DOCSLIB.ORG

0.2 Title Page ADEIR Vol I

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
0.2 Title Page ADEIR Vol I 4.0 – ENVIRONMENTAL SETTING , IMPACTS AND MITIGATION MEASURES 4.0 INTRODUCTION TO THE ENVIRONMENTAL ANALYSIS AND ASSUMPTIONS USED The following is an introduction to the environmental analysis of project-specific and cumulative impacts and general assumptions used in the analysis. The reader is referred to the individual technical sections of the Draft EIR regarding specific assumptions and methodology used in the analysis. ANALYSIS ASSUMPTIONS GENERALLY USED TO EVALUATE THE IMPACTS OF THE TOWN OF CORTE MADERA GENERAL PLAN BASELINE ENVIRONMENTAL CONDITIONS ASSUMED IN THE DRAFT EIR Section 15125(a) of the State CEQA Guidelines requires that an EIR include a description of the physical environmental conditions in the vicinity of a project, as they exist at the time the Notice of Preparation (NOP) is published. The CEQA Guidelines also specify that this description of the physical environmental conditions should serve as the baseline physical conditions by which a lead agency determines whether impacts of a project are considered significant. The environmental setting conditions of the Town of Corte Madera and the surrounding area are described in detail in the technical sections of the Draft EIR (see Sections 4.1 through 4.12). In general, these setting discussions describe the setting conditions of the Town of Corte Madera and the surrounding area as they existed when the NOP for the project was released on June 3, 2005. In addition, the Draft EIR includes updated setting information since release of the NOP, such as the status of large-scale development projects in the Town and surrounding region (see Table 4.0-2 and Figure 4.0-1). BUILDOUT ASSUMPTIONS UNDER THE GENERAL PLAN WITHIN EXISTING TOWN LIMITS Table 4.0-1 identifies land use categories under the proposed General Plan Update within existing Town limits at buildout. TABLE 4.0-1 PROPOSED TOWN OF CORTE MADERA GENERAL PLAN LAND USE SUMMARY AT BUILDOUT WITHIN THE TOWN LIMITS Land Use Category Acreage Residential Designations Open Residential (0 to 0.2 du/ac) 43 Hillside Residential (0.2 to 2.2 du/ac) 192 Low-Density Residential (LDR) (0.2 to 6.0 du/ac) 507 Medium-Density Residential (MDR) (6.0 to 11.0 du/ac) 38 High-Density Residential (HDR) (11 to 25 du/gac w/ a density bonus 1 up to 31.5 du/gac) Commercial Designations Local-Serving Commercial (FAR to 0.34) 12 Office (FAR to 0.34) 2 Mixed Use (MU) Designations MU Region-Serving Commercial (FAR to 0.60; and 15.1 to 25.0 and 59 up to 31.0 du/ac w/density bonus) Town of Corte Madera General Plan Update April 2008 Draft Environmental Impact Report 4.0-1 4.0 INTRODUCTION TO THE ENVIRONMENTAL ANALYSIS AND ASSUMPTIONS USED Land Use Category Acreage MU: Old Corte Madera Square (FAR to 1.0; and 15.1 to 25.0 and up 5 to 31.0 du/ac w/density bonus) MU Commercial (FAR to 0.34; and 15.1 to 25.0 and up to 31.0 du/ac 79 w/density bonus) Public Use Designations Public and Semi-Public Facilities (FAR to 0.35) 77 Parks 93 Open Space Water Bodies and Waterways 788 Wetlands and Marshlands 440 Hillside Open Space 159 Total 2,495 Source: General Plan Land Use Map, 2004 Based on Traffic Analysis Zone (TAZ) mapping, historic and maximum residential development densities (i.e., Open Residential – 0.2 dwelling units per acre, Hillside – 2.2 dwelling units per acre, LDR – 6.0 dwelling units per