DOCSLIB.ORG

AGENDA ITEM 7.2 CITY of LARKSPUR Staff Report June 17

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
AGENDA ITEM 7.2 CITY of LARKSPUR Staff Report June 17 AGENDA ITEM 7.2 CITY OF LARKSPUR Staff Report June 17, 2015 City Council Meeting DATE: June 11, 2015 TO: Honorable Mayor Chu and Members of the City Council FROM: Neal Toft, Planning and Building Director RE: PD-PREC/DR 15-16: INTRODUCE AND WAIVE FIRST READING OF AN ORDINANCE AMENDING THE ROSE GARDEN PRECISE DEVELOPMENT PLAN AND ORDINANCE NO. 972 (DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS) FOR LOT 27 (55 ROSE LANE) OF THE ROSE GARDEN RESIDENTIAL DEVELOPMENT (APN #022-741-01 THRU #022-741-43); LARKSPUR LAND 8 OWNER, APPLICANTS AND PROPERTY OWNER ACTION/REQUEST Hold a public hearing to consider a Draft Ordinance amending the Development Standards of the Rose Garden Precise Development Plan (Ordinance No. 972; Exhibits B and C) to reduce the required 50-foot building and impervious setback requirement from the top-of-bank of the east-west reach of Larkspur Creek. The applicant is requesting a minimum of 48.8 feet for the main building with a 45-foot setback for a 13.5-foot wide portion of the building footprint. Specifically, the applicant requests approval to amend language of Sections 10 and 15 of the Development Standards (Exhibit B) of the Precise Development Plan to adjust the 50-foot building and impervious surface setback solely for Lot 27. The City Council is requested to conduct the public hearing, take public comment, and move to adopt amendment to Ordinance No. 972. ENVIRONMENTAL STATUS The Central Larkspur Specific Plan Environmental Impact Report (CLASP EIR) was certified by the City Council in 2006. An Initial Study (IS) was prepared and a Mitigated Negative Declaration (MND) was approved by the City Council in 2008 at the time the Preliminary Development Plan for Subarea 3 was approved. An Addendum to the CLASP EIR has been prepared per CEQA Guidelines Section 15164 (see attached). 1 Staff Report: 6/17/2015 Rose Garden Residential Development PD-Prec/DR 15-16 Amendment to the Precise Development Plan and Ordinance No. 972 AGENDA ITEM 7.2 BACKGROUND Project History In 2006, the City of Larkspur adopted Resolution 48/06 approving the Central Larkspur Specific Plan (CLASP) which proposed a mixture of residential, retail, recreation, cultural, and civic uses to contribute to the vitality of the Downtown area of the City. Three distinct planning units, or subareas, were identified as part of the CLASP. Subarea 3 encompasses what has been commonly referred to as the Niven Nursery site, a 16.8 acre site proposed for residential uses and community facilities, for which the overall Rose Garden Development was approved. On February 10, 2010, the Larkspur City Council approved the Rose Garden Precise Development Plan (PD-Prec/DR 08-54) for the development of the 42 senior housing condominium units, 8 senior cottage homes, 6 affordable cottage townhomes, and 29 single family detached dwelling on the 16-acre site located within Sub-Area 3 of the CLASP. The approval included the dedication of 0.84 acres for park and recreational uses and 1.59 acres for a ‘Communities Facilities’ site, the combination of which comprise Parcel A of the Rose Garden subdivision. The Precise Development Plan approval included both a 50-foot building impervious surface setback from the top-of- bank of Larkspur Creek (“50-Foot Building Setback”) as well as a 25-foot creek resource buffer from the top-of-bank, as prescribed by the CLASP. The resource buffer does not permit any intrusion of any development as the area would be required to undergo native plant restoration work as a mitigation measure for the project. Construction Permit Issued The initial construction phase of the project began when the City issued permits for site demolition and grading in late 2011. The site preparation phase, including surcharging and remediation of soils, proceeded for over a year before the first permits were issued for model homes in March 2013. Remaining permits for residential structures were then issued on a continuous basis beginning in October of 2013. A building permit to construct a single-family dwelling on Lot 27 of the development was issued September 9, 2014, as