Page 1 of 114
Municipal Heritage Committee
Monday, February 5, 2018 6:30 PM Boardroom, Development and Engineering Services, 305 Barrie Street, Bradford
Revised Agenda
A meeting of the Heritage Committee of The Corporation of the Town of Bradford West Gwillimbury will be held Monday, February 5, 2018 at 6:30 PM, in the Boardroom, Development and Engineering Services, 305 Barrie Street, Bradford, ON. Pages 1. Call to Order The Chair calls the meeting to order.
2. Adoption of Agenda Recommendation: That the Committee Agenda dated February 5, 2018 be adopted as printed.
3. Declarations of Pecuniary Interest and the General Nature
4. Presentations/Deputations
5. Open Forum Members of the public who are in attendance are invited to address the Committee by signing the Open Forum Register.
6. Adoption of Minutes
4 - 7 6.1 Adoption of Minutes
Recommendation: That the minutes of the January 11, 2018 meeting be adopted as printed.
7. Correspondence
8 7.1 Bond Head Museum - 2875 Highway 27
Page 2 of 114 Heritage Committee - Agenda February 5, 2018
8. Request for Removal/Demolition - Reports
9 - 33 8.1 Report on 48 James Street demolition request
34 - 40 8.2 Report title 'So where was Sir William really born?'
41 - 73 8.3 Report on 2875 County Road 27 demolition request
9. Unfinished Business
9.1 Update on property standards with regard to heritage - Ian Cooper
9.2 Designation of Coulson’s Hill Church
9.3 Plaque Program
9.4 108 Moore Street Update
74 - 114 9.5 Newton Robinson Church Designation
9.6 Property at 4255 Line 6
9.7 Property at 4255 Line 6
9.8 Doors Open September 29th, 2018
Leisl McDill will provide the Committee with an update on the County's advertisement, main event imagine and deadlines following a meeting with Donna Goodwin on February 15th.
9.9 Street Names for Bond Head North - additional information on selected names is being requested by staff
10. Media Updates
11. New Business
11.1 Request to document the Auld Kirk 'Hitching Shed'
Page 3 of 114 Heritage Committee - Agenda February 5, 2018
12. Announcements
13. Next Meeting
13.1 Meeting Date - March 5th, 2018
13.2 Agenda items
14. Adjourn Recommendation: That the meeting is hereby adjourned at ______.
Page 4 of 114
Heritage Committee
Thursday, January 11, 2018 6:30 PM Boardroom, Development and Engineering Services, 305 Barrie Street, Bradford
Minutes
Members Present: Rob Keffer, Mayor Ian Cooper Ron Orr, Councillor Diane Milos Franz Aschwanden Lynda Usher Munawar Chudary Brenda Winter
Regrets: Jennifer de Winter
Staff: Leisl McDill, Committee Coordinator Brandon Slopack, Planner Alan Wiebe, Senior Planner Ryan Windle, Manager of Community Planning
Call to Order The Chair called the meeting to order at 6:34 p.m. Adoption of Agenda HC-2018-01 Milos/Usher That the Committee Agenda dated January 11, 2017 be adopted as printed. CARRIED. Declarations of Pecuniary Interest and the General Nature There were no declarations at this or any other time.
Presentations/Deputations There were no presentations or deputations. Open Forum David Chambers spoke to the Committee about various heritage reports.
Page 2 of 4 Page 5 of 114 Heritage Committee - Minutes January 11, 2018
Ryan Virtanen spoke on behalf of the owners of the property at 2875 County Road 27 and the history of the property. The Committee members and the property owners discussed history of the property.
Adoption of Minutes Adoption of Minutes HC-2018-02 Winter/Aschwanden That the minutes of the December 4, 2017 meeting be adopted as printed. CARRIED. Correspondence Community Heritage Ontario - Letter to the Chair, Bradford West Gwillimbury Heritage Committee
HC-2018-03 Aschwanden/Cooper That the Heritage Committee pass a recommendation in support of Report 10 of the House of Commons Standing Committee on Environment and Sustainable Development - Preserving Canada's Heritage: The Foundation for Tomorrow; and
That emphasis be placed on recommendation 11 of the report that addresses the establishment of a tax credit for the restoration and preservation of buildings on the Canadian Register of Historic Places; and
That the Heritage Committee recommend that Council pass a resolution in support of the report as well; and
That both resolutions be forwarded to the federal Minister of the Environment with copies going to the Minister of Finance and the local federal Member of Parliament. CARRIED. County accepting applications for its 2018 Arts, Culture and Heritage The Committee discussed community groups that may have projects that fit the criteria. Any interested group can contact Donna Goodwin at the County for information.
Request for Removal/Demolition - Subcommittee Reports 2875 County Road 27 Request for demolition Alan Wiebe spoke to the Committee regarding the development of this property. On January 23rd a Public Planning Meeting regarding this property will take place. The Committee discussed the need to have clear proof of the property's ownership history. The Subcommittee will conduct research and report back at the February meeting.
Page 3 of 4 Page 6 of 114 Heritage Committee - Minutes January 11, 2018
48 James Street Brandon Slopack spoke to the proposed redevelopment of this property which has requested a demolition permit. The Committee reviewed the property and existing street scape. The Sub Committee will report back at the February meeting.
Unfinished Business Doors Open September 29th, 2018 Bradford West Gwillimbury will take part in the Simcoe County Doors Open event on September 29th, 2018. The County will be paying the registration fee and will do large amounts of promotion for the event. The Committee will begin thinking about locations and try to find 3 to 4 site for the day.
Designation of Coulson’s Hill Church The Intent to Designation notice has been published and the by-law should move forward in February.
Plaque Program Brandon Slopack spoke to the Committee about the options for a plaque program. The Committee reviewed what content should be on the plaque, cost and design. The program will be finalized and recommended to Council in the next couple of months.
108 Moore Street Update Staff had no updates.
Newton Robinson Church Designation The Committee will review the report and discuss the findings at their February meeting.
Property at 4255 Line 6 Ian Cooper reviewed a report on the Cunningham house located at 4255 Line 6. Staff will continue to try and get in contact with the property owner.
Property at 3168 Line 10 Brandon Slopack noted that the property was formally known as 3568 Sideroad 10. A house has been demolished and a new house built already. This property was not included on the Heritage Register and therefore the Committee was not notified when the demolition permit was applied for.
Page 4 of 4 Page 7 of 114 Heritage Committee - Minutes January 11, 2018
Media Updates Lynda Usher noted that the Bradford Topic newspaper will publish heritage articles and she will work on having a few articles published before the end of the term. New Business Street Names for Bond Head North The Committee discussed potential street names for the new Bond Head developments. The Committee members discussed potential names and gave staff 3 or 4 suggestions.
Announcements Mayor Keffer announced that on Friday, February 16th a tribute to the Bradford Times will be held in the Zima Room from 7pm to 9pm. Mayor Keffer asked the Committee to give some thought to the upcoming hundred year anniversary of the 1819 Scotch Settlement. Next Meeting Meeting Date - February 5, 2018
Agenda items Adjourn HC-2018-04 Usher/Winter That the meeting is hereby adjourned at 8:56 p.m. CARRIED.
Ron Orr, Chair
Page 8 of 114
January 23, 2018
Dear Mayor Keffer and Council,
The Bond Head Women’s Institute has been in existence in Bond Head and surrounding area since 1904, and the members live their motto “For Home & Country”.
We are involved in many educational and rural projects. For example, in the last 6 years we have produced and sold 5 calendars which have highlighted, in photos and short histories, the “Vanishing Barns of Bradford West Gwillimbury”, and one calendar which celebrated important people and achievements for Canada’s 150th. We have had many interesting discussions about how our funds would be spent. The consensus was that we would put our finances and efforts into a museum for our community.
We are aware that Elsie Reynolds’s house (2875 Highway 27) is vacant and owned by a developer. We believe that this home could be transformed into an excellent museum. It is located in the heart of Bond Head and across from the Bond Head Community Centre, which would create an area for shared events.
In the early 1900’s, Mrs. Green and Mrs. Phillips started the Tweedsmuir Histories for our area, and both ladies lived in Bond Head. What a proud legacy they left for us, and it would be wonderful if we could preserve their work, and the history of many of our local citizens, including the celebrated Sir William Osler and Sir William Mulock, in a single beautiful space.
The home at 2875 Highway 27 is an integral part of the streetscape of a “Historical Bond Head” and would help to preserve the character of the hamlet.
Would you be so kind to forward this request to the company, who now owns the property. Together, in partnership with them, we could create a proud historical facility. We are convinced, moreover, that many other BWG organizations would join forces with us to make this project a success!
