Ch 1-3 ALL W-Newch5-6 Fig&Tabs

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Ch 1-3 ALL W-Newch5-6 Fig&Tabs PUBLIC REVIEW DRAFT ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT/ REGULATORY IMPACT REVIEW/ REGULATORY FLEXIBILITY ANALYSIS for Amendments 65/65/12/7/8 to the BSAI Groundfish FMP (#65), GOA Groundfish FMP (#65), BSAI Crab FMP (#12), Scallop FMP (#7), and the Salmon FMP (#8) and regulatory amendments to provide Habitat Areas of Particular Concern January 2005 Lead Agency: North Pacific Fishery Management Council Anchorage, Alaska Responsible Official: Chris Oliver North Pacific Fishery Management Council Anchorage, Alaska For Further Information Contact: Cathy Coon North Pacific Fishery Management Council 605 West 4th, Suite 306 Anchorage, AK 99501-2252 (907) 271-2809 Abstract: This Environmental Assessment, Regulatory Impact Review, and Initial Regulatory Flexibility Analysis evaluates alternatives to designate and conserve Habitat Areas of Particular Concern. Habitat Areas of Particular Concern (HAPC) are site-specific areas of Essential Fish Habitat (EFH) of managed species. Identification of HAPCs provides focus for additional conservation efforts for those habitat sites that are ecologically important, sensitive to disturbance, exposed to development activities, or rare. This Environmental Assessment (EA) evaluates alternatives for designating HAPC sites in the Gulf of Alaska (GOA) and the Aleutian Islands (AI) and implementing associated fisheries management measures to provide additional conservation of specified HAPC areas. Three separate actions are considered in this EA: (1) HAPC designation and conservation of seamounts, (2) HAPC designation and conservation of hard coral areas in the GOA, and (3) HAPC designation and conservation of hard coral areas in the Aleutian Islands. (This page is blank) HAPC EA-RIR-IRFA ii Table of Contents EXECUTIVE SUMMARY.................................................................................................................xiii 1.0 PURPOSE AND NEED FOR ACTION.......................................................................................1 1.1 Introduction ..........................................................................................................................1 1.2 Purpose and Need for Action.................................................................................................2 1.2.1 Problem Statement ...................................................................................................2 1.2.2 Purpose of Action.....................................................................................................2 1.2.3 Need for Action........................................................................................................2 1.3 Decisions to Be Made and Proposed Schedule.......................................................................3 1.4 Organization of the EA .........................................................................................................3 2.0 ALTERNATIVES INCLUDING THE PROPOSED ACTION..................................................4 2.1 NEPA Guidance for Alternatives ..........................................................................................4 2.2 Background and Alternative Formulation..............................................................................4 2.2.1 Relationship to the Environmental Impact Statement for Essential Fish Habitat .....................................................................................................................4 2.2.2 Overview of Previous Actions to Identify HAPCs.....................................................4 2.2.3 Development of Alternatives for this Analysis ..........................................................8 2.2.4 Review Process Leading to Alternatives for Analysis................................................9 2.3 Background Descriptions of the Alternatives.........................................................................9 2.3.1 Action 1 – HAPCs for Seamounts in the EEZ ...........................................................9 2.3.2 Action 2 – HAPCs for GOA (GOA) corals .............................................................10 2.3.3 Action 3 – HAPCs for Aleutian Island (AI) corals ..................................................10 3.0 AFFECTED ENVIRONMENT .................................................................................................35 3.1 Affected Environment at the Proposed HAPC Sites.............................................................35 3.1.1 Named Seamounts HAPC Sites ..............................................................................35 3.1.2 Biological Environment and Habitat Usage of Species............................................37 3.1.3 GOA HAPC Sites...................................................................................................39 3.1.4 