Postconcussional Disorder and Loss of Consciousness
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Postconcussional Disorder and Loss of Consciousness Stephen D. Anderson, MD, FRCP(C) Postconcussional disorder (PCD) has been described in the psychiatric, neuro- logical, neuropsychological, and rehabilitation medicine literature for many years. PCD has recently been introduced into DSM-IV, appearing in an appendix that contains a number of proposals for new categories and axes that were suggested for possible inclusion in DSM-IV. There are some major difficulties with the proposed criteria for PCD. This article explores some of these difficulties, partic- ularly focusing on the criteria of loss of consciousness (LOC). A review of the literature demonstrates that LOC is not necessary for PCD to occur. The major difficulty with the DSM-IV criteria is the definition of concussion. The article suggests that, instead, the criteria for mild traumatic brain injury, as defined by the American Congress of Rehabilitation Medicine, may be more appropriate. Postconcussional disorder (PCD) has been symptoms include headache pain, nausea. described in the medical literature for dizziness or vertigo. unsteadiness or poor over a century. The telm Post-concussion coordination, tinnitus, hearing loss. blurred syndrome was coined by Strauss and vision, diplopia, convergence insufficiency. Savitsky in 1934.' PCD is the most preva- light and noise sensitivity, and altered sense lent and yet controversial neuropsychiat~ic of taste and smell. The cognitive deficits diagnosis following brain injury. PCD is include memory difticulties, decreased at- linked most commonly to minor brain in- tention and concentration, decreased speed jury. because the symptoms are unobscured of information processing, communication by the myriad of findings that accompany a difficulties, difficulties with executive fin- more severe brain injuly. The constellation tioning (including initiation and planning, of symptoms includes physical symptoms. judgment and perception). and an increased cognitive deficits, and emotional sequelae. sensitivity to lack of sleep. fatigue, stress. PCD is described in the neurological, neu- drugs, and alcohol. Emotional symptoms ropsychological. psychiatric. and rehabilita- include emotional lability, irritability and tion medicine literature. Common physical aggression, a change in personality. fatigue and decreased energy, anxiety, depression, Dr. Anderson is clinical assistant PI-ofessor,Univcl-sity apathy, disordered sleep, loss of libido. and of British Colunlbia Faculty of Medicine, Department of poor appetite.' Psychiatry, Vancouver, Canada. Addl-ess cot-respon- dence to: Stephen I). Anderson, MD, University ol Although the underlying pathology of BI-itish Columbia Faculty of Medicine, Department ol PCD is uncertain, a generally accepted Psychiatry, 204-2775 Heathel- St., Vancouver, BC, Can- ada V5Z 1M9. theory is that it is caused by rotational Bull Am Acad Psychiatry Law, Vol. 24, No. 4, 1996 493 Anderson sheer strains and corresponding diffuse surgery Update Series, ~lexander' in- axonal injury throughout the brain. Stud- cluded a computed tomography (CT) scan ies of primates have confirmed that ac- of a 59-yeat--old man who never lost con- celeration of the head without impact can sciousness, but developed amnesia and a cause severe diffuse destruction of brain personality change. His CT scan clearly substance. Gennarelli et al.' produced demonstrated hemorrhagic lesions in an- traumatic coma in 45 monkeys by accel- terior and inferior frontal regions. erating their heads without impact. At Patients suffering from PCD usually autopsy, the principal abnormality seen have a reduction in the overall speed, was best appreciated microscopically and efficiency, execution, and integration of consisted of diffuse axonal injury (DAI), mental processes. This has been de- which manifest as axonal retsaction balls scribed as "reduced information process- or abnosmalities of axonal morphology in ing capacity" by Gronwall.' Following the white matter of the brain. Axonal mild brain injury, patients have difficul- damage was not confined to focal areas, ties in areas that require them to analyze but rather was scattered widely through- complex information. and they therefore out the white matter of the cerebral hemi- present as slower. more distractible. and spheres. 