Sincerely yours,
Bond Head Women’s Institute
Page 9 of 114
` HERITAGE BUILDING EVALUATION WORKSHEET
HERITAGE BUILDING EVALUATION: IDENTIFICATION
Municipal Address: 48 James Street, Bradford, Ontario
Legal Description: roll 431201000311500 Lot: 15 Conc: VII
Building Name:
Inventory Identification:
Date of Construction: circa 1840-60 Additions to Building:
Original Use: Farm house Original Owner:
Current Use: detached single family dwelling Current Owner:
Current Zoning: residential Official Plan Designation:
Name of Recorder: Ian Cooper, Diane Milos, Lynda Usher
Date of Evaluation: January, 2018
Committee Review: Feb 4, 2018
Page 10 of 114
Fig 1. Simcoe interactive Map Image
Fig 2. Simcoe Interactive Map Satellite Image
Page 11 of 114
North elevation (main façade)
Page 12 of 114
West elevation of property
Page 13 of 114
East elevation of property Page 14 of 114
South elevation of property Page 15 of 114
Detail front facade
Page 16 of 114
HERITAGE BUILDING EVALUATION: ARCHITECTURAL DOCUMENTATION
Prepared By: Ian Cooper Date: January 18, 2018
Style of Building: The original house is a single detached, roughly rectangular (@28 x 60 ft), very early single storey cottage style house with medium pitched gable roof. The front façade faces north onto James Street and features asymmetrical windows and entrance. The house in situated to the north of a roughly 74.5 x 144.5 ft lot.
Design/Details/Craftsmanship:
None of the original architectural details are in evidence. The foundation where visible has been parged with cement. The fenestrations are all modern, the sheathing is modern vinyl or aluminium siding. There is an addition to the south of the main building that was probably not original but cannot itself be dated.
Architectural Integrity/Physical Condition: Other than the simple general form of the structure, all of the architectural attributes have been replaced including doors, windows and sheathing materials.
Design/Builder/Architect: The identity of the architect and/or builder is not known.
Interior Elements:
The inspection was limited to the exterior of the property only.
SUMMARY/COMMENTS ON ARCHITECTURAL SIGNIFICANCE:
Sadly, all of the architectural attributes that would have identified the building as being one of heritage interest have been replaced. That being the case, the building is no doubt quite old and associated with the early development of Bradford.
Page 17 of 114
HERITAGE BUILDING EVALUATION: ENVIRONMENTAL DOCUMENTATION
Prepared By: Ian Cooper Date: January, 2018
Design Compatibility with Streetscape/Environs: The property is bordered by an eclectic mixture including very early heritage buildings, Edwardian and craftsman style buildings from the turn of the century and the nineteen twenties as well as more modern buildings featuring styles from the late twentieth century.
James Street house Page 18 of 114
James Street house
James Street house Page 19 of 114
James Street houses
James Street houses Page 20 of 114
67 James Street ‘The Broughton House’
Community Context: The house was probably built in the 1840 to 1860’s range and no doubt would have been a wood frame structure with wooden sheathing. The street is characterized as being composed of predominately detached single family residences from its conception in the 1840’s until the present day. Landmark Status: The house is not considered a landmark.
Site:
The house is situated toward the north on a relatively large lot (for downtown Bradford) roughly rectangular plot in a southwest part of lot 15, concession VII. The property measures at greatest approximately 144.5 x 74.5 ft. The house is set back mere feet from the street.
Page 21 of 114
Site Sketch:
Simcoe County GIS image of 48 James Street
Page 22 of 114
HERITAGE BUILDING EVALUATION: HISTORICAL DOCUMENTATION
Prepared By: Ian Cooper Date: January, 2018 Date of Construction: 1840-60 Factual or Estimated: Estimated Sources: see references
Trends/Patterns/Themes: The building is notable for its association with the very early development of what would become the central core of the Town of Bradford. It is interesting to note how the southern portion of lot 15 originally largely owned by Letitia McGee, spinster was to become subdivided by speculators to provide lots for the development of what is now the historic core of Bradford. The lot was originally divided into ‘blocks’ each further divided into small parcels suitable for the construction of single dwellings.
1857 Survey Map of Bradford, Ontario Archives.
Page 23 of 114
Detail 1857 Map, ‘5’ indicates lot of 48 James Street
Page 24 of 114
Earliest Land Registry Title Abstract for S1/2 lot 15, Conc 7.
Page 25 of 114
Illustrated historical atlas of the county of York and the township of West Gwillimbury & town of Bradford In the county of Simcoe, Ont. Toronto: Miles and Co., 1878
Page 26 of 114
Detail from Miles and Company 1878 Map
Page 27 of 114
Detail Fred Collins Map of Bradford circa 1900
Events or Persons:
Unfortunately, the land registry abstract of title cannot be interpreted without the relevant ‘plans’ that are difficult to locate currently. alternately each individual instrument could be researched, however, time constraints do not allow such an investigation. Fred Collins Map of Bradford circa 1900 indicates he believed the property was owned by the Kilkenny family at this time. According to his map they had a furniture factory next door on the corner of James and Moore Streets with a showroom and later funeral parlour facing Holland Street. The map does not show any structure on the property circa 1900, however, this was probably an error as a later insurance map clearly shows the building located right at the eastern edge of lot ‘5’. Page 28 of 114
Advertisement Bradford Witness, 1882 Page 29 of 114
Goad’s Insurance Map of Bradford 1920’s
Archaeological Resources:
None.
Historic Grouping of Buildings: The building is one of many buildings on historic James Street.
Summary/Comments on Historical Significance:
The property is generally thought to be quite old, however at this time it is difficult to determine its age. We know that the Kilkenny family owned the property and understand that they were important early merchants and tradespersons in the community. However, because the building lacks any evidence of original architectural attributes, its historical significance is limited.
Historical Sources: Governor Simcoe Slept Here: The Legacy of Bradford West Gwillimbury Goad Insurance Map, Bradford Illustrated Historical Atlas of the County of York and the township of Bradford in the county of Simcoe, Ont. Toronto: Miles and Co., 1878. Inventory of Historic Buildings in Bradford, Ontario prepared by Gillian Haley and Nancy Smith, June 2000 Map of Bradford, 1857, Ontario Archives Map of Bradford circa 1900 by Fred Collins Simcoe Supplement in Illustrated Atlas of the Dominion of Canada. Toronto: H. Belden, 1881.