acre, MDR – 11 dwelling units per acre, HDR – 25 dwelling units per acre) and consideration of development of net acreage in the Town, it is anticipated that buildout of the proposed General Plan Update would result in approximately 4,118 housing units and a population of approximately 9,917 within the Town limits by the year 2025. The buildout of the General Plan would consist of the increase in floor area ratio (FAR) for commercial development in the two regional shopping centers (the Village and the Town Center) and infill development (218 units). The population within the Town of Corte Madera in 2005 was approximately 9,400, and the number of housing units was approximately 3,900. Therefore, the buildout of the proposed General Plan Update would consist of a slight increase in housing units through infill development. It should be noted that these estimates of dwelling units and population do not constitute a dwelling unit or population cap for the Town. BUILDOUT ASSUMPTIONS UNDER THE GENERAL PLAN ASSOCIATED WITH THE PLANNING AREA As described in Section 3.0, Project Description, the proposed General Plan Update identifies the Planning Area, which is the equivalent to the existing Town’s sphere of influence and includes all lands within the incorporated Town limits, a large area within San Francisco Bay, lands just beyond the southern Town limit (near Tiburon and the Ring Mountain Open Space Preserve), and the area encompassed by the Greenbrae Boardwalk. Assumptions used in the environmental analysis for these areas are described below. There are several areas within the Planning Area that cannot be developed with the buildout of the proposed General Plan Update. These areas include waters of the San Francisco Bay, including all tidelands, wetlands, and marshlands, and dedicated open space lands along ridgelines and hillsides. General Plan Update Town of Corte Madera Draft Environmental Impact Report April 2008 4.0-2 4.0 INTRODUCTION TO THE ENVIRONMENTAL ANALYSIS AND ASSUMPTIONS USED TABLE 4.0-2 PROPOSED AND APPROVED LARGE -SCALE RESIDENTIAL AND COMMERCIAL PROJECTS IN CORTE MADERA Map Total Number of Total Commercial Name of Project Use Total Acreage Location Status Number Dwelling Units Square Footage Corte Madera Projects 1 1421 Casa Buena Dr. Residential 8 0 1.23 1421 & 1425 Casa Buena Drive APP MMWD Corporation Yard 2 Commercial 0 5,300 4.95 220 Tamal Vista Blvd. CC Lab Building San Clemente Housing & 3 Mixed Use 79 68,665 3.51 25 San Clemente Drive UC Self Storage 4 The Cheesecake Factory Commercial 0 8,537 16.55 1736 Redwood Hwy. CC Marin County Projects 1 Paradise Cay North Residential 31 0 24.8 Paradise Drive in unincorporated Tiburon UC 3820 Paradise Drive in unincorporated 2 Sorokko Master Plan Residential 5 0 18.9 UR Tiburon Larkspur Projects Bordered by Magnolia Ave., East Ward St., Meadow Dr., Larkspur Creek, and Central Larkspur Area 5 Mixed Use 22.00 Doherty Dr.; and the entire Doherty Dr. UR Specific Plan right-of-way from Magnolia Ave. to the city limit NE of the intersection of East Sir Francis 6 Drake's Cove Residential 23 0 10.00 UC Drake Blvd. & Larkspur Landing Circle East of the intersection of East Sir Francis 7 Drakes Way Residential 24 0 8.00 APP Drake Blvd. & Larkspur Landing Circle 8 Elm Crest Subdivision Residential 8 0 8.00 Elm Avenue CC 9 Marin Rowing Commercial 0 13,475 0.60 50 Drakes Landing Way CC 10 Sanitary District Property Mixed Use 151 82,000 10.65 