Nominalizations As a Source for Verbal Morphology. Grammaticalization Paths of Modality and Information Structure in Earlier Egyptian Elsa Oréal
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Nominalizations as a source for verbal morphology. Grammaticalization paths of modality and information structure in Earlier Egyptian Elsa Oréal To cite this version: Elsa Oréal. Nominalizations as a source for verbal morphology. Grammaticalization paths of modality and information structure in Earlier Egyptian. Lingua Aegyptia - Journal of Egyptian Language Studies, Widmaier Verlag, 2017, pp.1-33. hal-01728636 HAL Id: hal-01728636 https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/hal-01728636 Submitted on 19 Oct 2019 HAL is a multi-disciplinary open access L’archive ouverte pluridisciplinaire HAL, est archive for the deposit and dissemination of sci- destinée au dépôt et à la diffusion de documents entific research documents, whether they are pub- scientifiques de niveau recherche, publiés ou non, lished or not. The documents may come from émanant des établissements d’enseignement et de teaching and research institutions in France or recherche français ou étrangers, des laboratoires abroad, or from public or private research centers. publics ou privés. LINGUA AEGYPTIA JOURNAL OF EGYPTIAN LANGUAGE STUDIES 25 2017 Widmaier Verlag ∙ Hamburg 2018 LINGUA AEGYPTIA – Journal of Egyptian Language Studies (LingAeg) founded by Friedrich Junge, Frank Kammerzell & Antonio Loprieno EDITORS Heike Behlmer Frank Kammerzell Antonio Loprieno Gerald Moers (Göttingen) (Berlin) (Basel) (Wien) MANAGING EDITOR REVIEW EDITORs Kai Widmaier Eliese-Sophia Lincke Daniel A. Werning (Hamburg) (Berlin) (Berlin) IN COLLABORATION WITH Tilmann Kunze (Berlin) ADVISORY BOARD James P. Allen, Providence Elsa Oréal, Paris Wolfgang Schenkel, Tübingen Joris F. Borghouts, Leiden Richard B. Parkinson, Oxford Thomas Schneider, Vancouver Christopher J. Eyre, Liverpool Stéphane Polis, Liège Ariel Shisha-Halevy, Jerusalem Eitan Grossman, Jerusalem Sebastian Richter, Berlin Deborah Sweeney, Tel Aviv Roman Gundacker, Wien Kim Ryholt, Copenhagen Pascal Vernus, Paris Janet H. Johnson, Chicago Helmut Satzinger, Wien Daniel Werning, Berlin Matthias Müller, Basel Jean Winand, Liège LINGUA AEGYPTIA (recommended abbreviation: LingAeg) publishes articles and book reviews on all aspects of Egyptian and Coptic language and literature in the narrower sense: (a) grammar, in cluding graphemics, phonology, morphology, syntax, semantics, pragmatics, lexico graphy; (b) Egyptian language history, including norms, diachrony, dialectology, typology; (c) com para tive linguistics, in- cluding Afroasiatic contacts, loanwords; (d) theory and history of Egyptian literature and literary discourse; (e) history of Egyptological linguistics. We also welcome contri butions on other aspects of Egyptology and neigh- bouring disciplines, in so far as they relate to the journal’s scope. Short articles on grammar and lexicon will be published in the section “Miscella nies”. Authors of articles or reviews will receive electronic off-prints. Periodically, we would also like to put the journal at the colleagues’ disposal for a forum in which an important or neglected topic of Egyptian linguistics is treated at some length: in this case, a scholar who is active in this particular area will be invited to write a conceptual paper, and others will be asked to comment on it. Authors should submit papers electronically to the managing editor ([email protected]). Please send contributions in both doc/docx and pdf format. Further information (incl. guidelines and a template) is available from www.widmaier-verlag.de. The decision whether to publish a manu script is taken by the editors in agree- ment with the advisory board. Addresses Departement Altertumswissenschaften: Ägyptologie, Universität Basel Petersgraben 51, 4051 Basel, Switzerland Institut für Archäologie: LB Archäologie und Kulturgeschichte Nordostafrikas, Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin Unter den Linden 6, 10099 Berlin, Germany Seminar für Ägyptologie und Koptologie, Georg-August-Universität Göttingen Kulturwissenschaftliches Zentrum, Heinrich-Düker-Weg 14, 37073 Göttingen, Germany Institut für Ägyptologie, Universität Wien Franz-Klein-Gasse 1, 1190 Wien, Austria The annual subscription rates are 49 € for individual and 69 € for institutional subscribers while single issues are available for 99 € (incl. German VAT, excl. shipping). Orders should be sent to the publisher: Widmaier Verlag, Kai Widmaier, Witthof 23F, 22305 Hamburg, Germany ([email protected]). www.widmaier-verlag.de ISSN 0942-5659 | ISBN 978-3-943955-65-1 Proceedings of the Fifth International Conference on Egyptian-Coptic Linguistics (Crossroads V) Berlin, February 17–20, 2016 edited by Daniel A. Werning Widmaier Verlag ∙ Hamburg 2018 Titelaufnahme: Daniel A. Werning (ed.) Proceedings of the Fifth International Conference on Egyptian-Coptic Linguistics (Crossroads V) Berlin, February 17–20, 2016 Hamburg: Widmaier Verlag, 2018 (Lingua Aegyptia – Journal of Egyptian Language Studies; 25) ISSN 0942-5659 ISBN 978-3-943955-65-1 © Widmaier Verlag, Kai Widmaier, Hamburg 2018 Das Werk, einschließlich aller seiner Teile, ist urheberrechtlich geschützt. Jede Verwertung außerhalb der engen Grenzen des Urheberrechtsgesetzes ist ohne Zustimmung des Verlages unzulässig und strafbar. Das gilt insbesondere für Vervielfältigungen, Übersetzungen, Mikroverfilmungen und die Einspeicherung und Verarbeitung in elektronischen Systemen. Gedruckt auf säurefreiem, archivierfähigem Papier. Druck und Verarbeitung: Hubert & Co., Göttingen Printed in Germany www.widmaier-verlag.de CONTENTS PREFACE ........................................................................................................ vii–x ARTICLES Marc Brose Das ägyptische Verb und der ägyptisch-semitische Sprachvergleich ......... 1–40 Gaëlle Chantrain & Camilla Di Biase-Dyson Making a Case for Multidimensionality in Ramesside Figurative Language ..................................................................................................... 41–66 Roberto A. Díaz Hernández Von wn.|n und wn zu ⲛⲉ. Ein diachroner Fall der Hintergrundinformation............................................................................... 67–81 Barbara Egedi Two Kinds of Definiteness in Coptic .......................................................... 83–99 Roman Gundacker Where to Place ‘Ältere Komposita’? Traces of Dialectal Diversity Among Early Toponyms and Theonyms ..................................................... 101–176 Elsa Oréal Nominalizations as a Source for Verbal Morphology. Grammaticalization Paths of Modality and Information Structure in Earlier Egyptian .............. 177–209 Helmut Satzinger Second Tenses in Egyptian-Coptic and Some Other African Languages ... 211–229 Wolfgang Schenkel |n-/= „sagt“ < |(.|) |n- „sagt(e), nämlich“ .................................................. 231–279 Gebhard J. Selz, Colette Grinevald & Orly Goldwasser The Question of Sumerian “Determinatives”. Inventory, Classifier Analysis, and Comparison to Egyptian Classifiers from the Linguistic Perspective of Noun Classification ............................................................. 281–344 Nathalie Sojic Identifying Late Egyptian Virtual Relative Clauses .................................... 345–372 vi Contents Elisabeth Steinbach-Eicke Experiencing is Tasting. Perception Metaphors of Taste in Ancient Egyptian ...................................................................................................... 373–390 Sami Uljas Where to Stick an Adverbial in Earlier Egyptian ........................................ 391–414 ADDRESSES OF THE AUTHORS .............................................................. 415–416 ADVERTISEMENTS LingAeg Studia Monographica: New Publication LingAeg 25 (2017), 177–209 Nominalizations as a Source for Verbal Morphology Grammaticalization Paths of Modality and Information Structure in Earlier Egyptian Elsa Oréal1 Abstract In Earlier Egyptian, verb forms whose translation involve some sort of modality include the sDm(w)-f, often called “Prospective,” and the “Emphatic” mrr-f form. Both have been rec- ognized to have nominal features, although their syntactic and discursive function remains a much discussed topic. This contribution proposes to reconstruct paths of change that explain the emergence of these forms out of former participant/event nominalizations marked for defi- niteness vs. indefiniteness. Exploring this hypothesis sheds light not only on what is inherently marked by the forms themselves, but also on the role of particular uses within distinct source constructions in elaborating their respective semantics. 1 From nominalizations to verbs There is nothing new to the idea that Earlier Egyptian verb forms emerged from former nominalizations2. Still, some space is left for a diachronic analysis aiming at reconstructing concrete paths that may have led constructions involving nominalized forms of the verb to grammaticalize as verb forms. More specifically, as more than one Earlier Egyptian verb form appears to have had a nominalized source, an explanation of their respective TAM function and the way it relates to their (visible) morphology is needed. In this contribution, I will focus on two forms that share some syntactic positions and are also sometimes deemed to have some semantic uses in common: – the <w> form or sDm-w-f, – the geminated form or mrr-f. 1 LLACAN-CNRS, Paris (Elsa.Oreal[at]cnrs.fr). Many thanks are due to Orly Goldwasser, Eitan Grossman, Frank Kammerzell and Stéphane Polis for discussing various questions related to my research on Egyptian nominalizations in a diachronic perspective. Daniel Werning