American Black Ducks to Their Natal Areas Using Stable Isotope ( D, 13C, and 15N) Methods
    Copyright © 2010 by the author(s). Published here under license by the Resilience Alliance. Ashley, P., K. A. Hobson, S. L. VanWilgenburg, N. North, and S. Allan Petrie. 2010. Linking Canadian harvested juvenile American black ducks to their natal areas using stable isotope ( d, 13c, and 15n) methods. Avian Conservation and Ecology 5(2): 7. [online] URL: http://www.ace-eco.org/vol5/iss2/art7/ Research Papers Linking Canadian Harvested Juvenile American Black Ducks to Their Natal Areas Using Stable Isotope ( D, 13C, and 15N) Methods Établissement de liens entre les Canards noirs juvéniles pris au Canada et leurs régions natales à l’aide des méthodes fondées sur les isotopes stables ( D, 13C et 15N) Paul Ashley 1 , Keith A. Hobson 2 , Steven L. Van Wilgenburg 2 , Norm North 3 , and Scott A. Petrie 1 ABSTRACT. Understanding source-sink dynamics of game birds is essential to harvest and habitat management but acquiring this information is often logistically and financially challenging using traditional methods of population surveys and banding studies. This is especially true for species such as the American Black Duck ( Anas rubripes ), which have low breeding densities and extensive breeding ranges that necessitate extensive surveys and banding programs across eastern North America. Despite this effort, the contribution of birds fledged from various landscapes and habitat types within specific breeding ranges to regional harvest is largely unknown but remains an important consideration in adaptive harvest management and targeted habitat conservation strategies. We investigated if stable isotope ( D, 13C, 15N) could augment our present understanding of connectivity between breeding and harvest areas and so provide information relevant to the two main management strategies for black ducks, harvest and habitat management.
    [Show full text]
  • Harvest Distribution and Derivation of Atlantic Flyway Canada Geese
    Articles Harvest Distribution and Derivation of Atlantic Flyway Canada Geese Jon D. Klimstra,* Paul I. Padding U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, Division of Migratory Bird Management, 11510 American Holly Drive, Laurel, Maryland 20708 Abstract Harvest management of Canada geese Branta canadensis is complicated by the fact that temperate- and subarctic- breeding geese occur in many of the same areas during fall and winter hunting seasons. These populations cannot readily be distinguished, thereby complicating efforts to estimate population-specific harvest and evaluate harvest strategies. In the Atlantic Flyway, annual banding and population monitoring programs are in place for subarctic- breeding (North Atlantic Population, Southern James Bay Population, and Atlantic Population) and temperate- breeding (Atlantic Flyway Resident Population [AFRP]) Canada geese. We used a combination of direct band recoveries and estimated population sizes to determine the distribution and derivation of the harvest of those four populations during the 2004–2005 through 2008–2009 hunting seasons. Most AFRP geese were harvested during the special September season (42%) and regular season (54%) and were primarily taken in the state or province in which they were banded. Nearly all of the special season harvest was AFRP birds: 98% during September seasons and 89% during late seasons. The regular season harvest in Atlantic Flyway states was also primarily AFRP geese (62%), followed in importance by the Atlantic Population (33%). In contrast, harvest in eastern Canada consisted mainly of subarctic geese (42% Atlantic Population, 17% North Atlantic Population, and 6% Southern James Bay Population), with temperate- breeding geese making up the rest. Spring and summer harvest was difficult to characterize because band reporting rates for subsistence hunters are poorly understood; consequently, we were unable to determine the magnitude of subsistence harvest definitively.
    [Show full text]
  • Age Ratios and Their Possible Use in Determining Autumn Routes of Passerine Migrants
    Wilson Bull., 93(2), 1981, pp. 164-188 AGE RATIOS AND THEIR POSSIBLE USE IN DETERMINING AUTUMN ROUTES OF PASSERINE MIGRANTS C.JOHN RALPH A principal interest of early students of passerine migration was the determination of direction, location and width of migratory routes. In such studies, it was presumed that an area where the species was most abun- dant was the main migration route. However, during fall, passerine mi- grants tend to be silent and inconspicuous, rendering censusing subjective at best. Species also differ in preferred habitat, affecting the results of censuses and the number captured by mist netting. In this study, I used the abundance of migrants with another possible criterion, their age ratios, in order to hypothesize possible migratory routes. Based upon information about species abundance in different areas, a lively debate sprang up in the past between a school favoring narrow routes and one advocating broad front migration. The former suggested that birds followed topographical features (“leading lines”) such as river valleys, coast lines and mountain ranges (Baird 1866, Palmen 1876, Winkenwer- der 1902, Clark 1912, Schenk 1922). The latter group proposed that a species migrated over a broad geographical area regardless of topograph- ical features (Gatke 1895; Cooke 1904, 1905; Geyr von Schweppenburg 1917, 1924; Moreau 1927). Thompson (1926) and later Lincoln (1935), sug- gested that both schools were probably right, depending upon the species involved. Early ornithologists were possibly misled because of the differ- ences between easily observable (and often narrow front), diurnal migra- tion and less obvious, but probably more common, nocturnal movements.