200 Larkspur Landing Circle APP Town of Corte Madera General Plan Update April 2008 Draft Environmental Impact Report 4.0-5 4.0 INTRODUCTION TO THE ENVIRONMENTAL ANALYSIS AND ASSUMPTIONS USED Map Total Number of Total Commercial Name of Project Use Total Acreage Location Status Number Dwelling Units Square Footage Mill Valley Projects 11 Country Club Estates Residential 5 0 11.17 End of Sarah UC 12 Old Mill Commons Residential 10 0 0.23 8 Old Mill APP 13 Camino Alto Town Homes Residential 20 0 1.00 Camino Alto and E. Blithedale UR 14 Von der Werth Mixed Use 20 5,000 1.00 Miller Avenue and Reed Street UR 15 Coopersmith Residential 13 0 N/A Miller Avenue UR 16 La Goma Residential 20 0 N/A 5, 7, 9 La Goma UR Tiburon Projects 17 Belvedere/Tiburon Library Commercial 0 17,075 0.37 1501-1503 Tiburon Blvd. APP 18 Caceres Mixed Use Mixed Use 3 1,966 0.00 41 Main Street CC 19 Easton Point Residential 40 0 110.00 Mar West & Esperanza Street WD/E 20 Ling Precise Development Residential 3 0 5.80 Stony Hill Road WD/E 21 Parente Precise Residential 2 0 10.00 Antonette/Parente Drive UR 22 Tiburon Glen Residential 3 0 26.03 Paradise Drive/Norman Way APP 23 Tiburon Court Residential 3 0 13 Trestle Glen Boulevard APP 24 Rabin/SODA Residential 13 0 50 Paradise Drive/Seafirth Drive UR Kol Shofar Synagogue 25 Commercial 0 12,500 N/A 215 Blackfield Drive UR Expansion Key for Project Status: UR: Under Review, APP: Approved, UC: Under Construction, CC: Construction Complete, WD/E: Withdrawn, Denied, Expired Source: PROPDEV 42 Semi-Annual Proposed Development Survey, An Inventory of Proposed Development Projects in Marin County as of October, 2006. Published by the Marin County Community Development Agency in cooperation with the Planning Departments of the Cities and Towns of Marin 7/1/2006. General Plan Update Town of Corte Madera Draft Environmental Impact Report April 2008 4.0-6 4.0 INTRODUCTION TO THE ENVIRONMENTAL ANALYSIS AND ASSUMPTIONS USED COMMUNITY PLAN AREAS The General Plan Update proposes Community Plans for Old Corte Madera Square, the Fifer/Tamal Vista area, the Paradise/San Clemente area, and the Tamalpais Drive/Casa Buena Drive area. These areas are further described in Section 3.0, Project Description. Old Corte Madera Square The area surrounding Old Corte Madera Square effectively serves as one of the “centers” of the Town. The Town is committed to enhancing the area to promote pedestrian and bicycle activity and local businesses and to improve circulation along the area roads.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Major Streams and Watersheds of East Marin
    Ch ile no t å V S 29 al å le y Rd I D St d Major Streams and WatershedsR of East Marin San Anto o ni i o n R o d t 9å3 S n an A A å nton io Rd n a S Ma rs ha d ll R P s e e ta y lum e a R R d t L P a a k m e lu vi ta lle Pe R d W i lso n H ill Rd SOULAJULE RESERVOIR L 4 a 2 k e v il North Novato le R d 9 48 7 6 3 ay w 0 gh 1 i H e at St r an Ma in S 3 D 7 N r ova U to n B i lv t d 7å3 e å å n d 77 L å S s d t a n v l o t e B m s STAFFORD LAKE d m H i o S o i g A w h th N d w e o e r East Marin Schools v a to a R n to y A d å Bå 55 1 v R lv t G e å d å ra 0 å Blackpoint e n å å å 63 å S t 59 a A 1 1, ADALINE E KENT MIDDLE SCHOOL 34, LYNWOOD ELEM. SCHOOL 67, RING MOUNTAIN DAY SCHOOL å v ve å r m A h D u t r l 7 D o a n å e L b t o 32 ong r å å e å s å Av a il e 2, ALLAIRE SCHOOL 35, MADRONE CONTINUATION HIGH SCHOOLP 68, ROSS ELEM.
