Home Inequity: Race, Wealth, and Housing in St. Louis Since 1940.*
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Home Inequity: Race, Wealth, and Housing in St. Louis since 1940.* Colin Gordon, University of Iowa (History) [email protected] Sarah K. Bruch, University of Iowa (Sociology) [email protected] * The authors thank Kyu Young Lee, Jennifer Marks, and Ashley Dorn for research assistance, Matt Nelson of the Minnesota Population Center for help with the 1940 full-count Census, and participants at the Race and Space Seminar, Hall Center, University of Kansas, for comments on an earlier version. Funding provided by a University of Iowa, Office of Vice President for Research, Internal Funding Initiative. Direct correspondence to Colin Gordon, Department of History, University of Iowa, 280 Schaeffer Hall, Iowa City, IA 52242 [email protected]. Manuscript Home Inequity: Race, Wealth, and Housing in St. Louis since 1940 There are few starker measures of economic inequality, in terms of either distributional outcomes or historical implications, than the racial wealth gap. The black-white wealth gap has persisted despite the promise of Reconstruction, the Great Migration, and the legal and political gains of the long civil rights movement. Wealth, in turn, is not just a distributional marker; it is also a key determinant of economic security, mobility, and opportunity (Spilerman 2000; Conley 1999; Oliver and Shapiro 2006). Wealth allows individuals and families to smooth out short-term volatility in income (O’Brien 2012; Hacker 2008;), to bolster future income through education and other investments in human capital (Pfeffer 2011; Conley 1999; Altonji and Doraszelski 2005), and to offer the next generation a “starting gate” advantage in the form of both home ownership (a “de facto purchase of educational resources” [Pfeffer 2011] in the U.S. setting) and in vivos transfers (assistance buying a home, paying for college, or starting a business) or inheritances (Pfeffer 2016; Avery and Rendall, 2002, 1303; Conley 1999; Charles 2002; Henretta 1984). The racial wealth gap is both the outcome of a long history of racial inequality and a key mechanism sustaining it across generations (Conley 1999; Pfeffer 2011). Oliver and Shapiro (2006) characterize the racial wealth gap as a “sedimentary” strata of inequality—a metaphor that captures both the endurance and hardening of past forms of discrimination, and its imperviousness to solutions. Slavery, of course, created a singularly dismal starting point for black wealth (Ransom and Sutch 2001), a disadvantage sustained by the labor, penal, and credit institutions of the Jim Crow South (Nier 2007; Alston and Ferrie 1985), the deeply-segregated labor and housing markets of the urban North (Fox-Gotham 2002; Hirsch 1983; Sugrue 1996; 1 Author 2008; Boustan 2016), and the sharply disparate racial impacts of deindustrialization (Wilson 1990), wage stagnation (Austin 2013), and mass-incarceration (Petit and Western 2004; Schneider and Turner 2015; Sykes and Marato 2016). For most Americans, home equity is the single most important component of family wealth (Federal Reserve 2016). African-Americans rely disproportionately on home equity as a source of wealth, and yet home ownership stands out—across this history—as an arena of sustained and pervasive racial discrimination (Squires 2007; Pager and Shepherd 2008; Rothstein 2017). Formal legal restrictions, including racial zoning ordinances and race-restrictive deed covenants, sharply constrained African-American housing opportunities in the first half of the twentieth century (Gonda 2015; Boustan 2016; Author 2008; Fox-Gotham 2002). As these instruments fell to “equal protection” legal challenges, they were replicated and reinvented by both private realty (Helper 1979) and public policies—including local zoning, and the now- infamous embrace of “redlining” by federal housing and mortgage programs (Rothstein 2017; Katznelson 2005; Greer 2013, Hillier 2003, Jackson 1980; Author 2008). African-Americans, as a result, have been substantially excluded from both opportunities for homeownership, and its benefits (Killewald and Bryan 2016). “Race and property” as Conley (1999, 5) underscores, “are intimately linked and form the nexus of black-white inequality.” While the role of housing segregation and discrimination in creating and sustaining the racial wealth gap is widely recognized (Oliver and Shapiro 2006; Conley 1999; Krivo and Kaufman 2004: Shapiro 2004), there is a gap in our understanding of this process, stemming from the temporal and spatial limits of national survey data on housing and family wealth. This data, available from the early 1980s, picks up the story only after a half-century of private and state-sponsored segregation, federal housing and mortgage policies, and