one of the few remaining permits to be issued at that point. As of the preparation of this report, all cottages, single-family dwellings and condominium structures are largely completed and occupied, except for a few remaining single-family dwellings that are near completion. Error in Location of Home on Lot 27 (55 Rose Lane). On February 9, 2015, the New Home Company informed the City of Larkspur that the foundation contractor inadvertently miscalculated the placement of the foundation for the home located on 55 Rose Lane (Lot 27). This would have occurred soon after issuance of the permit in September of 2014. They reported that this was not immediately recognized and they discovered this error on January 29, 2015, when the 2 Staff Report: 6/17/2015 Rose Garden Residential Development PD-Prec/DR 15-16 Amendment to the Precise Development Plan and Ordinance No. 972 AGENDA ITEM 7.2 exterior of the home was already completed and the permit was past drywall close- inspection. As a result of the error, a small portion of the rear wall and the entire kitchen “nook” area was located within the 50-foot building and impervious surface setback identified under CLASP and Development Standards of the Rose Garden Precise Development Plan. The New Home Company has since provided survey verification that no other homes along the creek are located within this 50-foot setback limit. After reviewing of the permit situation and discussing the matter with the City Attorney’s office, City staff formally responded to the applicants on February 25, 2015. At that time, staff informed New Home Company that the City could not issue final inspection and occupancy permit unless the encroachment into the setback was either corrected or the Precise Plan was amended to permit the location of the home by revising the required setback (there is no “variance” process prescribed by CLASP or the Precise Plan). On March 27, 2015, the applicants submitted an application to amend the Precise Plan, with additional supporting information, including a biological analysis of the area by WRA Associates and an annual monitoring report on the Native Plant Restoration Plan by LSDA Associates. Request Under the original Precise Development Plan application for the Rose Garden Project, development standards were established for setbacks which include a 50-foot building impervious surface setback from the top-of-bank of Larkspur Creek (“50-Foot Building Setback”). While building foundations and impervious development is prohibited within this setback, typical landscaping and flatwork (pervious pavers and pathways) are allowed contingent upon review and approval by the City of Larkspur Planning Director. The building and impervious surface setback overlaps with the 25-foot creek resource buffer from the top-of-bank. The resource buffer does not permit any intrusion of any development and includes native plant restoration work as a mitigation of the project. The proposed adjustment to the 50-foot setback would not occur within the natural resource buffer. A diagram that depicts both the 50-foot building and impervious surface setback and the 25-foot resource buffer is attached for the Commission’s consideration. The southern rear wall of the subject residence located at 55 Rose Lane (Lot 27) encroaches up to 1.2 feet into the 50-Foot Building Setback and jogs 5 feet into the setback for a span or 13.5 feet at the center of the rear wall (kitchen nook). The applicant is requesting approval to amend the Development standards of the Precise Development Plan (Ordinance No. 972; Exhibit B, Standards and Setbacks) to accommodate the proposed encroachment. A letter has been submitted by Matthew Gray of Perkins Coie, detailing the background on the matter and the applicants’ request. The applicants will present the proposal to the Commission and be available to answer any questions. 