    [Show full text]
  • Ethnohistory and Ethnogeography of the Coast Miwok and Their Neighbors, 1783-1840
    ETHNOHISTORY AND ETHNOGEOGRAPHY OF THE COAST MIWOK AND THEIR NEIGHBORS, 1783-1840 by Randall Milliken Technical Paper presented to: National Park Service, Golden Gate NRA Cultural Resources and Museum Management Division Building 101, Fort Mason San Francisco, California Prepared by: Archaeological/Historical Consultants 609 Aileen Street Oakland, California 94609 June 2009 MANAGEMENT SUMMARY This report documents the locations of Spanish-contact period Coast Miwok regional and local communities in lands of present Marin and Sonoma counties, California. Furthermore, it documents previously unavailable information about those Coast Miwok communities as they struggled to survive and reform themselves within the context of the Franciscan missions between 1783 and 1840. Supplementary information is provided about neighboring Southern Pomo-speaking communities to the north during the same time period. The staff of the Golden Gate National Recreation Area (GGNRA) commissioned this study of the early native people of the Marin Peninsula upon recommendation from the report’s author. He had found that he was amassing a large amount of new information about the early Coast Miwoks at Mission Dolores in San Francisco while he was conducting a GGNRA-funded study of the Ramaytush Ohlone-speaking peoples of the San Francisco Peninsula. The original scope of work for this study called for the analysis and synthesis of sources identifying the Coast Miwok tribal communities that inhabited GGNRA parklands in Marin County prior to Spanish colonization. In addition, it asked for the documentation of cultural ties between those earlier native people and the members of the present-day community of Coast Miwok. The geographic area studied here reaches far to the north of GGNRA lands on the Marin Peninsula to encompass all lands inhabited by Coast Miwoks, as well as lands inhabited by Pomos who intermarried with them at Mission San Rafael.
    [Show full text]
  • AGENDA ITEM 7.2 CITY of LARKSPUR Staff Report June 17
    AGENDA ITEM 7.2 CITY OF LARKSPUR Staff Report June 17, 2015 City Council Meeting DATE: June 11, 2015 TO: Honorable Mayor Chu and Members of the City Council FROM: Neal Toft, Planning and Building Director RE: PD-PREC/DR 15-16: INTRODUCE AND WAIVE FIRST READING OF AN ORDINANCE AMENDING THE ROSE GARDEN PRECISE DEVELOPMENT PLAN AND ORDINANCE NO. 972 (DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS) FOR LOT 27 (55 ROSE LANE) OF THE ROSE GARDEN RESIDENTIAL DEVELOPMENT (APN #022-741-01 THRU #022-741-43); LARKSPUR LAND 8 OWNER, APPLICANTS AND PROPERTY OWNER ACTION/REQUEST Hold a public hearing to consider a Draft Ordinance amending the Development Standards of the Rose Garden Precise Development Plan (Ordinance No. 972; Exhibits B and C) to reduce the required 50-foot building and impervious setback requirement from the top-of-bank of the east-west reach of Larkspur Creek. The applicant is requesting a minimum of 48.8 feet for the main building with a 45-foot setback for a 13.5-foot wide portion of the building footprint. Specifically, the applicant requests approval to amend language of Sections 10 and 15 of the Development Standards (Exhibit B) of the Precise Development Plan to adjust the 50-foot building and impervious surface setback solely for Lot 27. The City Council is requested to conduct the public hearing, take public comment, and move to adopt amendment to Ordinance No. 972. ENVIRONMENTAL STATUS The Central Larkspur Specific Plan Environmental Impact Report (CLASP EIR) was certified by the City Council in 2006. An Initial Study (IS) was prepared and a Mitigated Negative Declaration (MND) was approved by the City Council in 2008 at the time the Preliminary Development Plan for Subarea 3 was approved.