dramatic demographic 2 change (black migration and white flight) had shaped African-American neighborhoods and African-American assets. And it offers only a national glimpse of a story shaped largely by local practices, patterns, and policies. In this paper, we examine the historical process of wealth accumulation through home equity for a sample of homeowners in St. Louis from 1940 to 2016. To do so, we draw on three resources: the newly-available full-count census for 1940 (Ruggles et al 2015); the archival records of the St. Louis Assessor’s Office; and a close historical understanding of local housing patterns and policies (Author 2008). We use our understanding of the St. Louis setting and the 1940 full count decennial census to draw a stratified sample of black and white homeowners; we use the Assessor’s records to assemble data on housing values, transactions, and tenure for the sample properties from 1940 through 2016. The result is a descriptive portrait of racial wealth inequality across this era – pointing to household and neighborhood processes that affect wealth accumulation through home equity for blacks and whites. We find stark and sustained racial segregation in local housing markets, short housing tenure and dynamic patterns of mobility for white homeowners to neighborhoods with increasing housing values, and long housing tenure for black owners in neighborhoods marked by disinvestment and declining home values. The consequence is a dramatic erosion of wealth and equity for the 1940 black owners and their heirs, contrasted with an accumulation of wealth and equity for the 1940 white owners. Racial Gaps in Wealth and Homeownership The racial wealth gap, as measured by the triennial Survey of Consumer Finances (SCF) and earlier surveys, has changed little over the last half-century. Median white wealth grew nearly 3 fourfold between 1962 and 2010 (Urban Institute 2017), before slipping during the Great Recession. The median wealth of black families, by contrast, is essentially flat across this era, peaking at just over 16 percent of white wealth at the end of the 1990s, falling back to barely half that in 2013, and settling in at just over 10% in the latest (2016) survey (Bricker et al 2017). This gap far exceeds the gap in median income (62 percent) or median wages (75 percent) (Census Historical Income Tables; Wilson and Rodgers 2016). Estimates based on other surveys echo these patterns.1 The racial wealth gap is shaped largely by patterns of inequality in housing, a fact attenuated by the fact that home equity makes up a much greater share of the wealth of black homeowners than of white homeowners (Oliver and Shapiro, 2006; Wolff and Gittleman 2004; Burds-Sharp and Rasch 2015). Indeed, for most lower-income households, assets other than home equity are rare, and often negative (Boehm and Schlottman 2008). Even as African- Americans rely heavily on home equity as a source of wealth, their access to homeownership has been constrained by an array of factors. The black homeownership rate has stubbornly trailed the white homeownership rate by about 25 points since 1900 (Collins and Margo 2011; Buist et al 1994), a gap that persists across the income spectrum (Horton and Thomas 1998; Jackman and Jackman 1980). Where black homeownership did gain a foothold, often in neighborhoods undergoing racial transition (Boustan and Margo 2013), home values slipped and the benefits of 1 We use the SCF series, with estimates for 1962 using the Survey of Financial Characteristics of Consumers 1962 and Survey of Changes in Family Finances 1963 (Urban Institute 2017). The Survey on Income and Program Participation (SIPP), a longitudinal panel survey of households, has included a supplemental survey on wealth since 1984 (Eggleston and Klee 2016). The Panel Study on Income Dynamics (PSID) has also collected detailed information on wealth since 1984. Scholars have used the SIPP and PSID for estimates of the net worth of demographic subgroups (Shapiro and Oliver 1996; Conley 1999; Altonji et al 2005), and for historical trends (Shapiro, Meschede, and Osoro 2013; Wolff and Gittleman 2004) that cover roughly the same chronological span of the SCF. 4 homeownership—as a tax deduction, as a hedge against inflation, as a source of forced savings— evaporated (Buist et al 1994; Kain and Quigley 1972; Parcel 1982). When black borrowers surmounted the high denial rates in private credit markets, they were saddled with higher interest and insurance rates (Chiteji 2010). Understanding Racial Inequality in Wealth and Home Equity To understand the mechanisms by which housing wealth is created (or destroyed), we need to trace black and white homeownership in their local contexts; in the settings where distinct patterns of housing segregation, residential development, and opportunities for