Page 30 of 114 HERITAGE BUILDING EVALUATION: SCORESHEET
Municipal Address: 48 James Street, Bradford Legal Description: Lot: Group: 3 Date of Evaluation: January 20, 2018 Name of Recorder: Diane Milos
HISTORICAL E G F P TOTAL
Date of Construction 30 20 10 0 30/30 Trends/Patterns/Themes 40 27 14 0 14/40 Events 15 10 5 0 0/15 Persons/Groups 15 10 5 0 0/15 Archaeological (Bonus) 10 7 3 0 Historic Grouping (Bonus) 10 7 3 0
HISTORICAL TOTAL 44/100
ARCHITECTURAL E G F P TOTAL
Design 20 13 7 0 0/20 Style 30 20 10 0 0/30 Architectural Integrity 20 13 7 0 7/20 Physical Condition 20 13 7 0 7/20 Design/Builder 10 7 3 0 0/10 Interior (Bonus) 10 7 3 0
ARCHITECTURAL TOTAL 14/100
ENVIRONMENTAL TOTAL
Design Compatibility 40 27 14 0 14/40 Community Context 20 13 7 0 0/20 Landmark 20 13 7 0 0/20 Site 20 13 7 0 20/20
ENVIRONMENTAL TOTAL 34/100
SCORE INDIVIDUAL OLD BWG
Historical Score X 40% = 44 X 20% = _8.8______Architectural Score X 40% = 14 X 35% = _4.9______Environmental Score X 20% = 34 X 45% = _15.3______
TOTAL SCORE 29.0
GROUP 1 = 70-100 GROUP 2 = 45-69 GROUP 3 = 44 or less Page 31 of 114
Municipal Address: 48 James Street Legal Description: Ont Vernacular 1840-60 Lot: Cons: Group: 3 Date of Evaluation: Jan 18, 2018 Name of Recorder: Lynda Usher
HISTORICAL E G F P TOTAL
Date of Construction 30 20 10 0 30/30 Trends/Patterns/Themes 40 27 14 0 14/40 Events 15 10 5 0 0/15 Persons/Groups 15 10 5 0/15 Archaeological (Bonus) 10 7 3 0 0/10 Historic Grouping (Bonus) 10 7 3 0 0/10
HISTORICAL TOTAL 44/100
ARCHITECTURAL E G F P TOTAL
Design 20 13 7 0 0/20 Style 30 20 10 0 0/30 Architectural Integrity 20 13 7 0 7/20 Physical Condition 20 13 7 0 7/20 Design/Builder 10 7 3 0 10/10 Interior (Bonus) 10 7 3 0 0 /10
ARCHITECTURAL TOTAL 14/100
ENVIRONMENTAL TOTAL
Design Compatibility 40 27 14 0 14/40 Community Context 20 13 7 0 0/20 Landmark 20 13 7 0 0/20 Site 20 13 7 0 20/20
ENVIRONMENTAL TOTAL 34/100
SCORE INDIVIDUAL OLD BWG
Historical Score X 40% = 44 X 20% = 8.8 Architectural Score X 40% = 14 X 35% = 4.9 Environmental Score X 20% = 34 X 45% = 15.3
Extensive add ons, no outstanding features 29.0 Page 32 of 114
Municipal Address: 48 James Street, Bradford, ON Legal Description: Lot: 15 Cons: VII Group: 3 Date of Evaluation: Jan 18, 2018 Name of Recorder: Ian Cooper
HISTORICAL E G F P TOTAL
Date of Construction 30 20 10 0 30/30 Trends/Patterns/Themes 40 27 14 0 27/40 Events 15 10 5 0 0/15 Persons/Groups 15 10 5 0 10/15
Archaeological (Bonus) 10 7 3 0 0 /10 Historic Grouping (Bonus) 10 7 3 0 3/10
HISTORICAL TOTAL 67/100
ARCHITECTURAL E G F P TOTAL
Design 20 13 7 0 0/20 Style 30 20 10 0 10/30 Architectural Integrity 20 13 7 0 0/20 Physical Condition 20 13 7 0 13/20 Design/Builder 10 7 3 0 0/10 Interior (Bonus) 10 7 3 0 0/10 ARCHITECTURAL TOTAL 23/100
ENVIRONMENTAL TOTAL
Design Compatibility 40 27 14 0 27/40 Community Context 20 13 7 0 13/20 Landmark 20 13 7 0 0/20 Site 20 13 7 0 0 /20
ENVIRONMENTAL TOTAL 40/100
SCORE INDIVIDUAL OLD BWG
Historical Score X 40% = 67 X 20% = __13.4_____ Architectural Score X 40% = 23 X 35% = _8.05______Environmental Score X 20% = 40 X 45% = _18.0______
TOTAL SCORE 39.45
Page 33 of 114
29.0 29.0 + 39.5 97.5
97.3/3= 32.5 = Group 3
The building classifications are as follows:
Group 1- those buildings of major significance and importance to the Town and worthy of designation under the Ontario Heritage Act.
Group 2 - those buildings of heritage significance and worthy of preservation.
Group 3 - those buildings considered to be of moderate significance and worthy of documentation or preservation if of a particular contextual value (e.g. part of a heritage streetscape).
Page 34 of 114
So where was Sir William really born? Ian Cooper
Page 35 of 114
Page 36 of 114
The image on the previous page is a copy of the instrument number 4467 of Bargain and Sale for 1 acre of property from John Southern to John Cawthra of Newmarket. Thomas Homan Mulock, William Mulock’s father, witnessed it.
A transcription of the survey measurements regarding the location of the land with modern units of measurement inserted is as follows: ‘…composed of part of the north half of lot one in the sixth concession in the said Township of West Gwillimbury and which said one acre of same is Butted and Bounded as may be att______as follows. That is today commencing on the northern limit of the said half lot at the distance of thirteen chains sixty four links and a half (900.57 ft) on a course south nine degrees thirty minutes East from the northwest angle of the said half lot. Then north seventy three degrees thirty minutes East two chains fifty links (165 ft). Then south nine degrees thirty minutes East four chains (264 ft) then south seventy three degrees thirty minutes West two chains fifty links (165 ft). Then north nine degrees thirty minutes West four chains (264 ft) to the place of beginning.
By using modern mapping software the following images were obtained outlining the approximate borders of the one acre lot.
Page 37 of 114
Page 38 of 114
Page 39 of 114
The acre is more or less over 2875 County Road 27 and 2865 County Road 27. Information from the Reynolds’s family indicates they had filled in an old well on the property and over the years discovered the foundations of an older building between the well and the street. They think that structure might have been where Sir William Mulock was born. Page 40 of 114
The land registry document shows instrument 4467 as a bargain and sale in July of 1843 of one acre from John Southern to John Cawthra for the amount of £20. The surrounding 15 ¼ acre had just previously been sold to John Manning Sr.
Instrument 7195 dated Dec 7, 1847 describes a sale of the one acre lot from John Cawthra of Whitchurch to Samuel Manning of Bond Head for £100. The five fold increase in the value of the acre within a 4 year period might mean that improvements to the acre in the form of a house was probably made. We know that William Mulock’s father Dr. Thomas H. Mulock died in 1847 and the his wife and children moved to Newmarket. John Manning Sr. later sells the surrounding 15 ¼ acre to Samuel.
Page 41 of 114
` HERITAGE BUILDING EVALUATION WORKSHEET
HERITAGE BUILDING EVALUATION: IDENTIFICATION
Municipal Address: 2875 Highway 27, Bradford, Ontario
Legal Description: roll 431202000111100 Lot: 1 Conc: VI
Building Name: Manning/Reynolds House
Inventory Identification: Manning/Reynolds House
Date of Construction: circa @1840 Additions to Building: brick addition east
Original Use: Farm house Original Owner: Samuel Manning
Current Use: single family home on @15 acres Current Owner: Mr. Muzammil Kodwavi
Current Zoning: residential Official Plan Designation:
Name of Recorder: Ian Cooper
Date of Evaluation: January 19, 2018
Committee Review: February 4, 2018 Page 42 of 114
Simcoe County GIS 2875 County road 27
Simcoe County Satellite Image of 2875 County Road 27 Page 43 of 114
Front façade, facing west
North elevation Page 44 of 114
South elevation
Southeast elevation Page 45 of 114
East elevation, possible kitchen addition
Front entrance detail Page 46 of 114
HERITAGE BUILDING EVALUATION: ARCHITECTURAL DOCUMENTATION
Prepared By: Ian Cooper Date: January 19. 2018
Style of Building: The original house is a single detached, roughly rectangular (27 x 21 ft), two story brick and wood building with a central entrance/hall arrangement with a central entrance flanked by two windows on the main elevation. There is a modest front porch that is approximately 12 x 6 ft. in area. The house appears to have a coursed rubble stone foundation and full basement. There is a single storey brick addition to the rear of the building (east) that is approximately 17 x 15 ft in area. The structure has a unique second floor composed of shingles as well as board and batten wood sheathing set back from the original brick sheathing material. There is a medium hip roof covered now with asphalt shingles. The house had a single modern cement block chimney stack located on northern exposure.
Design/Details/Craftsmanship:
The building is sheathed with a common running bond of masonry units (no headers) indicating the brick is a veneer over wood sheathed and wood frame building. The color, density and style of the bricks and mortar indicate a probable construction of the veneer at around the 1860-70 era.
Running brick bond without headers suggesting veneer
The windows on the main level appear to be very old two over two single hung sash with plain wood lug sills and segmentally arched lintels. Page 47 of 114
Main floor two over two sash window Page 48 of 114
Detail of plain lug wood sill
Front windowsill detail
The front door features a wooden panel door with top fenestration typical of those from the 1910-1920 period. Page 49 of 114
Front doo-r Page 50 of 114
The rear door is a wood frame and panel that might be original to the building.
Rear door
The foundation is coarse rubble stone and mortar allowing for a full depth basement level under the main portion of the house. The foundation of the rear addition appears to be less robust and not full depth compared to the main structure. There is evidence of considerable water infiltration and incorrect repair of mortar joints with cement possibly leading to subsistence problems. Page 51 of 114
Rubble corner stone Page 52 of 114
Rear addition
Issues with rear addition foundation, repairs with cement Page 53 of 114
The second floor and roof has a very unusual arrangement. The roof itself is a medium pitched gable roof, however, the setback of the second floor windows and flared lower second floor walls are reminiscent of a bell cast mansard roof.
Second floor
The second storey windows are symmetrical with the first floor windows though smaller on the main façade. The second floor windows on the second storey on the other sides of the building are not symmetrical and might have been added at a much later date, possibly to allow for ventilation in a bathroom.
Second detail level Page 54 of 114
Second level window and board and batten wood siding
Architectural Integrity/Physical Condition: The original building is maintains many of its original, though simple architectural features though there is evidence of foundation issues at the rear of the building.