0ppenheimer4 found damaged forgetful. When patients are concentrat- axons with neuropathological changes ing on point A. they are unable to also similar to more severe injury in five pa- process point B simultaneously. and they tients with mild traumatic brain injury therefore present as inattentive because who had died from other injuries. One of they are unable to process a normal the patients had been knocked down by a stream of information. motor scooter, had no loss of conscious- Often there are few if any findings on ness. and was described only as physical examination, and the micro- "stunned" following his accident. scopic bsain damage is usually not de- In addition to DAI, focal in.juries may tected with conventional imaging tech- occur following head injury. For exam- niques such as CT or magnetic resonance ple, contusions may appear on the under- imaging (MRI) scanning. Neuropsycho- surface of the temporal and frontal lobes logical assessment is often undertaken, and the anterior pole of the temporal but tends to err in the direction of under- lobes due to contact with rough bony estimating disorders. Many valid prob- surfaces. The orbital frontal cortex is par- lems are not registered on neuropsycho- ticitlarly sensitive to damage during ac- logical testing. Orbital-frontal deficits are celeration/deceleration injuries because difficult to detect with standard neuropsy- of its proximity to the bony structures of chological testing. Subtle changes in at- the skull. This area is sometimes irrever- tention and concentration, new learning ently referred to as the "dashboard" of the ability, word retrieval. and judgment of- brain.%any patients even with severe ten do not register in the testing. Tradi- focal contusions never lose conscious- tional IQ tests are often insensitive. Al- ness. In the 1984 Neurology LII~Neuro- though no single test is diagnostic of 494 Bull Am Acad Psychiatry Law, Vol. 24, No. 4, 1996 Postconcussional Disorder frontal lobe functioning, the tinker toy deficits may be temporary, this does not test has been shown to have some predic- mean that brain damage is reversible. tive value with regard to future employ- Brain tissue does not regenerate. The cu- ment.8 mulative effect of subsequent head injury, Most available tests of memory assess causing ongoing cognitive deficits. is an verbal memory and learning and do not example of the ongoing residual effects of involve high level processing of complex brain in.jury. As discussed by ~ronwell,' information. Patients, however-, often there may be persistent "cognitive fragil- complain of difficulties with episodic ity" to central nervous system (CNS) memory (for day to day activities) or with stressors. Ewing rt al.'" compared perfor- procedural memory (the learning and re- mance under conditions of mild hypoxia call process). It is important, therefore, to in a group of imiversity students who had carefully interview patients and obtain made a "full recovery" from mild head collateral information from family, injury between one and three years before fsiends. and employers. Psychiatric and the study was done with a matched group neuropsychological assessments are per- of control students who had never had a formed in quiet, controlled environments head injury. The mild head injury group that do not include the distractions and perfommd, when mildly hypoxic. at a sig- frustrations of everyday living. and these- nificantly lower level than control sib fore difficulties may be undesestimated. jects on a memory and vigilance task. Testing of a patient within a few Although the students who had suffered months of the injury with repeated tcsting previously fsom mild head injury had re- a year 01- more later may provide more turned to their previous level of function- useful information then an examination ing and had engaged in full-time univer- given at only one point in time. Testing sity work, the mild head injury may have that revealx improvement oves time helps left a residual effect that impaired their confirm that the disorder began at the ability to withstand another CNS stressor. time of the brain il~.jur~." Psychological factors may also intlu- Fortunately. the majority of studies ence late symptoms. This often occurs suggest that although PCD is seen in the when primary deficits are undiagnosed, majority of patients within the first month resulting in a dysfunctional cycle. Pa- following mild traumatic brain injury. the tients are frequently bewildered and over- incidence of PCD is reduced significantly whelmed by their symptoms. Despite by three to six months following the in- having relatively mild injuries, they may jury." However, at one year after inj~~ry. continue to be plagued by problems such approximately 15 percent of patients still as headaches. lack of enesgy. dizziness. have disabling symptoms.' '. I* Patients at and an inability to concentrate on or cope high risk of having pessistent PCD symp- with life's stressors. It is not surprising. toms include those with a history of head therefore. that patients become frustrated. injury and older patients (probably above angry, and depressed. ~a~"described 40 years of age).13 Although the cognitive how a person's sense of predictability