    [Show full text]
  • Where in the World Is Corte Madera Creek Watershed
    What in the World is the Corte Madera Creek Watershed? Carole d’Alessio 2001 Off the eastern flanks of eastern Mt. Tamalpais, from Carson Ridge, Loma Alta, White’s Hill, and the Sleepy Hollow Divide, rainwater is funneled to the basin below. From these ridge-tops, rain flows down 42 miles of creeks, and traverses 28 square miles of watershed before it spills into the bay at the mouth of Corte Madera Creek near the Larkspur Ferry Terminal. In all there are 27 named creeks. The two major upstream branches of the creek are Fairfax Creek and San Anselmo Creek. After they join, the stream is known as San Anselmo Creek until it reaches Ross, where it is renamed Corte Madera Creek. In addition to there being extensive streams, there is one lake. Phoenix Lake was constructed in 1905 and was part of the system that Marin Municipal Water District purchased in 1912 from Marin Water and Power Company. Although not used today to provide drinking water, its capacity is enough to supply approximately 1230 families with water for a year. The watershed reaches from sea level to an elevation of 2,571 feet at the East Peak of Mount Tamalpais. In the lower reaches of the watershed, a narrow floodplain merges with the tidal marshes and mudflats that surround San Francisco Bay between San Quentin and the Tiburon Peninsula. In the less inhabited upper reaches, lands are mostly owned by MMWD, and San Anselmo and Marin County Open Space districts. Historically the watershed’s creeksides and valley floor were occupied by Coast Miwok people during a period beginning at least 3,600 years ago; their predominance ended about 200 years ago with the arrival of the Spanish.
    [Show full text]
  • Appendix E Lists the Wildlife Species Detected
    BIOLOGICAL ASSESSMENT FOR ROUTINE FLOOD CONTROL MAINTENANCE ACTIVITIES MARIN COUNTY, CALIFORNIA June 2012 Prepared by: County of Marin Department of Public Works P.O. Box 4186 San Rafael, CA 94913-4186 (415) 473-4301 [email protected] TABLE OF CONTENTS SUMMARY .......................................................................................................................... IV 1.0 INTRODUCTION AND METHODS ...................................................................... 6 2.0 EXISTING CONDITIONS ....................................................................................... 9 2.1 SETTING .................................................................................................................... 9 2.2 PLANT COMMUNITIES AND WILDLIFE HABITATS ...................................................... 9 California Annual Grassland ....................................................................................... 10 Northern Coastal Salt Marsh ....................................................................................... 10 Diked Baylands ............................................................................................................. 11 North Coast Riparian Scrub/Forest ............................................................................. 12 Mixed Evergreen Forest ............................................................................................... 12 3.0 SPECIAL-STATUS BIOLOGICAL RESOURCES ............................................ 13 3.1 SPECIAL-STATUS PLANTS
    [Show full text]
  • Central Larkspur Specific Plan Revised Draft EIR EDAW City of Larkspur 4.4-1 Hydrology and Water Quality Table 4.4-1 Tidal Characteristics Datum
    4.4 HYDROLOGY AND WATER QUALITY This section describes the existing hydrologic conditions for the Specific Plan area, including tidal influence, site drainage, sedimentation, flood hazards and water quality. This description of existing conditions is based on a review of existing regional and site information, on site reconnaissance conducted by Philip Williams & Associates (PWA) staff, and by quantitative analyses performed by PWA. Existing information reviewed includes topographic maps (U.S. Geological Survey 1993), historical topographic maps, Flood Insurance Rate Maps (FIRMs) (Federal Emergency Management Agency [FEMA] 1984), and previous studies including Larkspur Creek Channel Study (BSI Consultants, Inc. 1989), Irving Group Property Residential Development Drainage Study (Brian Kangas Foulk 1998), and City of Larkspur Flood Insurance Study (FEMA 1983). Water quality information includes the Water Quality Control Plan for the San Francisco Bay Basin (San Francisco Bay Regional Water Quality Control Board [San Francisco Bay RWQCB] 1995) and the Corte Madera Watershed Resource Evaluation and Information Report (San Francisco Bay RWQCB 1994). Guidelines for managing water quality impacts, particularly from urban runoff, are described in reports from the Marin County Storm Water Pollution Prevention Program (MCSTOPPP) including Action Plan 2005: Protecting and Enhancing Marin County’s Watersheds (Marin County Department of Public Works 2001) and the Condensed Planning and Design Guide for Surface Water Pollution Control Planning and Permanent Best Management Practices (MCSTOPPP 2003). 4.4.1 EXISTING SETTING REGIONAL SETTING Tidal Processes Regional Tidal Characteristics Tidal characteristics from the Corte Madera Creek gauge, approximately 1 mile east-northeast of the Specific Plan area, are shown in Table 4.4-1.