3 Staff Report: 6/17/2015 Rose Garden Residential Development PD-Prec/DR 15-16 Amendment to the Precise Development Plan and Ordinance No. 972 AGENDA ITEM 7.2 Proposed Amendments Staff has prepared a draft ordinance (attached) that would amend development standards 10 and 15 of the Precise Development Plan and would add the diagram of the revised setback for reference. The draft ordinance includes diagrams that depict the existing and proposed setback line. Staff is proposing to amend development standards 10 and 15 of the Precise Development Plan to read as follows (with additions in underlines and deletions in strikethrough): 1. New subsection d shall be added to read as follows: “10. Setbacks and Lot Coverage. Setbacks and lot coverage shall be as shown on the approved plans, and consistent with CLASP Policies d-52, 54, and 55, and 63 except as follows: d. Building and Impervious Surface Setback for Lot 27. The required building and impervious setback for the residence on Lot 27 shall be reduced to no less than 48.8 feet for the 56.5 width of the rear wall of the main residence and no less 45 feet for the 13.5-foot wide protrusion located at the center of the rear wall, as depicted on plan titled Exhibit B – Proposed; Rose Garden Lot 27; Precise Plan Amendment, dated May 4, 2015 and included herein in Exhibit C; Project Plans and Standards.” 2. The last sentence of “15. Creek and Buffer Areas” shall be amended to read as follows: “No building or impervious surface may be located closer than 50 feet to the top of the creek bank, except as provided in Section 10d. above.” Attachments include the following which would be incorporated to the amended Ordinance No.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Major Streams and Watersheds of East Marin
    Ch ile no t å V S 29 al å le y Rd I D St d Major Streams and WatershedsR of East Marin San Anto o ni i o n R o d t 9å3 S n an A A å nton io Rd n a S Ma rs ha d ll R P s e e ta y lum e a R R d t L P a a k m e lu vi ta lle Pe R d W i lso n H ill Rd SOULAJULE RESERVOIR L 4 a 2 k e v il North Novato le R d 9 48 7 6 3 ay w 0 gh 1 i H e at St r an Ma in S 3 D 7 N r ova U to n B i lv t d 7å3 e å å n d 77 L å S s d t a n v l o t e B m s STAFFORD LAKE d m H i o S o i g A w h th N d w e o e r East Marin Schools v a to a R n to y A d å Bå 55 1 v R lv t G e å d å ra 0 å Blackpoint e n å å å 63 å S t 59 a A 1 1, ADALINE E KENT MIDDLE SCHOOL 34, LYNWOOD ELEM. SCHOOL 67, RING MOUNTAIN DAY SCHOOL å v ve å r m A h D u t r l 7 D o a n å e L b t o 32 ong r å å e å s å Av a il e 2, ALLAIRE SCHOOL 35, MADRONE CONTINUATION HIGH SCHOOLP 68, ROSS ELEM.
    [Show full text]
  • Ethnohistory and Ethnogeography of the Coast Miwok and Their Neighbors, 1783-1840
    ETHNOHISTORY AND ETHNOGEOGRAPHY OF THE COAST MIWOK AND THEIR NEIGHBORS, 1783-1840 by Randall Milliken Technical Paper presented to: National Park Service, Golden Gate NRA Cultural Resources and Museum Management Division Building 101, Fort Mason San Francisco, California Prepared by: Archaeological/Historical Consultants 609 Aileen Street Oakland, California 94609 June 2009 MANAGEMENT SUMMARY This report documents the locations of Spanish-contact period Coast Miwok regional and local communities in lands of present Marin and Sonoma counties, California. Furthermore, it documents previously unavailable information about those Coast Miwok communities as they struggled to survive and reform themselves within the context of the Franciscan missions between 1783 and 1840. Supplementary information is provided about neighboring Southern Pomo-speaking communities to the north during the same time period. The staff of the Golden Gate National Recreation Area (GGNRA) commissioned this study of the early native people of the Marin Peninsula upon recommendation from the report’s author. He had found that he was amassing a large amount of new information about the early Coast Miwoks at Mission Dolores in San Francisco while he was conducting a GGNRA-funded study of the Ramaytush Ohlone-speaking peoples of the San Francisco Peninsula. The original scope of work for this study called for the analysis and synthesis of sources identifying the Coast Miwok tribal communities that inhabited GGNRA parklands in Marin County prior to Spanish colonization. In addition, it asked for the documentation of cultural ties between those earlier native people and the members of the present-day community of Coast Miwok. The geographic area studied here reaches far to the north of GGNRA lands on the Marin Peninsula to encompass all lands inhabited by Coast Miwoks, as well as lands inhabited by Pomos who intermarried with them at Mission San Rafael.