Aleutian Island HAPC Sites....................................................................................41 3.1.5 Biological Environmental and Habitat Usage of Species .........................................43 3.2 Effects of Fishing Activities on Fish Habitat .......................................................................43 3.2.1 Non-pelagic Otter Trawls .......................................................................................44 3.2.2 Pelagic Trawls........................................................................................................48 3.2.3 Scallop Dredges .....................................................................................................50 3.2.4 Longlines ...............................................................................................................52 3.2.5 Pot Gear .................................................................................................................54 3.2.6 Troll Gear...............................................................................................................56 3.3 Effects of Non-fishing Activities on Fish Habitat ................................................................57 3.4 Regulatory Environment .....................................................................................................57 3.4.1 National Environmental Policy Act.........................................................................57 3.4.2 Magnuson-Stevens Fishery Conservation and Management Act..............................58 3.4.3 Regulatory Flexibility Act ......................................................................................59 3.4.4 Executive Order 12866...........................................................................................60 4.0 ENVIRONMENTAL CONSEQUENCES OF THE ALTERNATIVES...................................62 4.1 Background, Significance Analysis and Criteria for Proposed HAPCs.................................62 4.1.1 Effects on Habitat...................................................................................................63 4.1.2 Effects on Target Species .......................................................................................65 4.1.3 Economic and Socioeconomic Aspects of Federally-Managed Fisheries .................67 4.1.4 Effects on Other Fisheries.......................................................................................68 HAPC EA-RIR-IRFA iii 4.1.5 Effects on State of Alaska-Managed State Waters and Parallel Fisheries for Groundfish Species.................................................................................................72 4.1.6 Protected Species....................................................................................................73 4.1.7 Effects on the Ecosystem........................................................................................76 4.1.8 Effects on Non-fishing Activities............................................................................78 4.2 Consequences of HAPCs for Seamounts .............................................................................79 4.2.1 Effects on Habitat...................................................................................................79 4.2.2 Effects on Target Species .......................................................................................82 4.2.3 Effects on Economic and Socioeconomic Aspects of Federally Managed Fisheries .................................................................................................................83 4.2.4 Effects on Other Fisheries.......................................................................................83 4.2.5 Effects on Protected Species ...................................................................................85 4.2.6 Effects on Ecosystem .............................................................................................86 4.2.7 Effects on Non-fishing Activities............................................................................86 4.2.8 Summary of the Effects of the Alternatives under Action 1.....................................87 4.3 Consequences of HAPCs for GOA Corals...........................................................................87 4.3.1 Effects on Habitat...................................................................................................87 4.3.2 Effects on Target Species .......................................................................................91 4.3.3 Effects on Economic and Socioeconomic Aspects of Federally Managed Fisheries .................................................................................................................92 4.3.4 Effects
Recommended publications
  • Biological Monitoring in the Central Aleutian Islands, Alaska in 2009-2015