    [Show full text]
  • 3Existing Conditions
    3 EXISTING CONDITIONS 3.1 LAND USES, GENERAL PLAN AND ZONING 15 The aerial photo to the left provides a view of land uses surrounding the Plan area. Adjacent land uses north of the Specific 16 Plan area, across Doherty Drive, are the Mt. Tamalpais Racquet Club (#16 in Figure 14 13 3-1), Hall Middle School (#14), a sewer Photo Key 1. 1 Doherty Park 6 2. Railroad buildings 7 3. City parking lot 4. Downtown 5. American Legion 11 2 6. Larkspur Plaza 7. Abandoned greenhouses 8. Meadowood neighborhood 3 10 9. Larkspur Creek 5 10. Tamalpais High School District 9 facilities 11. Redwood High School 12. Twin Cities Police 13. Piper Park 4 8 14. Hall Middle School 15. Larkspur Boardwalk 16. Mt. Tamalpais Racquet Club Figure 3-1 Aerial Photo, Specific Plan Area 3-1 pumping station, the Twin Cities Police Department headquarters A small triangularly shaped public park (Doherty Park, #1) in (#12) and Piper Park (#13). East of the Specific Plan area, across the northwest corner of the site fronting Magnolia Avenue. Larkspur Creek (Arroyo Holon), are the Tamalpais High School District offices, service buildings and equipment yard and the A partially developed private parcel (#2) containing four Redwood High School campus (#10 and 11 in photo). The buildings: a former railroad station building, now occupied Meadowood residential neighborhood (#8 in photo) is south of the by a restaurant; a former railroad station warming house, Specific Plan area, on the other side of Larkspur Creek. Downtown now used as a crafts workshop; and two one-story Larkspur is adjacent to and extends into the western edge and commercial buildings occupied by retail, commercial, and southwest corner of the project area.
    [Show full text]
  • Marin County, California and Incorporated Areas
    VOLUME 1 OF 3 MARIN COUNTY, CALIFORNIA AND INCORPORATED AREAS COMMUNITY NAME COMMUNITY NUMBER BELVEDERE, CITY OF 060429 Marin County CORTE MADERA, TOWN OF 065023 FAIRFAX, TOWN OF 060175 LARKSPUR, CITY OF 065040 MARIN COUNTY (UNINCORPORATED AREAS) 060173 MILL VALLEY, CITY OF 060177 NOVATO, CITY OF 060178 ROSS, TOWN OF 060179 SAN ANSELMO, TOWN OF 060180 SAN RAFAEL, CITY OF 065058 SAUSALITO, CITY OF 060182 TIBURON, TOWN OF 060430 REVISED March 16, 2016 Federal Emergency Management Agency FLOOD INSURANCE STUDY NUMBER 06041CV001C NOTICE TO FLOOD INSURANCE STUDY USERS Communities participating in the National Flood Insurance Program have established repositories of flood hazard data for floodplain management and flood insurance purposes. This Flood Insurance Study (FIS) may not contain all data available within the repository. It is advisable to contact the community repository for any additional data. Part or all of this FIS may be revised and republished at any time. In addition, part of this FIS may be revised by the Letter of Map Revision process, which does not involve republication or redistribution of the FIS. It is, therefore, the responsibility of the user to consult with community officials and to check the community repository to obtain the most current FIS components. This FIS report was revised on March 16, 2016. Users should refer to Section 10.0, Revisions Description, for further information. Section 10.0 is intended to present the most up-to-date information for specific portions of this FIS report. Therefore, users of this FIS report should be aware that the information presented in Section 10.0 supersedes information in Sections 1.0 through 9.0 of this FIS report.