    [Show full text]
  • 2 Study Area
    CA PDF Page 49 of 1038 Energy East Project Part B: Deterministic Modelling of the Ecological and Volume 24: Ecological and Human Health Risk Human Health Consequences of Marine Oil Spills Assessment for Oil Spills in the Marine Environment Section 2: Study Area 2 STUDY AREA The study area for the analysis of hypothetical crude oil spills for the proposed marine terminal is described in detail in Part A, Section 2 of the EHHRA. This section provides an overview. 2.1 Overview of Canaport Energy East Marine Terminal Operations and Expanded Shipping Operations The proposed marine terminal will be located on the western shore of the Bay of Fundy, southeast of the City of Saint John and southwest of Mispec Point, New Brunswick. The marine terminal is proposed to be located adjacent to the two existing Canaport marine facilities: a single buoy mooring (SBM or mono- buoy) for offloading crude oil to the Irving Canaport facility, and the Canaport LNG terminal for import and now recently licensed for export of liquefied natural gas (Figure 1-1). The marine terminal will include pile-supported trestles and breasting/mooring dolphins for two berths that can accommodate Aframax and Suezmax tankers (Berth 2), as well as VLCC tanker types (Berth 1), with capacities of 113,300 to 348,000 m3 (710,000 to 2.2 million barrels). The two berths will be constructed simultaneously. Oil will be pumped from shore via a trestle approximately 645 m long. Berths 1 and 2 will be interconnected by a trestle approximately 380 m long. The marine terminal is expected to receive approximately 281 tanker calls per year for shipping of crude oil products originating from western Canada.
    [Show full text]
  • Maine's Recovery of Recreational Damages Due to Coastal Oil Spills Tanya Baker
    The University of Maine DigitalCommons@UMaine Energy & the Environment Margaret Chase Smith Policy Center 2005 Maine's Recovery of Recreational Damages Due to Coastal Oil Spills Tanya Baker Kevin Boyle Deirdre Mageean Neil Pettigrew Jonathan Rubin See next page for additional authors Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.library.umaine.edu/ mcspc_energy_environ This Report is brought to you for free and open access by DigitalCommons@UMaine. It has been accepted for inclusion in Energy & the Environment by an authorized administrator of DigitalCommons@UMaine. For more information, please contact [email protected]. Authors Tanya Baker, Kevin Boyle, Deirdre Mageean, Neil Pettigrew, Jonathan Rubin, and Jennifer Ward Maine’s Recovery of Recreational Damages Due to Coastal Oil Spills August, 2005 Tanya Baker Kevin Boyle Deirdre Mageean Neal Pettigrew Jonathan Rubin Jennifer L. Ward Disclaimer This report has been funded in part by the Maine Oil Spill Advisory Committee (MOSAC). The opinions and conclusions state the views of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the views of MOSAC or any other individual or organization. Acknowledgements We thank the following individuals and organizations for their assistance with the research in this project. All errors and omissions are the responsibility of the authors. Contact Agency / Organization Charlene Daniels Maine Bureau of Parks & Lands Tom DesJardin Maine Bureau of Parks & Lands Natalie Springuel Marine Extension Associate, Maine Sea Grant Amy Kersteen
    [Show full text]
  • Amount Requested Classification DEPARTMENT of AGRICULTURE, CONSERVATION and FORESTRY 566 220,000 Newry Grafton Notch State Park
    Classification Amount Requested DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE, CONSERVATION AND FORESTRY 566 Newry Grafton Notch State Park Pavement of Walkways (CON 364) B 220,000 567 Presque Isle Aroostook State Park Road Improvements (CON 365) B 221,600 584 Casco Sebago Lake State Park 5 Bay Storage Building (CON 1075) B 49,900 598 Prospect Fort Knox State Historic Site Drainage & Path Improvements. B 75,000 600 Phippsburg Fort Popham State Historic Site Roof Repairs. B 800,000 601 Dover Foxcroft/Bowerbank Peaks-Kenny State Park Day Use Area (CON 601) B 80,000 602 Lamoine Lamoine State Park Pier and Gangway Replacement. B 50,000 604 Jefferson Damariscotta Lake State Park New Playground. B 55,000 6887 Cape Elizabeth Two Lights State Park new group shelter (CON 292) B 100,000 6888 Edmunds Twp. Cobscook Bay State Park Building Renovations (CON 206) B 27,000 6926 Kittery Point Fort McClary State Historic Site foundation repair (CON 274) B 286,300 6928 Machias Fort O'Brien State Historic Park shoreline improvements (CON B 90,000 306) 6929 Lubec Quoddy Head State Park Light Keeper's House (CON 255) B 51,000 7120 Island Falls Island Falls District Headquarters Office Expansion (CON 298) B 80,500 7122 New Harbor Colonial Pemaquid State Historic Site Museum/Visitor Center B 600,000 Renovations (CON 405) 7123 Poland Range Pond State Park Restroom Renovations (CON 302) B 101,200 7127 Swanville Swan Lake State Park contact station replacement (CON 267) B 71,000 7128 Edmunds Twp. Cobscook Bay State Park ADA accessible play equipment B 55,000 (CON249) 7129 Presque
    [Show full text]