    AMNWR 2015/16 BIOLOGICAL MONITORING IN THE CENTRAL ALEUTIAN ISLANDS, ALASKA IN 2009-2015 Brie A. Drummond and Jeffrey C. Williams Key words: Alaska, Aleutian Islands, black-legged kittiwake, common murre, fork-tailed storm-petrel, Kasatochi Island, Koniuji Island, Leach's storm-petrel, Oceanodroma furcata, Oceanodroma leucorhoa, pelagic cormorant, Phalacrocorax pelagicus, Phalacrocorax urile, populations, productivity, red-faced cormorant, red-legged kittiwake, reproductive performance, Rissa brevirostris, Rissa tridactyla, thick-billed murre, Ulak Island, Uria aalge, Uria lomvia U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service Alaska Maritime National Wildlife Refuge 95 Sterling Highway, Suite 1 Homer, Alaska 99603 December 2015 Cite as: Drummond, B. A. and J. C. Williams. 2015. Biological monitoring in the central Aleutian Islands, Alaska in 2009-2015. U.S. Fish and Wildl. Serv. Rep., AMNWR 2015/16. Homer, Alaska. Ulak Island from the ridge above the storm-petrel plot. TABLE OF CONTENTS Page INTRODUCTION ........................................................................................................................................... 1 STUDY AREA ............................................................................................................................................... 2 METHODS .................................................................................................................................................... 3 ACKNOWLEDGMENTS ...............................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Adak Army Base and Adak Naval Operating Base and Or Common Adak Naval Station (Naval Air Station Adak) 2
    N?S Ferm 10-900 OMB Mo. 1024-0018 (342) NHL - WWM, PACIFIC Eip. 10-31-84 Uncled States Department off the Interior National Park Service For NPS UM only National Register off Historic Places received Inventory Nomination Form date entered See instructions in How to Complete National Register Forms Type all entries complete applicable sections ' _______ 1. Name__________________ historic Adak Army Base and Adak Naval Operating Base and or common Adak Naval Station (Naval Air Station Adak) 2. Location street & number not (or publication city, town vicinity of state Alaska code 02 county Aleutian Islands code 010 3. Classification Category Ownership Status Present Use __ district X public __ occupied __ agriculture __ museum building(s) private __ unoccupied commercial park structure both work in progress educational private residence X site Public Acquisition Accessible entertainment religious object in process X yes: restricted government __ scientific being considered .. yes: unrestricted industrial transportation __ no ,_X military __ other: 4. Owner off Property name United States Navy street & number Adak Naval Station, U.S. Department of the Navy city, town FPO Seattle vicinity of state Washington 98791 5. Location off Legal Description courthouse, registry of deeds, etc. United States Navy street & number Adak Naval Station. U.S. Department of the Navy city, town FPO Seattle state Washington 98791 6. Representation in Existing Surveys y title None has this property been determined eligible? yes J^L no date federal _ _ state __ county local depository for survey records city, town state 7. Description Condition Check one Check one __ excellent __ deteriorated __ unaltered _K original site __ good X_ ruins _X altered __ moved date _.__._.
    [Show full text]
  • Aleutian Islands
    Journal of Global Change Data & Discovery. 2018, 2(1): 109-114 © 2018 GCdataPR DOI:10.3974/geodp.2018.01.18 Global Change Research Data Publishing & Repository www.geodoi.ac.cn Global Change Data Encyclopedia Aleutian Islands Liu, C.1* Yang, A. Q.2 Hu, W. Y.1 Liu, R. G.1 Shi, R. X.1 1. Institute of Geographic Sciences and Natural Resources Research, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100101, China; 2. Institute of Remote Sensing and Digital Earth,Chinese Academy of Sciences,Beijing100101,China Keywords: Aleutian Islands; Fox Islands; Four Mountains Islands; Andreanof Islands; Rat Islands; Near Islands; Kommandor Islands; Unimak Island; USA; Russia; data encyclopedia The Aleutian Islands extends latitude from 51°12′35″N to 55°22′14″N and longitude about 32 degrees from 165°45′10″E to 162°21′10″W, it is a chain volcanic islands belonging to both the United States and Russia[1–3] (Figure 1, 2). The islands are formed in the northern part of the Pacific Ring of Fire. They form part of the Aleutian Arc in the Northern Pacific Ocean, extending about 1,900 km westward from the Alaska Peninsula to- ward the Kamchatka Peninsula in Russia, Figure 1 Dataset of Aleutian Islands in .kmz format and mark a dividing line between the Ber- ing Sea to the north and the Pacific Ocean to the south. The islands comprise 6 groups of islands (east to west): the Fox Islands[4–5], islands of Four Mountains[6–7], Andreanof Islands[8–9], Rat Islands[10–11], Near Is- lands[12–13] and Kommandor Islands[14–15].