    [Show full text]
  • Marin County
    Historical Distribution and Current Status of Steelhead/Rainbow Trout (Oncorhynchus mykiss) in Streams of the San Francisco Estuary, California Robert A. Leidy, Environmental Protection Agency, San Francisco, CA Gordon S. Becker, Center for Ecosystem Management and Restoration, Oakland, CA Brett N. Harvey, John Muir Institute of the Environment, University of California, Davis, CA This report should be cited as: Leidy, R.A., G.S. Becker, B.N. Harvey. 2005. Historical distribution and current status of steelhead/rainbow trout (Oncorhynchus mykiss) in streams of the San Francisco Estuary, California. Center for Ecosystem Management and Restoration, Oakland, CA. Center for Ecosystem Management and Restoration MARIN COUNTY Coyote Creek Watershed Coyote Creek originates on the eastern face of the Marin Peninsula range and flows generally east to enter the San Francisco Estuary in Richardson Bay. The Coyote Creek watershed consists of about 3.6 square miles. Oakwood Valley Creek joins Coyote Creek from the south in the lower Tamalpais Valley. Coyote Creek According to local residents, Coyote Creek supported steelhead prior to the construction of a U.S. Army Corps flood project in 1965 (L. Lewis pers. comm.). One location on a branch of Coyote Creek at the GGNRA trailhead along Tennessee Valley Road was sampled in September 1981 as part of a fish distribution study. No salmonids were found (Leidy 1984). Leidy sampled Coyote Creek near the terminus of Northern Avenue in October 1993 and did not find any fish (Leidy 2002). Marin County PWA staff indicates that salmonids do not presently use Coyote Creek (L. Lewis pers. comm.). Assessment: Coyote Creek likely supported steelhead historically.
    [Show full text]
  • Chapter 7, Health & Safety Contents
    CITY OF LARKSPUR, CALIFORNIA GENERAL PLAN CHAPTER 7, HEALTH & SAFETY CONTENTS Chapter 7, Health and Safety Emergency Preparedness Preparedness Goals, Policies and Programs Flooding Flood Control and Storm Drainage Improvements Rise in Sea Level Flood Hazard Goals, Policies, and Programs Seismic and Geologic Hazards Seismic Hazards Effects of Earthquakes Seismic Hazard Goals, Policies, and Programs Geologic Hazards Geologic Hazard Goals, Policies, and Programs Fire Hazards Wildland Fires Fire Goals, Policies, and Programs Hazardous Materials Hazardous Material Goals, Policies, and Programs Air Quality Regulatory Agencies and Standards Sources of Pollutants, and Health Risks Climate and Topography Historic and Current Air Quality Air Quality Goal, Policies, and Programs Noise Exterior Noise Levels and Land Use Compatibility Noise Goals, Policies, and Programs Chapter 7. Community Health and Safety This chapter covers safety, as prescribed by Safety Element provisions of the Government Code, Section 65302(g); and noise, as covered by Noise Element guidelines of the Government Code, Section 65302(f). It also includes air quality. The Bay Area Air Quality Management District (BAAQMD) has strongly urged cities to address air quality in their general plans. Community health and safety involves the protection of the community from natural hazards such as floods, earthquakes, landslides, and fires. It also involves protection from man-made hazards such as air pollution, noise, and hazardous materials. This chapter describes the scope of these hazards, as well as the actions that the City can take to eliminate or reduce the probability of these hazards leading to a major disaster. The overall purpose of this chapter is to-- Protect the community from injury, loss of life, and property damage resulting from natural disasters and hazardous conditions.