    [Show full text]
  • Where in the World Is Corte Madera Creek Watershed
    What in the World is the Corte Madera Creek Watershed? Carole d’Alessio 2001 Off the eastern flanks of eastern Mt. Tamalpais, from Carson Ridge, Loma Alta, White’s Hill, and the Sleepy Hollow Divide, rainwater is funneled to the basin below. From these ridge-tops, rain flows down 42 miles of creeks, and traverses 28 square miles of watershed before it spills into the bay at the mouth of Corte Madera Creek near the Larkspur Ferry Terminal. In all there are 27 named creeks. The two major upstream branches of the creek are Fairfax Creek and San Anselmo Creek. After they join, the stream is known as San Anselmo Creek until it reaches Ross, where it is renamed Corte Madera Creek. In addition to there being extensive streams, there is one lake. Phoenix Lake was constructed in 1905 and was part of the system that Marin Municipal Water District purchased in 1912 from Marin Water and Power Company. Although not used today to provide drinking water, its capacity is enough to supply approximately 1230 families with water for a year. The watershed reaches from sea level to an elevation of 2,571 feet at the East Peak of Mount Tamalpais. In the lower reaches of the watershed, a narrow floodplain merges with the tidal marshes and mudflats that surround San Francisco Bay between San Quentin and the Tiburon Peninsula. In the less inhabited upper reaches, lands are mostly owned by MMWD, and San Anselmo and Marin County Open Space districts. Historically the watershed’s creeksides and valley floor were occupied by Coast Miwok people during a period beginning at least 3,600 years ago; their predominance ended about 200 years ago with the arrival of the Spanish.
    [Show full text]
  • Appendix E Lists the Wildlife Species Detected
    BIOLOGICAL ASSESSMENT FOR ROUTINE FLOOD CONTROL MAINTENANCE ACTIVITIES MARIN COUNTY, CALIFORNIA June 2012 Prepared by: County of Marin Department of Public Works P.O. Box 4186 San Rafael, CA 94913-4186 (415) 473-4301 [email protected] TABLE OF CONTENTS SUMMARY .......................................................................................................................... IV 1.0 INTRODUCTION AND METHODS ...................................................................... 6 2.0 EXISTING CONDITIONS ....................................................................................... 9 2.1 SETTING .................................................................................................................... 9 2.2 PLANT COMMUNITIES AND WILDLIFE HABITATS ...................................................... 9 California Annual Grassland ....................................................................................... 10 Northern Coastal Salt Marsh ....................................................................................... 10 Diked Baylands ............................................................................................................. 11 North Coast Riparian Scrub/Forest ............................................................................. 12 Mixed Evergreen Forest ............................................................................................... 12 3.0 SPECIAL-STATUS BIOLOGICAL RESOURCES ............................................ 13 3.1 SPECIAL-STATUS PLANTS
    [Show full text]
  • Central Larkspur Specific Plan Revised Draft EIR EDAW City of Larkspur 4.4-1 Hydrology and Water Quality Table 4.4-1 Tidal Characteristics Datum
    4.4 HYDROLOGY AND WATER QUALITY This section describes the existing hydrologic conditions for the Specific Plan area, including tidal influence, site drainage, sedimentation, flood hazards and water quality. This description of existing conditions is based on a review of existing regional and site information, on site reconnaissance conducted by Philip Williams & Associates (PWA) staff, and by quantitative analyses performed by PWA. Existing information reviewed includes topographic maps (U.S. Geological Survey 1993), historical topographic maps, Flood Insurance Rate Maps (FIRMs) (Federal Emergency Management Agency [FEMA] 1984), and previous studies including Larkspur Creek Channel Study (BSI Consultants, Inc. 1989), Irving Group Property Residential Development Drainage Study (Brian Kangas Foulk 1998), and City of Larkspur Flood Insurance Study (FEMA 1983). Water quality information includes the Water Quality Control Plan for the San Francisco Bay Basin (San Francisco Bay Regional Water Quality Control Board [San Francisco Bay RWQCB] 1995) and the Corte Madera Watershed Resource Evaluation and Information Report (San Francisco Bay RWQCB 1994). Guidelines for managing water quality impacts, particularly from urban runoff, are described in reports from the Marin County Storm Water Pollution Prevention Program (MCSTOPPP) including Action Plan 2005: Protecting and Enhancing Marin County’s Watersheds (Marin County Department of Public Works 2001) and the Condensed Planning and Design Guide for Surface Water Pollution Control Planning and Permanent Best Management Practices (MCSTOPPP 2003). 4.4.1 EXISTING SETTING REGIONAL SETTING Tidal Processes Regional Tidal Characteristics Tidal characteristics from the Corte Madera Creek gauge, approximately 1 mile east-northeast of the Specific Plan area, are shown in Table 4.4-1.