Design/Builder/Architect: The identity of the architect and/or builder is not known.
Interior Elements:
The inspection was limited to the exterior of the property only.
SUMMARY/COMMENTS ON ARCHITECTURAL SIGNIFICANCE:
The house is an example of a fairly common style found in Bradford West Gwillimbury and is quite subdued as far as architectural details are concerned. That being the case, many of the architectural details are quite old and of the 1860-70 period. The second floor addition and remodeling is obviously not an original feature although it does appear to be quite old in of it appearing to date to sometime in the 1920’s. The owners of the property kindly supplied a digital image revealing the wall structure. It appears the brick is a veneer overtop of wood sheathing. Between the wood sheath and the outside of the joists there is riven lath and plaster, the joists and finally modern plaster. This coupled with the very modest footprint of the building indicate its original age as being closer to the 1840’s than the 1860’s. Page 55 of 114
HERITAGE BUILDING EVALUATION: ENVIRONMENTAL DOCUMENTATION
Prepared By: Ian Cooper Date: January 19, 2018
Design Compatibility with Streetscape/Environs: The property is bordered to the immediate north and south by modern homes, however, the streetscape as a whole is one of predominantly heritage buildings.
Simcoe County GIS Map red indicates modern buildings, blue indicates historic buildings
There the 20 properties on the west and east sides of highway 27 south of highway 88. Two are modern commercial type buildings and one is the community hall. Therefore of the 17 remaining residential houses, 14 are heritage houses and only 3 are of modern construction. It is quite obvious when one views the streetscape as a whole that it is the modern houses that seem somewhat anachronistic. Page 56 of 114
Property immediate north of 2875
Property immediately south of 2875
The following images illustrate the many heritage properties along highway 27, south of highway 88. Page 57 of 114
Page 58 of 114
Page 59 of 114
Page 60 of 114
2876 County Road 27, west side
2870 County Road 27, west side Page 61 of 114
2864 County Road 27, west side
2848 County Road 27 west side Page 62 of 114
2853 County Road east side
2843 County Road 27 east side Page 63 of 114
Community Context: It is important to restate the criteria for determining cultural heritage value or interest with respect to 3. ‘The property has contextual value because it, i is important in defining, maintaining or supporting the character of an area, ii is physically, functionally, visually or historically linked to its surroundings or iii is a landmark While far from a landmark, the houses unique appearance is well known and the house has considerable contextual value precisely because it does support the historic streetscape of this part of Bond Head and has been linked historically to the development of the area form John Sothern through the Manning family and up to the current time.
Landmark Status: The house has been and continues to be a very recognizable property easily seen when travelling through north or south along highway 27 through the hamlet of Bond Head
Site:
The house is situated toward the northwest on a large, roughly rectangular 15 ½ acre plot in part of lot 1, concession 6. The house is only 12 feet from the road and shares the acreage with several outbuildings including an old barn to the east. Page 64 of 114
HERITAGE BUILDING EVALUATION: HISTORICAL DOCUMENTATION
Prepared By: Ian Cooper Date: January 19, 2018 Date of Construction: 1840-60 Factual or Estimated: Estimated Sources: Please refer to references
Trends/Patterns/Themes: It is interesting to note how the northwest portion of lot 1, concession 6 was feverishly subdivided into small lots abutting the main roads of the day during the early development of the hamlet. # Date Grantor Grantee Description Dec 11 Crown William N ½ 100 acres 1823 Munshaw Y53 Dec 23 William William £100 N ½ 100 acres 33 1823 Munshaw Phillips 1914 June Gideon John Sothern £63 Part N ½ 17 acres 5/8 perch c+g+j+k+q 17 Phillips 1834 1938 Jan 17 Gideon Henry Carter £63 Part of said lot 18 acres 3 rd, 39 ¾ perches 1837 Phillips d+s+n 2756 Dec29 Gideon Joel Flesker £50 6 acres ‘f’ 1838 Phillips Robinson 3742 Aug 16 John William £500 Part of NW ¼ 16 ¼ acres 1841 Southern Carter 5143 Nov 1 William John £500 Part of N ½ 15 ¼ acres ‘c,q,r,k,pta’ 1842 Carter Southern 4466 Feb 6 John James £260 Same as 5143 1843 Sothern Manning Sr. of Tecumseh 9082 Mar 15 James Samuel £100 Part of N ½ 15 ¼ acres ‘c+r+q’ 1850 Manning Manning Sr. 622 Dec 15 Samuel Sarah Isabella 1$ love Part of N ½ ‘j,k,r,q and c’ 1880 Manning Manning, Spinster 6737 Mar 30 Sarah James Edgar $2000 N 15 ¼ acre acre 1922 Isabella Rose Grant Sharpe (formerly Manning) 6794 Dec 16 James Lillian and $2500 15 ¼ acre 1922 Edgar Rose James Craig Grant 6835 Apr 3 Lillian and Florence and Grant ? 15 ¼ acre 1923 Craig William James Joseph Hemphill 7096 Oct 1 Florence Ellen Jeffries $ 2500 15 ¼ acre 1925 and Grant William Joseph Hemphill 7557 Feb 28 Ellen William $2500 15 ¼ acres 1930 Jeffries George Grant Reynolds Page 65 of 114
Copy diagram abstract titles Simcoe land Registry Office #51
Events or Persons:
According to Governor Simcoe Slept Here The Legacy of West Gwillimbury ‘Samuel Manning (1871- 1891) was born in Old Castle , County Meath Ireland. He came to Canada in 1819 with his parents James and Isabella Manning, and his known siblings and they settled in Tecumseh Township. In the mid 1850’s he married Margaret Sutherland (about 1826-1877) of West Gwillimbury and they moved to lot 4, con. 6 (7). Their only daughter, Isabella, married Ingham N. Sharpe and moved to Toronto.
He was widowed in 1877 and later married Cassandra E.A. Sharpe, (born 1855) of King Township.’ Page 66 of 114
From the book A History of the Bond Head Area we have ‘Manning Hotel Also known as the Queen’s Hotel and the Bond Head hotel, was built by John Banting for Samuel Manning, on the South East corner of the crossroads about 1844, This hotel was totally destroyed in the fire of 1892 and was not rebuilt.
Samuel Manning House, Bond Head, BWG Library Local History Archives
Ad, BWG Library Local History Archives Page 67 of 114
From the title abstract we know that Samuel Manning’s father, James Manning Sr. purchased 15 ¼ acres ‘c,q,r,k,pta’ from John Southern on Feb 6, 1843 for the sum of £260. Then on Mar 15, 1850 James Manning Sr. sold 15 ¼ acres ‘c+r+q’ to his son Samuel Manning for £100.
Samuel and his wife Margaret lived on the property and likely were responsible for building the home. They had a single daughter named Isabelle after Samuel’s mother. During this period Samuel opened the Bond Head hotel, on the southeast corner of the cross roads perhaps on the land still owned by his father and designated as ‘a’ in the title abstract diagram. The family must have been prosperous because in 1861 they purchased the SW ¼ of lot 4 concession 7 (50 acres) from John Hammer of West Gwillimbury and built another, larger home.
Manning’s second house, lot 4 conc. 7
Sadly Margaret passed away in 1877 and at this point in time Samuel married his second wife Cassandra E. A. Sharpe from King. Samuel and Margaret’s only child, Isabelle was not married at Page 68 of 114
this time and on Dec 15, 1880 Samuel sells ‘Sarah Isabella Manning, Spinster’ the land ‘j,k,r,q and c’.
Copy of title Abstract Simcoe Count Land Registry Office 51, note price paid
Isabella eventually married Ingham N. Sharpe and moved to Toronto. Samuel died in 1891.
Bradford Witness Obituary, Bradford Library Digital Archives
Page 69 of 114
Samuels’ widow Cassie Manning eventually remarried and became Cassie Jeffery. She sold the property on lot 4 in 1920 to Richard Palmer from Toronto and retired to the Newmarket area. A couple of years later in 1922, Isabella Sharpe sold her 15 ¼ acres to James Edgar Rose.
It is interesting to note that the Manning family owned the property from the 1850’s until the early 1920’s, a period of approximately 70 years. During that period Samuel Manning and his wife Margaret and later Cassandra were very active and respected members of the community. In point of fact, during this period the local church was the First Canada Presbyterian Church build in 1837 on land donated to the church by Mr. Fraser who farmed the land. In 1853 the cemetery was enlarged and the ½ acre of land was given to the church by Samuel and Margaret Manning for ‘no consideration’.
Archaeological Resources:
None.