    [Show full text]
  • Larkspur Bicycle and Pedestrian Master Plan I
    ACKNOWLEDGMENTS LARKSPUR CITY COUNCIL Catherine Way, Mayor Kevin Haroff, Vice Mayor Larry Chu, Council Member Dan Hillmer, Council Member Ann Morrison, Council Member LARKSPUR CITY STAFF Julian Skinner, Public Works Director Dick Whitley, Recreation Director Alvin Tan, Public Works Junior Engineer TRANSPORTATION AUTHORITY OF MARIN Dianne Steinhauser, Executive Director Scott McDonald, Senior Transportation Planner CONSULTANT TEAM Alta Planning + Design Parisi Transportation Consulting CSW / Stuber-Stroeh Engineering Group Inc. COVER PHOTO Arn Battaglene, NorthBayDigital Additional thanks to all the members of the public who provided support and feedback during the development of this Plan. Last Updated: February 23, 2017 Larkspur Bicycle and Pedestrian Master Plan i TABLE OF CONTENTS PAGE 1. INTRODUCTION 1 2. PLAN GOALS 2 3. COMMUNITY INVOLVEMENT 3 4. CONSISTENCY WITH OTHER PLANS 4 5. LAND USE 7 6. WALKING AND BICYCLING IN LARKSPUR 9 7. EXISTING ACTIVE TRANSPORTATION FACILITIES 14 8. COLLISION HISTORY 21 9. SAFETY & EDUCATION 23 10. BICYCLE PARKING FACILITIES 25 11. MULTI-MODAL CONNECTIONS 28 12. RECOMMENDED ACTIVE TRANSPORTATION FACILITIES 30 13. RECOMMENDED ACTIVE TRANSPORTATION POLICIES AND PROGRAMS 42 14. IMPLEMENTATION 54 APPENDIX A: ATP COMPLIANCE CHECKLIST 55 APPENDIX B: FUNDING SOURCES 57 APPENDIX C: MUNICIPAL CODE 69 APPENDIX D: SHARED-USE PATH AND TRAIL ETIQUETTE 75 APPENDIX E: MARIN COUNTY WAYFINDING PROGRAM 85 APPENDIX F: COMPLETE STREETS POLICY 86 APPENDIX G: CIRCULATION ELEMENT AMENDMENT 90 APPENDIX H: BAY TRAIL
    [Show full text]
  • City of Larkspur, California General Plan Appendix
    CITY OF LARKSPUR, CALIFORNIA GENERAL PLAN APPENDIX & FIGURES CONTENTS Appendix A: Description of Gateways Appendix B: Description of Neighborhoods Appendix C: Designating and Acquiring Private Property for Public Benefit Figures Appendix A: Description of Gateways One's general impression of Larkspur depends on the point from which the community is entered or the place from which the city is observed. Larkspur is entered at six major gateways - one from the east (from East Sir Francis Drake Boulevard alongside San Quentin Prison); one from the north (descending from the Southern Heights Ridge southbound on US Highway 101); two from the west (southbound on College Avenue from the College of Marin, and eastbound on Sir Francis Drake Boulevard from Wolfe Grade Drive); and two from the south (northbound on Magnolia Avenue from Corte Madera, and northbound on US Highway 101 above the NWPRR right-of-way and just south of - before - the Lucky Drive intersection). The visual impressions from each of these six gateways are quite different and are reviewed below: 1. From the east (westbound on East Sir Francis Drake Boulevard past San Quentin Prison) Coming by car across the bridge from Richmond on Interstate 580, the driver exits onto a ramp and frontage road that parallels the freeway for a little more than half-a-mile. On the right are industrial buildings in San Rafael. On the left is a sparsely wooded hillside. The frontage road swings left and over the I-580 Freeway. On the right are mostly barren hillsides and a major intersection with Andersen Boulevard. On the left can be seen the staff housing, the outer yards, and the high walls of the State prison.
    [Show full text]