    [Show full text]
  • Harbor Seal Population Decline in the Aleutian Archipelago
    MARINE MAMMAL SCIENCE, 24(4): 845–863 (October 2008) C 2008 by the Society for Marine Mammalogy DOI: 10.1111/j.1748-7692.2008.00225.x Harbor seal population decline in the Aleutian Archipelago ROBERT J. SMALL Alaska Department of Fish and Game, Division of Wildlife Conservation, 1255 West 8th Street, Juneau, Alaska 99811, U.S.A. E-mail: [email protected] PETER L. BOVENG National Marine Mammal Laboratory, NOAA/Alaska Fisheries Science Center, 7600 Sand Point Way NE, Seattle, Washington 98115, U.S.A. G. VERNON BYRD U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, Alaska Maritime National Wildlife Refuge, 95 Sterling Hwy, Homer, Alaska 99603, U.S.A. DAVID E. WITHROW National Marine Mammal Laboratory, NOAA/Alaska Fisheries Science Center, 7600 Sand Point Way NE, Seattle, Washington 98115, U.S.A. ABSTRACT Populations of Steller sea lions, northern fur seals, and northern sea otters declined substantially during recent decades in the Bering Sea and Aleutian Islands region, yet the population status of harbor seals has not been assessed adequately. We de- termined that counts obtained during skiff-based surveys conducted in 1977–1982 represent the earliest estimate of harbor seal abundance throughout the Aleutian Islands. By comparing counts from 106 islands surveyed in 1977–1982 (8,601 seals) with counts from the same islands during a 1999 aerial survey (2,859 seals), we observed a 67% decline over the ∼20-yr period. Regionally, the largest decline of 86% was in the western Aleutians (n = 7 islands), followed by 66% in the central Aleutians (n = 64 islands), and 45% in the eastern Aleutians (n = 35 islands).
    [Show full text]
  • Grea3tfpermhl RESOURCES of the ALEUTIAN ARC
    GrEa3TFPERMhL RESOURCES OF THE ALEUTIAN ARC Wy Roman .I. Mntylcw, RlairB~yA. Lics, Chri~',Boph~r.I. WYC, and Mary A. Moomnsa GEOTHERMAL RESOURCES OF THE ALEUTIAN ARC By Roman J. Motyka, Shirley A. Liss, Christopher J. Nye, and Mary A. Moorman Roman Motyka sampling an upper Glacier Valley hot spring in the Makushin geothermal area. Photo by Shirley Liss. Professional Report 114 Division of Geological & Geophysical Surveys Cover photo: "Old Faithful" of the Geyser Bight geothermal resource area. When- ever it has been observed (1870, 1948, 1980, and 1988),spring G8, Fairbanks, Alaska shown here at maximum activity, has had an eruption cycle of 1993 12 minutes. Photo by Shirley Liss. STATE OF ALASKA Walter J. Hickel, Governor DEPARTMENT OF NATURAL RESOURCES Harry A. Noah, Commissioner DIVISION OF GEOLOGICAL & GEOPHYSICAL SURVEYS Thomas E. Smith, State Geologist Division of Geological & GeophysicalSurveys publications can be inspected at the following locations. Address mail orders to the Fairbanks office. Alaska Division of Geological University of Alaska Anchorage Library & Geophysical Surveys 321 1 Providence Drive 794 University Avenue, Suite 200 Anchorage, Alaska 99508 Fairbanks, Alaska 99709-3645 Elmer E. Rasmuson Library Alaska Resource Library University of Alaska Fairbanks 222 W. 7th Avenue Fairbanks, Alaska 99775-1005 Anchorage, Alaska 995 13-7589 Alaska State Library State Office Building, 8th moor 333 Willoughby Avenue Juneau, Alaska 9981 1-0571 This publication released by the Division of Geological & Geophysical Surveys, was
    [Show full text]
  • Geographic Names