Historic Grouping of Buildings: Although the property was once a functioning farm with barn and outbuildings only part of the land is currently farmed and the outbuildings no longer used. The house itself is a significant part of a historic streetscape familiar to many local citizens as well as numerous travelers along the busy highway 27 corridor.
Summary/Comments on Historical Significance:
The property has moderate historic significance as being owned, built by and occupied by three generations of the Manning family during the early and formative years of the development of the hamlet of Bond Head from approximately 1850 to the early 1920’s. The family was important as one of the founding families in the Bond Head area.
Historical Sources: A History of the Bon Head Area, 175 Year, 1837-2012 by the Bond Head Historical Society Governor Simcoe Slept Here: The Legacy of Bradford West Gwillimbury Illustrated Historical Atlas of the County of York and the township of Bradford in the county of Simcoe, Ont. Toronto: Miles and Co., 1878. Documents and images from the local history room of the Bradford Public Library Simcoe Supplement in Illustrated Atlas of the Dominion of Canada. Toronto: H. Belden, 1881. Page 70 of 114
Municipal Address: 2875 Highway 27, Bradford Legal Description: Lot: 1 Cons: VI Group: 2 Date of Evaluation: Jan 19, 2018 Name of Recorder: Ian Cooper
HISTORICAL E G F P TOTAL
Date of Construction 30 20 10 0 30/30 Trends/Patterns/Themes 40 27 14 0 14/40 Events 15 10 5 0 0/15 Persons/Groups 15 10 5 0 10/15
Archaeological (Bonus) 7 3 0 0 0/10 Historic Grouping (Bonus) 10 7 3 0 0/10
HISTORICAL TOTAL 54/100
ARCHITECTURAL E G F P TOTAL
Design 20 13 7 0 7/20 Style 30 20 10 0 20/30 Architectural Integrity 20 13 7 0 20/20 Physical Condition 20 13 7 0 20/20 Design/Builder 10 7 3 0 0/10 Interior (Bonus) 10 7 3 0 0/10 ARCHITECTURAL TOTAL 67/100
ENVIRONMENTAL TOTAL
Design Compatibility 40 27 14 0 40/40 Community Context 20 13 7 0 20/20 Landmark 20 13 7 0 7/20 Site 20 13 7 0 13/20
ENVIRONMENTAL TOTAL 80/100
SCORE INDIVIDUAL OLD BOND HEAD
Historical Score X 40% = 54 X 20% = _10.8 Architectural Score X 40% = 67X 35% = _23.5 Environmental Score X 20% = 80 X 45% = 36.0
TOTAL SCORE 70.3
GROUP 1 = 70-100 GROUP 2 = 45-69 GROUP 3 = 44 or les Page 71 of 114
HERITAGE BUILDING EVALUATION: SCORESHEET
l\•lunicipalAddress: 2875 County Road 27 legal Desc.ription: lot: Group: 2 Date of Evaluation: January 21,201 8 Name of Recorder: Dia11e Milos
HISTOR ICAl E G F p TOTAL
Date of ConsmJction 30 20 10 0 30/30 Trends/PanemstThemes 40 17 14 0 27/40 Events 15 10 5 0 10115 PersonsfGroups 15 10 5 0 10115
Archaeological(Bonus) 10 7 3 0 3110 Historic Grouping(Bonus) 10 7 3 0 7110
HISTOR ICAl TOTAl 87/100
ARCHITECTURAl E G F p TOTAL
Design 20 13 7 0 13/20 Style 30 20 10 0 10/30 Archi£ecrurnl lntegrily 20 13 7 0 20120 Physical Condition 20 13 7 0 7/20 Design/Builder 10 7 3 0 OliO Interior (BomL ) 10 7 3 0 n/a ARCHITECTURAl TOTAl 50/100
ENVIRONMENTAl TOTAL
Design Compatibilily 40 17 14 0 27/40 Community Context 20 13 7 0 7120 Landmark 20 13 7 0 20120 Site 20 13 7 0 20120
ENVIRONMENTAl TOTAl 74/100
SCORE INDIVIDt:AL OLD BOND HEAD
HistoricalSc.ore X40% = 87X20%= -17.4 Archi£ecrurnlSc.ore X40%= 50X 35%= 17.5-- EnvironmemalSc.ore X20%= 74X 45% = _33.3--
TOTAl SCORE 68.1
fiR01 IP I = 70- 100 CiR01 IP? = 4'i.{;Q fiR01 IP "\ = 44 nr J po:. : Page 72 of 114
Address: 2875 County Road 27 Legal Description: 11/2 stone brick house Lot: Group: 1 Date of Evaluation: January 21, 2018 Name of Recorder: L Usher
HISTORICAL E G F P TOTAL
Date of Construction 30 20 10 0 30/30 Trends/Patterns/Themes 40 27 14 0 27/40 Events 15 10 5 0 10/15 Persons/Groups 15 10 5 0 10/15
Archaeological (Bonus) 10 7 3 0 3/10 Historic Grouping (Bonus) 10 7 3 0 7/10
HISTORICAL TOTAL 90/100
ARCHITECTURAL E G F P TOTAL
Design 20 13 7 0 13/20 Style 30 20 10 0 20/30 Architectural Integrity 20 13 7 0 20/20 Physical Condition 20 13 7 0 13/20 Design/Builder 10 7 3 0 0/10 Interior (Bonus) 10 7 3 0 n/a ARCHITECTURAL TOTAL stone foundation 66/100
ENVIRONMENTAL TOTAL
Design Compatibility 40 27 14 0 40/40 Community Context 20 13 7 0 7/20 Landmark 20 13 7 0 20/20 Site 20 13 7 0 20/20
ENVIRONMENTAL TOTAL streetscape surround houses over 100 years old 87/100
SCORE INDIVIDUAL OLD BOND HEAD
Historical Score X 40% = 90X 20% = _18 Architectural Score X 40% = 66X 35% = 23.1 Environmental Score X 20% = 87X 45% = 39.2
TOTAL SCORE 80.3
GROUP 1 = 70-100 GROUP 2 = 45-69 GROUP 3 = 44 or less Page 73 of 114
64.3 70.3 + 80.3 214.9
214.9/3= 71.6 = Group 1
The building classifications are as follows:
Group 1- those buildings of major significance and importance to the Town and worthy of designation under the Ontario Heritage Act.
Group 2 - those buildings of heritage significance and worthy of preservation.
Group 3 - those buildings considered to be of moderate significance and worthy of documentation or preservation if of a particular contextual value (e.g. part of a heritage streetscape). Page 74 of 114 Newton Robinson United Church Designation Report BWG Heritage Committee
Newton Robinson United Church
Designation report
1 Page 75 of 114 Newton Robinson United Church Designation Report BWG Heritage Committee
Table of Contents 1. Introduction 3
1.2 Property Location and Description 5
2. Background Research and Analysis 6 2.1 Design and Style 6 2.2 Site History 20 2.3 Context 35
3. Assessment of Value 36
4. Draft Statement of Cultural Heritage Value 38
5. Conclusion 40
6. Key Sources Consulted 41
2 Page 76 of 114 Newton Robinson United Church Designation Report BWG Heritage Committee
Newton Robinson United Church
1. Introduction This report has been prepared for the Town of Bradford West Gwillimbury with regards to the Newton Robinson United Church located at 4386 Line 10, in the hamlet of Newton Robinson. The church is included on the Municipal Registry of Heritage Properties as a listed property under the Ontario heritage act. The purpose of this report is to determine the cultural and heritage value of the property and to provide a recommendation as to elevating the property from being ‘listed’ on the Municipal Heritage Registry to being protected as a designated property under Part IV of the Ontario Heritage Act. The assessment of the site is based on Criteria for determining Cultural Heritage Value or Interest Ontario Reg 9/06, under the Ontario Heritage Act. The criteria for determining heritage and cultural value is based on a) architecture or design, b) historic associations and c) how the site contributes to its surrounding context. Findings: The Newton Robinson United Church is found to have considerable cultural heritage value related to its architecture, rich historic associations and contextual value and which merits designation under the Ontario Heritage Act. In terms of architecture it represents an excellent example of vernacular church design by a local, know builder. The structure has
3 Page 77 of 114 Newton Robinson United Church Designation Report BWG Heritage Committee undergone minimal alterations from its original design and maintains almost all of its original architectural attributes. The community has recognized the historic value of the site. The property is listed on the municipal Heritage registry under the Ontario Heritage Act. The church has significant historic associations with members of the community and served as a spiritual as well as social cornerstone for the hamlet of Newton Robinson as well as Bond Head. The cemetery remains the resting place for many of the original settlers of Newton Robinson. The original context of the church has remained virtually the same as it was since its construction in 1887. The church and cemetery is a highly visible and familiar landmark on the 10th line.