    [Show full text]
  • 3Existing Conditions
    3 EXISTING CONDITIONS 3.1 LAND USES, GENERAL PLAN AND ZONING 15 The aerial photo to the left provides a view of land uses surrounding the Plan area. Adjacent land uses north of the Specific 16 Plan area, across Doherty Drive, are the Mt. Tamalpais Racquet Club (#16 in Figure 14 13 3-1), Hall Middle School (#14), a sewer Photo Key 1. 1 Doherty Park 6 2. Railroad buildings 7 3. City parking lot 4. Downtown 5. American Legion 11 2 6. Larkspur Plaza 7. Abandoned greenhouses 8. Meadowood neighborhood 3 10 9. Larkspur Creek 5 10. Tamalpais High School District 9 facilities 11. Redwood High School 12. Twin Cities Police 13. Piper Park 4 8 14. Hall Middle School 15. Larkspur Boardwalk 16. Mt. Tamalpais Racquet Club Figure 3-1 Aerial Photo, Specific Plan Area 3-1 pumping station, the Twin Cities Police Department headquarters A small triangularly shaped public park (Doherty Park, #1) in (#12) and Piper Park (#13). East of the Specific Plan area, across the northwest corner of the site fronting Magnolia Avenue. Larkspur Creek (Arroyo Holon), are the Tamalpais High School District offices, service buildings and equipment yard and the A partially developed private parcel (#2) containing four Redwood High School campus (#10 and 11 in photo). The buildings: a former railroad station building, now occupied Meadowood residential neighborhood (#8 in photo) is south of the by a restaurant; a former railroad station warming house, Specific Plan area, on the other side of Larkspur Creek. Downtown now used as a crafts workshop; and two one-story Larkspur is adjacent to and extends into the western edge and commercial buildings occupied by retail, commercial, and southwest corner of the project area.
    [Show full text]
  • Marin County, California and Incorporated Areas
    VOLUME 1 OF 3 MARIN COUNTY, CALIFORNIA AND INCORPORATED AREAS COMMUNITY NAME COMMUNITY NUMBER BELVEDERE, CITY OF 060429 Marin County CORTE MADERA, TOWN OF 065023 FAIRFAX, TOWN OF 060175 LARKSPUR, CITY OF 065040 MARIN COUNTY (UNINCORPORATED AREAS) 060173 MILL VALLEY, CITY OF 060177 NOVATO, CITY OF 060178 ROSS, TOWN OF 060179 SAN ANSELMO, TOWN OF 060180 SAN RAFAEL, CITY OF 065058 SAUSALITO, CITY OF 060182 TIBURON, TOWN OF 060430 REVISED March 16, 2016 Federal Emergency Management Agency FLOOD INSURANCE STUDY NUMBER 06041CV001C NOTICE TO FLOOD INSURANCE STUDY USERS Communities participating in the National Flood Insurance Program have established repositories of flood hazard data for floodplain management and flood insurance purposes. This Flood Insurance Study (FIS) may not contain all data available within the repository. It is advisable to contact the community repository for any additional data. Part or all of this FIS may be revised and republished at any time. In addition, part of this FIS may be revised by the Letter of Map Revision process, which does not involve republication or redistribution of the FIS. It is, therefore, the responsibility of the user to consult with community officials and to check the community repository to obtain the most current FIS components. This FIS report was revised on March 16, 2016. Users should refer to Section 10.0, Revisions Description, for further information. Section 10.0 is intended to present the most up-to-date information for specific portions of this FIS report. Therefore, users of this FIS report should be aware that the information presented in Section 10.0 supersedes information in Sections 1.0 through 9.0 of this FIS report.