    GEOGRAPHIC NAMES CORRECT ORTHOGRAPHY OF GEOGRAPHIC NAMES ? REVISED TO JANUARY, 1911 WASHINGTON GOVERNMENT PRINTING OFFICE 1911 PREPARED FOR USE IN THE GOVERNMENT PRINTING OFFICE BY THE UNITED STATES GEOGRAPHIC BOARD WASHINGTON, D. C, JANUARY, 1911 ) CORRECT ORTHOGRAPHY OF GEOGRAPHIC NAMES. The following list of geographic names includes all decisions on spelling rendered by the United States Geographic Board to and including December 7, 1910. Adopted forms are shown by bold-face type, rejected forms by italic, and revisions of previous decisions by an asterisk (*). Aalplaus ; see Alplaus. Acoma; township, McLeod County, Minn. Abagadasset; point, Kennebec River, Saga- (Not Aconia.) dahoc County, Me. (Not Abagadusset. AQores ; see Azores. Abatan; river, southwest part of Bohol, Acquasco; see Aquaseo. discharging into Maribojoc Bay. (Not Acquia; see Aquia. Abalan nor Abalon.) Acworth; railroad station and town, Cobb Aberjona; river, IVIiddlesex County, Mass. County, Ga. (Not Ackworth.) (Not Abbajona.) Adam; island, Chesapeake Bay, Dorchester Abino; point, in Canada, near east end of County, Md. (Not Adam's nor Adams.) Lake Erie. (Not Abineau nor Albino.) Adams; creek, Chatham County, Ga. (Not Aboite; railroad station, Allen County, Adams's.) Ind. (Not Aboit.) Adams; township. Warren County, Ind. AJjoo-shehr ; see Bushire. (Not J. Q. Adams.) Abookeer; AhouJcir; see Abukir. Adam's Creek; see Cunningham. Ahou Hamad; see Abu Hamed. Adams Fall; ledge in New Haven Harbor, Fall.) Abram ; creek in Grant and Mineral Coun- Conn. (Not Adam's ties, W. Va. (Not Abraham.) Adel; see Somali. Abram; see Shimmo. Adelina; town, Calvert County, Md. (Not Abruad ; see Riad. Adalina.) Absaroka; range of mountains in and near Aderhold; ferry over Chattahoochee River, Yellowstone National Park.
    [Show full text]
  • Geologic Map of Alaska
    Geologic Map of Alaska Compiled by Frederic H. Wilson, Chad P. Hults, Charles G. Mull, and Susan M. Karl Pamphlet to accompany Scientific Investigations Map 3340 2015 U.S. Department of the Interior U.S. Geological Survey Front cover. Color shaded relief map of Alaska and surroundings. Sources: 100-meter-resolution natural image of Alaska, http://nationalmap.gov/small_scale/mld/nate100.html; rivers and lakes dataset, http://www.asgdc.state.ak.us/; bathymetry and topography of Russia and Canada, https://www.ngdc.noaa.gov/mgg/global/global.html. Back cover. Previous geologic maps of Alaska: 1906—Brooks, A.H., Abbe, Cleveland, Jr., and Goode, R.U., 1906, The geography and geology of Alaska; a summary of existing knowledge, with a section on climate, and a topographic map and description thereof: U.S. Geological Survey Professional Paper 45, 327 p., 1 sheet. 1939—Smith, P.S., 1939, Areal geology of Alaska: U.S. Geological Survey Professional Paper 192, 100 p., 18 plates. 1957—Dutro, J.T., Jr., and Payne, T.G., 1957, Geologic map of Alaska: U.S. Geological Survey, scale 1:2,500,000. 1980—Beikman, H.M., 1980, Geologic map of Alaska: U.S. Geological Survey Special Map, scale 1:2,500,000, 2 sheets. Geologic Map of Alaska Compiled by Frederic H. Wilson, Chad P. Hults, Charles G. Mull, and Susan M. Karl Pamphlet to accompany Scientific Investigations Map 3340 2015 U.S. Department of the Interior U.S. Geological Survey U.S. Department of the Interior SALLY JEWELL, Secretary U.S. Geological Survey Suzette M. Kimball, Director U.S.