4 Page 78 of 114 Newton Robinson United Church Designation Report BWG Heritage Committee
1.2 Property Location and Description The building is a single storey vernacular brick church with surrounding cemetery located on a part of lot 24, concession 10, north of line 10 and west of highway 27. The municipal address is 4386 Line 10, Bradford.
Figure 1. Simcoe Interactive map location of church, the property is approximately 41 x 60 meters in area, with an adjoining 70 x 20 meter area to the north.
Figure 2. Google Satellite image of church and cemetery
5 Page 79 of 114 Newton Robinson United Church Designation Report BWG Heritage Committee
2. Background Research and Analysis 2.1 Design and Style Massing The church is a rectangular Therefore, the gothic revival single storey building set style features medieval gothic approximately 15 feet from line motifs many of which were 10. The church is oriented north purely decorative and served to south with the entrance facing no structural purpose contrary to line 10. The church features a what Pugin had first espoused. spire and is built in the picturesque gothic revival style popular for religious buildings during the 1860’s to about 1900. In the 1841 the English architect Augustus Pugin published his a book entitled The True Principles of Pointed or Christian Architecture. The volume encouraged a return to what was considered a Figure 3. Augustus Pugin ‘Christian’ style of architecture based on medieval cathedral Front entrance architecture. This was a response The front features a rectangular, to the prevalent neoclassical protruding vestibule with central architecture of the times based spire, raised central double on Greek and Roman doors flanked by two lower side architecture i.e., not on Christian doors. The side doors are in the architecture. gothic arch style while the
6 Page 80 of 114 Newton Robinson United Church Designation Report BWG Heritage Committee central main door is rectangular within a gothic arch opening the top apex of the arch in a simple, arch tracery pattern and containing etched glass. The doors are original, unusual and appear constructed of tongue in groove slats oriented at 45 degrees, housed within the door stiles and rails.
Figure 5. Entrance detail
Figure 6. Plaque detail Red as well as buff colored brick is used in a common bond pattern with headers every sixth Figure 4. Entrance course. Buff brick is used in the construction to highlight
7 Page 81 of 114 Newton Robinson United Church Designation Report BWG Heritage Committee numerous gothic design elements such as the foot and head courses, stopped, hooded window lintels and portions of the buttresses. The wooden steps leading to the front doors are of more modern construction but no doubt similar to the original steps. The remainder of the south entrance side features a impressive central spire flanked by two lancet shaped louvers, green copper roof and top stylized cross. The central spire Figure 7. Spire houses the entrance and is flanked by two lower, symmetrical storage areas complete with their own gothic arched doors. There is a dedication plaque visible above the main entrance.
Figure 8. Spire weathervane detail 8 Page 82 of 114 Newton Robinson United Church Designation Report BWG Heritage Committee
Elevations The east and west elevations are identical and are composed of red brick with dichromatic buff colored brick embellishments as seen on the window lintels, belt and roof course bricks and on the four buttresses. The church sides are symmetrical with respect to the Figure 9. East elevation placement of the buttresses and fenestrations. The full depth rubble stone foundation walls are clearly seen and each side is composed of four bays separated by five buttresses. Each bay features an arched lower basement window and lancet shaped upper window. Figure 10. West elevation
9 Page 83 of 114 Newton Robinson United Church Designation Report BWG Heritage Committee
Figure 11. Buttresses
Figure 13. Basement window
Figure 12. Buttress detail The church has a buff brick belt course immediately above the foundation stone. The north elevation has a single, central chimney stack (original) as well as a modern metal chimney associated with a more modern, concrete block addition.
Figure 14. North elevation
10 Page 84 of 114 Newton Robinson United Church Designation Report BWG Heritage Committee
Windows The two windows on the front The building windows all feature elevation are identical in a gothic arch design with the construction to those on the sides arch approaching a lancet in but lack the stopped detail on proportion. The windows are the lintel. original and have simple arched tracery made out of wood. Many of the windows are of double hung design allowing the lowermost portion to open. The windows on either side of the spire are double-hung lancet arches. Much of the glass appears to have an etched design, however, the central upper pane on the east and west sides Figure 15. Ventilation louvers on spire have panes of colored glass. The front right window has a leaded, stained glass design. The three windows above the entrance have an etched design. The lug sills are made of cut stone. The side windows all have distinctive lintels composed of buff soldier bricks. The lintels are in imitation of gothic stopped drip moulds. Figure 16. Lancet spire windows
11 Page 85 of 114 Newton Robinson United Church Designation Report BWG Heritage Committee
Figure 17. Front, right window
Figure 19. Side window, representative There are eight openings on the basement level. All are partially set into the stone foundations but six have the lintels set into the brick course. The east and west basement windows are in line with the larger gothic arch main windows and have a simple segmentally arched lintel composed of a
single soldier row of buff brick. Figure 18. Front, left window The windows appear of double hung sash construction allowing 12 Page 86 of 114 Newton Robinson United Church Designation Report BWG Heritage Committee for the windows to open. The building has a simple fixed, basement windows all have cut four-pane sash. stone sills.
Figure 22. North addition window
Figure 20. Basement window
Figure 21. Cut stone sill, detail The modern concrete block addition to the north of the 13 Page 87 of 114 Newton Robinson United Church Designation Report BWG Heritage Committee
Doors The front entrance is an arch design with the lower portion of the arch housing rectangular, unique, original, double wood doors. The doors are unusual for having panels constructed of tongue in groove boards laid in a 45-degree angle pattern. The doors are full through mortise and tenon construction pinned with dowels
The two additional doors on the entrance are single arch shaped Figure 23. Main entrance doors and constructed in an identical manner. These doors lead to storage areas on either side of the entrance. The doors all still utilize the original hinges as well as handles and latches. Modern locks have been added. A modern door is found on the east elevation in the rear addition.
Figure 24. Side door 14 Page 88 of 114 Newton Robinson United Church Designation Report BWG Heritage Committee
Figure 25. Door detail, pegged joints
Figure 27. Hinge
Figure 28. Door latch Figure 26. Front door handle 15 Page 89 of 114 Newton Robinson United Church Designation Report BWG Heritage Committee
Foundation in an imitation of cement block The church has a full basement construction. level with foundation construction out of local rubble stones.
Figure 30. Cement detail
Figure 29. West buttress, rubble-stone foundation
There is evidence that at some time in the past a cement covering was added over the stones and the cement imprinted
16 Page 90 of 114 Newton Robinson United Church Designation Report BWG Heritage Committee
Roof eaves are decorated with The main roof is a gable design brackets and corbels. with modern metal sheathing. The storage areas on either side of the spire have simple shed style roofs sheathed in metal. The roofs all feature projecting eaves with exposed rafters and purlins.
Figure 31. Shed roof eave
Figure 33. Spire roof
Figure 32. Gable roof eave
The top of the spire appears sheathed in copper plates. The Figure 34. Spire eave detail 17 Page 91 of 114 Newton Robinson United Church Designation Report BWG Heritage Committee
Historic condition and alterations The church maintains almost all of its original heritage attributes, however, there have been several changes since its construction in 1887. The most obvious change is the construction of the cement block Figure 36. Addition door, note monuments addition to the rear of the church. This addition has its own door and window and houses a heating unit. The original steps leading up to the entrance doors would originally have been wooden. Replacement steps are of concrete. Figure 37. Block detail While parts of the front wooden steps might be original (pillars), the frame is of relatively modern construction but probably is very similar if not identical to the original.
Figure 35. Addition
18 Page 92 of 114 Newton Robinson United Church Designation Report BWG Heritage Committee
Figure 38. Wooden steps
19 Page 93 of 114 Newton Robinson United Church Designation Report BWG Heritage Committee
2.2 Site History of the Township of West In 1836 John Latimer opened a Gwillimbury and Moses store on the Tecumseh side of Patterson of Tecumseh, the crossroads of line 10 and (Yeoman), Trustees of the what is now highway 27. In the Wesleyan Methodist Church in 1842 the store was sold and Canada and their successors, for Mr. Latimer built a hotel and a chapel and burying ground in the Township of Tecumseh…” tavern on the West Gwillimbury side. Therefore the hamlet was Eventually the log building was originally known as Latimer’s replaced with a wooden frame Corner. church in 1849. A Wesleyan chapel was built of According to Ms. Ellis “The logs in 1841 on Mr. Latimers church set a clear pattern for land on the Tecumseh side and the social and spiritual life of in 1842 two thirds of the the people. It supplied teaching, original one-acre was sold for preaching, admonishing and 37 pounds and ten shillings. comforting and provided According to Bernice Merrick opportunities for entertainment Ellis in her book Newton and excitement.” Robinson: a history of the United Church and the Community, 1841-1977. “The Indenture of Bargain and Sale, in the language of the deed, was between John Latimer, grantor and John Willoughby and Samuel Long
20 Page 94 of 114 Newton Robinson United Church Designation Report BWG Heritage Committee
honor of the legislative representative for the Simcoe region from 1830 to 1857, William Benjamin Robinson. In the 1870’s the ‘w’ was dropped and the town became know as Newton Robinson.