    [Show full text]
  • Marin County
    Historical Distribution and Current Status of Steelhead/Rainbow Trout (Oncorhynchus mykiss) in Streams of the San Francisco Estuary, California Robert A. Leidy, Environmental Protection Agency, San Francisco, CA Gordon S. Becker, Center for Ecosystem Management and Restoration, Oakland, CA Brett N. Harvey, John Muir Institute of the Environment, University of California, Davis, CA This report should be cited as: Leidy, R.A., G.S. Becker, B.N. Harvey. 2005. Historical distribution and current status of steelhead/rainbow trout (Oncorhynchus mykiss) in streams of the San Francisco Estuary, California. Center for Ecosystem Management and Restoration, Oakland, CA. Center for Ecosystem Management and Restoration MARIN COUNTY Coyote Creek Watershed Coyote Creek originates on the eastern face of the Marin Peninsula range and flows generally east to enter the San Francisco Estuary in Richardson Bay. The Coyote Creek watershed consists of about 3.6 square miles. Oakwood Valley Creek joins Coyote Creek from the south in the lower Tamalpais Valley. Coyote Creek According to local residents, Coyote Creek supported steelhead prior to the construction of a U.S. Army Corps flood project in 1965 (L. Lewis pers. comm.). One location on a branch of Coyote Creek at the GGNRA trailhead along Tennessee Valley Road was sampled in September 1981 as part of a fish distribution study. No salmonids were found (Leidy 1984). Leidy sampled Coyote Creek near the terminus of Northern Avenue in October 1993 and did not find any fish (Leidy 2002). Marin County PWA staff indicates that salmonids do not presently use Coyote Creek (L. Lewis pers. comm.). Assessment: Coyote Creek likely supported steelhead historically.
    [Show full text]
  • Chapter 7, Health & Safety Contents
    CITY OF LARKSPUR, CALIFORNIA GENERAL PLAN CHAPTER 7, HEALTH & SAFETY CONTENTS Chapter 7, Health and Safety Emergency Preparedness Preparedness Goals, Policies and Programs Flooding Flood Control and Storm Drainage Improvements Rise in Sea Level Flood Hazard Goals, Policies, and Programs Seismic and Geologic Hazards Seismic Hazards Effects of Earthquakes Seismic Hazard Goals, Policies, and Programs Geologic Hazards Geologic Hazard Goals, Policies, and Programs Fire Hazards Wildland Fires Fire Goals, Policies, and Programs Hazardous Materials Hazardous Material Goals, Policies, and Programs Air Quality Regulatory Agencies and Standards Sources of Pollutants, and Health Risks Climate and Topography Historic and Current Air Quality Air Quality Goal, Policies, and Programs Noise Exterior Noise Levels and Land Use Compatibility Noise Goals, Policies, and Programs Chapter 7. Community Health and Safety This chapter covers safety, as prescribed by Safety Element provisions of the Government Code, Section 65302(g); and noise, as covered by Noise Element guidelines of the Government Code, Section 65302(f). It also includes air quality. The Bay Area Air Quality Management District (BAAQMD) has strongly urged cities to address air quality in their general plans. Community health and safety involves the protection of the community from natural hazards such as floods, earthquakes, landslides, and fires. It also involves protection from man-made hazards such as air pollution, noise, and hazardous materials. This chapter describes the scope of these hazards, as well as the actions that the City can take to eliminate or reduce the probability of these hazards leading to a major disaster. The overall purpose of this chapter is to-- Protect the community from injury, loss of life, and property damage resulting from natural disasters and hazardous conditions.
    [Show full text]
  • Larkspur Bicycle and Pedestrian Master Plan I
    ACKNOWLEDGMENTS LARKSPUR CITY COUNCIL Catherine Way, Mayor Kevin Haroff, Vice Mayor Larry Chu, Council Member Dan Hillmer, Council Member Ann Morrison, Council Member LARKSPUR CITY STAFF Julian Skinner, Public Works Director Dick Whitley, Recreation Director Alvin Tan, Public Works Junior Engineer TRANSPORTATION AUTHORITY OF MARIN Dianne Steinhauser, Executive Director Scott McDonald, Senior Transportation Planner CONSULTANT TEAM Alta Planning + Design Parisi Transportation Consulting CSW / Stuber-Stroeh Engineering Group Inc. COVER PHOTO Arn Battaglene, NorthBayDigital Additional thanks to all the members of the public who provided support and feedback during the development of this Plan. Last Updated: February 23, 2017 Larkspur Bicycle and Pedestrian