    [Show full text]
  • N Ear Islands
    Attu Island N e a r I s l a n d Alaid Is. s Nizki Is. The State of Alaska makes no expressed or implied warranties (including warranties of merchantability and Agattu Island fitness) with respect to the character, function, or capabilities of this product or its appropriateness for any user’s purposes. In no event will the State of Alaska be liable for any incidental, indirect, special, consequential or other damages suffered by the user or any other person or entity whether from use of the product, any failure thereof or otherwise, and in no event will the State of Alaska’s liability to you or anyone else exceed the fee paid for the product. State Patented, Tentatively Approved or National Wildlife Refuges 1 Other State Acquired Lands (Land Administration System, December 2000) National Park System State Wildlife, Park, Forest, and Other Multiple Use Areas National Forests and Monuments & National Recreation and Conservation State Selected Areas (ANILCA Topfilings included) National Wild & Scenic Rivers (Land Administration System, December 2000) Outside National Park System and * State Marine Parks Outside National Wildlife Refuges Buldir Island National Petroleum Reserve - Alaska (NPRA) Major Military Bureau of Land Management ANCSA Patented or Interim Conveyed Public Lands (Bureau of Land Management, December 2000) Both State and ANCSA Lands are Located Within a Section Municipal or Other Private Parcels (Bureau of Land Management, December 2000) ANCSA Selected (Land Administration System, December 2000) (Bureau of Land Management,
    [Show full text]
  • PROPERN of Fairbanks, AK 99709 DGGS LIBRARY Open File Repod 98-582 Icpbs
    EUSGS science tor a changing- - world DEPARTMENT OF THE iMTEIWlOR U.S. GEBLOGIICAL SURVEY I I CATALOG OF THE HISTORICALLY ACTIVE VOLCANOES OF ALASKA T.P. Miller I, R.G. McGirnsey l, D.W.Richter I, J.R. Riehle $ CC.J.Nye 2, M.E. \daunt l, and J.A. Durnoufin lU.S, Wlogieal Suwey Anehwage, AK 99508 2AlaskoDivisWl of Gedoglcaland Geophysicol Surveys PROPERN OF Fairbanks, AK 99709 DGGS LIBRARY Open File Repod 98-582 IcPBS Done in cooperation with the lnternaticnai Association of Volcanology and Chemistry of the Earth's Interior (IAVCEI) and the Catalog of Active Volcanoes of the W~rld(CAVW) Project This repart is preliminary and has not been reviewed for conformity with U.S. Geological Survey editorial standards (or with the North American Stsatigraphlc Code). Any use of trade. product or firm names is for I I descriptive purposes only and does not imply endorsement by the U.S. Government. Wew 10 t/7c west across the s~lrnrnircaldera of Mr. U+angell. The Eusf Crarer (foreground),North Crater (steaming)atld Ukst Crater (le~?)arc on the rim of rhe 4x6 krn cllldem. Mr. Dnrm is in the right background. Phoro by R.J. Motyka. Introduction ..........................................................................................................................................................................i Previous work .......................................................................................................................................................................ii Methodology ........................................................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Distribution and Population Status of Whiskered Auklet in the Aleutian Islands, Alaska
    DISTRIBUTION AND POPULATION STATUS OF WHISKERED AUKLET IN THE ALEUTIAN ISLANDS, ALASKA G. VERNON BYRD, Hawaiian Islands NWR, P.O. Box 87, Kilauea, Kauai, Hawaii 96754 DANIEL D. GIBSON, Universityof AlaskaMuseum, Fairbanks, Alaska 99701 The little known WhiskeredAuklet (Aethiapygrnaea) occurs only in the Aleutian(Figure 1), Commanderand Kurilislands of the North Pacific. In the Aleutian Islands it occurs from Unimak Pass to the Near Islands (Kesseland Gibson 1978), but the only documented nesting records are from Umnak Island (R.J. Gordon in litt.), Chagulak Island (Murie 1959), Atka Island (Turner 1886), and Buldir Island (Knudtsonand Byrd in press). This paper summarizesnew informationon the distributionof WhiskeredAuklet in the AleutianIslands, and providesa significantly higher estimateof the minimum population. METHODS Duringthe period 1972-1974 we were aboardthe R/V Aleutian Tern as it traveledto everymajor island in the Aleutians.In 1972 and 1974 nearlythe entireisland chain was traversed. In 1972 the trip was made during the breedingseason, but in 1974 observations were made in April, prior to nesting.In 1973 observationswere con- fined to the eastern Aleutians. Travel was generally confined to daylighthours so that continuousobservations could be made. One or two observerscounted birds within approximately 300 m of both sidesof the ship. The Aleutian Tern traveledat 16 km/h except when near islandswhen the speedwas reduced to as low as 8 km/h. Islandgroups within the Aleutiansare identifiedas follows:1) Fox Islands - Unimak Pass to Umnak Island (the area of each island groupends 16 km westof the westernmostisland, to includebirds associatedwith nestingcolonies); 2) Islandsof Four Mountains- Um- nak Island to Amukta Island; 3) Andreanor Islands- Amukta Island to UnalgaIsland; 4) Rat Islands- UnalgaIsland to BuldirIsland; 5) Near Islands - Buldir Island to Attu Island.