Figure 38. Compilation of West Gwillimbury and Tecumseh, 1881
The 17th annual report for 1841-42 of the Missionary Society of the Wesleyan Methodist Church in Canada says the itinerant traveling Figure 39. William Benjamin Robinson Ministers “are eminently 1797-1873 Traveling Preachers, oftener The Wesley New Town Robinson seen on horseback, each was the name of the branch in carrying with him his limited 1860-61 and further an wardrobe and his Bible, than in indenture of land in 1868 the study or in the parlours.” between “John Dickey of the In 1848 the post office first part and George Rogers, designate for the town was James Long and John Dickey named Newtown Robinson in and their successors as may be 21 Page 95 of 114 Newton Robinson United Church Designation Report BWG Heritage Committee appointed to hold the same report was for the year ending authority in the Methodist July 1, 1877. William Hill was church,” by which John Dickey recording secretary for the leased 50 feet of land circuit and there were five adjoining the east side of the congregations. These were north burial grounds for the Sutherland’s, Corbett’s, Black’s erection of a shed. This might (which may have been at explain the parcel of land Fisher’s Corner on the fifth side included under the property road of West Gwillimbury), description to the north of the Clarksville (next year to be current church and cemetery. called Beeton), Bond Head and Newtown. Newtown contributed $195.85. The Reverend D.F. Gee was the minister for the circuit with the Rev. James Wallace Stewart as assistant. J.R. Hipwell was Stewart and John Dickey and John Merrick Sr. were leaders.”
GEE, Daniel E.F. was born in 1840 in Canada and was received on trial as a Methodist Episcopal minister in 1864 at Markham, 1865 Brock, 1886 Prince Albert. 1867 Newcastle, 1867-1869 Stouffville, 1871 Markham (York Co.) 1878 official opening of church in Whitchurch Figure 41. Methodist history in Canada Figure 40. Map, Sarah Riley The following is a list of some of The following is from Newton the Ministers who served the Robinson: a history of the United Methodist circuit in the late Church and the Community, nineteenth century: 1841-1977 “ The second annual 22 Page 96 of 114 Newton Robinson United Church Designation Report BWG Heritage Committee
Rev. J.W. Totten was full to overflowing by 1886 Rev. S. Arkel with people and events. There were Sunday services, Sunday Rev. H.S. Matthews School, mid-week meetings, Rev. G. Langford special visiting evangelical Rev. Thomas Snowden bands, camp meetings and socials. Like the village and the Rev. N. Hill surrounding country, it was Rev. Thomas Leggett exhuberant, hard-working, self Rev. F. Campbell reliant and indigenous with a deep, sure faith. It was a Rev. D. Franks melding of Wesleyan Methodism and early country Canada at the peak of Victorian optimism and confidence.” The early Methodist congregations relied heavily upon the Leaders, men who were appointed by the minister and prominent members of the congregation. Their role was to
assist the faithful in the absence Figure 42. Rev. J.W.Totten, 1878-79 of the minister and attend to the The following is from Newton spiritual guidance by visiting the Robinson: a history of the United sick and dying, administered Church and the Community, discipline through counseling, 1841-1977 “The frame collect money and teach the Methodist church at Newtown scriptures. The following is a list
23 Page 97 of 114 Newton Robinson United Church Designation Report BWG Heritage Committee
of the Leaders in Newton Municipality : Robinson and it is these men who Community : Newton Robinson Street : were primarily responsible for Lot : the building of the new church: Concession : 0 Description : Son of a U.E. Loyalist from Pennsylvania, who John Dickey settled on Yonge St., in Newmarket. John moved to Newton Robinson (then Latimer's Corners), and established a John Merrick Sr. successful mill. Settled on being a carpenter in Newton George Windross Robinson. Married Julia Griggs, of England, on September 1, 1847.Survived by his widow, four sons, and two Thomas Lannan daughters. Age: 82 years, 10 months, 6 days. Interred in Newton Robinson. Obituary appeared in the August 13th Isaac Merrick edition. « James Bruce Figure 43. John Merrick Sr. Obituary notice, Bradford Witness Alfred Houghton John Robinson It is John Merrick Sr. who deserves special mention. He was awarded a “chair” by the church for 25 years service as a Leader. Additionally, it is John Merrick Sr. and his son Isaac, who operated the local planning mill as well as a sash and door factory.
Event Date : Monday, July 27, 1903 Event Type : Death 24 Page 98 of 114 Newton Robinson United Church Designation Report BWG Heritage Committee
Figure 44. George Windross, 3rd from building of a new church to left replace the wood frame one. In December the Trustees agreed to bring the subscription list to $3000.00 and to build a church not exceeding that amount. It was agreed that a few of the trustees (J. Merrick Sr., G. Figure 45. John Robinson, centre Rogers, C. Long) form a committee to view other churches
in nearby communities while the old church was to be sold for The following is from Newton $200.00. Robinson: a history of the United
Church and the Community, 1841-1977 Item. Nov 30, 1886: “We the undersigned to hereby severally agree to pay in three equal installments the sums set opposite our respective names for the erection of a new brick Methodist Church in the village of Newtown Robinson as follows. 1st payment to be Feb 1, 1887, 2nd. Nov. 1st, 1887, 3rd Nov 1st, 1888.” 45 individuals from the hamlet subscribed to raise $1900.00 towards the
25 Page 99 of 114 Newton Robinson United Church Designation Report BWG Heritage Committee
without the spire, for the sum of $2675, be accepted and to be completed on the 1st day of Oct. 1887.” Mr. Hanks, who worked in the sash and door factory, was to supply the pulpit. The spire was still a matter of discussion and eventually an additional sum of $50.00 was allocated for the building of the spire. Eventually, after the church was built it was decided Figure 46. Beeton World that the spire was still too small and an additional $75.00 was In Newton Robinson: a history of added to the tender with the the United Church and the women of the congregation Community, 1841-1977 “that responsible for raising the John Merrick Sr., and J. Merrick additional funds. Tin for the roof Jr., draw out a plan and was of the utmost importance as specifications for the church.” it was expected quality tin to Only one tender was received last at least 100 years. By and according to Newton August of the following year the Robinson: a history of the United furnishings and “chandeliers” Church and the Community, were purchased. 1841-1977 “that Isaac The new church was dedicated Merrick’s offer for building a on October 23, 1887. The brick church according to plans Beeton World stated in the and specifications as shown, press “The church is a handsome 26 Page 100 of 114 Newton Robinson United Church Designation Report BWG Heritage Committee structure of solid brick resting on holes in and disfiguring the a stone foundation. It measures walls.” 36 by 56 feet and has seating “The church proper looks accommodation for 350. Mr. remarkably well. It is finished John Merrick Sr. drew the throughout in grained oak; the designs and the building as side east’s are so arrange that completed by the contractor, every attendant faces the Mr. I.P. Merrick, is a credit to minister. Ample light is furnished both them and the place. The by the windows of figured glass basement is divided into one and four six-lamp chandeliers of large and two smaller rooms, of neat design supply the the latter one is designated as a illumination at night. The aisles committee room; the other is are carpeted and particular appropriated to the ladies for attention has been paid to use as a kitchen when tea secure the proper ventilation.” meetings occur. The main room is for a Sunday School. The walls The total cost of the building are lined with varnished ash according to Ms. Ellis was which has a warm and $3, 878.92. comfortable appearance. One of the Clare Bros. furnaces supplies the necessary heat and the basement ceiling is not plastered, the joists are left naked to allow all the heat possible to ascend to the body of the church. Not a particle of plaster has been used below stairs so that the children will be spared the trouble of punching 27 Page 101 of 114 Newton Robinson United Church Designation Report BWG Heritage Committee
Figure 47. Illustration form Beeton World, Dec., 1887
Figure 48. Church in 1908 It is important to remember that many of the members of the community donated hours of their time to the construction of the church. It was noted that many farmers donated a month of labor during the winter hauling stone, brick and wood over great distances.