Master Plan i TABLE OF CONTENTS PAGE 1. INTRODUCTION 1 2. PLAN GOALS 2 3. COMMUNITY INVOLVEMENT 3 4. CONSISTENCY WITH OTHER PLANS 4 5. LAND USE 7 6. WALKING AND BICYCLING IN LARKSPUR 9 7. EXISTING ACTIVE TRANSPORTATION FACILITIES 14 8. COLLISION HISTORY 21 9. SAFETY & EDUCATION 23 10. BICYCLE PARKING FACILITIES 25 11. MULTI-MODAL CONNECTIONS 28 12. RECOMMENDED ACTIVE TRANSPORTATION FACILITIES 30 13. RECOMMENDED ACTIVE TRANSPORTATION POLICIES AND PROGRAMS 42 14. IMPLEMENTATION 54 APPENDIX A: ATP COMPLIANCE CHECKLIST 55 APPENDIX B: FUNDING SOURCES 57 APPENDIX C: MUNICIPAL CODE 69 APPENDIX D: SHARED-USE PATH AND TRAIL ETIQUETTE 75 APPENDIX E: MARIN COUNTY WAYFINDING PROGRAM 85 APPENDIX F: COMPLETE STREETS POLICY 86 APPENDIX G: CIRCULATION ELEMENT AMENDMENT 90 APPENDIX H: BAY TRAIL
    [Show full text]
  • City of Larkspur, California General Plan Appendix
    CITY OF LARKSPUR, CALIFORNIA GENERAL PLAN APPENDIX & FIGURES CONTENTS Appendix A: Description of Gateways Appendix B: Description of Neighborhoods Appendix C: Designating and Acquiring Private Property for Public Benefit Figures Appendix A: Description of Gateways One's general impression of Larkspur depends on the point from which the community is entered or the place from which the city is observed. Larkspur is entered at six major gateways - one from the east (from East Sir Francis Drake Boulevard alongside San Quentin Prison); one from the north (descending from the Southern Heights Ridge southbound on US Highway 101); two from the west (southbound on College Avenue from the College of Marin, and eastbound on Sir Francis Drake Boulevard from Wolfe Grade Drive); and two from the south (northbound on Magnolia Avenue from Corte Madera, and northbound on US Highway 101 above the NWPRR right-of-way and just south of - before - the Lucky Drive intersection). The visual impressions from each of these six gateways are quite different and are reviewed below: 1. From the east (westbound on East Sir Francis Drake Boulevard past San Quentin Prison) Coming by car across the bridge from Richmond on Interstate 580, the driver exits onto a ramp and frontage road that parallels the freeway for a little more than half-a-mile. On the right are industrial buildings in San Rafael. On the left is a sparsely wooded hillside. The frontage road swings left and over the I-580 Freeway. On the right are mostly barren hillsides and a major intersection with Andersen Boulevard. On the left can be seen the staff housing, the outer yards, and the high walls of the State prison.
    [Show full text]
  • 1. Air Quality
    1. AIR QUALITY The following discussion provides an overview of existing air quality conditions in and around the vicinity of the Larkspur SMART Station Area Plan (Plan) area and the San Francisco Bay Area. Ambient air quality standards and the regulatory framework related to air quality are summarized. Climate, air quality conditions, and typical air pollutant types and sources are described. A. REGULATORY FRAMEWORK Air quality standards, the regulatory framework, and State and federal attainment status are discussed below. 1. Air Quality Standards Pursuant to the federal Clean Air Act (CAA) of 1970, the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) established national ambient air quality standards (NAAQS). The NAAQS were established for major pollutants, termed “criteria” pollutants. Criteria pollutants are defined as those pollutants for which the federal and State governments have established ambient air quality standards, or criteria, for outdoor concentrations in order to protect public health. Both the EPA and the California Air Resources Board (CARB) have established ambient air quality standards for common pollutants: carbon monoxide (CO), ozone (O3), nitrogen dioxide (NO2), sulfur dioxide (SO2), lead (Pb), and suspended particulate matter (PM). In addition, the State has set stand- ards for sulfates, hydrogen sulfide, vinyl chloride, and visibility reducing particles. These standards are designed to protect the health and welfare of the public with a reasonable margin of safety. These ambient air quality standards are levels of contaminants which represent safe levels that avoid specific adverse health effects associated with each criteria pollutant. Federal standards include both primary and secondary standards. Primary standards set limits to protect public health, including the health of sensitive populations such as asthmatics, children, and the elderly.
    [Show full text]