    [Show full text]
  • Federal Register/Vol. 71, No. 55/Wednesday, March 22, 2006
    14470 Federal Register / Vol. 71, No. 55 / Wednesday, March 22, 2006 / Proposed Rules limits and DAS for the SFMA that is (i) Category A, C, and G vessels. designating habitat areas of particular based on the distribution of monkfish Category A, C, and G vessels fishing concern (HAPCs), and including landings and DAS used by limited under the monkfish DAS program in the measures to minimize to the extent access vessels. The proposed trip limits SFMA may land up to 550 lb (249 kg) practicable adverse effects on EFH. This of 550 lb (249 kg) per DAS for limited tail weight or 1,826 lb (828 kg) whole action is necessary to update the access Category A, C, and G vessels, and weight of monkfish per monkfish DAS descriptions of EFH in the FMPs based 450 lb (204 kg) per DAS for limited (or any prorated combination of tail- on the best available scientific access Category B, D, and H vessels, and weight and whole weight based on the information and to protect those areas the calculated DAS limitation of 12 conversion factor for tail weight to that have important habitat features for monkfish DAS that would be applicable whole weight of 3.32), unless modified the sustainability of managed fish to limited access monkfish vessels pursuant to § 648.96(b)(2)(ii). stocks. fishing in the SFMA are the result if the (ii) Category B and D vessels. Category DATES: Written comments must be application of this formula. B, D, and H vessels fishing under the received by May 8, 2006.
    [Show full text]
  • Properly of DGGS LIBRARY J-JEPARTHEYT of the I3TERIOIC
    PROPERlY OF DGGS LIBRARY J-JEPARTHEYT OF THE I3TERIOIC GEOLOGICAL SURVEY - Tr?RTED STATES GEOLOGIUAJ, RURYEY CHIltLES D. WALCWCT. DfHFXTOK WASHINQTON nov RRKMENT PRTITINCI oPrrCk IIlOll LETTER OF TRANSIfIITTAL Dllrpmrn OF THE INTFRIOR, UNITEDSTATEB GEO~IGAT. Smm, Wmhingtvn, D. 15'., FeFmtary 5,1900. Sm: 1 have the bonm ta tmnumi t berewith, for puMicatlm as a hl- letin, a lid of altitudes in Alaqka, dmwn mainly from t,ha chah and other publications of t.he Unihd Staha Grist and Goodetic Survey and the publications of this ofim. Very mpctfdly, HENRY GhhWXlT, U9mpher. Hoa. C. D. WAI~, DiwUtaitd SmO&Pd Swrnwy. AIA'CITUISES IN ALASKA . BY HENRY GANNETT. .. .. hlltg. Authority . Eler~tion. I I- EW . Achillerc MwnWn ......................... Ir . 8. md Gdetic 3. 021 i Survey*- Adakh Tsland ................................. .do .................... 5. 679 Arlams Mountainm ...............................do .................... 7'- thXb Aprrppir 3Enuntain................................ do .................... 2, 241 Ap.~~iqt't?~k ............. ....+.....+....+...... da .................... 5. 9.31 rigt~ik Irl:tr~rI (a%~~~idil~lnadu] ................... (10 .................... 2.511 Aph!ynk Idnnd p~nitliIwlnndR) ............... .do .................... 1. 5114) Aktitan 1~l1bnrl(Ftm Jrland~)................... (10 ...L- .............. 3. wn Alik h.~~~lilJulff~td (Serrlidi Islandn) ............ ..tin .................... ;:I 'U An~wmtJslnrlt l. .................................tln .................... I, !IUO Amilk I~lnnd..................................
    [Show full text]