28 Page 102 of 114 Newton Robinson United Church Designation Report BWG Heritage Committee
It is interesting to remember that Figure 50. Rich Hill Church, Tecumseh John Merrick Sr. was responsible for building the very similar appearing Presbyterian Church at Coulson’s Hill, the Rich hill church in Tecumseh and the home of Hon. Earl Rowe on the 10th line.
Figure 51. Earl Rowe home
Figure 49. Coulson’s Hill Presbyterian Church The church continued to form the spiritual and social centre of the community’s life throughout the late nineteenth century and well into the early twentieth century.
Figure 52. Home of Isaac Merrick, opposite church 29 Page 103 of 114 Newton Robinson United Church Designation Report BWG Heritage Committee
Figure 53. Excelsior Bible Class, 1916
Figure 54. Newton Robinson aerial view
30 Page 104 of 114 Newton Robinson United Church Designation Report BWG Heritage Committee
Figure 55. Newton Robinson Church circa 1930’s
Figure 56. Church, Mothers Day, 1966
31 Page 105 of 114 Newton Robinson United Church Designation Report BWG Heritage Committee
Figure 57. Newton Robinson circa 1970
In the 1920’s Methodist, Congressional and Presbyterian churches were seriously discussing the possibility of a union of the churches. The resulting amalgamation as The United Church of Canada saw legislation passed on June 27th, 1924 and the change became effective on June 10th, 1925.
The 1930’s saw hard times for rural Ontarians and many farmers had to borrow heavily to keep their farms going due to the low crop prices. Yet, or perhaps because of, these hard times the Newton Robinson United Church remained the central focus of the community with many special services, visiting speakers, picnics, ball games and concerts.
32 Page 106 of 114 Newton Robinson United Church Designation Report BWG Heritage Committee
The community celebrated the 50th anniversary of the church was on August 1st and 2nd, 1937. The church was renovated including a new roof as well as the introduction of electrical lighting.
The 1950’s and 60’s saw decreasing membership in all church denominations throughout Canada and as a result in 1966 the Presbytery notified the local minister, Rev. Dahlin that Tottenham, Bon Head and Newton Robinson become one charge – Newton Robinson church would close. Many in the community including the Hon. Earl Rowe, a life long member, Trustee and supporter of the church fought to have the small town church saved and they were successful. Eventually, it was decide that the Newton Robinson United Church be closed and services offered at the Bond Head United Church. The final service was held in January of 2014.
33 Page 107 of 114 Newton Robinson United Church Designation Report BWG Heritage Committee
Figure 58. Bradford Witness article March 30, 1977
34 Page 108 of 114
2.3 Context Church site The church is located approximately 15 ft from line 10 and is at the central, southern portion of its roughly 2/3 of an acre lot. The property is bordered on the north side by mature cedar trees and on the south side faces the 10th line. The church is bordered on all sides by historic buildings including the Tec -We -Gwill Women’s institute Hall to the immediate east. The immediate context of the church and the surrounding cemetery has remained the same since its inception in 1887.
35 Page 109 of 114 Newton Robinson United Church Designation Report BWG Heritage Committee
3. Assessment of Value The property is listed on the Municipal Heritage Registry. The property is not part of a Heritage Conservation District. The property was evaluated by the Bradford West Gwillimbury Municipal Heritage Committee using the Criteria For Determining Cultural Heritage Value or Interest from Ontario Reg. 9/06, under the Ontario Heritage Act. The findings are summarized in the following table.
36 Page 110 of 114 Newton Robinson United Church Designation Report BWG Heritage Committee
Value (quoted from Reg. 9/06) Assessment: Newton Robinson Church 1. The property has design value or physical value because it, The Newtown Robinson Church is an excellent i. is a rare, unique, representative or early example of a late nineteenth century vernacular example of a style, type, expression, material or place of worship in Bradford West Gwillimbury. construction method, The main components and architectural attributes ii. displays a high degree of craftsmanship or are predominately intact. artistic merit or, The interior has limited cultural value due to iii. demonstrates a high degree of technical or alterations. scientific achievement.
The church has had a long and important The property has historic value or associative spiritual as well as social association with the value because it, community and is recognized as having significant historic value. Previous ministers and i. has direct associations with a theme, event, members of the congregation were important to belief, person, activity, organization or institution the development of the community. that is significant to a community, The surrounding cemetery is also of value as the ii. yields or has potential to yield, information that gravesites, markers and monuments provide contributes to an understanding of a community or important insight into the lives and beliefs of the culture, or, community. iii. demonstrates or reflects the work or ideas of an architect, artist, builder, designer or theorist who is significant to the community.
The property has contextual value because it, The church is a prominent landmark of the area, clearly visible from both line 10 and highway i. is important in defining, maintaining or 27. The church is physically, visually and supporting the character of an area, historically linked to the area and especially to ii. is physically, functionally, visually or historically the surrounding cemetery. linked to its surroundings or, iii. is a landmark.
37 Page 111 of 114 Newton Robinson United Church Designation Report BWG Heritage Committee
4. Draft Statement of Cultural Heritage Value The Bradford West Gwillimbury Municipal Heritage Committee has prepared the following draft statement of Cultural Heritage Value and should the town elect to proceed with the designation process, staff and stakeholders should review this statement. Site Description The Newton Robinson United Church is located at 2528 Line 11, Bradford and is a single story brick building in the gothic revival style build in 1887 and in active use until the 1960’s. It is now inactive. The property is included in the Municipal Heritage Registry. Statement of Cultural Heritage Value or Interest The church has cultural heritage value due to its architectural style and design, its historic associations and its contextual value in contributing to its immediate context. The site is associated with the development of the hamlet of Newton Robinson as well as the development and ongoing evolution of Bond Head and surrounding area from the church’s original inception as a log structure in the 1840’s and continued as the current brick structure until the recent past. The church has significant architectural value, as an excellent example of vernacular church design by a well know local builder. The exterior maintains almost all of its original details. The cemetery is a good example of 19th and 20th century cemetery design and evolution. It is characterized by a naturalistic setting to comfort and attract the living, the creation of secure resting plots for the dead and the use of markers and monuments to perpetuate the memories of individuals of historic importance.
38 Page 112 of 114 Newton Robinson United Church Designation Report BWG Heritage Committee
The church has significant historical value as having served the spiritual and social needs of the community of Newton Robinson and Bond Head including many well-known early settler families important in the development of the community. The church contributes to its context as being the focal point of the surrounding cemetery sharing a prominent landmark at the intersections of the 10th line and highway 27. Description of Heritage Attributes General form and massing including vestibule and main building with gable roof and central spire Materials including dichromatic brick with belt and cornice courses, stone lintels, stone foundation The composition and features of the main, south entrance including vestibule with gothic arched doors, main entrance with double wooden doors within a gothic arch opening, original hardware, arched windows with wooden tracery, frames and stone sills, etched glass and the historic plaque The composition and features of the east and west elevations including gothic arched windows with wooden tracery and sills, etched glass on the main level and arched basement windows on the foundation level, prominent buttresses with dichromatic brick The setback of the building from line 10 The cemetery stone monuments, markers and mausoleum The trees to the north of the cemetery.
39 Page 113 of 114 Newton Robinson United Church Designation Report BWG Heritage Committee
5. Conclusion The Newton Robinson United Church is found to have significant cultural heritage value and merits designation under the Ontario Heritage Act.
Should designation proceed it is recommended that town staff and stakeholders review the draft Statement of Significance found in this report.
40 Page 114 of 114 Newton Robinson United Church Designation Report BWG Heritage Committee
6. Key Sources Consulted
Designating Heritage Properties A Guide to Municipal Designation of Individual Properties Under the Ontario heritage Act
Governor Simcoe Slept Here The Legacy of West Gwillimbury by The Bradford West Gwillimbury Local History Association
Hallowed Walls Church Architecture of Upper Canada by Marion MacRae and Anthony Adamson Clarke, Irwin and Company Limited, Toronto, Vancouver, 1975
Heritage Places of Worship A Guide to Conserving Heritage Places of Worship in Ontario Communities
Heritage Property Evaluation A Guide to Listing, Researching and Evaluating Cultural Heritage Properties in Ontario Communities
Illustrated Historic Atlas of the County of York, Township of West Gwillimbury and the town of Bradford in the County of Simcoe, Ontario. Mills and Co., Atlas
Illustrated Atlas of the County of Simcoe, 1881, H Belden and Co. Toronto
Newton Robinson: a history of the United Church and the Community, 1841-1977 by Ellis, Bernice Merrick, 1977
Our Stories, wwwourstoriesinnisfil.ca, Bradford West Gwillimbury Local History. WEGWHIST Collection
41